To be clear, Niggerz are men who are subservient to feminazism and wimminz, this label of mine has nothing whatsoever to do with racial origins or skin tone or social class or genetics or anything else.

Just as many/most wimminz deny being feminazis, many / most niggerz deny being manginas and misandrists.

There is a thread going on over at the Spearhead, The Better Davis Society, in which the niggerz are out in force supporting the wimminz agenda and trying to shame the men.

Basically at some point someone raised the issue of infidelity, I made the point..

Let’s say you are married or cohabiting or going steady with some skank.

Let’s say I fuck her up the ass when she begs me to.

*I* never made *you* any fucking promises buddy, *she* did

penny dropping yet?

… and suddenly the niggerz are coming out of the woodwork with statements like “well if the husband grabs his shotgun and shoots the pair of you in the face I don’t blame him” and other such crap, and oh yeah, all these niggerz expressing these opinions are new names to the Spearhead, who have been reading and lurking all this time, and who just happened to speak up when this particular button was pressed.

Why? Because they are the beta males who marry these skanks and provide for them.

Now instead of blaming the skank wimminz who made these beta males promises of fealty and fidelity and sole access to the cunt etc, they are blaming the men who are smart enough to know those promises are all bullshit, the men who are quite happy to fuck your wife up the ass (something YOU aren’t allowed to do Mr Beta provider) when she begs us to, and then dump the skank ho back in your lap as soon as she wants anything else.

It’s MY fault YOUR girlfriend is a filthy lying whore, and YOU reward her for this behaviour by defending her and protecting her and feeding and housing her???

Clearly, logically, it ain’t my fault, yet these niggerz are clearly unable to think logically….

…wait a minute, what class of human beings does that remind me of… no, no, don’t tell me, it’s on the tip of my tongue, I’ll get it in a minute… hmmm, I know…

WIMMINZ!

That’s right, wimminz and niggerz are both either unable to, or refuse to (same end result) use their brain to think logically.

Let’s face it, to put up with a wimminz bullshit and to be her “feeder”, her “enabler”, her vanity mirror mirror on the wall, her protector, you basically have to shut down all the logical circuits in your male brain, there is simply no alternative… this is like mice infected with the brain parasite that makes cat piss smell interesting claiming that finding cat piss interesting is their choice, their right, their free will, and they will grab a shot gun and shoot any mouse who says different and fucks minnie while they are out sipping tom’s piss.

And here’s another thing, you niggerz with all your talk about shotguns and stomping ass and shit.

You really seriously believe in my career I have never come across your type when the realisation hit you that I was fucking your wife up the ass and she worshipped me for it?

If you niggerz cunts were CAPABLE of kicking my ass you’d be able to fuck your own wife up the ass and she wouldn’t need me to treat her like a whore and pound all her holes like the animal she is… penny dropping yet?

If you weren’t such a mangina beta niggerz you might be able to pose a serious or credible threat to me, you wouldn’t be such a fucking pathetic beta “feeder”, and your wife/girlfriend/whatever might respect you a bit more and get some more of what she craves from you, instead of from men.

Fact is, you find me fucking your wife, you should offer to thank me somehow, because I am doing you a fucking great favour you mangina beta niggerz.

I am doing you the favour of not taking your bitch away from you, because she will drop your mangina beta niggerz ass in a heartbeat to follow me around begging to make her mine, and because if I didn’t purge those desires periodically, desires you are unable to acknowledge much less satisfy, the bitch would dump your ass in search of another man to scratch her itch. Maybe a whole series of them.

I am PRESERVING your marriage / relationship you stupid beta niggerz, the only problem here is your stupid fucking delusion that your swinging cock is the only one going near her holes, like that is some right you earn in exchange for being her feeder.

Oh, and your stupid fucking delusion that when push comes to shove you will actually stop being a niggerz and start being a man and actually be able to face me and your skank down, when the reality is you will scream and stamp your feet, which will make me laugh and which will make your girlfriend/wifes cunt gush with desire for me, as you further establish my credibility and manhood with every breath / gesture / word / thought that you do, underlining your feeder status, confirming that you actually care about the long term tending of that cunt, while underlining my status as a man who has no interest in that cunt beyond periodically pounding the fuck out of it and dumping my cum in there, if I feel like it, if the bitch is obedient and subservient enough.

Where do you think these guys come from who like to watch their wife / girlfriend being fucked by other men, and then be “rewarded” themselves by going down on that used cunt?

Are you really so stupid you think they are made that way?
At 14 all their erotic dreams revolved around bringing their wife to orgasm by licking another man’s semen out of her cunt?
And then maybe once a week being allowed to deposit some of his own in that cunt?

You think even one single one of those guys did not get there except by one day actually trying to enforce control of his wife/girlfriends cunt with the man who was cuckolding him, only to find that that man did not see his as a credible threat, and the so called loyal wife/girlfriend joins in the humiliation, and now your cuckolded ass is out in the open in front of all three of you, and now you get to go down on that used cunt, or go find another one that will let you become its feeder.

