Moveable Feast Cafe 2020/02/03 … Open Thread

Much talk about the corona virus, but no one really going into how the story will end.

Here I will butt in and share what I read 2006 or so. Can’t remember the source nor do I recall the guy’s name – but both are unimporant.

In 1999 NATO bombed the Chinese embassy in Belgrade, Serbia. At that time, they used covert ops – spies on the ground – to mark the targets. Three Chinese diplomats died in the bombing. In 2003 in a US city a retired CIA operative was gunned down in a drive by shooting in front of his house. Interesting detail was that he was living in an affluent neighborhood where such shootings rarely happen. It was the spy that marked the Chinese embassy building. Retribution.

So I can confidently can assume, the lab technicians, the operatives that let the virus loose and other persons involved will face retribution.

Béchamp himself wrote: “I draw the conclusion that normal air never contains morbid microzymas, or what used to be called germs of diseases and are now called microbes; maintaining, in accord with the old medical aphorism (general truth) that diseases are born of us and in us, that no one has ever been able to communicate a characteristic disease of the nosological class [scientific classification of disease], such as anthrax, smallpox, typhoid fever, cholera, plague, tuberculosis, hydrophobia, syphilis, etc., by taking the germ in the air, but they are isolated from a patient, at some particular moment.”

https://www.healingnaturallybybee.com/you-cannot-catch-bugs-germs-bacteria-or-candidafungi/

See also … “Gaston Naessens and Somatid biology”
http://d.mp3vhs.de/Workshop/pdf/10.pdf

In closing arguments of the impeachment trial, Adam Shiffs feeble attempt to appeal to the emotions of the opposing side, as if there were any emotion left in the civil war of politics.

It will be a long time before these two party’s see eye to eye about anything besides convincing the citizens that there political views are the correct ones. Its a war of hatred that can only be seen in a democracy, and we are seeing it flourish right now. If the democrats lose the house, the party will crack under the stress of impotency.

Rush Limbaugh announces he has lung cancer: Iconic radio personality will miss shows due to treatment

https://www.rt.com/usa/479995-rush-limbaugh-lung-cancer/

“Veteran conservative talk-radio host Rush Limbaugh revealed to his listeners that he was recently diagnosed with advanced lung cancer, and will miss several upcoming shows due to treatment.

President Donald Trump’s campaign spokeswoman Kayleigh McEnany also sent a message of support. Trump praised Limbaugh at a Miami, Florida rally just last month – and let slip that he had just signed another four-year syndication contract.

Limbaugh has smoked cigars for decades, and is on the record calling them “just a tremendous addition to the enjoyment of life.” He has also struggled with addiction to prescription opioids over the years.”

This is horrible, terrible news…

I thought it might be interesting to see the type of things people in Russia talk about on social media when not posting the normal family posts.A Russian friend of mine posted this to her account:

Why Khrushchev pardoned Bandera and Vlasov (her English has problems.When she talks of “Bandera and Vlasov” she means their followers,not them personally.)
December 11, 2019
347
To begin with, it is worth recalling that the Soviet government was not as “bloodthirsty” as the “perestroika” and “democratizers” tried to inspire the people. Amnesties for Bandera and other “forest brothers” were regularly carried out under Stalin. The Soviet government skillfully combined the policy of “carrot and stick”, trying not only to suppress the Nazis by force, but also to return many ordinary bandits to civilian life. In Ukraine, Khrushchev personally initiated many amnesties. In addition, in May 1947, a Decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR “On the Abolition of the Death Penalty” was issued. As a result, since 1947, the “tower” has not threatened Bandera and other Nazis, even for the most terrible war crimes and acts of genocide during the Great Patriotic War and later. That is, the “bloody Stalinist regime” tried by all means to return even this, the most “frostbitten”,

In September 1955, the Decree “On the amnesty of Soviet citizens who collaborated with the occupiers during the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945.” Persons sentenced to up to 10 years in prison, accomplices of the Nazis were released from places of detention and from other punishment measures; convicted of service in the German army, police and special German forces. Convicts sentenced to over 10 years were reduced by half. Interestingly, such citizens were not simply amnestied, that is, pardoned, but also removed a criminal record and a loss of rights. As a result, many former Ukrainian Nazis, Bandera and members of their families were able to quickly “repaint”, and subsequently enter the Soviet and party bodies. By the 80s, “perestroika” they, according to various sources, amounted to from a third to half of the Ukrainian state, party and economic elite.

