by Aleksandar Sarovic for The Saker Blog
Authorities have power over people, and they enjoy this power. They preserve their power in society primarily by imposing knowledge on people. Authorities have been teaching us everything we know. Nothing can come to us if it does not pass the filters of authorities. We are what the authorities made us become, and it is challenging to escape from it.
If you love baseball, democracy, or god, this is because the authorities made you love it. People hardly get a chance to love something if the authorities did not let them, even though people believe that they have free will. The point is, people may only choose the options that authorities give them. Inconvenient options for authorities are not even accessible to people. For example, society has never developed a knowledge of how to create a just society because the authorities have prevented searching for the solution. When people build something new on the top of the choices the authorities give them, this is only the development of the will of authorities.
Authorities create rules which implement social policy, and people have to obey them. These rules have become the origin of social sciences. Authorities have always supported social ideas that followed their interests and suppressed those that didn’t. Therefore, social scientists have followed the interest of authorities and not of people. As a result, social sciences alienate society from social justice. We may accept that social scientists acted the best they could under the pressure of authorities, but also, their work prevents the progress of society.
Even when social scientists want to improve society, they can hardly do it because the alienated knowledge they accepted from their predecessors put them on the wrong path. Through the history of humankind, authorities have supported the creation of complex social sciences that prevent us from finding the escape from social problems. We think the way the authorities taught us to think, and that prevents us from searching for the bright future of humankind.
Social scientists have developed democracy and presented it as the best political choice of the people, by the people, for the people. According to this introduction, democracy must have been in the interest of authorities; otherwise, it would not be allowed to exist. Authorities have learned that dictatorship initiates a rebellion of people, which may take their lives. They found it more convenient to control the social policy secretly by manipulating people. Today they do it by controlling politicians, scientists, and media with the economic power they possess. I have presented how efficient they are in the article The Conspiracy of the World Exposed. As a result, we have a democracy that follows the interests of the elite and not of people. It is nothing else but a form of dictatorship that keeps preventing the freedom of people. Democracy must have been a designed forgery of the authorities.
We name the authorities in capitalism, the elite. We call them the elite because they do not rule over society openly as authorities historically did, but by secretly using the wealth they possess. Their power is nothing lesser than the power of dictators who openly ruled, but it is much more secure and stable. People cannot replace the elite from power because they do not know who they are. The politicians who work for the elite listen to their messages very carefully because otherwise, they would lose financial support from the elite and would not be able to be politicians.
Scientists know as well if they do not obey the elite, they will not get grants for their researches, and they would not be able to be scientists. This is the reason social scientists present capitalism as a final stage in the development of society. At least by not offering real solutions that might improve capitalism if not replacing it. The whole philosophy of capitalism is to let capitalists make profits. All of the paths that achieve this goal today lead to the exploitation of workers. The capitalism we know is very unjust.
Social scientists prevent ideas which may endanger the status of the elite and support ideas that help the elite survive. The elite has encouraged social sciences to support Marxism because the elite knew in advance that Marxism would put the workers on a wrong path that could not replace capitalism. History has proved it. It also shows that the elite can cheat on the highest intellectuals. If Marxism were able to replace capitalism, the elite would ban it, and not one Marxist would be able to propagate Marxism freely. I have explained it in the article Marx still prevents the progress of society.
All organizations in the western world that fight for a better future need money for their operations, and they can get it only from the elite because nobody else has it. By depending on the elite, these organizations lose their strength in fighting for social justice and a better world. Instead, by being corrupted by the elite, they rather mislead the people and prevent the bright future of humankind.
All the information available to people is created and supported by the elite. The elite owns the mainstream media of the western world, but they hide it. So-called independent media desperately need money for their operations, and they may get it only from the elite because nobody else has a financial power to support them. They pay this support by being obedient to the elite. They do not publish material the elite do not like. On the other hand, when the elite are interested in promoting something, you may find information about it where ever you turn your head. When you see a persistent media reporting, you may be well aware it is created to deceive you.
For example, people are perplexed about what exactly happened on the 9/11 terrorist attack thanks to the elite who invested billions of dollars in the 9/11 false propaganda. They did it to hide their involvement in 9/11, but also to deceive and mislead people. The elite used 9/11 to conquer independent countries around the world and to reduce the freedom of people. The elite are masters of deception. Their manipulation also divides people because then, they cannot change anything. I explained what happened on 9/11 in the article My investigation of 9/11.
Global warming propaganda is about increasing restrictions in CO2 production, which has the intention to keep the power of the elite by preventing the progress of the world, especially in developing countries. Yes, the Sahara desert expands, and the Arctic shrinks as the result of global warming, but it does not affect the rich countries. The elite has created the global warming issue, not because they are concerned about climate change, but because they want to enforce rules to control the world. In a similar example, the development of nuclear weapons is forbidden in countries that do not have it. It should obliged developed countries to get rid of their nuclear weapons as well, though they do not have any intention to do it.
The elite has initiated all of the events and talks in the western world. Nothing beside it on a public level exists. That means people think the way the elite made them think. That means whatever people do, they can do nothing but support the elite. This is the reason nothing changes. Today’s society is an authoritarian dictatorship that prevents people from freedom of creating and meeting their needs.
***
All social problems have their origin in authoritarian systems, and an escape from all of the social issues lies in equal human rights. Equal human rights will create good societies unconditionally by giving everyone the same opportunities. This is what authorities have prevented from all of the history of humankind, and as a result, we do not know even what equal human rights are.
There is no such thing as partially equal human rights because these human rights are not equal. There is only one package of equal human rights, and it should not be rocket science to discover how equal human rights are supposed to look. Everyone can come up with the idea alone if they eliminate all rights that are not equal and try to imagine the equal human rights replacement. The problem is quite simple, and yet, society has not defined equal human rights so far.
To be able to define equal human rights, we need to rethink all of the imposed knowledge authorities have produced through the history of humankind. Social scientists not only do not want to do it, but they also refuse new ideas that reconsider the alienated knowledge they have accepted. Social sciences should develop society, but in fact, they prevent the development of society and the bright future of humankind.
