Dear friends,
Here are the two files which I promised to make available for download:
http://www11.zippyshare.com/v/79111768/file.html
http://www11.zippyshare.com/v/648054/file.html
Hope this helps. Let me know if you have a problem with these.
Kind regards,
The Saker
PS: thanks to davidius for recommending Zippyshare!
PPS: As an alternative to Zippyshare here are some Medifire links:
http://www.mediafire.com/view/agvdb74jb4qx6cy/How_I_became_a_dedicated_9-11_Truther.pdf
http://www.mediafire.com/view/hcrnq80uync86in/Left-Leaning_Despisers_of_the_9-11_Truth_Movement.pdf
Good links Saker. My AVG malware says that these are threats.
davidius
Avast is a pain in the ass. I have it on one computer and the same warning turns up all the time even then I know there are no problems. I have used zipy for years. No such problems with Kaspersky and the other virus program I use. Not on the same computers thou. That wouldn’t work.
davidius
this is a part taken from Pepe Escobar at Asia Time Online Sep 12, 2012
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/NI12Dj02.html
We all remember the mujahideen in the photo side-by-side with Ronald Reagan; they were cherished as “freedom fighters”. Blowback was inevitable in Afghanistan – as it will be in Libya and northern Africa, and Syria and the Middle East.
Meanwhile, all those myriad questions will remain unanswered. Among them:
Why “Geronimo” was never formally indicted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation as responsible for 9/11? How could the alleged 19 Muslim perpetrators have been identified in less than 72 hours – without even a crime-scene investigation?
Who pocketed the eight indestructible black boxes on those four 9/11 flights? How easy was it for all those elaborate Pentagon defense systems to be disabled? Why was the DC Air National Guard in Washington AWOL?
How come a huge number of reputed architects and engineers are adamant that the official narrative simply does not explain the largest structural collapse in recorded history (the Twin Towers) as well as the collapse of WTC building 7, which was not even hit by a jet?
Why did New York mayor Rudolph Giuliani instantly authorize the shipment of WTC rubble to China and India for recycling?
Why was metallic debris found no less than eight miles from the crash site of the plane that went down in Pennsylvania – suggesting the plane may have been shot down under Dick Cheney’s orders?
Who inside the Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) transferred US$100,000 to Mohammed Atta in the summer of 2001 – under orders of ISI head Lt Gen Ahmad himself, as Indian intelligence insists? Was it really ISI asset Omar Sheikh, Osama bin Laden’s information technology specialist who later organized the slaying of journalist Daniel Pearl in Karachi? Was Pakistani intelligence directly involved in 9/11?
And was “Geronimo” admitted at the American hospital in Dubai on July 4, 2001, after flying from Quetta, Pakistan, and staying for treatment until July 11? We will never know. And “Geronimo” isn’t talking. What we do know is that cyber-capital creates the future; the “war on terror” was – is – a monumental scam; and Washington elites couldn’t care less about a bunch of “towel heads”; it’s the Middle Kingdom that fills them with dread.
Links don’t work for me. Maybe my firewall and antivirus is protecting me.
here’s some off the grid speculation from a learned man.
Thanks Saker, for posting these links.
9/11 is very important since it serves as a litmus test – if one cannot entertain a scenario different from the government’s conspiracy of miraculous coincidences, one will be blind to pretty much everything else happening in today’s upside down world. For them the Kool-Aid tastes pretty good!
Of course if three large steel-framed buildings (the only ones in history) had collapsed due to fire, there would have been a scramble to change building codes world wide. That has not happened as far as I know (I am not an architect, but I am a licensed engineer, and have seen nothing in the engineering journals)
Naturally many in the professional community of architects and engineers are reluctant to publicly oppose the government for obvious reasons. While it is true that some are constrained by cognitive dissonance, down deep many others know but will not speak.
By the way the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth will be at the upcoming American Institute of Architects meeting in Chicago:
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/875-ae911truth-relentless-on-the-american-institute-of-architects.html
John
I don’t understand why Saker chose to enlarge upon this subject at this particular time. There is a huge news blackout on the Donbass, and correspondingly an enormous need for Russian-speakers to tell us what is happening there, and yet the attempt to gather reports from Donbass that I would expect to see here, that I would come here looking for based on everything Saker has attempted to do previously, just isn’t happening.
I suppose the news blackout in the MSM is based on a Kiev-supporting desire to keep quiet while the most holy vote is going on. But we here represent a contingent that doesn’t recognise the vote, or the Kiev government that is staging it, and hence has no reason to honour any such concept of keeping quiet during the voting. Yet no-one has so far found anything newsworthy about the situation in Slavyansk, for instance. No-one has got anything to say about it, not Bot Tak, not Crazy Ivan,nobody. Why?
Anna news’ replacement youtube account has just been suspended, like their original one. This is full-blown imperial censorship operating with high speed and efficiency. But still, what about all the blogs?
It appears that the Junta has just “replaced” the vote counting software for the coming “election.” How convenient!
http://rt.com/news/161332-ukraine-president-election-virus/
I’m a mechanical engineer and right from the start, I found the official story about 9-11 odd, for various reasons relating to the behaviour of physical materials. However, to jump from reality based evidence to stories of nuclear weapons makes the people who are seeking the truth about these events pass for oddballs and stupid, so PLEASE STOP WITH THE ABSURD THEORIES. Thank you.
Speaking of Left leaning 9/11 truth movement despisers, I’ll never forget a few years ago, Rachel Maddow waving around a copy of Popular Mechanic and ferociously claiming they “proved” the official version of the tower collapses, and going on a rant about conspiracy theorists being the greatest threat to democracy at this time in history, how they’re all big right wing plots to subvert rational thought and undermine Obama and the saintly democrats, just about foaming at the mouth I’m her for of pique. I’ve absolutely hated her since that day. During Bush I used to love her, I know, I was a neophyte back then. From Chuck D’s sidekick to MSM gatekeeper in just a few short years. I have to say, going back to that day, I remember all my friends tripping out over how despondent I was, and it wasn’t all because of the tragedy of the attacks. They didn’t get it, I told them. This is it. Nothing will ever be the same, it’s war from here on out. I didn’t know how bad it would be with the GWOT and the attack on civil liberties and all, but good Lord how I wished I was wrong. You could say nothing really changed, out was just more of the same at an accelerated pace, but still, it did change a lot, most of all in the American psyche. I always wonder where we’d be if that hadn’t happened. Not like it would be pave on earth, but who knows, and really, they’re not much point in even going there. So I’ll stop.
Rowan Berkeley said…
“I don’t understand why Saker chose to enlarge upon this subject at this particular time. There is a huge news blackout on the Donbass, and correspondingly an enormous need for Russian-speakers to tell us what is happening there, and yet the attempt to gather reports from Donbass that I “
If you and others are interested in new information from the South-Eastern Ukraine besides Sakers update. They also have their own TV pogram that is informative. We must support these people.
I recommend these facebook pages:
https://www.facebook.com/TruthfromUkraine
https://www.facebook.com/southfronteng
https://www.facebook.com/DonbassRevolution
https://www.facebook.com/pages/BERKUT-Ukraine/574477605978934
This just in! Willy Wonka wins Ukrainian presidential election! New baby-faced doofus chosen to run the latest incarnation of Galician Banana Republic!
If anyone can,the Candy man Can.
KIEV, May 25. /ITAR-TASS/. Petro Poroshenko, a business tycoon and member of Ukraine’s parliament, is winning the presidential elections in Ukraine with 55.9% of the vote, according to exit poll data.
His closest rival, Yulia Tymoshenko, the leader of the Batkivshchyna (Fatherland) party, is scoring 12.9% of the vote. Third comes Oleh Lyashko (8%); Anatoly Grytsenko gained 6.3%; Serhiy Tihipko has 4.7%. Mykhailo Dobkin scored 2.1% of the votes. Petro Symonenko has 1.1%. Ultra-radicals Oleh Tyahnybok scored 1.3% and Dmytro Yarosh — 0.9% of votes.
The exit poll was conducted by three big sociological centers, the Ilk Kucheriv Democratic Initiatives foundation, the Kiev International Institute of Sociology, and the Alexander Razumkov Ukrainian Center for Economic and Political Research.
[url=http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=66e_1401030004]Chechens in Donetsk, 25-05-14[/url]
lots of armed characters in these videos from Donetsk.
Poroshenko will never recognise ‘Crimea occupation’
Last updated Sun 25 May 2014
Ukraine’s Petro Poroshenko, set to be the new president after today’s election, said he would never recognise Russia’s “occupation of Crimea” and ruled out negotiating with separatists.
Petro Poroshenko took a hard line on Ukraine’s relations with Russia. Credit: Reuters
Asked about relations with Russia, he said the “sovereignty and territorial integrity” of Ukraine were paramount for him.
The confectionery tycoon also ruled out negotiations with pro-Russian separatists in the east of the country until they put down their weapons.
meanwhile in down towin Kiev,
Klitschko winning elections of Kiev mayor — exit polls
His closest rival, parliament member Lesya Orobets, scored 10.3% of the vote
Right, nice to get back to reality, thanks anon, whichever anon you be.
Now I and the other people at MoA are trying to make sense of the Chechens in Ukraine. We have the already slightly weird context that Kadyrov apparently mediated the release of the two LifeNews journalists (I suspect that the Russian govt paid a bloody great bribe, because Kiev is strangely responsive to money, as they proved by releasing another Russian journo for $13k today) – but anyway, there is a clip of what claims to be a group of Chechens fighting alongside the Vostok Battalion, which is anti-Kiev. We have one guy who calls himself Vietnam Vet (maybe he comes here too), who is seriously worried by this. He says:
“If Chechens are indeed fighting alongside the Separatists it explains the expertise of the ambushers who wiped out the Ukraine Army checkpoint. There is a small minority of men who can survive war and return again and again for the adrenaline high. If you are getting paid to kill the infidel, that is a real plus. Their paymasters must be neocons/neolibs who want a civil war on Russia’s border to destabilize it. The Separatists need all the fighters they can get to protect themselves from the Right Sector goons, but allowing Muslim Chechens to fight in their war is like the frog carrying a scorpion across the river on its back. It is in the scorpion’s nature to bite and doom both of them.”
I find it difficult to believe that Chechens are good news in Ukraine, whatever side they appear to be on. What do you all think, please? And by the way, is Chechen “Kavkazi” in Russian? because I am hearing that word on other videos too.
@Rowan Berkley,
Regarding Chechens in Ukraine fighting for the Russian anti-Kiev forces. These guys could very likely be pro-Moscow members of Ramzan khadirov’s clan alliance: the people who are sworn enemies of the West (because so many their clan were murdered by the Salafist surrogates of the UK/Saudi Arabia sponsored Chechen terrorist movement).
So I would hold back on making any judgements until we know more about these guys: also note Mr. Khadirov was involved in freeing the Russian journalists from their Kiev kidnappers, so a pro-Moscow Chechen connection seems to be in play.
Did anyone see or hear anything about the Kiev junta launching a lawsuit of their own against Ahmetov? Or did I hallucinate that? I thought I saw something, and I assumed it was along the lines of: accuse him of embezzlement, confiscate all his wealth, or all they can get their hands on, and knock him out of the game. That would be ironic and interesting, because obviously the oligarchs in the east will fight like cats in a sack.
From a comment over at Zerohedge:
“Martin Armstrong is reporting Putin is leaking evidence on us gov involvement in 911. “
?????
No link. I’ll see if I can find one.
Okay, here is some more meat to add to the 911 stew. Most of the 911 speculation I have seen has no explanation for the anomalous evidence that disproves everything from a crash and burn collapse, to a controlled demolition implosion, or even a mini-nuke destroying those structures.
1. The combined weight of the those twin towers was over 2 million tons. Yet when the “collapse” happened there was no seismic record of any thud hitting the bed rock foundation on which the twin towers were built.
2. The structures were built below the water level of the Hudson River and yet the dike around the foundation remained intact with no flooding to the power lines or subway tunnels that led into the WTC complex or the rest of lower Manhattan Island.
3. The structures disappeared and appeared to fall at slightly faster than free fall speed meaning that there couldn’t have been anything (like building debris) blocking their descent.
4. The pile of debris left was not consistent with how much “stuff” would have remained from two hundred plus story buildings had they “collapsed”.
The following video gives a frank and eye-opening discussion of these and other evidence from that day:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yri3ZSVjjnA
Will ‘Chocolate King’ Poroshenko claims victory in Ukraine presidential poll shed light om how the Millibands are going to rule Britain?
So, the elections will be what they will be, Count Chocula will likely win… But then what?
Are there any planned actions for the Rada post-election, like a constitutional convention of some sort, any kind of significant action, really, that will happen in all likelihood regardless of the outcome, and assuming total chaos isn’t engulfing the entire country?
@ Gayle
re leaks on 9/11 –
google Martin Armstrong blog –
https://www.google.com/search?q=martin+armstrong+blog&oq=Mart&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j69i59j0l4.3283j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8
Hi Crone, yeah, that’s based on a Youtube video that was posted on September ’13. So… not really anything that I’d term newsworthy ;-)
German paratroopers ready to join Donbass people in their fight:
http://rusvesna.su/english/1401056501
Pace Rowan Berkeley, this is a 9/11 thread (though, of course, not exclusively).
Colinjames mentioned “Rachel Maddow waving around a copy of Popular Mechanics and ferociously claiming they ‘proved’ the official version of the tower collapses”. The Popular Mechanics article, purporting to “Debunk the 9/11 Myths” has itself been debunked in Reply to Popular Mechanics re 9/11.
Poet said: “The combined weight of the those twin towers was over 2 million tons. Yet when the ‘collapse’ happened there was no seismic record of any thud hitting the bed rock foundation on which the twin towers were built.” This is not true. See Seismic Evidence Points to Underground Explosions Causing WTC Collapse.
Some people don’t have the intellectual ability to distinguish between (a) proving that the official 9/11 story about the collapse of the Twin Towers is false and (b) demonstrating how that collapse actually happened. A favourite tactic of 9/11 trolls is to claim that the official story of the collapse (although in fact there is no official story except that “the plane impacts and the fires did it, somehow”) must be accepted unless it can be proven that explosives (or whatever) were used to demolish the Twin Towers. A moment’s reflection will show that this is not so. Anyone (including the lying 9/11 trolls themselves) who has looked at the evidence can see that the official story is impossible, even though we (or rather, most of us) don’t know exactly how the towers were destroyed. Since the official story cannot be true, the obvious question is: How were the towers destroyed? Any answer will inevitably show that it wasn’t done by 19 Arab ‘terrists’, and that it could only have been done either by US or Israeli planners and agents (probably both, working together).
This has vast implications for the question of the degree to which citizens of the U.S. should continue to provide active and passive support (if not ‘loyalty’) to their government, implications which very few of those citizens wish to consider, generally preferring just to forget the whole damn thing and to pretend that 9/11 is now ancient history, of no relevance to anything.
Most of the particulars of 9/11 are now of only academic interest. The official narrative has long been buried under a mountain of self-contradiction and counter-facts. The only remaining question of world interest is “Who orchestrated it, and to what end?”
Or, misquoting Woodrow Wilson, who is that “power” that is “…so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive,…” that they could pull something like 9/11 off, and remain invisible, their purpose(s) unknown?
My gut feel remains that striking the two greatest symbols of Western Imperial Power with such spectacular, in-your-face theatricality was not about traumatizing citizens into accepting the GWoT or gutting their Constitution. That could be done much more cheaply and easily. The jaw-dropping audacity was all about sending an unmistakeable shock ‘n awe message to the world’s centers of political and military power.
Committing mass murder & destruction in downtown Manhattan in broad daylight on live TV, and killing 100+ more inside the Pentagon for good measure, requires a staggeringly supreme confidence that their identity, means and motives would never come to light whether it succeeded or failed. That the world’s governments and its “free press” then scrambled to hide the facts from their publics is indicative of a power that I was reluctant to imagine existed.
What message was received in the halls of the world’s capitals (including Washington)? Was it as simple as: “We can unleash hell anywhere at will, with absolute impunity. You govern at our pleasure. Act accordingly.”? Or was a specific agenda implied?
Whether there were nukes in the basement (hmmm…), missiles at the Pentagon (yup) or whether a 737 crashed at Shanksville (nope) etc etc are questions that pale into near insignificance beside “Who?” and “Why?”.
Everything we’ve seen happen since would make more sense if that message could be deciphered. Have some leaders adopted a long term rope-a-dope strategy to resist? Dunno.
In any case, it may have worked for Ali but as Steinmeier said, the world is a complicated place.
Erebus
Erebus said: “Whether there were nukes in the basement (hmmm…), missiles at the Pentagon (yup) or whether a 737 crashed at Shanksville (nope) etc etc are questions that pale into near insignificance beside ‘Who?’ and ‘Why?’.”
I agree, but as to the ‘Who?’, who could it have been other than agents of the US or Israel governments?
For sure it wasn’t Arabs, Iranians, Russians, Chinese or Koreans. Where else is there to look? ETs? If one is not willing to consider ETs then it has to be Americans or Israelis or both, no?
Only question is which Americans or Israelis exactly? But for the average person in the street, compared to knowing that it was officials at high levels in those governments (most of whom probably continue to exercise their influence today), do their names really matter? Perhaps eventually they will be identified, arrested, put on trial, and executed, but in the meantime an informed citizen can choose to continue to support their treacherous government and the psychopathic system of domestic and global exploitation that it manages, or to (at the very least) withhold their support.
@Serendipity
“…who could it have been other than agents of the US or Israel governments?… do their names really matter?”
I think everyone agrees that govt agents had roles at a myriad of levels from cancelling investigations, to distributing the official narrative to the media, to organizing hi-jack drills, but I don’t think they were all in on it. All but a very few were just following orders. Perhaps they got perplexing orders, but after a career of following perplexing orders, what’s another one?
A few would look at their orders and realize “Something big is going down”.
A tinier few would realize an “Al Qaeda attack” is in play.
Maybe a handful would suspect “a false flag” is in play.
The probability is that no-one needed to know the plan for it to happen except those who created that plan and those who caused that plan to be created. After the event, no-one knows enough to overcome his cognitive dissonance and career self-interest to speak up. More to the point, it wouldn’t matter if they did. They’d be ignored, or silenced, or both.
There were also a lot of non-state actors, especially at critical nodes in the conspiracy’s structure (EG: security services) but they could be entirely ignorant.
If a real investigation ever got going, all of them, without exception, would be sacrificed to protect the real power that caused the plan to be created.
An investigation that got to the bottom of 9/11 would almost certainly require a Revolutionary Council to get it started. I’m not holding my breath.
Erebus