by Pepe Escobar : crossposted with Strategic Culture Foundation
Nixon 68 is back with a vengeance, with President Trump placing himself as the guarantor/enforcer of Law & Order.
That slogan guaranteed Nixon’s election, and was coined by Kevin Phillips, then an expert in “ethnic voting patterns”.
Philips makes for a very interesting case. In 1999, he became the author of a seminal book: The Cousins’ Wars: Religion, Politics, and the Triumph of Anglo-America, where he tracks how a “small Tudor kingdom” ended up establishing global hegemony.
The division of the English-speaking community into two great powers – “one aristocratic, ‘chosen’ and imperial; and one democratic, ‘chosen’ and manifest destiny-driven”, as Philips correctly establishes – was accomplished by, what else, a war triptych: the English Civil War, the American revolution and the U.S. Civil War.
Now, we may be at the threshold of a fourth war – with unpredictable and unforeseen consequences.
As it stands, what we have is a do-or-die clash of models: MAGA against an exclusivist Fed/Wall Street/Silicon Valley-controlled system.
MAGA – which is a rehash of the American dream – simply cannot happen when society is viciously polarized; vast sectors of the middle class are being completely erased; and mass immigration is coming from the Global South.
In contrast, the Fed as a Wall Street hedge fund meets Silicon Valley model, a supremely elitist 0.001% concoction, has ample margins to thrive.
The model is based on even more rigid corporate monopoly; the preeminence of capital markets, where a Wall Street boom is guaranteed by government debt-buybacks of its own debt; and life itself regulated by algorithms and Big Data.
This is the Brave New World dreamed by the techno-financial Masters of the Universe.
Trump’s MAGA woes have been compounded by a shoddy geopolitical move in tandem with Law and Order: his re-election campaign will be under the sign of “China, China, China.” When in trouble, blame a foreign enemy.
That comes from serially failed opportunist Steve Bannon and his Chinese billionaire sidekick Guo Wengui, or Miles Guo. Here they are in Statue of Liberty mode announcing their no holds barred infowar campaign to demonize the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to Kingdom Come and “free the Chinese people”.
Bannon’s preferred talking point is that if his infowar fails, there will be “kinetic war”. That is nonsense. Beijing’s priorities are elsewhere. Only a few neo-conned Dr. Strangeloves would envisage “kinetic war”- as in a pre-emptive nuclear strike against Chinese territory.
Alastair Crooke has masterfully shown how the geoeconomic game, as Trump sees it, is above all to preserve the power of the U.S. dollar: “His particular concern would be to see a Europe that was umbilically linked to the financial and technological heavyweight that is China. This, in itself, effectively would presage a different world financial governance.”
But then there’s The Leopard syndrome: “If we want things to stay as they are, things will have to change”. Enter Covid-19 as a particle accelerator, used by the Masters of the Universe to tweak “things” a bit so they not only stay as they are but the Master grip on the world tightens.
The problem is Covid-19 behaves as a set of – uncontrollable – free electrons. That means nobody, even the Masters of the Universe, is able to really weigh the full consequences of a runaway, compounded financial/social crisis.
Deconstructing Nixon-Trump
Russiagate, now totally debunked, has unfolded in effect as a running coup: a color non-revolution metastasizing into Ukrainegate and the impeachment fiasco. In this poorly scripted and evidence-free morality play with shades of Watergate, Trump was cast by the Democrats as Nixon.
Big mistake. Watergate had nothing to do with a Hollywood-celebrated couple of daring reporters. Watergate represented the industrial-military-security-media complex going after Nixon. Deep Throat and other sources came from inside the Deep State. And it was not by accident that they were steering the Washington Post – which, among other roles, plays the part of CIA mouthpiece to perfection.
Trump is a completely different matter. The Deep State keeps him under control. One just needs to look at the record: more funds for the Pentagon, $1 trillion in brand new nuclear weapons, perennial sanctions on Russia, non-stop threats to Russia’s western borders, (failed) efforts to derail Nord Stream 2. And this is only a partial list.
So, from a Deep State point of view, the geopolitical front – containment of Russia-China – is assured. Domestically, it’s much more complicated.
As much as Black Lives Matter does not threaten the system even remotely like the Black Panthers in the 60s, Trump believes his own Law & Order, like Nixon, will once again prevail. The key will be to attract the white women suburban vote. Republican pollsters are extremely optimistic and even talking about a “landslide”.
Yet the behavior of an extra crucial vector must be understood: what corporate America wants.
