Carbon is also as you saying basically “life” and “fire”, it is 100% of organic chemistry and 100% of life as we know it.

Nobody who does not FULLY understand the FULL differences between “base load” and “peak load” in an electric grid should even be allowed to comment on so called alternative energy sources… hint, solar, wind, wave etc are all 100% incompatible and therefore LESS than useless for baseload… less than useless because for every gigawatt of wind or solar or wave power you provide, you have to provide a matching amount of baseload capacity to cover it

baseload is today limited to coal / oil / gas fired stations (all carbon) big hydro (3 gorges anyones) or nuke

also, radioactive shit is EITHER radioactive for a very very long time, OR it is very very radioactive, please see
https://wimminz.wordpress.com/2011/09/11/environmentalism-and-feminazism/radiation/
specifically

note eating one banana = living 50 miles from a nuke plant for one year, and two weeks in fukushima exclusion zone = two mammograms or two years dose from natural potassium in the human body.

Again I got schooled on the old “you can lead a horse to water, but ..”.
So I guess not much use to point out to you how minuscule CO2 impacts the climate compared to the “supreme climate killer” H2O in gaseous form (hint:stand outside on a cloudy day and try again on a sunny one (bonushint: try at night)).

But go ahead, pay your taxes for breathing and any exothermic man-made reaction on the planet(aka. existing).
I won´t stop ya mate. I´m sure it´ll save the world. /rolls eyes

As for “every working scientist”, guess who they ALL work for? And guess what happened to the ones daring to dispute the “holy” man-made climate change models.
Right, they got their gouvinmint grants canceled and learned the hard way how the scientific method works in the “brave new” 21st century.

BTW, here´s another little clue: if CO2 is such a deadly climate change agent, why THE FUCK aren´t we PLANTING TREES ALL OVER the motherfucking planet?

Furthermore I can see some online anonymous grumblings from the economic/financial minds who are also getting the faint scent on the nose, the one that tells them something isn’t right, that there is something coming and it is not the usual downturn or even usual collapse. A lot of the younger men are starting to understand that all the textbooks on economics and finance were written for the gold-backed currencies, not a fiat currency that isn’t worth the paper it is printed on.

It makes me wonder if all of these men from different backgrounds, all sensing the incoming collapse, are going to figure out why it happened and tell the feminists to take a hike.

Your are aware that the actual observed warming trend between 1880 and 2000 (top of first observed PDO cycle to the last cycle top) was 0.7 degrees celcius +- 1.3 degrees? And you know how much reliance you should put on data when the error bars are greater than the observed change?

Climate change was sold to the public as an extential threat on the basis that temperatures went up half a degree between 1980 and 2000, and if we assume this trend continues it could amount to 3 degrees by 2100, which is a disaster etc. Extrapolate a short term trend into a long term one.
But temperatures rose just as sharply from 1860 to 1880, and from 1920 to 1940. James Hanson is on the record admitting such. And in each case temperatures leveled off for a decade and then went into a period of decline. It’s a 60 year cycle.

Underlying the 60 year cycle there appears to be a warming trend of 0.5 degrees per century. Which is not the stuff off nightmares. And even that is not statistically signficant because the error bars are greater than the observed change,

The only way to sell this to the public was to treat the most recent temperature spike as the start of a century long trend. Which worked fine in 2000 when the last 20 years were all trending up. Since then the PDO/AMDO cycle has rolled over into the down phase, and we can expect temperatures to trend lower until 2030 before turning up again.

As it becomes harder and harder to market recent temperature changes as a sign of impending doom, I expect a last desperate attempt to shut down debate completely by making Climate Change Denial a thoughtcrime similar to holocaust denial.