By Ramin Mazaheri for The Saker Blog
Ramin Mazaheri is the chief correspondent in Paris for Press TV and has lived in France since 2009. He has been a daily newspaper reporter in the US, and has reported from Iran, Cuba, Egypt, Tunisia, South Korea and elsewhere. He is the author of the books ‘I’ll Ruin Everything You Are: Ending Western Propaganda on Red China’ and the upcoming ‘Socialism’s Ignored Success: Iranian Islamic Socialism’.
“We designed this system for the younger generations, those who will have to face professional mobility, geographical mobility and herky-jerky careers.”
- French Prime Minister Edouard Philippe at the unveiling of what aims to be the world’s first one-size-fits-all pension system, 11 December 2019
“Like poor farmers all over China, they always had to look for supplementary employment, and their odd-jobbing during busy seasons was at the cost of their own crops. The 1942 survey team gave the example of a Suide county village in which 31 percent of all poor famers hired themselves out at one time or another to other farmers each year, and another 31 percent hired out full time.”
– From the book Late Victorian Holocausts, by Mike Davis, describing the situation of pre-revolutionary China
Macron and the globalist 1% would be thrilled if they could achieve such astronomical part-time figures.
France would not be more than a week into a huge general strike if their “uppity” workers were reduced to begging for part-time work – like in the Anglo-Saxon world – instead of mostly working on long-term contracts.
The “Uberization” of the work force is an atrocious Western concoction, but it’s not historically new. However, making your pension based on a lifetime of odd-jobbing is definitely unprecedented.
The enormous difference between France and pre-revolutionary China is that nobody is occupying France militarily, controlling their foreign trade, making their leaders puppets who cannot properly administer a country, and nor is anyone forcing in tons of drugs (the infamous “Opium Wars”). France is Uberizing (or Americanizing) their economy from the cradle to the grave amid record corporate profits and zero foreign sanctions.
Odd-jobbing as a way of life only worked temporarily in China – a popular revolution was able to restore sovereignty in 1949, and now China is the economic envy of the world – but that’s not the case for many Western nations, sadly.
Macron wants to turn France into the US, but the French prefer Asia’s moral governance
Is France China? No, France is more like the US. A tough assessment, but it certainly will be even truer if their general strike fails to stop Macron’s radical pension “reform”.
Quite simply: All workers cannot be united… under a single pension system, that is. Somebody starting work at 18 and working in the cold and heat cannot be compared with a PhD graduate who didn’t start his or her cushy office job until 30. So, only the dense and naive still push this idea.
But the dense and naive are actually running France’s semi-dictatorial executive branch and its totally aristocratic/bourgeois legislative branch!
There is much to write about France’s radical (in a reactionary, not a leftist/progressive sense) pension system, unveiled yesterday, but what we should not do is believe that it is actually new.
Return to those two quotes, but put aside the modern Western propaganda fomenting prejudice against rural people, and their identity politics-inspired idea that all workers are not fundamentally similar – the Uber model of work is the same as perpetual, precarious, pension-less “odd-jobbing”. What pre-progressive China had was an “Uberized” economy and… it was terrible.
It should not be surprising that Uber’s CEO, Dara Khosrowshahi, is an anti-revolution Iranian. Reactionary exiles – from the revolutions in Russia, Cuba, etc. – are the persons whom the West likes to elevate because they are often even more reactionary than what can be found inside the West: They are violently, personally at (counter-) war with the progressive politics which link any revolution since 1917.
The unsaid reality in the Western mainstream media’s adoring coverage of Uber is this: nobody actually wants to be an Uber driver. They only do it because their governments fail to provide them with full time work.
This reality remains unsaid because the West, capitalism, and especially the adherents of the neoliberal/free market form of capitalism simply hate government assistance for the poor/middle classes, including things like decent pensions even in rich countries.
Many people reading this feel the same way: they believe that people only want a “handout” and that, morally, such a worldview deserves only punishment. Their view is the exact same as that in the West when they imposed the era of the developing world’s “Great Leap Backward”, the Late Victorian era.
