by Ramin Mazaheri and cross-posted with PressTV
It’s a question which appears almost too basic a starting point, but not when we recall what a catastrophe the heart of Western Europe has been since 2017:
What is to be done about France?
Emmanuel Macron: Marketed as Prince Charming but who quickly became Evil King Manu I of the neoliberal empire of the European Union.
The Yellow Vests: It’s as if France has spectacularly grown a fifth limb, no? Yet there it is – muscled and grasping. By now the followers of France should know what it is and what it wants, but what we can’t say for certain is what it can do to a presidential election because this is its very first.
Eric Zemmour: And you thought Marine Le Pen was repugnant? If the 1% can fabricate a Macron out of nothing and in mere weeks, of course they can create a Zemmour to divert attention/split the right-wing vote/divert attention again.
Marine Le Pen: Joan of Arc was not yet another ineffectual leader (hereditary, even) of a discredited system – Marine has been totally unmasked by the Yellow Vests. After all the authoritarian beat-downs, mosque closures and states of emergency since 2017 – do you still believe Macron was the better choice?
Traditional political parties: Routed. They’re down to their last party-machine fiefdoms, such as the mayorship of Paris.
France’s left: Routed. Always a paper tiger – now barely there on paper.
Unions: Routed by the Yellow Vests. Only the media cares what they have to say anymore, and perhaps also the tiny percent of France (8%) which is still unionised.
Mainstream media: Routed by the Yellow Vests. If in Western liberal democracies politicians are the new aristocracy then media are the new clerical class. The miracle of transubstantiation which they insist on, and which few outside of their class actually believe, is that the universal value of Western relativism means that impiety can be the same thing as piety.
Catholic Church: France, long-known as the “daughter of the Roman Catholic Church”, has just been embroiled (seemingly rather tardily) in a massive pedophile cover-up scandal.
Notre Dame Cathedral: Europe’s most famous house of worship is still closed and will be until 2024. Recall that the fire began just an hour before Macron was due to give an exceptionally rare speech – to finally discuss the then 5-month long Yellow Vest crisis.
France’s polling agencies are so discredited that the most popular newspaper, Ouest-France, has already refused to run any polls ahead of the election. They are perceived as being tremendously biased in large part because they are now staffed at the top by the mainstream politicians who recently lost their public posts.
The French were as appalled by their nation’s part in Afghanistan as anyone else in the Western colonial coalition.
The war in Mali – started by Francois Hollande, and before the initial consent of the United Nations – has been declared an abject failure and withdrawal has begun.
France has been in a state of emergency for most of Macron’s tenure.
The longest labor movement in French history – the general strike of late 2019/early 2020 – failed, and for too many reasons to list here.
In short, it’s a total catastrophe.
I don’t mean to be negative, nihilistic or to sow despair, but who can look back at France since 2017 and see otherwise?
Did you notice that I haven’t even mentioned the coronavirus? Now do you see how bad it is?
Where is the political renewal which Macronism promised? Running a corruption-free administration – following the gaudy Sarkozy and the treacherous Hollande administrations – was truly a top-three plank of Macron’s.
The average person doesn’t fully grasp the complex but nation-appalling Benalla affair or remember Lobstergate, but they can easily imagine the effect of this: Macron set the record for most forced resignations by disgraced cabinet ministers after just two years in office. If corona hadn’t come along to totally disrupt the normal functioning of political life, and of its observation by journalists and citizens, how much worse would this record have gotten?
“The Yellow Vests will triumph” was spray-painted on the Arc de Triomphe, stunning the entire world. It was undoubtedly the defining image of France during the Macron era – a massive communications victory which redefined the image of France in the world, and of neoliberalism, and of Macron. Maybe they will yet?
Corona obviously prevented the Yellow Vests from marching, but their “Season 2” premiered last month. No one can claim that the Yellow Vests do not represent a massive renewal – of some sort – in French politics and still remain credible. To do so is to show either total ignorance or willing complicity.
