by Jimmie Moglia for the Saker Blog
If flattery is the infantry of negotiations, then mendacity is the air force of politics. There are exceptions, but as a practical rule truth tellers are not deemed worthy of the public trust.
To the question, “who does the deeming?” the reader will have already answered euphemistically, “the mainstream media,” better known as “media from hell.” Meanwhile the social media conglomerates are now the official Ministry of Truth and the unchallenged administrators of the First Amendment, quietly turned into “Non-Freedom of Speech).
Social media that is notoriously under ownership and control of a caste-entity-tribe-monopoly that cannot any longer be mentioned on pain of severe retaliation, unless the mentioning is accompanied by slavish praise, shameless flattery and demeaning subservience.
If the reader thinks that I am exaggerating I am not. The New York Post recently announced and wrote that a popular social media venue has hired a team of talented Chinese software specialists to identify and censure any message containing turns of phrase or expressions that refer obliquely to the caste in question in order to avoid censorship. Some examples of concealed anti-something could be, “our elder brothers in the Abrahimic religion” (actually that’s how the current Pope calls them), “artists of circumcision”, “people of the TD book”, “los amos del mundo” (Spanish for ‘rulers of the world’) etc.
Actually, censored or shut-down websites, videos, podcasts, messages are now in the tens of thousands (according to those who dare monitor the phenomenon). And all is done with the punctilious thoroughness of elder brothers, from centuries used to money manipulation and its associated skills.
For example, I got involved in an exchange with a European group dedicated to history. At one point the question was raised about the time when the Nazi regime began being at odds with our elder brothers. I posted a message where I said that, “As late as 1934 there was coined in Germany a gold medal having on one side the Nazi symbol and on the other the star of David – to seal and celebrate an agreement with the German government, and the freedom allowed to German elder brothers to emigrate to Israel.” Then I added that the 1954 edition of their Encyclopedia stated that “a few hundred thousand” of their brethren died while in concentration camps, and that the Holocaust notion, or movement, or idea, or campaign had its beginning in 1972 in New York, along with the famous 6-million.” Information that is easily verifiable by most.
I then received the following message, “No one else will see your comment. Your comment goes against our Community Standard on Hate Speech. We have these standards to protect certain groups of people. We sometimes allow things we’d otherwise consider hate speech, for example when someone shares someone else’s hate speech to raise awareness about it.” Translation, “we allow hate speech only if it becomes propaganda for our own benefit.” I will return to the New York Post later.
Most will agree that, under equal circumstances, truth is easier to explain than lies. Therefore lying involves (sometimes but not always) a degree of skill and a certain finesse, required to deceive the deceivables – often unaware-of and sometimes even grateful-for the deception.
For example, until very recently, a person who carried a virus of some sort (as experts say that most of us do), but showed no symptoms, was medically called a ‘healthy carrier.’ Today the same fellow is described by the media (social and otherwise) as an ‘infected asymptomatic.’ Let the reader draw his own conclusions.
Equally, according to the same cabal who gave us the ‘infected asymptomatics,’ no western government ever delivered arms to the Syrian terrorists. The New York Times was not aware that “Timber Sycamore” was a CIA operation to arm Middle East terrorists, no western government ever said that the Syrian “Al Nusra” front was doing valuable work. NATO never created Kosovo, today a prosperous market of human organs, NATO never financed the islamists to assassinate Gheddafi, there were no jihadists in Chechnya and they never committed terrorist acts. European countries never gave refuge to Chechnyan terrorists, Al-Quaeda was a hermaphroditic, self-generated organization that never was armed by the CIA, Washington never helped the jihadists in Afghanistan before the Soviet intervention, Brzesinski never launched “Operation Green Belt,” to destabilize Russia, Reagan never said to the jihadist warriors that they were ‘Freedom Fighters”, Western media never praised Bin Laden, the Talebans were never hosted in Washington, Western media could not know that Saddam did not have weapons of mass destruction, Al-Baghdadi never founded Daesh in an American prison, the US-led coalition never allowed Daesh to get control (and destroy much of) Palmyra, the World Congress of the Uighurs is not financed by Washington, there were never terrorists in the Xinjiang province of China, and the Uighurs who fight with the terrorists in sundry countries of the Middle East are actually tourists. Epstein killed himself in a security prison where he was purposely detained to prevent suicide. And of course 19 drug-addicts from Saudi Arabia did 9/11.
