Wimminz – celebrating skank ho's everywhere

July 19, 2014

I2R

Filed under: Wimminz — Tags: — wimminz @ 3:26 pm

I (current / amperes) squared, times resistance (ohms)

100 Amperes @ 100 Volts = 10,000 Watts

2 Amperes @ 5,000 Volts = 10,000 Watts

Wire of 5 Ohms resistance

100 x 100 = 10,000, 10,000 x 5 = 50,000, so you’ll get *nothing* out the other end, in fact, to get 10,000 Watts out the other end, you’ll have to put 10,000 + 50,000 = 60, 000 watts in one end, and you’ll get 84% transmission losses.

2 x 2 = 4, 4 x 5 = 20, so you’ll get 10,000 – 20 = 9,980 watts out the other end. You’ll lose less than a quarter of one percent to transmission losses.

In ZH today there is a story about how 9 substations being taken out would take the entire US grid down, I have mentioned here before that the number for the UK is 6 substations.

so… to transmit electrical power over long distances with minimal loss, high voltage beats high current every which way.

So… DC vs AC…

DC is *a* thing, Direct Current.

AC is NOT *a* thing, 50 Hz AC is one thing, 60 Hz AC is another thing, and 240 VAC is not the same as 240 VDC, nor is it the same as the RMS of 240, 240 / 1.4 = 170 VDC, nor is it the same as anything else, because AC gets you reactance and inductance and skin effects and a whole load of other fun stuff you don’t get with DC.

Part of AC is time, on a 60 Hz AC system the “rise time” from minimum voltage to maximum voltage is 1/2 second, rise time is “rate of change”

Almost everything, most especially everything that is a semiconductor, has a rate of change sensitivity, eg a voltage change of X over 1 second won’t damage it in the slightest, the exact same voltage change of X in 0.0001 second will fry it, dead.

So, you see, it is complex, the AC v DC argument isn’t as simple as frog up or frog down on a UK house / engineering brick.

Some of the things that make AC complex, such as reactance and inductance, also make it easier to deal with than DC, to change (from our opening example) between 100 and 5,000 volts with AC is trivially easy, just use a transformer, but to change between 100 and 5,000 volts with DC is complex, read, expensive.

But it’s not all roses, with DC, being DC, there is no “rise” time, so lots of other things are more robust, read, cheaper.

One of the big problems with DC is there is no “zero” point, as there is with AC, during which you can open or close a switch… 60 Hz AC has 60 “zero” points per second, when no current or power is flowing.

One of the big problems with AC is you can’t just connect two different systems, the “clocks” of their AC cycles have to be *exactly* synchronised, or vast amounts of power start flowing and things go bang.

3-phase works on this principle, each phase is 120 degrees or one third of a cycle, for 60 Hz this means one third of  second, out of sync with the next, by bridging between phase 1 and phase 2, or phase 2 and phase 3 in a three phase conductor you can get 220 volts, by bridging between phase 1 and phase 3, you can get 440 volts, if it is 440 V 3 phase.

With 3 phase you don’t just have one clock running at 60Hz (or 50 Hz in Europe etc), you have three, all exactly 1/3rd of a phase out of sync with each other.

DC doesn’t have any of these issues.

Stepping down from a 300,ooo Volt AC line to a domestic 200 VAC supply is no big issue.

Stepping down from a 500,000 Volt DC line to a domestic 24 VDC supply is problematical.

In human terms, DC makes the muscles lock, I used to work on massive DC battery bank systems up to 110 VDC in boats, old school stuff, and it was about a million times as lethal as taking a piss on to a live domestic AC power socket.

You also have to remember that back in the days of Edison and Tesla and Westinghouse, there was no such thing as a semi-conductor, my dad had an ex US army inverter, a *fucking* heavy steel box about the size of a 2 gallon can, you put 12 VDC in and got approximately 200 VAC out, at approximately 50 Hz,  inside the box was a DC motor directly coupled to an AC alternator, horribly inefficient, a purely mechanical power intermediate stage, DC power to mechanical motion, and mechanical motion to AC power, back in its day, an awesome piece of kit, because this was the *only* way you could do it.

