by Peter Koenig
“Hacking” to influence election results? Ridiculous! That may have been a thing of the past. Or not even. It’s an evil invention of the evil losers of the evil Hillary camp, supported by a criminal departing President Obama, who will be leaving office, of course, not with a bang, not even with a whimper, but with a disgrace for his nation and for the truth loving people all around the world. What a legacy the first ‘black’ US President leaves behind – as an assassin by thousands of indiscriminate and illegal drone killings, by starting 5 new wars, being currently involved in seven unjustified and illegal armed conflicts around the globe, killing millions of people and, finally, as a miserable liar.
Already back in August 2016, NSA whistleblower William Binney stated on Aaron Klein Investigative Radio that “the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) server was not hacked by Russia, but by a disgruntled US intelligence worker.” Binney went on to proclaim that “the NSA has all of Clinton’s deleted emails, and the FBI could gain access to them if they so wished.” He concluded that there was no need for Trump to ask the Russians for the emails, he could just ask the FBI or NSA to hand them over.
So, one of President Obama’s last deeds in this illustrious office of the Presidency of the United States, is lying to the American people and lying to the world. – Bravo!
——–
The truth behind Donald Trump’s ‘surprise’ election may lay somewhere else. It’s called Psychometrics, a method based on massive behavioral data collection of people to be targeted by propaganda, or more accurately expressed by mind manipulation. A 34-year old Polish researcher at the University of Cambridge, Michal Kosinski, is the chief architect of this new refined brainwashing technology which is being marketed, sold and applied by a small London-based data analysis firm, called ‘Cambridge Analytica’.
The research firm first worked for Republican Presidential Candidate Ted Cruz, U.S. Senator from Texas, who was little known by most Americans. Cambridge Analytica increased his popularity to 40%, but not enough to win the Republican nomination. The data analysis firm was then hired by Trump’s campaign team – successfully as it appears. In this 11-minute YouTube, Alexander Nix, CEO of Cambridge Analytica, explains the method on the case of Ted Cruz.
As reported by the Swiss newspaper, ‘Tagesanzeiger’ (TA), Psychometrics, or Psychographics, as such is not new. It was developed in the 1980, as a scientific tool to help determine people’s personalities. Psychologists concluded that every trait of a person’s character can be categorized into five personality dimensions. The system is called OCEAN, for Openness, Consciousness, level of Extraversion, Amicability (compatibility) and Neuroticism.
Kosinski claims that based on about 70 Facebook-Likes, he can determine with 95% accuracy whether a person is black or white, with 88% whether he / she is homosexual and with 85% whether he /she is a Democrat or Republican. With 150 ‘Likes’ he knows a person better than his / her parents, and with 300, better than his / her partner. These are impressive claims. But Are they correct? Many critics dispute them, mainly arguing there is no proof that targeted people (i) actually do vote, and (ii) that they vote according to their profile. In any case, it would be difficult to verify to what extent Cambridge Analytica helped Donald Trump to win the elections. Cambridge Analytica also claims credit for the BREXIT vote.
Facebook entries are not the only input to “Big Data”. In addition to tens of thousands of ‘likes’ collected, data on peoples’ google browsing, eating and consumer habits, what cosmetics and rock bands they like, whether they are drug, cigarettes and / or alcohol addicts, or just users, what type of alcohol, brand or type of car they prefer, their banking customs, even the speed with which they remove their cell phone from their pockets when it rings – and-so-on – are also entered into “Big Data”. We are indeed living in the age of no holds barred as far as disrespect for privacy and universal data collection is concerned. As long as we let it happen, it will only get worse.
Hundreds of thousands of people are literally being ‘profiled’ for targeted and personalized propaganda messages to convince segments of people and individuals of think-alikes to vote for or against a candidate. The TA concludes, that’s why Trump’s campaign messages were often contradictory and confusing, difficult to establish a clear picture of where he really stands. This is still the case today.
According to Kosinski, in the ‘olden days’, social research firms had to get people filling-in cumbersome questionnaires, based on demographics. Today this approach is outdated. We have internet and Facebook. Not all women, blacks, Hispanics, gays, straights – vote alike. This false assumption was still used by Hillary’s campaign and demonstrated to be deceptive. Even though Hillary had about 2.7 million more popular votes, she lost the election by electorates. Cambridge Analytica worked on swing states. Within these States, they targeted specifically the ‘vulnerable’ or undecided, or motivated those with no intention to vote to get off their butts and cast their vote for Trump, or against Hillary, depending on their profile.
For example, Haitians in Florida, who had no intention to vote, but would have leaned Democratic, i.e. for Hillary, were targeted with propaganda describing the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and how the Clintons ruined Haiti’s economy. So – they went to vote for Trump as an anti-Clinton vote. At least this was the plan and apparently, it worked in sufficient cases to be effective.
Although we will never know for sure to what extent Cambridge Analytica has contributed to Trump’s election win, we can be certain that the method, inexpensive as compared to demographic profiling, will be used masively in the future, most certainly in the upcoming elections in France and the Netherlands (Spring 2017) and Germany (Fall 2017).
Thanks goodness for President Putin (I must have said this many times before) to give Mr. Obama and all the people around him, a lesson on how to behave like a statesman and not like a losing looney what he is. President Putin did not retaliate Obama’s flagrant lie-based expelling of 35 Russian diplomats with families just before New Year’s Eve, in full preparation of year-end festivities. Instead he invited US diplomats in Moscow and their kids to celebrate the year-end festivities with their Russian colleagues. Obama’s act of cowardice was framed as ‘sanction’ for ‘Russian interference in US elections’ – a blatant lie. Mr. Obama, the master puppet of the deep state that pulls the strings on his lips and mind – he, (nominally) President Obama, knows it’s a sham.
Peter Koenig is an economist and geopolitical analyst. He is also a former World Bank staff and worked extensively around the world in the fields of environment and water resources. He writes regularly for Global Research, ICH, RT, Sputnik, PressTV, The 4th Media, TeleSUR, TruePublica, The Vineyard of The Saker Blog, and other internet sites. He is the author of Implosion – An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and Corporate Greed – fiction based on facts and on 30 years of World Bank experience around the globe. He is also a co-author of The World Order and Revolution! – Essays from the Resistance.
My comment won’t mean very much, because I don’t do the social media sites, though I do occasionally comment online when the articles or other comments stir a response. At any rate, for this reason the analysis of the claim to have swayed electoral predilections towards this or that candidate don’t convince me.
I suspect that any candidate on the Democratic side of the contest would have had great difficulty overcoming the legacy of Obama, but then I was flabbergasted that he even won a second term. Perhaps I am wrong. I would like to think I am not, but I am a dreamer, as a dear uncle once called me.