You stupid married / cohabiting beta mangina niggerz who think cunts naturally smell of fish and naturally taste of chicken… I have seen and heard you stupid cunts even tell me shit (and this is real world examples) that your wife’s cunt smells all sort of musty and earthy and doggy, meanwhile the family labrador is fucking the two year olds thomas the tank engine, I have had you tell me that after a night out with the girls, one of those back at 6 am or later nights out with the girls, you wife is tired and sweaty and just wants to shower and sleep all day, or your wife is tired out after doing all the housework and school runs and laundry all day (yeah, better change the sheets after my cum leaks out onto them), or you are like only the third guy every to be with her, and those guys on facebook etc are old classmates and husbands of their girlfriends and shit.

NOBODY could be that dumb and delusional unless they work at it 24/7, the definition of wimminz and their niggerz.

I *thought* about directing this at young men, as a clue-bat, but, on reflection, it applies to all men, irrespective of age.

Wimminz “brains” or what passes for them, are flaky and constantly variable things.

Wimminz can be gazing at you with love and lust and adoration and worshipping your cock and pissing themselves with orgasms and telling you, quite truthfully, that you are the best fuck they ever had.

The next day, they can blank you, not return your texts, not answer your emails, and basically ignore your entire existence.

It is not the odd wimminz who can do this, it is ALL wimminz who can do this… wimminz “brains” are constantly “crashing” and CTRL-ALT-DEL doing a hard reset on themselves, this happens many times a day, it happens between one sentence and the next in a conversation, it happens while the cunt is still trembling from the best fuck it ever had.

This is a problem, not just because the vast majority of men ain’t like that, wimminz brains run windoze and are constantly crashing, not because there is anything inherently wrong with windoze, it is just that when you click on everything possible and indulge in OMG I am SOOO worth that gimme gimme gimme sorts of behaviour you end up with one windoze operating system supporting 25,000 various viruses and trojans and rootkits and redirects and exploits, all competing with one another.

SOME men’s brains are like that, but most men’s brains are far more stable and logical, men run Unix, and can routinely go for years without a reboot or major system crash, some can go a lifetime…

The trouble is when you have men’s brains running the same OS they were born with, never patched, never updated, with a why would you, it just works, attitude… yeah, well it worked until you tried to connect it to a wimminz brain running windoze, and 25,000 bits of malware, and resetting randomly and constantly…

Now it needs a severe security upgrade and some emergency patching…

Of course it is immensely frustrating for the men’s *nix brain, being inherently logical it keeps trying to establish meaningful communication with the malware ridden script kiddies playground that is the wimminz brain, and to do so in a meaningful historical manner, because all that crashing and rebooting fucks up the system clock in wimminz, so there is no timeline, everything has weird and wacky time stamps, but only NOW counts, and now is so fleeting….

Meanwhile the male *nix brain still tries to communicate, while feeling pain, and confusion, and rejection, and … you get the picture.

Instead of “Hey I’m Sue and I’m running wimminz brain 3.5 and wimminz browser 4.5 and wimminz mail client 6.3 and I’d really like to exchange these files with you as soon as we have established some common protocols, for our mutual benefit”

eg TCP/IP

What we get is “Hey I’m a princesssss look at meeeeeee oooh shiny gimme gimme gimme yeah but no but yeah but maybe but hey what’s that over there grody cool what does this do bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzt shutdown -r this system is rebooting, please wait……….”

And if you are laughing, you are a fucking idiot.

Because the Law and “consent” is written in TCP/IP like language… penny dropping yet?

The red text above, “but only NOW counts, and now is so fleeting..” think about that in terms of consent, and the wimminz windoze virus farm vs the man running some flavour of *nix with a consistent system clock so every file is recorded in sequence.

It presents something of a problem, doesn’t it…

The whole language of law and consent and rights and responsibilities is written in a language that can only be expressed meaningfully on a stable system that adheres to rules and protocols and norms.

Yet the wimminz running widowz virus farm precious princess edition with 25,000 free competing bits of malware and a system uptime that can be as much as a day, or as little as a few minutes, is *supposed* to be the only one that can consent…

which reboot/crash cycle are we talking about here?

From the wimminz windoze point of view, even that statement is meaningless, there are all these junked up files and shit with stupid dates, and none of them are pink and fluffy, so probably some stupid man put them there, because there is NO WAY this girl did, and THIS system uptime is all there is, or has been, or will be, now where the fuck is my diet latte?

You see where this is going….

If you are going to be intellectually honest, you are going to have to admit that such a system cannot give meaningful consent, not using the lexicon that the unix/linux systems uses to define such things, the lexicon these laws are written and interpreted in, such that once a file is written it may not be subsequently denied as ever having existed….

So, such systems are labelled as inferior, or chattels, or animals, they are not given equal anything, and certainly not allowed to connect to the internet, not even through the proxy of the husband… any such requests are store and forward, if appropriate, no real time proxy access. No Sir.

Consent, therefore, is a meaningless concept, like file integrity in a windoze system that has been pwned by 25,000 different pieces of malware, it cannot be obtained, you can get a pattern / hash match, but it is so easily revoked and denied by the pwned windoze system that it is less than worthless, it is actually a severe security risk to the accepting *nix system.

All there is left is maintaining meticulous unix like records of MMS / SMS / IM / email / audio / video records, backed up to various places including the cloud for posterity and immediate access in disaster situations.

Until there is a worldwide system reset, and the world wakes up and realises that the economic crash means that these wimminz windoze systems need to be relegated to their true role as chattels… without any individual rights or authority or integrity, save that which they may accrue while being in the shadow of a good man.

