http://falseallegations.wordpress.com/

Another piece of work from the excellent Robert Whiston, dealing with false allegations of rape in Europe

There was a man who worked for the Rand Corporation, he was the subject of the film A Beautiful Mind, but, unlike the film, he was in fact a raving nutcase, he was schizo.

Being schizo did not prevent him from being credited with the invention of Game Theory, even though when it was tested on actual human beings it didn’t work, nor did it prevent the Rand Corp from selling Game Theory to the US Government as the basis behind Mutually Assured Destruction and the nuclear arms standoff with the former USSR.

The whole basis of Game Theory, unsurprisingly, considering it was developed by a schizo, was that you can always rely on the other parties in the game to put their own priorities first and to fuck you over at every opportunity, if they could.

Knowing this, and applying game theory, you could in fact achieve stability, as the USA / USSR did, and this stability itself was quite stable, provided one thing did not happen.

That one thing was actual human nature, specifically speaking co-operation to achieve mutual ends.

So in fact what was in effect a two player game such as USA / USSR could work, provided that no additional players were allowed to join the game (which is why the nuclear club was so adamant that nobody else could join) as any additional players meant that some of those players would inevitably start to co-operate.

This last little titbit also neatly explains US (and allied) foreign policy, DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES ALLOW PLAYERS TO CO-OPERATE WITH EACH OTHER, and of course every fucker including the players / countries in question know what is going on, no wonder they hate the USA for continually rigging the game.

This game rigging is not speculation, it is fact, and it is also fact that Game Theory depends utterly on individual, paranoid, players, all working selfishly… and really, what would you expect a paranoid schizophrenic who developed games called “Fuck You Buddy” while at the Rand Corporation to come up with, except a theory that everyone else on the planet was a paranoid schizo.

Perhaps the only amazing thing is that this idea, like so many fucked up ideas from so many fucked up individual such as (but not limited to) Freud and Bernays, was seized upon as the next big thing by those in power, and applied to society as a whole.

So, true game theory states that players who are forced into states of paranoia and distrust will always fuck the other player over given the chance, and will always assume the other players will do the same to them, given the chance, and this will achieve a state of stability, however, if the players are human beings and if they are allowed to co-operate, then they will skew the entire game beyond all recognition off into some entirely new and unpredictable realm.

The difficulty in politics and statehood has been ensuring a strict two player game, it was doable for a time with the USA / USSR and Nuclear MAD, but even there you had groups (NORAD for example) within each player co-operating to work to mutual ends, and skewing the game itself.

OK, all very interesting, so what’s the point?

The point is that many people, on many sites such as The Spearhead keep talking about marriage, and like everything else, unless you look at the whole picture, you may as well not be looking at anything, because the bits you miss are more important than the bits you are looking at.

Now, many men will empathise with the idea that a divorce / separation and / or child custody battle is in fact not a million miles from the old cold war MAD scenario, or at least, that is how it USED to be… it used to be until some of the players started to co-operate, and when that happened it flew off uncontrollably into an entirely new direction.

No Man who has been through this can fail to be aware that this is not a two player game, you and the soon to be ex, oh no, there is in fact a whole gaggle of other players, all of whom are co-operating with each other.

Lawyers, Courts, Judges, Children’s Services, and indeed the Police (as soon as DV or rape is alleged) all are in fact the very definition of co-operating players.

In Game Theory it doesn’t matter if the co-operating players form a third player group, or if they ally themselves either with or against one side or the other, the mere existence of the co-operating third player group totally and utterly transforms the entire game beyond both all recognition, and also beyond all prediction, and beyond all possibility of stability.

Which is why of course for example US foreign policy is that no Arab states can form a co-operative unit, it may seem to be divisive and all bad, but it does permit a form of predictable steady state, which to those making foreign policy is preferable to a system in which players can co-operate, because THEN the results are literally totally unpredictable.

Unpredictably good or unpredictably bad does not matter to these policy makers, any predictble steady state is preferable,  because it is a predictable steady state, and this in turn gives THEM the ecosystem they require in which to co-operate and survive… no need or use for policy makers in a chaotic system… head hurting yet?

However, back to marriage…

It doesn’t matter whether you start talking about marriage 1.0 or 1.1 or any other label you like, as soon as you introduce the ability for some players (and again, it makes no difference at all if they are the main players, the man and woman) to co-operate, you change the entire system utterly, and it becomes both unstable and utterly unpredictable by nature.

Laws themselves, such as no fault divorce, are not players, they are inanimate objects, but they are in effect the rules to the game, and make the game attractive to different sets of players by altering either the table stake or house odds or house cut.

The change is the introduction of the specialist Family Court system, with specialist Family Court Judges and clerks, with specialist Family Court solicitors, with specialist Family Court social workers, with specialist Family Court police.

Suddenly you have altered the game utterly, and you have a whole new set of players who, by their very nature and more legislation, are always working in co-operation with each other.

Suddenly the man and woman in each divorce / separation / custody case, and indeed the kids themselves, are reduced to mere bit players in a system that, as accurately predicted by Game Theory, becomes unstable and flies off uncontrollable in unpredictable directions, the instant you change the rules so that every individual player is no longer an isolated unit playing Fuck You Buddy and MAD equally towards all the other players.

This extended game theory accurately makes the following vitally important predictions.

It makes absolutely no difference whatsoever what the individual nature of each individual player, whether it be a man or a woman, is, no possible combination of individual men and individual women can possibly arrive at a combination that trumps the effects of the other, co-operating players.

Marriage therefore is not defined by the man or the woman, the true nature of marriage and children and family life is defined by the co-operating players.

You can’t even state that marriage is fine as long as you stay away from the other co-operating players and never introduce them into your marriage, because as we have seen from extended game theory, the other co-operating players have already altered the entire game to such an extent and no other individual player can actually make such statements, and indeed we have already reached a situation where these co-operating parties can unilaterally decide to involve themselves in your marriage, even without the man or the woman inviting them in…

Indeed, extended game theory, while it cannot accurately predict how far or in what direction these co-operating players will take the game, it does predict accurately that they will be the sole directing force, which means that they will always seek to increase their influence over the game.

What this means is that not just marriage, but the whole concept of family and having children, is going to fall under ever more influence from these co-operating players, the courts, lawyers, social workers and police.