I think back to what I think was a vaguely similar time for Russia, and that was the decay of the national consciousness (particularly for the youth) as Americanisms took over there when communism lost power. We in the US haven’t quite tipped over into the hopelessness that became the legacy of that period as I understand it, but I think it may be coming. We may well have a softer landing than Russia did; because Russia really has had to pull itself up by its own bootstraps. There was no one except history itself to teach them what to do – no big corporate media blitz as described above, except the hollywoodisms that were so foreign to what Russia really is.
Keep on calling me a dreamer, but I think the US populace already is beginning to forswear such boastful claims of influence. We are sick of the glitz – Hillary tried to ride in on it and we turned our backs. We probably need some hard times now.
Good.
“A 34-year old Polish researcher at the University of Cambridge, Michal Kosinski, is the chief architect of this new refined brainwashing technology which is being marketed, sold and applied by a small London-based data analysis firm, called ‘Cambridge Analytica’.”
That’s interesting. I noticed there was a lot of playing to specific audiences in trump’s campaign, figured it was the work of his PR guys. Now we have athe name of the firm behind the PR talk.
Tomorrow trump will get a personal showing of the zapruder film with the appropriate before and after the showing commentary. How he reacts publicly after will be important.
Hyped Up Senate Hearing on Russian ‘Hacking’ Ends Up Being a Flop
https://sputniknews.com/us/201701051049303837-senate-hearing-russian-hacking-flop/
“No evidence was presented during the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Thursday to support allegations that Russia hacked the US Presidential election, despite multiple calls by Republican Senator Lindsey Graham for the nation to “throw rocks” at the Kremlin.”
But the aipac trough feeders spewed their horse manure regardless.
Nearly Half of Grizzly Steppe’s ‘Russian Hacking’ IP Addresses Prove Nothing
https://sputniknews.com/military/201701051049274027-grizzly-steppe-ip-addresses-proof/
“The US intelligence community’s Grizzly Steppe report claims that 876 unique IP addresses were used to infiltrate the Democratic National Committee and John Podesta’s email accounts. But it turns out that 42 percent of those IPs are, or were, simply part of Tor’s evolving network of exit nodes, a new analysis has revealed.
A whopping 367 of the IPs are, or were, simply Tor exit nodes, according to a recent analysis by The Intercept’s Micah Lee. This means anyone using a Tor web browser, whether in Ireland, Nigeria, Alaska, or mom’s basement in Ohio, could leave an IP trace that would apparently render them as those crème de la crème Russian computer hackers, according to the logic of the US intelligence community’s report.”
TOR is an american tool, u.s. spooks can source and decrypt any user of it. No Russian intelligence operative would use that rubbish.
Anti-Logic: FBI Blind To DNC Servers Before Accusing Russia of Cyberattack
https://sputniknews.com/military/201701061049308403-anti-logic-fbi-dnc-servers/
“Six months after the FBI began accusing Russia of a cyber breach, the agency still has not requested access to hacked Democratic National Committee servers, according to a DNC spokesman.
Further, an intelligence official told BuzzFeed News that no representative of the vast network of US intelligence services has conducted any form of original forensic analysis of those servers. Nevertheless, President Obama ordered the expulsion of almost three-dozen Russian diplomats, adding to his tarnished reputation as “deporter in chief.”
Apparently these agencies base their accusations upon “evidence” acquired through telepathy.
Sputnik, RT – Grave Concern of Infamous Liar James Clapper
https://sputniknews.com/military/201701051049303062-sputnik-rt-liar-james-clapper/
Clapper, it is remembered, is best known to the public as the person who lied to Congress about US spying activities. On March 12, 2013, during a United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence hearing, Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) asked him whether the NSA “collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?” Clapper responded: “No, Sir.”
The answer seemed to make Senator Wyden so uncomfortable that he repeated the question: “It does not?”
This time Director Clapper responded “Not wittingly. There are cases where they could inadvertently perhaps collect, but not wittingly.”
However, fairly soon it was revealed that NSA collected dragnet data of American phone records, thanks to whistleblower Edward Snowden. The NSA program aggregates metadata from millions of law-abiding Americans in collusion with telecom giants, who Americans pay every month for the supposed privilege of using cellphones. Literally, Americans spend money to get spied on by their own government. Those, who remember Clapper’s testimony demand that he be held accountable for lying to Congress, a felony. The Director of National Intelligence first claimed that he “misunderstood” the question and that he had simply “forgotten” the relevant section of the Patriot Act covering these programs. However, later he was forced to formally apologize to Congress and admit that his statement was the “least untruthful answer” he could give to protect secretive spying programs that target US citizens.”
The clap even looks the corrupt (gay) edgar hoover role he plays.
Your aipac controlled dollars at work in your congress, america.
‘Surreal echo chamber’: Watch ‘Russia hacked US’ narrative challenged in RT debate
https://www.rt.com/news/372788-russia-hacking-us-rt-debate/
“Virtually everybody in the Congress including Republicans and including Democrats believes that the intelligence community, all 17 agencies are correct when they unanimously say that Russia involved itself in our election through hacking and other means. They believe that Russia did it for the purpose of electing Donald Trump. They are not saying whether it had any effect or notDl Budowsky added.”
I can add that hearing one of israel’s gay fascist goebbelsian wannabees (they misrepresent themselves as “conservative talk radio” in pindoland, the only part of the zio-gay corporate media who promoted trump), that these zio-sods are already preparing the narrative against trump should he follow through with his campaign promises regarding Russia and Syria. These homosexual zio-quisling’s never forget who is buttering their fat bums.
The propaganda coming out of the Deep State is ridiculously transparent.
The “PropOrNot” list distributed earlier in December was clearly nonsense but it laid the foundation for the “fake news” line of attack against critics who would call foul on the ludicrous “election hacking” lies.
That ham-handed stupidity is breathtaking to behold.
Trump is using “hybrid warfare” against the US establishment :)
A Zionist stooge… or Putins puppet… or a US patriot same as the Russian leadership are Russian patriots.
Hopefully he stays alive long enough and in power long enough for us to judge him on his actions.
I don’t often agree with Peter Koenig, but his assessment of Obama’s and Clinton is spot on.
Cambridge Analytica was very effective, but a fact that can’t be overlooked is that Hillary Clinton was a horrible candidate and Donald Trump surprised everyone by emerging as a shrewd politician and a brilliant candidate.
Beyond the personalities, the election was a clear choice between the globalism of the Deep State represented by Hillary Clinton, and “populist nationalism” represented by Donald Trump. Two antithetical visions.
Hillary Clinton has always been a polarizing figure in America. Even as First Lady she was unlikeable and has a knack for offending people. Add to that her well-known corruption, documented lies, and her disastrous tenure as Secretary of State and its surprising she didn’t lose by more.
Prince fan
“its surprising she didn’t lose by more.”
Rack that up to hubris (after all, the sods had the zio-gay media pulling for them), poor electoral college strategy and that they underestimated the amount of votes they should have “diebolded”. Without the voting fraud, I estimate they would have lost the popular vote by a few points as the more reliable polls showed trump ahead by that amount.
I mostly agree with Peter Koenig, but all big ‘social media’ corporations (with data) were working for Hitlery, so if anyone could send targeted messages it’d be Hitlery/Roth-child & Co.
These inventers (of the black sewing yarn) from Cambridge might’ve had some influence, but by far the main reason was Trump’s message of Americanism not (Nazi-) globalism, the first American president since Carter/Reagan, more promising than Kennedy, and for sure the best chance for Americans to get their country back since 1913.
Which (the latter) is now inevitable anyway, because the (Nazi) establishment narrowly failed to turn he USA into a (Nazi) fascist or Jewish Bolshevik (Marxist) dictatorship by way of voter fraud (Hitlery had only about 10% of the real vote, period).
Once a country is turned into a tyranny (e.g. Germany under Hitler & Ferkel Merkel) it is very difficult to get rid of it. The elections & the media will be totally rigged, there’ll be censorship, a mostly unarmed public, and so forth.
Fixing the non-transparent, non-verifiable, monstrously fraudulent (electronic) voting system is a priority now. The elections in Austria were also clearly rigged (see Bev Harris).
@Laika, re: Clinton’s real votes – The Clinton Foundation’s own strategist and pollster, Benenson Strategy Group, documented her support in three weekly polls ending Sept 30, Oct 7 and Oct 13 report which showed her solid support dropping by about 10% per week from 33 to 13% by 10/13 [see at rense.com/general96/hillaryagenda.pdf]. So by Nov 8 her real popularity was probably nowhere near the MSM 47% but deep in the single digits – almost everywhere – but masked by corrupted GEMS vote-counting software [jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/10/31/biggest-election-fraud-in-history-discovered-in-the-united-states/ and Fraction Magic vote counting – Bev Harris of Black Box voting.org /fraction-magic-1/GEMS (Global Election Management System)]. You can know it was never good for her when Trump was pulling in thousands to his rallies and she tens.
“I mostly agree with Peter Koenig, but all big ‘social media’ corporations (with data) were working for Hitlery, so if anyone could send targeted messages it’d be Hitlery/Roth-child & Co.”
I thought exactly that.
However, the campaigns had to be fundamentally different since only Hillary had control of the media.
Trump had just that to work on.
I suspect that perhaps total control over the media has amplified and facilitated the effect of individualized advertising.
Trump rebuffed by U.S. intelligence chief over Russian hacking
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/trump-still-skeptical-as-congress-begins-russian-hacking-probe/article33510487/
“The Washington Post (official purveyor of Fake Administration News), citing anonymous U.S. officials……. said there were disparities between efforts to infiltrate Democratic and Republican networks, and said the United States intercepted communications in which Russian officials celebrated Mr. Trump’s victory”
Wow! Who else might have celebrated -maybe a majority of US voters? Do you think? Amongst others too who think Trump is at least a lesser of evils? ”
” An unclassified version of the report will be released next week, Mr. Clapper said. That version, expected to be a fraction of the length of the classified one, is not likely to answer all the questions about Russia’s actions. Exactly how the United States monitors its adversaries in cyberspace is a closely guarded secret, since revealing such details could help foreign governments further obscure their activities”
We are not interested in how but what -and ‘past use by date’ Ukrainian Phishing code (and generic descriptions of it) that only constitutes part of any attack won’t cut it.
You’d think by now they’d be able to cook up a specific semi-believable attack profile with detail.
Hogwash from the dissembling empty suit Clapper the Crapper. You’re fired!
‘What is going on?’ Trump wonders why FBI never requested access to the DNC’s ‘hacked servers’
https://www.rt.com/usa/372796-trump-fbi-dnc-hacking/
“The Democratic National Committee would not allow the FBI to study or see its computers info after it was supposedly hacked by Russia,” President-elect tweeted after the DNC reportedly confirmed that the bureau failed to send their own staff to check the servers.
“So how and why are they so sure about hacking if they never even requested an examination of the computer servers? What is going on?,” the next US president asked.
Commenting on Clapper’s testimony, John McAfee, the founder of McAfee antivirus software, told RT that Clapper engaged in the “most deceptive propaganda” that was ever delivered to the American public. McAfee added, “our intelligence community is so ignorant and naive that they should all be replaced.”
Agree the sods need replacement. Disagress they are innocent lambs. These are lowlife who are doing the work they want to do. They know exactly what they are doing and loving the wealth and status they receive from it, like all right wing quislings do. Any ignorance is entirely willful and fully war criminal and treasonist. Line ’em up, you know where.
Bang.
If there was any doubt about the political corruption of the US intelligence services under Obama this “Russians celebrating Trump victory” should put it to rest.
I believe the Russians celebrated the defeat of Hillary Clinton, as did any sane person.
No joke, the Russians are fully aware of the Deep State, and the Globalist “Empire’s war against Russia”.
Hillary Clinton is a corrupt, war-mongering MORON. It was HER foreign policy to destabilize the Middle East, to empower the Muslim Brotherhood.
Had she won, her reckless jingoism would surely have started a shooting war with Russia.
They expect under Trump the United States will begin acting like a “normal” country, not a hysterical woman fretting about “the children” and the “Responsibility to Protect”.
So yes, I believe the Russians celebrated Hillary’s defeat.
The fact that the detectable hacking attempts appear to be the work of non-professionals using substandard obsolete tools PROVES it was the Russkies, cleverly disguising their evil tracks.
Right, use ancient trojan tools which every virus checker will have in its database signatures/heuristics and will both detect and reject. Brilliant!
We hope he fired them all in today 01/06/2017 after meeting in Trump Tower…. they all (4 ) looks like from HITCHCOCK movies.
To really make a point, irrefutable even to die-hard Exceptionals and Indispensables, regarding the implausibility of all this Russian ‘hacking’ nonsense: Wouldn’t it just be far simpler (and highly amusing!) to show some Pindostani movie clips with bright Pindo Übermenschen totally trashing evil, retarded Russian Untermenschen and then rhetorically ask: “How could possibly these miserable Russian animals ever be capable of messing with The Indispensable Nation’s Presidential elections?”
