Wimminz – celebrating skank ho's everywhere

It’s easy to frame a story any way you like, even when allegedly telling the truth.

The text below in blue is the complete unedited story text from the daily fail, the red text is my comments.

A respected Salvation Army major who took advantage of a schoolgirl’s ‘crush’ was caught decades later after the victim’s relative told her she had been abused. 

So the “victim” did not know she was a victim until 20 or 30 (decades) years had passed, and it was only then, when a relative told her, that she realised she was a victim.

At no time in the intervening 20 or 30 years did she ever read or see or hear or think anything to make her question what (allegedly) happened.

Anthony Huntington, 55, was jailed for four years after conducting a boyfriend-girlfriend-type relationship with an underage girl, committing the offences during trips to the baths, in his car after cinema outings and while giving her guitar lessons. 

Ok, so the guy is 55 and was just jailed for four years, so we are inferring that this 55 year old guy had a “boyfriend girlfriend type”, eg consensual, sexual relationship, with an “underage” girl, which might mean 15 years and 11 months old, or 17 years and 11 months old, we are not told the “girls” age, we aren’t told she was a young woman, we are however heavily steered towards the implication that there is probably a 40 year age gap between this sick paedo bastard and this poor innocent little girl.. who consented at the time, and who considered him to be her boyfriend at the time, and apparently for the next 20 or 30 years.. it’s all so very confusing.

Durham Crown Court heard that the abuse only came to light two decades later when the girl discussed it with a relative and then confronted him on Facebook.

Ok so now we are told it was a 20 year plus gap, call it 25, so the guy who is 55 now was around 30 at the time, and the guy who is a sally army sarnt major now, might have been a delivery driver or plumber or anything else at the time…

And again we have confirmation that until the talk with the relative, the “girl” saw nothing wrong with this “boyfriend-girlfriend type” relationship for 25 years.

Prosecutor Shaun Dodds said Huntington, of Peterlee, Durham, ‘more or less’ made full admissions, apologising and telling her he hoped he had not hurt her.

“More or less” is a lot less than more, especially when you consider the qualifier, hope you weren’t hurt by it, the sort of thing anyone in their fifties could say to anyone in their long dim and distant past, hey, hope I wasn’t too much of an asshole towards you back when I was a young asshole punk…

A “more or less” admission and a “hope I didn’t hurt you” that was said to the alleged victim on fuckbook, by the way, not a statement that was made with a lawyer present.

The victim, who is now an adult, had seen Huntington as some sort of ‘father-figure’ at the time when he took advantage of her ‘schoolgirl’s crush’ and molested her. 

Well, given that 25 years have passed, even if the “victim” was 3 months old at the time, she would now be an adult, and suddenly we have gone from a “boyfriend girlfriend type” relationship to something “father figure”… interesting how the dice roll and how the roll changes each sucessive time.

The court heard that as a Salvationist, he was a Sergeant Major, who had helped to run a Sunday school.

So the court heard that 25 years later he was doing something different, and “HAD helped to run a sunday school” could apply equally well to to the accountant who never visits the premises, or a fundraiser or anything else… since there is no mention that he is at the school with the kids H^H^H^H new victims of sexual abuse, we can safely assume that he was never at this school that he “helped run” while kids were there alone in his custody…

Mr Dodds said in her impact statement, the victim said she was, ‘disgusted and angry’ at what had taken place and felt he had taken advantage and, ‘interfered’ with her, as a child.

So disgusted and angry that she thought ABSOLUTELY NOTHING of it for 25 years, until some relative said something, allegedly, now it’s not even a “boyfriend girlfriend type” of relationship, he “interfered” with her, just a one way street from an old paedo to a young innocent thing.

In a victim impact statement, she said: ‘I didn’t know it was wrong at the time. 

Nor for 25 fucking years later apparently, nothing in 20 + years of adult life gave you the slightest inkling that anything wrong happened, not until that fateful day one “relative” talked to you.