Those wimminz windoze systems that wish to survive will need to elect to submit to a system purge by the *nix system that controls them, and boys, it is going to be BRUTAL.

Low level fdisk and format, windows install with full patch and a whole pile of shit ripped out as being surplus (think back to 98lite and embedded windows code) and the only application software installed is going to be Blowjob 3.0, TIUTA 2.9, Cook and clean 1.1, and Scratch my balls 4.0.

If you are foolish enough to install Talk 0.1 or any other such shit, expect the other *nix men around you to look you in the eye and tell you, “Boy, you install that crap on your bitch, and both her and you are getting blackholed, dig?”

In the meantime, remember, every wimminz windoze system you meet is fucked up beyond all possibility of rational dialogue, probe those ports to your heart’s content, but establish an ironclad set of documentary evidence for each one.

All intelligent life, including humans, has evolved to do automatic pattern matching and recognition, this is in fact a fundamental definition of intelligent life, and it even extends below the lower boundaries of sentience into autonomous life and plant life.

The vast majority of people today live in ivory towers, separated from nature, and so they know nothing of nature and start ascribing almost supernatural belief systems as explanations for very ordinary and mundane behaviour.

As an example, two or three simple rules = goal seeking, and any group of things, living or mechanical or electronic, that follow the same set of rules will appear to be co-operating with one another.

If you are the target of this co-operation, it looks like a conspiracy out to get you.

If your bare feet are firmly rooted in the loam of nature, and you daily deal with nature, red in tooth and claw, you realise that the lion pack that is stalking you is co-operating, but it is not a conspiracy out to get you, you realise that the locust swarm devouring your crops is co-operating, but it is not a conspiracy out to get you, you realise that the ants that invade you larder are co-operating, but it is not a conspiracy out to get you.

At least, you do if you have a brain…

If you have a brain, you will see that one of the fundamental principles of economics (and I mean REAL economics, not financial shenanigans) is that any behaviour that is rewarded is encouraged, and any behaviour that is penalised is discouraged.

So making yourself an expensive meal for lions, making your crops an unattractive meal for locusts, and making your larder unpleasant for ants all discourage their predation, while doing the opposite encourages their predation.

Nota Bene, we have just fundamentally altered the status quo of simple rule based goal seeking systems, there is still no conspiracy, merely nature reacting to changing environments.

Expanding to fill every gap is exactly what nature is.

If you do anything to change the environment and encourage one set of behaviour, it is absolutely inevitable that nature will expand to fill that newly created vacuum.

If you then look at the new inhabitants of that newly created ecosystem, then the fact they they are all similar is again not a conspiracy, but exactly what you would expect.

Nobody with a brain would expect to find a representative proportion of lions and ants flying into the the newly planted maize field to decimate your juicy fresh cops.

But take people out of “nature” and stick them in the ivory towers that we call town and cities, where the only exposure to nature that they get is other human beings, and suddenly they stop considering that the same rules apply, suddenly it is me me me, and anything that hurts me is a conspiracy.

NO IT FUCKING ISN’T YOU STUPID THICK CUNT.

When you reward women for getting pregnant by handing them social housing for free, you just changed the environment, expect nature to expand into this new ecosystem by providing a new breed of “single mums” who look like they were all made in the same factory, which they were, and act the same way etc etc.

This is not a conspiracy to deprive everyone else of access to the finite and limited social housing stock.

This is a consequence of altering the status quo of the ecosystem.

Rinse and repeat for the Family Court system, Domestic Violence, Rape, Child custody and access, employment laws, etc etc etc, and EXACTLY THE SAME THING HAPPENS.

New ecosystems created by changing the status quo economically reward certain behaviours and penalise others, colour me fucking surprised when you then observe those behaviours.

Family Court lawyers are all misandrist cunts, what do you fucking expect when you change the ecosystem and create a system where they are economically rewarded to always side with the mother?

Expecting family court to be populated by a proportion of highly competent and highly moral lawyers is like expecting the locust swarm that descends on your field of crops to contain a proportion of lions and ants… it is fucking moronic.

If you want to find highly competent and highly moral lawyers, you have to go looking in an ecosystem that rewards that sort of behaviour… just as in nature, it is fucking pointless looking for honey or honey bees under rocks by the river bank.

Again, ascribing the changes made in the status quo to some sort of illuminati working to some master plan is equally stupid and preposterous, and ascribing vast intelligence to agents who were themselves doing nothing more than following the directives of their own ecosystem…

This is the complexity of nature, you make one change in the ecosystem and create a new ecological niche, that niche gets inhabited by new PLAYERS, not cyphers, but active players, that themselves, by their very existence, make more changes in the ecosystem and create new ecological niches that are in turn inhabited by more players, rinse and repeat ad infinitum in a vastly more complex game of life.

The guy who decided to plant the field of maize is just as much a simple bit part player in the game inhabiting an ecological niche, as is the guy who decided to reward single mums with top priority on the social housing ladder.

There are no guiding masters, as there is no God, whatever controlling deity there may be resides in the very very simple rules and fundamental physical principles of the universe.