As it is now common knowledge, H. Biden, son of the homonymous illustrious presidential candidate, forgot to pick up his water-damaged laptop computer from a repair shop. Which in itself is a telltale sign of a life-style dreamed-of by many and barred to most of us. I think that few among my 25 readers would gingerly give up an Apple device that runs in the region of 2 k-dollars or more depending on configuration – apart of course from any other consideration. Including the (possibly) implied conviction, by the owner, that whatever content was stored in the hard drive could not potentially do him any harm, given his exalted position in the firmament of power. Much like those who have no rule of action but their present humor.
Still the laptop, as it is well known, through various steps and iterations ended up in the hands of Rudi Giuliani (former mayor of New York and now a large cog in the Trump’s electoral machine). The hard drive of the device contains particularly damning, not to say, criminal evidence, besides the prostitutional peddling record of ‘money-for-introduction-to-people-who-count’, detailed by the New York Post.
Social media censured the New York Post message, but the reaction by the democratic candidate’s electoral machinery offers an interesting glimpse of the current culture at large. That information – they said at first – was but ‘hacked data gathered from the cloud.’
It is possible that many among 300 million Americans know what “hacked data gathered from the cloud” means, though it is not unkind to doubt it.
Such ‘data in the cloud’ justification brought to mind an episode of the unsurpassable and inimitable British series, “Yes, Minister.” It had to do with how the Minister and his immortal Civil Service director Humphrey Appleby dealt with a thorny issue. Namely, the announced construction of a chemical factory in the North of England. The factory would produce a deadly chemical that caused horror, victims and dismay in Northern Italy after a massive leak from the factory that made it. The chemical involved was called ‘dioxine.’ The MP (member of parliament) of the affected area asks for explanations. Here is the dialog,
MP. What’s the British Chemical Corporation up to in my constituency? There are some very worrying rumors about this new project and its dangerous chemicals… after what happened in Seveso, Italy.
Minister. The chemical in Seveso was dioxin, this is meta-dioxin
MP. But that must be virtually the same thing, the same name with ‘meta’ stuck in front.
Minister. No, that ‘meta’ makes all the difference.
MP. What does ‘meta’ mean?
Humphrey (intervening on noticing the Minister’s embarrassment). That is very simple, it means ‘with’ or ‘after’ and sometimes ‘beyond’… It’s from the Greek of course. In other words, ‘with’ or ‘after’ dioxin and sometimes ‘beyond’ dioxin. It depends on whether it is the accusative or the genitive. With the accusative it is ‘beyond’ or ‘after,’ with the ‘genitive’ it is ‘with.’ As in Latin, of course as you no doubt obviously recall, when the ablative is used for words needing the support of ‘with ‘ to precede them.
Bernard (the Minister’s secretary). But there is no ablative in Latin
Humphrey. Well done Bernard (laughter)
MP. I insist to know what is metadioxin.
Humphrey. Perfectly simple, Metadioxin is an inert compound of dioxin.
MP. What does ‘inert’ mean?
Humphrey. That it is not ‘ert’
Bernard. It wouldn’t ‘ert’ a fly.
Perhaps predictably, the ‘data in the cloud’ explanation didn’t last long, but the next was even better, at least as a follow-up to the sketch I have recalled. The information about the open and prostitutional influence peddling could not be true because the computer repair man who fixed H.Biden’s computer is blind. To be accurate the term used was ‘visually impaired.’
Though I am repeating what everyone knows, these responses, statements or justifications just demonstrate and reiterate the utter contempt that people who find themselves having, or being associated with, some form of political power have indirectly for those who elected their sponsor, as in H.Biden’s case. Needless to say, it insults the understanding of millions to suggest that a blind person would set himself in business to repair laptops.
