by Denis A. Conroy for The Saker Blog
In the capitalist West, a reinvention of bourgeois culture is continuously expressed through ownership of devises that legitimise power. Alternating forms of bourgeois culture come and go to allow the public to toy with alternative bourgeois values, but never with the idea of alternatives ‘to’ bourgeois values as such. The net result of all of this is that the public is permitted to pay lip service to democracy while being forced to submit to a stitch-up…or, an exogenous variable whose time-line is no longer relevant but continues to do what it has always done, allow elites to emasculate the public voice. The best example of this is to be found in private narratives that exist for the purpose of legitimising the private sector’s methods of wealth extraction by promoting a trickle-down version of philanthropic mush to those who passively accept the status quo.
This capitalist trajectory is indubitably observed in the stepping-stones that history’s dealers put in place for themselves to achieve positions of pre-eminence. From Mayer Amschel Rothchild(ren), banker, 1744-1812, to our present time, dealers have made an artform of dealership, and the current President of the USA…Donald Trump is no exception. It’s his form of exceptionality (make America great again) that we need to look more closely at.
It wasn’t serendipity that enabled elites to acquire the power needed to lord it over the masses, but rather an ability to trade a passage toward creating a centre that could ultimately achieve an institutionally sacrosanct level of security for themselves…the ‘too-big-to-fail’ phenomenon we live with today. As the fundamental building-blocks of a ‘free state’ emerged in America, a branding process was devised that would enable mainstream media and Hollywood to collaborate in imposing a narrative upon an unwitting public. As the old-world class system was introduced into the new world, it became evident that history was repeating itself; people were provided with a catechism by the elites…a propagandistic one…and they swallowed it hook, line, and sinker.
Thereafter, believing that they were baptised and rendered secure in the holy waters of patriotic impunity, they set to performing their anointed role as cheerleaders to the wacky sheriffs who ruled over them. A too-big-to-fail corporate posse came into existence to convince them…bully fashion…that America’s destiny lay in colonizing the world.
Witness the American public’s incontrovertible need to believe in their own exceptionality. They swallow the gruel that their masters feed them without it ever affecting their conscience…their rampaging foreign policy attests to this! If Trump’s blunt assassination of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani, or his administration’s Middle Eastern “deal of the century” signifies anything, it is that Trump’s campaign slogan “Make America Great Again” acknowledges the success of indoctrination vis-à-vis myth. It is the elite who possess the power to awakens an innate call-to-arms mentality in the public when they choose to.
As a consequence of this, the collective mind is alerted to the possibility of losing ‘top dog’ status and it’s self-appointed role in the world. The massive military budget attests to the fact that the myth of American supremacy is to be aggressively pursued at all costs…and considering the stockpile of nuclear missiles, one must assume that this myth has been swallowed hook, line and sinker by the masses.
Washington’s commitment to power owes much to His or Her Majesties Governments when it comes to deal making. The principles acted upon during the time of the First World War are the same principles that explain the current American imperial foreign policy…focus on the money trail and to hell with insignificant natives as they have insignificant cash resources.
On the subject of insignificant natives, the White House published a 180-page document recently entitled “Peace to Prosperity: Vision to Improve the Lives of the Palestinian and Israeli People”…it had all the Balfourian myopia of a similar declaration produced in 1917.
BALFOUR DECLARATION
Foreign Office
November 2nd. 1917
Dear Lord Rothschild,
I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty’s Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.
“His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish People, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.”
I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.
Author(s)Walter Rothschild
Arthur Balfour
Leo Amery
Lord Milner
On reading the above document, one cannot but conclude that America and Zionist Israel have one notable trait in common, the ability to feel exceptional despite the horror their settler cultures imposed on the indigenous people whose countries they have occupied. That their energies go into replicating bourgeois class values, there can be no doubt. The stratified model of class that underpins Western culture, now sadly in need of an overhaul, is of itself a blinkered vision of the world and irredeemably flawed. What the above document reveals, is the Anglo-Zionist banking system’s propensity to see the world in terms of ‘low-hanging-fruit’, especially when it is ripe for the picking.
Donald Trump’s cave-man determination and Bibi Netanyahu’s fake and sugary comity do little to disguise the fact that they are in the business of extracting what blood remains of Palestine’s corporeal existence. A beautiful country exposed to collusion and perfidy at the hands of Anglo-Zionist whose intentions all along were to devour Palestine. The duplicitous process that commenced in 1917…moved from London to Washington, where Harry Truman (1948), while acting as midwife in an onerous deal at a banker’s tea party, set in motion a move that was little more than approving the transfer of a parasite into the host body… Palestine!
That the parasite has devoured most of Palestine in this time frame, seems of little matter to Trump or his ilk. In effect, it is a deal that runs roughshod over the concept of human rights. Indeed, the cabal Trump colludes with convey the impression that they would have no compunction in stripping the Palestinians of the last vestiges of their heritage. But the truth is, contemporary elites can do deceitful things and they are especially capable of repeating this piece of infamy yet again.