People tend not to accept new ideas that question the established way of thinking. Once we start loving baseball, democracy, or god, we keep loving it no matter what. As a result, people live in a deception created by authorities from the day they are born till the day they die. It alienates them from a good life, and it is tough to change.
George Orwell: “The further a society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.”
Mark Twain: “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”
The fight for equal human rights will not be easy, but it is well worth it. Once we start establishing equal human rights, a bright future of humankind will begin. And defining equal human rights is very simple. I did it in the article Equal Human Rights will Build a Good Society Unconditionally.
Aleksandar Sarovic is a husband, father, philosopher, genius, secular messiah, architect, and programmer. His work at sarovic.com and sarovic.org presents a bright future for humankind
Just the facts, please. I enjoyed baseball not because of authorities but because of its inherent characteristics.
Dave, if you were born in Europe or South America you would enjoy soccer because of its inherent characteristics imposed by authorities.
EXACTLY. :)
It could also be said that “It’s easier to fool authority than to convince authority that they have been fooled.”
Yes, you could say that.
In fact, you could say any thing…..but would it make any sense?
THAT is the question:
Would there be any productive, clarifying purpose in saying it, or would it just further muddy the waters and create more confusion?
Throughout human history there has been damned little “fooling of the authorities” by anyone in the social order below them….in fact, so little that your sentence reads as pure…. if somewhat playful………nonsense..
For the most part the only thing that “fools the authorities” is their own egoic arrogance that allows them to deceive themselves that they are practically gods.
And yet, without reading a lot more of this author’s provocative work and knowing it more thoroughly, I would observe that it is not necessarily the case that a person plucked from the lower social rungs and promoted to what we might consider “the elite” (but the author probably begs to differ that that office is elite….lol)..ie the Presidency of the United States, for example will do any better for the cause of human progress and social justice…than say, some of the kings and queens and other “bloodline” rulers of the past.
Take Barrack Obama, for example.
And is not what is true of him…….also true of probably 98% of the rest of us???
The particularism of the EGO is the ever present enemy, from the top of society…down to the very bottom…the Enemy of the Universalism……of ideas such as Social Justice…….. an idea practically destroyed by the inanity of that ideal’s current “Warriors” ….in the West.
When the Ego has run 100% amuck in the heads of the elites, they become Luciferian and they embrace “Do what thou wilt is the whole of the Law.” and decide that it is time to cull 90% of the “human herd”….THEN not only “social justice” ….but our very lives are in dire straits.
The moral fitness to survive that “elite of a garbage can” challenge to impose ruthless injustice upon humanity ……can only be found among rare persons able to…….not kill that internal enemy in all of us….(because it does have its simple, necessary functions) but largely subdue it.
Let’s not kid ourselves that anything close to a majority of victims of the social injustice of terrible (or better…there HAVE been some!) Elites…..have that Personal Ego Enemy within…under any sort of mastery any of us can safely trust…..before that trust ……..is demonstrably earned in a long enough sample of time.
Because there are still many oligarchs in Russia some communists here have insisted that Vladimir Putin is not such a person, and is very unjust.
I would ask, “Compared to whom, ,YOU???…..Don’t make me laugh.” .
Wholeheartedly agree with this article! The so called elites don’t send their kids to the same schools we’re forced to attend. In fact, more often than not, they skip schooling all together.
We, on the other hand, have to prove our worthiness for the available slave jobs with diplomas that certify our mental decapitation, as to not cause any potential disturbances in the current world, slave order. The majority of world population is trained to react with a subservient mental submission to any expression of ideas transmitted via academically induced languages, even when they are void of any sense. The cult of pre-approved experts is pervasive and powerful in all societies. Arthur Schopenhauer had some useful thoughts in this regards.
Thank you for this article.
You are welcome KINZAZA. The system of education proves only one thing, and that is obedience to authorities. That is what the elite like to most when hiring people.
Aleksandar Sarovic offers some food for thought but doesn’t really rise above the shallowness of Western ”anti-authoritarians”. A more fruitful approach opens up by acknowledging the fact that authorities are not a bad thing per se, but what needs to be asked instead is what confers authority to something/somebody in the minds of people and why. This serves to dispense with all kinds of superfluous nonsense and to focus on the merit of a certain kind of authority. Grovelling before rich people due to their private luxury or, even worse, because of one’s personal corruption is a retrograde outlook. By contrast, here at The Saker most contributors and commenters have a strong admiration for Russia’s government headed by Putin because it has a proven track record of improving the lives and hopes of the people — in Russia and abroad — without oppressing other peoples. So to most of us here, Russia/Moscow/The Kremlin/Putin would qualify as a role model of authority. No need for any Earth-is-flat rubbish where things are hopeless everywhere.
@Nussiminen
I agree. “A shallow Flat Earther” just about sums up this self-confessed oracular genius. Here is a sample from Sarovic’s 911 Investigation: “The twin towers. We all saw two planes hit the twin towers. The planes’ impacts critically damaged them. If the planes were twice as large, they would probably have cut the towers in two.” No reasoned argument, merely flat assertion.
“As who should say, I am Sir Oracle, And when I ope my lips, let no dog bark!”” — Shakespeare, Merchant of Venice.
@Dr. NG Maroudas,
Thanks for bringing my attention to Sarovic’s ”investigation” regarding 911, which I didn’t take notice of at first. A neat illustration indeed of his own assessment: ”Authorities have been teaching us everything we know. Nothing can come to us if it does not pass the filters of authorities.” Well, that’s correct if you’re too lazy and sloppy to question them.
Thanks for that comment. I won’t have to spend any time reading his other links. He really said that about planes and 9/11? Has he ever seen what happens to the aluminum skin of these airliners when they hit an object astronomically less strong than steel-reinforced concrete buildings? A flock of birds for example? And no plane parts were found anywhere. Not at the twin towers, not at the Pentagon and not in Pennsylvania.
Removed. Mod.
Equal rights?
