Comments on: Murder Inc https://wimminz.wordpress.com/2017/11/07/murder-inc/ Wimminz Sun, 08 Apr 2018 01:13:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: patriarchal landmine https://wimminz.wordpress.com/2017/11/07/murder-inc/#comment-9989 Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:53:13 +0000 http://wimminz.wordpress.com/?p=5918#comment-9989 looks like it’s only a fallacy when it’s done to women.

]]> By: Tim https://wimminz.wordpress.com/2017/11/07/murder-inc/#comment-9986 Thu, 09 Nov 2017 06:57:37 +0000 http://wimminz.wordpress.com/?p=5918#comment-9986 A lot of false reasoning with probability theory is also applied to DNA “evidence.” This is called prosecutor’s fallacy. People have been wrongly jailed because of that. Some famous cases of such wrongful convictions are those of Sally Clark and Lucia de Berk. The following article on wikipedia analyzes the wrong math:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosecutor%27s_fallacy

]]> By: guest https://wimminz.wordpress.com/2017/11/07/murder-inc/#comment-9983 Tue, 07 Nov 2017 11:20:05 +0000 http://wimminz.wordpress.com/?p=5918#comment-9983

]]> By: guest https://wimminz.wordpress.com/2017/11/07/murder-inc/#comment-9982 Tue, 07 Nov 2017 11:16:11 +0000 http://wimminz.wordpress.com/?p=5918#comment-9982 What forensics can do is highly over estimated in the eye of the public, it’s the CSI effect, enhance image, enhance until solved!
People outright don’t believe you if tell them how high the false positive rate of DNA tests is, for example, that it’s not a sure thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CSI_effect

When something happens, ask the cops if you should secure the crime scene for the crime lab to arrive, and watch the laughter!

]]>