This, in engineering terms, is the meaning of a legacy system, if you were going to build a national power grid today, you wouldn’t build what we have.

The problem with what we have, is that it is past its use by date, and trying to migrate it to a 21st century system is impractical in the F-35 all purpose but not very good at anything and spectacularly expensive to build and maintain sense.

As an aside, this also applies to our telephone / comms networks, our potable water networks, our sewerage networks, our rail networks, our gas (methane etc, not gasoline) networks, etc etc.

Building new networks is *spectacularly* expensive, Fed QE scale, but at least the money would have gone into the system, not the bankers pockets.

Building new networks means new suppliers and new components and new technologies, everyone working today is working with the old Victorian era shit, they aren’t going to re-tool and re-train on maybes, and in any event, they will want to own market shares, so there will be patent wars and “standards” that are just proprietary ways of locking other people out, rather than doing the job right.

The power grid is just one example, but it is a good one.

The *engineering* solution is to come up with an overall design and set of *engineering* standards that will last another hundred years, that means a fault resilient grid for starters, not one with master nodes that can cause cascade failures.

The *engineering* solution also means you just fucking ignore everything that isn’t a base load generator, eg able to work on demand 24/7/365, so with the exception of hydro all that other shit is out, in grid terms, sure, feed it into small local nodes if you want, but not the grid.

The *engineering* solution means you need a smart network, not a dumb one, at present if say London goes dark, you can’t just plug London back in, the sudden load is too great, and you have no way of turning off all those televisions and refrigerators and water heaters and so on that are just sat there, connected in the “on” position to a dark network, waiting for power…. You need to not just connect localities one at a time, but loads within localities, so not just “OK, bring Marylebone back online”, but “OK, Bring Marylebone street lighting, traffic signals, and hospitals back on line….. waits 360 seconds, OK, now bring on the Domestic lighting circuits”

The *engineering* solution means you don’t get to connect to this new grid, unless all your shit is smart, with a smart central controller, so when the power goes out it shuts off everything in the house, and when the power comes back on it waits until the network tells it that it can now energise up to 300 watts of purely resistive loads, so lights only, no inductive loads like fridge compressors, wait for the signal.

The *engineering* solution says you have a smart system, the smart thing to do is include a UPS, say 250 Ah of 48 VDC (about 8 truck batteries) which itself knows what loads to prioritise, so the 1 watt GU10 LED lights are top priority, the electric kettle and kitchen sockets bottom priority… the smart home system can talk to the smart fridge freezer to monitor how long it can go with the door shut and keep everything fresh….

… “internet of things” sounding familiar yet?

The *engineering* solution is that if we had a grid capable of it, electric cars or true hybrid (no mechanical drive-train) would make more sense, and electric trucks, and so on, and if your electric car is at home, and your home is the suburban home with your own driveway and off road parking, well, that just adds battery capacity to the home UPS, which could at a push on demand feed power into the grid….

Back in WW2 a british destroyer provided the mains electric for a whole indian city.

A true hybrid truck putting out 100 BHP from the generator side of things is 100 x 746 = 74 kW, a street of 100 houses all with true hybrid cars, 30 of whom are home at the time, all putting out 15 BHP from the generator side is 30 x 15 x 746 = 335 kW, third of a megawatt right there.

Not what you would want to be doing long term for efficiency or environmental reasons, but it would fucking *work* while the main grid supply was offline…. and it’s not like the smart systems wouldn’t be able to credit you for the energy used once the downtime was past.

Trouble is, human nature being what it is, nobody is going to build *any* of that stuff while the current grid is up and running.

Trouble is, if the current grid stops running, so does society.