‘Huntington gave me the attention I didn’t get at home, so I didn’t push him away. What happened has traumatised me, I’m disgusted that anyone could treat a child in the way he treated me.’

“boyfriend girlfriend type” relationship remember, so now you are complaining that a “boyfriend” paid you attention???

Maybe the “relative” who advised her is somehow connected to the “relative” who did not give her any attention or care at home back in the day… you think>?

The victim, who is now an adult, said that she had ‘trouble sleeping’ after realising the abuse and even considered suicide.

We’re back to the now an adult thing, 25 years later, and the thing that never bothered her for 25 years suddenly makes her all depressed and suicidal.

The 55-year-old, of Peterlee, who has no previous convictions, admitted six counts of indecent assault.

Sounds like the guy, when presented with what he did 25 years ago, copped to it, yup, should have known better, sure she consented and all that but as the elder person and male I should have know better, anyway, he pleaded to six instances of indecent assault, not rape or having sex with a minor, so we can kind of dismiss all that shit about little children and sex and stuff, sounds a lot more like holding hands and the odd kiss and cuddle, and yes, that shit *will* get you an indecent assault charge.

NO previous convictions though, not even drink or drugs or speeding.

Rod Hunt, mitigating, who handed several character references to the court, said: ‘Everyone who writes on his behalf is astounded and hurt that someone they look up to has this weakness and has caused harm.

They are probably astounded because 25 years ago they may not even have known the guy back then.

‘They can hardly believe it. They don’t condone him, but they would expect him to come clean about it, so as not to cause any more pain.

Yup, guy has some character, if he did wrong in the past, he would fess up to it, he probably has enough character to not be railroaded into confessing to something he did not do though, so indecent assault 6 times against one willing person 25 years ago looks to be it.. btw showing your 15 year old girlfriend a copy of a wank mag technically counts as indecent assault, as does wanking in front of her, there doesn’t have to be any actual physical contact.

The indecent assault offence SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDES rape, btw, so we know there was no actual sex, because actual sex even with a consenting minor in a “boyfriend girlfriend type” relationship is still rape.

‘He knows he should not have done what he did, even though it was consensual, and, as soon as he was confronted by the complainant, he admitted it.’

So why not tell us what he did, was it a kiss, was it a cuddle, was it some grabass, no, we are too busy stressing that he is 55 and the victim was / is a child and the whole thing was sexual and disgusting, the fucking paedo pervert

Jailing him, Recorder Timothy Roberts QC told Huntington his victim Regarded him as her ‘boyfriend’.

OK

‘But, you knew how corrupting it was and you persisted in it, on several occasions,’ he said. 

So he didn’t beat the shit out of the infatuated girl and send her home crying to the home where she was neglected and ignored, so as to scare her away, for his own safety.

What an evil misogynist rapist paedo bastard.

Huntington was also made subject of a Sexual Harm Prevention Order for ten years and registration as a sex offender indefinitely.

Game over man, and now the “victim” is entitled to substantial cash compo from the state, no doubt to be shared with the “relative” who advised her.

So the truth here is little enough happened 25 years ago, maybe with 20-20 hindsight it was cringeworthy, but neither of the parties involved had any issues with it for 25 years, so why did it suddenly become an issue, and why is it suddenly news?

There should be a 72 hour limit on ALL allegations of any kind of violence or abuse, sexual or not, because after 72 hours all the evidence is gone forever.

Can I sue the guy who sold me a vauxhall victor for 70 quid in 1982 because the asshole obviously knew damn well the clutch was about to die?

Why not, if this skank can take this guy to the cleaners 25 years later, what is the fucking difference, if you were happy to NOT report that shit EVERY SINGLE FUCKING DAY OF YOUR LIFE for 25 years then it is a big fat zero.

And if saying “sorry” on fuckbook or SMS or whatever to someone you knew 25 years ago will get you a conviction, we all need to entirely rethink all our social interactions and communications.