France’s Melenchon to serve as Le Pen’s Minister of Finance
That is what’s known in the news business as an “untrue headline”.
If you are greatly upset at my ruse, just send me a stamped, self-addressed envelope and I’ll send you a refund for whatever you paid to read this.
However, I do have a serious point: Why aren’t real leftists like Melenchon cutting deals to join the Le Pen government, if she is elected?
Le Pen just did that with the 6th-place candidate in the 1st round vote – he’ll be her prime minister (more on him later).
It’s a great move, not because Nicolas Dupont-Aignan brings 5% of the 1st round vote, but because he helps show that a National Front cabinet will not be filled with only bozos, racists and fascists.
The 4th-place candidate, leftist Jean-Luc Melenchon, and the 2 far-left presidential candidates have thus far only said they will not oppose Le Pen. This lack of support for Emmanuel Macron is a damning indictment of his policies and person.
These candidates are being raked over the coals by the mainstream media for failing to stop the Brownshirts from coming to power. If you are reading this, you already realize the mainstream media are great stenographers but useless when it comes to intelligent political analysis.
My question is: Why is the Left stopping there? For the first time in decades the Left has some power and political influence, and they are not using it!
Leftists appear to be the swing vote in this election: will they vote Macron, Le Pen or stay at home (aiding Le Pen)?
There are no circumstances where Leftists can work with Le Pen?
I don’t know if Le Pen would make the offer for a top post in her government, or if Melenchon would accept it, but let’s explore the idea:
Interior Minister – the nation’s “top cop” – and Defense Minister seem reserved for the National Front. The best way to keep them occupied is giving them the chance to dress up and march around.
That leaves Foreign Minister and Finance Minister as the top portfolios. Melenchon would have a tremendous amount of domestic influence if Le Pen traded him the Finance Minister post in return for his support.
Melenchon doesn’t have the training for Finance Minister, you say? Oh, did Macron? He got his degree in public affairs.
So why did Macron get a job chez Rothschild? Because he had the right ideology, that’s why. The ideology of: I want money and will ruin anybody else in order to get it.
Economy is not a hard science – it is not even a science. If it was, we’d have found the answers by now. The “technocratic” lie should be totally debunked following years of Eurozone stagnation.
Ideology is everything in economics – “how should tax money be spent” is a question filled with moral implications.
Le Pen and Melenchon’s biggest difference is on the economy: Le Pen rejects Melenchon’s call for 100 billion euros in (much-needed) investment to be financed by a return to progressive taxes on the wealthy and corporations.
Wouldn’t – shouldn’t – Melenchon work with Le Pen for the good of France if she is willing to make this political horse trade in return for his support?
All of Europe needs a new Varoufakis: Imagine Melenchon, the best orator in France, going to EU and G20 meetings of finance ministers and reading them the riot act against austerity and capitalist cannibalization?
Before I get into the moral and intellectual defense of working with Le Pen, let’s prolong our enjoyment of this idea just a little longer before cold reality comes crashing down. Let me relate a personal story about France’s future prime minister (hopefully).
Trump-like, Le Pen’s future PM means increased chances for global peace
Here’s an interview I did with Dupont-Aignan where he proved to be an uncommon politician, and an admirable one.
It really shows why everyone outside of France should be praying for a Le Pen victory in the same sense that everyone outside of the USA should have been praying for a Clinton loss.
In my work as Press TV’s Paris correspondent I have to follow all of France’s foreign interventions, and there are many. The least-known one is France’s war in their former colony of the Central African Republic, the country subjected to more French military interventions than any other nation.
It’s a complicated story, but to be brief: C.A.R. leader/French puppet François Bozizé moved closer to China, and in punishment France stopped intervening militarily to save him. Instead, they allowed a group of opposition “rebels” known as Seleka to take power.
It was surprising for multiple reasons: France had bombed Seleka for years; Seleka had no coherent political program as they were fairly described as bandits; they were Muslims in an overwhlemingly majority-Christian nation.
Yet France did a 180 and starting supported Seleka, who overthrew Bozizé in March 2013. Later that year, France completely wrote a UN resolution getting that body’s support for Seleka to govern. Everyone was surprised yet again.