It’s a problem, there is a hole in my bucket, dear Liza…

What we need, they say, is a war, a big one, that takes down the grid and a lot of other legacy shit too, lot of collateral damage and dead bodies in that though.

But, we are still talking about acts of MALICE (as in the ZH article) taking down what we have now.

If there is *anything* you should be taking away from the stuff I write about my day job it is that no acts of malice are required, simple nickel and dime-ing management practices are quite sufficient, all by themselves, to achieve EXACTLY the same effect, and unlike supposed acts of malice, management practices such as these are real and happening every, single, day….

A terrorist event, or an act of god event, they are *****IF***** events.

Management practices causing something to fall below stall speed, they are *****WHEN***** events.

It doesn’t matter one fuck if it is a $1 bullet, or $1 saved on a component or maintenance, they are just triggers, you’ll still be in the dark, and it won’t make the ***slightest*** fucking difference to you that it was $1 saved on a component and not some terr-rist with a $1 bullet that put you there.

Just to be totally fucking clear, terrists and other assorted assholes MIGHT cause it, it all depends, but current business and management practices WILL cause it, absolutely fucking certainly and without any doubt whatsoever gau-ron-fucking-teed.

Worrying about terrists is like worrying about developing the symptoms of lead poisoning after you take a bullet.

What you need to remember, sitting there in the dark, so you won’t be reading this or anything else, because it will all be gone, is this…

By fucking definition, the people and practices that put you there, are, by fucking definition, the least qualified or likely of all people and practices on the entire fucking planet, to fix it.

You’ll need people like me, and boy, our price is going to be fucking brutal, and the above people and practices in red, they’re the new Jews, and we’re the new Dr Mengele’s, and if anything that is understating the case.

It ain’t just a case of charging or demanding what we want, and expecting to be treated like the fabled 0.1% today…. oh no… unless the price is so high it breaks your body and soul and spirit, it isn’t high enough.

Payback’s a bitch, but then, so is physics.

June 12, 2014

I’ve talked before…

Filed under: Wimminz — Tags: , , — wimminz @ 3:20 pm

…and I wanna talk some more… about energy.

I have previously on here mentioned the young lad who hops on a Honda C90 and rides to as far away places as the arctic circle and the middle east.

85cc, 8 bhp, 50 mph top speed, 4 litre fuel capacity giving 90 odd miles range, 90 kilos with fluids topped off.

A top pro cyclist can output 400 watts, few can aspire to that, a labourer is usually outputting 75 watts for his 8 hour day.

The measly Honda C90 puts out a measly 8 bhp PEAK, 8 x 746 =5,968 watts, it’s putting out about 3,000 watts at 30 mph, the equivalent of 7.5 top pro cyclists, or 40 labourers, and the labourer is the better benchmark because the little Honda will do that all day every day for as long as you like.

It takes a man who could walk maybe 40 miles a day, Roman legionnaire style, if the roads were good enough, and allows him to travel over a significant proportion of the globe, and do at least 400 miles a day, and carrying his own body weight again in gear.

DMJ in his post apocalyptic novel missed a trick, the survivors on mechanical transport will be running Honda C90’s, and nothing else… except maybe the odd wood gasifier 4 wheel job, or a cow/pig/chicken shit methane eater, but they will be rare.

I will freely admit, my modern socket 2011 i7 PC sips power compared to the 300 MHz Pentium 2, and delivers *vastly* more computing power, I will also freely admit that my Samsung SGS3, Note2 and Note 10.1 all sip power, all wonderfully efficient things. LED lighting, wonderfully efficient… Even my Giant 46″ Samsung LED TV uses less power than an old 14″ green phosphor monitor.

But there it ends.

Back in the day, Lister made a 6 horsepower single cylinder diesel engine, unlike the little honda that displaces 85 cc, the Lister was nearly 1.5 litres, and everything else weighed accordingly, 300 lbs of flywheels etc, nobody cared, it wasn’t a mobile engine, it was a stationary engine, and massive construction = long life, low stress, minimal vibration, very smooth.

