Ok, this is hardly “new news”. It’s actually pretty old news already. But still, I decided to post this info here simply because I am under the strong feeling that the vast majority of people out there are simply not aware of these facts. So, here we go. Did you know that
I) That in 2006( three years ago!) the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) dropped the famous “pancake theory” about how the WTC buildings fell on 9/11? Here is a quote from their final report:
NIST’s findings do not support the “pancake theory” of collapse, which is premised on a progressive failure of the floor systems in the WTC towers (the composite floor system—that connected the core columns and the perimeter columns—consisted of a grid of steel “trusses” integrated with a concrete slab; see diagram below). Instead, the NIST investigation showed conclusively that the failure of the inwardly bowed perimeter columns initiated collapse and that the occurrence of this inward bowing required the sagging floors to remain connected to the columns and pull the columns inwards. Thus, the floors did not fail progressively to cause a pancaking phenomenon. (source: NIST report FAQ) .
Nevermind the part about “the NIST investigation showed conclusively …“. My point is not to challenge their newest theory, but to point out that the initial “official” theory was quietly dropped and that nobody seems to be aware of that. Ask your friends and colleagues why and how the WTC buildings fell – and I betcha that you will get the “pancake theory”.
II) That NIST also admitted that WTC7 fell in free-fall? Check out this video showing how NIST had to cave in to “truthers” and reluctantly admit that free fall did occur:
So, no pancaking and an officially free falling WTC7…
What to find out more?
Here is a partial list of sources I have found so far:
Videos: (watching these is the best first step)
9/11 Blueprint for Truth (2008 Edition)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4617650616903609314#
Fabled Enemies
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2144933190875239407#
9/11 Attack on the Pentagon
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7134448689829125037#
9/11 Press for Truth
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3865048042993700360#
Improbable Collapse : The Demolition of our Republic
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4026073566596731782#
The 55 articles of the Journal of 9/11 Studies: (second best step)
http://www.journalof911studies.com/
Professional Organizations: (specialized approaches)
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
http://www.ae911truth.org/
Firefighters for 9/11 Truth
http://firefightersfor911truth.org/
Pilots for 9/11 Truth
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/
Journalists & Other Media Professionals for 9/11 Truth
http://mediafor911truth.org/
Lawyers for 9/11 Truth
http://l911t.com/
Journal of 9/11 Studies (Scientists)
http://www.journalof911studies.com/
Patriots Question 9/11
http://patriotsquestion911.com/
Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice
http://stj911.org/
Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth
http://mp911truth.org/
Religious Leaders for 9/11 Truth
http://rl911truth.org/
Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth
http://www.pl911truth.com/
Veterans for 9/11 Truth
http://v911t.org/
Internet sites: (just a few of the hundreds out there)
http://911truth.org/
http://911research.wtc7.net/
http://911blogger.com/
http://911physicstruth.wetpaint.com/
http://forum.911movement.org/
I did also look at the various “debunker” sites but, frankly, their level of argumentation is so clearly dishonest (not to mention the constantly condescending and insulting tone of their arguments) that I pretty soon stopped bothering with them. Still, I will list one here which is particularly liked by debunkers:
http://www.debunking911.com/
Also – check out the “debunking” links offered here:
http://www.debunking911.com/links.htm
But, frankly, if you are interested in the “official’ version you might as well read the NIST report itself.
If you can recommend any further resources, please list them in the comments section.
Many thanks in advance!
The Saker
Don’t you know anyone who questions the official version is a heretic! Truth never fears investigation does it, only lies fear investigation. One of the most “out there” theories I found on tubes of the interweb was that no planes were involved at all but military grade holograms. Another page attempted to show some underwing pods on the jets that were supposed to be remote control pods. Disinfo is planted to spin “truthers” around in circles but even the best propaganda has some truth in it.
@Anonymous: oh sure, there are also theories that nuclear weapons were used in the WTC buidings, and directed energy weapons too. And before long David Icke will say that lizards are involved, together with the Iluminati and little green men from Venus.