And then two months later France shocked everyone yet again by summarily pulling their support of Seleka, and also sending in 1,000 troops. This coup de grace totally destabilized an already unstable situation…which was, of course, the neo-colonialist/capitalist point from the very beginning. (So it should all be clear to you now.)
Things went – as everyone predicted – terribly: Seleka was totally unable to govern and spurred the outbreak of religious violence. Thousands have died, there are 500,000 refugees internationally, 400,000 internally displaced refugees, and 99% of the nation’s Muslims fled the country.
Yet another horrific crisis started by France to serve its own interests…it’s now called “The CAR Civil War”. The centuries-old peaceful cohabitation between Muslims and Christians is now a memory – a loss of historic societal proportions for the CAR.
That’s the story, and it’s not at all my fault if nobody has brought up Hollande’s humanitarian disaster in the CAR even once during the election campaign.
For a report on the situation in 2014 I went to French Parliament’s weekly (or twice-weekly) media day to get someone to admit France’s obvious guilt. I saw Dupont-Aignan, and he listened to my facts and gave an honest answer:
“We were very wrong at the time, and that’s very obvious today,” said Dupont-Aignan.
I normally wouldn’t use a short quote like that, but he said exactly what was necessary. (He also didn’t know anything about the CAR, but that only makes him the same as every French parliamentarian).
But I would only expect such honesty from a far-left politician. Believing your country is always right is not patriotism, but jingoism; it is akin to religious extremism.
I tried to find another honest politician but could not. I settled for a mainstream conservative, and you can see me arguing with him in that link, trying to get him to admit France’s errors in the CAR. Instead I got cut off and got vive la France:
“This is pure rubbish! We have been accused of the same thing in Rwanda and we were the only one to avoid genocide. So this is the Anglo-Saxon (sic) or many others who try to criticize France, but this is pure rubbish! Our aim is to stabilize the country. We are not against the Muslims, we are not against the Catholics – what we want is that this country be stabilized and live in peace,” said Jacques Myard, of the conservative UMP Party (now Républicain Party).
Quite sorry Mr. Myard, but your quote is total rubbish – about the CAR, about Rwanda and about what France truly wants for Africa.
Who is the danger to the CAR – Le Pen’s future prime minister or the mainstream parties?
Who is the extremist jingoist, and who represents a much-needed change which could encourage global peace?
Can I add that Le Pen wants to abolish the CFA Franc – another little known crisis-inducing piece of capitalism in 14 African countries?
If Dupont-Aignan had been a fellow communist I would be holding my nose in the air right now over our moral superiority; but because he isn’t, does that make him less moral or correct on this key question of foreign policy?
It is this type of blind party loyalty which is going to put Macron in power, despite an ongoing crisis.
Supporting mainstream politicians has put & kept France in a protracted crisis
Record-high unemployment, rampant corruption, complete 180-degree reversals on campaign platforms which are the antithesis of democracy, the grim prospect of achieving a lost decade due to the imposition of right-wing austerity which lacks any democratic majority consent of the people, youth unemployment which will set back the lives of our future generations, etc.
This crisis is made and sustained for obvious reasons: To repay bankers who made poor business decisions, and to lower the price of labor costs in order to increase profits.
When Francois Hollande couldn’t get what he wanted democratically, he simply bypassed Parliament in order to please the corporate class. What could be more fascistic than that?
Getting rid of the mainstream parties is not worth making a deal with the devil, but the National Front is not the devil, and they are certainly less devilish economically than the Socialists or conservatives.
If the Left joins Le Pen they may be able to implement many long-held leftist goals, help destroy the current mainstream political establishment, give the National Front’s non-fascist economic plans like Frexit legitimacy, create a workable coalition in Parliament and rein in the fascist elements of the National Front as best they can instead of giving them all the power to run amok.
What good will the Left do to simply sit on the sidelines and criticize, again?
Isn’t it more patriotic, more moral, to support Le Pen (who is no longer the leader of the National Front) and say, “It is I who am taking responsibility for protecting France from her reactionary aspects”.