How is that ever going to happen when in the words of Trotsky’s family one of the reasons for WW1 was to prevent the world from becoming Christian? see here:
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2019/12/25/joyeux-no%d1%91l-the-beginnings-of-wwi-and-the-christmas-truce-of-1914/#comment-321581
The people in power have a goal in mind and that is nothing else but the subjugation of the entire world to a coming king in the city of Jerusalem. A king or Messiah whom they think is going to usher in some new utopia, the golden age of mankind wherein Israel will be at the top of their precious pyramid?
Equal rights boy? lol Your either dreaming or sniffing something you shouldn’t be?
I was about to ask if this is so truthful..why is it readily available?
I was reading along in this article, and then I followed the link to his restatement of the “official narrative” 911 conspiracy theory.
Apparently Mr. Sarovic is supporting the “ignorance is strength” pillar of the Orwellian management pyramid.
Well, my point is that billions of dollars invested by the elite in deceiving people about 9/11 were extremely efficient. Unnecessary sarcasm removed – mod
Authorities who impose any kind of knowledge are the worst thing that happened in the history of humankind. In short pure evil. Opposite of it is equal human rights of people. They will create a good society unconditionally. The last lik in the article will explain it to you.
@ Sarovic
Okay, for me it is the story from Acts 2 that played the greatest case for equality though in this case it revolves around a people who were truly family in ever sense of the word:
” All the believers were together and had everything in common. They sold property and possessions to give to anyone who had need. Every day they continued to meet together in the temple courts. They broke bread in their homes and ate together with glad and sincere hearts, praising God and enjoying the favor of all the people. And the Lord added to their number daily those who were being saved.” verse 44-51
Now if this could be duplicated in our multi-cultural world then truly we would have heaven on earth. But as someone greater than me said we do not live in a world that fosters peace, love, brotherly kindness, mercy, long-suffering but rather envy, hatreds, lust, selfishness, bitter rivalry, etc etc.
Until sin gets dealt with we will never ever see this duplicated and yet I did study the remarkable history of a people who did experience this very thing from the book of Acts found in the history of the Moravians under the leadership of Count Zinzendorf. Here a small sampling:
“…and verily the 13th of August was a day of the outpouring of the Holy Spirit. We saw the hand of God and His wonders, and we were all under the cloud of our fathers baptized with their Spirit. The Holy Ghost came upon us and in those days great signs and wonders took place in our midst. From that time, scarcely a day passed but what we beheld His almighty workings among us. A great hunger after the Word of God took possession of us so that we had to have three services every day, viz., 5:00 and 7:30 A.M. and 9 P.M. Everyone desired above everything else that the Holy Spirit might have full control. Self-love and self-will as well as all disobedience disappeared and an overwhelming flood of grace swept us all out into the great ocean of Divine Love…
Exactly what happened at Wednesday forenoon, August 13th, 1727 in the specially called Communion service at Berthelsdorf, none of the participants could fully describe. They left the house of God that noon “hardly knowing whether they belonged to earth or had already gone to heaven.”…
Zinzendorf, who gives us the deepest and most vivid account of this wonderful occurrence, says it was a sense of the nearness of Christ bestowed in a single moment, upon all the members that were present; and it was so unanimous that two members, at work 20 miles away, unaware that the meeting was being held, became at the same time deeply conscious of the same blessing.
The great Moravian Pentecost was not a shower of blessing out of a cloudless sky. It did come suddenly, as suddenly as the blessing of its greater predecessor in Jerusalem, when the Christian Church was born. Yet, for long, there had been signs of an abundance of rain, though many recognized them not. In short, the blessing of the thirteenth of August 1727 was diligently and earnestly prayed for. We know of no annals of Church history which evidence greater desire for an outpouring of the Holy Spirit and more patient and persistent effort in that direction than those of our own church between the years 1725 and 1727. Two distinct lines of preparation and spiritual effort for the blessing are evident. One was prayer; the other was individual work with individuals. We are told that men and woman met for prayer and praise at one another’s homes and the Church of Berthelsdorf was crowded out. Then the entire company experienced the blessing at one and the same time.”
They started out as a multi cultural and religious bunch fleeing persecution and almost lost everything due to internal squabbles but ultimately lived the truth of those words of Christ: that they may be one as we are one Father. emphasis mine.
As for equality in the real world in which I work in the oil and gas industry I can’t see it. My word I would love to know your thoughts of a blog like ourfiniteworld where Gail Tverberg speaks about the problem of affordability and what we are facing or are going to face in the oil industry?
We will live in a world that fosters peace, love, brotherly kindness, mercy and eliminates envy, hatred, lust, selfishness, bitter rivalry, etc. by accepting equal human rights I have proposed in the link at the and of the article above. If you follow the links in this article, you would be able to understand everything. Once people accept these very simple ideas, nobody would be able to stop them.
Wow, Aleksandr you have high hopes. The human heart is a difficult if not impossible thing to change and the tongue it is the tongue that needs a bridle.
Beyond that:
Now what? Shall we wait for a new tragedy of humanity, or will we, in the name of justice and solidarity among people, be smart enough to shorten working hours as long as unemployment exists?
That tragedy may already be here if what this says is true? First by Pickens:
Financial Post dated Tuesday June 17, 2008 which reads:
“World crude oil production has topped out at 85 million barrels per day even as demand keeps climbing, helping to drive a stunning surge in prices, billionaire oil investor T. Boone Pickens said on Tuesday.
“I do believe you have peaked out at 85 million barrels a day globally,” Mr. Pickens, who heads BP Capital hedge fund with more than US$$ billion under management, said during testimony to the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.
The United States alone has been using 21 million barrels of the 85 million and producing about 7 of the 21, so if I could take just a minute on this point, the demand is about 86.4 million barrels a day, and when the demand is greater than the supply, the price has to go up until it kills demand, ” Mr Pickens told lawmakers.
U.S. crude futures have risen by a third since the start of the year and more than sixfold since 2002 as surging demand from China and other developing nations outpaces new production.