When we look at who’s supporting Black Lives Matter – and Antifa – we find, among others, Adidas, Amazon, Airbnb, American Express, Bank of America, BMW, Burger King, Citigroup, Coca Cola, DHL, Disney, eBay, General Motors, Goldman Sachs, Google, IBM, Mastercard, McDonald’s, Microsoft, Netflix, Nike, Pfizer, Procter & Gamble, Sony, Starbucks, Twitter, Verizon, WalMart, Warner Brothers and YouTube.
This who’s who would suggest a completely isolated Trump. But then we have to look at what really matters; the class war dynamics in what is in fact a caste system, as Laurence Brahm argues.
Black Lives Matter, the organization and its ramifications, is essentially being instrumentalized by selected corporate interests to accelerate their own priority: to crush the U.S. working classes into a state of perpetual anomie, as a new automated economy rises.
That may always happen under Trump. But it will be faster without Trump.
What’s fascinating is how this current strategy of tension scenario is being developed as a classic CIA/NED playbook color revolution.
An undisputed, genuine grievance – over police brutality and systemic racism – has been completely manipulated, showered with lavish funds, infiltrated, and even weaponized against “the regime”.
Just to control Trump is not enough for the Deep State – due to the maximum instability and unreliability of his Demented Narcissus persona. Thus, in yet another priceless historical irony, “Assad must go” metastasized into “Trump must go”.
The cadaver in the basement
One must never lose track of the fundamental objectives of those who firmly control that assembly of bought and paid for patsies in Capitol Hill: to always privilege Divide and Rule – on class, race, identity politics.
After all, the majority of the population is considered expendable. It helps that the instrumentalized are playing their part to perfection, totally legitimized by mainstream media. No one will hear lavishly funded Black Lives Matter addressing the real heart of the matter: the reset of the predatory Restored Neoliberalism project, barely purged of its veneer of Hybrid Neofascism. The blueprint is the Great Reset to be launched by the World Economic Forum in January 2021.
It will be fascinating to watch how Trump deals with this “Summer of Love” remake of Maidan transposed to the Seattle commune. The hint from Team Trump circles is that he will do nothing: a coalition of white supremacists and motorcycle gangs might take care of the “problem” on the Fourth of July.
None of this sweetens the fact that Trump is at the heart of a crossfire hurricane: his disastrous response to Covid-19; the upcoming, devastating effects of the New Great Depression; and his intimations pointing to what could turn into martial law.
Still, the legendary Hollywood maxim – “no one knows anything” – rules. Even running with a semi-cadaver in a basement, the Democrats may win in November just by doing nothing. Yet Teflon Trump should never be underestimated. The Deep State may even realize he’s more useful than they think.
Best summation of the current OS political state of affairs I’ve read yet. I was ready to pounce on this as a simplistic reading of history after just reading the title, but Pepe quickly brought me around to his way of thinking, especially after the paragraph on that masterful psyop that sill continues to befuddle, Watergate. Poor old Nixon had it pretty good back then comparatively speaking, even with the entire MIC and both political parties after blood for his giving up on the Vietnam adventure and his lack of support for the oil depletion allowance (a very big deal back then!), while Trump remains an enigma that apparently even his own staffers can’t figure out. Political gravitas speaking, there’s simply no comparison between the two whatsoever.
The only thing that still puzzles me is the question of why the DC old guard hasn’t simply dispatched Trump yet by any of their number of “old school” methods: bribery, personal and/or family threats, or that old standby assassination, which in this day and age could be carried out so discreetly that it would never ruffle a feather, especially with someone with so many obvious health concerns as Trump. That tells me there’s something bigger going on here than just discrediting a laughably discreditable president. I won’t go into all of that here (most of which is patently obvious anyway), other than to say that if the project is to get rid of Trump in November and install the next Zionist stooge(s), then that should be a slam dunk to do, whether by using all means legal or extralegal at their disposal. Should Trump manage to maintain support and win another term, I’d consider that less a product of his supporters turning out in droves to reelect him and more a product of that being deemed the better option for whatever it is the Zionists plan to roll out next. Voting will likely have very little to do with any of it, other than as a momentary pre-holiday distraction for the very likely still locked down, beleaguered, and impoverished plebes.
No disrespect naturally, but when missing large portions of the puzzle, do not try to guess the big picture.
None taken. Trouble is that we’ll never have all of the pieces (by design), therefore speculation is what we’re necessarily left with. It’s not like the mainstream media is reliably filling in the picture for us at all. Regardless, I think the big picture is coming into tighter focus with every passing day.
Agreed, the death of a nation is done by a thousand cuts, and we are a tad over 1/2 way thru that process.
Re: Death of a nation – I suppose it would be a bit hard in some southern States now to revive the Confederate Flag (aka NC SC) given militant blacks and DEMS running things there ?
I think someone ought to think about getting it out of mothballs given way things are headed.