They coupled this engine, via twin vee belts, to a 4 pole 240 volt AC generator, capable of outputting 2.5 kW peak/continuous, it was the same thing to the old Lister.

What made this a trick, was they added a DC circuit to the alternator, eg added a dynamo, that and a few relays, you ran the DC through the mains circuit, when the user closed a switch to turn on the electrically powered item, this closed a rely on the lister, that took DC from the batteries to use the now DC motor in the alternator to spin the big diesel lump up, and when up to speed the DC was taken out of the mains circuit and 220 VAC was put in… and when the customer turned the switch off on the electrically powered item, this prompted “no load” on the alternator, and after a few seconds of this  relay shut the rack down on the injector pump on the lister, and when it span back down, back to DC sensing on the mains circuit.

This then, was called the Start-o-matic, and it was hugely popular, but it didn’t sell to houses much, it sold to farms, farms in every country in the world, and the electric light it brought to those farms was incidental, it brought mains power for everything else, well pumps, refrigeration, shearing machines, power tools in the workshop, you name it.

2,500 watts.

Eventually they replaced the 6/1 engine on the startomatic with the 8/1, and the alternator on that would output 3,500 watts, heady days.

If I bought a car in my youth, chances are it would be producing 40 to 50 bhp, BMC A & B series engines and so forth, get medieval and buy a 3.5 litre Rover V8 based on the Buick block and an awesome 155 bhp was on tap.

Harley big twins were still 74 cubes, and plenty people arguing that 74 cubes was too much, not as nice as the 60 cube motors, same shit was being said of Triumph when they put the twins from 650 to 750, and the fucking Norton 850’s shook everything off every 50 miles, hell there were even jokes, as Triumph had gone to 750cc and unit construction and BSA A10 were still 650 and pre-unit, and a *lot* smoother, about Triumph riders being turned away from the blood donor rooms because their blood was too frothy.

Then the Harley’s went to 80 cubes, and the only good thing about that was the promo (put another six inches between your legs) and now from the factory they are 100 inches…. Not to be outdone the japs are now making 1,900cc vee twins, and the cunts riding them are more limp wristed than we were as youths, when frankly a 1 litre motorcycle engine was all but pointless…

Meanwhile things like the Suzuki 650 single Savage, a frankly lovely little bike, are seen as “a girl’s bike”…. WTF????

In short, what we TODAY take for granted as a “normal” personal energy budget, whether it be the electricity supply to our homes, how many horsepower our vehicles have, etc etc, is, even when compared to what was “normal” 30 years ago when I was a young man, completely fucking outrageous…. as indeed was *my* energy budget as a young man, compared to my dad, when he was my age, jack the lad he was, with his 500 cc ohv single Rudge, the only person more jack the lad was his mate Bob, but Bob’s family was loaded, so Bob had a Vinnie black prince… dad bought his own bike.

For a short while I toyed with a home build Z1000 bored to 1200 and with a turbo with eeeek boost fitted, I can tell you for a fact those old Z bottom ends would handle 200+ bhp / 25 mpg no sweat, I can also tell you after shredding a ducati04082701brand new rear tyre in one 120 mile journey of normal ish riding, I sold it, to a guy who ran Ford cortina square section car tyres on the rear end, cornering was even worse, but at least he had some rubber left on the tyre and not just the road… I went from that back to a “mere” 74 bhp / 60 mpg from this lump.

Meanwhile, boiling 2 pints of water in an electric kettle uses exactly the same energy as it did when my parents got one for a wedding present just after the war.

A 1 kW bar electric fire uses exactly the same energy as it did in 1950, and a 60 watt incandescent bulb ditto.

But the essential difference even back then as a callow yoof was the same as it is today, travel astride something exposed to the elements, or carry your own armchair, heater, air con, stereo and weatherproof box everywhere so you can travel in the same comfort and attire as sitting here on my sofa typing this, the latter vastly increases the energy requirement.