France is simultaneously synonymous with “liberty” and yet had the most corona restrictions in the West – without a corona passport you can’t do anything indoors here except basic shopping (you can’t even have coffee on a cafe’s outdoor terrace). Corona preserved in amber so many (too many) problems of French life, but soon the intensity of the presidential election will melt these things away and reveal what was encased inside.
While the national corona passport has been extended until after the elections (will it be used to bar people from voting facilities?) the April presidential and June legislative elections will essentially be the West’s first post-corona election. Yes, some unhappy souls will wear masks for the rest of their life, but I think we can predict that this winter’s inevitable surge in illnesses will be the vaccine-rich West’s last chance to ardently wave the bloody flag of corona.
The Yellow Vests are right – it’s the system of Western liberal democracy, stupid: it preserves and perpetuates inequality and anti-democracy. And yet, how should they vote?
Voting out the two mainstream parties and giving Macron’s new party control over the executive and legislative branches has undoubtedly resulted in the most brutal civil political conditions since 1968.
Is that a platform worthy of re-election?
Is it remotely credible to encourage a return of the mainstream parties?
Macron, Zemmour, Le Pen – these are all people on the far-right (either economically, politically, culturally or all three). I wrote this in 2017 but was shouted down by journalist colleagues who insisted that Macron was a “centrist”. Nobody would dare claim that now, and this long-resisted knowledge cost many Yellow Vests an eye, a hand, their rights, their freedom, etc. Should we just acquiesce to the fact that France’s political power lays in the capitalist-imperialist right, and has since about 1794?
In the 2019 elections to European Parliament the Animal Rights Party received – incredibly – more than double the score of all the Yellow Vest lists combined. (However, they have had more time to organise since then.)
I don’t know how to cover France’s election but I will have to figure it out. The initial math does not look good.
Ramin Mazaheri is the chief correspondent in Paris for PressTV and has lived in France since 2009. He has been a daily newspaper reporter in the US, and has reported from Iran, Cuba, Egypt, Tunisia, South Korea and elsewhere. He is the author of ‘Socialism’s Ignored Success: Iranian Islamic Socialism’ as well as ‘I’ll Ruin Everything You Are: Ending Western Propaganda on Red China’, which is also available in simplified and traditional Chinese.
Well I’m a native Brit, and compared to BoJo and Brexit, France with or without Macron looks a lot better off.
All European politicians are quaking in their boots that Vladbad the Bad with his tanks, hypersonic missiles and Asiatic hordes will sweep across the plains of northern Europe and occupy Paris.
Stupid is as stupid does, as my old granny used to say.
A special note from the author to all the Sakeristas:
Thanks to everyone who has commented and sent me notes welcoming me back to work!
I couldn’t thank you all one by one (I have had some internet problems, due to France’s awful customer service), but to anyone who took the time to write a note to me: please know it was read and greatly appreciated.
Very good to be back!
Really great to have you back!
Great to have you back✌
Would you consider starting a Substack, Ramin? Taibbi gets $50/year out of me, but I’d do at least $50/month for Mazaheri!
i would appreciate an answer…on unz today i read a comment that said yellow vests are actually called yellow jackets. o/c in NA yellow jackets are wasps, & this according to this poster (sorry i recall the comment rather than the name of the poster) that in translation it had to be blurred to yellow vests. thank you.
A more accurate translation would be hi viz vests. In France, it is mandatory to have hi viz vests in your car that you must wear in the event of a breakdown. As the original protests were motoring related due to tax increases on diesel, and much of rural France is poorly served by buses and cars are essential for commuting to work, the protestors gathered at roundabouts wearing hi viz vests to complain.
I believe the correct translation of Les Gilets Jaunes into English English would be The Yellow Jerkins.
https://www.shutterstock.com/search/jerkin
No, this is quite simple, really. The common meaning of gilet is “vest”. And jaune is also just yellow.
What is far harder for the non-French to understand, is what the yellow vests mean as a movement, which involves culture, economics, politics and even demographics. The Yellow Vests represent the majority of French people, those living outside the richer parts of Paris and Lyons, people who are being crushed by “their” government. The movement first started as a protest against higher taxes on diesel fuel, which targeted rural people who depend on private cars & trucks. In France, the less-fancy cars run on diesel because it’s cheaper. But even before the first nation-wide protests, the list of Yellow Vest grievances expanded to oppose other neoliberal “features”.
