Wimminz – celebrating skank ho's everywhere

Sexual discrimination at work

Let me speak plainly, if you are female and want to apply for a job at my company all of the following need to be true.

Needless to say, there are no female employees, but the truth is more subtle and more interesting.

1/ The filter list itself above isn’t what actually motivates me, but no other short 4 point list comes even remotely as close as that one does at excluding all the other potential and real problems., in much the same way that you can adopt 99 different strategies for dealing with water borne health problems, or you can state that all water must be filtered to the 5 micron level and also boiled, you are not actually after filtered and boiled water, but it addresses everything else.

2/ The filter list is itself is discriminatory.

Both of these points are equally important, unless my company is literally infinite in size and capitalisation, there are going to be limits on the number of vacancies, and if there are going to be limits, someone has to lose out, so unless you adopt a strategy where you have 5 vacancies and the first 5 to apply get them, you are going to indulge in discriminatory tactics to filter them out.

It is the discriminatory tactics that are the issue, how dare you make your hiring decision based on whether the applicant was born with a cunt or not, how dare you pay them based on whether they were born with a cunt or not.

The fact is nobody who has worked to create their own business would do such a thing, we are in it to make money or make cool products or whatever, and arbitrary hiring and payroll based PURELY on cunt or cock between legs is a great way to go to the wall.

Let me explain the reality.

My current squeeze does a job that in many ways is not to dissimilar to a job that I did 30 years ago, function and skill wise, but 30 years ago my “interview” consisted of me going out in a wagon with the owners son for an hour or so, we get back to the depot and I am offered the job, which technically I still have to learn over the next couple of weeks so very probationary, but nothing is signed, no paperwork is produced, that’s it.

Fast forwards 20 years to the current squeeze when she got her job 10 years ago, and she needed to produce at least 5 different licences and certificates to even get an interview, fast forwards to today and she reckons she wouldn’t even get an interview, because there are yet more certificates required.

People will ask me can I drive a forklift or a crane or a bucket loader or track laying vehicle etc, the answer is always yes, but not well, and I don’t have a licence…. because I come from an era when you climbed in the seat and someone pointed out the controls, nowadays there are probably 20 different certificates for fork lifts alone, and yet the overall skill level hasn’t gone up one iota.

Certification and licencing was the push back against the equality movement, and today we are at the state where the certification and licening is so expensive and onerous you have basically two options to obtain it.

  1. Be fairly well off with significant free time and disposable income to attend the course.
  2. Take it up the ass as an on the job trainee pretty much indentured for 12 months or more while you get your certs and experience.

Both men and women have “equal opportunity” now to become a bus driver or wagon driver or whatever, then there are all the additional licences and certificates required to actually do the job, so more on the job taking it up the ass exploitation.

So for example in the states if you aren’t a complete cunt you can do three years driving for Swift to go from news with a car licence to a trained and experienced trucker, no matter what your gender of the day.

Then you have to go looking for a real trucking job based on the fact that your only work experience for the past three years is taking it up the ass from Swift.

All *that* tells any future employer is that you are probably legal so THEY probably won’t take it up the ass from the state for violating some regulation or other.

Meanwhile all the compliance and other bullshit means there is less left in the pot for your actual wages.

Meanwhile all that “equality” did was fuck you up the ass.

And yet it is all presented as being a problem at “the point of sale” when you turn up and ask me for a job, when the truth is that as an employer no longer do I just have to consider you as an employee, I have to consider all this legal shit too, so the more legal shit that applies to the vacancy in question and you as an applicant, the less chance you have of getting the job.

If you are a wimminz and you get the job, the problems do not end there, they are only just beginning, pregnancy leave, sexual harassment, etc etc etc, which all eats into the bottom line, so even if in theory your production was exactly equal to the guy next to you, my profit margin is lower, so you’re gonna get paid less, or I’ll find some other arcane but legal reason to discriminate against you in favour of the guy born with a cock.

Because EVERY employer has two factors to consider in an employee.

1/ their ability to produce revenue

2/ the cost of employing them

Even if #1 is equal for males and females, and there is no reason to assume that, #2 is always going to be higher for the female, because the male has less protection and is this more open to exploitation and profit.

There should be an overpopulation problem in africa with “big game” but the fact is that with all the ever increasing protections put in place, numbers are falling.

Protection does not just not work, it is part of the fucking problem.

As an employer, a basic kuka / fanuc 6 axis robot is on my wish list, this is 100% no bullshit genuine truth, I can joke all I want about hiring some hot young girl with big tits to man the front desk and my cock and make me coffee, but a kuka / fanuc is only triple the price, and every other problem with the flesh and blood employee goes out the window.

A kuka / fanuc ain’t gonna make me hard or drain my balls, and, um, ok, running out of “downsides” to this employ a human side of the argument.

If I could roll the legal environment back 30 or 40 years, the fact is the flesh and blood potential employee would not have nearly so many impediments, and the fact is if the receptionist / secretary did not want to drain my balls, it wouldn’t matter, because that isn’t the only advantage she held over a robot back then… and all the things the robot could do, she could compete with.

Today in late 2017 / early 2018 the most honest message that I can give any potential employee is this, it is almost impossible for me to find any reason to employ you.