It should also be noted that, despite the overwhelming share of the RSFSR both in the population and in the economic contribution to the development of the Union, the Communists of the RSFSR did not have, in contrast to other republics, their own communist party. There was a party of the USSR, there were communist parties of the Union republics, including the Communist Party of Ukraine (KPU). Due to the absence of the Russian Communist Party-RSFSR, the Communist Party of the Communist Party of Ukraine possessed the largest weight in the CPSU (as the second most populous republic of the USSR). Most of the union leadership was represented by immigrants from the Ukrainian SSR.

As the old Bolsheviks and Stalinists were eliminated, which began with the coming of Khrushchev to power, the de-Stalinization, exposure of the “cult of personality” combined with the cleaning of the party, state and economic apparatus from the Stalinists, Khrushchev needed support in the Soviet elite. He relied on the Ukrainian wing of the Soviet elite. And Ukrainian society, in fact, rural, “kulak-petty-bourgeois” (industrialized cities, centers in the east of Lesser Russia). Here the effect of nepotism is very pronounced, similar to the tribal principle, only people are promoted not by the tribal, clan principle, but by kinship and comradely relations and relations. That is, Khrushchev relied on local nationalism, which is rapidly growing into Nazism. A similar situation was in other union republics and national republics and autonomies of the RSFSR.

Thus, the early release of Bandera, Vlasov, police and other war criminals fit into the policy of the Khrushchev “perestroika” ( “Khrushchev” as the first perestroika ; “Khrushchev” as the first perestroika. Part 2 ) and de-Stalinization. Khrushchev, and obviously the part of the Soviet elite behind him (the remnants of the “fifth column”, the Trotskyites), tried to “reform” the Soviet Union, “rebuild” it, find a common language with the West. To turn off Stalin’s policy of creating a fundamentally different civilization and society of the future, and to destroy an alternative to the Western world order. Bandera and Vlasov were to strengthen the “fifth column”. This was one of the preparatory measures for the collapse of Soviet civilization.

Therefore, many of Stalin’s undertakings and affairs were curtailed, or they tried to distort, “rebuild.” In particular, they did not begin to carry out the planned reform of the Communist Party in order to excommunicate the party from power and create the “Order of the Sword-Bearers” (an elite setting an example for the whole society). Since Khrushchev’s time, the elite nomenclature has gradually turned into a class of social parasites, which ultimately killed Soviet civilization. Stalinist (people’s) socialism is gradually being transferred to the rails of state capitalism, where party officials began to turn into a new class of exploiters. The basic principle of socialism – “to everyone according to his work” was violated, equalization in wages was introduced. The foundations of the normal functioning of industry and agriculture were violated, which, in contrast to the Stalinist decline in prices for essential goods, to a continuous increase in prices (distortion of socialism). Under the guise of military reform, Khrushchev organized a powerful attack on the Soviet armed forces: the ocean fleet was destroyed, the construction program of which was launched by Stalin; big problems arose in military aircraft construction and other areas of military construction; a huge amount of new military equipment, weapons disposed of; threw into the street a large number of personnel, military officers, foremen, the backbone of the victorious army.

The Russian ruble was deprived of gold security. They dealt a terrible blow to the Russian village, which only recovered after collectivization. Thousands of small towns and villages have been declared “unpromising” (in fact, the current “optimization” of rural Russia is a continuation of the same terrible thing). They sent Russian youth to raise the national suburbs. This was a powerful blow to the state-forming Russian ethnic group, the demographic potential of Russians (whose origins are in the villages of Russian provinces) suffered great damage. They destroyed the rational foundations of Soviet foreign and global politics, quarreled with the “second humanity” – China, which under Stalin respected and appreciated the “older Russian brother”, began to help various regimes in Asia and Africa to the detriment of the interests of the Russian state and the Russian people. In general, it was Perestroika-1,