Frankly, there is nothing anyone can do about that kind of stuff creeping up. Even more relevantly, there are some very real differences among various “truthers” about what happened with flights 77 and 93 as it appears that the evidence contradicts itself. But that is only a minor annoyance I think. Check out these two brilliant articles about this:
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2009/WhatHitPentagonDrLeggeAug.pdf
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/Vorobej_Obstacles%20to%20Persuasion.pdf
HTH,
The Saker
Thanks for those am copy pasting in browser now.
I don’t know if you knew this one but the FBI refuses to name Bin Laden (Tim Osman on CIA payroll) as a suspect in 9/11.
@anonymous4: FBI refuses to name Bin Laden (Tim Osman on CIA payroll) as a suspect in 9/11.
Yes, and this is cute as this means that the Taliban were supposed to extradite a guy who was not even charged by US authorities (at least not for 9/11).
酒店兼職
酒店
酒店工作
禮服酒店
酒店兼差
酒店打工
酒店經紀
酒店上班
台北酒店
酒店pt
兼差打工
打工兼差
酒店正職 酒店賺錢 酒店喝酒 酒店消費 喝花酒 粉味 喝酒
Very neat writing Wayne Ana but it would be a tedious chore to paste all that into babelfish.
酒店打工
酒店兼職
台北酒店
打工兼差
酒店工作
酒店經紀
禮服酒店
酒店兼差
酒店上班
酒店PT
酒店
酒店喝酒
酒店消費
喝花酒
粉味
喝酒
christian louboutin black pumps?christian louboutin pumps?Red soled shoes Christian Louboutin
Gucci Bags?Chanel Bags Chloe Bags Coach Bags Gucci logo handbags? Louis Vuitton Bags? LV
Louis Vuitton leather handbags?Gucci man’s bags?Gucci sling bags?Miumiu Handbags?D&G Handbags
D&G Bags? Dior Bags Christian Louboutin Shoes Christian Louboutin Evening Christian Louboutin
Pumps
Christian Louboutin Sandals Christian Louboutin Boots Christian Louboutin Wedges Christian
Louboutin Peep toe
Christain Louboutin Slingback Christain Louboutin Mary Janes?Christain Louboutin Louboutin Shoes?
YSL
Classic Christian Louboutin?New Style Christian Louboutin?Christian Louboutin Boots?Manolo
Blahnik?Jimmy Choo
Yves Saint Lauret?Nicholas kirkwood?Alexander McQueen?Chanel?Gucci shoes?UGG Bailey Button?UGG
Classic Metallic5812
? UGG Classic Tall 5815?UGG Ultra Tall 5245?UGG Classic Mini 5854?UGG Classic Cardy 5819 UGG
Classic Short 5825?
UGG Nightfall 5359?UGG Ultra Short 5225?UGG Sundance II 5325? Ugg Women’s Tasmina Sandals?UGG
Classic Tall Romantic Flower?
UGG Kids?UGG Lucky Brand Slipper?ugg bags?UGG Sundance Limited Edition Louboutin Boots?Louboutin
Evening?
Louboutin Sandals?Louboutin Slingback?Louboutin?Louboutin Mary Janes Louboutin?How Can Buy
Louboutin Shoes
Louis Vuitton Bags 08- Monogram watercolor Antigua Cherry Blossom Cruise Collection Damier Azur
Damier Canvas City Bags Clutch Bags Luggage Wallets Damier Geant Canvas Dentelle & Riveti
Epi Leather City Bags Wallets LV Cup Mahina Handbags wallets Monogram Canvas Agendas City Bags
Clutch Bags Luggage Pet Carriers Small Leather Goods Monogram Denim City bags
Welcome to the shop:
http://www.buylouboutin.com/
http://www.yitingbuy.com/
http://www.bestlouisvuitton.com/
http://www.discount-
christianlouboutin.com/
Sorry Bo we can’t afford those items anymore we shipped all our manufacturing to China and decided democracy was about the choice between McDonalds and Burger King. Zimbabwe third world laughing stock here we come!