I suppose its also ironic that Obama’s policies have caused US division – when he tried to make out he was another Abe Lincoln reborn again (both being from Illinois). But this time he’s behind it, whereas Abe had to respond to it.
“other than to say that if the project is to get rid of Trump in November and install the next Zionist stooge(s),”
Perhaps it would aid understanding to refer to a wished project given previous moves rather than the project in respect of the dance of changing partners, from the actor who didn’t like air traffic controllers whilst maintaining his portrayal of concern/sincerity, by way of a “safe pair of hands”, to the would like to be spinner of his partners, through the guy would didn’t inherit his father’s hands but many of his father’s former minders, through the sun tanned smart guy with well-fitted suit, nice teeth, polished shoes, and sometime cute moves, to the Benito Mussolini tribute act.
Given that dancing in revolutions can lead to dizzyness perhaps your rendition is more representative?
To Disaffected
Trump is doing half what they want and better than a DEM could.
To get rid of him the old way would be more dangerous and would cause lasting damage to the system and grass roots party support. Short term gain for long term problems.
Elections are wafer thin majorities now and the GOP cannot risk any more problems.
Not just POTUS but House & Senate.
Nixon was under the control of those who wanted VietNam wound down because of monetary damage it was doing. They also wanted the oil price up so it could replace gold as backing for the US$.
Trump is the peoples man like Reagan tried to be.
Like the rest of us, Pepe does not have a clue what will result from the royal mess the world is in. The future is even more unpredictable than it usually is — hence everyone is willing to take a wild shot at it!
“So, from a Deep State point of view, the geopolitical front – containment of Russia-China – is assured.”
Judging how the pressure and the sanctions have made russia and china work together I don t see how the containment of russia and china is assured. Actually I think it s the other way around. China and russia have some how managed to contain the madness from the deep state. The policy of the deep state is not working (they didn t make russia or china weaker at all) and the only thing people of the deep state will do is increasing the pressure because doubling down on stupid idea is what they do best.
The real question is not trump or biden (we know that the deep state will be in charge anyway). It s how long russia and china will be able to prevent the us from going too far?
Keep in mind that we almost went too far when the us decided to kill Soleimani.
Laurent: I think Pepe means the “policy” of containment of Russia and China is assured. As you well point out the larger reality is another matter altogether.
“It s how long russia and china will be able to prevent the us from going too far?”
Your sentence is a function of at least two assumptions in respect of the purposes of the PRC and the Russia Federation and their facilitation, and the facility of “The United States of America”.
This is in part facilitated by your immersion in, and usage of, the/ “us”.
Although popular, the projection of holograms of expectations are often prejudicial to continued well-being.
I suggest you to read this:
/75th-anniversary-of-the-great-victory-shared-responsibility-to-history-and-our-future/
It is Putin s statement about WW2 and our collective future.
Do you think Putin is calling for talks and diplomacy for fun? Do you think Putin is talking about the fact that world peace is being geopardized because he is “projecting holograms of expectations”?
“I suggest you to read this..” which is predicated on an assumption that “this” has not been read by “you” and consequently has not yet been interpreted by “you”.
Some depend on the interpretations of others through various limitations of facilities.
Given omniscience does not exist, in some assay all have various limitations of facilities, but not necessarily the same assay of limitations and/or the same limitations in all component parts of facilities.
This is understood and reflected in varying assays by those making speeches; such activity generally being engaged in in furtherance of some purpose to/with various audiences which may not share similar facility in the language of broadcast.
Partly as a consequence of the above some have different purposes in engaging in interpretations which are not necessarily served by widely broadcasting through/in some portals and fora any interpretation, including an interpretation of a speech by Mr. Putin in Russian within which like all languages words are catalysts of connotations, or in any other language or to/with anyone else.
Silence very often has greater utility to facilitate purpose given the propensity of some opponents to attempt to bridge doubt by belief/interpretation to attain comfort/confirmation bias, including interpretation of our/we as in “We the people….”
An example of others resorting to related techniques in broadcasting speeches was illustrated in the first public meeting held in Moscow in respect of the Malaysian aircraft shot down over Ukraine.
The simultaneous translation in Dutch, Indonesian, and Malay were assessed by native speakers as being excellent.
The simultaneous translation in English was assessed by native speakers as bordering on the amateur, and the performance of the woman making the simultaneous translation was assessed as being hesitant.
At the end of the meeting all participants were asked for their assessment/interpretation of the interpretation but not all gave their assessment but chose to remain silent.
Putin s statement has been translated. We can read it. People who have translated it had all the time they needed to make the best translation possible. We are not talking about live translations which could contain mistakes. So your example regarding the malaysian aircraft is irrelevent.