Davis’ book is so necessary because he showed the devastating true early years of free market/neoliberal capitalism – forced, organised, genocidal (thus he uses the term “holocaust”, like the German slaughter of the Jews) famine and poverty because the free market says so. This period of Western history is absolutely never discussed; conversely, the bumpy early years of countries which had popular revolutions in the 20th century are endlessly criticised, even though such nations had such far, far more noble goals and such enormous foreign obstacles thrown up.
Unlike China’s Great Leap Forward, which produced infrastructure and irrigation systems which are still in use today, the “Belle Epoque” or “Gilded Age” of Western colonialism (1865-1914) purposely neglected peasant infrastructure and irrigation systems (something never done by any government in the pre-colonial history of India or China, for example) to create this “Uberized”, desperately odd-jobbing work force at the mercy of the boss, of the usurer, of the foreign capitalist, of the unholy “free market”.
France’s pension rollback must be seen as part a historical pattern, and not in isolation.
Their current general strike is a response to the austerity project of that “neoliberal empire”, the European Union. The EU is finally doing to Europe what Europeans did to the rest of the world for two centuries: purposely ruining and dismantling what took so long to build.
A capitalist government, especially a Western individualist one, does NOT want worker stability because their happiness necessarily comes at the expense of the profits and control of the 1%. It’s as true in the Uber Era as it was in the Victorian Era.
No public jobs, no public pension, no public anything – only private domination
Who is leading the general strike in France? Public sector workers.
Why not private sector workers? Because private workers can be far more easily fired, of course, and for things like going on strike for one month. It should be easy to understand why Western, free-market, neoliberal, 1%-driven dogma demands the end of the public sector.
But we must realise that free-marketeers have always viewed any government expenditure – jobs, services, pension – as wasteful, inefficient, incompetent and even morally repugnant, even when the only alternative was death.
What they fail to realise is that there are only two choices: give a citizen a government job and get some societal benefit, or give them a dole and get no societal benefit except avoiding famine.
Free-marketers, however, demand a third option: collect no tax revenue, and give them nothing so the rich can keep every penny there is. This was the exact same view during the Third World-holocaust beginnings of Western-style capitalism. Here is Davis on the colonial government’s response to one of the many famines in British India (FYI: 120 years of British rule – 31 famines. The previous 2,000 years of Indian rule – 17 famines):
“(The Earl of Lytton, Viceroy of India 1876-1880) promptly ordered his district officers and engineers to ‘discourage relief works in every possible way … Mere distress is not a sufficient reason for opening a relief work.’ The point was to force the peasants to give money to the government, not the other way around.”
The Eurozone is not facing famine, but their Lost Decade of economic growth has created poverty not seen since the immediate postwar period. Macron’s pension plan is the same moral response as Lytton’s: the point is to give money to the 1%, not for the 1% to “waste” money on old people.
The French want minor adjustments to their current pension model – Macron wants to throw it out entirely. We can easily picture him saying “Mere distress is not a sufficient reason for giving old people good pensions.”
Things have not changed dramatically in Western economic culture since 1865. Lytton was so popular that he is one of the few British people to ever be given a state funeral in France; Macron is feted like a conquering god in the Anglophone world. The Netherlands’ cultuurstelsel system of colonisation was modelled on British India, and they are Germany’s “silent partner” in forcing austerity on weaker Eurozone nations.
The links are endless, and they are all built around exploiting the average person whether young or old because Western culture is so against anything but aristocratic liberal democracy. This is not a model accepted by Iran, China and perhaps the “silent majority” of the world’s nations.
Anyone who cannot see the link between imperialist-dominated China, at the mercy of the world’s largest-ever drug traffickers (the UK opium dealers), and the Uber model either lacks intellectual flexibility due to dogmatic support of falsely-moralist free market ideology or they incorrectly believe that human beings have changed immeasurably in the past 150+ years.
The slogan of France’s general strike has become, “A few weeks of chaos or a lifetime misery?” It’s not very imbued with revolutionary spirit – economics is grim and emotionless business in the West – but it is common sense.
However, common sense and common humanity have often been more than the West’s individualist-worshipping 1% has been able to muster for a couple centuries.
