by Pepe Escobar, cross-posted with PressTV with the author’s permission
The consensus among future historians will be inevitable: the 2020s started with a diabolic murder.
Baghdad airport, January 3, 2020, 00:52 a.m. local time. The assassination of Gen.QassemSoleimani, commander of the Quds Force of the Islamic RevolutionGuards Corps (IRGC), alongside Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, deputy commander of Iraq’s Hashd al-Sha’abi, by laser-guided AGM-114 Hellfire missiles launched from two MQ-9 Reaper drones, was, in fact, murder as an act of war.
This act of war set the tone for the new decade and inspired my book Raging Twenties: Great Power Politics Meets Techno-Feudalism, published in early 2021.
The drone strikes at Baghdad airport, directly approved by the pop entertainer/entrepreneur then ruling the Hegemon, Donald Trump, constituted an imperial act engineered as a stark provocation, capable of engendering an Iranian reaction that would then be countered by, “self-defense”, packaged as “deterrence”.
The proverbial narrative barrage spun to saturation, ruled it as a “targeted killing”: a pre-emptive op squashing Gen. Soleimani’s alleged planning of “imminent attacks” against US diplomats and troops.No evidence whatsoever was provided to support the claim.
Everyone not only along the Axis of Resistance – Tehran, Baghdad, Damascus, Hezbollah – but across the Global South had been aware of how Gen. Soleimani led the fight against Daesh in Iraq from 2014 to 2015, and how he had been instrumental in retaking Tikrit in 2015.
This was his real role – a true warrior of the war on terror, not the war of terror. For the Empire, to admit his aura glowed even across – vassalized – lands of Sunni Islam was anathema.
It was up to then-Iraqi Prime Minister Adil Abdul-Mahdi, in front of Parliament in Baghdad, to offer the definitive context: Gen. Soleimani, on a diplomatic mission, had boarded a regular Cham Wings Airbus A320 flight from Damascus to Baghdad. He was involved in complex negotiations between Tehran and Riyadh, with the Iraqi Prime Minister as a mediator, and all that at the request of President Trump.
So the imperial machine – following trademark, decades-long mockery of international law – assassinated a de-facto diplomatic envoy.
In fact two, because al-Muhandis exhibited the same leadership qualities as Gen. Soleimani, actively promoting synergy between the battlefield and diplomacy, and was considered absolutely irreplaceable as a key political articulator in Iraq.
Gen. Soleimani’s assassination had been “encouraged” since 2007 by a toxic mixture of Straussian neo-cons and neoliberal-cons -supremely ignorant of Southwest Asia’s history, culture, and politics – in tandem with the Israeli and Saudi lobbies in Washington.
Trump, blissfully ignorant of international relations and foreign policy matters, could not possibly understand The Big Picture and its dire ramifications when he had only Israeli-firsters of the Jared“of Arabia” Kushner kind whispering in his ear.
The King is now Naked
But then everything went downhill.
Tehran’s direct response to Gen.Soleimani’s assassination, in fact quite restrained considering the circumstances, was carefully measured to not unleash unrestrained imperial “deterrence”.
It took the form of a series of precision missile strikes on the American-controlled Ain al-Assad air base in Iraq. The Pentagon, crucially, received an advance warning.
And it was precisely that measured response that turned out to be the game-changer.
Tehran’s message made it graphically clear – for the whole Global South to see – that the days of imperial impunity were over.
Any exceptionalist with a working brain would not fail to get the message: we can hit your assets anywhere in the Persian Gulf – and beyond, at the time of our choosing.
So this was the first instance in which Gen Soleimani, even after leaving his mortal coil, contributed to the birth of the multipolar world.
Those precision missile strikes on the Ain al-Assad base told the story of a mid-ranked power, enfeebled by decades of sanctions, and facing a massive economic/financial crisis, responding to a unilateral attack by targeting imperial assets that are part of the sprawling 800-plus Empire of Bases.
Historically, that was a global first –unheard of since the end of WWII.
And that was clearly interpreted across Southwest Asia – as well as vast swathes of the Global South – for what it was: The King is now Naked.
Surveying the shifting chessboard
Three years after the actual murder, we may now see several other instances of Gen. Soleimani paving the way toward multipolarity.
There was a regime change at the Hegemon – with Trumpism being replaced by a toxic neoliberal-con cabal, infiltrated by Straussian neo-cons, remote-controlling a senile warmongering entity barely qualified to read a teleprompter.
