But you may be disappointed when others choose not to bury their heads in the sandbox.

Even one of the most respected intellectuals amongst the Japanese once remarked that the Protocols of the elders of zion is the most mysterious document of the 20th century, because all of its contents had come to pass.

What “most” anybody want is, and has always been, irrelevant. Everywhere.

The Notting Hill race riots happened in 1958. At the time, Soros was 28 and had been a bank clerk/administrative employee for a no-name bank for three years.

Enoch Powell gave the Rivers of Blood speech in 1968. At the time, Soros was 38. He’d been working for a more prominent investment bank, writing philosophy papers and certainly not determining anyone’s immigration policy.

I get it that Soros is a scary old Jew and has lots of money, but there must have been some events in the 20th century which he was not personally responsible for.

The people in the Milner Group were the brightest in Britain, and I find it hard to believe that they were just waltzing around unaware that ZOG was using them as puppets. Sorry. They were lukewarm on Zionism-the policy they pushed was that the Jews would have a national home in Israel, but not their own state, and that Palestine would be the Arab world’s door on the Med. They did not push this policy very hard, with the result that the Balfour Declaration was immediately walked back and the number of Jews allowed to go to Israel curtailed severely before WW2 (while Arab immigration was unlimited).

During this time, the Brits just up and decided to give their boy Hussein his own kingdom in Transjordan, despite the fact that he was a nobody loser from Saudi who’d lost a war and had to run away, and despite the fact that Transjordan was part of their mandate to administer, not to give away to their clients. So it’s not as though they were afraid to make bold political moves.

You’d think that if they were such Zionist tools, the Milner Group would have used their considerable influence over British policy to, you know, establish a Jewish state-that’s the whole idea of Zionism, right? Or at least to allow unrestricted Jewish immigration into the Jewish national home.

British citizens as a whole likely never wanted to bring them there

They were pushed there by a very small portion of the population, namely, George Soros et al.

Also, the Milner group does not work on behalf of the national interests of England. It was coopted from the start by Zionism, which the Milner circle was largely unaware of.
http://mailstar.net/british-conspiracy.html

The problem with Charlie isn’t him, it’s all his cousins, who made the refugee camps and much of Somalia such great places to live. In the big picture, it’s all your British citizens who brought Charlie over after spending lots of time making Somalia safe for democracy. That Milner Group mentality: sure, RIGHT NOW these guys seem pretty feral, but if you just pretend they’re middle class Brits, pretty soon they’ll step up to the plate. That Sermon on the Mount thing. Of course, there’s not comfortable point to go, “hey, we were way off, abort, abort, abort,” so the thing to do is to keep doubling down.

In a proper world, Charlie would get all the support he needed to run his part of Somalia at a profit, sparing him the need to go live in Exeter.