“link between imperialist-dominated China, at the mercy of the world’s largest-ever drug traffickers (the UK opium dealers), and the Uber model”
…
No place in the USA more than Portland(oregon) and maybe Seattle/San-Francisco has embraced the ‘uber model’ and lifestyle.
But what is most telling is that black gangs have openly taken over the mcDonalds and sell heroin( opium, fenytal,..), prostitute white girls, and emasculated little ‘uber boyz’ are the best customer so they can ‘take away the pain of life’
This is all 100% pure ANZ plan, they did it to Africa, they did it to the slaves in the US colony, they did it south-america, and carribean, and now they’re doing to to EU&USA flooding drugs, and telling the police to stand down, and letting the black gangs ( & mexican gangs ) who have taken over the prison systems to sell drugs to the ‘millenials’, so how long will that last, and who will stand up? Given that ma&pa are fat in battery wheel chairs patrolling the ‘walmart’ for blue-light specials.
Even the language makes it hopeless to stand-up, merely suggesting that ‘black gangs’ are selling drugs would be ‘racist’, in many places the mexican-gangs ( almost always central america – Guatemalans/hondurans ) have taken over
There is an endgame here for anybody that really wants to know, Sheldon Adelson the owner of Trump and the owner of the world largest casinos and whore houses all over the earth including ASIA ( think macau ) has openly said he wants to turn the USA into one big whorehouse, essentially a place where rich arab/asian tourists can have sex with white minors, .. so there is an end-game here, if your care to know;
The big problem right now is just the depopulation problem, and they’re working on that as quick as they can, and Trump’s wall is to keep the ‘sex-slaves’ in the rape-prison.
Also talking about ‘opium’ think East India Company, the guys who ran it, everywhere they went Shanghai, HongKong, Taiwan, Macao, Nanjing, they turned into whore-houses, the biggest users of opium were the women, and they had no choice but to sell their bodies to buy food to feed their children, so none of this is new, its just that most people don’t know the history.
…
I think the reason that the ANZ has the police standing down, is that know the whtie ‘fear’ the mexican(brown) & black gangs, thus in the open-prison model, the gangs will be the ‘cops’, the ANZ can take out gangs that get out of control, any time just like they do in Afghan, or Columbia, anywhere the CIA runs the drug-manufacturing and distribution system.
Just like the “GREEN ZONE” in Afghan or Iraq, all these places they call them “EMBASSYS” or super citys, but they’re all just cover for child-prostitution
…
So what does this have to do with the “UBER Model”, well same as its always been for the feral city-rats, they sell their body’s for $5 a pop for drugs, and go from high to high.
Macron is a globalist whore, but, the French won’t go for his ideas. The French smelled Macron when he started to show his true colours. Even the founder of Uber cashed out as he found out the limits of uberizing tax industries globally. Macron will cut his losses and scamper as well into the oblivion he so richly deserves, with his grandmother.
How can an article about France’s pension system be complete without mentioning that taxes in France are astronomical?
My payslip had around 7 different deductions. I am now of pension age but no longer living in France. It would cost me 20,000+ Euros to get a lawyer to stake my claim to a pension.
The other thing missing in the article is the fact that the French State is more than half the economy. It is a Socialist country on steroids. It is only a matter of time before they cease to be able to borrow. What they have already borrowed will never be repaid.
In 2020, there will be a sovereign debt crisis. France will be near the front of the queue. So much for the billions in negative interest rates. The value of these “investments” will plummet. Guaranteed.
‘…anyone forcing in tons of drugs (the infamous “Opium Wars”)… ‘
The opium smugglers were damaging Indian agriculture so the British approached the Chinese Imperial government to collaborate on stamping them out, only to be informed that the smugglers were in fact partnered with the Chinese government and therefore no interference with the opium trade would be tolerated.
History is not a simple affair, with clear-cut ‘goodies and baddies’, as the author appears to suggest.
The opium smugglers were damaging Indian agriculture so the British approached the Chinese Imperial government to collaborate on stamping them out, only to be informed that the smugglers were in fact partnered with the Chinese government and therefore no interference with the opium trade would be tolerated.
Nonsense. The Chinese government tried to end the opium traffic: “An edict from the Daoguang Emperor followed on 18 March [1838], emphasising the serious penalties for opium smuggling that would now apply.”