The first attempt to bring down Soviet civilization was able to neutralize. Khrushchev was sent to retire. However, the deed was done. The USSR, by inertia, was making victories, moving forward, but its foundation was undermined. The disaster of 1985-1993. became inevitable.There is a myth that Khrushchev freed millions of innocently convicted, rehabilitated victims of political repression under Stalin. In fact, this myth has nothing to do with reality. Beria conducted a large-scale amnesty, and Khrushchev freed mainly Bandera.General situation
The victims of political repression are considered to be people convicted under article 58 (paragraphs 2-14) of the Criminal Code of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (CC RSFSR). The Criminal Code of other republics of the Soviet Union had a similar article. In reality, most of the points in this article were not related to politics. These included: the organization of uprisings, espionage, sabotage (for example, printing counterfeit money), terrorism, sabotage (criminal negligence). Similar articles were and are available in the Criminal Code of any state, including the modern Russian Federation. Only article 58-10 was purely political: propaganda or agitation, containing a call for the overthrow, undermining or weakening of Soviet power or for the commission of certain counter-revolutionary crimes, as well as the distribution or production or storage of literature of the same content. Which entailed imprisonment for a term of at least 6 months. Usually, in peacetime, the term under this article did not exceed 3 years. A distinctive feature of article 58 was that after serving the sentence under this article, citizens were sent into exile and had no right to return to their small homeland.In 1953, there were 467.9 thousand prisoners convicted under article 58 in the Gulag camps. Of these, 221.4 thousand were especially dangerous state criminals (spies, saboteurs, terrorists, Trotskyists, Socialist Revolutionaries, nationalists, etc.). They were in special camps of the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs. There were also another 62.4 thousand exiles. As a result, the total number of “political” was 530.4 thousand people. In total, in 1953 the camps and prisons of the USSR contained 2 million 526 thousand people.Amnesty of Beria
On March 26, 1953, the head of the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs, Lavrenty Beria, submitted a memorandum with a draft decree on amnesty to the Presidium of the CPSU Central Committee. The project provided for the release of all prisoners who were sentenced to up to 5 years. It was also supposed to release women with children under 10 years old, pregnant women, minors under the age of 18 years, elderly and seriously ill people. Beria noted that out of 2.5 million prisoners, only 220 thousand people are especially dangerous state criminals. The amnesty did not extend to dangerous criminals (bandits, murderers), counterrevolutionaries, and convicts for embezzlement of socialist property on an especially large scale. Also, the Minister of Internal Affairs proposed halving the sentence of convicts for more than 5 years and canceling the link for people who were serving sentences for article 58. Beria noted that more than 1.5 million people are convicted annually, with the majority for crimes that do not pose a particular danger to Soviet statehood. If the laws are not improved, then after the amnesty, in 1-2 years the total number of prisoners will again reach the previous figure.

Therefore, the minister suggested immediately amending the Criminal Code, mitigating criminal liability for minor crimes, and punishing administrative, domestic, and official crimes. Also, addressed to the Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the USSR, Malenkov Beria sent a separate presentation on the amnesty for all convicted extra-judicial bodies (including the NKVD Troika and the Special Conference of the OGPU-NKVD-MGB-MIA) with a complete removal of the criminal record. Basically, it was about those who were convicted during the repressions of 1937-1938.

The day after receiving the note by Beria, on March 27, 1953, the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR adopted the Decree “On Amnesty” for all prisoners whose term did not exceed 5 years, as well as halving the sentences of other prisoners, except for convicts of 10-25 years for banditry, premeditated murder, for counter-revolutionary crimes and for the theft of socialist property on an especially large scale. First of all, pregnant women and those with young children, minors, the elderly and the disabled were released from places of detention. Amnesty was applied to foreigners on a common basis.

As a result, under an amnesty, 1 million 200 thousand people were released, investigations on 400 thousand people were terminated. Among the released there were almost 100 thousand people who were convicted under article 58 (“political”), but not included in the category of especially dangerous criminals. Also, according to the decree on amnesty, all those deported were released ahead of schedule, that is, those who were forbidden to reside in certain places and cities. The category of deportees itself was eliminated. Part of the exiles, those who were supposed to live in a particular settlement, were also freed. Beria’s proposals for an amnesty for persons convicted by extra-judicial authorities under Article 58 were not reflected in this decree. Thus, the first large-scale liberation of the “political”, almost a third of the total, was carried out by the “bloody ghoul” Beria (The black myth of the “bloody executioner”; The black myth of the “bloody executioner” Beria. Part 2 ; Why they hate Beria ), not Khrushchev.

It is also worth remembering that Beria began his activities as People’s Commissar of the NKVD in the fall of 1938 with a review of all cases against people convicted in 1937-1938. During only 1939, he released from prison more than 200 thousand people, including those who did not have time to carry out the execution sentence. Note that in the same 1939, 63.8 thousand people were convicted under Article 58 of the Criminal Code, that is, Beria was released 3 times more than she was convicted.