The impression that you and so many here delusionally believe that the who actually matters indicates your lack of critical thinking skills. The entire process is nothing more than a dog and pony show whivh occurs every four years to mind control those who participate in the charade into believing their voices and votes matter. If those in leadership positions in Russia believe the illegitimate process has any actual bearing on policy and real politik, the esteem this resident of “pindostan”, your pet verbal creation, holds for certain individuals is surely misplaced. The who will do as told rest assured. The who will not dictate policy. The restraint being the considerable affect of facing one’s demise has on behaviors. YBP.
Could you put that in layman’s terms, please? My humble suggestion was that given the corporate fascist US misculture’s total hatred of Russians, people who appreciate such ‘cultural expressions’ should refute — in no uncertain terms — the notion that Russians could ever have hacked the Exceptional and Indispensable presidential election. Fair enough?
The other problem Hillary Clinton faced can be summed up thusly: “You can’t polish a turd.”
Given the choice between a nice hot meal and a poke in the eye, there is no amount of money that will influence people to choose a pole in the eye.
The democrats had little enthusiasm for Hillary Clinton; she couldn’t even beat fringe candidate crackpot Bernie Sanders in her own party’s primary. Had the democrats done as the republicans did, and run a 17 candidate field in the hopes that their anointed choice would garner the largest plurality, she would have fared just as poorly as the hapless “low energy” Jeb.
This is not to take anything away from Cambridge Analytica. But it was Donald Trump who was smart enough to fire his campaign staff twice when they were unable to produce, before assembling the final team that brought Cambridge aboard. And it was the final team that realized more states were in play than Clinton’s ossified team of sclerotic democrat operatives.
The kind of’ Psychometrics’ that Cambridge Analytica is doing, is being researched and applied by hundreds of companies, think tanks and research institutes with almost unlimited funding by the Pentagon/CIA/BankingCartel.
Ten thousand of MKUltra scientists, social engineers, propaganda specialists, psychologists, neurologists, coders & hackers are involved with projects along these Brave New World lines.
Internet censorship, social media manipulation, fake news mind programming are already ‘ghost’ embedded in every WWW page you visit.
In 2017 all these trends will further explode with hardly anybody noticing it. Why? Because Brave New World censorship and mass mind control is invisible.
I would urge caution in using one piece of news, or any single fact or data point, to draw long, complex conclusions.
Politics is a billion-to-trillion dollar game, where fates of those with power and without converge. There is a vast socio-psycho-chemical degree of research conducted by intel agencies to obtain whatever deluded manifest destiny they have.
It would appear Trump is the nationalist leader many want, but do not let that blind you from facts as they continue to unfold. If he invades another country (say, Iran) or simply lowers taxes for the 1%, then this answer to our problems will have been another ruse in a long line. Eventually the saying, repeating the same action over and over and expecting a different result, begins to ring true.
Trump clearly has handlers, in this case it looks like pentagon officials, that influence his tweeting and strategy. You cannot rectify the Trump we have seen give talks, with simple english and little depth, and his revolutionary (so far) nationalistic strategy without believing someone else is guiding him.
Stick to pragmatism and always distrust those with all the money and tools.
Nils
You write, “I would urge caution in using one piece of news, or any single fact or data point, to draw long, complex conclusions.”
Aint that the truth. Could not agree more. It is an important point you have made.
On another matter, with regards to President-elect Trump it should be recalled that he took a modest sized business and turned it into a very, very large one, propelling himself to multi-billionaire status. Along the way was also able to become well-known through his books, appearances etc. and also on the TV as an entertainer. These achievements did not occur by accident. They took sustained effort by a talented, capable and effective man. He’d have to be intelligent and, much more importantly, extremely disciplined in his actions to be able to do all this.
Having reviewed what I have found about President-elect Trump’s long career (there is a surprising amount of information available in the public domain), there are two suspicions. They are, firstly, that he had his mind on the presidency for an extended period of time (perhaps as long as a decade or two), that he had strong reservations about the direction the USA was being pushed into taking by Washington, and that he made his decision early during the Obama regime (possibly confirming it and “pulling the trigger” as late as 2014). His tilt at the Whitehouse was not entered into casually or as trivially as a professional politician would have done, nor was it simply a matter of ambition, pride or hubris, rather it was as the result of a long and deliberate process of consideration, analysis and purposeful activity. He investigated it carefully alright.
Trump is too wealthy and successful in his own life to need the troubles and vilification he faces presently. He’d have known what he was getting into. To make the decision to have a go would appear to indicate he has some solid reasons and values he believes in. It is likely some of them are similar to those that saw a young V Putin Esq deciding to attain the Presidency of the Russian Federation.
Secondly, it is more than unlikely that he is “handled” (led in the manner that Obama is). President-elect Trump is his own man. Sure, he’d have advisors and assistants and analysts and have a team, but it would be the case that while he takes advice it is he who makes the ultimate decision. He is his own man, as he has been throughout a long career of both successes and failures. It is unlikely this would have changed merely because he has entered the realm of politics.
Conclusion: it is doubtful that there are any “handlers” running Mr Trump. We’d agree there would be people delivering information and opinion to him which could influence him, but in the end it would be the case that he’d make the decision each time.
It remains interesting to see how the new Presidency plays out. It is to be hoped that there will be a repair in the relationship between the two major super-powers (Russian Federation and USA), especially as there is the emergence of a third super-power developing presently with potentially a forth super-power to come in due course. Negotiation, achievement of understandings and setting in place agreements are far preferable to irrational hatreds, destruction, violence and wars.
Siotu
Right, when pigs dance. Ever consider your mind is being manipulated. Your analysis that “Trump’s his own man” matters not one iota. He WILL do as instructed or it’s “Step outta line the man come and take you away”. Pleasant dreams.
Charles
Yeah. Riiiiight.
And he built his businesses by doing as instructed or else he’d be taken away. Yeah. Sure he did.
Consider, not everyone thinks as you do. Consider, some people achieve success in their lives not by thinking as you do but by thinking and acting in a quite different manner, Trump among them.
His is a type of strongly driven personality which seeks success in the attainment of hugely ambitious goals. These sorts of people are intensely focused, directed towards perfection, they take risks and pursue difficult to achieve goals that others won’t even allow themselves to consider as even remotely attainable. These personalities are not available to be “instructed” or even routinely threatened (in fact they are exactly the last type of person you ought to even consider threatening, let alone getting on the wrong side of). They take their own counsel, not that of others.