The lions on the savannah are not the illiminati, though they may seem like it to individual eland being stalked, there is no conspiracy, though it may seem like it to an individual eland being stalked, and simply labelling the lion as “the king of the jungle” does not make it so.

The Jungle does not have a king, it is an ever changing dynamic system, as is nature, as is life, even life in the ivory towers of our towns and cities surrounded by other human beings.

Now, the other thing about nature is this, each ecological niche, if successful, expands wildly to consume everything in its path and dominate the environment and change it utterly.

Like the simplistic games of life above, nothing stops this expansion except a collapse because the super colony has consumed all the available resources, or because the super colony itself collapses as it itself becomes the prey of a newly evolved predator that expanded to inhabit the ecological niche created by the very existence of the super colony itself.

“Feminism” is one name that we can give to this super-colony, but it VASTLY understates the complexity, and in many ways gives a totally misleading impression as to its nature, for example feminism does not accurately describe our running away from science and engineering and technology towards service industry and offshoring and social media, yet all these firmly belong under the umbrella of this super colony, some aspects of which have been focused upon by the MRM.

I have been FUCKED UP THE ASS by the family court and police system due to my ex deciding a false rape accusation was a great way to win a child custody / separation battle… and she was right, it was and is … but the FACTS are that the judges and lawyers and indeed my ex skank ho ARE ALL FUCKING STUPID CUNTS, this alone should tell you there is no illuminati and no master plan….

A 5 year old boy can out think a lion, and a feminist…. think on this.

So, knowing what we now know about the REAL world, the super colony that we have decided to call feminism, or capitalism, or globalism, or stateism, has expanded to the point where something has to give.

There are only two options, and they are not mutually exclusive, in fact in nature it is a universal truth that both are always present, even if one is vastly more notable than the other.

Those two options are resource collapse, and predation.

Resource collapse is here right now, we are in economic meltdown, the wil-e-coyote moment where he has run off the cliff but gravity hasn’t quite grabbed him yet…

Predation is here right now too, what the fuck do you think this blog is about, particularly the internet dating stuff, except the diary of the predator licking his lips…

May I suggest that those of you with a brain read the link on the right under men’s links The Slog.

There is no fucking illuminati, sure, maybe the lions swagger around thinking and acting like the kings of the jungle, but DNA and a few simple physical rules are so powerful they do not even notice the lions, much less their hubris.

68% of the volume of the Titanic slipped beneath the waves in the last 10 minutes.

This sort of statistic applies to everything from mammoths to “feminism”.

Prace bets now.

The following is 100% true and factual.

One of my skank ho’s on the production line, she apologises for being quiet, she has problems at home.

“Such as?” I say in a Do I Look Like I Give A Fuck tone of voice.

“Police.” she says, basically her teenage son, and the teenage local bike have fallen out, and she is threatening him with a rape accusation, and skank ho mummy’s response is to report the local bike to the Police for harassment.

Yeah, no prizes for guessing what happens next…

Told her, this date is over, now, get the boy to a male specialist rape lawyer as a life or death priority, his life is already over, even if he gets to the lawyer before the local bike makes the false rape accusation to the police…. if she gets to the police first, a teenage kid vs rape squad, he is going to fuck up, not make bail, be remanded into custody as a rapist instead of making bail, and turn up in the dock from prison custody.

As the excellent professor says in the Don’t Talk to the Police video (link below) that’s game over, Guilty.

Purpose of this post.

These kids have feature phones, and smart phones, but none of them use “the internet” or browse websites like the excellent False Rape Society linked on the right etc.

We need to address this information vacuum, because this teenage boy sorta knows it is sorta serious, but his mates all think it is a huge laugh….. if only they knew.

Video link – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc

I have a quote from Kurt Vonnegut.

“It occurs to me that the man and his religion are one and the same thing. The unknown exists. Each man projects on the blankness the shape of his own particular world-view. He endows his creation with his personal volitions and attitudes. The religious man stating his case is in essence explaining himself. When a fanatic is contradicted he feels a threat to his own existence; he reacts violently.”

This is perhaps the most profound and insightful and far reaching comment about human nature that it is possible to make.

The sick and twisted and poisoned of mind see everyone else as sick and twisted and poisoned of mind, and reserve a special hatred for those who attempt to counter said allegations with the light of logic and reason and verifiable facts.

No man who has been through the Family Court system can be in any doubt that those screaming loudest about “the best interests of the children” are in fact those with the least possible interest in the children, and who are in fact only interested in keeping their own noses in the money trough that is the court system.

They are in fact the very worst kind of child abusers, because they destroy lives for money.

If a rabid predatory paedophile raped my kids it would be a terrible suffering for them, but the act itself would not last long, and it is arguable that since only a sick mind could do such a thing to a child, it is not quite as cold and callous and heartless as doing the same acts simply because you were hired to do it.

The Godwin analogy here is this, if the guards running the ovens and showers who did so out of nazi zeal and xenophobic hate were unspeakable people, think how much worse they would be if they had done these exact same acts, but for no more than money.

And so I find myself considering most of those so-called “professionals” who inhabit the Family Court system, who have no interest in anything except maximising billable hours at rates starting from 250/300 bucks an hour, and whose abuse of children does not last mere minutes or hours, but which is repeated regularly over a period of years, are far more evil and vile and unspeakable than actual predatory paedophiles.