This cabal’s foreign policy turned out to be supremely paranoid, antagonizing not only the Islamic Republic but also the Russia-China strategic partnership.
These three actors happen to be the three top vectors in the ongoing process of Eurasia integration.
Gen Soleimani may have foreseen, ahead of anyone else except Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, that the JCPOA – or Iran nuclear deal – was definitely six feet under, as the recent farce these past few months in Vienna made it clear.
So he could have possibly foreseen that with a new administration under President EbrahimRaisi, Tehran would finally abandon any hope of being “accepted” by the collective West and wholeheartedly embrace its Eurasian destiny.
Years before the assassination, Gen. Soleimanihad already envisaged a “normalization” between the Israeli regime and Persian Gulf monarchies.
At the same time he was also very much aware of the Arab League 2002 position – shared, among others, by Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon: a “normalization” cannot even begin to be discussed without an independent – and viable – Palestinian state under 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as capital.
Gen. Soleimani did see the Big Picture all across West Asia, from Cairo to Tehran and from the Bosphorus to the Bab-al-Mandeb. He certainly foresaw the inevitable “normalization” of Syria in the Arab world – and even with Turkey, now a work in progress.
He arguably had imprinted in his brain the possible timeline followed by the Empire of Chaos to completely ditch Afghanistan – though certainly not the extent of the humiliating retreat – and how that would reconfigure all bets from West Asia to Central Asia.
What he certainly didn’t know was that the Empire left Afghanistan to concentrate all its Divide and Rule/strategy of chaos bets on Ukraine, in a lethal proxy war against Russia.
It’s easy to see Gen.Soleimani foreseeing Abu Dhabi’s Mohammad bin Zayed (MbZ), MbS’s mentor, placing his bets simultaneously on an Israel-Emirates free trade deal and a détente with Iran.
He could have been part of the diplomatic team when MbZ’ssecurity advisor Sheikh Tahnoonmet with President Raisi in Tehran over a year ago, even discussing the war in Yemen.
He could also have foreseen what took place this past weekend in Brasilia, on the sidelines of the dramatic return of Lula to the Brazilian presidency: Saudi and Iranian officials, in neutral territory, discussing their possible détente.
As the whole chessboard across West Asia is being reconfigured at breakneck speed, perhaps the only developmentGen.Soleimani would not have foreseen is the petro-yuan displacing the petrodollar “in the space of three to five years”, as suggested by Chinese President Xi Jinping in his recent landmark summit with the GCC.
I have a dream
The profound reverence towards Gen. Soleimani expressed by every layer of Iranian society – from the grassroots to the leadership – has certainly translated into honoring his life’s work by finding Iran’s deserved place in multipolarity.
Iran is now solidified as one of the key nodes of the New Silk Roads in Southwest Asia. The Iran-China strategic partnership, boosted by Tehran’s accession to the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)in 2002, is as strong geoeconomically and geopolitically as the interlocking partnerships with two other BRICS members, Russia and India. In 2023, Iran is set to become a member of BRICS+.
In parallel, the Iran/Russia/China triad will be deeply involved in the reconstruction of Syria – complete with BRI projects ranging from the Iran-Iraq-Syria-Eastern Mediterranean railway to, in the near future, the Iran-Iraq-Syria gas pipeline, arguably the key factor that provoked the American proxy war against Damascus.
Soleimaniis today revered at the Imam Reza shrine in Mashhad, at the al-Aqsa mosque in Palestine, at the dazzling late baroque Duomo in Ragusa in southeast Sicily, at a stupa high in the Himalayas, or a mural in a street in Caracas.
All across the Global South, there’s a feeling in the air: the new world being born – hopefully, more equal and fair – was somehow dreamed of by the victim of the murder that unleashed the Raging Twenties.
Pepe Escobar is a Eurasia-wide geopolitical analyst and author. His latest book is Raging Twenties.
I humbly join in the deep reverence for General Soleimani
@ Pepe
“…Soleimaniis today revered at the Imam Reza shrine in Mashhad, at the al-Aqsa mosque in Palestine, at the dazzling late baroque Duomo in Ragusa in southeast Sicily, at a stupa high in the Himalayas, or a mural in a street in Caracas…
——————————-
Obrigado, Pepe, very much so for this one.
