Well I don’t think the cited reasons are enough to put me off having a look at RI. I understand it ain’t no Saker and it isn’t the review or the journal or dispatch or Alabama or Voltaire or RT or Tass or Sputnik or debka or or or or the myriad other sites I chew through BUT it does give me stories and authors I would find it difficult to get exposure to despite my far more than anyone else I know readings. So the guy is cutting a path unsettling…as a angle hungry observer and thinker I couldn’t give a rats arse for the complaint…I want to consume information and RI does actually provide it.
Same sort of thing here, the only reason why I looked at it was to see what Saker or Mercouris posted there. Now that Saker is out, I have half as many good reasons to browse to it.
Well I don’t think the cited reasons are enough to put me off having a look at RI. I understand it ain’t no Saker and it isn’t the review or the journal or dispatch or Alabama or Voltaire or RT or Tass or Sputnik or debka or or or or the myriad other sites I chew through BUT it does give me stories and authors I would find it difficult to get exposure to despite my far more than anyone else I know readings. So the guy is cutting a path unsettling…as a angle hungry observer and thinker I couldn’t give a rats arse for the complaint…I want to consume information and RI does actually provide it.
Same sort of thing here, the only reason why I looked at it was to see what Saker or Mercouris posted there. Now that Saker is out, I have half as many good reasons to browse to it.