Another important motive is that many French farmers went bankrupt only because governmental policies smashed market prices. The sanctions against Russia was the final blow for the farmers because Russia responded by placing their own sanctions on imports from France. Russia had been an incredibly large market for French farmers, and market prices, already dangerously low for farmers, cratered when they lost a major customer. Russian counter-sanctions would have been obvious before the elite in Paris imposed the first sanction, but they didn’t give a damn in 2014, 2015, and still don’t care even now, because the sanctions are still in place. It’s too well-known to repeat here, but the European sanctions have massively helped Russia to rebuild their agriculture into a powerhouse, so that now, even if all sanctions were dropped, the French farmers could not get that market back.
The Yellow Vest movement is rare in that it does not have a centralized organization. There’s nothing for psychopathic politicians to sneak into. It’s possible the Yellow Vests could evolve into a political force, but I live outside France and haven’t seen any evidence of that yet. Perhaps Ramin can answer that question because it requires someone who is there, looking closely, such as at the regional meetings where, I believe, the media is not welcome.
Just put ‘gilet’ in google, and click on images.
Of course, Google Translate can be way off base, but when it comes to the market,
it’s another matter.
The neoliberal economic system failed in 2008 and is kept alive with virtual money, debt is growing exponentially.
Then came Covid-19 with lockdowns causing scarcity of goods, due to price adjustments and logistics.
Add to it “green mandated policies” which ignore real energy demands and push technologies which are not sufficient and not efficient enough to replace carbon based sources. (Look at the forest of French windmills not moving, due to lack of wind, at hours of high energy demand).
All three components will finish in total bankruptcy of the Western world.
France, at least, has nuclear energy, Germany has none, and might last a bit longer from the energy perspective.
French media is completely disconnected from the world French people faces daily and keeps pushing issues which are absolutely irrelevant to the average French who is struggling to pay his bills for electricity, gas, petrol and supermarkets. (Macron supporting Ukraine?)
Politicians are discredited since the treason of Hollande. French voted against Le Pen by voting Macron. It was a No and never a Yes.
Zemmour, tragically grows in polls, because again he touches on issues the average French is unhappy with, but again it is not a Yes to Zemmour, but a No to wokism, the failure of migration policies, etc.
France will reach a point eventually when the people revoke authority/representativity to the political established class and impose their demands through direct means.
Cheers from France
Zemmour has a huge fan-base. Like Jeffrey Archer, he has sold an enormous quantity of books. Like Jeffrey Archer, he reminds me of Maggie Thatcher, insofar as he represents large swathes of working people as did Maggie; in elite-speak, a ‘populist’. Unlike Jeffrey Archer, he is highly highly erudite. Like the Iron Lady, he is extremely focused, and has no time for fools. Hardly seems like an establishment plant, rather a highly disruptive, highly intelligent, maverick. Doubt he will be allowed to progress – the media is already running hatchet jobs.
Regarding left/right, does anyone still swallow that rubbish?
They must not wait! They must move now directly, take over and create socially as they go according to need and the facts they have to deal with in the process…reality.
Waiting is a waste of dangerous time that gives idle Armageddon-like evil hands opportunity to make even more catastrophic evil than they are making already.
It is time to arrest all those people, the elites and their minions, gophers…the brains they bought and turned into their makers and shakers. It is time to deal with them all in the ways the people in direct movement find efficacious as they go
Every year, Alain Soral turns out to be the only analysis of French politics with any predictive capacity worth mentioning. So, what can we expect now? Things will continue to unravel until the bodies in uniform step in over the lines and join the people against the illegitimate oligarchy. That is the best case scenario. Or they don’t, in which case the unraveling continues til all of western Europe consists of a patchwork of failed states, city states and warlord fiefdoms.
Alan Soral and friends are online at egaliteetreconciliation.fr.