And they are evil, because they could have no other motive for violently and compulsively and obsessively labelling honest caring fathers as vile sadistic bastards who are a physical and sexual danger to their own children, on zero evidence and no more testimony than the accusations of the mother, who stands to also benefit handsomely financially, in effect securing a safe living income and housing for 16 years per child, except that, as Mr Vonnegut says, of projecting their own evil upon others.

Others whose only crime is to point out how absurd and impossible said accusations are, and the horrible consequences of acting upon accusation, and not fact.

It is no coincidence that our Family Courts are secret star chambers, ignore the smoke and mirrors of this being in the interests of the children, it is to protect those people, people who even predatory paedophiles who rape little babies and make their tiny anuses bleed can with justification look down their noses upon, people who care only for the filthy luchre, those people who strut around and give themselves fancy titles such as Judges and Family Lawyers and Child Services, those people who simply could not operate in an open court system, such as that which is used to try child rapists, cannibals, serial killers and even those who commit wholesale genocide.

Family Court Judges, Lawyers and Child Services, populated by people who make Klaus Barbie look like an ideal candidate for a jewish fertility clinic manager…

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

In the secret star chambers of the family court system, the answer is nobody.

From http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2008270/My-life-destroyed-Woman-claimed-Tory-MP-groped-says-I-painted-fantasist-wanted-case-ahead.html

This is about the lying skank bitch, Annabelle Fuller, who made a False Rape Accusation against a guy, who was arrested, DNA’ed, fingerprinted and interrogated by the Police, before all charges were dropped for a total and utter lack of evidence.

Now the lying skank bitch, Annabelle Fuller, is whining about the consequences to HER fucking life, oh really, I don’t see you doing 10 to life for a rape you didn’t commit, and life on the sex offenders register for a crime you didn’t commit, nor are you doing 2 to 7 for Perverting the Course of Justice by making a False Rape Accusation, nor were you fucking arrested and fingerprinted and have your DNA taken and interrogated.

In fact, all you got was some publicity, which is exactly what all you screaming skank bitches have been demanding, uniquely, for all men accused of rape by a skank bitch but still legally and presumptively innocent.

I fail to see the fucking problem you are whining about, bitch.

 

ARTISTIC . Drama Queen.
GIRLY . Thick.
LIVES LIFE TO THE FULL .Alcoholic.
I’M INTO WHIRLWIND ROMANCES . My visa runs out in 10 days and if I don’t get married I’ll be deported.
CHALLENGING . High-maintenance pain in the neck.
HOMELY . Frump.
LIKES THE FINER THINGS IN LIFE . Gold digger.
GREAT PERSONALITY . Ugly as sin
40-ish .49
Adventurous . Slept with everyone.
Athletic . small breasts.
Average looking . Moo.
Beautiful . Pathological liar.
Emotionally Secure . On medication.
Free Spirit .Junkie.
Friendship first . Former Slut.
Old-fashioned . No oral.
Open-minded .Desperate.
Outgoing . Loud and embarrassing.
Wants soul mate . Stalker.
Independent Thinker . Crazy.
High-Spirited . . Crazy, hyperactive, and throws things.
Huggable . Large.
Dynamic . Pushy
Assertive . Pushy with a mean streak.
Excited About Life’s Journey . No concept of reality.
Unpredictable . Manic-depressive and off medication.
Soulful . Manic-depressive and quiet.
Looking for Mr/Ms Right. . Looking for Mr/Ms Rich.
Very Human . Quasimodo.
Uninhibited . Lacking basic social skills.
Young at Heart . Over 50.
Youthful . Over 50 and in major denial.
Chatty . Never shuts up.
Financially secure. . Has a job.
Affectionate . . Horny.
Romantic . Horny.
Passionate . REALLY horny !

Any man who has been dragged into Family Court by his skank ho ex will be introduced to the subject of Risk Assessment before he is allowed anywhere near his own children, and indeed Risk Assessment will be used to justify keeping him away from his own children.

This is what Risk Assessment ACTUALLY is, so that you can spot the difference when you get to Court.

I’ll have to start out with TRUE risk, and TRUE Risk Assessment though…

There is this bridge like structure, you want to build a house on it, you have the house designed, you just want to know if it will all be safe.

First of all there is the physical real world, where the only way to know for sure is to do it (the difference between practice and theory being greater in practice than in theory) and see what happens, which is why I can take you out and show you 500 year old buildings still in daily use that look like they are going to fall down in the next ten minutes, and why I can show you the ruins of where buildings did collapse that “shouldn’t” have.

Up until 1900 that was pretty much how the world worked, you’d go out and build that house on the bridge, and if it was still standing today you were right.

Today we would do a risk assessment, what is the weight of the house you want to build, what is the strength of the bridge, but the fact is that this is a model, not reality, it is at best an educated guess, but it cannot account for a hidden flaw in the bridge structure or subsequent re-purposing of the house as a store to store very heavy items, or a million other factors.

It is a model of reality, not reality itself.

A competent engineer will not merely admit this fact, he will hammer it into you at the outset, he will hammer into you the FACT that by definition no matter how good the model and modelling is, it ALWAYS, BY DEFINITION, fails to accurately mimic the reality.