Isn’t that really the moral thing to do: accept a burden instead of allowing people to suffer? Too bad Western Europeans don’t do “martyrdom”….
Isn’t the Left finished with their delusion that they can work with the mainstream?
Have you seen how far to the right the mainstream has moved economically since the fall of the USSR? In France, how could any Leftist not be equally ashamed to work with the Islamophobic, State of Emergency-imposing, Parliament-bypassing Socialist Party?
Melenchonistes should realize that they will NEVER be accepted into a mainstream cabinet. Heck, Socialist Party presidential candidate Benoit Hamon and others resigned from Hollande’s cabinet over austerity, and these were defections are by people who are pro-EU, anti-Russia, anti-Assad – i.e. not leftists, but centrists. And they were “too left” for the Socialist Party!
Is the Left’s plan to never punish the Socialists for doing wrong? The idea seems typical of fake-leftists: “never spank”, and ultimately give up when you can’t keep the hand from going into the cookie jar.
Or is Melenchon what many have claimed: an egotistical demagogue?
Is the idea to wait 5 more years and then hope Melenchon wins the presidency? Jean-Luc wants it all or nothing at all?
I see no reason why Melenchon can’t join forces with Le Pen, if only to get her elected and end austerity. His “not one or the other and also not telling how I’ll vote” attitude is totally ineffectual – as if the election won’t be held on May 7th without him.
Melenchon can join Le Pen, and then if he can’t rein in her worst impulses he can say so publicly and drop out like Hamon. Hamon’s leftist bonafides were improved by that – what is Melenchon worried about? The failure is not in failing, but in not trying.
Bottom line: Is this what Western democracy is? Don’t accept the results and just look down your nose at the winners, obstructing like hell for the opposition’s entire term? Why the hell should that ever be exported to any Colored nation?
Shouldn’t Western democracy be: compel the politicians to accept the results which the people have decided, working with the good and the flawed?
The other option is that we on the Left can sit back and watch the National Front fail. And when they inevitably do – Seleka-like – the public will finally realize that the right has proven themselves unable to govern, the center has proven themselves unable to be trusted, and therefore voters will finally rush in to the arms of the Left and give us the credit we deserve and a utopian love affair will begin and never end.
It’s a nice story. We Leftists tell it to ourselves often.
Hey, we are closer than ever since 1989 – it only took 30 years of turmoil and a decade of worldwide economic crisis. Maybe Macron will, like Hollande, last only one term?
Five years…the title of a David Bowie song, and one which is the “Thin White Duke” at his most insufferable, overly-arty and totally unfunky. He did that type of stuff a lot….
That ain’t my kinda Left: whiny, self-indulgent, gender-bending, Bowie-esque – fake leftism. When Bowie acted in a play by matchless leftist playwright Bertolt Brecht he chose a work which totally predated Brecht’s leftist enlightenment. “Baal” is poetic but its politics are 100% nihilist: all the Brecht cachet and none of the substance. I know the guy just died, but Bowie’s awesome rocker “Suffragette City” has lyrics which contain nothing about with feminist liberation, even though the musical results disappointed nobody…LOL, clearly I’m getting absurdly sidetracked here and just posting music links now.
France’s final-week campaign song should be Five Long Years by blues emperor Freddie King.
“Have you ever been mistreated? Then you know just what I’m talking about. I worked 5 long years for one woman – and she had the nerve to kick me out.”
Freddie the King was right, and I have no idea what his preferred political label was, other than “the Texas Cannonball”.
No way I vote for Macron and five more years of mistreatment. You?
Ramin Mazaheri is the chief correspondent in Paris for Press TV and has lived in France since 2009. He has been a daily newspaper reporter in the US, and has reported from Iran, Cuba, Egypt, Tunisia, South Korea and elsewhere. His work has appeared in various journals, magazines and websites, as well as on radio and television.
Marvelous! My idea. We should send (a translation of) this to the HQ’s of Marine and Jean-Luc.
Cheers!
Huge underlying assumption: Melenchelon is more of a Varoufakis than a Tsipras.
Varoufakis expressed support for Macron. Just saying, seems people have missed that.
