this guy talks about this starting 4 minutes in, but watch the whole thing

No way? That can’t have been cheaper than just…not doing that and being honest, surely? Wimminz logic.

Oh, and bötch, yes! Blowjobs DO fucking count TOO!

There’s a way around Lemon Theory, the same way there’s an escape clause from the Prisoner’s Dilemma – it’s having a higher obligation that you’re both committed to. Some sense of ethics, some notion of shared culture, which allows people to overcome the race to the bottom. Women these days have no such sense. They live in a fictionalized reality they generate, and it’s got to the point where they don’t even pay lip-service to having a higher principle they follow.

(This is why I like Monarchy, FTR – even if the monarch is a psychopath, he’s still got to pretend to give a shit about being a good Christian – and that’s the next best thing to being a good Christian, as far as I’m concerned in my dealings with him.)

The women don’t subscribe to a higher value (nothing but relative value, whatever script they choose to believe in at the moment), they never suffer any immediate consequences thanks to all the thirsty white knights and gov’t programs, and they don’t even pretend to honour things like marital fidelity (at least a hypocrite does what they say 99% of the time). They only honour things like “a mother’s love” and a 30 second orgasm – things that aren’t exactly difficult for them to honour.

The stupidest part is, that the #1 victim of their lies is always themselves; they wind up bullshitting themselves to the point where their womb becomes a tomb, they don’t learn from their fuck-ups, they re-wind the odometer instead and say “That one didn’t count.” The biological clock is ticking like the interest rate on a credit card, and they go and remortgage their home…

My only disagreement with you is one of minor metaphysics; I believe women *could* be morally responsible… they just almost never are. Maybe that’s what the Mohammedians meant with the 21 houris – that’s the ratio we’ll need to prevent heaven from being a sausage factory.

For the rest of us, it is a type 2 question, we cannot *know*, so it is all about the credibility we give to the answers we are given, and betting accordingly.

Assume I am 50 and take your example, skank A is 30 and has had 30 cocks, skank B is 50 and has had 3, which one is more attractive?

Neither, based on that “data”, because I will never *know*

(hell, they lie just as bad about their age)

All I can do is give a certain amount of credibility to the answers, the 50 year old claiming 3 cocks may not be a sex bomb, but if I rate her answer credibility reasonably high, she is a lot safer than the 30 year old claiming 30, but who I do not trust as far as I could throw.

The car analogy holds good, if you compare like for like, no pink slip, no papers, no history, nothing, you don’t even get to see the car, just a picture that is allegedly of it, you just get what the seller tells you to your face.