Still, the ‘blind man’ explanation lasted less than the ‘data in the cloud’ theory. Even the Bidens, or perhaps the Biden electoral machinery, thought that H. Biden’s ownership denial of a costly personal object, whose ownership cannot be physically denied, would not fly. For it would create an epistemological problems of such magnitude as to load the logical and semantic resources of the English language with a burden that it is not reasonably expected to bear.
Hence the Biden electoral masterminds’ plan B was for Biden to ignore the laptop but to declare, during the second debate, that “he did not earn one illegal dollar” (or equivalent words) from the transactions that he or his son were involved in, in China or elsewhere.
As it is has been divulged nor denied, H. Biden amassed 1.5 billion $ through a shady deal with a Chinese bank. Compared to which the 1 million dollar yearly stipend paid to him by the Ukrainian company Burisma is the proverbial peanuts. A company, nevertheless, allowed to prosper in a finally liberated Ukraine, thanks to Victoria Nuland (of “f” the Europeans memory) and her orchestrated coup.
Who, Victoria Nuland (alias Nudelman) – and this we should not forget – declared in a conference after her triumph that, “We have invested 5 billion $$ to achieve these and other objectives.” Why this individual – whose ugliness is magnified by a diabolic expression – did not say what ‘these and other objectives’ were, must be left to the imagination of current and future historians.
What is readable and (allegedly) extracted from H. Biden’s laptop, seems to justify R. Giuliani’s statement that the hard disk contains ‘much worse’. The unofficial news is that it has to do with H. Biden’s Epsteinesque relationship with his actual underage niece. How much of this is true I or no one else without direct access to the data can say.
Yet a pattern arises that logically and culturally connects H. Biden, Bill Clinton, the Lewinsky business, J. Epstein and the Mossad. The connecting link is what President Maduro of Venezuela defined (in a different context) the “competencia de l’arrogancia”, the competition of arrogance.
As it is legendarily known, on prime TV, in court and in front of judges to whom he swore to tell the truth, Clinton had the gall to say, “I did not have sex with that woman.”
At the time, some remaining intellectuals not yet sunk into the quagmire of questionable think-tanks and equally questionable ‘research’ grants, made an interesting prediction. Prediction related to Clinton not being impeached, after so blatantly lying to the court and by inference to the American people.
The event, they said, abolished at large any required and elementary standards of ethical behavior in US government and, by extension, throughout the nation, in any realm, situation, relationship and/or institution.
It is no surprise, then, that very prominent in Epstein’s New York mansion, is/was a painting of Bill Clinton clad in Monica Lewinski’s nightgown – symbolically displaying a ‘consummation devoutly to be wished.’
Equally, it is not commonly denied that Epstein, his girlfriend/enabler Ghislaine Maxwell and her father Robert Maxwell – born Byniamin Hoch, English tycoon and later disgraced member of Parliament – are and/or were euphemistically defined as Mossad’s assets. Robert Maxwell was given a state funeral in Israel, attended by the most important charges of the state, after his mysterious death in the Canary Islands, allegedly due to falling off his yacht.
The ‘competencia de l’arrogancia’ also explains the extraordinary lenience towards Epstein, during his first trial, after scores of accusers came forward with their chronicles of pedophilia, sloth and debauchery. At the time, when questioned on the subject by journalists and representatives of the accusers, the attorney general Acosta said that he could not discuss the matter, nor give an explanation, due to ‘intelligence,’ or words to that effect. Where ‘intelligence’ could plausibly and possibly include ‘black mail’ involving some notorious bigwigs caught or actually photographed in the act.
Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial is many months away and perhaps by that time, the audience will not be that keen to follow the predictable extended hearings, arguments and counter-arguments.
Nevertheless it is not unreasonable to extend the link among the aforementioned heroes, to H.Biden, and the laptop saga.
There remains the speculation on what could occur in case of a Biden’s victory. I will attempt to answer indirectly by summarizing an interesting presentation, given very recently by a well known, respected and active Catholic theologian, as well as a strong critic of Pope Bergoglio’s Catholic Church directions.