In late summer and autumn 1953, Beria planned to make a large-scale return to the homeland of peoples deported during the war. In the spring of 1953, draft Soviet decrees were developed at the Soviet Ministry of Internal Affairs, which in August they planned to submit for approval to the Supreme Council and the Council of Ministers of the USSR. It was planned by the end of 1953 to return to their former places of residence about 1.7 million people. But in connection with the arrest (or murder) of L.P. Beria on June 26, 1953, these decrees did not take place. They returned to these plans only in 1957. In 1957-1957 the national autonomies of the Kalmyks, Chechens, Ingush, Karachays and Balkars were restored. These peoples returned to their small homelands. In 1964, restrictions on deported Germans were lifted. But the decree completely removing restrictions on freedom of movement and confirming the Germans’ right to return to the places from which they were deported, was adopted only in 1972 (that is, after Khrushchev). The line of Crimean Tatars, Meskhetian Turks, Greeks, Koreans and some others came only during the Gorbachev “perestroika” period. That is, the role of Khrushchev in the liberation of deported peoples is exaggerated. This was the plan of Beria, which was implemented in a truncated form.Amnesty Khrushchev
On May 4, 1954, the Presidium of the CPSU Central Committee decided to review all cases against people convicted of “counter-revolutionary crimes.” For this, special commissions were formed, which included senior officials of the Prosecutor’s Office, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the KGB and the USSR Ministry of Justice. The Central Commission was headed by the Prosecutor General of the USSR R. A. Rudenko, and the local ones were by the prosecutors of the republics, territories and regions. By the beginning of 1956, the commissions considered cases against 337.1 thousand people. As a result, 153.5 thousand people were freed, but only 14.3 thousand of them were officially rehabilitated. The decree “On Amnesty” was applied to the rest.

In addition, in September 1955, the Decree “On the amnesty of Soviet citizens who collaborated with the invaders during the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945.” A significant part of political prisoners fell under this amnesty. By the beginning of January 1956, the number of persons convicted under Article 58 of the Criminal Code was 113.7 thousand. They were mostly people who have a weapon in their hands fought against the Soviet regime, or on the side of the Germans during the Second World War, or in the ranks of the nationalists in Ukraine, the Baltic States and other republics of the USSR.

In addition, after Khrushchev’s report at the Twentieth Congress (February 1956), it was decided to hold a demonstration release and rehabilitation of political prisoners. Immediately after the congress, special visiting commissions of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR were created. They worked directly in places of detention and received the right to make decisions on the release or reduction of the sentence. A total of 97 such commissions were formed. By July 1, 1956, the commissions had considered over 97 thousand cases. Over 46 thousand people were released with a criminal record. But only 1,487 people were rehabilitated as convicted on falsified materials. Thus, 90% of political prisoners were released before the famous XX Congress. That is, the role of Khrushchev in the release from the camps and exile of political prisoners is greatly exaggerated

What Day Is Today???

The Extremely Intriguing/Disturbing Clues From London may just push those with somewhat mild cases of Trump Derangement Syndrome…………into full blown panic.

But when it comes to solutions to complex and ultra esoteric puzzle solving, cooler heads must prevail and calmly assemble the evidence……the knowns

Yes, Today IS the State of the Union Speech.

But it is also GENESIS: The Restoration Day For the fully functioning ORIGINAL “code” of The Real Bitcoin, BSV…………or Bitcoin Satoshi Vision.

And guess what, guys???

The two ARE intimately related.

So keep your guard up, by all means, as I myself am doing,as I go deeper…and deeper…into this but at least take a look………….at the Decade Opening Cover……………..of the London Economist:

And this is Political Intelligence Advice, NOT Financial Advice….either from me, or from the other presenters of these…..quite frankly MASSIVE….In Plain Sight Clues.

Appreciate the Irony!

I sent a longer exposition titled The Trump Connection to the Real Bitcoin, that ends thusly:

The presenter, the Gitmo Truth 17 Channel says:

“You probably don’t want to listen to me for crypto advice……I had thousands of Bitcoin in 2011 -2012….. I sold them for a small, small profit.” LOL Even in the Cabal Co-opted BTC or Fake Bitcoin that’s $20 million bucks December 2017 guys…and even $9 million today…for Just One…..”Thousand “Bitcoin”

But In Terms of Political Intelligence “Gold”..it just might be that Gitmo Truth….. has struck the Mother Lode:

https://youtu.be/hAbyp1IXwy4?t=265

And stop it there and study it.

THE WORLD IN 2020 Cover of the London Economist contains TRUMP BREXIT in very large letters…then CLIMATE (Which gitmo doesn’t mention) ……….however among the much smaller letters seemingly randomly filling the middle to bottom of the cover, the letters spelling “SATOSHI” are continuous but your boundary has to curve to the right and down (if you have the magazine…and a pen…………LOL)………………THEN….BSV is in there backwards…..(Hey, ya gotta work a little bit on any decent puzzle!) but the v continues on with i-s-i-o-n.

The Cover is an OPTOMETRY CHART….above link

Is YOUR vision 2020???

Happy 0204……………..2020!!

Git Mo’ Truth remains hopeful …but admittedly (Polly) remains …a little creeped out. LOL.

I sent her and Quite Frankly a much longer exposition of all these clues, and from experience, will not be terribly surprised if either answers………… or never does.

Everything, ALL the clues they were provided ….and MORE…provided in due time…if just one person requests it….and wants to Git Mo’ into this no doubt critically meaningful “corner” or perhaps CENTER of the Current Complex World Strategic Puzzle..

BTW: For Good OR for Evil (or both!!) The London Economist is NO JOKE…..IMHO, that is.

It is time for a Palestinian spring

How Netanyahu and Kushner undermined diplomacy and changed the Palestinian calculus.

https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/time-palestinian-spring-200203115358215.html

“It is embarrassingly clear that the plan is based on Netanyahu’s extremist ideas. Indeed, when Trump and Netanyahu stood side-by-side at the White House ceremony to announce it, there could be little doubt whose vision it was. Trump seemed like he was reading it for the first time.

And from there on, it was downhill for the plan as the president’s son-in-law parroted Netanyahu’s propaganda pointers and debunked cliches.

Indeed there is an eerie resemblance between Kushner and Netanyahu’s former spokesman, Mark Regev, in style and spin, both taking their cue from Frank Luntz’s Global Language Dictionary, which became Israel’s propaganda playbook after its release a decade ago.”

Trump and Balfour Compared

https://www.globalresearch.ca/trump-balfour-compared/5702877

“Imperial arrogance, racism and disregard for the rights of the Palestinians, and callous domestic politics, these were the elements that motivated Balfour. They are the same elements that can be seen to be behind Trump’s “Deal of the Century”. There is, however, in the Trump “Deal” an additional element that makes it even more disturbing than its predecessor — and that is its blatant disingenuousness.

What makes this “Deal” more disturbing than the “Declaration” is that it ignores the history and consequential developments of the last century, two devastating world wars, the emergence of a body of international law and conventions that sought to learn the lessons of those wars and regulate the behavior of nations in times of war, and multiple Arab-Israeli wars that have taken the lives of tens of thousands, left millions as refugees, and created a deep well of bitterness among those who were expelled and those denied their legitimate rights under a cruel occupation.The Trump “Deal” pretends that it can brush all of this history aside, tear up this body of laws and conventions, and disregard the humanity of the victims of dispossession and loss of rights.

Most disturbing is that, like a real estate huckster, the “Deal” attempts to do all this with a trickster’s “sleight of hand”, saying “it’s a great deal for the Palestinians”, “theirs for the taking”, “a win-win”, “it’s their last chance”, and then cynically adding “if they don’t screw it up”. In this regard, the Trump “Deal” makes clear where it is ultimately different than Balfour’s Declaration. At least Balfour was honest about his disregard for the rights of the Palestinians.”

The Syrian Arab Army SAA has entered Sareqib and push towards Taftanaz airbase.
https://sana.sy/en/?p=184589
See map :
https://www.almasdarnews.com/article/new-map-of-idlib-battle-after-syrian-army-reaches-strategic-highway/
Turkey has positioned themselves and control an area northeeast of the strategic highways at Sarakeb to actively support HTS jihadi forces. HTS hold the areas to the north and east. Turkish and HTS form a strategic aliance as Turkey has demanded that the Syrian Arab Army leave their country, a demand that is wrong on all laspects of legality and international law. Turkey has been called by Russia for violating the Astana agreement. As Turkey operates as a active military for HTS they are illegally in Syria and must not take part in any military operation or demands. Actually they entered Syria illegally and must leave since they created an agreement with Russia based on false pretention, no doubt Turkey is representing the main enemy in Syria.