But two things to note. (1) It’s nearly all in French, so you have to use Yandex or Google translation, which is a slight hassle but I’ve been very impressed with the accuracy of their French-English machine translations. (2) The Egalite et Reconciliation site is like drinking from a fire hose. It posts a ton of stuff every day To get acquainted with their thinking, you have to go into the achives, and you need to somehow focus on the more important themes and authors. A handful of people tried to make this dissident movement available to English readers, such as Joe Corbeau, but they got taken off the net, either by soft power or hard power. Non-French readers might enjoy the weekly posting of drawings, a few of which have resulted in fines and jail sentences because France has no free speech – unlike the USA.
Ramin Mazaheri didn’t explain how Zemmour is a fabrication of the elite. I hope he will in a future essay. The E&R crowd have written a lot about Zemmour, but in more detail than I’ve had time to absorb. You might think Zemmour is close to E&R politics, but in fact there’s a gap or even an abyss.
What is to be done about France?
Emmanuel Macron:
He was selected by this congregation: https://www.karlspreis.de/en/laureates Not by the French population.
Eric Zemmour:
The Holy Roman Empire created Zemmour to split the French National votes. But it’s already too obvious.
Marine Le Pen:
She was loved by the French until she accepted the election Fraud by Macron.
Traditional political parties:
They’re infiltrated by Holy Roman Agents. That is why we see the people in the streets all over Europe.
The left:
Formerly humane and honest, now infiltrated by Holy Roman Imperial Agents.
Unions:
Formerly a force to be reckoned with, but now infiltrated by Holy Roman Imperial Agents.
Polling agencies
Today, every western Polling agency are infiltrated by Holy Roman Empire Agents.
The Mainstream media:
Formerly the fourth arm of the separation of power in Democracies, now a propaganda whores for the Fascist Holy Roman Empire.
French Catholic Church:
It has been controlled by the Vatican since 1418, and like the Vatican uses pedophilia to F+++ up the next generation. The only different today is that it is being exposed all over the world.
Notre Dame Cathedral:
It was built as a National French Symbol, in a period where (German) Holy Roman Emperor Frederik Barbarossa was siding with the Papal reign of the Vatican, against the French Louis VII and the Pope Alexander III from Avignon. France lost the Papal seat to the Vatican in 1418.
Every time French Nationality is under attack, Notre Dame Burns.
When the French Revolution spread to all of Europa, the Royal dynasties of Europe and the Vatican realized a greater foe than fighting among each other, and united in a Fascist conspiracy against the people of Europe. That is the Un-Holy Roman Empire ruling EU of today.
Not only France but all of Europe has been hijacked since the Danes, Irish, French and the Dutch were the only Nations allowed to vote on the EU Constitution. And they all voted against it.
The longest French general strike from late 2019 failed, just like the 1930 union strikes in America, because the Unions are infiltrated by Imperial Agents. And because they are up against Fascist storm troopers collected from all over the empire, like in Spain under Dictator Francisco Franco.
Then corona was used to end human rights in all of Europe, thus preventing the Yellow Vests from marching. Now a Fascist corona passport has been extended until after the French Presidential elections.
But how should people vote?
It will not be a political figure taking down the Un-Holy Roman Empire, but a second popular uprising sweeping the entire West.
The Yellow West:
The French People has started the wave before; and they will start it again.
Guillotines are the only votes that Fascists respect.
As the article and your remarks make clear, France is in deep trouble. But I can’t help feeling that with les gilets jaunes, some sort of spirit is still alive there despite everything.
My former home on the other hand has wholly gone to the dark side. If tomorrow BoJo pronounced, “Okay you morons, the government today will shoot dead one in ten of you, it’s for your own good,” a voice would come back, “Hey, wait a minute Boris, you can’t do that! . . . oh, wait . . . oh, go on then.” And everybody nods.
France is a vassal of the Financial Empire. Please name a democracy that isn’t a suzerainty. If one can’t, then most democracies are vassals, controlled by the private money & control construct of the Empire.