Moreover, if we look at what happened during the recent years we don t need to listen to what policians are saying to make assessments of the current situation. We can just look at what they have been doing. We don t need interpretations to do that.
When the people in charge of the usa destroy very important treaties regarding strategic weapons limitations, put unilateral sanctions on several countries, bomb countries, kill officials of a country etc we know that the situation is bad. Especially when the actions of those people in charge of the usa are more and more aggressive year after year.
These are not interpretations of statements, these are facts.
Last thing I want to point out: putin, russian diplomats in general do not talk to say nothing. When they talk they choose their words very carefully. When russian president or russian diplomats talk about their fear that the current path is very dangerous I think we should pay great attention. These are warnings. Military analysts like the Saker are listening to them and explaining what could happen. I think we should pay attention to them too.
” I think”
Given the data-streams broadcast, perhaps a more precise intepretation would read I believe, including but not restricted to, in the conflation of believe/think.
Thank you for your co-operation in illustrating some of the contents of the petri dish of the opponents’ culture, including but not restricted to, “Some depend on the interpretations of others through various limitations of facilities” and propensity to attempt to bridge doubt by belief to attain confirmation bias, including of “facts”.
One of the significances of the MH17 translation is a function of the “audience” being asked to evaluate the interpretations/translations.
However the requirement of most of the audience to rely on the interpretations/translations of others
was a function of their lack of facilities to undertake the task themselves.
In science and other areas there is a requirement for “peer review” which is not wholly possible given the assays of facilities of “peers” required to do so, including the “peer’s”assays of pre-judgement as a recent book by Dr. Judy Mikovits entitled Plague of Corruption makes reference.
Consequently even although some in the MH17 meeting audience had a good facility in the Russian language, although not all to a standard to be evaluated as “peers” of the professional simultaneous translators, and the professional simultaneous translators did not have a level of facility in matters such as avionics to be deemed “peers” of some in the audience, some in the audience recognised the limitation of their functionality and did not pass an opinion/interpretation/evaluation/belief – they remained silent.
The others chose in significant assay to bridge doubt by belief to attain comfort/confirmation bias.
The organisers designed the meeting partly to enable assessment of the audience’s initial perceptions and practices – although some, including some in the audience, may interpret this as an attempt at “perception management” given their experience in different contexts.
“Representative democracy” is also facilitated through these examples, except in the case of “representative democracy” the purpose/strategy is to limit challenge to prevailing social relations within linear paradigm through various techniques of perception management, including encouraging the complicity/participation of as many as possible of the audience in an assay of self-management of the management of their own perceptions, including but not limited to “voting”.
Mr. Rove alluded to this in his observation that “You can fool some of the people all of the time and those are the ones you should concentrate on”.
In thumbnail, prevailing social relations are relations based on equal but different where-in some differences facilitate difference in “reward” thereby precluding equality, whilst facilitating competition and habitat/social destruction.
The purpose of some is to facilitate relations based on equal and different which facilitates co-operation, difference, equality, and social construction to transcend present social relations based on equal and different, since such relations based on equal but different are existential threats to continued/enhanced well-being of the planet including life-forms there-in/there-upon, whilst recognising the impossibility of achieving omniscience or perfection in any lateral process of transcendence
Part of the purpose of evaluating audience perception in the MH17 meeting and subsequent was/is to facilitate and create strategies to facilitate relations based on equal and different, a practice which is part of the reason that those doing so are perceived as existential threats to social relations based on equal but different, and formed part of the reason that some in the audience chose silence.
As Mr. Schroedinger and his cat illustrates the existence of phenomena are not wholly dependent on other’s perception of their existence.
When Soleimani has been killed Iran didn t need interpretations or to believe anything to understand that the us government is attacking them and is an hostile country. Same applies to russia with nato expansion in europe and to china with us warships sailing close to chinese waters and us attacks on huawei.
We can also had the atrocious anti iran anti russia anti china western propaganda.
When someone get hit in the face he doesn t need to project holograms of expectations to understand that he is being hit and he needs to react to protect himself.
You keep talking about holograms and interpretations or expectations.
My question about preventing the us government from going too far is based of facts and on what the us government has done. It s not a question of holograms or interpretations or assumptions.
You can keep talking about abstract concepts for ever. It s empty you prove nothing.
” It s empty you prove nothing.”
Not all are members of the rubbing sticks school of thermo-dynamics and hence do not seek to prove anything since such practice would emulate and re-enforce reliance of others on interpretations of others.
Some afford others opportunities to others to test hypotheses if they so desire, subject to their facilities as was achieved in the MH17 meeting : the assays and extent of the facilities and purposes of those offered such opportunities condition their needs and perceptions of such, and the liklihood of whether they would receive and/or self-create, and in what register they may receive, an “answer.”