Melenchon is more of an ideologue, while Varoufakis is more of an economist, and Tsipras more of a politician…. We need them all(in delicate balance).
Both Tsipras and Varoufakis are political wannabes, golden boys of globalists pretending to be people’s candidates. They sold out quicker than one could imagine in the worst of dreams.
“Isn’t the Left finished with their delusion that they can work with the mainstream?”
I doubt it. Certainly the mainstream average leftist may be. But those they call leaders today,aren’t really leftists. They almost never came from the “real working class”. Is there dirt under their fingernails from a hard days work (was there “ever”).So it really doesn’t matter to them who rules. They will still be “leaders” of their parties. And as long as that austerity doesn’t affect them personally.They are still willing to “work” with the mainstream.
Ramin,
I like your totally objective, rational, and linear reportage. LOL!
Great writing dude. Really enjoy it.
Gary
Like with trump, feeling enthusiastic about Le Pen isn’t a motivator. And as with trump vs clinton freakshow, probably the best one can expect is that people will be less likely to let her get away with the zionazi govno than they would macron.
Mr Ramin Mazaheri … I agree, the admirable Nicolas Dupont-Aignan provides Marine Le Pen with a fighting chance to avoid a national catastrophe and gives hope to other nations seeking to throw off their chains. It might also help if maybe you were to consider circulating the contents of the following URLs among your possibly numerous contacts
Real Big Money : Revelations by an insider from Coöperatie De Vrije Media more A ‘DVM-TV’ video production :
Interview with insider Ronald Bernard, Dutch spoken, English subtitls. https://vimeo.com/212237317, 7 April 2017
http://cooperatiedevrijemedia.nl/real-big-money-revelations-by-an-insider-video/.
Finance internationale et satanisme : le témoignage d’un initié aux sacrifices rituels 29 avril 2017 http://www.medias-presse.info/tag/ronald-bernard/.
Macron et le National Endowment for Democracy. Macron ciblé par la CIA ? Cette question sera-t-elle au centre de la prochaine révélation de Julian Assange ? https://networkpointzero.wordpress.com/2017/03/08/macron-cible-par-la-cia/.
«…The New World Order – a shadowy group of global banking oligarchs bent on establishing a one-world dictatorship – is trying to overthrow every leader on earth who resists. Russian President Putin is resisting. That is why the Western propaganda machine is calling him names. It is worth noting that Russia and Iran – the two nations most successfully resisting NWO regime change – are doing so in the name of God. According to Catholic intellectual E. Michael Jones, the 1979 Iranian Revolution was the opening salvo of a global backlash against secularism’s destruction of traditional values. Like the 1980 election of Ronald Reagan (driven by Americans’ disgust with the so-called sexual revolution) and the rise of Poland’s Solidarity movement (which opposed communist atheism), the establishment of the Islamic Republic of Iran was a landmark event signaling an end to the 20th-century wave of militant secularism and atheism – and a revival of traditional religion. President Putin enjoys overwhelming popularity in Russia due to his defense of traditional religious values. In his State of the Nation address last December, Putin said: ”’Many Euro-Atlantic countries have moved away from their roots, including Christian values… Policies are being pursued that place on the same level a multi-child family and a same-sex partnership, a faith in God and a belief in Satan”. Putin’s reference to Satanism was a pointed rebuke to the New World Order elites, who – though they push militant secularism on the societies they are trying to undermine – are closet Satanists». Putin puts fear of God in New World Order – Kevin Barrett http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/03/22/putin-nwo/.
Who’s godless now ? Russia says it’s us http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jan/28/whos ‘godless’ now ? Russia says its us.
Yours in haste … TMWNS
Varoufakis is not against the system and has nothing to do with Marxism or any revolutionary economic theory. He has admitted that he has never read any of the books of Karl Marx. He portrays himself as a “radical ” so as to sell more books and become more famous. He is a narcissist above all.
He supports EU and EURO and always claims that a EU dissolution is worse than death.
He served as Finance minister of Greece and the result was disastrous. A fake referendum that brought more brutal austerity and capital controls. In the meantime, Varoufakis disoriented the people with his antics and stunts.