Who are Macron’s masters? What are France’s core values (x), economic strength (y) and vassal position in the global order (z)? Poor values, low economic strength and middle position in the global vassal order.
Who does Emmanuel Macron owe?
“President Macron is often presented as a Rothschild Boy. This is true, but secondary… he owes his electoral campaign mostly to Henry Kravis, the boss of one of the world’s largest financial companies, and to NATO…” Really?
https://www.voltairenet.org/article204303.html
All the French that I know are very unhappy with Macron’s covid restrictions / vaccine mandate.
Right on cue, Zemmour appeared in an interview where spoke out very vehemently against the Covid restrictions…
I think many French understand Zemmour is deep state, but they are very sick of the current deep-stater, Macron and the current situation in France.
People all over the world is sick and tired of their loss of National sovereignty, loss of democracy, loss of human rights, Global wars, Financial crisis, Migrant crisis, weather manipulations, Health crises, Covid restrictions, Energy crises, hyper inflation and outright theft.
If there ever were a period in modern times to call the 21 years of tribulations, this is it.
Millions are wound up like a steel spring ready to burst.
All it needs is a spark to ignite a second “French revolution” spreading throughout the world.
What we see in Europe at the moment is only calm before the storm.
Com February, Paris is going to burn, the Berlin, and on and on it goes.
Don´t be afraid. Don´t fight their wars in foreign countries, and don´t fight against your own country men.
Humanity will unite and prevail against this evil, as it has don before in history.
“I don’t know how to cover France’s election…”. All elections in the 100% neoliberalised west since the early 90s have been irrelevant. If you want a recent election where something was really at stake for the people you would need to look elsewhere, for example Iran, Bolivia, Nicaragua or Venezuela. I think Ramin may have to invent a couple of imaginary but genuine candidates, one a real leftist and the other a real rightist, if he wants to keep things interesting.
In the 1981 election, the great satirical comic, Coluche, could have won. Too bad he didn’t go all the way. He folded to make sure the right wing would not win and so, he allowed Mitterand to get elected. That was one of those historical moment that didn’t come to be. Very sadly I think it was a one time opportunity. What I see is that, it is the grassroots organisation that is most needed, with the understanding of the pervert nature and the mechanics of the corrupt system. One little law that could be canceled to start with, would be the necessity for a candidate to acquire those 500 signatures from mayors. Coluche could get them, because he was super popular, as well as being an artist who mastered the media’s. I think the present masters won’t let that anymore.
The Machine, like an AI algorithm, doesn’t usually give a second chance.
The idea is that , without the 500 required signatures, we can conceive, in this age of social media and new waves potentially growing fast in popularity, that out of the 70% of the population abstaining from voting, enough could agree to vote for somebody that is not proposed by the « deep state », like for example Leonard Peltier, in the U.S, prisoner candidate on Peace and Freedom. Not too likely. Massive rebellion is much more so.
And yet, no matter what the breakdown is systemic, at all levels, unavoidable result of the financial system.
So hard to accept that we were wrong, so hard to be conscious of our responsibility in creating our reality.
OK, i am spinning my wheels again, stuck. It is a journey to stop the mind games, the pretend, and accept what is.
Thank you.
Coluche…I had forgotten him. Thank you for reminding me. And of course there was “Being there”, but maybe that is Macron, or Johnson or, come to think of it, any of them these days.
Coluche was easily the most popular comedian in France when he died in 1986. There is some reason to believe that the “motor-scooter accident” might not have been an accident because the French elite wanted him out of the way. You can find the evidence on the web, including somewhere on the Égalité et Reconciliation site However, I think we don’t have a smoking gun. In 1986, our paranoia and investigative journalism was not as finely honed. Now it’s easier to see that Michel Coluche was a problem for the elite, potentially developing into a huge problem as a “man of the people” with powerful humor and a big audience, if he hadn’t died. Now we see clearly that the French elite might have no problem with bumping off inconvenient people, including major celebrities, and there’s good reason to believe that the massacres of ordinary people in Paris was done for false flag purposes by the French deep state, not by supposed Islamic terrorists. That’s all been covered (in French) at https://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr/ if you want to “drink from the fire hose”.