Oil slipped on Tuesday, a day after touching a record high near US $140 a barrel, but remained above US 133 a barrel.
Mr. Pickens who announced a US 2 billion investment in wind energy earlier this year, told lawmakers during a hearing on renewable electricity that he expected “the price of oil will go up further.” Without alternatives, the cost of foreign oil will drain the United States of more resources, he said.
and Gail Tverberg
“Actually, peak oil will never happen, the way peak oilers expected it to happen. Instead, we will reach financial collapse that few people will connect with energy or oil. Oil Prices will stay too low for producers to extract the oil that seems to be available. The 50 or so years of supply that seems to be available is an illusion.”
https://ourfiniteworld.com/2018/08/02/supplemental-energy-puts-humans-in-charge/comment-page-34/#comment-184532
I also thinks she is right to when she says that if the wages of non elite workers could rise high enough to pay for the output of the economy we likely wouldn’t have a problem. that however, is clearly not happening.
I see and experience this at my own job being one of those non elite workers who is finding it increasingly difficult to pay for the increasing cost of everything. furthermore the company I work for doesn’t make a profit so they themselves suffer from affordability as well? How long before the end game begins is anybody’s guess? The world needs energy though!
Am I wrong?
Unemployment creates exploitation of workers. As long as unemployment exists, the low wages will exist. We need to create an environment where workers will be more demanded. It will be accomplished by shorter work hours. If you have read the whole article from which you quoted me you would understand it
In the 14th century, the Black Death killed one-third of the Europen population, causing increased demand for workers. Suddenly the lords had to compete with each other to get their production needs done. It increased the minimum wages of workers 2-3 times in one year.
According to this historical example, if a political party wins an election offering a reduction of work to 5 hours per day, the lack of workers would increase minimum workers’ salaries 2-3 times per hour in one year. The minimum daily wages of workers would rise 30-90% for just a 5-hour shift. Workers would work shorter hours and earn much more.
It does not matter what industry you talk about. If your company cannot provide such a salary, it will bankrupt, but you would be able to find a new job the same day in profitable companies which need more workers. The wealthy owners will pay it on expenses of their profits.
I have previously put the link to this article, but the administrator did not let it go because it is pending for publishing here.
@ Aleksandar
Ah as I see it the 14 century was mostly an agrarian society so I find it hard to compare that to today. As for exploitation of workers what we are increasingly seeing today which actually got its start in Japan is contract workers. The company doesn’t hire permanent workers anymore not knowing what the future will bring really. Costs are therefore reduced substantially for the company and yet here we are just surviving and hoping that there will be future sales so we can keep on. We ask and cry for raises because one we haven’t seen any in a long time and inflation is causing pain. One of my fellow workers even complained he is making less now than what he did when he first started at the company 9 years ago.
I did read your essay but will need to think through your arguments more closely and anyway for me that essay on Yugoslavia was far more interesting to me as I am a son of that country but not born there. Born in Canada actually to Slovenian/Croatian immigrants. I can see where you get equality from. Yes, if only Yugoslavians were equals how much suffering could have been prevented.
You may be interested in a talk by a man named Dr. Sukic https://youtu.be/Dn9YsmaLk8E
This is an important talk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He has many essay to at the Occidental Observer.
The market has an essential rule: higher demand gets a greater price. It works everywhere from ever and forever. So, higher demand for workers on the market will increase their salaries. We may increase the demand for workers with shorter work hours. This is what will make capitalism a decent social system.
Sounds logical in theory but in practice I have my reservations. Our world today is far to complex and everything is interconnected. As for higher prices we sell our compressors all over the world and with the exchange rate many companies don’t bother to pay waiting for a better exchange rate. By doing so on a quarter of a million dollar machine the purchaser can save a substantial amount of money. The company suffers because we don’t get paid and so on and so forth.
Affordability is becoming a very big problem and the indebtedness of businesses especially in the oil and gas sector is terribly troubling. Many have gone bankrupt while others amalgamate cutting and ending in many cases competition.
The bigger issue is we may be returning to the stone age. Like Gail Tverberg says even if we find new sources of oil in the ground if it takes 2 or 3 hundred dollars per barrel to extract it, it will most likely just stay in the ground because no one will be able to afford the costs. As she sums up her argument we need cheap to extract oil like in the early days and that I’m afraid is long gone never to return. Actually look at Russia and her desire in the Arctic? How much is that costing her and will cost to extract and ultimately sell and or use?
>Aleksandar Sarovic is a husband, father, philosopher, genius, secular messiah, architect, and programmer
Apparently, he is humble too! I found this a rather sad opinion piece. It is so full of cynicism about everything. Do I believe large segments of society are under a veil of propaganda and social engineering? Absolutely. Are we all hopeless drones who can’t formulate our own thoughts, views, likes and dislikes and the only way it can be any different is if the elite will it to be so? Absolutely NOT! For one thing, I can assure this writer that my religious views are against the will of the elite who are trying very hard to destroy THE Church, the Orthodox Church. And I am well aware that their 9/11 story is a fabrication. Most of central and South America want a social democracy where their resources are used for the good of the people. So, all these are not under the control of the elite. The only option the rulers have is force, but this doesn’t change what the people believe. They already see through the evil in ‘free-market capitalism’.
There is a state of mind often referred to metaphorically as being plugged into the Matrix. But people are breaking out of this state every day. Once a person finds a big enough crack in the data stream from the ministry of truth, everything else they serve up starts to unravel.
This writer gives far too much power to these elite billionaires, bankers, and industrialists as if they are all-knowing, all-powerful and can never fail or be defeated. They have to use the toilet like everyone else and they can’t postpone their day of death forever either.
The only problem is that the competition for resources is still raging, and the who control this competition are the billionaires, bankers and industrialists, so yes they are already all powerful in as much as they can compete, and the individual can not. The formula they use also convinces them that they are also all knowing and as of today, unstoppable to gather up as many resources as they can get their grubby little hands on.
Its a big world, w/lots of resources, and its doubtful that any one entity can control it all.