Merely opting out of marriage per se will not be sufficient, indeed I myself was neither married to nor co-habiting with my ex, and arguably her previous involvement with the co-operating players predisposed her to automatically invoke them again with us, which raises some very interesting questions about the younger generations who were literally raised in societies in which the co-operating players were already operating and so had the largest influence on their lives.

My kids, like the other younger generations, literally do not know a world in which these co-operating players were not by a vast margin the greatest power and influence in their lives…. I grew up thinking and believing that the player known as my dad was God, but all these kids and the younger generations that and now having their own kids have grown up thinking and believing that the co-operating players known collectively as the state are God, think on that.

The conclusions, and consequences, are inevitable.

The co-operating players are still embracing and extending their influence, and individual men and women, whether acting as man and wife or father and mother, are going to see their already insignificant individual input subsumed ever further, while the generations who have already been raised and and are still being raised within this system will only perpetuate it.

Simply wiping out the co-operating players by way of some hypothetical economic collapse will not eradicate the generations of kids raised by this system in which the co-operating players of the State were God, and in which mummy and daddy were mere ciphers.

Wiping that out will take a further two generations, or 40 years.

Thus, the conclusions, and consequences are inevitable and horrific, the next western woman worth marrying hasn’t even been born yet, and won’t be born until at least 20 years after the present system of co-operating state players has collapsed and gone away, which means no girl born before 2035 AD at the very earliest is going to make a good mother or wife… and this is a BEST CASE SCENARIO.

Perhaps the most tragic thing of all is that, while according to extended game theory, once players start co-operating the system is no longer predictable or stable and will always fly off to some extreme, it could so easily have gone the other way, in which the institutions of marriage and parenthood and family were made the core of life, and in which all the co-operating players worked to support these institutions at every opportunity, instead of destroying them.

As I type this, Malta has just voted to allow divorce, which leaves the Philippines as the only country remaining on planet Earth where divorce is illegal, and therefore where the family unit is top priority.

And let us not have any straw man arguments about marriage for life, nobody makes anyone get married, except in exceptional rare circumstances, and even the you prosecute those circumstances, not the whole institution.

So, to sum up, and back to the theme of discussions on sites such as The Spearhead, marriage and family life and parenthood are dead, and none of my children will know them again, though PERHAPS my grand-children will.

If that does not frighten you, nothing will… luckily for all of us in this generation, we will die before the most poisonous and evil of these particular pigeons comes home to roost in society and economy.

Wimminz, well, they are the ones who embraced these changes at every opportunity, and who continue to do so, because it is still in their own short term interests to do so, and frankly there were no peaceful means by which individual men could have beaten this co-operative system.

The “reset” when the pendulum swings back will be utterly transforming for wimminz, it may be an economic resent or an energy economy reset, or it may be a pandemic reset, or indeed it may even be a technological reset based upon a technological step change, but what is certain is that when it comes it will be better to be a man than a wimminz or a niggerz, because both of them are going to face nothing less than an extinction event.

While there are many “Just trust me” warning flags that indicate that a wimminz is trouble, such as big hoopy ear-rings, red lipstick, any kind of social work for employment, ownership of cats, etc etc etc, there is one that stands above all others, and it always identifies both wimminz and niggerz.

Punctuality, or lack thereof;

I was always raised that “Navy time is ten minutes before time” meaning if I have an appointment to see you at 11:00 am, I am there by 10:50 am, and, as happened today, if you aren’t there by 11:10 am, I am gone.

Now I don’t care if the appointment is to meet some skank ho so she can buy you a coffee, or a job interview, it is all always the same, if they cannot be assed to get there on time then they are all screaming the same thing at you…

“YOUR TIME AND THEREFORE YOU ARE FAR LESS IMPORTANT THAN ME!”

This is a universal truth, no regular well adjusted fucker is ever late for something they actually care about, the cunts who turn up late for coffee dates and train departures and flights and meetings and everything else are always the same, and they always tell the same lies about what they are.

The lies they use for themselves are “busy” and “harassed” and “stressed“, and the lies they use for each other are “disorganised” and “under pressure” and “lot on their plate“, but the fact is that these are all lies.

This “late” meme also applies to people who make an appointment, and then message you changing the day or time  at some point before the due day and time… what the fuck? You think I should re-arrange my entire diary just so you can see me? What the fuck am I, your fucking hairdresser?

An appointment, however casually expressed, such as “Yeah, I’ll see you for coffee at Joe’s cafe next Wednesday at 11 am.” is nothing less than an informal promise, it is exactly a statement of intent, and if someone makes a statement of intent and does not follow through on one thing, then they will not follow through on ANY thing that they say they will do.

Punctuality is NOT a guarantee of good character,
however,
tardiness IS a guarantee of bad character.

You have been warned.

In a post / comment on The Spearhead, Keyster says;

“And I have a great deal of respect for anyone who digs in to their time, money and personal life to actually DO SOMETHING more than talk.”

I just wanted that statement repeated one more time here.

If HALF of all who self-identify as “MRA’s” did something besides talk, we’d have a real movement on our hands. By “talk” I mean personally sniping at others, that might not conform 100% to their worldview.
How counter-productive is that?

I suppose that in the interests of full disclosure, Keyster is a close collaborator with Paul Elam of AVFM, whom I have mentioned previously, and I have noted similar attitudes from him.

This comment was essentially support for PE’s shaming language post discussed earlier.

The facts are that Paul Elam and Keysters efforts to date do not amount to a hill of beans, the monster that is feminzism feeds at the table provided by the State, and the State can only afford that table by taxing productive men working hard to pay alimony and child support and general taxes.

If you really want to fuck the system, contribute fuck all to the State, while taking it for every last thing you can…. as I type this the USA has hit its credit limit, if only 5% of the men in the USA say fuck it, MGTOW for me, stop working (or work black economy cash in hand) stop buying useless crap, stop paying to support ex’s and kids and stop paying anything for other women, and start claiming as much as they humanly can, the wheels will fall off the feminazi wagon.

You think Palin or Hitlary want the job as prezzident if no one else wants the fucking job because the state is broke and collapsing and all anyone is going to remember is who was at the controls when the whole thing fell out of the sky in flames???

