Comments on: Dropping pennies

By: Paul Murray

Paul Murray — Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:21:49 +0000

No mention of the wars? The wars are discretionary spending. If the USA would give up on trying to run the entire fucking world and strip back its military to the point where it could reasonably defend the USA itself, you would have more money than you would know what to do with.

By: hans

hans — Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:34:50 +0000

In the mean time .. watch your back: http://imgur.com/m3iUz

By: hans

hans — Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:24:03 +0000

“I think the US Constitution very wisely authorizes only Congress to create new money,”
And pray when was the last time your Congress did such a ludicrous(if you ask any bankster) thing?

These solutions are all nice and dandy but worth a flying fuck, when there isn´t even the smidgen of awareness about the underlying problem.
WORLDWIDE the monies dependent on the London central banksters(where the Fed.Reserve bosses actually reside) are designed to enslave the people.
AFAIK the only currencies not dependent on London are of Iran, Venezuela, North Korea (Libya, Irak).
Notice a trend?

Not a single political party I know of has made people aware of this supremely important fact (the money ponzi-scheme).
AFAIK not even the “lord and savior” Ron Paul.

You wanna know who´s actually trying to rattle the invisible cage? There´s your big fucking clue.

By: wimminz

wimminz — Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:12:20 +0000

That’s a bet I won’t take… I think it will go to #2 as well.

By: I Art Laughing

I Art Laughing — Sun, 18 Nov 2012 10:24:15 +0000

“The End of the Road” was decent, so was http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGk5ioEXlIM and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhFRGDyX48c.

By: I Art Laughing

I Art Laughing — Sun, 18 Nov 2012 10:22:21 +0000

What odds will you give me on #2 I have about 500 ounces of silver I’d be willing to bet it is ultimately war over austerity.

Also, just a thought. The reason we got Obama was so that the war in the Mideast will have a running head start before the rest of the world gets dragged into it. he’ll sympathize with the Muslims until his masters tug his collar or remove his head (whichever is most convenient) at which point the US is going to side with “Israel”. After that who know how much blood is going to flow to make the Georgia Guidestones a reality….

By: Tim

Tim — Sat, 17 Nov 2012 17:55:25 +0000

In the US, the situation is a bit more nuanced. It is only the federal government which has direct access to money created out of thin air; the state and local governments do not. The local governments feed off the state ones and the federal government, and the state governments off the federal government. And they all feed off the average Joe, in the form of taxes, fees, tickets, and even jail time (there are private jail companies in the US, such as CCA and GEC, which put inmates to work for less that sweatshops in Bangladesh pay and then sell the trinkets at US market prices; look it up).

The military cuts you suggest should also include drastic cuts in the defense industry (I am talking from a US perspective). Those defense contractors masquarade as businesses while in reality all their income comes from the government. In order to get those federal contracts, they must abide by quota laws; ergo, they are teeming with unproductive and otherwise unemployable “independent” skank ho’s “climbing up the corporate ladder.” (To be fair, defense contractors are not devoid of unproductive men either, but the percentage of unproductive men there is no higher than in any big company.) When TSHTF, cunt will become real cheap indeed, just like I am told in Greece.

By: Tim

Tim — Sat, 17 Nov 2012 17:32:05 +0000

I watched the video. It reveals and discusses a lot of truths, but I am not sure I agree with all the solutions it offers. It claims that the government should be in contol of the money creation (which is mandated by the Constitution in the case of the US—only Congress has the authority to coin money and money must be of silver and gold, a fact the video does not mention) and that in a sustainable situation the government can spur growth by spending its printed money on infrastructure work, interest free. I have a problem with government spurring growth. Government work is like hiring ten to dig a ditch during the day and five to fill it up at night (very wasteful use of scarce resources). Why not give interest-free loans to, say, private businesses? Who would control a dot com type bubble, so that it does not devour all the scarce resources? (Or a real estate bubble for that matter.) What would prevent such a utopian society from misallocating money (which would faithfully repesent resource availability) to fads like dot com and real estate, not to forget student loans? I think the US Constitution very wisely authorizes only Congress to create new money, which should be backed by gold and silver. In properly functioning society, every individual would have a voice through their elected Representatives, so whether new money should be coined and how much would be decided not by a secretive elite, but by all the people (skank ho’s included, which would be a flaw). But in order for this to happen, the individual must be involved.

Nothing can save a society from collective madness of its members. Today’s banking systems feed into the get-something-for-nothing vicious mentality of most people, just like the cheese on the trap attacts the mouse, which happily steps into its sudden demise.

Some interesting books:

“The collapse of Complex Societies” by Joseph Tainter, ISBN 978-0521386739. Joseph Tainter was an archæologist who studied the collpase of some great civilizations.

“The Crowd: Study of the Popular Mind” by Gustav Le Bon, ISBN 978-1475035025 (latest paperback edition). Le Bon wrote this book some time in the 1800s, but the concepts presented there are applicable today.

“Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of the Crowds” by Charles MacKay, ISBN 978-1604594416. Amusing description of mass manias and bubbles popping through the centuries. The fractional reserve system made most, if not all of, those manias possible.

If you look online, you may be able to find the last two books bound as one.

By: hans

hans — Sat, 17 Nov 2012 10:53:32 +0000

You forgot the prime cardinal rule of the supremely crazed alien-lizard-world-leader parasite.

Always control BOTH SIDES OF THE PROBLEM that YOU CREATED in the first place.
Or rather manipulated the sheeple into happily creating it themselves.

Here it means to make 3 impossible to get rid off.
By creating the very monies to supposedly pay of debt in such a way that it is actually impossible to do such (see “money as debt” http://youtu.be/e6LWqgohO4E ).
Or simply put, as a ponzi-scheme.
The real and ONLY reason for the ever-present cry for “growth” politicians and economic “experts” constantly intone.

Ponzi-scheme? Don´t be ridiculous! How? Easy dear lurker(too lazy to watch above vid):

Money(the principal) is created out of debt, but the INTEREST on this debt IS NEVER created therefore must come out of the monies of somebody else’s DEBT(principal).
^ definition of a pyramid scheme.

By: wimminz

wimminz — Fri, 16 Nov 2012 20:00:36 +0000

Exactly, we are at truism #2, beyond the point of no return, but before it goes to hell very very quickly indeed…