This article worried me for perhaps a different reason. Lebanon is one of the “seven countries in five years” targeted by US neocons. My concern is that information is being advanced to justify the bombing of Lebanon to “save” it from ISIS as was done to Syria.
Of special note, Hezbollah has cash in Panama and other tax havens.
Also according to Meyssan, the leak provides evidence Poroshenko has been abandoned by the Anglos.
‘Negotiations’ will have ended when the confiscations begin.
Expect major escalations ahead of the US and Russian parliamentary (September) elections. Putin will be hard pressed to keep peace or exploit these divisions for Russia’s benefit.
Another complicating factor, most Russian oligarchs are allied to the Rothschild zionists. Do the Russians and zionists have a secret deal? It is within the realm of possibility. Of course Putin just consoldiated control of critical forces into the new National Guard, suggesting his readiness to pivot according to the needs of Russia, not take orders from oligarchs with foreign backers.
War in Ukraine, if it wasn’t already, is now definitely back on.
The position of China is interesting. It appears they are siding with the Rothschilds, therefore putting Russia in a difficult position if they wish to reaffirm their old alliance with Anglos.
Either way, the dismantling of US dollar hegemony, which strongly favours Rothschild zionists, will not go smoothly if the Anglo faction feels over powered. All parties are playing dirty in an effort to enhance their respective positions, ahead of the day when you can no longer access funds at your bank or atm.
Expect more escalations, with possibly both Anglos and Zionists favouring operation Dabiq, an armegeddon type scenario, involving limited use of nuclear weapons.
The likelihood both Anglos and Zionists are committed to this catastrophic outcome, both seeking to draw out certain ‘benefits’ from people like you and me, emphasizes that voting for either Trump or Clinton is perfectly useless. Always the oligarchs will unite to defend their common interests against We the People, unless Vladimir Putin, our only possible champion, can work something out and institute multipolar NWO-lite, something which is less bad but still awful for most people living today.
Oh yeah, for sure. I’ll get right on that for ya Stavros.
Now, compared to your 17 word request, I estimate I’ve made roughly 20-30 posts with possibly 25 links over the last several months, on the topic of Anglos vs. Zionists.
Let me go back, find and review each one, summarize and then maybe colate the links so I can write War and Peace on your behalf (deleted attack on fellow poster. Against the blog rules.MOD) .
You link to Meyssan consistantly, as if he is a most reliable source. In spite of many of his opinions being nothing more than conjecture. What is most obvious to those who take the time to adaquately research topics and issues is that Mr. Meyssan obfuscates many of the issues he writes about; in service to some of those he often villifies. There are many more writers possessing a much better handle. Especially as it pertains to this specific topic.
You are taking that Thierry Meyssan article on Voltairenet to push your own political spin and agenda.
Firstly, the so-called conflict between the Anglos and Zionists you are peddling is not mentioned in Meyssan’s article. When he talks about how the Panama Papers is used to attack “non Anglo-Saxon tax havens,” he does not mean attacking Zionist tax havens (like Israel).
In fact, Meyssan explicitly states that, as a result of the Panama Papers, “The system is going to consolidate a bit more around the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, the United States and ISRAEL [emphasis added], so that these and only these will control it.”
And at the end of the article, he again states that “The system will thus remain in place, but from now on will have to function to the sole benefit of the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, the United States and ISRAEL [emphasis added].”
In order words, that bastion of Zionism, Israel, is to benefit from the Panama Papers, as part of the Anglo Saxon financial empire.
Secondly, Meyssan barely mentions Putin/Russia in all of this and certainly does not talk of Russia possibly allying with the Anglos. Meyssan also does not mention China at all–let alone the idea that it is allied with the Roshchilds.
Indeed, this very idea of the Anglos vs. Zionists seems to be merely another psyops/propaganda meme that is being aggressively promoted by the Controlled Opposition media to give the illusion of difference–much like the bogus differences between Demorats and Republicons.
It’s is very politcally disingenous that people are being steered to focus on individuals or factions (Anglos, Zionists, Rothchilds, Soros, etc.) rather than the entire Capitalist *system* itself and the American Empire, which is the mafia Godfather of this system.