Edmond Locard was the father of forensic science.

His famous dictum goes thus;

“Physical evidence cannot be wrong,
it cannot perjure itself,
it cannot be wholly absent.”

Logically, this is both an extremely clear, and an unassailable statement, only a Creationist or Feminazi could possibly argue with it, no one of sound mind could argue with it.

Even planted physical evidence cannot be wrong, so if I leave a cigarette butt with your DNA at the scene of a murder I commit in order to implicate you, what Locard’s Principle states is there must be some physical evidence that I was in the place to plant the evidence.

Note that the lazy policeman who grabs the cigarette butt (in films usually some obscure brand with some obscure brand of lipstick) AND THEN STOPS LOOKING FOR FURTHER EVIDENCE is the problem here, Locard’s Principle holds true, evidence of my being there and planting the butt was simply ignored when the policeman STOPS LOOKING ANY FURTHER.

Speaking as someone who was falsely accused of rape, and a score of other equally vile offences, by my skank ho ex, thankfully for all the wimminz out there when allegations of rape are made, the police are not allowed to do this, it is a career ending move…. when a rape is alleged, there are no budgetary or resource limits put in place, and all possible evidence is removed and catalogued.

In my case this was six forensic officers spending an entire day ransacking my entire house, a police high tech forensic squad spending a year poring in loving details over every single byte of my terabytes of hard disk looking for the alleged child and animal porn, all bedsheets and bedding lovingly scraped for DNA, and of course my entire history from birth put under the microscope.

Now, as I have said elsewhere in the pages on the right, having been through a rape enquiry, however much I may hate the police for their attitude, not only can I not fault their dedication and methodology, but also I simply cannot perceive of any way for a guilty actual rapist to beat this system… it simply is not credible.

I said this time and time again, long before I had ever heard of Locard, or knew anything of forensic science or investigative techniques beyond TV fantasy.

But Locard in his brilliance neatly summarises in that short sentence in red at the top of this page everything that I have been saying.

The evidence never lies, and there can never be no evidence for an event that actually did happen.

Now, let me give you an actual, factual, concrete, real world example.

The skank ho ex, in addition to claiming to be a rape victim, decides to sweeten the pot by saying you are a child pornographer and paedophile, as this will help her get custody, which is what this shit is all about.

In planning this atrocity, the skank ho of course knows that I am none of these things, so some evidence will have to be procured and planted.

What better way to convict someone than by downloading some actual child pornography, burning it to a DVD, and planting it in your house a day or two before you call the cops?

Hang on, she thinks, he may argue that the DVD is not his, how can I head this one off at the pass? I know, I will include some home made porn showing him fucking me (consensually) last summer.

So, police come through your door, arrest you on suspicion of rape and a bunch of other obscene stuff, take all your shit away for forensic analysis…

… find one DVD with kiddie porn, and a clip of you fucking the ex missionary style, up her ass, and getting a blowjob, with your face showing so everyone knows it is you.

This DVD, together with the constant mantra about “imminent prosecution” is used to prevent you from having ANY contact with your kids for the next two years while the case rumbles on.

Now, at this point I would like those of you who are not IT savvy to take notes, and consult with someone who is, or read up on the subject, because this is important, because I am going to talk about how computers work, and because it invokes Locard.

There is something known as “data” which for example could be the file that is this very page that you are reading now, or another document, or a digital photo, or digital video, etc.

There is also something known as “metadata” which is not any of the above, but which is information ABOUT the above, when they were created, last accessed or modified or deleted, etc etc.

Computers basically record EVERYTHING you do, every keypress, every mouse click, every file accessed or modified or created or deleted, they do this 24/7 in the background, and it is this metadata that data recocery companies and computer forensic departments deal with.

To be sure, old data does get over written, in the same way that you car may well be repainted and modified many times in its lifetime, however, you simply cannot “fake” the fact that three colours ago, under the present blue and previous yellow paint jobs, it used to be red, you can give it a bare metal rub down and fresh spray in green, but even this is OBVIOUSLY a new paint job, the paint is new, the factory never offered that shade of green, and the previous owner 3 owners ago registered the fact that he repainted the car from factory red to yellow.

And, in computer forensics, even the tiniest bit of old paint, ANYWHERE, is sufficient, forget the door panel, take scrapings from the engine bay, under the carpets by the rear seats, under the rubber seals that hold the windscreen in… these represent the tiny shards of files left over when a file is “deleted” and the disk space it occupied is marked as empty and available for use again.

To be specific, with regard to the DVD of kiddie porn;

1. If any of the kiddie porn images and videos on the DVD were ever present on any of my computers, there will be traces of those files, OR, there will be evidence of massive and regular disk scrubbing and high level encryption used to conceal the fact that those files were ever present on any of my computers… THERE IS NO OTHER OPTION OR POSSIBILITY for computers that have been in solid use for some years.
2. If the consensual sex with the ex home made and quite legal porn file on the DVD were ever present on any of my computers, there will be traces of those files, OR, there will be evidence of massive and regular disk scrubbing and high level encryption used to conceal the fact that those files were ever present on any of my computers… THERE IS NO OTHER OPTION OR POSSIBILITY for computers that have been in solid use for some years.
3. If the DVD in question was burned on any of my computers there will be a record of a DVD with that “volume label” having been created on my computer, OR, there will be evidence of massive and regular disk scrubbing and high level encryption used to conceal the fact that those files were ever present on any of my computers… THERE IS NO OTHER OPTION OR POSSIBILITY for computers that have been in solid use for some years.
4. If the DVD in question was inserted or mounted or played on any of my computers, there will be a record on that, OR, there will be evidence of massive and regular disk scrubbing and high level encryption used to conceal the fact that those files were ever present on any of my computers… THERE IS NO OTHER OPTION OR POSSIBILITY for computers that have been in solid use for some years.
5. If the DVD in question was ever handled by me, at ANY STAGE, even when BLANK out of the spindle of blanks, it will contain many both partial and full fingerprints of mine, and I have just been fingerprinted, and it will also contain significant traces of amino acids and oils from my handling of it, and I have just had DNA samples taken, and buddy, if you think the forensic service are NOT going to do these checks then you have a lot to learn.