Aleksandar Sarovic finished the book Humanism 27 years ago which presents how to create a good society unconditionally, and have difficulties to be accepted because his ideas based on equal human rights are completely opposite to what authorities have taught people from ever causing them to live in a terrible world.
Mr sarovic, after all what the hell is ‘marxism’ for you?
you apparently have missed that the opposite of capitalism is not marxism but socialism – and this socialism is a dynamic, ever self constructing thing.
And dynamically adjusting to the society it works in.
Of course any moron knows that socialism is much more needed in an agrarian society that in a kinda singaporean one. Obvious.
Look at what happened to the African countries in the 18th and 19th centuries when the European powers dilligently and methodically have applied Capitalism to African societies.
And I don t know and never heard of any elites /authorities anywhere here in our Latin america who EVER permitted or allowed any Marxism. No matter whether in academy or on the streets or on the voting ballots -They abhor any resemblance of it. And promptly send their leaders to prison. Is it any different in the places your have been acquainted to or visited?
Agree with you.
Marx defined the foundation of socialism and communism and his basic definition is the most accepted definition around the world. All his principles of how to establish socialism and communism and how they are supposed to look like were mistakes that obviously did not work and history proved it. I have defined socialism and communism which will work. You may find it in the link about Marx above.
It is difficult not to become bitter, or jaded. It is not difficult to lose hope. However, signalling the reflection of surrender to the very thing you are citing as unpleasant might be counterproductive. If you can be unemotionally truthful with yourself, while you objectively and accurately observe the truth of the reality, then you can formulate a more effective position from which to exert some seriously helpful influence on the situation. This is true even if you are ‘just some dude’.
I said that authorities prevent the bright future of humankind and presented the result of my experience but I never gave up. If you read the last link in the article you will see that if equal human rights are accepted tomorrow, the elimination of all social evil together with starting a bright future of humankind will start tomorrow.
Anyone who thinks we live in a democracy is deaf dumb and blind.
What Mussolini meant by Fascism is Corporationism, meaning big corporate control of government. This form of Government comes about because of corruption, ie massive endemic institutionalised corruption that hands control of state functions to the Oligarchy who own the Corporations.
Corporate censorship is a function of fascism. Fascism also entrenches the oligarchic one party system, the Republicans and Democrats, to paraphrase George Galloway, are just two cheeks of the one Corporate arse.
The Main street in Tel Aviv is Rothschild Boulevard. On September 12th, 2001, Benjamin Netanyahu was quoted as saying 911 was very good because it created sympathy for Israel. Anyone who’s done the slightest amount of reading knows that the Balfour Declaration, a blatant permission slip for Zionist Bankers to act as proxy imperialists for the West, which should be obvious. The Declaration was addressed to England’s banker, Lord Rothschild. So where’s the secret?
The Reichstag fire which destroyed the signature building of Germany was lit by the Nazis who used a patsy to blame. The Nazis were backed by Prescott Bush. Father of GHW Bush, deeply implicated in the murder of JFK.
The 2000 election was stolen in broad daylight, W Bush was installed as president in a Supreme Court coup, acquiesced to by the Democrats. 10 months later, America’s version of the Reichstag occurred, followed by the US version of the Nazi’s Enabling Act, the analogue being the Patriot Act. Recently reapproved by both Republicans and Democrats.
911 was a joint venture between Israel and the US. Both controlled by fascists.
Conclusion: The self adulating author has some things correct but unconvincing in details. When I was in China, a Chinese monk told me that the Rothschilds control the world economy. Of course, since anyone who does some research knows this to be so, who could disagree? So the elites are not exactly secret.
This article is just one person’s opinion, not to be taken as Gospel truth by the self proclaimed Messiah, a sure red flag.
If you actually read this article and following links to the topics that especially interest you, you would find my article “Jacob Rothschild is quilty for the conspiracy against humankind.” You may also find in the link above my article “The conspiracy of the world exposed” which presents deception of the people affecting the last four American presidents nobody is still aware of. Finally, in the last link of the article, I clearly present how to eliminate social evil and create a good society. This is something neither Jesus Christ was able to define.
Good heavens … I think we have a serious problem of words and understanding here in the main.
– Take the words ‘equal human rights’ and replace them with ‘personal sovereignty’.
– Take the word ‘humanism’ which is quite old fashioned nowadays and replace it with Renaissance Humanism which I think is what we are dealing with here. “…. a renewed confidence in the ability of human beings to determine for themselves truth and falsehood.”
https://americanhumanist.org/what-is-humanism/edwords-what-is-humanism/
– Take the words ‘secular messiah’ and replace those with ‘working with the human condition not from a spiritual or religious perspective’, or ‘spreading the good news from a secular perspective.’
– Genius? The writer may be a genius – i.e., over 130 on most of the IQ scales.
– All authority is present for the benefit of authority and not for the benefit of the human beings on this earth, and,
– All social problems have roots in authoritarian systems.
Can the ones which are so critical here truly debunk that? (Yes, there are good authorities too, but they do it differently’.)
Read through the words to the meaning behind them. This is not a native English speaker. Yes, the examples drawn are wacky at times and the language reminds me of some older British English.
But, some history: http://www.sarovic.com/debt_to_yugoslavia.htm
I am of the opinion that few here understand what this writer is saying, the context that it is said in, and the picture of a complete absence of authority, secular or religious authority. But, he did ruffle a few feathers sure – mainly I think by the interp of 9/11 and other examples chosen. But, no need to insult the author.
Thank you for your support amarynth.
Good authorities exist es well, but they never impose anything on anyone. They give their opinion when they are asked to do it. All others are pure evil.
I believe that the existing definition of geniuses is a deception of authorities. It has nothing to do with intelligence. Geniuses feel their way. And they can do it but not believing in authorities.
I have chosen therms the best I could. Yes, you were able to better present some by using more words, but that is not practical.
By having more than 20 years of experience in discussing all of the issues mentioned above, I feel very confident to be able to defend everything I wrote.
Thanks again.