Deception is a hallmark not only of the mainstream media but also of the self-styled alternative media as well–especially the supposed “alternative” Anglo Americans.
The bastion of Zionism is London UK. It is a long standing project of the so-called British Israel movement/ideology.
Zionism and the holocaust religion are a product of the Tavistock institute. Israel is a project of the Rothschild clan. Oligarchs of the super elites live in and operate from multiple countries. They are not strictly limited to this or that country, obviously.
The current Chinese elite has long standing ties to the Rothschild-British opium traders of the 19th century. Most Chinese leaders are Hakka Chinese, a kind of Chinese Jew, who has become infused with British supremacist modernist thinking. The closeness of Chinese leadership to Rothschild economic interests is well understood. By comparison US Rockerfeller interests are virtually non existant. This poses a dilemna for Putin because Russia’s old standing allies are Rockerfellers. Chinese-Russian cooperation is lukewarm despite mountains of propaganda to the contrary. China has given Russia no meaningful support since Maidan. I have given a possible explanation.
One thing that boggles my mind are those who set up idiotic parameters of what information can or can’t be considered.
Once understood, factions and divisions can be exploited.
You are attempting to lower the level of understanding of participants in this medium. You are imposing false limits which benefit no one except the globo elites whose first objective is always to remain hidden in the shadows.
If the “Anglos are against the Zionists,” as you insist, then why did the Anglos not go after Israel, which is a major global tax haven, with their Panama Papers?
As stated by the Thierry Meyssan article (which you cited), just the opposite is happening with the Panama Papers enabling the United States, United Kingdom, Netherlands, and Israel to tighten their control over the global financial system–together.
By your logic, are you insinuating that that Israel is not actually on the Zionist side?!?
And if “LondonUK” is the bastion of Zionism, then why is it that the United States of America and Washington DC are even more aggressive supporters of the Israeli apartheid state than the British?
For instance, in 2014, the British Parliament voted overwhelming to recognize the Palestinian state—a vote which Israel criticized and opposed.
Could you imagine the American Congress voting in a similar fashion to recognize Palestine? It would be inconceivable.
You also write: “The current Chinese elite has long standing ties to the Rothschild-British opium traders of the 19th century. Most Chinese leaders are Hakka Chinese, a kind of Chinese Jew, who has become infused with British supremacist modernist thinking. The closeness of Chinese leadership to Rothschild economic interests is well understood. By comparison US Rockerfeller interests are virtually non existant. This poses a dilemna for Putin because Russia’s old standing allies are Rockerfellers. Chinese-Russian cooperation is lukewarm despite mountains of propaganda to the contrary.”
China is allied with the Rothschilds. Russia is more allied with the Rockefellers. O-kay.
Which “Chinese” elite have long-standing ties to the British opium traders who poisoned millions of Chinese people with this drug, or are actually Hakka infused with “British supremacist modernist thinking“?
And are you alleging that Xi Jingping is a Rothschild asset? And what of Vladimir Putin–is he therefore cozy with the Rockefellers? Where is your evidence?
BTW, what exactly is “British supremacist modernist thinking”? Is this similar to American supremacist thinking and the idea that America is the Beacon of Liberty and the Exceptionalist nation?
“One thing that boggles my mind are those who set up idiotic parameters of what information can or can’t be considered.
Once understood, factions and divisions can be exploited.
You are attempting to lower the level of understanding of participants in this medium. You are imposing false limits which benefit no one except the globo elites whose first objective is always to remain hidden in the shadows.
You are a deceiver who works on their behalf.”
Have you ever heard of the phrase the Pot Calling the Kettle Black?
Last I checked, you cited Thierry Meyssan’s article in order to promote the Anglos vs. Zionists/China is allied with the Rothchilds/Russia is allied with the Rockefellers memes—even though Meyssan makes NO mention of these “theories”!
How is this not deceptive?
In terms of setting up idiotic parameters of what can and cannot be considered, I think you protest too much.