You can posit, for point #5, that I may have worn gloves when handling my private kiddie porn collection, if so, why would I NOT encrypt the kiddie porn files on disk, and why would I add a file of me fucking the ex conveniently showing my face?

The police, for their part, wanted to know (after countless hours and tens of thousands of pounds of forensic lab effort) if I had ever disposed of any computer equipment, since all my computers were clean, the only other physical possibility being that I had used a “kiddie porn only” computer which I had since disposed of.

I told them, you have ALL my records, ALL my emails, ALL my bank records paper and otherwise, ALL my correspondence, you know as well as I do that the ONLY TWO COMPUTERS I HAVE “DISPOSED” OF ARE THE TWO COMPUTERS I GAVE TO THE WOMAN MAKING THESE ACCUSATIONS AGAINST ME, as part and parcel of a child custody case.

Meanwhile of course, we are back in court every few weeks, me getting nowhere, her side hitting me over the head with my “imminent prosecution for kiddie porn” as continued excuse for zero contact of any kind with my kids.

I of course keep telling the misandrist police this, surely they can see they are just being used and made fools of… not interested in anything a man has to say.

Do the police seize these two computers from the ex? Do they fuck.

Do the police check the ex’s fingerprints and DNA against this DVD? Do they fuck.

Do the police answer my question “What was the DVD creation date?” Do they fuck.

So, two years later, have PROVEN FORENSICALLY, that neither the DVD in question, nor any of the illegal porn files in question, nor even the consensual home made porn clip of me fucking the ex, have ever been anywhere near any of my computers, which is by the way the very best proof possible of innocence, because it is actual PROOF of innocence, and proof discovered by the police high tech and computer crime forensic unit, which isn’t exactly on my side…………

What do you think happens?

Well, the ex’s solicitors can no longer go on at every opportunity about my imminent prosecution for kiddie porn, but the fact is there has been no contact with my kids for two years, so, you guessed it, the fact that I have had no contact with my kids for two years is now used to justify no contact with my kids….

The DVD?

Oh yes, the police decided to destroy it…. no, they did not decide to check my ex’s computers, and yes it is “unlikely” that anyone on the planet apart from myself and my ex ever had a home made porn video clip featuring myself and my ex, and to any sane and rational human being the DVD (it did contain illegal and extreme porn, I was forced to watch along with my solicitor excepts from each video file that it contained) can only have been made by myself or the ex, and therefore it can only have been my kiddie porn collection, or her attempt to pervert the course of justice, and making kiddie porn in doing so, and yet it is destroyed by the police.

Evidence, destroyed by the police.

I was SO FUCKING ANGRY, as I had previously been ecstatic, because in my stupidity, having been cleared by forensics I stupidly assumed that they would do the obvious thing and EXAMINE THE COMPUTERS OF THE ONLY OTHER PERSON ON THE ENTIRE FUCKING PLANET WHO COULD HAVE MADE THAT DISK, MY EX, MY ACCUSER!!!!

So, some two years later I get 100% of all my seized computers and equipment and porpoerty handed back to me, and as any of you who have had any dealings at all with the police, who are entitled to, and who do routinely, destroy computers just because one illegal metallica album or titanic rip was on one computer, this is yet another rubber stamp and proof of the complete falsehood of all the allegations as regarding illegal porn etc, that were made against me.

Fact is the reams of bank statements, correspondence, bed linen etc also being handed back also means the the police have neither interest nor faith in any possible future prosecution against me for any of the other allegations that the skank ho ex made against me.

But, I digress, you haven’t heard the punchline.

Despite ALL the allegations made to the police about me being dropped, because of a TOTAL AND UTTER LACK OF EVIDENCE OF ANY KIND,  the Judge in the secret Family Court case decided in the Finding of Fact that all the ex’s insane allegations were, true, the Judge specifically stated that he was of the opinion that the DVD of kiddie porn was mine, even though according to the Police own high tech computer forensic crime unit I AM THE ONLY PERSON ON THE PLANET TO HAVE BEEN SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDED FROM ALL POSSIBILITY OF ANY KIND OF CONTACT WITH SAID DVD, and that I should consider myself lucky that he was not going to ban me from going anywhere near ANY child, as it is, I am according to this useless and incompetent if not corrupt bastard a danger to my own kids, until they reach the age of legal majority.

Case closed.

“Physical evidence cannot be wrong,
it cannot perjure itself,
it cannot be wholly absent.”

Locard was right, the problem being that in our secret UK Family Courts physical evidence, and therefore fact, is not only not required, it is often, as in my case, studiously ignored, as doing otherwise would point to grave miscarriages of justice and the abduction of children by the system to be placed into the custody of the abuser, because, after all, the falsely accused has a penis.

I’ve been sitting on this for 24 hours to let it percolate slowly, and to ensure that there was no possibility of any heat of the moment stuff.

Yesterday there was a post on The Spearhead (link top right of the page) by some skank ho calling itself Izzey.

The content doesn’t matter, it was the usual wimminz emotional tampon shit.

What does matter is the reactions of the men, some of them in particular.

Many of the men, almost certainly those who have not been through the wringer to the extent that they have been falsely accused of a major crime, basically still buy the NAWALT bullshit and started treating the skank ho Izzey with respect… and then a subset of those men started wailing on those of us who saw through her (no great trick, all wimminz and like that all the time) for being so unkind to her.

And then we were treated to an astonishing display of white knighting mangina feminist rhetoric and shaming language from none other than the hand of Paul Elam of A Voice for Men…..  go and read it, around 90 to 100 comments in.

Now, you can call me an old cynic, and my reply to him was cynical, that The Spearhead is getting popular, so Izzey, an AVFM contributor comes over, posts something to stir the shit, bunch of other wimminz nobody has seen before turn up to support her, and when she gets called out PE leaps in to defend the skank ho, nothing at all to do with protecting AVFM page and advert impressions and PE’s own profile in the MRM, oh no….

I freely admit, I *could* be quite wrong, but that’s what happens when a self proclaimed leader of the MRM starts acting like dumb muscle to protect a skank ho, and pisses on and insults men who have suffered things that PE himself cannot even fucking imagine.

