by Nat South for The Saker Blog
US carrier making waves on social media
A satellite image is doing the rounds of social media supposedly showing the US aircraft carrier ‘USS Ronald Reagan’ apparently ‘surrounded’ at a distance by at least seven Chinese warships (allegedly) on 24 September. More details are in this article by Sputnik. According to Chinese media, there were 5 Chinese warships, but this is all speculation as the ships are unidentified. The originator “Patient zero” is a user of Sina Weibo, with captions in Chinese. The image then was relayed across the world and MSM articles were written about the alleged incident. The US 7th Fleet has only responded in the vaguest of press statements, by saying that the carrier is “conducting routine operations”. The Chinese military, however, did respond in slightly different way, by stating that the US carrier was in the region to “flex the muscles and increase regional militarization”.
The actual numbers aren’t important, but the context and timing are noteworthy. Although the US Navy regularly transit through the South China Sea (SCS), often with missile cruisers and destroyers carrying out FONOPs, the image implies a terse naval face-off, judging by the speed of the ships. It is quite hard to tell what actually took place in this image and where is the actual location. Basic questions need to be asked, such as if the image was doctored, what day was it taken, how is it possible to ID the other unidentified ships?
The location was supposedly northeast of the Spratly Islands, other Chinese and OSINT sources suggest it is in the Philippine Sea. It is not likely that the aircraft carrier would be alone since it usually has some escorts on the surface and below the surface. Aircraft carriers are usually accompanied by other warships as a carrier group, CBG in naval parlance. (I know I sailed through one lot a decade ago in the Mediterranean, an epic event rendered difficult by them in darkened ship mode).
In the case of the ‘USS Ronald Reagan’, (Task Force 70), escorts are likely to include ‘USS Chancellorsville’, ‘USS Wayne E. Meyer’, ‘USS Gettysburg’ and ‘USS Antietam’, as well as USNS fleet oilers. The Amphibious Ready Group (ARG) headed by the ‘USS Boxer’ have just entered the region. The ‘USS William P. Lawrence’ was recently in the Philippine Sea.
If the incident is in the SCS, involving the Spratly Islands, this image tells an interesting story. An area that I personally studied over 20 years ago in the context of growing UNCLOS disputes and fisheries claims. A geopolitical hotspot with high stakes for access to lucrative seabed resources, (oil & gas). Here we are, moving on several decades, with a classic example of how territorial claims initially arising from “traditional fisheries areas” being progressively morphed into someone more worrying, by the addition of military might and pride, leading to increasing risks of clashes of this kind.
Briefly, the disputes are multifaceted and have been ongoing for many years. The issue of the South China Sea islands and reefs are numerous and complex, I won’t discuss these at length in this short analysis. Suffice to say, China has made long-standing claims over a number of these islands and regions, in what is commonly known as the 9 Dash Line, antagonising its ASEAN neighbours, ranging from Vietnam to Malaysia in the process. The US has weighed into these disputes with a strategy that it wants a “free and open Indo-Pacific”. Hence the numerous US Navy patrols in the air, sea and under the waves in the region.
Beijing is steadily claiming ownership and, in some areas, building military bases on man-made islands in order to substantiate the claims and establish zones of control over the EEZs. This situation is like a red rag to the proverbial bull in Washington, who have in response routinely send out warships on FONOPs as a means of short-lived escalations.
It isn’t the first time that an US aircraft carrier is sailing through the contested area of sea. But it worth to note the timing, in the run-up of the significantly huge celebrations to mark the 70th anniversary of the founding of the Peoples’ Republic. Was is it the intention of the US to cause a storm in a teacup? The fact that the US Navy remains tight lipped indicates an operation aimed at the highest political levels in Beijing, not for public distraction or MSM entertainment.
It has to be remembered that the Sea China Sea is a globally strategic trading seaway, with an estimated one third of international maritime trade going through the SCS. The region is critical for China as the second largest economy in the world as 64% of its trade passes through the SCS, which ties closely to China’s overall economic and military security. China is dictating a bit-by-bit shift in the regional status quo, by establishing zones of control, something that Washington regards as Chinese aggression. Ultimately, this boils down to the US trying to prevent Chinese anti-area/access-denial (A2/AD) of a whole swath of the region.
There were reports in July of a naval cat and mouse game played out in the SCS region, where the Chinese carrier, ‘Liaoning’ was allegedly to have prevented the passage of the ‘USS Ronald Reagan’. One example is given with a map of supposed ship movements. Nothing further was confirmed as to whether this actually. Similarly, to the event in the satellite image, both navies do square up to each other at times, yet this is largely unreported or acknowledged officially. However, the Chinese coastguard presence is visible to show its sustained presence in the southern contested parts of the SCS.
This alleged incident in the SCS is really a twist of bittersweet irony, as this time last year the USS Ronald Reagan made a port call to Hong Kong.
https://www.cpf.navy.mil/news.
This year, the world is witnessing escalation of wanton violence, destructive clashes and mob attacks in Hong Kong. What a shift in events as the US carrier visit was widely seen at the time as an easing of tensions between the U.S. and China. Not anymore.
This summer, the US Navy had originally scheduled 2 port calls to Hong Kong and in China in September, but these were cancelled by Beijing due to the protests and clashes.https://www.rt.com/
The last ship to visit was in April. Given the ongoing tensions, escalating trade war and geopolitical provocations, maybe the port call was historic.
https://mobile.navaltoday.com/
The neutron bomb that PRC tested with N Korea was designed to capture entire US carrier fleets offshore intact, to serve as booty and hostages. The China/Russia/N Korea axis excels in defensive weapons costing miniscule amounts whilst the great satan drowns itself in F35 and such obsolete attack weapons.
The Yellow Press of any country will fake or take out of context many photos. In this day and age with the ability to fake up pictures using computers , one should be wary of “shocking” images.
The Pillipines sold the Spratly Islands to China, or I should say, the Governor of that Provience sold the Islands to China. Working with (insider) Pillipinos learns ya all kinds of shit. The sale happened during the Aquino reign…….and yes, the Aquinos got their cut of the sale (sea fareing containers, filled with billions, likely trillions of pesos). That’s how things work in the Phillipines.
As a side note: Marcos found the Gold. He was funding the Pillipines social/infrastructure programs with it, among other things. The Yanks (hey it’s their war booty, right) eventualy found out and sent him on a oneway pre paid flight to Hawaii.
According to those in the know, Mrs Marcos housekeeper, Emilia said, “they got the rest of the Gold, but they never got the diamonds.”
Since the Bankers can create masses of money and manipulate price of gold etc, it is not hard to buy all that they feel they need?
Selling islands goes on all the time. Occupying them successfully is not easy and hiding the transaction suggests the Han know that it has dubious title?
I’d like to see joint Russian and Chinese “Freedom of Navigation” patrols through the Florida Straits between Cuba and the US. And off the coasts of Venezuela and Nicaragua.To make sure those waters are kept open for trading and not obstructed by any nation.I have a feeling the whining from the US would be deafening.
Sorry to break up the paradigm, but you do realize that the recently set up maritime trade route for Russian Oil and Natural Gas exports to India between inked by India and Russia passes right through the South China Sea and this was setup without any consultation with China by either Russia or India, and neither country will abide by China’s self declared ADIZ, Air Defense Identification Zone.
They’re going to fly the oil, are they? As friendly, more or less, powers with China, their shipping need fear no interference from China, and to assert it is even possible is bollocks.
What’s bollocks is your lack of understanding of the specific facts. It doesn’t matter if a country is friendly or not, China expects all to recognize their claims and consult with them.
Second fact you got wrong is that China and India are not friendly on territorial issues. But the real loss of face for China, or calling of the bluff by Russia is that friendly Russia has ruthlessly (and correctly) pursued it’s own self interest and refused recognize chinese claims. I think the reason is simple, Russia is not about to give anyone (including China) the ability to veto who Russia trades with or doesn’t trade with. Now that would be bollocks.
We can’t blame Russia for this, it’s China’s fault for making such an unsustainable and outrageous “exceptionalist” land (sea) grab. They may be able to push around small south east Asian countries, Russia, on the other hand, is different matter.
China has land borders with fifteen, if I recall correctly, neighbours, and had numerous territorial disputes from the era of Western Imperialism and before. All have been settled amicably, eventually, save with India. The Indian elites plainly suffer a gigantic inferiority complex seeing as they and China started out from similar bases in the late 40s, and China has thrived, whereas India, comparatively, has not. And India is in an economic mess right now, one of the bright spots being its burgeoning trade with China, of all places. Russia wishes friendly relations with both China and India, so does not take sides.
Your response has nothing to do with my posting, that speaks for itself.
Anaam:
Oil and gas tankers can fly now? No? Then what could the ADIZ possibly have to do with it? And the international shipping lanes in the SCS are open to all comers, just as they are everywhere else. Your comment is inane.
My simple posting seems to have triggered you. What is difficult for you to understand?
In addition to the sea route for oil tankers, which does not recognize chinese maritime claims (China was pointedly not consulted by Russia as well as India), neither country is going to respect China’s self appointed ADIZ. Don’t try to attribute meaning where none was implied, along the lines of “what you really meant to say is….”
Taking your final complaint first, I did no such thing. Your original comment is phrased such that it implies a connection between the oil/gas deal and the ADIZ, where none does nor can exist. If you did not intend that implication, so be it; but I am not to blame for your grammar. Also, FYI, all ADIZ’s are “self-appointed”; they are governed by no treaty or uniform framework, and each country decides for itself whose ADIZ it will or will not recognise. I do not claim to know India’s stance on China’s ADIZ; but if you say Russia will needlessly antagonise its most important strategic partner (or vice-versa for that matter), let alone over so banal a matter as a the authentication of air traffic, then I say you do not know what you are talking about.
Otherwise, it is you do not seem to understand how international maritime law and the freedom of navigation work. Whatever China may think of Russia and India’s trade deal (and I really can’t see it bothering them too much, they’re not losing anything by it), neither they nor anyone else needs permission from China, nor any of its competing claimants to assorted reefs and islands, in order to send ships through the South China Sea’s shipping lanes. Territorial exclusion zones extend only 12 nautical miles (22.2 km) from the coast of any sovereign territory, whether mainland or island, and that is not where the shipping lanes are. Exclusive economic zones, which extend a maximum 200 nautical miles, are a separate issue, and have nought to do with transitory shipping.
My grammar was fine : I used the term “maritime trade route”, that is clearly shipping by sea (so much for your understanding), I did not write “air transport trade route”, in addition to the maritime trade route I then added: “and neither country will abide by China’s self declared ADIZ”. That term (“and”) clearly separated the two issues. It was you who twisted the meaning.
Regard ADIZ, and your opinion that Russia will not “needlessly” antagonize a partner, etc, that’s your take, however, when it comes to principles Russia has shown they define what is needless what is not needless, not you. As for antagonizing China, they don’t hesitate when it comes to keeping their own foreign policy options open for the future: Russia does not recognize either south Korea’s ADIZ off the Korean coast nor China’s ADIZ over the East China Sea. In addition with respect to the South China Sea, Russia has begun natural gaz exploration within the 9 dash line area claimed by China, under the authority of Vietnam, without consulting with China and over their objections:
Here’s a Reuter’s report on this development:
Exclusive: As Rosneft’s Vietnam unit drills in disputed area of South China Sea, Beijing issues warning
Link:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-rosneft-vietnam-southchinasea-exclusv/exclusive-as-rosnefts-vietnam-unit-drills-in-disputed-area-of-south-china-sea-beijing-issues-warning-idUSKCN1II09H
Rosneft not backing down, the next day, after Chinese warning:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-rosneft-vietnam-southchinasea/rosneft-says-south-china-sea-drilling-is-within-vietnam-waters-idUSKCN1II10B
China reiterating their warning after rosneft statement (and Russia continuing to ignore it):
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-rosneft-vietnam-southchinasea/rosneft-says-south-china-sea-drilling-is-within-vietnam-waters-idUSKCN1II10B
And there you go bringing in a separate issue to divert attention from your original untenable argument re: the purported need for “consultation” on the use of international shipping routes. I will not dignify this with any further responses. Goodbye.
You’re projecting you’re own behavior onto me, by wasting time niggling on semantics re ADIZ while trying to distract from the main point that neither country supports China’s claims on the South China Sea.
Gosh-I wonder who stands to gain from agit-prop insinuating that Russia and China are not firm geostrategic partners? I wonder….
Well said, Rich, but look out. Anaam is nothing if not tenacious, God bless ‘im.
ADIZs are fairly common worldwide, with 20 or so active, including that of India. Will Russia not recognise India’s ADIZ? In fact the Chinese ADIZ is not targeting Russia or India in the course of normal commercial traffic, just the belligerati like the USA, the puppet Abe fascist regime and other antagonists. So you got your dhoti in a knot over nothing but bombastic jingoism.