Over the duration of a multi-decade career President-elect Trump has tasted incredible successes as well as the most crushing defeats, crises and failures. He has come back from severe losses more than once. This is not something most people do or even can do. Mostly they are destroyed and fold after the first serious failure. This guy is different. He is not available to be someone’s puppet. He is his own man. Charles, review the guy’s career. We are dealing with something rather different to Obama or Bush or Blair etc.
The fundamental questions are, what does he want to do and what will he be able to achieve with what is available to him. I’m with President Putin on this. We must wait to see.
Siotu
Thank you!! Hit the nail on the head with your comment. Deficate in one hand and hope in the other, see what you have afterwards.
I have been around for a while.
Seen them come and go. Seen them change once they had real power. Seen the courageous ones be destroyed politically, or simply killed,
I suspect you are right.
A quiet lunch, show some nice pictures of the children. Perhaps a reference to JFK. No need to say more.
Not sure that ‘mind manipulations’ can be laid exclusively at the door of Cambridge Analytica – it’s just a targeted marketing operation. The media played a far greater role, only to finally expose itself: manipulation is completely ineffective if it is not concealed.
The success of Trump cannot be credited to CA either: the same was done for Ted Cruz, mainly through grooming him for the targeted evangelical vote. Yet he didn’t succeed in getting the nomination, much less the presidency. How ‘effectual’ is that?
The real reason in my view is the sheer taint of corruption and arrogance around Clinton. She was the worst choice the Dems could have made.
They had more realistic chance with, believe it it not, Sanders, once he progressed in the campaign to diffuse the socialist rhetoric ( which he is not a serious proponent of anyway – his main schtick was anti-corporatism, not anti-capitalism. That was stolen from him by Trump to bring the ‘left’ vote into the fold, enough of whom were finally prepared to take a risk with him or vote ineffectually for Stein.)
Eimar
Quoting, “The real reason in my view is the sheer taint of corruption and arrogance around Clinton. She was the worst choice the Dems could have made.”
You are surely right on the money! The taint corruption and arrogance did her in alright. It goes even further than that though.
There is a growing dissatisfaction with professional politicians throughout the USA. Many people have experienced a falling standard of living. They are now in the position of directly witnessing the startling differences between what they experience in daily living against what they are being told by the media, by professional politicians, by many economists, by bureaucrats etc. They have become unbelievers! They have started to disbelieve the liars. So they start to seek an alteration to the situation. Hence the rebel or the outsider is considered much more seriously than before. Being shunned by the media (who have delegitimised themselves in the public domain) and being an outsider (not a professional politician) sure helped Mr Trump.
As far as Bernie Sanders is concerned, he would have been a better candidate than was Hillary Rodham-Clinton. He still would have lost though. The man is not a fighter. For example, when pinned on direct questions he dissembles, stammers and hammers and in the end refuses to answer. Then he gets annoyed and ceases further communication. One is reminded of how he couldn’t answer the simple question about how socialism is doing over Venezuela. He folded and ran.
Do not forget that old Bernie has been given a nice new house (+$600k) for being the good boy and endorsing Rodham-Clinton even after he was well aware he’d had the nomination bilched from him. Basically, the guy is old and tired- too tired to stand up for himself, let alone any principle he proclaimed.
President-elect Trump did not steal anything from old Bernie. He didn’t need to. Bernie burned his own supporters- cast then adrift for the pay-out. Unprincipled is the term that comes to mind.
BTW one wonders how a leftie person who was a serious anti-capitalist could vote for a capitalist Mr Trump. That would be unprincipled.
The beginning of the end for the present arrangements began with Ron Paul. He shocked and surprised many (particularly those in the Republican Party establishment) with the support he generated in mostly the young. His message was a simple one. He is a liberty minded Constitutionalist. He has remained consistent with his message for the entirety of a very long career. He did not abandon principle for a nice pay-off. Better to be remembered as consistent to one’s principles than doing the opposite.
Now comes a big test for the new President-elect. Will he stick to his principles? Can he be bought off with a new house?
Siotu
If one analyzes the semantic value of the “hacking” claims and contrasts these with objective reality, one is forced to conclude that “hacking” means, more or less, anything the speaker either imagines or sees – provided he does not like it.
The term, the meaning, has declined to mean nothing.
Any one who has run into Friendly Fred, the used car salesman, and paid attention, knows how this works, and anyone who has made his living in sales (sales — not ‘marketing’) is expert in it.
Do you want a car with good pickup?
Sure!
You should like this car.
Do you want a car that can drive to the moon on just 5 gallons of gas?
Sure.
You should like this car.
(Note he never said ‘will’ or that the car would do that — just that ‘you *should* like this car’ no matter what you want — you should like this car because I want to sell it to you.)
Tell the customer what he wants to hear. Determine what he wants and tell him how your junk looks like it can do it.
Fabulous Sam Rosenberg, in NJ, has a humongous billboard that read (If I can’t help you I won’t hurt you’. I don’t how good the cars he sold were, but when I was a kid and I saw that I thought “Ah, but he could help anyone — just give them a car for free — so he might also hurt anyone”. He wasn’t lying — he was BSing. Basic salesmanship.
Sure Trump told different audiences whatever they wanted to hear — basic salesmanship. Trump is a salesman. Clinton told people they were deplorable and would start a nuclear war with Russia. Rotten salesmanship! :-D
You don’t need a degree from Cambridge to figure this out. A couple of years barking at a carnival — or in Wrestle mania — is all you need to become an expert. (“But you gotta know the territory!” — The Music Man …. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUyuE-uvdiM )
Trump is an excellent salesman and a closer par excellence – but one thing he did NOT do is change his message for different audiences. That was really the “secret sauce” that put him in a class by himself.
Trump sounded a certain trumpet, and the people responded. He had a broadly appealing message addressed to all AMERICANS – regardless of which “identity politics” bin the Left puts them into.
He didn’t invent himself for the election; the positions he espoused have been consistent over several decades and probably his entire life. Trump appeared on the Donahue Show in 1987. What he said then was identical to what he said on the stump in 2016.
Interestingly, he was at the time critical of President Reagan’s policies toward Japan. He didn’t think the politicians were making good deals then, either.
Google on trump contradictions
blue
1/. Google context.
2/. Google editing.
Si
Thanks, blue. Very good analysis of that man. Best yet, in my opinion.
What he will do and what he really wants remains to be seen, but as for his dealing with the politicians one maxim comes to mind: you can’t BS a BSer. Trump is a pro at it — world class — made his fortune with it.