First, thanks for writing for The Saker Blog. And ooops, I did not support you really, I just asked our readers to read with more attention. :-)
Now, I’ll give you my critique – fwiw.
Well, most here (myself included) do not fall for the NIST weasly words 9/11 interpretation. But, this was not the focus of your writing here.
I would say it is absolutely practical and truly necessary to speak in terms that most would understand. Self-defined language without definition is counter-productive. I myself said WTH? What is he talking about?. And I could not get there before I made the split of secular and religious or even just moral authority and figured out you’re talking from a hard secular perspective and using words that have different meaning than in general conversation.
Same as I’m telling the Saker readers and commentators that there is something that they are missing, so I can now tell you that it would lead to much less ‘defense’ and much more understanding if you define your terms, especially for a new audience.
What is ‘authority’ in your world? And for the average person (even the above average Saker Commentator – we have our own geniuses here), if you call yourself a genius, you gotto be able to support that :-) with understandable language, and not some self-definition that nobody knows about.
There is a lot wrong in our world. I personally would like to see more of your work, but let’s sort out the problem of terminology, which will also sort out the problem of a hostile audience vs a learning, engaged and friendly audience. This is a very tough crowd ;-).
After the 9/11 terrorist attack, the elite invested billions of dollars in the 9/11 false propaganda. They did it to mislead people for supporting the aggression on independent countries, which had nothing to do with 9/11. Then they earned trillions of dollars from selling weapons for the attack in these countries. They planned to make much more by colonizing these countries. By the false propaganda, the elite has also hidden their involvement in 9/11.
Furthermore, their manipulation has reduced the freedom of people while dividing them and making them incapable of understanding and changing anything. The elite are masters of deception. I explained what happened on 9/11 in the article “My investigation of 9/11.” You may find the link in the article above. If you want to discuss it with me, you need to read it.
Authorities are all the people who have power over others. One may take them as he or she wishes, starting with presidents of countries, and going down to bosses, teachers, and even to parents who force anybody to obey them.
Rothschild and the antichrist
I wish I could find that piece from Catherine Austin Fitts who actually laughed at herself at her inability to discover Mr. Global as she put it. I only remember parts of the discussion with an interviewer and how she replied that with all her contacts and knowledge and expertise she couldn’t find nor identify the one behind the curtain. I will also not soon forget how she summed up that entire interview with the view that we are losing our individual sovereignty in favor of “livestock management.” The powers that be truly want to enact or legislate morality by way of controlling us mind, body and spirit. The technology exists one need only look at the Social Credit System of China which I figure will be rolled out worldwide by this Mr. Global and then his declaring itself as god from Jerusalem!
Then will come the mother of all global warming.
Satan was given authority over this world a long time ago and by rejecting Christ we empower it in all its spheres of influence.
That interview by CAF was around or just before Trump’s election. I remember it well.
But the China social credit system is usually misrepresented by Western Commentators. We need to remember the China does not have any of the US and probably other western nations types of credit scoring systems. So, they need something ..
I agree that the powers are teaching us all day long, they did this also in the past by various means, mostly by pressure. The pressure remained, only the methods have changed. The problem – as I see it – are the people themselves, on the individual level, because each person has the ability to think independently, nobody can reach his/her mind if he/she doesn’t allow it. This, however, requires an open spirit with a self conditioning for searching the truth, which is not an easy ride at all. Taking down the veils one after the other, the well dressed statue of power remains naked and the sight shows something different which for many is not pleasant, therefore they will rather accept the statue as it is.
Each person thinks independently by analyzing the premises which are coming to him from the outside world. If authorities entirely control these premises, then the conclusion of each person follows the needs of authorities, because nothing else exists.
I’m sorry Sir but it seems that I’m an exception from the rule, otherwise I wouldn’t be in a difficult situation for so many years. Of course, such exceptions from the rule you may suggest, are many on this planet, otherwise we would already have the one world one government, which implies that the dream of a better or brighter future – as you say – will never come true. So why the whole effort when all people have been “educated” and made compatible with the will of the powers ? isn’t there a contradiction ?
It seems that people read a few sentences from the text just to find something to comment on. I would like to know what is so desirable in making comments that do not have sense. I explained how bad the situation is, but it is far away from desperate nothing can change. Contrary, my link Human Rights will Build a Good Society Unconditionally is very optimistic.
You lost me when i read in your site that you find the nist report correct.
If you read the article till the end you would find the truth, which is the elite invested billions of dollars in cheating on people, and they were very successful in it.
A very illuminating article, that describes something that any person that “turn off the TV set for a while, try to put a bit of calm in its brain” and THINK, can realize “almost intuitively”… Not completely, but have a clue.
Many, many thanks, Mr. Sarovic.
Excellent.
Kind regards..!
Thank you Mikhail!
Ummm … We enter this existence in a ‘primordial’ state – that being one without conditioning. With conditioning, we develop beliefs and views, and our emotions arise when those imposed boundaries are violated. Indeed, one could argue that even our physical, psychological, and spiritual (whatever that might be, even if it’s real) are adversely affected by our conditioning after birth (i.e., “becoming”) – and note this is not necessarily governments, but also tribal/sociological groupthink, religions, [errant] college ‘professors’, parents and family, etc. So, isn’t it just natural that authority figures would recognize this and ‘help the nature of our universe along – strictly for their benefit, of course. So everything we sense from birth onward, results in our (human) conditioning – and it’s only when we learn to recognize it that we can become detached from it and experience life and our existence for what it is. If we never recognize this, then of course, we’ll never escape. TDS anyone? Respectfully, GB
I have defined authorities at the beginning of the article as individuals who have power over people, and they enjoy this power. Then it comes without saying that ultimate authorities have ultimate power. And if one tries to challenge their power which controls what we think, which is actually what we are, it is forbiden that much that we do not have a clue how to do it.
(…) Social scientists have developed democracy and presented it as the best political choice of the people, by the people, for the people. According to this introduction, democracy must have been in the interest of the authorities; otherwise, it would not be allowed to exist. (…)
Aleksandar Sarovic is a con. An idiot who doesn’t even understand what he wrote!