About the Greek situation, better listen to Dimitris Kazakis ( he is an economist and has a political party EPAM ) and Takis Fotopoulos.
Varoufakis is a clown…..
Dear Ramin, I was ready to comment but XCV took the words right out of my mouth.
Varoufakis is a narcissist with the ego the size of… you name it! His self-love and self-importance brought Greece to the brink. Please, stop referring to him as an antidote to the crisis. Moreover, he is Europhile to the core, and would never be politically on board with what you would like him to.
PS: I will only disagree with XCV regarding the other suggestions he makes: Kazakis is an even bigger clown but less systemic (Varoufakis afterall was a University of Athens Professor). And so that I prove that “all pigs have the same snout”, take a look at this video from the Aganaktismenoi protests at Syntagma: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4KOc2Ktk5M.
Featuring:
-Varoufakis
-Kazakis: A know-it-all that talks through his behind, getting famous through the MSM during the Aganaktismenoi period
-Tsakalotos: SYRIZA’s current Greek FinMin, Varoufakis’ successor and current Greek salary/pension slayer.
-Katrougalos: Big law-firm owner, getting hugely rich from handling labour disputes against the previous governments, and then SYRIZA’s Labour Minister slaying pensions and salaries as ordained from the Troika
Bottom line: like Lionel (who I really respect for US politics coverage) got it all wrong on Macron on account for his poor knowledge of the French language and French politics (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhFBdavArZQ), please be careful not to do the same with Greek politics.
Fascist as insult[edit]
Main article: Fascist (insult)
Some have argued that the terms fascism and fascist have become hopelessly vague since the World War II period, and that today it is little more than a pejorative used by supporters of various political views to insult their opponents. The word fascist is sometimes used to denigrate people, institutions, or groups that would not describe themselves as ideologically fascist, and that may not fall within the formal definition of the word. As a political epithet, fascist has been used in an anti-authoritarian sense to emphasize the common ideology of governmental suppression of individual freedom. In this sense, the word fascist is intended to mean oppressive, intolerant, chauvinist, genocidal, dictatorial, racist, or aggressive. George Orwell wrote in 1944:
…the word ‘Fascism’ is almost entirely meaningless. In conversation, of course, it is used even more wildly than in print. I have heard it applied to farmers, shopkeepers, Social Credit, corporal punishment, fox-hunting, bull-fighting, the 1922 Committee, the 1941 Committee, Kipling, Gandhi, Chiang Kai-Shek, homosexuality, Priestley’s broadcasts, Youth Hostels, astrology, women, dogs and I do not know what else … Except for the relatively small number of Fascist sympathisers, almost any English person would accept ‘bully’ as a synonym for ‘Fascist’. That is about as near to a definition as this much-abused word has come.[43]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definitions_of_fascism
According to this not-so-reliable source, Mélanchon just made it official that he supports Macron and hopes to get a spot in the latter’s future government.
http://www.bfmtv.com/politique/legislatives-melenchon-se-voit-l-emporter-macron-la-partie-n-est-pas-finie-1154279.html#xtor=AL-68
Many good responses here, which require multiple op-eds to address!
A key point which I did not address is the June parliamentary elections. These are hugely crucial for France, if not to the rest of the world.
Either winner has no chance of winning a parliamentary majority – both are independents with small, untested, unknown politicians. So there is sure to be a government by “cohabitation” – different parties controlling key posts.
Melenchon will surely get an offer from Macron for a top spot, especially if his new party gains many seats in June. Melenchon will surely get an offer from Le Pen for the same reason.
But cohabitation mainly concerns the Prime Minister, whose job is to deal with with Parliament on behalf of the president. Le Pen’s decision to promise that spot to Dupont-Aignan turns history on its head – he is from an independent party and probably won’t have the votes to be approved by the Parliament! Le Pen will surely say that he must be the PM, because the people voted it that way, and she is right – that is democracy.
However, that will be a huge battle. If Macron wins his party won’t have a majority either. The only certainty is: Parliament is sure to have huge amounts of gridlock.
For those outside of France let me assure you – the presidential race is only the beginning of a very bumpy path. Not a lot of optimism for good governance in France once the final Parliamentary ballots are counted. But that’s another op-ed…or 5!