I find myself very surprised for Shahid Soleimani’s role as the architect of the new and strong relations between Iran and Russia were not highlighted in your article. Neither you mentioned his decisive role in Russia’s decision to intervene in Syria, a crucial step in Russia’s geopolitical strategy.
For obvious reasons, neither Iran nor Russia could confirm nor deny the role of Soleimani as Ayatollah Khamenei’s envoy to Russia, however, his footprints were all over Moscow, in meetings with Putin that Peskov denied, or meetings with Russian top brass, Shoigu and Putin included.
On a 2016 article, Gazeta.ru describes Soleimani’s first visit to Russia, on July 24-26, 2015, and his first meeting with Putin and Shoigu. The description is based on an article published by Reuters, enough reason to take it with a salt dispenser, however, I have read the same story, different versions, from multiple sources, some more credible than others.
https://www.gazeta.ru/politics/2016/09/29_a_10222325.shtml?updated#page1
September 30, 2016, 22: 11 Politics
The Iranian who brought Russia to Syria
—————————————————–
Who is Qassem Soleimani, the Iranian “architect” of the Russian operation in Syria
————————————————————————————————————–
“Soleimani laid out a map of Syria on the table. The Russians were very concerned and felt that the situation was rapidly deteriorating, that there was a serious threat to the Assad regime. — The Iranians have convinced them that there is still an opportunity to seize the initiative. Soleimani then played an important role in assuring them that all is not lost.”
——————————————————
Soleimani didn’t have to spend too much time convincing the Russians about the clear and present danger of having Syria falling in the hands of the CIA/MI6/Mossad created “muslims.” A “caliphate” smacked at the center of West Asia would have threatened Russia’s soft underbelly, potentially exploiting the smoldering resentment against Russia from sectors of the Muslim population who still remember the recent wars Russia waged against islamic radicals in the Caucasus.
In a way, Soleimani was a bridge in the development of new relations with Russia.
Iran’s perception of the former Soviet Union under Khomeini was that of a “Godless” empire, not worthy of Iran’s trust. On the contrary, the Soviet Union invasion of Afghanistan greatly contributed to Iran’s watchful distrust of Russia. Fast forward to the new Russia, Khomeini gone, every crisis an opportunity, Iran knew Russia was in serious danger of losing their naval base in Syria, and more.
Soleimani became a frequent traveler to Russia, a trusted go-between, interfacing with Putin and Shoigu who came to trust him completely. Soleimani’s humble, unassuming character, always preferring the shadows than the limelight, was easy to get along with.
From the same article,
In the same month, Russia sent supply ships through the Bosporus, and on September 9, it became known about Russia’s participation in the Syrian conflict — even before Moscow officially confirmed it.
In total, it is known about four trips of Qassem Soleimani to Moscow: in late July, early August, December 2015, and mid-April 2016. Information about the first two visits was provided to Reuters by sources in the US intelligence services and the Iranian government. The subsequent ones were reported by the Iranian Fars news agency and the American Fox News channel.
Informed source ” Gazeta.Ru ” confirmed that Soleimani had visited Moscow several times, including last winter.
“They trust Kasem, they discuss arms supplies with him,” he said. Soleimani discussed the Syrian operation with his Russian colleagues back in 2013, but the destabilization of the situation in Ukraine slowed down these consultations for two years.
——————————————–
At some point, even FARS NEWS AGENCY, mouthpiece to the IRGC, began gloating about Soleimani’s trips to Moscow.
https://www.farsnews.ir/en/news/13940925000445/Unfficial-Srce-General-Sleimani-Visis-Rssia
Unofficial Source: General Soleimani Visits Russia
————————————————————————
TEHRAN (FNA)- Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) Quds Force Commander Major General Qassem Soleimani traveled to Moscow last week to meet President Vladimir Putin and high-ranking Russian commanders, unofficial sources said Wednesday.
“General Soleimani held a meeting with President Putin and high-ranking Russian military and security officials during a three-day visit last week to pursue the issues raised during the (the late November) meeting between Putin and Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei (in Tehran),” unofficial sources told FNA today.
They disclosed that General Soleimani and President Putin also discussed the latest developments in Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Lebanon.
According to the sources, during the meeting between Putin and his high-ranking Generals and General Soleimani, the Russian president called the IRGC Quds Force Commander as “my friend, Qassem”.
Hours after the FNA report, the IRGC denied it, saying such a trip has not taken place, but IRGC Public Relations Chief General Ramezan Sharif told several Iranian news agencies that he would “neither deny nor confirm” the report.