In a different thread you may find an illustration of this using the metaphor of stones in the road and options afforded by falling over the stone.
These conditions have been met, and hence silence will become the most productive response (an apparent paradox to some), but as some recognise not all share the same “culture”.
.
You never answer to any of my arguments. You just keep talking about empty concepts which lead to nowhere and picking some of my sentences and putting them out of their context.
This is not a conversation it s a monologue. I am not interested in monologues.
Besides your points have nothing to do with this tread. It s like some kind of sophisticated trolling.
You said that by asking how long russia and china can prevent the us from going to far I was making assumptions and projections of holograms.
I wasn t. My question is based on analysis based on real facts. The danger is very real. Putin sees the danger. Russian diplomats chinese diplomats military analysts like the Saker see that danger too.
You may like using your own conclusions and choose to remain silent. I agree with you. By judging this weird monologue you have been doing, silence is the most appropriate response.
Wow … what a depressing read. That is not a condemnation of the esteemed Mr. Escobar, simply that the facts he points out, and the place where he intimates this all leads to, is nothing but what I said. Depressing.
I truly wonder if there is any hope for the human experience.
As Pepe said: ‘Just to control Trump is not enough for the Deep State – due to the maximum instability and unreliability of his Demented Narcissus persona. Even running with a semi-cadaver in a basement, the Democrats may win in November just by doing nothing.’
Yippee, good times ahead!’
Another element may arise and that is science. Russia, China and the socialist block countries of Asia and Europe’ is where STEM education is becoming the envy of the world and beyond anything the US can match. What use ‘political studies’ then?
Strange that police forces in the dis United States of America are run by/accountable to their state and not controlled by the Federal Govt. One would think that any blame for black, or the majority other killings by police, should be the responsibility of the state within which they reside. Why is Trump being blamed for the policy of state governors, both Democrat & Republican, shortfalls in policing standards?
Because this is an attempt (possibly successful?) to make sure Trump is thrown out of power.When riots happened under Obama no one blamed him.And since those those today in politics attacking Trump were in those days Obama minions.No political forces tried to use the riots against him.
Another thought regarding the Seattle farce. Why can’t Trump do what the Spanish govt did regarding the attempted cessation of Catalonia? After all, haven’t the Mayor of Seattle and the Governor of Washingtion state both been seen to be in agreement of the so called CHAZ? All he needs to do is to lock up the politicians within that state as cessationists and replace them with his agents.
Why not cut off power and water to CHAZ? All this talk of the “Bikers for Trump” going in to sort this out is nonsense. If that happens Trump really is dead in the water.
From an outsiders point of view, if dis USA actually disintigrates, this is probably better news for world peace as the zio’s elsewhere would surely lose impetus. I only see a lose/lose situation for the MIC and elites at this time and hope that’s not peak optimism…
European states are much more centralized than the US is. When the elites don’t agree on something there are plenty of “checks and balances” that one side or the other can use to prevent strong and timely action being taken to solve a problem.Which is why nothing is ever done,or at least done quickly to solve problems in the US.Its only actions outside the US that can be taken quickly.
The US has without a doubt the largest military, but is it capable of fighting a kinetic war against a major power for a prolonged period? This would require a secure domestic industrial production capacity. US military production, for the most part, is from purely domestic corporations, but the chain of supply to these corporations include many overseas suppliers including within China. Both China and Russia have a distinct advantage in this regard. The shift of US industrial capacity to nations with cheap labor for higher profits has denuded the industrial production of the US. It is possible for the US to ramp up its domestic production as it did in WW2, but this takes time. In the current kinetic environment it is questionable if the US would have the time. I cannot see the US in a major war until corporations return industrial production to the US.
Dick, another important element to add to your reference about US domestic Industrial capacity, is the deficiencies of the necessary natural resources, compared to Asia, and also Africa, many of which have been secured by China.
The problem is that if the us would start a war with what you call a major power, the war would be over in less than a few days because of nuclear weapons. The cold war remained cold for only one reason: nukes.
If at the end of a war, the only predictable result would be your own destruction, you avoid the war. It was called the MAD (mutual assured destruction). This was know by both the ussr and the us during the cold war. Unfortunatly, people changed in the us and right now many people in charge of the us strategy think they can win such a war. This shift clearly appeared for the first time in 2002, when the us decided to withdraw from the ABM treaty. This forced russia to develop weapons impossible to intercept to keep the MAD and peace alive. If putin judged necessary to present the new weapons developed by russia in 2018 it s because he knows very well that the us wants to become capable of winning a nuclear war by attacking first and intercepting the ennemy s counter strike (the reason why the us decided to withdraw from the ABM treaty back in 2002).