Democracy is indeed By the People and For the People but, authority IS THE People! It is the People who propose HIS laws and vote HIS laws themselves!
There is only one country in the world in Democracy: Switzerland.
(…) the Arctic is shrinking due to global warming, (…)
Yes but … IT’S BELOW! It is from below that the ice does and not from above or on the sides! These are the magmatic hot springs at the bottom of the oceans that melt and detach the glaciers stuck on them. And, against the activities of magma WE CANNOT THERE ANYTHING!
Authorities have learned that dictatorship initiates a rebellion of people, which may take their lives. They found it more convenient to control the social policy secretly by manipulating people. Today they do it by controlling politicians, scientists, and media with the economic power they possess.
That may be true in the past however, oil is the real player today and the countries who possess it in abundance have the greater say though even this is questionable because ultimately it is the market and price which determines so much. Take for example Gail Tverberg::
Citizens of the United States, Europe, and Japan are used to thinking of high energy prices as being a problem because they are from countries that require substantial imported energy to maintain their GDP. For example, Greece will sell fewer trips on its tour boats, if oil prices are high. This will have an adverse impact on employment and the ability to repay debt with interest.
If a country is an oil exporting country, low oil prices are an even worse problem. This happens because oil exporting countries tend to earn a large share of their revenue from taxes on the sale of oil. These taxes can be much higher if oil is selling for, say, $120 per barrel than if it is selling for $60 per barrel. These tax dollars are used to provide subsidies to offset the high cost of imported food. They are also used to build industry and infrastructure to provide employment to the population.
If oil prices are too low, oil exporting countries will tend to cut back on oil production. In fact, this has been happening for OPEC for the entire year of 2019.
Similar problems occur if commodity prices of any kind (coal, natural gas, uranium, steel, copper, etc.) stay too low for an extended period. Producers go bankrupt, or they stop production, or they pay their employees so poorly that the employees go on strike. Sometimes, they may even start rioting. Many of the riots around the world today are related to low commodity prices.
https://ourfiniteworld.com/2019/12/08/recession-ahead-an-overview-of-our-predicament/
Further to this is:
Strangely enough, central banks push back against high oil prices as well. They know that high oil prices lead to high food prices. Citizens of energy-importing countries will be unhappy with elected officials if oil and food prices rise. Thus, central banks tend to raise short-term interest rates, as soon as they become concerned about high oil and food prices.
The recession that follows will quickly bring food and energy prices back down. If food and energy prices fall, the low prices will be the problem of the energy producers. Oil exporters will find their tax revenue too low, but the high-price problem of oil importers will be gone.”
I’m afraid even authorities today are largely at a loss and this of course takes the shape of just more centralized government trying to control humanity. So in the words of many:
“We shall have a world government whether or not we like it. The only question is, whether world government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”
—James Warburg, February 17, 1950 before the U.S. Senate
“It is necessary to discover a head capable of directing it, endowed with an intelligence surpassing the most elevated human level.”
—H.G. Wells
“Let that man be a military man or a layman, it matters not.”
—Paul Henry Spaak, first president of the Council of Europe, planner of the European Common Market, president of the United Nations General Assembly, and one-time Secretary-General of NATO
“Strong, one-man civilian control of America’s giant military establishment is vital to the nation’s wellbeing. The concentration of authority is inevitable.”
—Roswell Gilpatrick, Deputy Secretary of Defence
Equality may come but it will be nowhere like a Sarovic imagines! Unfortunately, more like what Dostoevsky said about him who controls ones conscience and bread.
Today the technology exists to do exactly that. We may thus be chipped accordingly which is forbidden by God? Rev. 13
Lastly, the best quote ever on authority ever written or experienced by anyone did it not come by way of what is written in Mathew 7:
28 When Jesus had finished saying these things, the crowds were amazed at his teaching, 29 because he taught as one who had authority, and not as their teachers of the law.
Knowledge is the most powerful, and that is the reason the elite prevents it. The oil is worth nothing without workers who produce it. The elite maintains unemployment to be always able to find workers. If we eliminate unemployment or even better, create negative unemployment by shorter work hours, the demand for workers will increase on the market, and they will be paid more no matter what.
@ Aleksandar
At our company we are running three shifts day, night and weekends due to time constraints and are open constantly to hiring people though its all temps and contract. However, for one reason or another many do not work out and so need replacing. Large turnover. This company does not maintain unemployment. We are at the mercy of other factors beyond their control. Heck just last week we lost a compressor in testing because of human error. Too much silicone was used which sealed an oil run. A very expensive mistake.
Now at another company just down the road which is a private firm they just suffered massive layoffs some 60 people due to their customer moving their needs offshore to Taiwan from here in Canada. I know one of the foremen personally and he says that the costs are cheaper labor and material wise next to the logistical issues.
I submit what you propose may be good theoretically but practically I’m afraid there are so many factors at play it is just mind-boggling really to think about. I have and will be when I return to work will be sharing this idea to see what kind of response I get. I figure I’ll be laughed at really.
The rich people have become wealthy, thanks to the abundance of available workers paid low. Shorter work hours will eliminate it. When there are not enough workers on the market, the employers will have to fight each other to get them by increasing their salaries. This is all. It has to be decided by the government, so all that we need is to get a political party that will win the election offering shorter work hours. Once it is accepted, you will be better paid and will never be afraid of losing a job.
Ah, Aleksandar,
Three years ago our company lost 10 million dollars and the executives at a company wide meeting were not happy hence the huge layoffs at that time and some reorganizing. they had every right to shut us down and said so. They realized the problems of affordability and kept what was left of us employed with the goal of not making a profit! They were happy to just break even. We moreover had to move out of the building we were in into a new building saving them almost 40 grand a year. Still not enough? Our subsidiary was also half sold to a European rival which is increasingly becoming the norm. Affordability is causing many to realize that amalgamation is the key now.