I suspect that by coming out against the medicotyranny, Marine Le Pen profiles herself against Zemmour and, with all her faults, could mount a credible campaign if, thereby, she gains support among the yellow vest element. The desire to get rid of Macron and the technofascists and regain liberty would seem to be the biggest issue.
Really glad to see you back and covering a very interesting and relevant locus, well at least for me; here (Spain) nobody cares for anything as long as Moors do not invade the country AND Netflix keeps radiating.
I have been stumbling lately upon sources mentioning the French Revolution was hijacked by British agents intent of destabilising France, which could have loosely initiated a modernist impulse in the whole Eurasia, spreading dangerous and revolutionary ideals hindering British imperialism. Indeed, without brit takeover of the seas and plundering of half of the world during the XIX, we might not be writing here in English right now.
Sadly, France is undoubtely noyautée et parasitée by transnational oligarchs, whether they come from those who hijacked the Révolution or not, and has been terminally so since at least 2003-2004. I see the same problem as in Spain, you can’t “vote” any candidate which is not part of that. Not a single candidate *appearing in the ziomedia* (and thus legalized and authorized and bankrolled) will mention exiting NATO or the EU.
At least in France AFAIK you are not instantly labeled a “fascist” if you declare yourself a souverainiste, as it happens in Spain.
I’d be curious to know your personal opinion on Asselineau and Philippot… Do the lambda Frenchmen even know they exist?
“sources mentioning the French Revolution was hijacked by British agents intent of destabilising France …”
Lots of people would love to know about these sources.
Cosimo,
It was documented during the era of French Revolution itself, that a conspiracy of secret societies (esp. Freemasons) were behind it.. So over two centuries ago. And not really controversial since.
See here:
http://www.mujahidkamran.com/articles.php?id=63
This is key quote of 3 primary sources of that time:
“𝘛𝘩𝘳𝘦𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘴, 𝘈𝘣𝘣𝘦 𝘉𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘶𝘦𝘭, 𝘢 𝘑𝘦𝘴𝘶𝘪𝘵 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘍𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘩 𝘙𝘦𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘍𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘴𝘰𝘯 𝘗𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘳 𝘑𝘰𝘩𝘯 𝘙𝘰𝘣𝘪𝘴𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘚𝘤𝘰𝘵𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘥, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘑𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘥𝘪𝘢𝘩 𝘔𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘦, 𝘢 𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘳𝘨𝘺𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘕𝘦𝘸 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘥, 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘥𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘍𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘩 𝘙𝘦𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘶𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪-𝘊𝘩𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘯, 𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪-𝘨𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘵 𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘦𝘴.”
Churchill admitted as much, limiting it to the “International Jew,” which was facile. They were part of a larger network, which he another time referred to as the High Cabal. Like secret societies, their Banksters were in London for centuries.
https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/zion-protocols-eisner/
This is the key Churchill quote
“𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘮𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘢𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘑𝘦𝘸𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘯𝘦𝘸. 𝘍𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘚𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘤𝘶𝘴-𝘞𝘦𝘪𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘶𝘱𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘒𝘢𝘳𝘭 𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘹, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘥𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘛𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘴𝘬𝘺 (𝘙𝘶𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘢), 𝘉𝘦𝘭𝘢 𝘒𝘶𝘯 (𝘏𝘶𝘯𝘨𝘢𝘳𝘺), 𝘙𝘰𝘴𝘢 𝘓𝘶𝘹𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘨 (𝘎𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘺), 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘌𝘮𝘮𝘢 𝘎𝘰𝘭𝘥𝘮𝘢𝘯 (𝘜𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘴), 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥-𝘸𝘪𝘥𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘺 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘸 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘵𝘺 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘪𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘥𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘰𝘱𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘰𝘧 𝘦𝘯𝘷𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺, 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘭𝘺 𝘨𝘳𝘰𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘨. 𝙄𝙩 𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙮𝙚𝙙, 𝘢𝘴 𝘢 𝘮𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘯 𝘸𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘳, 𝘔𝘳𝘴. 𝘞𝘦𝘣𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳, 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘴𝘰 𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘺 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘸𝘯, 𝙖 𝙙𝙚𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙚𝙡𝙮 𝙧𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙜𝙣𝙞𝙨𝙖𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙩 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙜𝙚𝙙𝙮 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙁𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙝 𝙍𝙚𝙫𝙤𝙡𝙪𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣. 𝘐𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘧 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘴𝘶𝘣𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘥𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘕𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘵𝘦𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘩 𝘊𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘺; 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘢𝘵 𝘭𝘢𝘴𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘣𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘦𝘹𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵 𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘌𝘶𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘈𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘨𝘳𝘪𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘙𝘶𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘢𝘯 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘣𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘪𝘳 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘱𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘮𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘦𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘪𝘳𝘦.”