So I would say that industrial production in the us or not, the risk of war is very real.
In a previous comment I wrote that the us policy consisting of threats, sanctions and pressure against china and russia doesn t work so well. I also wrote that these people in charge of the deep state will just push harder because they cannot change their mindset.
It seems that I can perfectly predict their moves. Look at what we can learn from sputnik.
1) Russia:
-> The US State Department has authorized Kiev to procure a 16-vessel Mark VI Patrol Boat fleet and associated weapons for around $600 million. Washington claims Kiev’s current forces are inadequate to combat vessels from neighboring countries.
Selling more weapons to the ukraine to increase pressure on russia. It seems that the ukrainian government is using well the 5 billions $ loan it received from the IMF (sarcasm).
This is the link:
https://sputniknews.com/military/202006181079656183-us-state-department-oks-600-million-deal-giving-ukraine-gun-radar-defense-systems/
2) China:
A congressional advisory board has warned that Beijing has developed at least three weapons capable of attacking the US electrical grid and intends on using them in a first-strike scenario, calling China’s “No First Use” policy “a bodyguard of lies and disinformation.” He also said that “No First Use” policy “does not withstand the test of common sense”.
Of course according to him chinese hackers stole all these weapons from the us.
When you destroy the INF treaty and you want to put missiles with nukes around china (and russia) this is the propaganda you use to justify your policy.
This is the link:
https://sputniknews.com/military/202006181079656094-us-report-claims-china-intends-nuclear-first-strike-with-stolen-super-emp-weapons/
There is no clean, simple, just solution to the mess we are living through.
At the end of this “transformation” is dystopia, not a better world.
We have seen the Hegemon fail to make a just world. Instead it delivered war, death, destruction and chaos.
We have seen the US government fail to correct itself. Instead, we received a Deep State coup, an entrenched Shadow Government that went lawless, and a fourth estate that is a propaganda arm of the Liberal Cult.
We are witnessing a cultural revolution intent on destroying anything good that remains worthwhile.
First, understand Cults and Cult behavior. The top echelon leading the way manifests as a Liberal Cult of Elitists.
Next, understand Cultural Revolutions. Study the Chinese Cultural Revolution, the Red Guards, and study the Cambodian Khymer Rouge Cultural Revolution, genocidal destruction using children as executioners.
You will then understand clearly what is happening in the USA.
When the Great Fraud, Obama, promised that he was leading the “transformation” of America, this is what he meant. Tear down what exists and replace it with the Feudal Cult of Liberalism.
You are living through the early days of the American Cultural Revolution. You ain’t seen nothing yet.
You are right – I was telling my brother yesterday how what is happening reminds me of the Khymer Rouge and the children executioners I remember from a movie we saw when were children I think it was called The Killing Fields.
Only this time we may have trannies and zxy-sex freaks doing the killing as per new feudal master’s instructions
Red Guards: This was my immediate thought after watching videos in which Bill Clinton, Gavin Newsome (re Calif.) and Chelsea Clinton and some dame in Massachusetts discussed the creation of corps of “contact tracers” (I call them contact tracKers) to hunt down “infected” citizens and compel them to be placed in “dignified quarantine” and to execute other similar orders on their elders. Newsome proclaimed that we/Calfornia is not going back to “normal life.”
Bill Clinton thought it would be grand to use some of the bailout $$ supposedly to support American businesses (ha ha, only corporations and Wall Street, but giving that a pass here) to pay for training Americorps kids to be trackers, uh, tracers. *Not* to provide training for these young people in actual professions such as health care or teaching literacy or something useful to them, and to the country.
No.
These “cadres” (whoops, slip of the tongue there from the Massachusetts dame!) are to be trained to track the rest of us using apps etc. Horrifying. I cannot believe this is going on in Massachusetts!!! It just shows how the corona has eaten away brains.
So, watch out for the American red-white-and blue guards to descend on your community and haul off first the elderly, then children of those who “test positive,” then the parents, to “dignified enforced quarantine.”
Next up: Forcible vaxx-mit-chip.
Katherine
Washington and Beijing are moving towards war. Historically, when great powers have clashed over vital interests the outcome is conflict; all predict a favourable outcome for themselves. And it is the same today. Steve Bannon may envisage a “kinetic war” against China, a euphemistic term for world war, but he should look to history – as should everyone – to see that powers don’t always get the victory they are confident of.
https://www.ghostsofhistory.wordpress.com/
What is the Deep State? Who are part of it? The ones who conspired to overthrown the government while starting the RussiaHoax to cover their tracks (or accusation of what you have done yourself is the best defense)? This includes MSM, big companies and neocons who sponsor BLM; the ones who spied and attempted this coup d’ état (from Obama,Hillary C., James Comey, Brennan, Clapper, McCabe, Page, Strzok, S.Rice etc.etc.).