And what do we Westerners do about that? Sadly, the answer is nothing, nothing, nothing, because we no longer seem to feel the rapture that comes with being alive. And not being alive, we have become inured to violence. It’s o.k. when Jared Kushner-real-estate-investor extraordinaire, Donald Trump-wheeler-dealer extraordinaire and Bibi Netanyahu-purveyor-of-biblical- myths extraordinaire come together vis-à-vis America’s elitist media to promote more cynical ‘honest-broker-tropes’ to obfuscate the truth behind the occupation of Palestine.
Trump, it must be said, is just one more presidential enabler doing it for Zionist Israel. One can imagine Don phoning Bib and congratulating him; “Bib…honey, you shrunk the Palestinian kids and you have our blessing, its’ a proud day for Zion!” It appears that the intention all along was to reduce Palestine to a few Bantustans. The deal, which proposes granting Zionist Israel all of the West Bank land where it wants to build its settlements beggars belief.
The alliance between America and Zionist Israel is based on religious mythology. Religious mythology, unlike secular mythology (or unreligious stories) tends to be male oriented and its iterations tend toward defending a patriarchal or tribal premise. In the Jewish context, it is primal to the point of loathing the concept of miscegenation…a threatening concept that stubbornly repeats itself in religious myths…and much written about in the Old Testament. It appears that Jewish religious mythology brought forth a phobic fear of emasculation that has now taken a turn for the worse in our modern era. A new iteration involving assets and concomitant devises is expressing itself in a most retrograde fashion…is phobia becoming viral, we need to ask ourselves?
In Zionist Israel, a new milieu has come into existence to launch tribalism into a secondary phase of identity politics. A phase shaped by religious mythology implying something strange and undemocratic. If you are not Jewish, then you are of a lesser stripe…or, of no worth at all!
Perspectives from beyond Zionist Israel might suggest that there is a breeding program afoot that may intensify the Jewish propensity to generate entities that end up looking like angry Meerkats wearing yarmulkes while snarling over territorial rights that keep on stacking up…and surely there must exist somewhere in their bible a text that says that God gave the entire world to them?
On the other hand, America’s part in the alliance is somewhat different. Their brand of religious fervour is part New and part Old Testament but laced with a uniquely American brand of evangelical hubris. It acts out it’s narrative on an industrial scale so as to find traction with the national psyche which loves all things big. It’s the good-guy-bad-guy component that gets it to the Box Office every time. It needs to capitalise on the myth that America as a country exists for the good of mankind. Being good guys (?) they, like the Israelis, need a very large military capability as back-up to their presence on mother earth.
So, it was against this background that Russian Jews…and there were many of them who came to America in the early part of the 20th century…to apply their talents to what might have been thought of as an amorphous culture rich for the picking. They were very talented in matters of business. Upon gaining ownership of media and having become extremely active in the development of Hollywood etc., their influence in American was soon very apparent. As time went by, the general population failed to notice that Zionism, based on religious mythology had entered the body-politic of America’s heartland to reshape the American dream as a corporate one. It was this trend that killed any chance of the Palestinians receiving justice.
To many in the outside world, their voice within the American narrative had become disproportionately righteous, and their use of money to buy support for the colonization of Palestine so egregious, that more and more people across the world were sickened by their continues carping on about the Holocaust…as though it were the only one that mattered…which many in the outside world noticed was used as a means to deflect attention away from criticism.
Eventually the world outside the American-Jewish nexus became weary of Jewish insistence that they were the only voice on the block that had credibility. They began to feel that the kerfuffle surrounding anti-Semitism was one where you were expected to passively accept the righteousness of a Judaic ‘right’ to interpret their own narrative as faultless, and if you questioned this premise, you were against them…anti-Semitic! They were demanding that their interpretations, in matters relating to the holocaust, be taken as gospel.
All of the above was allowed to happen because coup-d’etats are a feature of the American way of doing business. Yesterday it was colonial Europe (foremostly the British empire), today its’ the USA who have the gall to make proposals that concern six million Palestine lives with all the nonchalance attributable to the puerile of mind.
At what point did vulgar materialism begin to shrink the Western imagination? Does quantifying the aspirational desires of America’s notion of freedom distort the amplitude of the American dream? Do Americans and Israelis believe that only they can achieve emancipation per acquisition of other people’s assets? They both like to think that it is their God-given right to own the countries they occupy. It is already clear that these are the defining features of 21st. century statecraft and Trump and his administration is there to do deals with his mate Bibi that entails suffocating what is left of Palestine. If this is America as leader of the democratic world, God help us all!
But the multiplicity of energies that live within the strange narrative that is sold as the American way of doing business remains captive to the whims of the media. Self-congratulatory vectors operate 24/7 in the hope of keeping the average Joe and Joie focused on the splendours and opportunities that exist for them in their market culture. On the home front, political chicanery has trumped the rule of law and foreign policy has become just another way of shafting foreigners. In the main, matters of morality and lack of accountability have become de rigueur. Since money became the elixir of life, the dirty linen factor behind Donald Trump’s impeachment merits little more than a yawn. It seems that the deeds of the elite need to be kept hidden from public scrutiny.
But what is most strange with the American way of doing business is how elites have managed to reverse the roles of journalists who would otherwise disclose truth. An in-your-face culture has come into existence to target whistle-blowers and muffle their voices.
An excellent article by Caitlin Johnstone entitled, “The Primary Mechanism of Oppression is Not Hidden” (February 5, 2020) and published in Consortiumnews.