As I stated before, you proscribe the debate to focusing on particular individuals or political factions (Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Anglos, and Zionists) instead of the *broader* system: capitalism and the American Empire.
I have noticed that many American apologists eagerly embrace the very same memes that you are pushing. In fact, it’s almost like a political cult, as they will predictably condemn any heretic, who questions this dogma, of secretly serving the Rothchilds/Rockefeller/Illuminati, yadda, yadda.
Could it be that these memes are promoted because they enable Americans to avoid facing the criminality of their own country, and the essential role of the American Empire in the global system, which they purport to oppose?
By your logic are you insinuating Israel is not on the zionist side?
Yes
Israel is on their own side, partnering with whomever is most useful. Israelis hate American Jews. See Gilad Atzmon.
You say American apologist?
The USA is a behemoth. Should the people ever retake their country from the British Zionists, it will spell big trouble for said trillionaires.
America is scheduled for take down same as Europe. This will seriously disadvantage Rockerfeller interests and they are fighting back. Try to get your head around it.
Your hatred for Americans has blinded you to the reality of Zionism.
And no, I’m not an American, just someone who understands you should never blame the victims for the crimes of plutocrats.
Neither Rockerfellers nor Rothschilds are heroic. They are all sociopaths. We must unite against them and exploit their every division for maximum effect, same as Putin has been doing successfully for many years.
Try to understand because what I am describing is our only chance.
Which leads to the real reason we should be challenging the totalitarian form of governance the elites are creating. They, us, don’t need no damn democracy.
The position of China is interesting. It appears they are siding with the Rothschilds, therefore putting Russia in a difficult position if they wish to reaffirm their old alliance with Anglos.
We’ll likely know on/around this April 19 date what side China is on.
They picked the date a while ago; it has something to do with opening day of a claimed metals-only sales exchange, part of the SGE, to pull away centuries of pricing & pillaging by the western powers.
What is interesting is the date: April 19/2016.
It is a powerful 7 anniversary date from perhaps the single-most important piece of financial legislation enacted by England in the 18th century & imposed on their ‘colonies’ in north America, the Currency Act of April 19, 1764 (signed into law Sep 1/1764). So it will be 252 years to the day.
7 times 36; 36 is 1/10 of a circle, in degrees.
Recall Lagarde’s speech in 2014 about the numerology of magic 7–you can find it on youtube:
Occult Message in Speech by Christine Lagarde of IMF https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYmViPTndxw
Putin’s biggest problem is most Russian oligarchs are oriented towards the City of London and Rothschilds UK. With Chinese leadership also oriented and partnered with Rothschild associated interests, we see the extreme difficulty of Putin’s position.
Rockerfellar interests are much more in tune with those of Russia and nationally oriented Russian oligarchs, who tend to leave their assets at home. These are Putin’s main allies and many would dearly love to take back assets looted by Western allied former Bolsheviks.
Putin’s consolidation of the new National Guard is a pre emptive move meant to undermine Russian oligarchs residing in London, allied to Rothschilds, seeking to foment seperatism in various regions. These are the partners of people like Khordokovsky and now deceased Berezovsky. This gang are mortal enemies of Putin and the Eurasianists.
I believe Putin is searching for a delicate solution but in the event pro Rothschild oligarchs overstep themselves, it is lkely they will be crushed. Assasinations and nationalizations of epic proportions are not out of the question if things get ugly. It is possible that the long awaited nationalization of the Russian IMF central bank could happened but given the position of China, this is a less than ideal situation for Russia.
To add, note China is one of the original 35 countries to join the IMF, & even through all those years of war on their doorstep they never “unjoined”! interesting. (Korea 1950- 53; Vietnam 1946 when the Frenchies marched back in to 1975; short war vs Vietnam late 1970’s)
All they did is change the letterhead! LOL.
https://www.imf.org/external/country/chn/rr/glance.htm
China joined the IMF on December 27, 1945, as one of its 35 original members.
People’s Republic of China assumed responsibility for China’s relations with the IMF in April 1980.
The interesting thing about Christine Lagarde is how she came to power at the IMF in the first pace. Her predecessor, Dominque Strauss Kahn, was forced to resign because of a trumped up sex scandal–a case which has all the fingerprints of an American regime change operation to get rid of an asset who was getting too uppity and replace him with a more subservient proxy. Enter Ms. Lagarde.
But then again, this is not surprising, given that the so-called “International” Monetary Fund acts as a sock puppet for America to impose economic policies (particularly “external conditionalities” associated with IMF loans) serving US interests.
In fact, analysts like William Engdahl have argued that the IMF essentially functions as a collection agency for the American Dollar Empire:
“One of the crucial pillars of support for today’s Dollar System is Washington’s control of the International Monetary Fund, the IMF. The way this actually works is carefully disguised, behind a facade of technocrats and economic theory of free market ideology. In reality, the IMF is a modern era collection agency for the Dollar Empire. It collects its tribute, through major international banks, who use the dollars to further extend the power of American financial and corporate hegemony, in effect the driving motor of what is globalization.”
As Michael Hudson has noted, America has recently compelled the IMF to violate some of its own hallowed rules (like no loans to countries that default on loan repayments to other nations or no loans to regimes at war) in order “to mobilize the IMF basically as an agent of the U.S. Defense Department, with a side office on Wall Street.”
The IMF has thus come of the closet and revealed itself as “not an international institution for global economic performance” but as an “arm of U.S. Cold War diplomacy.”
Of course, there is one hallowed rule that the IMF will not violate and that is the ludicrous edict that an IMF policy change must receive 85% of voting shares—a rule that makes America the only country to possess a de facto veto of IMF policy, given its 16.7% share.
Every time I listen to Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, I am completely assured of the moral situation regarding the theater of warfare. I am moved myself, and I understand how his words must nourish and sustain the faithful. May he be blessed.
He reminds us that Hezbollah is in no hurry. It maintains the state of calm necessary to see its objectives through to their successful end. I’ve never heard such a description of purpose from a living person on the world stage in my time, although it might well have been said by the ancients.
The resolve of the fighters, says Nasrallah, is such that nothing but the necessary end is in their view, nothing whatsoever. Only the course of time is uncertain, and the time of the coming of success.
What is so wrong with the thinking of the enemy that he cannot understand that nothing can withstand such a clear view? And that only the mercy of time prevents this day from being the final reckoning?
I admire the spiritual poise of Sayyed Nasrallah, that he speaks his best truth, to be worthy of celestial approbation, while discussing the actions of fighters in war on the earth. He does it like no one I know. This is great statecraft.
@EVERYBODY: I just got an email warning me that this is not a recent speech, but it turns out that it is a republication of a speech of 2015 (here : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HDYLxfmYvc).
Sorry about that :-(
The Saker
This upset me, and it still upsets me. It was sent to me today, by a friend of mine who lives in a foreign country.
Its just a Child trying to Go To School.
https://www.facebook.com/DaysofPalestine/videos/1895594714000588/
Tony
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14_XW6unoQE
Thanks Elsi:
Very inspiring song and a moving testament to all the love and courage that emanates from the spirit of true matriarchal power.
Having just read Vitaly K’s disturbing report on the current state of the Lebanon, this comes as good news.
Will Sayeed NasrAllah become the leader to rally all in that factionalized country?
Because there really doesn’t seem to be any other candidate.
Anyway – go, Hezbollah!!
Correction – the report was by Andre Vitchek.
This is the link posted by GrandmaR in the Moveable Feast Cafe ( those great babushkas in this blog! ):
http://www.greanvillepost.com/2016/04/09/lebanon-now-it-is-being-forced-to-collapse/
Really worrying.
This article worried me for perhaps a different reason. Lebanon is one of the “seven countries in five years” targeted by US neocons. My concern is that information is being advanced to justify the bombing of Lebanon to “save” it from ISIS as was done to Syria.
More evidence of open warfare between Anglos (US-centric/Rockerfeller) and Zionists (London-EU-centric/Rothschild).
Why Panama Papers?
by Thierry Meyssan
http://www.voltairenet.org/article191236.html
Of special note, Hezbollah has cash in Panama and other tax havens.
Also according to Meyssan, the leak provides evidence Poroshenko has been abandoned by the Anglos.
‘Negotiations’ will have ended when the confiscations begin.
Expect major escalations ahead of the US and Russian parliamentary (September) elections. Putin will be hard pressed to keep peace or exploit these divisions for Russia’s benefit.
Another complicating factor, most Russian oligarchs are allied to the Rothschild zionists. Do the Russians and zionists have a secret deal? It is within the realm of possibility. Of course Putin just consoldiated control of critical forces into the new National Guard, suggesting his readiness to pivot according to the needs of Russia, not take orders from oligarchs with foreign backers.
War in Ukraine, if it wasn’t already, is now definitely back on.
The position of China is interesting. It appears they are siding with the Rothschilds, therefore putting Russia in a difficult position if they wish to reaffirm their old alliance with Anglos.
Either way, the dismantling of US dollar hegemony, which strongly favours Rothschild zionists, will not go smoothly if the Anglo faction feels over powered. All parties are playing dirty in an effort to enhance their respective positions, ahead of the day when you can no longer access funds at your bank or atm.
Expect more escalations, with possibly both Anglos and Zionists favouring operation Dabiq, an armegeddon type scenario, involving limited use of nuclear weapons.
The likelihood both Anglos and Zionists are committed to this catastrophic outcome, both seeking to draw out certain ‘benefits’ from people like you and me, emphasizes that voting for either Trump or Clinton is perfectly useless. Always the oligarchs will unite to defend their common interests against We the People, unless Vladimir Putin, our only possible champion, can work something out and institute multipolar NWO-lite, something which is less bad but still awful for most people living today.
What evidence (even circumstantial) can you present to support your theory about Anglos & Zionists fighting it out?
Oh yeah, for sure. I’ll get right on that for ya Stavros.
Now, compared to your 17 word request, I estimate I’ve made roughly 20-30 posts with possibly 25 links over the last several months, on the topic of Anglos vs. Zionists.
Let me go back, find and review each one, summarize and then maybe colate the links so I can write War and Peace on your behalf (deleted attack on fellow poster. Against the blog rules.MOD) .
Got a link re: China siding with Rothchilds?
You link to Meyssan consistantly, as if he is a most reliable source. In spite of many of his opinions being nothing more than conjecture. What is most obvious to those who take the time to adaquately research topics and issues is that Mr. Meyssan obfuscates many of the issues he writes about; in service to some of those he often villifies. There are many more writers possessing a much better handle. Especially as it pertains to this specific topic.
You are taking that Thierry Meyssan article on Voltairenet to push your own political spin and agenda.
Firstly, the so-called conflict between the Anglos and Zionists you are peddling is not mentioned in Meyssan’s article. When he talks about how the Panama Papers is used to attack “non Anglo-Saxon tax havens,” he does not mean attacking Zionist tax havens (like Israel).
In fact, Meyssan explicitly states that, as a result of the Panama Papers, “The system is going to consolidate a bit more around the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, the United States and ISRAEL [emphasis added], so that these and only these will control it.”
And at the end of the article, he again states that “The system will thus remain in place, but from now on will have to function to the sole benefit of the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, the United States and ISRAEL [emphasis added].”
In order words, that bastion of Zionism, Israel, is to benefit from the Panama Papers, as part of the Anglo Saxon financial empire.
Secondly, Meyssan barely mentions Putin/Russia in all of this and certainly does not talk of Russia possibly allying with the Anglos. Meyssan also does not mention China at all–let alone the idea that it is allied with the Roshchilds.
Indeed, this very idea of the Anglos vs. Zionists seems to be merely another psyops/propaganda meme that is being aggressively promoted by the Controlled Opposition media to give the illusion of difference–much like the bogus differences between Demorats and Republicons.
It’s is very politcally disingenous that people are being steered to focus on individuals or factions (Anglos, Zionists, Rothchilds, Soros, etc.) rather than the entire Capitalist *system* itself and the American Empire, which is the mafia Godfather of this system.