You lay yourself open to such allegations, when you shit on your so called fellow men so blatantly and so publicly and so pathetically in defence of some skank ho cunt,  “friends” like Paul Elam are frankly LESS use to me than, for example, the skank ho US State prosecutor he is trying to have disbarred, she used the exact same shaming language, has the same attitude to me as an individual man, but at least she has a cunt I could theoretically dump my cum in.

PE and many of his friends insist that NAWALT, that is their line in the sand…. to paraphrase the fable, they are the frogs who will still be claiming that not all scorpions are like that, too fucking stupid to realise that what I and other men are trying to tell them is this…

JUST BECAUSE THE SKANK HO IS NOT LIKE THAT RIGHT FUCKING NOW, WITH YOU, DOES NOT MEAN IT IS NOT IN HER NATURE, AND THE NATURE OF THE SOCIETY WE HAVE BUILT, TO BE LIKE THAT WITH SOME OTHER MEN (PLURAL) AT SOME POINT IN THE PAST, PRESENT OR FUTURE, JUST LIKE THE FUCKING SCORPION AND THE FROG, YOU STUPID THICK CUNT.

Now, while we are on the subject of NAWALT, let me give factual examples from my current internet dating production line.

1. 2 x 3
2. 3 x 1, 2 x 4
3. ? x ?

What these numbers represent.

the first number is the number of men, the second number is the number of times, so two guys (a threesome) three separate occassions, one indulged in gangbangs where she was blindfold, so didn’t know the number of guys, and didn’t know how often she had done that over the years.

I think in my entire sexual history I have met maybe a dozen wimminz who have not had at least one threesome THAT THEY WILL FUCKING ADMIT TO….

Of that maybe 12 wimminz, I know for a fucking fact, e.g. seen photos / cine film (that ages me) / video, that 4 of the skank ho’s are lying.

Scorpions and frogs, never forget, NAWALT is as stupid as saying not all scorpions will sting you, as stupid as saying scorpions only sting when they have been oppressed, of only when they have a damn good reason, and NEVER because it is an instinctive reaction because it is in their nature.

In my journey, during which I have been falsely accused of multiple counts of rape, extreme domestic violence, paedophilia (with my own kids) bestiality, child pornography, animal pornography, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera, all as part and parcel of a child custody battle, there is something that I have become intimately acquainted with, and that is “The Preferred Narrative.“

Now, anyone with a functioning brain and the merest shred of integrity will realise that when someone makes extraordinary accusations such as those above about someone else, and there is a thorough police investigation, and NOTHING is found, and in fact, as the accused points out, the accusers’ statements are full of mutually exclusive claims, outright contradictions and indeed admissions of her own criminal acts, then there is something deeply suspicious about the accuser.

However, as all men who have been through the Family Court system will attest, mere facts, and intellect, and integrity are mere illusory will-o-the-wisps when confronted with The Preferred Narrative.

The Preferred Narrative is always essentially a house of cards, and once it has been built, on the fundamental starting principle that the skank ho is the fucking Oracle of Delphi and you, having a penis, frankly give Goebbels a bad name and are obviously guilty of everything, then an irreversible chain reaction has been initiated.

The Preferred Narrative snowballs, but instead of accumulating snow, it accumulates “experts” all of whom charge by the hour and of course all of whom indulge in rent seeking behaviour.. to quote Buffet, you don’t ask a barber if you need a haircut, and the show goes on.

Grandparents want access to their grand-kids, no problem, the “experts” want to know all about where the grandparents went to school in 1928 (quite how this reflects on the well being and safety of a child born in 2005 is anyone’s guess) and as anyone who knows anything about where all these “experts” were themselves programmed with their bogus claptrap (see link on the right, Robert Whiston, and read the Anna Freud stuff in entirety) basically they have a lists of “indicators” and all they are interested in doing is finding as many as possible, in order to vouchsafe and further The Preferred Narrative.

These people do no speak English, they use English words, but the gap is far wider than the gap between a Yank and a Brit talking about picking up some fags and a joint, the gap is the gap between intellect and fantasy.

Just as no amount of scientific evidence is sufficient to even dent the armour and beliefs of a Creationist, not amount of fact, logic or integrity is sufficient to dent the armour and beliefs of The Preferred Narrative.

Show an Ammonite fossil embedded in the cliffs of the Jurassic Coast to a Creationist and they will see further proof of the Creators cunning tests of faith of the merely mortal, show completely inexplicable (if the accusers account is true) factual evidence, and a complete and utter lack of any actual supporting evidence, to The Preferred Narrative, and they will merely see further proof of your extreme cunning and evil, and take everything as further proof and support of your accusers’ fantasies.

Meanwhile, The Preferred Narrative is constantly intoning the catechism, which is always the same, “The welfare of the child comes first” and “I have been doing this for 25 years” and “Why would women lie” (Nota Bene, there is no question mark after that last one, rather like why would God lie) and of course the usual ploy “You are clearly an intelligent man” which is designed to disarm you and give advantage to the far more intelligent skank ho or niggerz interrogating you.

No principle is too ridiculous or puerile to be added to The Preferred Narrative, no matter how preposterous and moronic, no matter how nebulous and unstable it renders the house of cards that is The Preferred Narrative, nothing is ever allowed to question the validity of anything about the house of cards, it is a sacred thing, and none, least of all falsely accused innocent men, may taint it in any way.

Should you be heathen enough to act as I and my extended family have acted throughout, which is to flatly refuse to endorse The Preferred Narrative at any time by being complicit in silence, then you will be treated with all the hate that a Creationist fundy zealot reserves for the scientist.

The Preferred Narrative cannot be educated, cannot be convinced, cannot be reasoned with, cannot be engaged with honour, cannot be met with dignity, cannot be rebuffed with fact or logic.

The Preferred Narrative is immutable, and sufficient unto itself.

The Preferred Narrative is incredibly strong, resilient, powerful and vengeful simply because its very nature and existence is at stake at every moment of every day… every stone in The Preferred Narrative is a keystone… destroy any single stone and the whole house of cards comes tumbling down, which is why you as a man and a father can destroy every single stone in the arch, and The Preferred Narrative will still be worshipping the stunning beautiful and elegant bridge, which grows exponentially in size and grandeur in an exact inverse relationship to actual fact.

The Preferred Narrative can, with ease, studiously ignore and gloss over mutually exclusive accusations, such as you being both a Heroin Addict with no history of any kind of medical intervention or criminal activity, and a raging alcoholic who consumed 50 pints of beer a day, with no history of any kind of medical intervention or criminal activity.

The Preferred Narrative can, with ease, studiously ignore and gloss over mutually exclusive disorders, such as you being both a predatory paedophile interested in buggering your own pre-school age kids, and a mass rapist of adult females, and addicted to fetishes such as BDSM, and addicted to wildly deviant sexual acts such as bestiality… as some sort of Renaissance Man of deviancy.

The Preferred Narrative can, with ease, studiously ignore the vast amounts of time and resources that the police high tech computer forensic unit spent poring through all your computers, without even being able to find an illegal mp3 of Metallica (reason alone enough for seizure and destruction) and then being forced to hand back 100% of your seized IT equipment intact, and still turn around and say that your skank ho ex’s allegations that your computers were full of child and animal pornography are in fact true.

The Preferred Narrative can, and does, with ease, brand every single thing that does not support and enhance The Preferred Narrative as a filthy lie, and further proof of the man’s evil nature and unsuitability to ever be allowed any contact with his children.

The Preferred Narrative is, quite aptly, The Queen from Alice in Wonderland, well versed and practised in believing at least six impossible things before breakfast every day… including the verity of all your skank ho ex’s accusations.

Nay, in fact, the very act of believing six impossible things about the falsely accused men before breakfast every day is the fundamental requirement and core tenet of The Preferred Narrative, and the greatest unspoken secret of all is that while men may be vile and evil, the greatest of all evils is the apostate, bad enough that an unbeliever dare ridicule The Preferred Narrative, should one of their own fail to demonstrate in every word of every report an unfailing belief in The Preferred Narrative, then they are made a non-person… they simply cease to exist.

Follow the fucking money.

99.9% of all human beings are the same, the differences we see between individuals and sexes all fits into that remaining 0.1%

The difficulty we have as individuals is in divining specific differences within that 0.1%, for instance whether AWALT or NAWALT is true, both must fit in that 0.1%, and still leave room for EVERYTHING else that differentiates one human being for another.

If you are having difficulty with this, consider that fact that Human and Chimp DNA is 95% the same, the other 5% is responsible for everything.

Human beings also hate the idea that as individuals the concept of individuality and free will is basically moot… I have been separated from one of my kids since it was in nappies (I a deliberately avoiding stating the sex or anything else) and now the skank ho ex is exasperated because the kid fucking hates cream, eats the chocolate from inside bourbons and leaves the biscuit itself, and several other things, all of which are IDENTICAL to me as a child…

The brain is largely along for the ride, and “selling” DNA and environmental predispositions as self made choices, which gets interesting when you look at people with addictive personalities, habitual thieves, habitually violent people, habitual liars, and just for the feminist skank ho’s, habitual sex offenders….

When I was a child it was thought that being homosexual or being left handed was learned behaviour, and you could be trained out of it, now we go the other way, to the other extreme, lying to the police about being raped is a hormonal problem, and the liar is both a victim and sufferer…

I find this with the Internet Dating game, an appalling number of people claim to want to find Mr Right, while studiously ignoring the fact that Mr Right would find anyone who trashed a marriage because as it says on your profile you “needed your own space” utterly fucking appalling, disgusting and degenerate… so anyone who accepts you is by definition anything BUT that which you claim to seek.

Lots of MRA guys glibly dismiss this as the wimminz rationalisation hamster driving the wheel at 900 RPM, and in doing so they utterly miss a fundamental truth about all human beings, and wimminz and skank ho’s too.

That it is the tiniest possible variations in incredibly minor aspects of each individual that make the difference between the wonderful person and the hateful person, and that most of these tiny variations are largely programmed in by DNA, in conjunction with programming during the formative first five years of life.

Should you accept the evidence of your eyes and ears and mind and all that is around you, and accept this hypothesis as a solid working hypothesis, that choice is largely illusory, and far less extensive or long lasting that we like to think,  then prepare yourself for some very rough and unpleasant truths indeed.

It means that your skank ho ex did not choose to be that way, she was made that way, which means hating her is as pointless as hating the rain for making you wet… it also means trying to change her is as pointless as trying to make the rain give you a sun tan…

Think about that.

She perhaps has a choice of WHO to fuck over, but she simply is not a nice person, she has to fuck SOMEONE over, leopards and spots, the cliches are there for a reason.

If she is made this way, then every single strategy that attempts to deal with her nature is doomed to fail, it’s like giving counselling to a pig.

If she is made this way, then a lot of other things also suddenly have, of necessity, to contain more than a grain of truth, so along with observable differences between wimminz and men, we have observable differences between races, we have observable differences between nations, we have observable differences between ages, we even have observable difference between people with different belief systems and diets.

AND NONE OF THESE DIFFERENCES ARE ELECTIVE… you can’t change any living individual into anything but what they are and what they were born.

You see where this is going?

Were about three logical and inevitable progressions away from saying, “Hey, Hitler was right!” except maybe he got the bit about Jews wrong, he should have eradicated all the lawyers instead… but you start to get into really cloudy water then, because Hitler didn’t hate the jews, sure, he signed the policy, but it wasn’t his idea, and it didn’t focus on the jews, it hated all non caucasians equally, and he did hate lawyers.

Which is exactly what everyone wants, you’ve just been Godwin’d, since these deductions lead to answers that have something in common with some stuff the Nazis did, these deductions are evil and wrong.

Science doesn’t work like that, just ask the german rocket scientists that sent Aldrin to the moon, or the guys who designed the aerodynamics of the ME109, or the guys who designed the Autobahns, or hell, ask IBM, who supplied enough equipment and expertise to the Nazi party.

There was a famous quote interview with a serial killer, he was asked why he stabbed his 5th victim, his answer “I didn’t have a hammer” because he killed the rest with a hammer see…

The point is, he was going to kill, no matter what, the method and tools used are irrelevant to the killer, the killing is the thing.

NOT supplying tooling to make mini guns to crazed despots doesn’t make them nice people, or reduce the number of people they kill, Robert Mugabe has hardly fired a bullet in anger, yet his economic policies do quite nicely what Stalin did with the 9mm pistol round… lack of Intel i7 CPU’s has not transformed North Korea into a workers paradise.

