Comments on: Business vs politics https://wimminz.wordpress.com/2016/10/22/business-vs-politics/ Wimminz Sun, 08 Apr 2018 01:13:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Michael https://wimminz.wordpress.com/2016/10/22/business-vs-politics/#comment-9236 Sun, 23 Oct 2016 13:01:14 +0000 http://wimminz.wordpress.com/?p=5285#comment-9236 The US constitution only had any power here because men took it seriously and enforced it. Now nobody really cares, if they did there would have been a revolution already. So I have a hard time believing that having a death penalty to protect the constitution will save it either. It requires a level of moral certainty and testicular fortitude that is simply lacking in our society. Frankly, at this point Orwell’s final warning about the future seems to be just what most people today deserve. A boot stamping on their faces, forever.

So, I really don’t care about constitutions anymore. I second Bob’s suggestion of bringing back dueling though.

]]> By: bob k. mando https://wimminz.wordpress.com/2016/10/22/business-vs-politics/#comment-9235 Sat, 22 Oct 2016 16:57:07 +0000 http://wimminz.wordpress.com/?p=5285#comment-9235 AFor
The USA today is proof positive that so called democracy is the weakest system of human government possible

which is why the US was not designed to be a democracy and why ‘democracy’ is directly against the founding principles of the nation.

funny how they’ve managed to substitute that in.

AFor
Rule 1 would state that any individual or group that attempted in any way to increase the power, control, authority or influence in any way of the government over the individual be hung by the neck until dead… and that any individual unilaterally imposing that death sentence be absolved of all guilt or sanction.

this is the 10th Amendment with a death penalty clause appended.

not that i’m against the concept, but i fail to see how you’re going to get this implemented in a society which has outlawed dueling.

i’m also not so sure that it’s non-subvert-able. the current, Constitutional remedy to violation of the 10th is impeachment for violation of oath to uphold the Law. that never gets done, though.

in the case of your suggestion, they would simply prosecute in spite of your claim to ‘Rule 1’ protection. probably claim you were a madman or something.

Marxists are really good about claiming mental deficiencies in others when they want to consign them to death.

]]>