The plan for the destruction of Europe and European culture, he said, –- concurrent with the elimination of states, contempt for traditional family values, promoted miscegenation, transgenderism and battle against the family – has a long history.
They first tried it with the Bolshevik revolution, and we know who made up the first Politburo. The second phase involved the 1960s revolution, where Freud took the place of Marx (thanks to the so-called Frankfurt school of Cultural Marxism). The revolution was successful in carrying out a full-front attack on authority, the family and related family values. One of the results has been the dramatic drop in birth rates among Europeans at large.
We are now at the third phase, the mass-invasion of Europe by third world aliens, under the leadership of Soros et al. We have already lost the battle, he said, but not the war – because God allows evil to occur but not to triumph. When and how the victory will take place, only God knows.
There remains the painful reality that not all elder brothers share the pseudo-sacred vision of a ‘kingdom on earth’ as promised in the ‘book’. But the dissenters, to all intents and purposes, have no voice. Furthermore, as the theologian added, there is in the tribe at large a cultural and deep seated hatred of the ‘other,’ which seems to defy any internal opposition.
Therefore, in the very proximate future, a victory by Biden will coherently result in totally open borders and unlimited immigration from third world countries, as it was in the plan of the elder brothers who historically promoted this as far back as the 1920s. After all Biden himself, in various occasion, declared openly to be ‘a fervent Zionist.’
There will be a further tightening of the still farcically called ‘freedom of expression,’ with more websites shut down and individuals targeted for harassment and/or harm in their life or profession. After all, the elder brothers who own the social media can censure an incontestably factual laptop-extracted message, furthermore delivered by a newspaper (The New York Post), founded in 1801 by Alexander Hamilton, one of the founding fathers, whose features are displayed on every 10$ bill. It follows as the night does day, that shutting down any or all other messages and sites at will, would not even be considered an event. In its sweep and reach, the non-being of their purported enemies is one more triumph of the ‘competencia de l’arrogancia’
The war on Iran, promoted by Hillary, will be back on the table and, who knows, even an actual military invasion of Venezuela. So far it has been the barren wish of an unattainable goal. But there is no disagreement here among the contenders. And since the Venezuelans have been defrauded of their money, it became plausible for the current cabal to deprive President Maduro of his life. And although their efforts so far failed, 15 million $ are still the extant reward for his head. It is doubtful that the policy will change, though hope is notoriously the last goddess.
What other curtailments of citizens’ rights are there in store I will leave it to the readers’ imagination. Without even accounting for the compounded effects of the Covid pandemic, which some sociologists consider a planned genocide of the middle and working class.
Finally, I don’t think it is exaggerated to say that, with a Biden’s victory, we would enter what the German poet-philosopher Hoelderlin called the “time of the night of the world”, and Heidegger the “time of total darkness” – to quote Italian philosopher Diego Fusaro.
By sheer luck we avoided an H. Clinton, but the dice rarely yield the same number on the next roll. And reason should inform us of the precarious condition of fortune’s gifts.
The war on Iran, promoted by Hillary, will be back on the table and, who knows, even an actual military invasion of Venezuela.
LOL! If the past four years haven’t been a total war on Iran, then I’m at a loss to imagine what would be. Likewise with Venezuela, the blob has learned its lessons well. Military invasions are costly, messy, and a PR disaster for the most part, requiring all sorts of convoluted ‘splainin’ to justify them. Economic and black ops warfare conducted out of the blinding light of a now totally compliant lapdog press and somnambulant American populace on the other hand…
I’d say that no matter who gets elected total warfare by any and every means possible with anyone and everywhere is always “on the table.” Including and possibly especially that damn uppity American populace itself!
Wonderfully written Jimmie.
I’ve been recommending this docudrama :
The Social Dilemma
2020
It deals with social media and will change people’s habits. The principles in there can be extended from social media through to any of the kinds of propaganda that you describe. Highly recommended.