She writes;
“The key to turning this ship around does not lie hidden somewhere behind a veil of government opacity. It lies in you. It lies in all of us. We can begin awakening our fellow humans right now by attacking the narrative management of the propaganda machine that sits right in front of us, unarmoured and unhidden.”
In conclusion, it is refreshing to encounter writers whose clarity of mind and insights into mythology remain free of religious myths.
John Campbell, the author of “The Power of Myths” is one such writer.
“People say that we’re all seeking a meaning for life.
I don’t think that’s what we’re really seeking. Rather I think we’re seeking an experience of being alive, so that our life expressions will have resonances with our own innermost being and reality, so that we actually feel the rapture to be alive.”
Lets’ wish it to be so for the Palestinians too!!
Denis A. Conroy, Freelance Writer, Australia
Well stated Denis.
The only ‘consolation’ being, that in the state of death we are all equal.
Denis, you said it man. I would like to add couple of thoughts. The problems with Western society is as follows:
1. Everyone is in debt so much so they can’t even move for the fear of losing the imaginary ownership of heavily taxed goods.
Also, the above is very well illustrated by the statements in Greek independent media that “University professors” make idiotic, propagandistic and Anti-Hellenic statements, which can be explained only by the “Fear of losing their cozy jobs and the paycheques that come with those jobs”.
2. The society is so zombified with their noses attached to their phones and tablets that they are oblivious to any and all that is going on around them.
Maybe I am dumb, but this article was grueling to read. In the face complex thoughts, I feel the writer should always as simple(er) words and sentences as possible. You are trying to communicate complex ideas, why would you add to the burden of your readers by tasking them with deciphering long-winded, big wordy sentences? maybe I am just simple minded so don’t take it personally. The writer obviously knows what he is talking about and makes some good points but I really had to crawl through this article to decipher it’s meaning.
I keep dictionary.com open and when I come upon a word I don’t use and am not sure of I make a guess and then copy/paste it to get the definition. I treat it as an opportunity to expand my vocabulary.
I read two in a row yesterday which I had trouble with. I don’t know if it was me or the long, rambling sentences.
I don’t know what the writers’ convictions are in matters of faith and religion. I suppose one could use the term ‘myth’ to describe the evangelical view of Israel. I prefer ‘twisting the text’ to alter the meaning. When Christ God chastized Jerusalem as the killer of the prophets who rejected God’s care He said ‘your house is abandoned to you’, that doesn’t sound very much like chosen people to me. It also doesn’t sound like chosen people when St. Paul, in his letter to the Romans said the Jews were cursed. I could go on.
Maybe the biggest kick in the teeth, and what amounts to a real myth is that the majority in Israel may not be Semitic at all but are European converts to Judaism.
Removed. Please stick to the topic and your own views/comments not attacks on the author – which breaks the site rules. Mod
All the stuff about patriarchy and bourgeois values is beside the point. If someone wants to understand why American Evangelicals are so strongly Zionist, the place to begin is a study of John Darby and Cyrus Scofield, and why their doctrine has been so successful.
If someone wants to understand why American Evangelicals (and practically ALL Americans are ‘evangelicals’) are so strongly ‘Zionist’ the places to begin with are the places where the first ‘white’ colonists, the Puritans from England put their feet in search of the ‘New Zion’, the ‘New Israel’, the Plymouth Colony (1620) and the Massachusetts Bay Colony (1630).
The Puritan culture of New England was suffused with Jewish themes. No Christian community in history identified more with the Israelites of the Bible than did the first generations of settlers of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, who believed their own lives to be a literal reenactment of the biblical drama of the chosen people―they were the children of Israel and the ordinances of God’s Holy covenant by which they lived were His divine law. Since they viewed themselves as the persecuted victims of the sinful Christian establishment of the Old World (England), the Puritans also had a natural sympathy for the Jews of their own time. They considered themselves not only the symbolical, but the physical descendants of the ‘Hebrews’ (British Israelitism).
The influence of the ‘Hebrew Bible’ (not the Christian Scriptures) marks every step of the Puritan exodus to their Zion in the wilderness of the New World (colonization of America, of the Far West was couched in ‘conquest of Canaan’ terms and subjugation of the idolatrous colored people (be them red skinned ‘Injuns’ or ‘mestizos’, or ‘blacks’. The Jewish Bible formed their minds and dominated their characters; its conceptions were their conceptions from the very foundation of ‘America’. Their fight against the Church is ‘foundational’. They did not wait for Darby and Scofield. They are a product of ‘America’ of the rabidly anti-Christian ‘Founding Fathers’ (Jefferson, the ‘deist’ Franklin, John Adams and the Free-Mason Washington). Blaming their deep seated Zionism on Darby and Scofield (or on the “Jews’ for that matter), or on non-descript ‘bourgeois elites’ or ‘corporate’ bourgeois culture, the ‘white’ inhabitants of America (who decided that they are the ‘natives’ of the lands they stolen from the ‘colored’) slated to be ‘genocided’ by the ‘colored’, deceive themselves and try to deceive us (they don’t). For God’s sake, they put in power Trump and his coterie of messianic/apocalyptic Jews who think their sacred duty is to fight the ‘Antichrist Gog-Magog’ i.e. Russia!