In fact, Commissioner Lin Zexu tried to destroy imported opium:
Of course, the British reacted to this threat to their profitable narcotics trade by starting the First Opium War.
The Imperial Customs service were the direct partners of Jardines and the other companies. Do you really think that the European shippers distributed the opium themselves throughout China? Of course not, they worked hand-in-glove with the Chinese authorities. I have no objection to national mythologies as long as the underlying facts are not obscured. Similarly, Kunta Kinte was not netted on a beach by Europeans, he would have been sold into slavery by his own tribal chief. It is a complicated, uncomfortable reality, but that is history, if you prefer instead to base your understanding on simplistic made-up narratives then that’s your choice..
Hand in glove sure… one of this gloves had a gun, but no matter, eh? Bosh….
The opium pipe symbolised a gentleman of leisure in ancient China, so unfortunately there was an aspirational element when opium was first imported in bulk by European smugglers.
What is blatant nonsense, or ‘bosh’, is the idea that half a dozen Scotsmen forced millions of Chinese people to buy opium at gunpoint.
Hakduk, an aspirational element to being addicted to drugs?
You really have no idea what you are talking about, nor when it comes to the UK’s drug-running history.
Opium smoking was associated with great wealth in ancient China (before the market was flooded by European importers). The opium pipe was a well known status symbol so there certainly was an aspirational element when this bulk importation first began. This is why it quickly became a national epidemic.
Addiction to opium actually takes quite a bit of time, unlike refined opiates. The deleterious effects are also spread out over a longer period, so some opium users manage to survive decades of addiction (which almost never happens with heroin).
Perhaps at one time, opium smoking was legal. At one time. Then it definitely was illegal. Did you miss the fact that Commissioner Lin’s confiscation of opium had the emperor’s backing?
Ramin Mazaheri wrote:
“The Netherlands’ cultuurstelsel system of colonisation was modelled on British India, and they are Germany’s “silent partner” in forcing austerity on weaker Eurozone nations.”
I respond:
Fascinating. News about the Netherland elites’ collaboration with the German elites is almost impossible to find. How does the Netherlands benefit? What was it promised?
By the way, if German banks own most of French foreign debt, then how do the German elites expect to be repaid?
OP alludes to the “Chinese Model” could be implemented in France, where a ‘good gov’ does what’s best for the people, like rising a billion people out of poverty into middle class in 30 years, …
But without a ‘homogeneous society’ ala japan china, or any where in asia, how could this be in EU? The reason Asia ‘works’ is that there are only Asians, they’re the majority in every asian city in Asia, well except Singapore, which is a jewel, and a perfect example, but again that model only works because of the ‘stick’ a stick that could never be wielded in France.
Also some 4,000+ year or more Confuscian history of China, having benevolent rulers, but in the West its always been the master/slave (Jew/Goy) model of political science
Thus its 100% impossible to implement the ‘asia model’ in France, all they can do is kick the can, and keep turning over new ANZ leadership.
All pensions are KAPUT this is a known-known, even in ASIA a pension is having ‘children to take care of you when your old”, the entire problem is that the ANZ model of pay in now, get back later was a PONZI in every western country owned by the ANZ
Your arguments are clear – but they presume the inevitability of large oligarchical states – be they socialist/fascist – however the alternative no one seems to want to look at is the populist/libertarian decentralized model.
Jobs are fine – if (and only if) they could be clear of and disconnected from – the states and/or huge corporate entities (who are its partners in reality) – and where people dared actually change the (form of) government w/o fear of putting their jobs & pensions at risk.
It is fairly easy to see that the state-centric passivation[sic] (to buy social peace) of many EUSSR countries – with their wonderful benefits, etc. (starting with the Marshall plan!), was merely a milestone en route to a global government. I hope the French (and EUSSR) will wake up and see through their oligarchical government and its confetti money before they are subjected to yet more years of faux regimes driven by banksters and staffed by the standard French nomenklatura of “mercedes socialists”.
https://www.activistpost.com/2019/12/candles-in-the-dark-with-larken-rose.html
as Goethe said:
None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.