In my LatAm country, I’ve often heard the words “competencia de l’arrogancia” which you translate as the ‘competition of arrogance’, used simply to indicate the fact of competence .. and how it is used in my corner of the world would be kinda … exceedingly competent in the use of arrogance (the words crisply bitten off in the expression, to drip with sarcasm.)
Both usages fit of course and I laughed, as that is a very special insult and stands in for the times that one cannot use infinitely more coarse language.
To Moglia, Amarynth.
“competencia de l’arrogancia”
can be viewed as “Thinking no end of oneself” or “having the Chusba (Hutzba) of thinking so supremely of oneself to the point of arrogance, and disregard of the usual norms.”
In general, its wonderful descriptive shorthand for activities of the Blob, Cabal etc.
Good writeup from Moglia. Fireworks begin from November 3.
Noel Monteiro
Noel,
Although I have to admit I never formally learned Latin, I believe Jimmy has, as well as his language “Italian” is a form of modified Latin. Therefore I would like to venture the explanation of how I see the expression “competencia de l’arrogancia”, which in my mind means: “the competence of arrogance”.
Arrogance, without getting into a long essay, can never be competent in any subject.
———————
Off topic.
Please take any further discussion on this subject to the MFC.
The Moderator.
It is very reasonable to state that if the NSDAP was Fascist, and Zionism was Fascist at it’s roots, and that both were allied, then the Vatican/RCC of the 1920’s and 1930’s was behind and supportive both aspects of the same phenomena, eager to destroy Socialism and preserve Europe as it’s domain.
Is that not a reasonable inference?
Thank you, Vladimir,
That’s a very good question. While I have no evidence that the Vatican supported the Zionists (now that you mention it – they would have wanted the Jews out of Europe) but I have overwhelming evidence that the Vatican created, supported, funded, blessed and protected the Nazis and has kept doing so to this day.
I am not sure why this foundational fact is allowed to be buried in a mess of innuendo, diversion and irrelevant facts.
Ken; Are you really not sure or are you simply being your usual polite self again? It is absolutely vital to the Vatican that there be mass denial about their links to the most intensely reliable anti communists; the Nazis. The Vatican has always been afraid of being usurped by what they fear as the spiritual and cultural power of socialism. They feared a rival in socialism. Hence their need for an anti communist savior; That was dear Adolf and his local Italian friend. But they live and breathe on their halo of saintly Christian virtue. So they stand to lose their “representatives of the Christian God” game if this gets out. For them it would be an institutional death sentence. Because the Vatican lives and dies on its appearance of Christian virtue. What else does it have to sell? So, in their eyes, if this connection were widely known the institution would be condemned and eliminated. This is their fear. Hence they do what they have always done; i.e., full on mass mobilization of collective denial and manufacturing of false consciousness. Just a modern variation of Roman Imperialism disguised as religion far as I can see. Does this make sense to you?
The knowledge of fascism in relation to Vatican interests and activity is well known, but fear and vested power interests mostly prevent this from being openly spoken of, as does to an even greater degree, the same terrible influence in Russia over centuries.
The fear and vested interest combined, creates the necessity to variously obfuscate or deny this fact, one that permeates our whole civilization today.
”We are now at the third phase, the mass-invasion of Europe by third world aliens …”
During the 1960s there was significant emigration to the UK from its former Caribbean Islands and colonies. The settled down and were easily absorbed to a 1. Common language, 2, the Christian (usually protestant) religion, and 3. A very similar culture, family life, marriage and heterosexual norms. Their integration was not difficult. They tended to live in the big cities and work in the public sector.
Other immigrant groups came from East Africa, Kenya and Uganda and were usually educated Indians – businessmen and academics on the run from the likes of Idi Amin.
However, immigration from Pakistan and the middle-east has been quite a different kettle of fish. 1. Different culture, 2. Different language, 3. Different religion. That was never going to work. Perhaps it was never meant to.
Brilliant article. Full speed to the target. In five to teen days we’ll know more but in any case it’s time to fasten the seat belts.
I have a lot to share with Jimmie and may be one day…who knows …
God decisions are not easy to decipher and the hazard is the Shadow of God.
