If you are having trouble viewing this video, go to the Youtube version at https://www.youtube.com/user/crimeanfront/videos
Saker Message:
If you are having trouble viewing this video, go to the Youtube version at https://www.youtube.com/user/crimeanfront/videos
Rasfanjani’s got it all wrong. The Outlaw Empire’s “approach” was to invade Syria with its terrorist proxies when its Color Revolution to oust Assad failed. That most decidedly is not the Russian “approach. Perhaps he’d rather Russia didn’t do anything.
In one sentence why Iran must be protected “Protecting Syria is the first line of defense, because all roads to invading Iran and ending the threat to the Petrodollar run through Syria. And America’s worst nightmare, a joint Middle Eastern military par”
Please, do read the whole article: http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2015/09/25/china-joining-russia-in-syria-while-germany-prepares-to-leave-nato-in-advance-of-world-war-iii/
And if I may share this one as well: http://essential-intelligence-network.blogspot.se/2015/09/the-old-world-coalition-against-isis.html
Timely this article about the active scheming of the same bunch, this in 2010 with the evil elf & camoron trying to keep alive Sykes-Picot of a century ago.
Nicolas Sarkozy and David Cameron sign the Lancaster House Agreement. This document is a duplicate, one century later, of the entente cordiale concluded by the Sykes-Picot Agreements.
France is today the main international power which is calling for the overthrow of the Syrian Arab Republic. While the White House and the Kremlin are secretly negotiating the most efficient way of getting rid of the jihadists, Paris persists in accusing the « Bachar régime » (sic) of having created Daesh, and declaring that after having eliminated the Islamic Emirate, it will be necessary to overthrow « the Alawite dictatorship » (re-sic). France is publicly supported by Turkey and Saudi Arabia, and also, secretly, by Israel.
OCT 12
http://www.voltairenet.org/article189006.html
Rusdia must concentrate on winning and appear to be einning the Syrian war. Then everything will change for better.
Any other effort is wastage of time. No diplomacy except as a means to win militarily. Powerflows from the barrel of gun.as does petrodollar. So to kill petro dillarrussia must win syrian war.
Putin on ISIS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ykb5sxTl1Rw
I thought readers here might find the following interesting: a reality check for former US ambassador to Syria, Robert Ford (the leader of the so-called peaceful wahaabist syrian protesters):
I’m supplying links to a picture of the honorable ambassador as he examines his handiwork (at a massacre site of dismembered Syrian soldiers) and a link to the main article. Here’s a snippit of the photo-caption:
Our[The Syrian] government organized [a] tour to a mass grave of syrian soldiers committed by foriegn backed rebels,Uighur in Jisr Al Shugour with other foriegn diplomats, among those was the USA former ambassador in Syria, the head of protesters movement at that time
Here’s a picture of Mr. Ford covering his nose (to block the stench of the rotting corpses of his victims) as the Syrian government offered him an official tour of a massacre site in Jisr as-Shugour. I’m sure Amb Ford is proud of his support for the “Moderate” terrorists that carried out this massacre.
Here’s the link to the pic: https://syrianaafrona.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/ford.jpg
Here’s the link to the article:
https://syrianaafrona.wordpress.com/2015/09/12/settlers-in-syriauighurs-turkestan-and-displacement-of-syrianssyria-to-where/
Espelho
Correct that Syria was to be the weak link to getting into Iran.
Both listed among the 7 countries the neocons bragged right after 2001 911 they would invade & regime change within 5 years (mad General Clark’s 2007 speech)!
http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13940723000692
OCT 15
TEHRAN (FNA)- A senior Iranian lawmaker announced that Tehran will consider sending troops to Syria upon Damascus request.
Speaking in the Syrian capital Damascus, Chairman of the Iranian parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission Alaeddin Boroujerdi said any such a request will be discussed at the Iranian parliament.
He added that the Syrian government should be part of any plan to end the conflict ravaging the country, reaffirming Iran’s support for Syria in its fight against terrorist groups.