I suspect his mind is more fluid or mobile than most — related to being a realist instead of an ideologue — meaning he evaluates a situation on the fly and acts according to his perception of the current situation, so I don’t expect too much consistency from him, but that throws off opponents who try to figure him out and form strategies. Unpredictability, at least publicly, is one of his weapons or tools. Expect the unexpected (like we see from Putin). It’s like trying to hit a dancing boxer who doesn’t stand still — by the time you strike he isn’t there any more — or maybe he was never where you thought he was.
(He will love the intelligence community — unless he decides to bust it apart.)
It’s going to be very interesting… and will want a lot of reading between the lines.
Everyone on the planet (particularly American street-sheep) who is beginning to think a little bit, will eventually begin to see how they have been HOSED by the mass media and technology. When it all gels, there will be a trend toward chaos and anarchy.
The biggest hosing has been administered by Gates (Katz), Zuckerberg and Brinn(sky).
Imagine Katz selling you something, computers, which work worse than the legendary FIAT, which was said to stand for Fix It Again Tony, and then you have to pay double for it just to have it work.
I paid 700 for my laptop (A bargain! LOL which costs 70 to make) but that 700 cost is doubled because buying something that works so badly without prepaying for unlimited ‘assistance’ makes no sense for the vast majority of people. Personal computers are the biggest scam since Dutch tulip bulbs.
And let us not even begin to discuss how the PC and Mac have deprived us of the last shreds of privacy, and freedom from intrusion/surveillance, we may have thought we had.
I have to ask – would you feel any better about these guys if they were, say, Presbyterians and not of Jewish extraction?
I assume the Jew angle is what you’re getting at with the “Gates/Katz” and -sky” stuff.
Franz most certainly does, and Bill Katz (whether it is the original Yiddish name of his family or not) is the perfect name for ‘Bill Gates’.
The backward, very organized & totalitarian mafia (Roth-child led) Pharisaic Taludism got their hands on the ‘money [out of thin air] press’. Since the 17th century, starting with the Bank of Amsterdamn – 1609.
Because of this monstrous fraud, this (very organized evil sect, or) organized crime syndicate could easily slide their evil goons in front everywhere. (the reason so many of the ‘rich’ are Jews)
Bill Katz also sells deadly Nazi vaccines by the way,which are actually meant to cause diseases (!), or ruin the health of non- (Aske-) Nazis, rather than to prevent them.
We would have to wait and see. If a ‘Presbyterian’ conspiracy becomes visible and 100 times more top government and political posts are held by Presbyterians than there are Presbyterians in the general population, we can talk.
The war drums are beating heavily here in the U.S. Democrats (regular people) do not oppose this since it takes the focus off of the corruption of the party they blindly support. Not until after the war starts will they protest and comolain that they were lied to.
The only way to stop this is to expose the ugly truth. I see Russia’s only way to prevent the coming war is to truly expose the truth for the world to see.
I am hoping that Trump’s administration will do that themselves but, I see how deep the resistance for this is with the Republican party as it would expose their corruption as well.
Beyond politics now. I stopped caring about politics a few years ago but, the stakes are so high now that it would be negligence to turn my back to it knowing where things are headed for my country.
FBIANON – your Option B is false, it is the same as Option C. I question if it was your entire intent to embed that false option within a decent amount of useful information. There is no coexistence, the game is now all or nothing.
Taken as a bio-mass, the Americans are probably now the most dangerous people on Earth.
The huge spread between their utter lack of knowledge and infantilism, on one hand, and the unethical potential for violence of their ruling regime in Washington, is a disaster waiting to unfold.
One hopes that it can be made to unfold internally. It is time to quarantine Israel and the USA.
Franz,
I agree Americans are the most dangerous people on earth. Due to ignorance and lowering moral values. Also, it is not just our government’s potential for violence, this has spread to the the people as well.
17% of U.S. workers work for Federal, State or Local gov.
US has 33% of market share for global arms sales, How many work or rely on the MIC for a living?
Only thing Liberals and Conservatives can agree on is that Israel must be “defended” at all costs no matter what their behavior is.
Combine the groups above and you have enough public support for war.
Yes, there is a lot of good people in America. But there are a lot that are perfectly willing to let themselves get fooled into another war because they see a personal benefit from it. The real ugly truth is that not only is our government corrupted but, so are many of the everyday citizens. You can go on CNN, TIme, NY Times facebook pages and view comments for daily real-time evidence of this.
Only way to stop it is to clearly show Americans the risk is not worth the reward. To show consequences for it that America has not really seen since WWII.
The ‘transgender’ cult epitomizes why the US is in moral decay.
Any society that throws its children – the future – to the wolves is destined to breakdown:
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/the-cult-of-transgender/
My spider sense is telling me to be very skeptical about articles like this. Reminds of the nonsense I used to see in the Readers’ Digest, and of the ‘fake news’ I see in the MSM.
Really?
You think its fake?
I don’t.
Ask people who have teenage kids – especially in public schools.
I think it’s spun, and that few people actually have inclinations to change sex. It doesn’t match biology (unless it’s some strange endocrine disruptor pollution). There may be a (sensationalized and alarmized) fad of displaying such things, and while most people apparently are somewhat more towards the middle than exclusively ‘straight or gay’ (most people are bisexual to some degree — bell shaped curve), which may be part of the motivation towards acceptance of having both feminine and masculine aspects, I find it difficult to believe that the basic sexual orientations of people have change much over time. I see the kids walking to and from school and around town, and I can’t say I have seen any who are transgendered or dressing more strangely than kids have always dressed.
Now, all my life I have heard insults or comments from people calling other gay, or saying ‘that’s so gay’ and this is quite popular now, but it had not been a literal meaning. Recently I have heard a lot of comments about things like ‘pedo-liberals in the west, and so forth, but I think that is also off the mark — and sexual orientation has nothing to do with morality, really, except in a limited religious sense.
Certainly animals, not a product of human culture (and even various human cultures), have no human hangups with either confused homosexual behavior, or reacting to any other furry lump, including juveniles — it’s just something that happens at times. It’s not new with humans either — look at the ancient ‘pornography’ and eroticism. (The GrayLump cat needs some watching at times to discourage him from trying to mate with kittens, of either sex, and some dogs need to be chased away from people’s legs).
What we do have is an insane, perverted, and convoluted culture which distorts everything, everywhere, and exploits any sort of deviation from completely central norms for political and financial gains. It’s similar to how every time we turn around there is some new ‘disease’ which people need to see a health industry professional for, and take some expensive new drug or therapy. That, I think is the problem: exploitation of relatively normal — or even even few S.D. out behavior — that would not have been such a big deal in the past, while at the same ignoring things which actually are different and alarming, such as polar ice caps melting. Managed news and managed perceptions.