Even if you are young and female and hot and offer to drain my balls daily, in reality it’s a poisoned chalice where the potential downsides vastly outweigh the potential upsides, so (me being straight) being a bloke isn’t actually any greater impediment, your sex is just a light sprinkling of chocolate powder on the latte, the bulk of the latte is the problem, and that’s all legislative and equality and rights and duties and certification based.

Even a vision equipped 6 axis kuka / fanuc isn’t AI, any more than Outlook or calendar or office or Quickbooks is AI, but the push is on to make these things better and better, because everyone with a clue knows the flesh and blood employee is a thing of the past.

100 years ago here in the UK even at my current age I could legally fuck and marry a 12 year old girl, in the past 100 years nothing about biology has changes, it’s all laws that have changed, and the same thing applies to employing her 12 year old brother and sending him down a pit to mine coal, the biology has not changed, the laws have.

Talk of “the bad old days” is neither here nor there, the salient fact is the laws have made individuals far far far less able to offer themselves up for what we now class as illegal exploitation, we have not ended exploitation, there is plenty of legal exploitation available, but the scope is vastly reduced.

As a scientist with a scientific, analytical and logical mind, you can site there and observe that in 1875 I as a late 50’s man could fuck 12 year old Jane and send her 12 year old brother John down the mines, and it was perfectly legal and normal, and 100 years later in 1975 those “bad old days” were long gone, and then another 50 years pass, and while all these human being’s “rights” are still protected so that they cannot be “exploited” as they were in the bad old days, now there is competition from robots.

Now, scientifically, we have something we can “put to proof”, if an employer is a patriarchal misogynist pervert paedo, which the narrative insists that all are, until enlightened legislation ended the “bad old days” then said employer is going to be rabidly anti kuka / fanuc, you can’t fuck them and you can’t send them down mines as small autonomous diggers.

What we actually have are employers like me that are tech savvy, and cannot wait to earn / save enough money to get their first 6 axis vision controlled kuka / fanuc, and the less tech savvy will follow.

The ONLY bar to getting a kuka / fanuc is the capital cost, there is no sexual / gender equality or harassment issues, no working times directives, no workers canteen, toilets or health plan, no worker health and safety training, no environmental regulations, I can leave the heating and lights off, no pregnancy, no time off to take the kids to the dentist, no holidays or holiday pay, no breaks, no height or weight rules, no rules about me swearing around them or doing a weinstein and having a wank in front of them, they don’t get drunk or doped up, they don’t go home, and I own their ass in ways that I could never own 12 year old Jane or John, much less their 30 year old parents…

Hell, they are cheaper than hiring a security guard.

So, the future will be interesting, as it is the dice and the field are loaded against the flesh and blood employee, and even a mass movement of people begging to send me their 12 year old kids to empty my balls and go down my mines is at best going to make a tiny bump in the road.

Humans have many rights, robots have none, so which one can an employer exploit the most for maximum revenue?

Even if you take away the rights of the human, each robot will still work 24/7 with no breaks or sickness etc so the human wage will be at best 20% of the cost of the robot. (BTW that vid was the state of play nearly 4 years ago…. very early 2014)

And good luck trying to level the playing field by giving the robots “rights”, that is MY FUCKING PROPERTY you’re trying to mess with, and you’ll lose, because I’ll level the playing field by demanding 12 mm combo spanners count, and machine made clothes and shoes count, and tinned food, cars, TVs, PC’s, at which point you’ll either get iced by robot makers or offer me your 12 year old kids in exchange for some shares in the company.

You ALREADY made the western worker unemployable compared to the easier to exploit foreign worker, now the whole game is changing and it is the meat worker vs the robot worker, old pavel had it right, robot literally means worker.

My Quickbooks is literally a robot, it’s just not a 6 axis cnc one, but my business has no book keeper, it doesn’t need one, quickbooks works literally 24/7, you pay your bill at 03:47 am and quickbooks records it.

The CNC component of my machinery is literally robotic, just because it isn’t a six axis arm doesn’t make it any less a robot.

My very small business has already eliminated a minimum of 5 flesh and blood positions even before it employed the first employee, and they were all fairly skilled roles if they had to be done by a human.

In effect not employing humans is WHY my small business is making a profit and growing, albeit on the small but steady scale.

Thanks to the laws of the land, I can’t exploit humans enough to make a profit and continue trading.

Thanks to advances in science and cnc / automation / robotics, even if you delete all the laws of the land and all the “protections” human employees “enjoy”, it’s still borderline at best, eg there will be *some* humans with exceptionally hot bodies and oral skills that *might* make the cut, provided I do not look 5 years ahead and take an ever so slightly longer term view…. and anyone who even *considers* employing someone without looking at the implications for several years down the line is a fucking idiot.

So, the tagline, sexual discrimination at work, bit of a play on words, like rust at work, or rust never sleeps, and the bottom line is as soon as you play that card, you make everything that possesses those attributes that that card can be applied to, less attractive than something that does not possess those attributes…

You render it obsolete.

We’re still only scratching the surface of the subject, little 12 year old Jane and John, the “bad old days” when they could trade personal exploitation for food and shelter and gone, what are they going to trade for food and shelter in the future, now that the things they are permitted to trade are so limited?

You think their kuka / fanuc replacements are going to step in?

You think the person that was pretty much forced into “upgrading” to non human kuka / fanuc is going to step in?

We’re all too busy trying to survive and make a living, we constantly adapted to the changing environment, you didn’t.