A competent engineer will also hammer into you the FACT that the amount that the model differs from reality is also, BY DEFINITION, an unknown factor, which is of course quite logical, everything that is not unknown is simply factored into the model, the trouble is, is you make a model based solely on know for a fact factors, you end up with a useless model, so people stick in a whole pile of fudge factors and rules of thumb, that are, BY DEFINITION, not physical laws which have anything at all to do with the reality, and which only relate to how models differ from reality, in an attempt to make the models more useful.

The fact is, for fairly simple things that work on fairly simple and well known and understood physical laws, such as building a house on a bridge, we have gotten fairly good at this, in fact we have gotten so good that we no longer build bridges with enough excess stability and strength to carry a house at some later date…. we no longer build static structures with massive deadweight, we build dynamic structures with very little effective mass at all.

We no longer build bridges that will last 500 or 1,000 years, we build bridges that will last 50 or maybe 100 years.

Our modelling has become so good that we have cut excess strength and therefore cost and material away, and now we survey the bridge every year, to ensure it is still safe for human use.

Our modelling has, in effect, allowed us to build crappy cheap stuff that is inherently more dangerous in the long run, for periods starting say 50 years after initial construction onwards.

So, back to the family courts…

In reality, I pose “X” danger to my kids, that is reality and it cannot be changed, I am either a predatory paedophile aiming to sexually abuse my own children or I am not, and statistically speaking children are safer for sexual or violent abuse from their own biological fathers than from anyone else on the planet, including their mothers, but even that does not affect single cases such as me and my kids, or you and your house and your bridge.

The statistics and modelling affect the odds of someone wanting to make a bet on the unknown factor of whether I will bugger my own kids, or whether your house on a bridge will collapse, but they do not affect the reality of me buggering my own kids or your house on a bridge collapsing one iota.

Compared to weather prediction, building a house on a bridge is child’s play, and compared to calculating the risk of me buggering my own children, weather prediction is child’s play.

Calculating the odds on your house on a bridge collapsing is trivially simple, given around 1,000 data points I can calculate the odds on any crappy old personal computer in a couple of seconds.

Calculating the odds on there being a storm next week is much, much much harder, it takes hundreds of millions of data points and supercomputer computing power running in realtime at world speed, and it is still hopelessly imaccurate even one or two months in the future.

Calculating the odds of me buggering my own kids would take quadrillions of data points and quantum computing power, and would be hopelessly inaccurate 12 hours in the future.

Nevertheless, in the Family Courts you will have so called self appointed “experts” who have perhaps 100 data points, many of which will be completely false and misleading as supplied by your psycho skank ho ex, and instead of giving the only possible answer, which is “vastly insufficient data” they simply proceed.

This is itself a telling characteristsic, the so called structural engineer who was prepared to venture an opinion of whether your house on a bridge will collapse based upon ten data points, half of which are not data about the subject, but slanderous and unsupported accusations about you, the builder is nothing more than a charlatan who should be imprisoned for fraud and banned from every going anywhere near the subject ever again on pain of death.

Yet in the family court this is exactly what the so called “expert” risk assessor does, they go right ahead on zero data and then proceed to pass judgement on a subject that is so complex that it makes detailed long range weather forecasting look like adding 2 + 2.

But wait, it gets worse, far, far, far worse….

Build a house on a bridge is a simple binary yes/no question, many questions, such as child custody and access are not binary, they are closer to questions like this;

If we build this new road, X people per year will be killed on it, but it will allow the transportation of ambulances and fire engines and police cars which will save Y lives per year… is Y sufficiently greater than X to justify building the road?

In THIS question the engineer has to FACTOR IN HIS OWN DECISIONS into the final outcome, it is not simply a case of playing safe and saying NO to the guy who wants to build a house on a bridge, thus guaranteeing nobody is killed, saying NO to this road means saying yes to Y killed every year, and we don’t know what Y is, until we do the study….

But wait, it gets worse, far, far, far worse.

Let’s just say we have done all the math to the best of our ability and integrity.

Let’s say 10 people a year will be killed on the road, and 100 people a year will be saved by the road.

While we are at it let’s say there is a 1% chance the house on the bridge will collapse any one year, and if you think that is high, think again, no modern bridge is built to last 100 years, so actually you calculate it more like APR interest rates, 1.1% compounded per year.

The big problem is that all these numbers are about playing the odds, the odds are X that SOMEONE will be killed on a road, that a house will collapse, that a child will be buggered by their own father.

But, BY DEFINITION, you cannot apply these odds to a single individual, you cannot work out what the odds are that one Johnny Smith will be killed on the road, saved by the road, killed by the collapsing house on the bridge, saved and sheltered by it, buggered by his daddy, or saved from his psycho skank ho mummy by being with his daddy.

If you COULD, you could simply go into a betting shop and place the same bet at 10:1 odds ten times in a row and take them to court and win when they did not pay out…

This is why when people take companies to court for negligence, a massive part of the case is spent in arguing that the claimant is not some random statistical person, but an individual known to the company in question, eg John Smith who has twice complained about the brakes on the company vehicle before being injured in an accident with a company vehicle with defective brakes.

NOBODY ever won such a court case by saying “the projections during the consultation period said that 3 people a year would die on this new road, and my husband was one of them, so pay me one million dollars compensation”

And yet, this is EXACTLY WHAT THESE SELF PROCLAIMED RISK ASSESSORS ROUTINELY DO IN FAMILY COURT.