This is what happens when you ignore the facts and science and start acting and making policy on beliefs and wishes.

Giving wimminz the vote has ALWAYS been the death of the society that does it.

Fiat currencies have ALWAYS been the death of economies that allowed it.

and these things happen because the devil is always in the tiny details, and everyone simply ignores all the tiny details as being far too tiny to be of any importance, and yet it is always the tiny details that not merely make a difference, but actually define the greater whole and determine its nature.

a tiny detail like a right to a fair and public trial makes the difference between Stalin and Pol Pot and Kim Jung and dubya and Obama and Blair and so on, and leaders who nobody knows the names of in places like Switzerland and Belgium and France and Norway.

it is always, always, always, in the tiny details that everything in life is decided.

it is in the tiny details that your choice of a mate should be decided, is this just a skank ho to fuck and forget, or is it just possibly a decent woman, and one of those tiny details may well be what will the laws be in your country of residence in five years time?

In the UK we introduced a little know law that changed the age of legal consent to have sex from 16 to 18… not many people know about it, they think that anyone who is 16 or over can consent to have sex with anyone else who is 16 or over.

But the age of consent is 18, if there is ANY kind of previous relationship between the two people, like a Former pupil, who left school at 16 and THEN had sex with their old teacher, or a former girlfriends daughter, who after you split up with the mother decides to have sex with you, or even your mates slightly younger sister, who you were once asked to “babysit” a couple of years ago.

All these and far more circumstances mean that the person below 18 cannot legally give consent, so it is statutory rape, no defence possible, and the tiny tiny tiny detail that you want to watch here is the one about “any kind of previous relationship” meaning anything where there was any kind of power differential at all…

… which to the wimminz and niggerz, means, or soon will, any man anywhere, because in the patriarchy being a man means you have power over the wimminz, so as soon as you speak to them, to chat them up, you are forming that power differential relationship, so then when you have sex, even if they instigate it, you are guilty of statutory rape.

In the spirit of full disclosure, I found out about this law when the police tried to nail me with it, unfortunately for the feminazi misandric skank ho police officer, the chick in question was 18 before the law came into force… that was the first I fucking heard of it, but the cunts would have charged me with statutory rape even though the girl herself stated she was 17 when we met and first fucked, in a country where the age of consent is alleged to be 16… and the cunts have moved along some since then and refined their technique and pushed the wedge in further to enlarge the definition of “any relationship” and “power disparity” as part of an ongoing process.

You’d better not fuck anyone less than 18, no matter what….. tiny tiny tiny details, playing the percentages, the tiny tiny ones that all hide in that 0.1%

I do not wish to mock the afflicted, but sometimes ridiculing people for their stupidity is the simplest and quickest way to educate them, shades of the fable about the Emperor with no clothes.

No names and no pack drill, but there is a certain commenter on The Spearhead who vehemently believes in “the illuminati” and “secret cabals” and “master plans.”

I get where he is coming from, look at my own False Rape Accusation made as integral part of a separation and child custody battle, two years and counting of everyone (95% female) involved getting it consistently ass backward as possible, what else could it possibly be except incompetence or corruption, and since nobody can be that stupid, it has to be corruption, it has to be policy, right? right? RIGHT?

Well, no…

When all the daffodils sprout and flower at the same time, we do not accuse them of being in a cabal, when all the bluebells come out 4 weeks early together, we do not accuse them of being part of the illuminati, when all the lambs are born within a couple of weeks of each other we do not accuse them of being part of some master plan.

All these seemingly directed and concerted and co-ordinated events just happen because the conditions are right for them to happen.

Worldwide slut marches appearing within a couple of weeks of the first one does not require any co-ordination, co-operation or even intelligent decision, all it requires is the correct conditions and the event in question will spread virally, not intellectually.

My False Rape Accusation and subsequent separation and custody battle rolling on for two years yet consistently getting the whole thing ass backward and painting the instigator as the victim does not require either system wide incompetence (though it helps.. lol) or system wide corruption, the illuminati, master plans or anything else…. all it requires is that the conditions are right for such things to flourish.

And boy do they ever, over at the False Rape Society (link on the top right of this page) they don’t talk about anything else except False Rape Accusations, and they simply do not have the staff or manpower to publish more than one or two stories a day, which doesn’t even begin to scratch the surface of the problem.

It does not take an illuminati to steer human society in such a way that these things happen, any more than it takes the hand of god intervening to ensure that all the daffodils come out together, and if you actually start using your fucking brain and looking, you will see that they don’t, get in your car and drive 250 miles north to a different climate and the daffs come out a week or two later, drive the other way to a different country and the horrors of feminism manifest themselves on a timescale a few years advanced or retarded from your own… all it requires is that the conditions are right for such things to flourish.

Now, what do we do about it?

Well, again, if we start punishing individual false rape accusers, it is a bit like cutting the heads of individual daffodils, it doesn’t do a damned thing to change the conditions in which they flourish…

To do that, we need to roll back ALL the changes in rape and sexual assault legislation to around 1970, and in practical terms that is rather like sitting in a field full of daffodils and stating that all you need to do is roll back the climate to (northern hemisphere) January 12th, and everything will be fine…

NOT.   GOING.   TO.   HAPPEN.

Get realistic, you can’t roll anything back, you can’t un-ring a bell, or put humpty-dumpty back together… that’s WHY we used to teach children nursery rhymes, to educate them, to teach them that time and entropy are a one way street.

What you CAN do is roll things forwards.

You CAN do this because you are not working against a directed effort of the illuminati, all you are working against is the momentum of society, and all you have to do is analyse the current conditions, and come up with a suitable viral infection that will anticipate the trends in conditions, spread, and become a pandemic.

This actually isn’t a big deal, “hoover”, to give just one example, “iphone” to give another, here in the UK in the political scene AV (alternative vote) is a classic example of a flop, a virus that wasn’t suited to conditions, which shouldn’t have been a surprise since David Owen tried basically the same thing in the seventies with the then Liberal / Social / Democrat party…

Just like the daffs, you need appropriate conditions to breed political change, look at Lech Walesa and the Solidarity movement in Poland for an excellent example of how the tiniest possible amount of viral infection is sufficient, IF CONDITIONS ARE RIGHT, to spread, become pandemic, and to bring about major change.