Who can know that they are still in charge? Why not expect something to come from the criminal investigations of these people by Durham, W.Barr?
Perception is often a function of confirmation bias particularly when the perceivers deem themselves exceptional with prime/sole agency (sometimes apparently with god on their side) thereby deeming others to have lesser or even no agency (being children of lesser gods or even atheists).
Some held and continue to hold that the Mr. Kissinger/Mr. Nixon’s president as madman routine was a major component in a strategy of tension, which in addition to apparent reproachment with the PRC, was a principal component in facilitating detente with the Soviet Union (who were obviously scared apparently since we the people hold these truths to be self-evident who in addition to conflate more with better)
This was deemed to be, and reproduced as, plausible belief, partly as a function of Mr. Kissinger/Mr. Nixon/and their advisors’ perceived requirements to bridge doubt about the outcomes of war in Indochina which included but was not limited to increased efforts in Cambodia and Laos not restricted to bombing.
However in significant part despite cautions from some of their advisors, many in the Politburo and some of their advisors in large assay viewed this through the prism of interactions from 1944 to 1970, including the withdrawl of missiles from Turkey to conclude the deal on Cuba; a.k.a in the West as the Cuban missile crisis.
Hence interpreted the data as affording an opportunity to gain further acceptance from the opponents on the status of the Soviet Union and recognition of its spheres of influence, whilst some others of their advisors, who had come to realise that the Soviet Union was not sustainable, and had cautioned on the possible outcomes of such a policy, also perceived in a limited way some of the opportunities of transcendence that would likely be afforded in such a scenario.
To implement a strategy of tension it is necessary that counterparties feel under tension as a consequence of such strategy, whilst lack of such perception of tension by counterparties tends to encourage over-extension by both as proved to be the case: partly why the suffix of gate is widely resorted to by some.
Among the blowback from that lack of perceptions of the other’s perceptions were the various efforts including coups in Africa and Latin America from 1970 onwards and the war in Afghanistan from 1979 with change of some participants after 1992, although to serve various purposes some opponents would cite different dates.
The attempted colour revolutions in the former Soviet Union added further encouragement to some participants in their pursuits of strategies of tension which are still attempted.
During the attempts at colour revolutions in the former Soviet Union and subsequent some perceived opportunities afforded by the would be revolutionaries if the would be revolutionaries were encouraged by a large assay of silence plus the Mr. Yeltsin/Mr. Zhirinovsky routines to become deeper enmazed in their beliefs and wishes which they deemed to be strategies.
After various attempts to bridge doubt by belief to attain confirmation bias, starting in 1994 the would be revolutionaries tested other hypotheses and became annoyed by 1996 resorting to apparently “fixing elections”, which subsequently over time was not seen to work at least by some, and so they resorted in some assay to bridging-doubt-by-beliefness and some to increasing tantrums.
“One must never lose track of the fundamental objectives of those who firmly control that assembly of bought and paid for patsies in Capitol Hill: to always privilege Divide and Rule – on class, race, identity politics.”
This is a conflation of strategy (fundamental objectives) and tactics (to priviledge Divide and Rule).
This conflation is quite popular but facilitates self- obfuscation to those who engage in it.
Less obfuscation can be achieved by rendering “fundamental objectives” as purpose and/or strategy, which in this instance is to limit challenge and change to/in prevailing social relations within linear paradigms/spectra, i.e. linear change a.k.a as reform and/or quantitative change (more or lessness in a linear sprectrum), tactics to facilitate this purpose/strategy of precluding qualitative change a.k.a as systemic change/transcendence of prevailing social relations, including but not limited to attempts at divide and rule.
One of the main self-obfuscations facilitated by the conflation of strategy with tactics lies in underming evaluation and contingent assignment/perception of significance, thereby limiting future tactical and strategic options through “self-perception management”.
This conflation contributed to the outcomes of many campaigns in the Great Patriotic War but progessively Stavka became more adept at differentiating and coordinating tactics and strategies to facilitate probably the most strategically significant campaign of the Great Patriotic War – Bagration (the liberation of Central, Eastern and South Eastern Europe) – whose significance was and continues to be subject to attempts at deflection by some seeking to enhance the strategic significance of the Normandy campaign and subsequent attributions/outcomes, including but not restricted to the use of atomic weapons on Japan and The Soviet Union’s campaign in Manchuria in August 1945..
Silicon Valley is being advised by the clandestine Covenant. SV is now the new political power in Washington, the seat of power is California.