It appears to be our fate to see whether these long-standing grand plans, in their last mile, are realized or not.
I read the entire link at mujahidkamran.com. While it has important stuff, and its bibliography is valuable for anyone starting on a quest for the truth, it does not say anything about the “British agents” which Bourbaki mentions.
Does anyone have any data on British agents hijacking the French Revolution ?
Freemasons are spotlighted by E&R, in part because under French President Sarkozy, Alain Bauer, former Grand Master of the Grand Orient lodge (the largest in France), was in charge of security questions and was also the all-powerful “minister without portfolio” – powerful because he could deal with all the other ministers’ portfolios.
Alain Soral wrote that it was a color revolution and here’s his view on the genesis: In the 1600’s, the king began selling hereditary seats on the judicial bench, which began what French historians call “the nobility of the robe.” This greatly increased judicial corruption and power. The judges allied with businessmen early on, and Freemasonry provided some of the revolutionary ideology.
Alain Soral wrote:
“In fact, it [Freemasonry] is a counter-Church, an alternative to the Catholic Church. A threat identified very early by Pope Clement XII who, in 1738, condemned the organization in the papal bull ‘In Eminenti Apostolatus Specula.’ An action without effect, because no papal bull could have the power of law in the kingdom of France without being registered by Parliament – which this parliament was careful to not do, as many of its members were already Masonic.” Soral, Comprendre l’Empire, (2011) pg. 30; available (only in French) at KontreKuture.com – the E&R publishing house.
I am sorry, but Ino longer have my old notes with detail on this period.
The French and British were in near permanent war in the decades before the French Revolution. The French aided all British enemies, such as Americans in their revolution in the prior decade. The British were as vicious in meddling in French affairs. They could not have been unaware of Freemason plans to topple the Ancien Regime, which involved at least hundreds of lodges. They would have done their part to assist in the dissolution of the former Hegemon..
I found this [paywall] article by a British professor which appears to offer details of intrigue.
“British Secret Service in France, 1784-1792 by Alfred Cobban”
https://www.jstor.org/stable/556631
William Guy Carr’s “Pawns in the Game,” third chapter, follows the money trail, from Frankfurt to London.
http://www.lovethetruth.com/books/pawns/03.htm
Alfred Cobban, “British Secret Service in France, 1784–1792”, English Historical Review, Vol. 69 (1954), pp. 226–61
The first page is not a summary, but it can be read at https://www.jstor.org/stable/556631
Most American professors, graduate students and even some university staff have access to jstor.org. I hope someone can relay to us a summary of that article, under “fair use” that would not violate copyright.
The 1958 book by William Guy Carr can not be taken seriously because the writer gave no sources to back up his extensive and detailed allegations. Obviously, the truth of Carr’s allegations is a separate question. My guess is that Carr cribbed from books written as much as 70 years prior, but I haven’t read those earlier books so I don’t know if they are all blowing hot air. BTW, the entire book is available by altering the 03 to any of the chapters. I trawled through the 18 chapters, hoping to find the non-existent references.
Serious history books, gems such as Dr. Michael Jabara Carley’s 1939: The Alliance That Never Was and the Coming of World War II or Robert Stinnett’s Day of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor are filled with their sources. So when they make truly extraordinary claims, they can be believed. Less serious books quote other history books, but at least give some sort of potential trail of evidence.
Dear sir,
Look at Philippot and his party and you might find a positive angle from which to look at France’s current situation and above all where it might be headed.
Best regards,