The advance of feminism is therefore not some grand design by the illuminati or anyone else, but merely the spread of several similar viral plagues, and it has to be said that in real terms to society as a whole these are all rather mild viral plagues, and given time they make their changes in society as a whole. (we can draw further accurate analogies to successive viral infections weakening and changing an individual)

AS society evolves, the viral plagues that are feminism must also evolve, the white feathers campaign simply would not work today, the conditions are wrong.

So, let’s take all that we have discussed so far, and move on and draw some logical and inevitable and unavoidable conclusions…

We can’t roll back, but we can go forwards, and if the right (for our needs as men) social viral meme is created at the right time in the right conditions, then we will effect major social change, and in effect roll the climate clock forwards to next spring and conditions where the daffs will no longer flower.

While specifying, designing or creating that particular viral meme is the 64 million dollar question (even I am not that smart… lol) we can nonetheless, like scientists, come up with a broad description of what it will look like, and make some educated guesses about its nature.

1. It is a reasonable assumption that the economy is going to be a factor, wimminz employed in useless jobs, divorced dads giving up work, the financial and social cost of criminalising non-payment of alimony, etc.
2. It is a reasonable assumption that broken homes and kids raised in broken homes by wimminz are going to be a factor.
3. It is a reasonable assumption that western societal dissatisfaction with the fading of our industrial might versus the rising might of previously impoverished nations will be a factor, see point #1 about the economy and balance of payments, for example the last plant that manufactured electrical cable in the UK closed last year, ALL our wire is now imported… this is just one small example.
4. It is a reasonable assumption that the internet (not just giving alternative views to many, but also giving voice to many) will be a factor, even if that factor is only to reduce the ability of societies to resist the spread of viral memes by differentiation, the internet makes for a monoculture, like bananas, all commercially grown bananas are Cavendish, and are all actually clones of the same single plant, with attendant problems, Cavendish bananas are getting ever more difficult to grow successfully, conditions are changing, viral and parasitic vectors are evolving to prey upon Cavendish bananas.
5. It is a reasonable assumption that we are entering an era where global resource wars are inevitable, it can be argued that Iraq and Afghanistan etc are nothing more than oil wars.

So where does this leave us? With five basic assumptions that this meme virus is going to exhibit, the economy, single parent families, fading industrial supremacy, the internet, and global resource wars… doesn’t take a brain surgeon or rocket scientist to be able to draw lots of interconnected lines between those…

Kids raised in single parent households by wimminz aren’t about to fight for countries or societies that they feel they have no stake in, or work themselves up the career ladder at Intel, or want to pay any taxes to support other wimminz or keep men who don’t pay alimony in prison.

Equally, because this meme virus MUST survive in the extant conditions of the society of today and the future, we can be pretty certain that characteristics that it will exhibit will NOT be for example a parallel to the suffragette movement, a major further push for wimminz “rights”, the days of the wimminz pandemic virus meme are over for quite some time, all we will see is an ongoing series of milder epidemic wimminz virus memes, such as the current slutwalk crap.

We can speculate, and say that with the worsening economy the government may decide that in 2012 ALL burglary and theft = prison sentence (shades of this beginning as we speak actually) and due to the limited resources of the prison service ALL non payment of alimony and minor domestic stuff is dealt with by other means (NOT fines, because non payment of fines = prison time) such as perhaps community works.

We can speculate, look at the uprisings in Egypt and Libya, watch dominoes fall, and see that the first western society to make major changes will trigger a rush to follow suit.

We can speculate, and say that the increasing burden of balance of payments deficits when everything is imported will spur a resurgence in local industrial production, which requires workers, which requires an educational system (you can’t lay brick unless you master mathematics… how many bricks and how much cement for a cavity wall 30 foot by 18 foot?) which requires pupils who learn, which requires traditional nuclear families with two parents as a minimum, and ideally a constellation of aunts and uncles and cousins and grandparents to boot, all achievable with the stroke of a pen re-writing tax breaks and state benefits.

We can speculate, and say that with increasing poverty, individual single parent wimminz households on their own plot of land are unsustainable, and financial pressures will force the move to Russian style high density communal housing.

We can speculate, and say that with the ever increasing technological needs of society, when even your average cop on the street is backed up by ever increasing quantities of ever higher tech stuff, it will become a matter of national security to have an educated and intellectual (eg male) workforce… today the London police announced the purchase of suspect tracking and analysis software from the United States, think Hollywood CSi meets minority report, in another few years the only place to buy such software will be India or China, and that dog won’t hunt…. look at the stuxnet story… and sod the Police, do a stuxnet to FedEX or the Post Office or the National Grid or the Water Co or even Walmart, and you bring an economy to its knees overnight…. especially a western, no local stock, “just in time” economy…

So we can speculate, and assume with some significant degree of confidence, that this new meme virus will feature heavily the sentiment expressed by Carl Sagan, that we have a society built upon science and technology, being run by people who haven’t got a fucking clue about science and technology, and the inevitable end result is a major fuckup.

Like a Chernobyl, on sterioids, on western soil, or a Union Carbide (bhopal) on western soil, or Fukishima, but just “the big one” hitting the San Andreas, or just a return of the 1916 flu pandemic.

What we do know for certain is that nature abhors a vacuum, and nature evolves to fit every possible ecological niche, and then some, and that our much vaunted modern western technological society is as natural and as subject to natures whims as a bee colony.

If you, you reading this right now, wish to survive and prosper, you need to realise that there is no illuminati, no cabal, no global organisation of feminists, no master plan, no nothing except ongoing, developing and evolving sets of conditions in which some things flourish and other fade, and in which we ourselves are part of the ongoing story.

All there is are viral memes constantly evolving and trying every possible permutation in the ongoing evolution of the things that we call modern human society.

These memes are as uncontrollable as daffodils.

Welcome to chaos theory.

Celebrate with me, because NOTHING CAN POSSIBLY ENSURE INDIVIDUAL DESTRUCTION in this soup as much or as certainly as the stupid feminist idea that you are a precious fucking snowflake who is entitled to anything and everything required to stop the world so you can continue to be a precious snowflake come high summer.