According to http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/05/laverne-cox-LGBT-transgender-demographic-data-census there are not good numbers about it — but one number is .3%, which is not very many, even if more attention is being paid to it. Old literature talked about cross-dressing as not being all that unusual.
http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Gates-How-Many-People-LGBT-Apr-2011.pdf says
“an estimated 19 million Americans (8.2%) report that they have engaged in same-sex sexual behavior and nearly 25.6 million Americans (11%) acknowledge at least some same-sex sexual attraction.”
Going by memory that does not sound so different from what Masters & Johnson, or even Kraft-Ebbing said many decades ago — but people generally minded their own business back then and were not always making a big thing out of people’s private life — or pursuing a political or financial agenda from it. We also more freedom to ‘come out’, and perhaps more social pressure to ‘experiment’ more. Yet, I could hardly call this a cult or think the fundamental human being is different.
Obviously the most natural thing is to be homosexual when young, serving ones mentor, through the time you are in the military, and then settle down with a wife when more mature and have children — obviously according to a reported time period in some the ancient Greek city states….
B
“Obviously the most natural thing is to be homosexual when young, serving ones mentor, through the time you are in the military, and then settle down with a wife when more mature and have children — obviously according to a reported time period in some the ancient Greek city states….”
Those were very hierarchical and homosexually oriented societies. IE: classic right wing, which they were. Why would anybody else want to emulate that crap?
B
From the article:
“Earlier this year, I contacted a scientist about a strictly scientific question related to biology and homosexuality, but he refused to comment. I found that strange, because my question wasn’t ideologically loaded at all. It was just scientific, and his answer presumably would have been too. He said that in academia, there is among professors now such fear of the mob that many of them figure it’s safer to keep one’s mouth shut rather than say something that one of these young Jacobins will take as offensive, no matter how absurd that reading is, and then set about ginning up the mob to destroy the scholar’s professional life.”
That para essentially nails the piece as rubbish. The writer failed to say what she asked the “scientist”. Not by accident , but by design, since the question would have undermined what the writer wanted to portray. If one is going to use something as an example, failure to lay out what that something is reeks of dishonesty and manipulation. IE: agenda driven, rather than factual.
I suspect this transgender bs is one of those “safe” controversies, like unisex restrooms, where something which doesn’t threaten the zpc/nwo, is exaggerated to draw off attention from real problems, like zionazi war crimes…
I’ll bet pregnancy of adolescent girls under the age of 14 due to failure of decent sex ed and support for these girls, which the far right faggots made sure the kids would not get in pindoland is still a much worse problem than kids wanting sex changes, by the numbers. All so they could push some no longer relevant to human society medieval totalitarian backwardness and zionazis could laugh their arises off on the way to to bank about the gullibility of goys.
What is the sex of a child when the body parts blown off can’t be found?
The gender wars view from Mt Olympus:
1. Divide and conquer the slaves.
2. Get them to locate their primary identity between their legs rather than between their ears.
3. “We need about 5 -6 billion less of them. At the rate we are going, if too many wake up to our ways, we are toast.”
4. Ergo, since ramping up the “Master Race” eugenics efforts of a century ago, with forced sterilizations and all that, and wars and epidemics have fallen short of the desired reduction in human numbers employ mind control to get the human herd to cull itself!
Adaptation to changes in environment in all species, including human, is only possible because of the dynamic of epigenetics: the environment you are in including the thoughts and emotions that you experience willfully or unwillfully can actually tweak the genetic code in your sperm or ova. It is NOT forever fixed, like unalterable computer code. Ergo, your conscious will has a role to play. You are alive, not a robot. You are not simply playing out your DNA, mechanically. If you are awake to what you are doing, that is.
However, “the elites” have their own ideas for you, if you will submit to them. And those ideas entail no freedom, no resistance, ie slavery. Extend the concept of epi-genetics to “Epi-eugenics” and you will be studying a main NWO social engineering blue print for human slavery = Empire of the Mind.
https://youtu.be/2E9pM2pWbDA?t=1985
Mr Passio breaks it down, Free Your Mind Conference 2016
Bro… Looking for a few minutes and some jumping through at the video it seems to me he does not understand epigenetics or genetics. Epigentics does not change the ‘code’ but the expression of it, which can be limited or far reaching depending on the molecular activity involved. It has nothing to do with occultism.
Too often people learn some things and then other people grab a piece and go off the deep end with it as if they were taking one strand of it and bungee jumping off a cliff. Epigenetics itself is a new and very complex field where little is yet known, but the effects of it are as likely to thwart ‘free will’ as to open it up, and to determine beliefs — and the idea of ‘free will’ is itself fraught with difficulty and contradictions.
Passio strikes me as another one of those nutty ‘conspiracy and secret knowledge’ cult con men, like L. Ron Hubbard, and David Ike.
Virtually none of this stuff, including the idea of consciousness, is correctly framed — resembles what alchemists said because they didn’t understand any chemistry, or astrologers said because they didn’t understand astronomy and physics — or what many physicists say because they don’t understand consciousness and energy. Just because we stare into the dark fog does not mean anything someone thinks or say they see is really there (and just because you don’t know something doesn’t mean anyone else does, regardless of how they prattle on). The first thing one should understand about the ‘Illuminati’ is that they don’t know beans and that they are immersed in their BS! Look at them — look at the fools like Clinton or Rockefeller or Gates — you think they really know anything? They are idiots! Idiots with some power and money, but idiots nonetheless.
Blue, with all due respect please suspend judgment a bit longer than 5 minutes or 5 days.
Ask yourself this question: Just when did you know, with certainty that 911 was an inside job, and be able to prove it to thousands or millions of other people?
Answer that question, in the Cafe, please and we will delve deeper into this matter.
Thank you.
Bro 93
(Sorry is this O.K)
Whilst I realise most of the world has gone daft including all these elite politcicans, I am totally convinced that no one was trying to kill my wife on the way to her dance class nearly 7 weeks ago…and if they were – they didn’t succeed. She is a bit like Princess Diana in her emotions and appreciation of dance and children and beauty.
Why would anyone want to kill my wife?
She is Lovely.
And if they did..I would still carry on as normal.
We have nothing to hide because we have done nothing wrong.
So let me post you a bit of truth..
My wife is now upstairs in our bed for the first time in 7 weeks. She got run over by a car on a dark Tuesday night in early November. I thought she was dead but she survived. I never blamed anyone and didn’t want vengeance from anyone. We all make mistakes. I didn’t blame the driver – both my son and the police and my wife checked him out – and it is him who phoned me up..at 7pm..