Oh boy the poor sino-sycophants getting triggered, engaging in personal attacks on me, not realizing that they are the pot calling the kettle black: yes Russia does recognize India’s ADIZ, because it’s not in disputed areas. Look at your 3 separate consecutive responses to my post, it’s not me who’s has anything in knot, it’s clearly you.
You need to be less melodramatic in accusing me of being part of some organized “agit prop” when all I’m doing (as an individual) is offering an alternative view based on facts and logic, not the blind idealistic adulation of that sino-sycophants have for a very flawed China just because it appears to be opposed to the United States. China is pragmatic, not principled, they allied with Kissinger and Nixon (two of the most evil entities the West ever produced post WW-2) over their fellow socialists of the Soviet Union, when the CCP determined it was in their geopolitical interest to do so.
China is setting up a surveillance state that is the envy of Western globalists, yet somehow we’re supposed to believe they’re better than the West? They’ve shown clear hegemonistic tendencies, demanding other countries comply with their world view “or else”. No criticism for that huh? No? Of course not, instead, we hear crickets chirping when that’s brought up.
“…self declared ADIZ, Air Defense Identification Zone.”
LOL. Notice another ignorant China basher. FYI: all ADIZ’s are self-declared.
Yes, continue to dream about how Russia is going to help India to fight China. It is very comforting, I am sure.
You make a personal attack on me calling me a China basher, a violation of the comment rules, just because I don’t blindly agree with everything that that state does (there’s plenty I do agree with what China does). I don’t have a problem with China playing hardball politics, what I have a problem with is China being protected from legitimate criticism by the sino-sycophant crowd. And I really don’t like it when Chinese policy spokesmen engage in double talk and hypocrisy, just like their shameless Anglo-Empire counterparts.
The reason I still respect Russia and have some modicum of trust in their stated position is that they don’t engage in double talk, they bluntly state their positions, honestly, even if the view is unpopular. They make no apologies about conducting foreign policy based primarily on national self interest and respect for international law. They don’t engage in the hypocrisy of emotive hysteria centered around a fake respect for human rights (the west), or a fake statement of believing in mutual benefit when engaging in a usury debt colonization relationship with small developing countries (China).
Finally, you attribute meaning my words that were never there (in violation of the comment rule “what you really meant was…”).
When did I ever mention anything about Russia helping India in a war against China? Where the heck did that come from? This is something I haven’t even imagined (because it’s too absurd to ever happen or be considered as a realistic scenario), let alone to be stated by me.
Uncle Bob
Would absolutely love it but sadly it won’t happen.
Pearl was possible only because the CVs were safe. Now the CVNs are the floating Pearl?
Due to the “closing window”, escalation is imperative, but is the frag strategy, of empire break up, delaying war?
What undersea emplacements have been built? How can they be neatralized, as decoys are cheap and likely plentiful?
The answer to the dash 9 is of course a blockade, Singapore being sacrificed again…
Should 5 eyes just let China’s Empire implode? How likely are the Han to attack 5 eyes? Is the real threat capable of being rational and rendering the Plutonium to Caesar?
Gobbledegook, I’m afraid. Wouldn’t it be best if the Exceptionals just left other people in peace, for a change?
It is possible that war “against” the Han due to sea claims and an incident, are aimed at Japan.
The Han Empire, named after the hairy Chin people, is likely to topple easily, which is why Trump is causing internal pressures. The push to war will unify the Empire of the Dragon. Insulting Japan with an act of war, the incident, should be easy?
As ever, the reality is Singapore, Singapore, Singapore!
All trade routes lead to Singers.
Blockade of oil and food makes victory inevitable, but the cost to Austraalia and especially USA and London will be immense…. tsunami….
NS
“It is not likely that the aircraft carrier would be alone since it usually has some escorts on the surface and below the surface. Aircraft carriers are usually accompanied by other warships as a carrier group, CBG in naval parlance.”
Yeah, that is strange the carrier was without the usual surface escorts. I wondered about that when I saw the Sputnik article earlier.
Not being a military person, I look at the pbictures and they mean nothing to me. I would assume that the picture would have some “ship ID”. Therefore I say, the ships in the picture could belong to any country, besides as it was said before aircraft carrier would travel with number of support ships, where are they?