The known and very real statistical risk posed by removing a child from the biological father, who we know for a fact is statistically the safest person on the planet they can possibly be with, is simply dismissed because that is statistics and you are an individual, yet ten minutes later this same argument will be turned on it’s head and used against you because you are an individual and these statistics say you will bugger your own children the first chance you get.

Nota Bene;

DNA evidence is EXACTLY THE SAME THING.

There is NO SUCH THING as a DNA match or DNA fingerprint, nobody has ever been found with duplicate fingerprints for another living or dead human being, but WITHOUT EXCEPTION, ALL DNA ANALYSIS in the legal system is nothing more than statistical analysis and modelling based upon assumed odds and assumed probabilities.

NOT PHYSICAL SCIENCE.

Not actual physical artifacts of any kind are actually examined for a match, instead the shadows cast by certain minute fragments of DNA are compared with the shadows cast by other equally minute fragments, and the rest is PURE STATISTICS based largely on assumptions that have themselves never been proven or verified to even the slightest degree.

I keep going back to quote Carl Sagan on what happens when you have a society based upon science and technology which is run by stupid cunts who lack clue #1 about science and technology.

Your family court risk assessor is not merely utterly incompetent at the whole subject of risk assessment and probability, even before she brought her own misandric prejudices to the table, she is too fucking stupid to even begin to understand just how incompetent and fucking clueless she is.

The police and prosecutors who start citing your “DNA match” as proof you were the murderer are also too fucking stupid to even begin to understand why they are too fucking stupid to be allowed anywhere near the job they have.

To be clear on this point of DNA.

You can use current DNA technology to CATEGORICALLY exclude any connection between two samples, so you can say this sample and this sample are without any doubt quite different and separate.

eg; there were plenty of fingerprints around the crime scene and one the murder weapon, but none of them match Mr Smith’s, substitute DNA for fingerprints.

eg; there were plenty of semen samples in the alleged victims’ vagina, but none of them match Mr Smith’s

are inaccurate and dishonest, albeit truthful as far as they go…  they should say, and none of them match Mr Smith’s, nor could they belong to Mr Smith’s children, or parents, or cousins, nor could they belong to anyone from Mr Smiths lineage or historical genetic location / region where his ancestors lived.

That would be truthful and accurate, because statistics, analysis and modelling are really good at 0.000% answers, 0.000% is not really close to 0.001%, you can divide any number by any number except zero, and 0.000% is zero.

Statistically speaking there is a 0.000% chance that a male dog can inseminate and impregnate a female human… it doesn’t matter how often you try, it can never happen…

Statistically speaking every analysis that simply omits huge chunks of relevant data, such as the fact that kids are safer with their biological fathers than anyone else on the entire planet INCLUDING THE FUCKING JUDGE, has a 0.000% chance of coming to either a safe or accurate conclusion.

Statistically speaking every analysis that simply omits the effects of the modelling itself on the subject is doomed to failure and has a 0.000% chance of coming to a safe or accurate conclusion.

Despite no priors, not even arrests or suspicions, not even peripherally involved with anyone who was either, for anything at all, my family court case decided, on the basis of precisely zero physical evidence, nothing whatsoever except the accusations of the psycho skank ho ex, corroborated by said self appointed “experts”, that I am extremely violent, that I am a rapist of adult women, that I am a raging heroin addict and alcoholic (of course, I am in denial of all of this…) and that I am also, contrary to ALL psychological material and data on the subject of sexual deviancy, an extreme sexual risk to my own kids, from toddler age upwards, irrespective of their sex.

So there you have it.

Statistically speaking dude, I have to tell you that you have exactly a 0.000% probability of getting an accurate risk assessment of your potential (and your ex’s potential) risk to your own kids in a family court.

You have been warned… so get used to it, shrug, and walk away, much better than failing to grasp the reality and going postal.

 

 

 

It is not a knife that you can wield to your will, to cut carrots or to cut your enemies.

Nor is it a widespread physical phenomenon like the gravity well of the Earth that affects us all equally.

In a display of integrity I have to tell you that yesterday was one of my most pathetic sexual encounters ever… physically she was a 2, but add in the personality by-pass and obvious mental issues the bitch was sub zero, I walk in her door, drink a coffee, take her upstairs to her bed, and there is not a lot going on, Mr Winky is only half rising to the occasion, nevertheless, slide in and start pumping, and literally around 60 seconds later I dump my cum in the skank.

She of course was basically and literally unmoved by the whole thing.

As fucks go, it was one of my worst ever, but hey, it was still a fuck, and free.

Then we sat around and had another coffee and she told me about her ex’s, and how she had an affair because her ex yadda yadda, and how the affair destroyed his trust in her which wrecked her marriage etc etc… and this is where the sex really went wrong and I blew the opportunity to get her back into bed for more fucking (hey, it was raining out, even a 2 in a warm bed is better than raining out… lol)

I said “Wait up. He may have done things that hurt you, but you have to take responsibility here, YOU chose to have an affair, your ex didn’t, so you have to accept responsibility for your own actions and the consequences”

That killed it boys, no more sex, however crap, and I was out that door and out that house 10 minutes later, but, it brings me on to the subject of today.

Integrity.

Now, wimminz and niggerz will tell you that the green text paragraph above shows a complete lack of integrity on my part, fucking some skank I just wasn’t into, and she clearly wasn’t into me either, but the fact is the skank and I both chose to fuck in her bed on that day at that time, and I have extensive (as always) SMS / IM logs to prove it, in very great detail… all that happened was that in real life there was absolutely no spark, but we still agreed to suck it and see if we could light one, and failed.

This is not a lack of integrity, and only someone totally lacking in integrity would attempt to label it so.

The fact is that what I said to the skank is what I also apply to myself, you MUST accept the consequences of your own actions, you MUST NOT attempt to shift blame and responsibility on to others, because of what they did or did not do, transforming ACTION into REACTION.

Wimminz and niggerz, lacking any concept of integrity, attempt to conflate action and reaction, when the reality is that they are mutually exclusive opposites… cheating on someone because they first did X to you is action, not reaction… shouting “We’re finished!” the instant when you discover cheating is reaction, not action.

Just because you can later regret both does not make them the same thing.

Me giving my worst ever sexual performance yesterday was an action, not a reaction to my psycho skank ho FRA ex, she has absolutely fuck all to do with my actions yesterday.

Yesterdays’ skank suddenly deciding to NOT go back to bed with me was a reaction, not an action, a reaction to me calling her on her bullshit about her marriage ending affair being an action, and therefore down to her, and not a reaction, and therefore down to her ex husband.

My mum “So why did you steal those apples from the orchard?”

Me (aged 7) “Johnnie Smith (my bestest ever friend at the time) did too!”

My mum “If Johnnie Smith jumped off a cliff, would you jump off too?”

Thus demonstrating that at the tender age of seven a sixties housewife was quite capable of instilling in her children the notion of personal responsibility and the differences between action and reaction.

So contrast yesterdays skank with one a few days before, she made it quite clear from the outset, she wanted 24 hours of fantasy, and we had 24 hours of very excellent and very kinky sex, hell, if she had been able to be like that every day she would have been a keeper, but for her it was a time out and she went back to her daily life as a single mum etc etc lying and cheating and generally acting like a skank.

The 24 hour fantasy skank vs the 60 second fuck skank.

Perversely, the total and utter lack of even the slightest shred of integrity is what rendered the 60 second fuck skank sexually unattractive, while the modicum of integrity displayed by the 24 hour fantasy skank in declaring that she wanted a 24 hour fantasy in which she would do anything / everything and love me in every way rendered her sexually very attractive, for the duration of the fantasy period…. when that time was up and the had used up that dose on integrity to return to being a run of the mill single wimminz with kidz with no integrity, she returns to being sexually unattractive.

To be clear, I’d fuck her again in a heartbeat, on condition it was a return to the way she was during the 24 hour fantasy, not during her so called “real life” day to day. Hell, integrity compels me to admit that I hope / look forwards to her getting that itch again and asking for a re-run… for my part I have made it clear to her that a re-run would be welcome.

What is interesting here is that Mr Winky clearly finds even temporary integrity in a wimminz to be a real turn on, while I doubt even viagra overdoses would have done anything for the 60 second skank.

Sexuality and sexual response for wimminz is at heart all about integrity, if there is integrity in your sexuality and sexual response you are all hot and passionate and the sex is great, if there is no integrity in your sexuality and sexual response then you are a cold fish and the sex lasts 60 seconds…. nothing turns a man on more than a woman being wet and wanting him… badly… achingly…desperately…

Nothing turns a man on less than a woman being a cold fish with a dry cunt.

There is, in my experience at least, a direct link between the integrity that the wimminz is showing the man AT THAT MOMENT and her cunt moisture and throbbing level.

The problem is that transient, temporary integrity, such as that showed to me by the 24 hour fantasy skank, is the enemy of lifestyle integrity, such as that which I aspire to as a man.

Again, there is no contradiction here, lifestyle integrity can also make a cunt went and wanting, but only for one man, and all that comes with being in a relationship with him.

Temporary integrity cannot co-exist with lifestyle integrity, in the same way that being honest with some people for short periods of time cannot co-exist with being honest with all people all of the time.

As an interesting aside, the 60 second fuck kept a lovely spotlessly clean and tidy house with kids who attended school, the 24 hour fantasy fuck kept a chaotic shambles with kids who goofed off school… there is a correlation here between the 60 second fuck who was in a stable and steady state of a total lack of integrity, and the 24 hour fantasy fuck who flipped between different states of mind…

The ability to keep a clean house and keep the kids in school every day etc etc merely requires a steady mental state, not a healthy one.

The inability to keep a clean house and keep the kids in school every day etc etc merely requires the lack of a mental steady state, not necessarily an unhealthy one.

The ability to be a good fuck merely requires a state of integrity for the duration of the sexual encounter.

The inability to be a good fuck and inability to be anything except a cold fish in bed merely requires a lack of integrity for the duration of the sexual encounter.

Nota bene, the 24 hour fantasy fuck was also extremely open and accepting of all responsibility for her life choices and consequences of same, during the 24 hour fantasy fuck, and equally clearly living in denial for the remainder of her life…. while the 60 second fuck was in denial 24/7.

YMMV