Men just instinctually “get” this progenitor/offspring thing, history and lineage is a man thing, whereas to the wimminz it is completely irrelevant, which is why all the broken families with skank ho’s raising boys are so incredibly fucking toxic to manhood, these little boys have an instinctive desire and need to know their place in the great scheme of things, a desire that their fathers would naturally and instinctually give them, starting with their very names themselves.

Take two boys, they can even be half brothers if you like, one is called John James Cooper, the other is called Jedward Neo Clegg.

John James Cooper’s father was James Cooper, and his grandfather was John Cooper, JJ Cooper has one hell of a head start if he ever tries to trace his family, his history, his ancestry, and since the acorn rarely falls that far from the tree, he has a name appropriate to his ancestry*** hell, he can even tell what trade his ancestors had from his surname.

*** If you study genealogy, you see this time and time again, the same given names and indeed trades and personalities recurring time and time again throughout the genealogical record

Jedward was named after a wannabe “Sadsville’s got talent” telly program contestant, Neo after the fictional character in the Matrix, and Clegg, skank ho mummies maiden name.

JN Clegg has fuck all chance of tracing his family or ancestry, or even of growing into his name like a second skin…. the poor bastard is even going to be a misfit with his own fucking given name, and if that isn’t child abuse of the first order I do not know what is….

It’s more like 80-85%, according to the marketing research people:

“American women. The numbers are unequivocal, the gender differences are undeniable, the opportunity is inarguable and the market is enormous — economic opportunity No. 1″, says Tom Peters. Statistics overawe – Women are responsible for 83% of all consumer purchases. Vacations – 92%. Houses – 91%. Consumer electronics – 51%. Cars – 60% of purchases and significantly influence 90%. Choice of a new bank account by women – 89% of the time. Health care – 80% of decisions, over two-thirds of all health care spending. … American women by themselves are, in effect, the largest ‘national’ economy on earth. Unfortunately, too many companies don’t get it and often pay little attention to these lucrative targets.” (http://www.comingofage.com/sales-service.htm)
Yes, you read that last sentence correctly.

The top listing at google under “consumer discretionary spending data by sex” used to be a book called “All About Women Consumers” [American Demographics, 2001. 658.834082, Al52 2001]

IOW, it’s worse than you thought. The wasteland now covering hundreds of channels that is modern TV is the way it is because it caters to female tastes and concerns.

Anybody claiming women are superior to men and that their involvement in public life will “uplift” everything has some massive `splaining to do on this count. They obviously had it exactly backwards.

They also need to reconcile the spending data with the *earning* data the feminists love to trot out. If women aren’t earning the money, where and how are they getting it to spend? That part always tends to get left out.