Wimminz – celebrating skank ho's everywhere

August 12, 2011

….of sealing wax and string

Filed under: Wimminz — Tags: , , , , , , , — wimminz @ 1:07 pm

As the old saying goes regarding how to tell if a man is honest, you ask him, if he says “Yes.” then he isn’t.

Personally I’d have to answer that question “I try to be / mainly (shrugs and grins) trouble is, most people don’t want you to be…”

Which brings us neatly to today’s subject, wimminz and honesty…

I have a really great record for finding chicks, fucking their brains out, the best sex they ever had, then walking away and never hearing from or being hassled by them again. Now just last week a mate asked me the secret, after his phone SMS notification went for the third time in an hour from the same skank, and I told him, “Be 100% honest with her.”

He then said he was honest with them, and I pointed out that there is a difference between not telling any lies, and telling some unpleasant truths.

Remember, wimminz like teh romance, and what is romance except a set of carefully crafted illusions and dreams, e.g. purest lies and bullshit.

Remember, wimminz see everything in terms of their image, e.g. how they think other wimminz will perceive them, which is a recipe for schizo city any day of the week because it is a constantly changing morass.

So all I have to do is tell the wimminz all the unpleasant “truths” (that matter to wimminz) about me, of course in a laughing and contemptible tone of voice and manner, like “A psycho skank ex falsely accused me of being a paedo as part of a divorce/custody battle that went nuclear on day one.”

Nota bene, telling wimminz the psycho skank ho ex falsely accusing you of being a violent rapist will not necessarily put these wimminz off you, it may have the opposite effect… beware… lol

Instantly the skank starts thinking, what if, doesn’t matter how remote or unlikely, what if… because that is how wimminz minds work.. want to sell a wimminz a new car, point out that the old one is associated with downtrodden housefraus.

It is most important you get the skank to verbalise something, that it is just a tiny bit worrying for her, that another wimminz said that about you.

Which gives you the intro to deliver the coup-de-grace, which is the “Obviously only a complete fucking idiot would believe such a thing, I mean a complete fucking no brain air head, I mean, what are the chances that I would be walking around as free as a bird, especially in this day and age of CSI forensics”

And your parting shot is “.. and frankly I’m fucking disgusted and insulted by your lack of faith (over ride their hand waving and protestations of innocence) and far from you not trusting me, I don’t fucking trust anyone with such a complete lack of judgement. We’re through. So long and thanks for all the fish.”

Now, my mate was a bit jaw agape, and as he pointed out, he hasn’t been accused of such things, and he is quite right, it is about absolute brutal honesty, and while that story is true for me it works, he needs to choose a story that is true for him, and it will work, and the root secret is the story MUST be about how you are telling this skank that an ex skank thought you were damaged goods and bad for her image.

This skank will instantly relate to the ex skank thinking you were bad for her image, and think maybe you might be bad for her image too, and you are instantly off the hook, permanently.

If your true story is as good as mine they won’t even return your calls, if you do not have a true story, invent one, wimminz lie all the fucking time anyway and it is the effect that counts. Just keep it simple, very very simple, and very very brief, and get the message across that an ex skank thought you were bad for her image, job done.

Only thing I will caution you about is this, ensure that this is a VERBAL conversation that takes place face to face ONLY, and make sure your demeanour is as casual and dismissive as if you were talking about something you saw on the TV last week. Do not put it in any medium that can be recorded electronically, especially if your true story is invented…

There is a HUGE fucking difference between causing the skank to be concerned about her image amongst other skanks if she associates with you, and causing the skank to be concerned about her safety if she associates with you… if you cross that line you are totally fucked and your next conversation may well be with the police.

My mate promptly dug up a true story from when he was 17 and got so drunk he shit himself while unconscious, and yesterday we had another coffee and I asked him how it went.

“Fucking magic” he said, he told her that an ex had dumped him because of his very rare and very infrequent irritable bowel syndrome because she didn’t want to be seen out with a guy who shit himself in public, and that as he had a slightly upset stomach he had been avoiding her for a day or two until it settled down, he said she said “I’m just going to the toilet” and he never saw her again, and he was so enthused he sent her a text, and she hasn’t even responded to that either.

So, having come full circle on that little story and top tip, we do need to address the whole subject of a man being honest with wimminz in all their dealings with them.

Wimminz do not want men to be honest, they fucking hate it, but they also fucking hate being lied to and used, so you have to be very careful in dealing with the airhead sex.

When chatting them up you should always stick to the 100% unvarnished truth, just masterfully steer the conversation into areas as discussed in the internet dating sections of this blog so you stay on safe and productive territory.

When with them you should also stick to the 100% unvarnished truth, and any conversation (or location) that can’t be ended by whipping your cock out and inviting her to suck it is to be avoided.

In both of the above it is not merely acceptable, but abso-fucking-lutely VITAL, that while you are telling the 100% unvarnished truth, you are also lying by omission, who needs the details, not the wimminz, they won’t ask, dating for wimminz is just checking some boxes and only a fool complicates it.

When ending it with them you also stick to the 100% unvarnished truth, but now you cut back on the omission, include some of the things your ex’s have SAID about you, or ACCUSED you of, but do take very great care to select things that are not true in fact…

for example.

“My psycho skank ex accused me of xxxxx”

She must have actually said that, but it must be something that you can trivially disprove.

“My psycho skank ex accused me of being a grumpy bastard who expected her to do the housework.”

Speaking personally, this would be true in both ways, true that she said it, and true that it is true of me, so this is definitely NOT one to choose.

You might find a wimminz who relishes that traditional role, and has been searching for a real man, and where will that leave you…..

The bottom line.

It is a fact that in modern western society, you as a man do not hold any of the cards, the wimminz do, so all your dealing with wimminz should be treated as though you a dealing with a superior (as in might, not right or intellect) adversary, so you need to outwit them at every turn, this is real world psyops guys, with real world consequences for forgetting your true status or fucking up, and the single most significant tool that the man has is a logical brain capable of consistent thought, and the single greatest weakness your opponent has is that a wimminz is a fucking airhead ruled by monthly biochemical changes and her perception of her own status amongst other wimminz.

Beating them by never ever telling a lie you can ever be caught out in, not even by the police or courts, should the wimminz decide to go nuclear on your ass, is the name of the game.

The flipside of this coin is that you must remember that you can never ever take anything a wimminz says as being either truthful, or something that she will not do a 180 on and deny ever saying at the drop of a hat.

Related articles

%d bloggers like this: