Important note:
Since archive.org is not meant to be a streaming video site, more of a download repository you might get a choppy video due to the large number of connections. If that happens, please go to this page:
https://archive.org/details/SoralRepond11jan15Part2engSubs
and consider downloading this ogg video version: https://ia601505.us.archive.org/5/items/SoralRepond11jan15Part2engSubs/Soral_repond_11jan15_part2%5Beng_subs%5D.ogv
Finally, here is the link to the first part of the interview:
http://10.16.86.131/alain-soral-answers-part-1/
I hope that this helps.
Cheers,
The Saker
Another NATO member trying to assert independence from Washington?
http://www.bfm.ru/news/289996 , 5 April 2015:
The Czech President has closed the door of his residence to the USA ambassador
The head of the republic outraged by ambassador’s criticism of the upcoming president’s visit to Moscow
Czech president Milos Zeman deems inappropriate public criticism of his upcoming participation in the celebrations of the 70th anniversary of the Victory in Moscow by the U.S. Ambassador to the Czech Republic Andrew Shapiro, reports TASS.
“For ambassador Shapiro the doors of Prague castle are closed” [Prague castle is the residence of the head of state], he stated to the electronic edition of the Czech parliament parlamentnilisty.cz [ http://www.parlamentnilisty.cz/arena/rozhovory/Prezident-Zeman-Americky-velvyslanec-ma-dvere-na-Hrad-zavrene-Nenecham-si-mluvit-do-svych-zahranicnich-cest-369407 ].
“ I cannot imagine the Czech ambassador in Washington advising American president where to go ”, said Zeman. “I will not allow any ambassador to intrude into the schedule of my visits abroad”.
Shapiro recently told Czech television that the presence Zeman at the Moscow celebrations will discredit the West’s position on Ukraine. According to him, the decision to participate in them by the leader of one of the member states of the European Union is short-sighted.
The Czech president also spoke out against the ongoing attempts to isolate Russia. “It is mandatory to maintain and develop relationship with Russia, based not only on trade, but also, for example, on strategic partnership in the fight against international terrorism”, he said.
***
[P.S. The American ambassador to the Czech republic (Shapiro) also happens to share the national persuasion with Nuland, Yatsenyuk, Kolomoiskii, Poroshenko, Kerry [Kohn], Lieberman, Brzezinski…]
You can bet they are going to go after him,if possible.I’d like to see,especially,the Slovak,Hungarian,Serbian,Greek,and Czech leaders come to the May 9th Victory Anniversary.That would show a unity of the friends of Russia in Eastern Europe.I think this year’s ceremonies are a litmus test for the World’s nations and leaderships.And hope that Russians see it that way too.Those nations leaders that attend the ceremony are friends, and those that don’t, are enemies of Russia.The view is utterly clear in this case.And the Russian people should factor that in when considering how to respond to nations around the World.
This is one of the last years many of the veterans of the Great Patriotic War will be alive to see the people’s gratitude for their unbearable sacrifices.That the West has started this revision campaign to dishonor those sacrifices is beneath contempt.And I personally and hope Russians feel the same,will not tolerate it for one moment.Much of history and politics are middle-ground “shades of gray”.This isn’t one of those.There is no middle-ground here.No shades of gray,its fully black and white.You either honor the sacrifice of the 27 million Soviet citizens that died freeing the World from fascism.Or you side with the fascist killers.We will see May 9th which countries take which side.
Erratum – the correct translation of “считает недопустимыми” is not “deems inappropriate”, but deems impermissible.
Pushkov: the conflict between the Czech President and the U.S. ambassador in Prague says about the failure of Washington’s plans
In parliamentarian’s opinion, the United States are nervous about the travel of leaders of the countries of the West to Moscow, because of fear that they will not be able to isolate Russia in celebration of the anniversary of the Victory
MOSCOW, 6 April, TASS. Chairman of the state Duma committee on international relations Aleksei Pushkov sees in the conflict between the Czech president Milos Zeman and the U.S. Ambassador in Prague Andrew Shapiro the failure of Washington’s plans to isolate Moscow in celebration of Victory.
“Judging by the hysteria of the U.S. ambassador to the Czech Republic, in Washington they are upset by the Western countries leaders’ travel to Moscow on 9 May. They fear that isolation will fail”, the Russian parliamentarian wrote in his Twitter.
Earlier it was reported that the Czech president Milos Zeman called unacceptable the public criticisms about his upcoming participation in the celebrations of the 70th anniversary of the Victory in Moscow by the U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of Andrew Shapiro.
“I cannot imagine the Czech Ambassador in Washington advising American president where to go. I will not allow any ambassador to intrude into the schedule of my visits abroad”, he said in Monday’s parliamentary electronic edition parlamentnilisty.cz.
Shapiro recently told Czech television that the presence Zeman at the Moscow celebrations will discredit the West’s position on Ukraine. According to him, the decision to participate in them by the leader of one of the member states of the European Union is short-sighted.
***
(The original article on Pushkov: http://tass.ru/politika/1881473 )
OT but very important if followed through on.There is an article on RT by Dr Alexander Yakovenko, Russian Ambassador to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Deputy foreign minister (2005-2011): http://rt.com/op-edge/247077-yemen-conflict-double-standards-crisis/
In the article,he comes to this part,” . It is worth mentioning that in September, 2014, during the UN General Assembly session Russia proposed adopting a detailed declaration that would uphold one of the principles of the UN Charter, namely, the obligation of states to prevent interference in the domestic affairs of each other and to highlight the inadmissibility of changing legitimate governments by way of violent coups. Maybe, time has come to do the right thing?” I don’t know if he is just throwing the idea out there.Or if he is broaching a new policy that Russia is considering following.I think it should be the latter and hope it will be.Russia and China along with their allies should formulate a “doctrine” that foreign interference and color revolutions that change governments will automatically be considered illegal and a violation by them of the UN Charter.And that they will recognize and aid the overthrown government to militarily regain power.No if,and’s,and but’s,to be considered.That a legal government overthrown can expect military aid,including troops,at the danger of their being overthrown.That would put a stop to color revolutions around the world instigated by the West.They are able to use that tool to destabilize a country because they can get away with it at present.If they knew that they would be stopped and the color revolution would fail they would think twice before doing that.
Off topic:
A few questions for mr Saker or other knowledgable friends:
In the Netherlands, a radio show called ´Argos´ has leaked some information that the Dutch government must have been fully aware that airspace above Dobbass was very unsafe in july 2014. No surprise here, because many other countries ceased flying over it.
In that month, the last remnants of the Ukrainian air force were shot out of the sky, including Antonov transport planes at a reported height of 5-6 km.
This fired up the discussion (of course in the Netherlands, this subject is more important than in most other countries).
1) What type of rocket or available munition to the Militia, at the time, could have been used to take these planes out?
MSM now states the area around Torez was fully in the hands of the ´pro- Russian rebels´.
However, the reports from the resistance at the time report fighting. Since the resistance at the time consisted of rather independent militia an the other side of the army + several nazi batallions, my impression has always been of a patchwork, with positions changing hands every day (if not every hour).
This would be confirmed by the detailed maps of:
http://cassad.net/?do=warmarker
…(change the date to 17-7-2014).
2) Was it indeed a patchwork?
3 ) If my memory serves me right, I am VERY sure the militia captured a BUK vehicle, just before, from the Ukrainians. And recall some indications about several Ukrainian BUK batteries cruising the area just before. From memory, reading reports at the time.
However, the internet nowadays is very contaminated, and I just cannot find it back. Google becomes almost useless about these subjects.
For our community: does anyone still have links to these articles? I am sure they existed. They are very important for truth finding and even more for the records.
In the discussions, one interesting discrepancy came up:
Of course, ´the Russians´ were guilty! Russian military crews were supposed to be the only ones able to operate the BUK system. But then, a single launch vehicle, without radar, etc. ,BUK support seems to be very imprecise qua targeting. Knowing just a little about Russian military crews, this seems a very unlikely strategy!
(in this comment, I assume MH 17 was downed by a BUK. Although I´m not convinced, I think every scenario needs to be worked out to the max. Otherwise, from what autority can one speak?)!
Interesting, but the one thing he got wrong is that Charlie Hebdo would start an endless mess. It’s already more or less forgotten. People tend to overemphasize conflict. Yes, youth “have testosterone” but of course they’s rather channel it to beer, football and girls than fighting.
France learned its lesson for now with Charlie Hebdo. German just got tapped on the shoulder with Germanwings – which also harms market leader Lufthansa. With France having to pay to clean up the mess.
It did start a mess. They’ve passed appalling surveillance and censorship laws in the wake of the Charlie killings. Administrative authorities can now ban access to websites without any review by the courts, and they’ve started to use their new powers. I wouldn’t be surprised if Soral’s own E&R website was next in line.
He is very smart, Alan Soral.
It was appalling to watch Henry Bernard Levy comparing Voltaire and Charlie Hebdo. These are dangerous people, always ready to falsify anything.
The machinery shown in the video which attacks Soral is very, very scary.
voltaire worked for capital, the comparison is ok, they are both shit
Voltaire was a great man, very important philosopher, who worked in terrible times of Christian terror. You seem to forget that, if you read Voltaire at all. He is serene yet a pessimist, a true vise man of his time. He influenced many other great figures and philosophers after him. He knew about the Jews.
The Charlie Ebdo are on the contrary not worth mentioning in this context.
The crime of Henry Bernard Levy is absolute. People who can say such words are capable of anything. And they are.
This is what Voltaire, among other things, wrote about the Jews:
“If these Ismaélites (Arabs) resembled to the Jews by the enthusiasm and the thirst for plundering, they were prodigiously higher by courage, by the nobility of soul, by the magnanimity: their history, or true or fabulous, before Mahomet, is filled of examples of friendship, such as Greece invented some in the fables of Pilade and Oreste, of Thésée and Pirithous. The history of Barmécides is only one continuation of amazing generosities which raise the heart. These features characterize a nation. We do not see on the contrary, in all annals of the Hebrew people, no generous action. They do not know nor hospitality, nor liberality, nor leniency. Their sovereign happiness is to exert wear with the foreigners; and this spirit of wear, principle of any cowardice, is so natural in their hearts, that it is the continual object of the figures that they employ in the species of eloquence which is proper for them. Their glory is to put at fire and blood the small villages they can seize. They cut the throat of the old men and the children; they hold only the girls nubiles; they assassinate their Masters when they are slaves; they can never forgive when they are victorious: they are enemy of the human mankind. No courtesy, no science, no art improved in any time, in this atrocious nation.
Voltaire, Essai sur les mœurs (1756) Tome 2, page 83.
He also wrote this:
” Jews are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race.”
Voltaire, Lettres de Memmius a Ciceron (1771)
Now, wait a second ?! Henry-Bernard Levy is extremely sensitive about anti-semitism. He is also uber-Zionist. But, anyway he sais that attack on Charlie Hebdo was “an atack on Voltaire, spirit and soul of France” ??!!!!
Don’t you have the eyes to see what is happening here, what kind of people we are dealing with ?!
No, he has participated in the destruction of Catholic France at the command of capital (and funding) and has been made a hero over it post-mortem, i went through the French education system, i know your words by heart, they are lies. And the same is true for Napoleon to who we owe the (private) banque de France by the way.
Which words are lies? Voltaire wrote this words I cited!!! They are not lies.
And, btw, what is wrong with destruction of Catholicism and Catholic France ??? That same Catholic church burned alive Giordano Bruno and Lucilio Vanini (after having their tongues cut out) in 1600. and 1619. Voltaire was born in 1694. He was a truly great man of his time.
No civilized person will ever forgive Catholic church the murder of Bruno and Vanini.
Anyway, the point remains the same: BHL doesn’t have the right to say that “Charlie Hebdo embodies the spirit of Voltaire”. Imagine if Alain Soral wrote the same stuff about the Jews which Voltaire wrote. He would have already been dead.
Jewish supremacists (Zionists) are people of no elementary decency. What they are doing with France is unbelievable. The France will eventually rise up against them and crush them in the best spirit of French Revolution, just as supporters of Dieudonne were singing the Marseillaise when faced with the Zionist gangsters of LDJ : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDnAzoO1AJo
Greetings to you, sir.
The French have gotten down and dirty for centuries all across the globe. Hebdo was a Mossad action in retaliation for recognition of Palestine in the UN. That is what I think anyway even if it wasn’t the behavior, the provocations, indeed the joy Netanyahu publically demonstrated after the attacks surely rubbed the French noses in it. I think the military support for Lebanon which also has a clause to be used against Hezbollah is payback- not that it will be used against Hezbollah but will help to arm them. This is what I think anyway I could be wrong but don’t think so. The little clause about fighting Hezbollah is an inside signal telling Israel two can play that game. Time will tell.
If you can understand French, go watch the videos by Marion Sigaut on Soral’s E&R website, and I guarantee you’ll completely change your mind about Voltaire (and the whole Lumières movement by the way). Behind the legend is a pathological liar, an enemy of the people and an all-around despicable human being.
No, my French is too rusty. But I will watch the third part of Soral’s interview, where he will mention the book of Marion Sigaut on Voltaire.
I doubt anybody can change my opinion on Voltaire.
Soral is a political activist, and a very good one, but this is a too serious matter.
It is a bit ironic that main Jewish supremacist BHL cites Voltaire as a symbol of France, while on Soral’s site you can find anti-Voltaire videos, having in mind what Voltaire said about the Jews, and having in mind that Voltaire brought down the repressive and always the most repulsive Judeo-Christian (Catholic) regime in France.
Soral’s review of Sigaut’s book on Voltaire is not in part 3 but in a different video that was shot at the same time but released a couple of weeks later called “conseils de lecture” (= reading recommendations / the part on Voltaire starts at 14’28”).
As for the image that you have of the French monarchy, ask yourself whether it is authentic or a product of ideology and propaganda. Think about how people in the West today also see Russia as “repressive” and “repulsive”…
“Vanini then left Paris, where he had been staying as chaplain to the Marechal de Bassompierre, and began to teach in Toulouse. In November 1618, he was arrested and, after a prolonged trial, was condemned to have his tongue cut out, to be strangled at the stake, and to have his body burned to ashes. The sentence was executed on 9 February 1619.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucilio_Vanini
So it is not a product of any ideology and propaganda. Murdering philosophers is the greatest crime imaginable. And the Catholic France did just that. There is no excuse, there is only an eternal shame on such regimes.
Orthodox Christians have also horrible record, killing Hypatia in a bestial manner in 415. which Voltaire rightfully used as an example against Christianity, destroying Serapeum and probably burning the Alexandrian library.
So, I am right.
And you should ask yourself another question: why were the supporters of Dieudonne singing the Marseillaise when faced with the Zionist gangsters in Paris last year ??? Why Marseillaise ?
Christianity is the oldest layer of Jewish supremacism posed upon us, and we should fight against it just as against any other form of Zionism.
You can always cherry pick some historical factoid with incomplete background to support this or that thesis. It’s too bad you can’t speak French and read Sigaut’s book to get a better historical perspective. As for why Dieudonné’s supporters sing the Marseillaise in front of Zionist thugs it’s obvious: it’s the French national anthem. Nothing more to it.
But there wouldn’t be the Marseillaise if there wasn’t Voltaire.
while in Berlin, at the Holocaust memorial, Alain Soral dared to make the famous anti-zionist gesture “Quenelle”, a French Tribunal convicted him of paying EUR 250,000 (yes, a quarter million) for this behavior. On the other hand to Jewish activists, can openly incite violence against Soral and Dieudonné without being persecuted by French justice.
The entire Charly Hebdo affair has been and will more so be used to censure the internet and further the police state.
It is only “anti-Zionist” because they declared it so. It had no such meaning until very recently, when they claimed it is a side-ways Nazi salute. So they took an innocent gesture and decided to be offended by it. To the tune of half a million.
This is in the same France that doesn’t notice REAL Nazi salutes and flags all over Ukraine.
Yes, Zionism, even without all the hidden implications, is nationalism for the Jews. As nationalism of most countries is looked down upon, according to the Western eyes, I really cannot understand how they managed to justify the criminalization of anti-Zionism…
sigh.,
Thank you very much for posting the interview. I am not French and I do not follow French politics, but I know a little about the country and the culture. Soral sounds reasonable. He looks at things from several angles, which is typically French. He also provides new information.
He has been threatened several times. France, which prides itself with free expression is not what it was in the past. I hate Frances part in the NATO attack on Yugoslavia, but I must say Chirac was the last somewhat independent president of France, though he was certainly not the great Charles de Gaulle. France has become a colony. The Empire rules in the heart of Europe.
Voltaire had shares in Compagnie des Indes, which used slavery on a massive sale. He’s the perfect symbol of french socialist’s hypocrisy and elitism.