Sorry forgot to include a video clip of Western and Turkish sponsored “moderate” Uighur terrorists and their young children settling in for “moderate” Jihad in the Syrian country side. (John McCain’s and that pigophile David Cameron’s idea of a moderate Syrian rebel is one who shoots his unarmed and tied up victims in the head instead of beheading them with a knife).
Here’s the vid: you don’t need to understand Arabic to witness the video evidence of the Uighurs in Syria (no question that these guys are part of the stable of of useful Islamist idiots that British intelligence agencies use to destabilize China and now, Syria).
https://youtu.be/TPlUCyz9-u8
I don’t know how much trust one could place in any “DEBKAfile” reports, but this one is uplifting:
Israel perturbed by the arrival of 3,000 Iranian troops in Syria with 2,000 Cubans
http://www.debka.com/article/24950/Israel-perturbed-by-the-arrival-of-3-000-Iranian-troops-in-Syria-with-2-000-Cubans
I doubt the Cuban involvement (I’d like that,but doubt it). We would hear the US “squealing” about it if it was true.
“I don’t know how much trust one could place in any “DEBKAfile” reports, but this one is uplifting:”
You cannot trust ANYTHING that comes from the Mossad sponsored DEBKAfile.I’m just totally amazed that people would even post it’s crap on this site.
FWIW
A very neat brief informative video.
Rafsanjani is the leader of Iranian 5th column … Since decades he and his team has been conspiring against Iranian peoples’ interest – to enhance his family business and wealth and power…
I wonder how the 5th columns flourish in every country (in understanding with USA/NATO based AngloZionists) – I wonder why they are not put into trial by the peoples’ of those countries ?
There was quite the squabble on ‘Crosstalk:Blaming Russia’ between Peter Lavelle and Sharif Nashashibi of Arab Media Watch (Wiki: “a London-based media watchdog organisation with the stated aim of working toward objective British media coverage of the Arab world)
The Arab Media Watch website just seem to consist of a single page of sponsored listing links with no direct connection to Arab Media Watch -whatever that really is. The video was earlier in October when I was away and for a short blissful time had no media access. Peter Lavelle may have his faults but this Sharif seems a prickly, scrappy arrogant character with ideas on Syria at least that most on here would probably disagree with.
I had never heard of him Does anybody know what he is all about?
RT.com Crosstalk link: https://youtu.be/zLLBxDs-aAg
https://www.rt.com/shows/crosstalk/317846-syria-civil-war-russia/
@SanctuaryOne
A brief scan of this article by SN for Gulf News will tell you all you need to know:
http://m.gulfnews.com/opinion/the-arab-spring-and-waning-us-influence-1.1244155
He poses as ‘objective’ but he is clearly on the same page as MSM. A form of ‘controlled opposition’ and probably funded by the usual suspects. (Murdoch?)
I hope Lavelle doesn’t bother with him again. Waste of time.
Thanks; I see what you mean -and it is ironic that, as described in the book ‘Muslims of Metropolis’, Sharif’s self-perceived role was to hold British media to task for inaccuracies and bias.
well, that may be South Front – that its still a question whether Iran supports Russian Air Mission in Syria. But if you listen to Hezbollah, who loves Iran, it must be that Iran fully supports Russia.
Iran doesn’t wear its heart on its sleeve. Its quiet and keeps to itself, but I’m sure that all Iranian people support the destruction of ISIL>
http://www.almasdarnews.com/article/u-s-backed-rebel-alliance-reportedly-loses-a-member-jund-al-aqsa-protests-fight-against-isis/
“Jund Al-Aqsa (offshoot of Jabhat Al-Nusra) has pulled out of Jaysh Al-Fateh in protest of the coalition’s recent statements that included their willingness to fight the Islamic State of Iraq and Al-Sham (ISIS).”
So far about this coalition fighting IS: They were until “recently” not even willing to fight IS, and already the pure statement that they are now willing to fight it (instead of actually fighting it) leads to a breakdown of this coalition.