Nothing else has changed.

But it *could* have….

In my workshop I have a 1.5 kW one “bar” quartz tube heater, one of the pukka ones, most of the output is infra red, I still find myself reluctant to use the fucker, because it is hard to relate the heat output to the energy consumption, it looks sorta like a 1 bar electric fire, but the heat output is prodigious, 10 feet away from a bar fire I can barely feel anything on my skin, I can sense it with my face, but there is no actual warmth, 10 feet away from this thing it is like sunbathing in summer on the beach… waaaaarrrrmmmth… ten minutes later you start to sweat…. it is efficient because it heats ME, not the air around me.

Same with cars, ALL the energy expended in making them move is shed by converting it to heat, and the 50 bhp car of my yoof that is now 100 bhp, well yes, there is more safety shit to drag around, but also, the bulk of that extra goes on performance

The A60 austin cambridge I used to drive as a boy had 60 bhp, 24 seconds 0-60, the car outside (same engine capacity) now does 0-60 in under 11 seconds…. there isn’t actually any NEED for double the acceleration of the old A60, sure, I *use* it, tyres and diesel cost me nothing, but I don’t *need* it…. and if I was paying for tyres and diesel I wouldn’t be using it.

That was the old lesson from the blown zed thou, beyond a certain sedate point, fuel energy is used to chew up tyres and brakes, I really can’t remember the numbers or anything else except the conversation itself now, but one of my customer back in the day was a 747 pilot, before that he used to fly English Electric Lightnings, RAF interceptor squadron, I do remember him telling me that could drink fuel far faster than a jumbo, and I don’t remember the numbers, but when he said far faster he meant a LOT.

As an aside this guy was telling me that when BAE was testing the Concorde in the early 80’s, they offered it to various air forces as a test target, so the yanks brought F14/15/16 and Starfighters to the party, the French turned up with Mirages, but one of the lightnings from his squadron was the only plane able to make an intercept, but then they would do runway to 39,000 feet in 3 minutes.. >;*)

So, from the time when my dad was a boy, to when I was a boy (for variations of boy that mean under 20 but old enough to drive) it went from only the very very few having a 50 bhp motorcycle, to anyone who wanted one having a 50/60/70/80/90 bhp motorcycle.

And from when I was a boy, when only pub landlords and police had a 155 bhp car, to anyone who wants one having 150/200/250 on up bhp cars, I know a guy who just bought a used VW phaeton v10, chipped, a 400 bhp diesel car FFS.. he paid ten grand for it.

Even the fucking VW up, a one litre three cylinder jobbie, chucks out 60 bhp, and that’s not even “a girls car” it is a motorised shopping trolley.

Nobody, but nobody, but nobody, gives a fuck about efficiency.

Profligacy is the name of the game.

95% of what we call our current, normal, western standard of living is in fact nothing more than profligate personal energy expenditure on a scale that would have been simply unimaginable when I was a boy.

I have said this time and time and time again, the per capita energy budget of a nation denotes the technological progress and status of that nation, nothing else counts.

sure, we could *probably” maintain today’s standard of living and achieve and 30-40% cut in this current per capita energy budget (a 30-40% cut with no gains in efficiency would take us back to 1980, no internet, no personal computing, no mobile phones, no digital equipment) by going balls out for efficiency anywhere and everywhere we could…

the *average* standard car factory alternator is rated at 70 amperes… 70 x 12 = 840 watts, over a bloody horsepower, just to charge the 12 volt system…and run all those incandescent or xenon lights, and that 200 watt stereo, and move the windows up and down, and run the video game console instruments…

30 second 0-60 times are good enough.

regenerative braking could be done today, and do away with the engine powered alternator altogether as a by product.

every single vehicle could be factory speed limited to 50 mph

all lighting could be LED

There is just no will, and no awareness of what could be done, today, with today’s technology, not tomorrow’s unfeasible magical unicorn solutions.

 

%d bloggers like this: