I am afraid that in this video she was not very convincing, giving the impression that she was playacting. As I have written before, my personal opinion is that she is part of a psyops, the aim being for her to take over from Hillary and become the first female US President. Anybody who was (or still is) a member of the Council on Foreign Relations can only protect the interests of the elite. I hope I am wrong, but I have a nasty feeling I am not.
I agree … I like how she looks & I want to believe what she says … but in a the Joe Rogan Experience #1295, she identifies as the Military Commander-in-Chief rather than as the People’s President … & like you say, “…as a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, can only protect the interests of the elite”.
It’s about time the people realise that anyone being so promoted by the MSM & making it as far as being one of the two US Presidential Candidate the people vote for, is working for the ruling Elite, not the People.
That’s probably why Ron Paul was always beaten out of the run for President.
and likewise Gabbard who won’t even make it into any further debates. I think she’s on the level but I also think she knows the POTUS is a long term goal, she’s staking her claim and marking her territory, she’s only 38 so another 5 to 10 years all the old crones will be dead and she may well have a better tilt. It is a shame as the US needs someone like her now but if we’re honest it isnt going to happen whilst the MIC and the Octopus are ruling the roost.
you have a totally jaded outlook on life….what’s wrong is right – what’s bad is good – and especially what’s good is bad…wtf could Tulsi do so you would get off your throne. Even is she has supporters whom you have read are bad guys – even so – this message was brave and good and leading the people of America who are dummed down – in the right direction…Perhaps you are not aware of things Tulsi is aware of. The Clinton Foundation is one of the most powerful foundations in the world. Its got her name on it. She is still the purse string puller obviously.
What could she do? She could try some humility, perform an act of contrition………………….say, like, …………………publicly appologize to the people of Iraq for the pain, loss and suffering she and her nation caused them……………….on National TV. Bring forward a reparation claim to repay and repair the damage caused by fake weapons of destruction lies. Too radical? And I have neither a throne, nor a horse.
She said it all in a few short sentences. Succinct, accurate, confident…what an absolute breath of fresh air.
Is there a tiny glimmer of hope that she just might cause a change in consciousness in Mainstreet?
Sounds like the same “drain the swamp” line Trump gave to get elected in 2016 … look what happened to that … think this would be any different????? No. It’s the same ol’, same ol’, every time … the same back & forth … the same carrot to draw the people back to hoping THIS one will be different.
If Trump can fully withdraw from Syria and Iraq by Christmas 2019, there is no way Tulsi can beat him this time around.
In 2024, however, it will be a different story. Having said that, I’m amazed the number of US voters I meet in London who sincerely believe Hillary would be better than Trump. Most US people I speak with seem to be dead from the neck up, just like most British!
The United States is heavily propagandized. The propaganda is everywhere. At sporting events, they sponsor “Military Appreciation Days” (paid for by the Pentagon with taxpayer money) ; at stores ,when you get to the checkout counter, they ask you to “add one dollar” to your purchase price so as to “contribute to military families”; at airports they board military personnel first and so on and so on and so on.
The corporate media portrays every war as a noble effort to bring “freedom and democracy” to the world.
The educational system fails to tell the real story behind many wars and fails to train students in critical thinking skills.
I remember the New York Times endorsing Hillary Clinton because of her “foreign policy experience.”
Clinton had “experience” all right. She had probably been the worst Secretary of State in American history.
1) Her wars caused a refugee crisis which destabilized America’s best ally, the EU.
2) Her anti-Russia policies pushed resource rich Russia into the embrace of resource needy China. Because of the – with China’s manufacturing power coupled to both Russian and Chinese technical expertise – it had the effect of creating a Eurasian colossus which now threatens to marginalize the United States.
3) Her overthrow of the Honduran government created a North American refugee crisis, which helped to spawn the election of Donald Trump.
4) Her overthrow of Gaddafi turned the most prosperous state in Africa into a hellhole.
Any one of these things alone should have disqualified her for the presidency. Taken together it was a display of absolutely mind blowing incompetence.
Military bearing is lost on most people. Military people, especially officers are supposed to remain calm, speak even and explain positions. Which is what she does but her words don’t resonate as they should because she has no fire in her voice.
I noticed this after I left the Marines and entered civilian world and dealt with ignorant blustering people for work. Especially having lived in many places where people are more polite and far less inclined to be combative in their speaking styles. Arabs prime example, Asians too.
American style is more direct, more combative, less touchy feely.
If someone calls you a traitor, not just your words need to have power but so does your voice. You should sound in control but there should be a tone that says “I would love nothing better than taking this outside and physically destroying you – leaving you a twisted, cabbage and urine smelling heap of human garbage on the street”.
Trump, love him or hate him, tapped emotion and that was how he won. He did so by putting his one emotions into it. The proof is that the Left hates Trump more than the Right hates Hillary even though she had like a 20 year head start.
So who is the Harlot of Revelations 17? Is it HRC, who was the one overthrown by the Kings of the World? Or will it be TG? TG is dressed in scarlet in the photo, as is HRC in many of her appearances.
Tulsi is a good girl, but political ambition is an inexorable whoremaster. Having made her obeisance to U$ Friend$ of I$rael (obligatory wouldbe POTU$A) the good girl is led to her next little step on the downward path: to get ahead in the caucus race she now must cry for poor lost Eretz Kurdistan, the wouldbe $econd I$rael: owned by Rothschild, run by I$raelis and worked by Kurds.
Similar regrets from the attached post in Trump’s defense:
“HarryG BTL SyrPer News #304191
Syria gained a ton of land and resources without the death of a single soldier!. I am grateful to President Trump for that.
If Gabbard had her way, we would still be waiting for the Kurds to come around and negotiate with Syria so the US could withdraw “responsibly”. … Yeah ok, like neo-cons listen to Trump and the Kurds weren’t still trying to steal their own little fiefdom.
In this swamp of a world, the heroes are villains and the villains are heroes. How sad.”
She is still hostile to Russia and Iran. I don’t see how the zionazi war against Libya increased the threat of nuclear proliferation. She mixes genuine critcism of pindo war mongering while still positing Russia and Iran as “the enemy” and adds in some off the wall nonsense about nuclear proliferation.
Right. She still parrots the notions of
–Al Qaeda did 911
–Russia invaded Ukraine
She has taken good stands on Assange, and of course ‘regime change wars’.
But, is there any other kind of US war? She seems to think that the War on Terror is real and not manufactured by the the same people that Smedley Butler talked about in 1934.
What I don’t get, is why she remains in the military, knowing that the war she volunteered to fight in was based on lies, as is the Syrian war. Pat Tillman was disgusted by what he saw, but look what happened to him.
War has always been about theft of resources, always a lie that it is about something else.
Greed is an insatiable beast, those at the top are running out of new revenue streams and will go to war to increase wealth because whatever they have is NEVER enough.
It is not confined to any particular country, religion, culture. It is the worst of human nature and will exist as long as humans exist. Animals kill what they need to survive, greedy humans want far more than they could ever eat in several lifetimes.
There is only one way to stop them, make the consequences of their actions so horrible they will not attempt it again. Or wipe them from the face of the planet.
As long as the corrupt walk free, nothing changes.
Fascinating pro-Tulsi video from right-wing commentator
Fighting for free speech for all, a right-wing Youtube commentator goes to bat for Tulsi Gabbard (whom he does not support politically) against Youtube’s blocking of her ads, and provides from his own recent tussles with Youtube the first-ever proof that Youtube is NOT controlled by algorithms, but that human Youtube employees can and do block or unblock users’ content in a matter of seconds, for reasons of ideology.
NOTE: there might be some five minutes or so of “dead air” content to scroll through before the actual program begins. There was when I clicked on it, but it might have been deleted since then.
/
In case Youtube blocks this Crowder commentary:
#CrowderExposesYoutube
#YouTube2020ElectionBlacklist
While I generally like Tulsi’s current role exposing the utmost malignancy of the US empire, especially its unending wars under false pretexts, etc., I continue to be bothered and wary about her apparent innocent or witting political confusion on serious matters. (1) In this short clip, while she denounces Hillary’s poisoned imprint on US foreign policy, she also curses the ascendancy of Russia and Iran, as something inherently bad or undesirable “of our security” (“We have seen an increase in influence of Russia and Iran…etc.). (2) As stated, she continues to conflate America’s “national security” with that of the ruling class, the 0.00001% plutocrats, which is a central lie at the center of America’s justifications for endless wars. She should simply NOT do that, or when addressing the topic, be clear that USFP serves the interests of the super rich and not ordinary Americans, whose security is not at stake. These are not minor flaws in a supposedly progressive candidate, but then again in the rotten US political class, anyone visible on the billionaires’ media is also liable to be deeply flawed, and full of contradictions.
That is all very nice, but what Tulsi Gabbard refuses to address and acknowledge is that despite her justified criticism of the wars, she defied all logic and re-enlisted, after having found out that the military has been involved in illegal wars. Why would a rational person volunteer for an organization dedicated to evil and unjustifiable murder? Why would a rational person stick with the DNC that was responsible for these evil wars and for rigging the primary? I hope that Tulsi Gabbard is truly commited to peace, but politicians keep claiming to be, then get elected, and march us off to war. Tulsi Gabbard’s own political contradictions with re-enlisting for the military, and remaining in the DNC lead me to believe that she is less than sincere. I will not be voting for anyone.
Tulsi Gabbard wants to mandate tax payer funded “free” college for everyone.
In 1964, the annual cost of tuition at Harvard University was $2,400 two-thousand, four-hundred dollars ( spelled it out so that nobody would think that it was a typo!) I think that it now exceeds $250,000 a year. I think that median housejold income not adjusted for inflation in 1964 was approximately $7,000 a year. Does anyone else feel bothered by the education industries sheer gluttony?
Was watching Ronald Reagan’s 1964 Republican convention Time to choose speech. It is great to go back and listen to old soeeches to understand what was taking place at that time in hisyory, whether one approves of the politician or not, but the Harvard tuition figure was cited in that speech. It is a really great speech in many respects, imo.
Handing Russia to China has got to be the largest Geopolitical blunder or all time.
I am afraid that in this video she was not very convincing, giving the impression that she was playacting. As I have written before, my personal opinion is that she is part of a psyops, the aim being for her to take over from Hillary and become the first female US President. Anybody who was (or still is) a member of the Council on Foreign Relations can only protect the interests of the elite. I hope I am wrong, but I have a nasty feeling I am not.
I agree … I like how she looks & I want to believe what she says … but in a the Joe Rogan Experience #1295, she identifies as the Military Commander-in-Chief rather than as the People’s President … & like you say, “…as a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, can only protect the interests of the elite”.
It’s about time the people realise that anyone being so promoted by the MSM & making it as far as being one of the two US Presidential Candidate the people vote for, is working for the ruling Elite, not the People.
That’s probably why Ron Paul was always beaten out of the run for President.
and likewise Gabbard who won’t even make it into any further debates. I think she’s on the level but I also think she knows the POTUS is a long term goal, she’s staking her claim and marking her territory, she’s only 38 so another 5 to 10 years all the old crones will be dead and she may well have a better tilt. It is a shame as the US needs someone like her now but if we’re honest it isnt going to happen whilst the MIC and the Octopus are ruling the roost.
Why did I watch this? I am no psychologist but she acts and sounds like “Roz” from Frazier-and who the hell is Hillary Clinton?
you have a totally jaded outlook on life….what’s wrong is right – what’s bad is good – and especially what’s good is bad…wtf could Tulsi do so you would get off your throne. Even is she has supporters whom you have read are bad guys – even so – this message was brave and good and leading the people of America who are dummed down – in the right direction…Perhaps you are not aware of things Tulsi is aware of. The Clinton Foundation is one of the most powerful foundations in the world. Its got her name on it. She is still the purse string puller obviously.
What could she do? She could try some humility, perform an act of contrition………………….say, like, …………………publicly appologize to the people of Iraq for the pain, loss and suffering she and her nation caused them……………….on National TV. Bring forward a reparation claim to repay and repair the damage caused by fake weapons of destruction lies. Too radical? And I have neither a throne, nor a horse.
Hari-Kari is the only honourable way out for the Hildabeast
Antoinetta III
It’s hard to pop a bone over the possibility of any US politician telling the truth.
Bravo Tulsi.
She said it all in a few short sentences. Succinct, accurate, confident…what an absolute breath of fresh air.
Is there a tiny glimmer of hope that she just might cause a change in consciousness in Mainstreet?
Fingers crossed
Col
Sounds like the same “drain the swamp” line Trump gave to get elected in 2016 … look what happened to that … think this would be any different????? No. It’s the same ol’, same ol’, every time … the same back & forth … the same carrot to draw the people back to hoping THIS one will be different.
Tulsi Gabbard…first female US president in 2024.
If Trump can fully withdraw from Syria and Iraq by Christmas 2019, there is no way Tulsi can beat him this time around.
In 2024, however, it will be a different story. Having said that, I’m amazed the number of US voters I meet in London who sincerely believe Hillary would be better than Trump. Most US people I speak with seem to be dead from the neck up, just like most British!
Ted,
The United States is heavily propagandized. The propaganda is everywhere. At sporting events, they sponsor “Military Appreciation Days” (paid for by the Pentagon with taxpayer money) ; at stores ,when you get to the checkout counter, they ask you to “add one dollar” to your purchase price so as to “contribute to military families”; at airports they board military personnel first and so on and so on and so on.
The corporate media portrays every war as a noble effort to bring “freedom and democracy” to the world.
The educational system fails to tell the real story behind many wars and fails to train students in critical thinking skills.
The propaganda is across the board.
I agree … the only NOBLE war is is a defensive war fought on your own soil when being attacked.
I remember the New York Times endorsing Hillary Clinton because of her “foreign policy experience.”
Clinton had “experience” all right. She had probably been the worst Secretary of State in American history.
1) Her wars caused a refugee crisis which destabilized America’s best ally, the EU.
2) Her anti-Russia policies pushed resource rich Russia into the embrace of resource needy China. Because of the – with China’s manufacturing power coupled to both Russian and Chinese technical expertise – it had the effect of creating a Eurasian colossus which now threatens to marginalize the United States.
3) Her overthrow of the Honduran government created a North American refugee crisis, which helped to spawn the election of Donald Trump.
4) Her overthrow of Gaddafi turned the most prosperous state in Africa into a hellhole.
Any one of these things alone should have disqualified her for the presidency. Taken together it was a display of absolutely mind blowing incompetence.
Go get her, Tulsi. Tell it the way it is.
TG nailed it.
I think her issue is her speaking style.
Military bearing is lost on most people. Military people, especially officers are supposed to remain calm, speak even and explain positions. Which is what she does but her words don’t resonate as they should because she has no fire in her voice.
I noticed this after I left the Marines and entered civilian world and dealt with ignorant blustering people for work. Especially having lived in many places where people are more polite and far less inclined to be combative in their speaking styles. Arabs prime example, Asians too.
American style is more direct, more combative, less touchy feely.
If someone calls you a traitor, not just your words need to have power but so does your voice. You should sound in control but there should be a tone that says “I would love nothing better than taking this outside and physically destroying you – leaving you a twisted, cabbage and urine smelling heap of human garbage on the street”.
Trump, love him or hate him, tapped emotion and that was how he won. He did so by putting his one emotions into it. The proof is that the Left hates Trump more than the Right hates Hillary even though she had like a 20 year head start.
In unsurprising news Tulsi’s youutube channel is suppressed:
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/tulsis-youtube-suppressed
I can access it here with no problems (so far!):
https://www.youtube.com/user/VoteTulsi
The Saker
So who is the Harlot of Revelations 17? Is it HRC, who was the one overthrown by the Kings of the World? Or will it be TG? TG is dressed in scarlet in the photo, as is HRC in many of her appearances.
Tulsi is a good girl, but political ambition is an inexorable whoremaster. Having made her obeisance to U$ Friend$ of I$rael (obligatory wouldbe POTU$A) the good girl is led to her next little step on the downward path: to get ahead in the caucus race she now must cry for poor lost Eretz Kurdistan, the wouldbe $econd I$rael: owned by Rothschild, run by I$raelis and worked by Kurds.
Similar regrets from the attached post in Trump’s defense:
“HarryG BTL SyrPer News #304191
Syria gained a ton of land and resources without the death of a single soldier!. I am grateful to President Trump for that.
If Gabbard had her way, we would still be waiting for the Kurds to come around and negotiate with Syria so the US could withdraw “responsibly”. … Yeah ok, like neo-cons listen to Trump and the Kurds weren’t still trying to steal their own little fiefdom.
In this swamp of a world, the heroes are villains and the villains are heroes. How sad.”
She is still hostile to Russia and Iran. I don’t see how the zionazi war against Libya increased the threat of nuclear proliferation. She mixes genuine critcism of pindo war mongering while still positing Russia and Iran as “the enemy” and adds in some off the wall nonsense about nuclear proliferation.
I don’t think she is genuine.
Right. She still parrots the notions of
–Al Qaeda did 911
–Russia invaded Ukraine
She has taken good stands on Assange, and of course ‘regime change wars’.
But, is there any other kind of US war? She seems to think that the War on Terror is real and not manufactured by the the same people that Smedley Butler talked about in 1934.
What I don’t get, is why she remains in the military, knowing that the war she volunteered to fight in was based on lies, as is the Syrian war. Pat Tillman was disgusted by what he saw, but look what happened to him.
War has always been about theft of resources, always a lie that it is about something else.
Greed is an insatiable beast, those at the top are running out of new revenue streams and will go to war to increase wealth because whatever they have is NEVER enough.
It is not confined to any particular country, religion, culture. It is the worst of human nature and will exist as long as humans exist. Animals kill what they need to survive, greedy humans want far more than they could ever eat in several lifetimes.
There is only one way to stop them, make the consequences of their actions so horrible they will not attempt it again. Or wipe them from the face of the planet.
As long as the corrupt walk free, nothing changes.
Evil is, and will be, presented as the good and the righteous. ‘That is all ye know and all ye need to know.’
TG may be followed with genuine interest, concern, discernment, and continuing hope for the awakening.
Fascinating pro-Tulsi video from right-wing commentator
Fighting for free speech for all, a right-wing Youtube commentator goes to bat for Tulsi Gabbard (whom he does not support politically) against Youtube’s blocking of her ads, and provides from his own recent tussles with Youtube the first-ever proof that Youtube is NOT controlled by algorithms, but that human Youtube employees can and do block or unblock users’ content in a matter of seconds, for reasons of ideology.
https://theduran.com/tulsis-youtube-suppressed/
This is some really blockbuster content!
NOTE: there might be some five minutes or so of “dead air” content to scroll through before the actual program begins. There was when I clicked on it, but it might have been deleted since then.
/
In case Youtube blocks this Crowder commentary:
#CrowderExposesYoutube
#YouTube2020ElectionBlacklist
While I generally like Tulsi’s current role exposing the utmost malignancy of the US empire, especially its unending wars under false pretexts, etc., I continue to be bothered and wary about her apparent innocent or witting political confusion on serious matters. (1) In this short clip, while she denounces Hillary’s poisoned imprint on US foreign policy, she also curses the ascendancy of Russia and Iran, as something inherently bad or undesirable “of our security” (“We have seen an increase in influence of Russia and Iran…etc.). (2) As stated, she continues to conflate America’s “national security” with that of the ruling class, the 0.00001% plutocrats, which is a central lie at the center of America’s justifications for endless wars. She should simply NOT do that, or when addressing the topic, be clear that USFP serves the interests of the super rich and not ordinary Americans, whose security is not at stake. These are not minor flaws in a supposedly progressive candidate, but then again in the rotten US political class, anyone visible on the billionaires’ media is also liable to be deeply flawed, and full of contradictions.
That is all very nice, but what Tulsi Gabbard refuses to address and acknowledge is that despite her justified criticism of the wars, she defied all logic and re-enlisted, after having found out that the military has been involved in illegal wars. Why would a rational person volunteer for an organization dedicated to evil and unjustifiable murder? Why would a rational person stick with the DNC that was responsible for these evil wars and for rigging the primary? I hope that Tulsi Gabbard is truly commited to peace, but politicians keep claiming to be, then get elected, and march us off to war. Tulsi Gabbard’s own political contradictions with re-enlisting for the military, and remaining in the DNC lead me to believe that she is less than sincere. I will not be voting for anyone.
Tulsi Gabbard wants to mandate tax payer funded “free” college for everyone.
In 1964, the annual cost of tuition at Harvard University was $2,400 two-thousand, four-hundred dollars ( spelled it out so that nobody would think that it was a typo!) I think that it now exceeds $250,000 a year. I think that median housejold income not adjusted for inflation in 1964 was approximately $7,000 a year. Does anyone else feel bothered by the education industries sheer gluttony?
Was watching Ronald Reagan’s 1964 Republican convention Time to choose speech. It is great to go back and listen to old soeeches to understand what was taking place at that time in hisyory, whether one approves of the politician or not, but the Harvard tuition figure was cited in that speech. It is a really great speech in many respects, imo.
Tulsi’s gutsy and will go far !
America needs new blood and new direction not more of the same under past Democrats.