Deception is a hallmark not only of the mainstream media but also of the self-styled alternative media as well–especially the supposed “alternative” Anglo Americans.
The bastion of Zionism is London UK. It is a long standing project of the so-called British Israel movement/ideology.
Zionism and the holocaust religion are a product of the Tavistock institute. Israel is a project of the Rothschild clan. Oligarchs of the super elites live in and operate from multiple countries. They are not strictly limited to this or that country, obviously.
The current Chinese elite has long standing ties to the Rothschild-British opium traders of the 19th century. Most Chinese leaders are Hakka Chinese, a kind of Chinese Jew, who has become infused with British supremacist modernist thinking. The closeness of Chinese leadership to Rothschild economic interests is well understood. By comparison US Rockerfeller interests are virtually non existant. This poses a dilemna for Putin because Russia’s old standing allies are Rockerfellers. Chinese-Russian cooperation is lukewarm despite mountains of propaganda to the contrary. China has given Russia no meaningful support since Maidan. I have given a possible explanation.
One thing that boggles my mind are those who set up idiotic parameters of what information can or can’t be considered.
Once understood, factions and divisions can be exploited.
You are attempting to lower the level of understanding of participants in this medium. You are imposing false limits which benefit no one except the globo elites whose first objective is always to remain hidden in the shadows.
You are a deceiver who works on their behalf.
If the “Anglos are against the Zionists,” as you insist, then why did the Anglos not go after Israel, which is a major global tax haven, with their Panama Papers?
As stated by the Thierry Meyssan article (which you cited), just the opposite is happening with the Panama Papers enabling the United States, United Kingdom, Netherlands, and Israel to tighten their control over the global financial system–together.
By your logic, are you insinuating that that Israel is not actually on the Zionist side?!?
And if “LondonUK” is the bastion of Zionism, then why is it that the United States of America and Washington DC are even more aggressive supporters of the Israeli apartheid state than the British?
For instance, in 2014, the British Parliament voted overwhelming to recognize the Palestinian state—a vote which Israel criticized and opposed.
Could you imagine the American Congress voting in a similar fashion to recognize Palestine? It would be inconceivable.
You also write: “The current Chinese elite has long standing ties to the Rothschild-British opium traders of the 19th century. Most Chinese leaders are Hakka Chinese, a kind of Chinese Jew, who has become infused with British supremacist modernist thinking. The closeness of Chinese leadership to Rothschild economic interests is well understood. By comparison US Rockerfeller interests are virtually non existant. This poses a dilemna for Putin because Russia’s old standing allies are Rockerfellers. Chinese-Russian cooperation is lukewarm despite mountains of propaganda to the contrary.”
China is allied with the Rothschilds. Russia is more allied with the Rockefellers. O-kay.
Which “Chinese” elite have long-standing ties to the British opium traders who poisoned millions of Chinese people with this drug, or are actually Hakka infused with “British supremacist modernist thinking“?
And are you alleging that Xi Jingping is a Rothschild asset? And what of Vladimir Putin–is he therefore cozy with the Rockefellers? Where is your evidence?
BTW, what exactly is “British supremacist modernist thinking”? Is this similar to American supremacist thinking and the idea that America is the Beacon of Liberty and the Exceptionalist nation?
“One thing that boggles my mind are those who set up idiotic parameters of what information can or can’t be considered.
Once understood, factions and divisions can be exploited.
You are attempting to lower the level of understanding of participants in this medium. You are imposing false limits which benefit no one except the globo elites whose first objective is always to remain hidden in the shadows.
You are a deceiver who works on their behalf.”
Have you ever heard of the phrase the Pot Calling the Kettle Black?
Last I checked, you cited Thierry Meyssan’s article in order to promote the Anglos vs. Zionists/China is allied with the Rothchilds/Russia is allied with the Rockefellers memes—even though Meyssan makes NO mention of these “theories”!
How is this not deceptive?
In terms of setting up idiotic parameters of what can and cannot be considered, I think you protest too much.
As I stated before, you proscribe the debate to focusing on particular individuals or political factions (Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Anglos, and Zionists) instead of the *broader* system: capitalism and the American Empire.
I have noticed that many American apologists eagerly embrace the very same memes that you are pushing. In fact, it’s almost like a political cult, as they will predictably condemn any heretic, who questions this dogma, of secretly serving the Rothchilds/Rockefeller/Illuminati, yadda, yadda.
Could it be that these memes are promoted because they enable Americans to avoid facing the criminality of their own country, and the essential role of the American Empire in the global system, which they purport to oppose?
By your logic are you insinuating Israel is not on the zionist side?
Yes
Israel is on their own side, partnering with whomever is most useful. Israelis hate American Jews. See Gilad Atzmon.
You say American apologist?
The USA is a behemoth. Should the people ever retake their country from the British Zionists, it will spell big trouble for said trillionaires.
America is scheduled for take down same as Europe. This will seriously disadvantage Rockerfeller interests and they are fighting back. Try to get your head around it.
Your hatred for Americans has blinded you to the reality of Zionism.
And no, I’m not an American, just someone who understands you should never blame the victims for the crimes of plutocrats.
Neither Rockerfellers nor Rothschilds are heroic. They are all sociopaths. We must unite against them and exploit their every division for maximum effect, same as Putin has been doing successfully for many years.
Try to understand because what I am describing is our only chance.
For, in my personal opinion (agreement matters not), a much more interesting perspective on “Why” the Panama papers, I would suggest the following:
http://m.journal-neo.org/2016/04/14/post-democracy-the-real-message-of-the-panama-papers/
Which leads to the real reason we should be challenging the totalitarian form of governance the elites are creating. They, us, don’t need no damn democracy.
The position of China is interesting. It appears they are siding with the Rothschilds, therefore putting Russia in a difficult position if they wish to reaffirm their old alliance with Anglos.
We’ll likely know on/around this April 19 date what side China is on.
They picked the date a while ago; it has something to do with opening day of a claimed metals-only sales exchange, part of the SGE, to pull away centuries of pricing & pillaging by the western powers.
What is interesting is the date: April 19/2016.
It is a powerful 7 anniversary date from perhaps the single-most important piece of financial legislation enacted by England in the 18th century & imposed on their ‘colonies’ in north America, the Currency Act of April 19, 1764 (signed into law Sep 1/1764). So it will be 252 years to the day.
7 times 36; 36 is 1/10 of a circle, in degrees.
Recall Lagarde’s speech in 2014 about the numerology of magic 7–you can find it on youtube:
Occult Message in Speech by Christine Lagarde of IMF
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYmViPTndxw
@Anon 5:37 am.
Thank you for the valuable information.
Putin’s biggest problem is most Russian oligarchs are oriented towards the City of London and Rothschilds UK. With Chinese leadership also oriented and partnered with Rothschild associated interests, we see the extreme difficulty of Putin’s position.
Rockerfellar interests are much more in tune with those of Russia and nationally oriented Russian oligarchs, who tend to leave their assets at home. These are Putin’s main allies and many would dearly love to take back assets looted by Western allied former Bolsheviks.
Putin’s consolidation of the new National Guard is a pre emptive move meant to undermine Russian oligarchs residing in London, allied to Rothschilds, seeking to foment seperatism in various regions. These are the partners of people like Khordokovsky and now deceased Berezovsky. This gang are mortal enemies of Putin and the Eurasianists.
I believe Putin is searching for a delicate solution but in the event pro Rothschild oligarchs overstep themselves, it is lkely they will be crushed. Assasinations and nationalizations of epic proportions are not out of the question if things get ugly. It is possible that the long awaited nationalization of the Russian IMF central bank could happened but given the position of China, this is a less than ideal situation for Russia.
To add, note China is one of the original 35 countries to join the IMF, & even through all those years of war on their doorstep they never “unjoined”! interesting. (Korea 1950- 53; Vietnam 1946 when the Frenchies marched back in to 1975; short war vs Vietnam late 1970’s)
All they did is change the letterhead! LOL.
https://www.imf.org/external/country/chn/rr/glance.htm
China joined the IMF on December 27, 1945, as one of its 35 original members.
People’s Republic of China assumed responsibility for China’s relations with the IMF in April 1980.
The interesting thing about Christine Lagarde is how she came to power at the IMF in the first pace. Her predecessor, Dominque Strauss Kahn, was forced to resign because of a trumped up sex scandal–a case which has all the fingerprints of an American regime change operation to get rid of an asset who was getting too uppity and replace him with a more subservient proxy. Enter Ms. Lagarde.
Mounting Evidence that Dominique Strauss Kahn was Framed
http://www.globalresearch.ca/breaking-news-mounting-evidence-that-dominique-strauss-kahn-was-framed/25533
Regime Change at the IMF: The Frame-Up of Dominique Strauss-Kahn
http://www.globalresearch.ca/regime-change-at-the-imf-the-frame-up-of-dominique-strauss-kahn/24866
But then again, this is not surprising, given that the so-called “International” Monetary Fund acts as a sock puppet for America to impose economic policies (particularly “external conditionalities” associated with IMF loans) serving US interests.
In fact, analysts like William Engdahl have argued that the IMF essentially functions as a collection agency for the American Dollar Empire:
“One of the crucial pillars of support for today’s Dollar System is Washington’s control of the International Monetary Fund, the IMF. The way this actually works is carefully disguised, behind a facade of technocrats and economic theory of free market ideology. In reality, the IMF is a modern era collection agency for the Dollar Empire. It collects its tribute, through major international banks, who use the dollars to further extend the power of American financial and corporate hegemony, in effect the driving motor of what is globalization.”
“How the IMF Props Up the Bankrupt Dollar System”
http://www.serendipity.li/hr/imf_and_dollar_system.htm
As Michael Hudson has noted, America has recently compelled the IMF to violate some of its own hallowed rules (like no loans to countries that default on loan repayments to other nations or no loans to regimes at war) in order “to mobilize the IMF basically as an agent of the U.S. Defense Department, with a side office on Wall Street.”
The IMF has thus come of the closet and revealed itself as “not an international institution for global economic performance” but as an “arm of U.S. Cold War diplomacy.”
The new global financial Cold War: U.S. using IMF to ‘split the world’
http://www.sott.net/article/313029-The-new-global-financial-Cold-War-US-using-IMF-to-split-the-world
The IMF Changes its Rules to Isolate China and Russia
http://michael-hudson.com/2015/12/the-imf-changes-its-rules-to-isolate-china-and-russia/
Of course, there is one hallowed rule that the IMF will not violate and that is the ludicrous edict that an IMF policy change must receive 85% of voting shares—a rule that makes America the only country to possess a de facto veto of IMF policy, given its 16.7% share.
Every time I listen to Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, I am completely assured of the moral situation regarding the theater of warfare. I am moved myself, and I understand how his words must nourish and sustain the faithful. May he be blessed.
He reminds us that Hezbollah is in no hurry. It maintains the state of calm necessary to see its objectives through to their successful end. I’ve never heard such a description of purpose from a living person on the world stage in my time, although it might well have been said by the ancients.
The resolve of the fighters, says Nasrallah, is such that nothing but the necessary end is in their view, nothing whatsoever. Only the course of time is uncertain, and the time of the coming of success.
What is so wrong with the thinking of the enemy that he cannot understand that nothing can withstand such a clear view? And that only the mercy of time prevents this day from being the final reckoning?
I admire the spiritual poise of Sayyed Nasrallah, that he speaks his best truth, to be worthy of celestial approbation, while discussing the actions of fighters in war on the earth. He does it like no one I know. This is great statecraft.
@EVERYBODY: I just got an email warning me that this is not a recent speech, but it turns out that it is a republication of a speech of 2015 (here : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HDYLxfmYvc).
Sorry about that :-(
The Saker
They defeated the Israeli army. For some reason I don’t think a bunch of Captagon high Daesh losers will stand much of a chance.