As for your elites making money from us poor saps watch this video about Rockefeller and the work of woman’s liberation? starts at the 9:16 mark. Given what you talk about it is puzzling why no mention him?This is one elite who was antichrist totally and completely!!!! And we have at our company 2 women on the production line? Equals?
https://youtu.be/7gwcQjDhZtI
After this consider another elite who truly set in ink the ultimate goal of government:
His name is Colonel Edward House, a Jewish American who was originally a cotton farmer from Houston, Texas who turned politician becoming an American diplomat and finally a presidential advisor to President Woodrow Wilson as well as banking. He had enormous influence over American foreign policy and was one of the main architects overseeing the drafting of the Treaty of Versailles as well as the Council on Foreign Relations and the United Nations and most significantly the Federal Reserve. In his novel called PHILIP DRU: ADMINISTRATOR: A STORY OF TOMORROW 1920-1935 {how prophetic a title} this is what the author fully says:
“[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a National system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency.
Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions.
Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability.
After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.”
Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”32
Wow, here’s a great quote
“The life of the individual is a constant struggle, and not merely a metaphorical one, against want or boredom, but also an actual struggle against other people. He discovers adversaries everywhere, lives in continual conflict and dies with sword in hand.”
Arthur Schopenhauer, On the Suffering of the World
the essay its attached to may be even more to your liking for equality.
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2019/12/29/will-2020-see-the-emergence-of-a-nationalist-left/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+theoccidentalobserver%2Ffeed+%28The+Occidental+Observer%29
I however, like this one sentence:
“Here it suffices only to remark that the insane talk sense at times, even as their psyche shatters.”
read the episode before and after as to why Joyce says this especially the marriages of Gallway?
The ones we should feel sorry for are the ones that we refer to as the elite, as in who are more trapped the they.
They are required to be indoctrinated we are not.
They have more to lose then we do.
On a side note, there are actors, players, guides,watchers in this realm which one are you?
This article makes some good points, but overstates them, and the positive vision is vague. I’m clear what the author is primarily against, and I’m against it as well.
But the rule of authorities and elites is never absolute. There are two related problems with deciding that anything apparently anti-authoritarian which exists must (by virtue of existing) actually be a plot by the authorities. First, it makes all resistance impossible–any time you appear to be doing anything useful, that must be because the authorities want you to, so you should stop and instead try something that doesn’t work. Second, it has to apply to the speaker as well–if Mr. Sarovic is right about, say, Marxism, only being allowed to exist because it is useful, then that must be true of whatever ideology Mr. Sarovic favours as well: If he was saying anything dangerous, presumably he would have been stopped by now.
But in fact it doesn’t work that way. Sure, the authorities often try to co-opt grassroots movements, and frequently succeed, but it’s not that hard to tell when they’ve succeeded. In the United States, looking at history you can fairly easily tell the difference between phases and segments of the labour movement which were and weren’t co-opted by the authorities; the CIO and the Wobblies weren’t, the AFL and, later, AFL-CIO mostly was and is. The basic problem for all elites is that they are greedy–they want everything. They may use restraint for prudent reasons, but this restraint erodes. So the stronger their control, the more people they tend to impoverish. And propaganda is great for convincing people of what’s going on far away or of vague theoretical ideologies, but it is terrible for convincing them that they themselves are doing fine when their hungry stomachs and crappy homes tell them otherwise. People get mad when their livings are eroding.
And spending on the tools of oppression is a cost as well, which greedy elites want for themselves instead; while it’s rare for authorities to officially reduce spending on such things, elite corruption hollows out such spending. An obvious example was how badly Iraq did trying to stop ISIS, because the military spending they had on paper had been siphoned away by corrupt elites to the point where most of their military personnel were ghosts, the pay going into officers’ pockets. It usually doesn’t get that extreme, but the equilibrium for elite control is somewhere around what they think is “good enough”, which is well short of complete control. Add to that the simple fact that human organization is not a solved science and people are fallible and work at cross-purposes with conflicting motivations, and no system of thought control and oppression comes anything close to perfect.
Marxism, mind you, actually has to a fair extent the same problem as Mr. Sarovic’s article. Marxism is mostly an analysis of capitalism and how it works, and a rejection of it. Marx’s own analysis was pretty good and has stood up well, and lots of smart people have elaborated and modified it. But that led to a rather vague politics which basically said if the problem is private ownership by capitalists, we should stop doing that and do, um, something else. In the earlier 20th century that something else tended to be very centralized and statist and mainly substitute different decision-makers for capitalist owners. But none of that actually flows from Marxist analysis, which is all about capitalism and its problems. One thing Marxism does point out, however, is the tendency for capitalism to have crises which, again, can loosen control, at least temporarily.
Mr. Sarovic talks about equality, which is fine and dandy and I’m in favour of it. But the Democratic party of the United States claims to be all about equality; it’s almost an empty concept. Having “equality” in terms of negative rights is not worthless, but it doesn’t get to the really core issues. The question is, who gets all the stuff and who gets to make decisions. And at this point, the useful part of Mr. Sarovic’s analysis comes out: Authority, elites who make decisions get to have all the stuff. The direct implication is that the only way to stop having authorities taking everything and making our lives worse is for people in general to make decisions–including in the economic sphere–rather than have authorities make decisions for them. Direct democracy, anarchism, whatever you want to call it, is the only way out of the problem Mr. Sarovic describes. And yes, the path to that probably involves some reliance on Marxist analysis of capitalist political economy.
Thanks for your opinion. The elite are exceptionally well organized today and deceive people completely. Marx analyzed capitalism correctly, but his vision of the workers’ escape from the exploitation was utterly false, and that is the reason the elite supported him. If he were by any chance right, the elite would not support him and people would not know he existed. That is how bad things are.
To escape from the bad history of humankind, which by the way never changed, but was only replaced by new forms through new deception of the elite, we need to rethink completely knowledge authorities and elite imposed on us.
I did it and found that the only escape lies in equal human rights. This is the only thing that may release us from the elite and help us build a bright future for humankind for the first time. If you are interested in how it is supposed to look like, you should read the last articles at my blog sarovic.org.