Dear Jimmie. This piece of yours is very unhappy reading. But, happily, you have written it, as you always do, combining seamlessly a Shakespearean subtle musicality and intelligence with a Manuelian (as in Manuel from Fawlty Towers) kooky clunkiness. Pure genius. I am one of your select twenty-five readers. Please continue. And best wishes.
Thank you for this hilariously clever piece Jimmie. Thoroughly enjoyed reading it, barbs slyly delivered while appearing circumspect. ‘Elder brothers’, love the phrase.
As a service to your 24 other readers, allow me to put the link to the ‘Metadioxin’ episode that you mentioned.
https://youtu.be/ckgt4VWIsf4
Dear Mr. Moglia,
I am very glad that you use the expression “the 1960s revolution”, as, in my opinion, the Great Hinge (my own expression) of the world was the 1960 decade. In my opinion, there is the world from the Antiquity to the 50s and a little into the 60s, and the world from the 60s to today. If I take the example of France (I am French), the 60s destroyed without return the agricultural character of France (small properties), with the rural population going to the cities and the small properties being regrouped into large ones owned by the anonymous money of the Bank. The 60s destroyed the human character of the towns (French towns were so beautiful), with the introduction of a “cruelty architecture” into the urban domain. The 60s irremediably destroyed the previous musics, songs and dances, replacing them with American pop music and gesticulating dances, and today with all-dominant Caribbean and African musics. The 60s destroyed the traditional consuming habits (it was small shops, and credit-purchases practically did not exist). In the 60s, the mandatory schooling age was pushed up from 14 to 16 years of age (thus killing the French working class, as boys who had studied till the age of 16 no longer wanted to work in the farm or the factory like their fathers). Etc., etc. I do not continue as it would be very long to enumerate the structural blocks of the French society which were destroyed one by one in the 60s. But I must not forget the arrival of that superb tool of destruction, the Television (in the 50s, practically nobody had a television set).
The great majority of the plagues of today’s world, which you very aptly describe, date back from the 60s, when the power was withdrawn from the hands of the traditional dominant class to go to other hands.
Epina39, I agree with much of your view. The Sixties were indeed pivotal. This is described in much greater detail in a book by Bernice Martin called, “A Sociology of Contemporary Change”, published in 1981 by Basil Blackwell. According to Martin, there was a concerted drive at that time to overthrow all of the ‘old values’, of beliefs, of language, of customs, of dress, in ways of living, and the dissolution of all boundaries.
Since then, things have only deteriorated, but that marked the beginning.
Recently, The Saker wrote a piece, “When exactly did the AngloZionist Empire collapse?” Various alternative views have been put. The discussion was over particular events or moments in time. However, the contrived tumult of the Sixties contributed mightily to destroying the shared values that are essential for the stability of civilisations..
Thank you, Mr. Kennedy.
Merci. Je voudrais pouvoir dire que ce que vous dites n’est pas vrai, mais je ne le peux pas. Et bien que nous soyons inéluctablement liés à l’époque dans laquelle nous vivons, je considère toujours la France comme une seconde patrie, surtout mais pas seulement pour les raisons que vous évoquez. Et que nous avons vu dériver dans le royaume de toutes choses perdues.
Translation. Mod:
Thanks. I wish I could say that what you’re saying is not true, but I can’t. And although we are inevitably linked to the time in which we live, I still consider France a second homeland, especially but not only for the reasons you mention. And that we have seen drift into the realm of all things lost.
Agriculture and travel changed with the invention of the steam engine, art changed with the invention of photography and visual communications changed with the invention of the television. The internet has also amplified and changed communication. From one view these were restrictions whereas from another they were liberating. Artists found photography so consuming they needed to construct new ways of viewing things. Some were liberating but the majority were dreadfull. Similar effects with TV and the internet. The larger question is: how have these ‘advances’ changed the individuals relationship with family, society and country and are folk much happier as a result?
Dear Sir,
I like your text, it is very true. But digging farther into the causes will be useless, as a question of this type is condemned in advance.