Ramin,
you presented a surface squabble in the sand box. You forgot the elephant who controls all.
Any machiavelism will not do when “les jeux sont faits.” Lets wait and see the beautiful France
go left side a la Cuba you so much liked recently – Ramin a utopia remain just that; believing that your beloved left is the panacea will not bring happiness now or ever, the poor french lost all sense of revolt and daring, from despair he fell into a deep depression.
Sad… and when one thinks that rhetoric a la Melenchon will put the bread on the table…
Where would France be without the CFA Franc?
http://www.siliconafrica.com/france-colonial-tax/
Can ‘democracy’ re-invent itself and save society from the otherwise impending collapse?
I agree with the direction of the article:
In fact, Le Pen has a historic opportunity, she can actively recruit all, the non-mainstream candidates, and negotiate overall target policy, thus forming an actual coalition, to represent the majority, and working the mechanics of (so-called) democracy to attain (what you and I must agreed upon is ‘required’) change, within the system.
This ‘left’ and ‘right’ labeling is a tool being used to confuse and divide the opposition to the agencies of ‘the empire’, in each nation-state branch office.
What is critical is the formulation of policy elements from all of the non-‘mainstream’ candidates, which redress the social structures favouring the elite 0.1% at negative sum gain to the 99%.
Averting the insane march to WWIII that the elite 0.1% is now pursuing, should be a clear, definitive ‘slam-dunk’ with the people, who understand, even if only at a sub-conscious level, that the 99.9% will only get catastrophic negative outcomes from any global war.
Le Pen must know that clinging to repugnant dysfunctional ideological policy platform-components will disable her candidacy.
That being said, she doesn’t want to disillusion her base.
Yet, at the core of the Le Pan and Mélenchon policies, there seems little conflict, though certainly, on the core issue of immigration, work needs to be done, and compromises on both sides made.
But let’s not lose sight of the most significant policy objective, emancipation from the global hegemony, ruled by competing faction among the 0.1%!
I clicked this hoping it would be true.. -Ramin, you’re one mean SOB.. !!! (Grrr)
Yet there’s no reason it can’t be true. Basically Le Pen is a workers party with border controls, like France used to have before Merkel took over.
It’s really crazy to hear the media call Marine “right wing”, “far right”, “right wing extremist” etc.. When she’s so far left of Macron, who is touted in the media as “centrist”. Macron represents fascism, the rule of bankers and international corporations. Hollande gave us a taste of what is to come with Macron.
Remember people in France voted Fillon(conservative Christians) and Melenchon(Syriza style resistance). Those voters will not vote Macron, I’m sure. Only way Le Pen can loose is if those voters don’t show up to vote.
Immanuel Wallerstein’s most recently commentary, “Anyone but Le Pen?,” is a very handy overview/guide to the French elections.
http://iwallerstein.com/france-anyone-but-lepen/
His conclusion:
“If Le Pen wins, how much of her program will she be able to implement? We have seen with Trump the difference between campaign rhetoric and promises and the capacity to implement a program. Because of the powers of the French president, LePen would no doubt do better than Trump, but how much better?
If Macron wins, his capacity to rule may be even less. In particular, how much of his neoliberal austerity will he be able to put into practice? I suspect not too much at all. If Resist seems strong in the United States, wait until a resistance movement plays out on the French scene, a country with a long tradition of such movements.
Does it sound as if I’m saying that it makes less difference than everyone is predicting who wins the second round? I do think it will make some difference, but not all that much. A Mélenchon government or even a Hamon government would have signaled real change. In France, as in the United States and many other countries, real change may be coming, but it will require some more years of struggle for that.”
Katherine
Re “Macron represents fascism, the rule of bankers and international corporations.”
Yeah! Why is the f-word being slung around so recklessly and pinned to Le Pen.
The tail is on the wrong donkey.
It is Macron who seems to fit the classic definition of fascism: an alliance and alignment of government and private corporations and finance.
Katherine
It sounds like you’re endorsing the Trump Art of the Deal. Trump is real. We’ll see about Le Pen’s real politik.
Very nice.