General Soleimani is the head of Iran’s elite Quds force that is the IRGC arms abroad. General Soleimani is the leader of the anti-terrorism war in the region and due to his vitally sensitive job and the grave dangers posed to his life by various Takfiri terrorists and Israeli and American secret services, his exact location is unknown to almost everyone except a very limited number of people. His activities and plans are always conducted in secret, except for very few cases.
A few days after Russian entered the war on terrorism in Syria, several western media outlets claimed that General Soleimani had been in Moscow to encourage Putin to join the war.
General Soleimani arrived in Moscow on July 24 for meetings with Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu and President Putin, the western media reports said in August.
———————————————————————————-
It is only fitting to place Shahid Qassem Soleimani kick-starting the struggle for a multipolar world.
And more.
The Axis of Resistance was his creation, and thanks to his support for the Yemeni Houthis, for the struggle of the Palestinian people, his support for Hezbollah in Lebanon, and his personal command of the war against the taqfiris in Syria/Iraq, the Eurasian heartland has nowadays a semblance of stability for the first time in decades.
Brother Qassem was an extraordinary man living extraordinary times.
Revered as he is around the world, he is also revered in the hearts of those who knew him and worked closely with him.
Putin recently mentioned him in the context of exposing the west for their atrocities,
Putin: “They have no limits. They are not shy about anything. They killed Soleimani, an Iranian general. You can judge Solemani however you want, but this an official in another state. They killed him on a territory of a third country and said, “Yes, we killed him.” What on earth is that? Where are we living?”
————————————————————–
Long live Shahid Qassem Soleimani.
Lone Wolf
Hello Pepe,
Thank you so much for a very timely article on martyr Qassim Soleimani.
I was going to write you regarding the exposition particularly of his role in bringing Russia to Syria. But the Lone Wolf beat me to it. And he has done a comprehensive job at that.
More great work by Pepe!
Chalk this one up too, as just another Trump legacy adding to the mix as the flailing Hegemon self-mutilates itself into economic irrelevance.
The line between the Neolibs and the Neocons is so blurred now that the so-called distinctions are simply another one of the distracting canards that the WEF agenda uses against Mainstreet.
This gives me cause to reflect on the career of Lyndon LaRouche who had both the nouse and vision that could have rescued the US from the financial oligarchy and economic ruin.
He had the blueprint to kick-start the real economy into once again working for Mainstreet, and addressing wealth equality… clearly, under the U$ “two-party” system (sic) he never had a snowball’s chance in hell of ever becoming POTUS.
LLR ran in every election from 1976-2004 as a third-party candidate. Of course, since Andrew Johnson, who followed Lincoln in the late 1860s, no third party had ever got anywhere near the big old house on 1600 Pennsylvania Drive.
Since, and including the JFK tenure, there have been 6 presidents from the blue camp and 6 from the red. Needless to say, the obligatory perpetual state of war accompanies this system. Good luck to anyone trying to work out which party is the least warmongering in the ensuing 60 years.… I would hazard a guess that it is a very close call.
Regarding Brazil, it is obvious that the US is attempting precisely what they inflicted on Argentina and Venezuela when Trump was in power… by blatantly interfering in domestic politics in an attempt to instil shills in power and to enable the conning of these countries back into predatory debt traps.
This article on Argentina is typical of the neocolonial debt spirals and their workings. The attempts at the moment to destabilise Lula’s hold on the Brazilian Presidency are absolutely typical.
… quoted from this excellent article…
“Following the neoliberal disasters of the 1990s, the IMF has tried to rebrand itself as a more collaborative and humanistic institution.
The Covid-19 pandemic seemed to have forced the Fund to soften its infamous obsession with austerity policies and accept the priority of economic growth over debt consolidation.
Whether this was a true change in paradigm or just a marketing campaign is not clear – although Argentines are deeply sceptical.”
https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2022/12/18/argentina-neocolonial-debt-history/
I will answer that question as it is entirely clear to me… the attempt at rebranding is far too late… that ship has already sailed.
The Emporer has no clothes and Mr Trump has helped magnificently in exposing to humanity these very unsavoury home truths.
Go! Donald… enjoy your current hobnobbing in Florida with Tropical Trump. I wonder how this latest move will turn out.
Just me but it’s looking very much like yet another full-on attempt at political Hare-Kari from where I’m standing… admittedly though I’m upside down in the Antipodes.
We shall see!
Col