Very well written article. However, if we get a Biden presidency it won’t be because he won the election. Rather it will be because Trump lost it. From the very beginning Trump decided to screw his base and support the never Trumpers. It is almost like Trump’s philosophy is “protect your enemies and screw your friends.”
The first thing he did was appoint a bunch of never Trumpers to key positions. Then he brought wall street democrats into his cabinet. What he did to Ann Coulter was a total disgrace. She was vilified by the main stream after she was one of the first people to support a Trump candidacy. She kept reminding him that his main campaign promise was to build the wall. However, Trump signed bill after bill that specifically stated that no money could be spent on the wall. Then he kicked Ann Coulter under the bus, just like he kicked many loyal supporters under the bus who worked their asses off to get him elected. He let his Jewish son in law Jared Kurchner control foreign policy. Notably, Kurchner was a registered democrat who never supported a republican in his life. If the Donald looses, he just got what he deserved.
There’s that “cultural” marxism” thingy again; that contrived foolishness that explains nothing while the looters and vandals of Davos, Wall Street and The City coordinated by whatever intelligence agencies de jour currently run amok:
[emphasis added]
Who are “they,” anyway? Try this:
The Father of the European Union–The Real Mover & Shaker Behind the Curtain
6-20-16, by M. Armstrong
Most people have never heard of the real man behind the curtain who inspired the whole idea of the European Union, probably because his books are only in German. They certainly do not realize that his idea was to stop the inbreeding within Europe by mixing people and races to create the United States of Europe. The idea was to intermarry all Europeans to end nationality.
Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi (1894-1972), was of noble birth and was very much an elitist. His father, Heinrich, was an anti-Semite who attributed religious intolerance to the Jews and said they were a separate race. His views perhaps influenced Hitler. Richard is the real father of the European Union, for his efforts go back to 1922 when he founded in Vienna the “Pan Europe” movement.
http://tinyurl.com/z6c9gnf
The Coudenhove-Kalergi plan – The genocide of the Peoples of Europe
9-7-13
Mass immigration is a phenomenon the causes of which are cleverly concealed by the political elites, and the multicultural propaganda is employed to falsely portray it as inevitable. In this article we intend to prove once and for all, that mass immigration is not a spontaneous phenomenon. What the elites try to present as an inevitability of modern life, is actually the product of a plan conceived around a table and prepared over decades, to completely change the face of our continent.
The Pan-Europe
Few people know that one of the main instigators of the process of European integration, was a man who also conceived the genocide of the peoples of Europe. He was a sinister individual whose existence is unknown to the masses of our people, but the political elites consider him as the founder of the European Union. His name is Richard von Coudenhove Kalergi. His father was an Austrian diplomat named Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi (with connections to the Byzantine family of the Kallergis), and his mother the Japanese Mitsu Aoyama.
Thanks to his close contacts with European aristocrats and politicians, and due to the network of relationships created his nobleman-diplomat father, Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi was able to work unseen, away from the glare of publicity, and he managed to engage the co-operation of the most influential heads of state for his plan, making them supporters and collaborators for his “project of European integration”.
In 1922 he founded the “Pan-European” movement in Vienna, which aimed to create a New World Order, based on a federation of nations led by the United States. European integration would be just the first step in creating a world government. His earliest supporters included Czech politicians Tomáš Masaryk and Edvard Beneš, and the German Jewish banker Max Warburg, who invested the first 60,000 marks. The Austrian Chancellor Ignaz Seipel and the next president of Austria, Karl Renner, took early responsibility for leading the “Pan-European” movement and later, French politicians, such as Léon Bloum, Aristide Briand, Alcide De Gasperi etc., offered their help.
With the rise of Fascism in Europe during the 1930s, the project of European integration was abandoned and the “Pan-European” movement was forced to dissolve. However, after the Second World War, and thanks to frantic and tireless activity and the support of Winston Churchill, the Jewish Masonic Lodge B’nai B’rith and major newspapers like the New York Times, Kalergi managed to gain acceptance for his plan by the United States Government and later the CIA became involved in driving the plan towards completion.