Who is actually the ‘Elephant in the room’? Not only the GOP (whose mascot is the Elephant!). The ‘Asses’ are all on board, despite their ‘multicultural’ LGBTQ++… BS. It is ‘bipartisan’. It is ‘America’ as such and everything it stands for. Australia was unfortunately on board with it all the time, make no mistake mate.
Don’t you think it’s the height of impertinence to ask an author to DUMB DOWN a presentation to suit YOUR needs?
Well, the author does leave some points pretty unclear, IMO.
Trumps Deal of the Century is a travesty and an affront to all decent men and women.
Shame on all the so-called world leaders who look the other way, who bow to the USAs bullying and grovel before Israel.
This is a brilliant exposition about the current “State of Affairs”. I think that Robert Ruark { author of the book Uhuru } ; in answer to a question about the terrible situation in Africa at that time said that the situation in Africa was a ” “State of Affairs “. Ruark said that ” Problems ” would have Solutions”…..a State of Affairs; by it’s very nature… would not. In due course……{ after the Fire..or Flood .. or what ever other Catastrophe is visited on all of us } Humanity will start afresh…..that is ; if the First Cause sees fit to watch the antics of his Creation. I like the Author’s interesting Word Smithing.
The name of the guy who wrote on the topic of myth and mythology is Joseph Campbell, not John.
The biggest takeaway I got from his writing was that myth is not a false idea but rather an idea that is held to be true without proof by most of the members of a given culture.
One wonders what could possibly stop the US/Israel Borg from continuing their rampage.
How do wars always start? Human beings (VIP politicians and military commanders) of a nation order other human beings (soldiers) in that nation to attack other human beings living in other nations by imposing sanctions, pulling triggers, or pushing launch buttons. What will prevent/deter those VIPs and commanders from issuing those orders is, in this age of nuclear weapons, literally the most important question in the world.
The people of the former Soviet Union knew, and the people of the Russian Federation today, remember or are taught what real war in large cities was like during the USSR’s existential struggle against Germany — in historical terms, an event that occurred relatively recently. It is obvious to anyone who has one functioning brain cell that the Russian military is truly defensive. In other words, it exists to prevent being attacked. The logic is that these weapons will inflict great damage or destroy the capabilities of any attackers on their own territory — for example, having their major cities leveled, shortly after which radioactive fallout spreads over large downwind parts of their nation and population, all to catastrophic effect.
Unfortunately, this strategy of, essentially, MAD assumes that the VIP brains of the attacking nation fully understand, appreciate and, most importantly (as Dr. Strangelove put it), FEAR!! the consequences of their attack. The fact of the matter is that US VIP politicians and, for that matter, the US populace have had no similar “homeland” experience during wars that only occurred “over there”. Plenty of US soldiers died over there, but not in the homeland’s cities, etc.
IMO as a result of this fact of history, Mr. Conroy asks the increasingly obvious, unavoidable question. “Do Americans and Israelis believe that only they can achieve emancipation per acquisition of other people’s assets? They both like to think that it is their God-given right to own the countries they occupy. The shocker is that this is not rhetorical question! Even more shocking is that I know that the answer is “yes” and that answer is no longer the answer given by just the Elite. It is IMO the answer from an increasing majority of 24/7-propagandized citizens of those nations. Let that truly sink in. I would even expand Mr. Conroy’s question to “do the US and Israel think that they have the right to own the world?” I think that the answer is the same.
Again, what event is going to have to take place that will stop the US and Israel in their tracks? I think that the answer is that, unfortunately, they are both going to have to get a taste of the real wars that they’ve been dishing out to other nations, by having it served to them on their very own Main Streets and neighborhoods.
In the present situation of rapidly increasing US/Israeli aggression, I hope that Mr. Putin’s gentlemanly public demeanor does not extend to private conversations/negotiations with other heads of state. In order to martial US domestic public opposition to continuing US aggression, Mr. Putin might want to seriously consider addressing the UN General Assembly with some “red lines” that the US and Israel must not cross and some highly detailed “what we’re going to do to your most important cities if you don’t stop what you’re doing” kind of language that just may scare some people into some anti-war activism. IMO, RT and Sputnik are not enough, not by a long shot.
The present behavior of the US and Israel must somehow be stopped before the nations they are oppressing commit non-nuclear responses that the US will respond to with nuclear weapons. I hope that Mr. Putin realizes that that gangster-like behavior will (in fact must) eventually lead to an attack on Russia.
I completely agree. Or, pretty much completely.
The part that I am not sure about is the what extent mainstream Americans really think that the USA has the right to own the world. It is possible that they truly do not want more war—that sentiment took both Obama and Trump to the White House. But a kind of schizophrenia is possible whereby mainstream Americans simultaneously don’t want more war but unconsciously think that somehow the USA does have the right to own the whole world, one way or another, or at the very least tell other countries what to do, boss and bully them, etc. Perhaps not via “war” as they imagine it. But because they accept unquestioningly that our “way of life” is obviously the way of life that the whole world should accept and imitate. It doesn’t help that so many facets of the American “way of life” have sunk roots into foreign cultures and tendrils to strangulate them. Still, perhaps what we think of as the American “way of life” is actually just a modern way of life that coexists with deeper cultural expressions. Maybe all we have int he USA is this American modernism and nothing else to temper it.
But to return to the main point, I think it is worth a try for Putin or someone to keep repeating the warnings (“Do you see what you have done?”). Once is not enough for any learning to take hold. It must be repeated.. Thus, I feel that many other foreign leaders must take it upon themselves to warn the USA and the world that there are red lines and here is what happens if they are crossed.
Here is where a *realistic* Hollywood blockbuster might actually get through to people.
Katherine
Here’s what’s going on tonight in the bowels of the pentagon. What’s going to deter the generals? Who’s going to present an argument that will convince Trump not to strike Russia — Pompeo?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXZF6DwKvCI
Mainstream America was taught “Manifest Destiny” as a child I was taught it was ‘manifest’ into itself, it was just a fact that white-anglo man was to have all of the Western Hemisphere, later they applied Manifest to the entire earth
Growing up we were told that “All the oil on earth belonged to us”
We were told that we used 90% of the earth’s resources, and paid the lowest price on earth, then it was 25 cents a gallon for gas.
Everybody prospered upon raping and pillaging the earth, but we were the ‘good guys’. That the only ‘good commie’ was a dead commie. That inside of every Vietnamese was an American trying to get out of that Asian body, that everybody on earth wanted to be ‘us’, e.g. anglo-saxon
We were told that “Israel” was just a ‘proxy’ a foot-hold in MENA for us, a protect that would watch over ‘our oil’.
Of course today ‘manifest destiny’ is hollow doubt if its even taught anymore, as today everything is expensive, and a kid can’t buy a car for $100 USD, and fill the tank for 5 bucks. Forty years ago you could work any job, say pump-gas, make $200/week, and live really good.
Today the majority of the american public no longer participate in the rape and pillage of the world, today there is a new narrative, the private-merc soldier well paid.
It’s a New World Order for American’s
“The part that I am not sure about is the what extent mainstream Americans really think that the USA has the right to own the world. It is possible that they truly do not want more war—that sentiment took both Obama and Trump to the White House. But a kind of schizophrenia is possible whereby mainstream Americans simultaneously don’t want more war but unconsciously think that somehow the USA does have the right to own the whole world, one way or another, or at the very least tell other countries what to do, boss and bully them, etc. Perhaps not via “war” as they imagine it. But because they accept unquestioningly that our “way of life” is obviously the way of life that the whole world should accept and imitate.”
War is just a means to an end–a tool to wield to achieve a certain goal.
That goal for America is world domination.
While some Americans may “oppose” war for self-serving reasons that it will cost the USA too much in blood and treasure, Americans in general largely support and believe in the USA’s Manifest Destiny to rule the entire planet.
After all, the USA is an Indispensable nation and Exceptionalist people–who were chosen by God as the Shining City on a Hill.
An increasing number of us Americans are seeing the folly of us being the hegemon, the world’s policeman. That idea flourished under GW Bush from maybe 2001 until 2009 (?), then it became clear it was a grand ruse, and we let go of it. We voted Trump in to END the ME wars and placement of troops all over the globe.
I agree with you. The Americans have never been attacked, bombed, and their country destroyed. They were never in a position to defend their lives in their own country, on their soil. That is the reason they don’t stop occupying other countries. Humans are firstly human animals. They learn by experience, and later they develop theories to try to make sense of their actions. We live in a real, often harsh world where we compete with other humans, and that shapes our actions. If we have extra time, then we have time for making abstractions and ideas about our world. Also, there 2 types of modern humans (simplified): narcissists, and empathetic people. The first are for competition, the other type is for collaboration. I think that collaboration developed later. And that collaboration is what can prevent us to auto destruct, and to destroy the planet. About myths, and religions; the older religions are today called mythologies, and that is not fair. The older religions connected humans with nature. The Abrahamic religions extracted the human from nature. There is only one God, and a man (woman is not that important in these religions).
Denis writes sarcastically that “..surely there must exist somewhere in their bible a text that says that God gave the entire world to them?”
Do the other Jewish sacred texts go that far? In Leviticus 25:23 God warns that the land, including that given his people, cannot be kept in perpetuity; that the land is His and He states the great idea that “we are just sojourners upon it”
Sometimes you just need to whomp ’em up side of the head (as we used to say at alma mater). Speaking of Palestinians as being the whompors and Hegemon being the whompees, necessary but not feasible at this time.
Resolution requires eviction of Hegemon from Iraq first, then Syria, then the program for Greater Palestine can resume, compleat with whatever financial pressure works.
So, the whomping I prescribe would be self inflicted by Hegemon upon Hegemon as it slowly dawns on them they are no longer relevant.
The author states:
“The alliance between America and Zionist Israel is based on religious mythology. Religious mythology, unlike secular mythology (or unreligious stories) tends to be male oriented and its iterations tend toward defending a patriarchal or tribal premise. In the Jewish context, it is primal to the point of loathing the concept of miscegenation…a threatening concept that stubbornly repeats itself in religious myths…and much written about in the Old Testament. It appears that Jewish religious mythology brought forth a phobic fear of emasculation that has now taken a turn for the worse in our modern era. A new iteration involving assets and concomitant devises is expressing itself in a most retrograde fashion…is phobia becoming viral, we need to ask ourselves?
In Zionist Israel, a new milieu has come into existence to launch tribalism into a secondary phase of identity politics. A phase shaped by religious mythology implying something strange and undemocratic. If you are not Jewish, then you are of a lesser stripe…or, of no worth at all!”
Hmm, the title of the piece is
“Miscegenation as elephant in the room.”
The author actually says little about that. Instead, from this passage it sounds as though misogyny is the actual elephant in the room. The author jumps from miscegenation to misogyny to “tribalism” without transitions or explanations of how these ideas fit together.
The last quoted sentence also leaves me scratching my head, namely:
“In Zionist Israel, a new milieu has come into existence to launch tribalism into a secondary phase of identity politics. A phase shaped by religious mythology implying something strange and undemocratic. If you are not Jewish, then you are of a lesser stripe…or, of no worth at all!”
This tribalism and the conviction of tribal superiority has always been a cornerstone of Judaism. Israel Shahak and others have provide copious documentation of this conviction in Jewish foundational texts—it such was needed. Judaism and Zionism both rest as “evidence” of their truth and legal rights on religious mythology—that is, a fairy tale, a tribal creation myth. That the Jews have gotten everyone to buy into and accept their Jewish creation myth and its logical consequences in contemporary geopolitics is incredible. They have done it largely by creating, via movies and other media, new myths that state and elaborate on new mythical relationships and scenarios between their tribe and Gentiles. Anyone who questions *any* of this—the actual myths/stories themselves and the motivations behind the full-court mythmaking press—is now legally labeled antisemitic.
Therefore, I fail to understand what the author is actually saying in his last quoted sentence when he notes that all of this is new. It is all as old as the hills. Now that they have their own state the Jews are quickly morphing into one might call a “cultic state”—“state” in both concrete and figurative senses. The USA govt is supporting them in this retrogression. An established republic, the USA, is itself regressing to an earlier tribal state of government under the sway of a foreign Jewish tribal leader. It is as though the Mongol hordes were the tutors of the Chinese in government, instead of what actually occurred.
I do think miscegenation and misogyny are related in complex ways.
Perhaps the author can expand on these themes he introduces.
Katherine
All the clap-trap against ‘paternalism’ cum misogyny is the denial of Christ, the Son of ‘Our Father who are in Heaven’. Feminism with all its ‘goddesses’ is a form of apostasy.
Katherine
Gives herself the licence to ‘fit’ miscegenation and misogyny…two very different concepts…into an interchangeable frame, then states that I am doing that. Where, of where exactly does that happen?
Denis A. Conroy
“Gives herself the licence to ‘fit’ miscegenation and misogyny…two very different concepts…into an interchangeable frame,”
Wrong.
I did NOT say miscegenation and misogyny are interchangeable. On the contrary. Or “fit them into a frame,” whatever that means.
I said: You do not really write about miscegenation in your piece, despite the title.
I said: You slide from a brief mention of fear of miscegenation into fear of emasculation, without saying how these “fit” together. Fear of emasculation sounds to me like an indication of misogyny. Perhaps the point is the that miscegenation has come about because a man has slept with a non-Jewish woman. And this would make him fear emasculation? Is that the point? The connection between miscegenation and fear of emasculatoin? Fear of non-Jewish women?
Katherine
Denis thanks for the article.Your mastery at eloquence, and display of maturity/ growth as a human being is impressive. However this time, as I read,a hope arose in me that you may be able to assist me in finding an answer to a question I’ v tried to solve for a long time. The question is; Sir, “When and how did the European masses loose the Collective Right to Land Use to the concept of selective Ownership of land by the elites (1%) in the form of title deeds” ?
@Jika,
If I may and the answer to your question I do not have fully however, I do have a perspective which may or may not help.
After visiting family in Slovenia early 1990’s I was mystified as to the strange way land was parcelled out among the people of the village where my family came from. They were all land owners with everyone owning numerous parcels all over the place. I couldn’t fathom coming from Canada how this could be. It was like a large checkerboard with families all owning a square here and there. To get to one of your parcels one had to literally drive into a neighbours driveway and go through their property to get to ones parcel for harvesting the hay and such? Another cousin has a home but his farmland sits right across the street from their house and owns more in other places etc etc. His neighbor well his land is next to my cousins house but his house sits across the street. Who does this I thought too myself, the city planners must be nuts? I found it very strange why this was so? Unlike here in Canada one buys and owns a piece and that’s that with title deed. A family member noticed my confusion and asked me what was up and I explained to him my mystification at it all? He asked his mother my aunt about this and her reply was simple. After the war when people returned to their villages and lives everything was so destroyed that even civic authorities had no idea where ones property began and where ones end. The people then simply got together and from memory decided and parcelled out to each other what they thought best. No government authority was originally involved and no real paperwork was assigned civically or otherwise. It was just people trying to survive and live and why in some communities villages there isn’t even a process for public utilities and water plumbing of houses. My Mom even showed me what she had to do for water how far to walk to a stream and carry it back to the house. Another cousin too told me how before the war they were large landowners but because the land was in a valuable place in a village that now became a major town the communists simply expropriated it paying him nothing really and the bitterness of losing it well you could see it in his eyes and emotions? His title deed meant nothing as it was simply his word that the property was in his family for generations but who really knows I think now as I look back.
My suspicions about your ‘concept of selective ownership by the elites’ has many reasons not the least of which may be to bring some order to a confusion created by years of mismanagement and war.
Looking back if I were to ask my cousins about their title deeds my guess is they wouldn’t even know where to begin really. As for me wow I think too myself if I were to gain what they have by purchasing such land ownership here in Canada well I couldn’t do it period. It would take millions of dollars to do. That one cousin who lost to the authorities his land he still has 1700 apple trees and vineyards galore? As I told him if he had in Canada what he had over there he would be worth too much money? He works and sweats hard though. I guess that’s the reason why too many woman are widows? Lastly, the desire among everyone to have their own wine is incredible. It’s almost like a status symbol ones grows and makes their own wine?
In Canada no one owns any land, all land belongs to the Queen of England. No officer of any Court in Canada when appointed or elected swears an oath to Canada and it’s Peoples. In Canada all elected/appointed officials swear an Oath Of Aligience to the ‘Queen of England’ (‘ ‘that should be in all caps). Should one be lucky enough to ‘think’ they own some land in Canada, I suggest reading over your Land Title Document. On it you will find that you are listed as the ‘Tennant’ or ‘Co Tennant’ should you have a SO, but not ‘The Owner.’ Sementics? Fail to pay your Land Rates/Land Taxes and the Crown will sell your property to the highest bidder. Canada is a joke, won’t, or never will be a soverign country until Chief Willy Chavez is President; not lap dog poddle Prime Minister.
@ sean the leprechaun
Yeah, the British and her Monarchy they got it all figured out. What began in the beginning as homesteading the bankers were able to extract complete and total oversight over land use for her and/or their Monarchy. Poor native Indians were they unprepared for the lawyers or what?
Getting back to Slovenia I can only reiterate the oddness I felt about what I saw and experienced and I can only add if one of my cousins desired to sell his land how would the purchaser proceed? Especially if he had to go to a bank for the money? The paperwork would not only be non existent but to begin a paper trail would be mindboggling if not impossible. Who would determine what, how and when? Further Slovenian like the whole of Yugoslavia money was practically worthless outside the country at that time?
Barter it away I guess would be one solution until what the British showed up with their lawyers to show how it is supposed to be done and take their cut accordingly?
Having owned vast amounts of Real Estate in the USA
I can tell you
That ‘owning’ real estate in the USA, just means the right to pay taxes, to the local gov, as they wish.
Most notable is that Jewish leader’s have had the good sense to designate their estates, homes, and lands as ‘Historical’, thus like the “Church”, they pay little to no tax.
Mortals, aka non-tribal god’s chosen, they pay the full price. In most places in USA, if you fail to pay that years property-tax, within that year your land/home will be sold to the Jews at the price of the taxes due, thus the the Jews constantly control the ebb&flow of land turned over back to them to be resold to the Goy.
It really works like this virtually everywhere in the USA, even the smallest most remote Idaho township. I remember years ago talking to a new Jewish neighbor had just moved in next to me, he told me that the most highest honor would be to move into some remote local area, take-over the political machine and make a killing. He was quite proud of himself. I had alway’s lived in the West coast of the USA, and had no idea of the East Coast point of view.
Even simple things like ‘rent control’, they apply rent-control to the GOY apartments, but never the Jew apartments, in a short time the GOY loses his investment, as he can’t pay taxes for the lack of cash-flow, then when the Jew buys his property, the ‘rent-control’ magically goes away.
The highest honor is thing called over-lay, like Gerymandering, its where the GOV draws and/or designates areas around the State, or within city as ‘environmental’ which means you can’t have ‘structure’ that can be a stick in the ground. Once the ‘overlay’ is in place the land/home has no value, thus the owner in time walks away or sells at a discount, then the Jew in the land office ( usually a lawyer ), magically overlays that land to non-environmental, and like magic again the new Jew owner makes 10X or more on his investment.
God bless America, the best place on earth for the Jew to fleece the Goy.
Lastly, I dumped sold all my property’s years ago, now I’m a happy vagabond who owns nothing. Like they say in Greece, “You USA people think you have something, but you have nothing, we Greeks have nothing, but we know what we have”.
-Trump, it must be said, is just one more presidential enabler doing it for Zionist Israel.
Basically a misunderstanding.
What happened to the $21 trillion missing on US budget?
Conroy cannot answer. It is unthinkable Israel would “give away” what is rightfully their money – if we follow Conroy’s logic about Trump working for israel.
That would never happen. Anyone who believes a broke state like Israel would give away $21 trillion to some other – don’t know Israelis.
I.e. Israel never got the $21 trillion -> some other is running the show.
Very good and insightful analysis. Two settler nations using religious zealotry to justify invasion and occupation. The chosen ones above any laws be they constitutional or international. However, the invaders are being met with a formidable resistance on the front lines ( Iran missile attack on US base in Iraq ). Syria taking back their country from the terrorists and the US and Turkish troops supporting the terrorists. Yemen/Houthi success in pushing SA out of Yemen. This in addition to resistance at home to the wars and regime change. People are questioning the narrative. Questioning the legality and morality. Questioning the cost: tax dollars and blood. Questioning the loyalty to the Zionist regime. To date there is not a well organized peace movement in America, but IMO, more and more, people are becoming empathetic to the resistance. They are growing sick and tired of the Outlaw US Empire.
I’ve read this because I was intrigued by the brilliant collection of long words (miscegenation, serendipity, nonchalant and so on…) It is articles like this that allow us indigenous people to improve our English ;)
You remind of the Indian fellow I was talking to last week, they hate the English, but pride themselves with being able to communicate in the most eloquent of English. Strange; as an oppressed (tounge in cheek) Irish paddy I take great pride in ballocksing the English language whenever possible. That smilly face thing though, perhaps you jest. Good, if so.
I had to look up “ballocksing” in the dictionary – so I have to thank you as well for helping me improve my English :)
I’m Russian so I guess I’m also from an (economically) oppressed nation but you’re right, I’m strangely enchanted by the English language despite the UK and the US being our enemies for a long time (even though being our allies in some world wars). We’ve been brought up with love of the English (and American) literature – A.A. Milne, Lewis Carroll, Jonathan Swift (speaking about Ireland); O’Henry, Mark Twain, James Fenimore Cooper etc.
1.miscere and genus
2.serendipity coined by an Englishman
3. chalant is a French word
The author makes the following very common claim
“A beautiful country exposed to collusion and perfidy at the hands of Anglo-Zionist whose intentions all along were to devour Palestine. The duplicitous process that commenced in 1917”
However that dating isnt true at all.
It would be closer to the truth to date it to 1840 and to connect it with Shaftesbury and Palmerston.
Balfours declaration was what the British elites really wanted to do but it was essential to deceive the rest of the world about that since Britain needed the jews to be seen as a separate power, not as a Britains proxy.
I can imagine that there has been a subset of the british elites who have been sincerely critical about the Israel-project along the way and some of them have later been assassinated no doubt.
But the british elites are not very open about such things.
They are welladapted to play deceptive roles in the interest of the empire..
So which ones of them who were sincerely critical and which ones just feigned it is hard to tell.
Having nonwitting partners in a conspiracy may be an advantage while only an inner ring of insiders have the need to know.
From Palmerstons era and until the Balfour declaration, Britains dominating role in banking became more and more challenged. And preventing jewish assimilation became an important aim for Britain to avoid loosing the dominance in banking to Germany and other rivals.
“And preventing jewish assimilation became an important aim for Britain to avoid loosing the dominance in banking to Germany and other rivals.”
I don’t understand this sentence.
Katherine
If the jews had been left unhindered by Britains maneuvers on the continent, including the encouragement of antijewish currents and zionism and revolutions, the german jews would in all likeliness have become assimilated in Germany.
Therefore, anticipating Germany’s economic rise, there would be nothing to prevent Germany from collaborating with the leading bankers and presumably the Reichsmark would have competed successfully with the pound.
That would have removed Britains free lunch favour of having a quasi monopoly.
And it isnt just about a money monopoly.
I have seen mentioned that The City of London represents something like the worlds center for raw materials companies.
And seeks cartels for everything no doubt.
But there is then no room for competion.
Rivals have to be kept down. Pitted against each other.
The british navy and their other military used to be the means and later the US was coopted with the Rhodes scholars who induced the Carnegie foundation to define the best option for the US to be war in 1909.
This was just one of several british preparations for WWI.
Now Britains actions during more than a century contains a multitude of individual actions and manipulations which contributed to see the jews radicalised, corralled into zionism and migrating westwards where the British elites could more easily exploit them in a proxy role.
What happened therefore meant that assimilation on the continent was prevented.
But apparently that wasnt enough, for Houston Chamberlain, who spent his career lecturing the Germans about the jewish problem, actually was quite explicit about it telling the germans to forbid jewish assimilation.
It is characteristic that all anglosaxons I have encountered writing about the Balfour declaration never bring up this Chamberlain figure.
Both his brother and his younger cousin Neville were involved with the axis powers and we may assume that nothing he did happened by chance.
Those anglosaxons also consistently avoid mentioning most of the essentials of the Palmerston era.
Notable exeptions are Lyndon Larouche and some of his associates, who have exposed many of the salient facts.
But with the exception of the Larouche circle I suggest that the many anglosaxons who write about it cannot possibly all be so ignorant as it seems.
It must be deliberate in at least some cases.
So they are peddling anglosaxon propaganda aimed at continued polarisation between the jews and the rivals of the anglosaxon empire.
By hiding the circumstance that the jews are not a separate power but one in symbiosis with the anglosaxon elites.
And those anglosaxon elites benefit from this confusing connection and like it to remain covered up.
If the jews were friends with the rivals of the empire they would no longer be so easy to exploit.
Therefore the jews are in the odd situation that they are rewarded by the anglosaxons for being difficult to deal with, and to be less directed towards allying themselves with parties independent of the US/UK etc.
Israel was meant to be a colonial bridgehead for the british empire.
Not a civilised partner intent on mutual benefits.
While the anglosaxon elites like it to remain that way.
And the greatest numerary of enthusiastic supporters are evangelical christians in the US.