“Sorry – you don’t know me – but your wife has just been run over” then the phone went dead – and I thought she was,
I knew exactly where she was – crossing the road on the way to her dance class. I was there in a minute and so was my son.
She survived and so will we.
I call her Hopperty Skipperty now.
Our kids occasionally try to help but their timing could be better..
No not now.
We have never had any locks on our doors in our house…
Well the kids have – but we haven’t.
I haven’t slept with my wife for 7 weeks…She hasn’t been upstairs for 7 weeks…
She said – what’s this – with all the Flowers on the bed?
Tony xx
Tony, this is not the Cafe.
All this madness about “Russian hacking” is complete desperation the likes to which I’ve never seen in my life. Can anyone imagine had George W. Bush, the outgoing administration back in 2009, decided to launch an official intelligence inquiry into the legitimacy of Barak Obama’s birth certificate and laid the grounds to put into question the authority of the incoming president? This is we are today.
January 20th can’t come fast enough.
What a great article,as a 72 year old, it’s amazing and mind boggling but fashinating what a time to be living.
The sacking of the supermarkets and the rioting in Mexico is being organized through social media by an unknown party.
http://www.sinembargo.mx/05-01-2017/3132928
I am sorry, I respect Peter Koenig very much but in this article he is out of his depth. The techniques he is speaking about are only one of applications of psychometrics, a branch of statistics established about 100 years ago. The power of these techniques is prediction, not influence. Yes, one can predict electorate behavior, but influencing that behavior is a different matter. psychometricians cannot do it. Trump had to do it himself, which is what he would have to do in the first place.
Trump: Only “Stupid People Or Fools” Want War With Russia
“Having a good relationship with Russia is a good thing, not a bad thing. Only “stupid” people, or fools, would think that it is bad!”
Having been fully briefed on the “intelligence” proving Russians ‘hacked’ the election – because how else could Hillary Clinton have lost? – president-elect Trump is starting to shift the narrative this morning to expose the establishment’s blinkered warmongery for missing the bigger picture that could be possible…
Having a good relationship with Russia is a good thing, not a bad thing. Only “stupid” people, or fools, would think that it is bad! We…..
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 7, 2017
have enough problems around the world without yet another one. When I am President, Russia will respect us far more than they do now and….
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 7, 2017
both countries will, perhaps, work together to solve some of the many great and pressing problems and issues of the WORLD!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 7, 2017
Sites like this have done a lot to awaken people, and they are talking among themselves, sharing information face to face, like the Russians did back in Soviet times. Even Lou Dobbs is aware of how discredited his MSM is:
Lou Dobbs ✔ @LouDobbs
#LDTPoll: Who do you believe on the Russian hacking allegations?
6:01 PM – 3 Jan 2017 ·
6% President Obama
94% Julian Assange
Maybe I agree, but I’m not sure — maybe it’s the wrong word, and ‘propaganda’ would be better — or ‘public relations’ as I think Bernays and Lipmann termed it. In any case, it’s one of the ‘black arts’, like economics, neurolinguistics, and time/motion studies.
Anyway, I’m reading an interesting article about Trump:
http://journal-neo.org/2017/01/07/trump-the-us-president-the-world-deserved-emerges/
07.01.2017 Author: Phil Butler
Trump: The US President the World Deserved Emerges
…
which seems worth passing on a link to.
Trump is beginning t look like the weather: everybody talks about it but no one can do anything about it.
If this could have happened in America it should have happened in our country south Africa in 2016 municipal elections.
Phew it seems the Apocalypse is postponed for 6 years…the star of man to make its appearance in 2022.
https://www.sott.net/article/338913-Spectacular-collision-of-suns-will-create-new-star-in-night-sky-in-2022
Its an important article because this is what Obama´s sick pervert Western world is about: Academic semantic manipulation of peoples heart and brain.
But the truth is mostly simple, academic theories not. Dont forget that.
Unidentified Person Rams Truck Into Crowd in Jerusalem, Casualties Reported
https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/201701081049370437-jerusalem-truck-attack/
“According to local media, the attack was supposedly carried out by a Palestinian person and targeted IDF soldiers.
Arab #terrorist truck attack, #Jerusalem. 3 IDF dead, 1 IDF critical, 6 serious, 15 light. Soldiers from officers course from Gedud Erez. pic.twitter.com/VOqU2T7k2M
— Israel News Online (@IsraelNewsOrg) 8 января 2017 г.
The victims of this terror ramming attack are Israeli soldiers who were getting off a tour bus for a gathering at the tayelet
— ERH Jerusalem (@ERHinJerusalem) 8 января 2017 г.”
This the first of these attacks directed at israelis that I’ve heard of. Note the differences with similar appearing attacks in Europe and the usa. In Europe and the usa, the victims were random civilians, this Jerusalem attack specifically was against israeli soldiers.
US commandos to back South Korea’s potential assassination of Kim Jong-un – report
https://www.rt.com/news/372966-korea-kim-assassination-brigade/
” If Seoul launches an operation to assassinate North Korea’s leader in the event of war, US special operations forces would participate, Yonhap news agency claims.
The South Korean task force charged with eliminating the North Korean government in case of a war would be 1,000 to 2,000 strong, the report added.
Seoul announced plans for creating an anti-Kim unit earlier this week, citing a rising threat from Pyongyang. The idea has been circulating among South Koran officials for a while, with some even suggesting that the assassination should not be delayed until an open military conflict.”
This is most likely a terrorist force not too much different from the american ones that raided North Korea in the 1940s, which eventually brought the Korean war, and likely will be used in a similar manner, committing mostly terror attacks to increase hostility and push the North into retaliating. Which in turn will be used as an excuse to attack North Korea. That’s how the zpc/nwo operates.
They put it nicely “In the event of war…”
What they mean is that the war will start when the attempt to decapitate the NK leadership in a repeat attack…
Repeat attack?
Shure. The SK’s started the war when they invaded the North…way back when. The war never stopped, only most of the shooting…
Doubt? I. F. Stone reported through an eye witness… Look it up.
Anyway the brigade is an attack force… Part, no doubt, of the famous “pivot”.
One judges by capabilities what the Policy must be…
Alexander Nix? What kind of name is that? A demon name.
As Alex Jones says, ‘the psychopaths (and demons) always leave a ‘tell’.
I always suspect that the cool Acronym (OCEAN) comes first, and the bullshit follows, filling in the information vacuum.
I think the “C” in “OCEAN” is “Conscientiousness” rather than “Consciousness”.