The essence of the Kalergi plan
In his book «Praktischer Idealismus», Kalergi explains that the citizens of the future “United States of Europe” will not be the people of the Old Continent, but a new mixed breed, the products of thorough and widespread miscegenation. He states that the peoples of Europe should interbreed with Asians and other non-White races, to create a multiracial population, with not clear sense of tradition or identity and therefore easily controlled by the ruling elite.
http://www.westernspring.co.uk/the-coudenhove-kalergi-plan-the-genocide-of-the-peoples-of-europe/
Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_von Coudenhove-Kalergi
European Prize for the Chancellor
1-13-11
The European Society Coudenhove-Kalerg has awarded Chancellor Angela Merkel the European Prize 2010. The prize is awarded every two years for exceptional contributions to the European unification process.
. . .
Angela Merkel is the second German head of government (after Helmut Kohl who received the prize in 1990) to be awarded this prize. The last time the European Prize was awarded in 2008, it went to the former Polish Foreign Minister and current Secretary of State in the Polish Government, Władysław Bartoszewski.
The European Prize is based on the vision of the diplomat, philosopher and publisher Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi. His family had its roots in several European countries. In 1922 Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi founded the Paneuropean Union, the oldest European unification movement, which attracted illustrious members including Albert Einstein and Konrad Adenauer. For this, he is deemed the founder of the modern democratic vision of Europe.
The Coudenhove-Kalergi Foundation was established in 1978 by the Paneuropean Union to strengthen the vision of European unification. In 2008 it became a society, with headquarters in Vienna.
[Emphasis added]
http://tinyurl.com/ztvdnej
For everybody’s information, Coudenhove-Kalergi was a benign social democrat compared with the ultra-Catholic fascist Otto von Habsburg who devoted his life to avenging the loss of Austria Hungary by destroying the USSR and Yugoslavia. It is Otto who was the real authority behind the Pan-European union and not Kalergi (whom Otto sidelined immediately). It was Otto who coordinated European right-wing (read Nazi) movements to work in sync with the CIA and the Vatican.
Please, don’t fall for attempts to turn the story of the Fourth Reich into some “social-democratic Jewish conspiracy”. It is the opposite – the EU has been and remains the primary vehicle of the Vatican’s political power and Germany’s policy of Drang.
Please, read the wonderful book by David Teacher which catalogues the evil that has governed Europe from the shadows – and no, it’s not the Jews!
https://isgp-studies.com/miscellaneous/cercle-david-teacher/2017-rogue-agents-le-cercle-6i-private-cold-war-1951-1991-david-teacher-5th-edition.pdf
Also, Einstein’s (for all his sins) Europe (social-democratic, tolerant etc.) is certainly not the same as that of the arch-Catholic and sub-Nazi Adenauer who rehabilitated large numbers of Nazi war criminals, integrated West Germany into NATzO and antagonised the Soviet Union.
I am starting to understand the sheer brilliance of the Vatican’s brainwashing operation which has ensnared most unthinking (that means most) people. Toss in a hint of conspiracy, a couple of British-sounding “institutes”, a social democrat or two and hopefully a Jew or two too, and 99% of the sheeple will NEVER look behind the curtains.
Jimmie, you never fail. I have been sitting on some thoughts regarding what you said about the “chosenites”
and finally I decided to add my $0.01 to it.
There is a Greek lawyer, who is also a writer, who is also a Nationalist, who wrote number of history books. Some of them are regarding Germany after Hitler came to power, as well as Soviets in those days. One of his not so little books, about 1500 pages is dedicated to the “forbidden” subject. He is on record as saying that he was dragged into courts no less than nine times, just so he could prove that what he wrote is based on documents. He won every case, as being a smart lawyer that he had no difficulty proving that everything is based on historical documents and vast majority were the printed words by the “chosen ones”.
I am not providing his name and the links to his surviving youtube videos, as number of the “controversial” ones were for obvious reasons removed.
Agree a 99% but….
What does the 1917 revolution and by extent bolchevic politburo (a derivating form) have to do with destruction of a “sane” Cultural Europe when misery and exploitation where the daily bread !?