Socialism has never gone against technology, it will lose. As soon as the unemployment numbers rise to a certain percentage the trap is sprung with most dependent on government handouts and Basic Income becomes Fully Automated Luxurious Communism. Corvid 19 and the rioting are a lounge act compared to what is coming and probably a means for practice.
To a degree socialism is good but here there will be no degrees. A country can win the world if their technology is best, they will go 100% for AI there will be no degrees.
You will probably be stripped of your assets if they are necessities for people without hope.
http://tennesseestar.com/2017/07/20/commentary-mark-zuckerbergs-communist-manifesto/
‘No one can ever make money off of real estate.’
That is an eyeopener homes/apts are to lose significant value that is if you are allowed to keep them. Not only can you not make a profit your customer base will be greatly reduced.
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/10/10/sam-altmans-manifest-
The quora answer was written by a realtor he omits the part about the U.S. rendering real assets worthless. It’s the comment by Greenup that is telling.
Shane Greenup, Founder of Basic Income Australia
People need homes. Supply and demand aside (ie: cities will always be
more expensive than country), all incentives to invest in property
should be taken away so that property is more accessible to people who
need it, rather than a vehicle for the wealthy to get wealthier.
18 Views
https://www.quora.com/How-would-universal-basic-income-affect-real-estate-prices-over-the-long-run
He (Sam Altman) is thinking about establishing a
group to prepare for our eventual successor, whether it be an A.I. or
an enhanced version of Homo sapiens. The idea would be to assemble
thinkers in robotics, cybernetics, quantum computing, A.I., synthetic
biology, genomics, and space travel, as well as philosophers, to
discuss the technology and the ethics of human replacement. For now,
leaders in those fields are meeting semi-regularly at Altman’s house;
the group jokingly calls itself the Covenant.
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/10/10/sam-altmans-manifest-destiny
We will lead unproductive lives grasping for our handouts like trained bears. Any hope will belong to the humans who submit to surgery.
SV is moving faster prompting Prince Charles to issue a warning. He also mentions communism a byproduct of SV’s agenda.
Prince Charles issues ROBOT WARNING: ‘I totally and utterly object’
PRINCE Charles has issued a warning over the rise of robotics – namely
the rise of “part human, part machine” hybrids.
The Prince of Wales made the Royal intervention in a GQ magazine
interview marking his forthcoming 70th birthday.
Charles said he “utterly” objected to the trend of people somehow
becoming “part human, part machine”.
He spoke to the magazine as the was presented with the Editor’s
Lifetime Achievement Award for services to philanthropy at the GQ Men
of the Year Awards.
The heir to the throne’s comments come amid the increasing popularity
of robotics in every industry – including military, domestic and sex.
Humans and machines are also becoming increasingly integrated with
things like augmented reality and plans for machine implants.
Prince Charles
Charles said: “The thing I find hardest now is to cope with this
extraordinary trend that somehow we must become part human, part
machine, which I totally and utterly object to.
“It is crazy to go that far because I think, ironically, the more AI
and robotics they want to introduce, the more people will rediscover
the importance of the traditional crafts, the directly human things
that are crafted by humans and not by machines.”
He is the cover star of the trendy publication’s October issue an was
speaking in a rare interview to its editor Dylan Jones.
Charles will celebrate his 70th birthday on November 14 – and will
take over the throne after passing of his mum Queen Elizabeth II, 92.
He went on to say in the interview: “You are accused of being
controversial just because you are trying to draw attention to things
that aren’t necessarily part of the conventional viewpoint.
“That’s not always a bad thing, but it’s odd because I have always
believed that living on a finite planet means we have to recognise
that this puts certain constraints and limits on our human ambition in
order to maintain the viability of the planet.
“That is why it matters so much that the way we operate has to be in
tune with the way nature and the universe works and not the way we
think it ought to work, which is what we have been doing.”
Charle’s rule is likely to oversee major steps forward in the
development of AI and robotics.
ROBOT HYBRIDS: Could humans really totally merge with machines?
Developments in the robotics are expected to cause millions of job
losses – taking over both skilled and unskilled labour.
Governor of the Bank of England Mark Carney issued a warning over the
rise in robotics in Britain.
He predicted robots taking over jobs would trigger mass unemployment
and wage stagnation in the UK.
Carney also predicted the development of robots could lead to a rise
in Communism – comparing today’s world to the first industrial
revolution.
With the Queen, aged 92, and the 96-year-old Duke of Edinburgh now
effectively retired, Charles’ role supporting his mother will become
increasingly important.
He highlighted there were still causes that needed championing.
He said: “My problem is I find there are too many things that need
doing or battling on behalf of, just the number of things that are
under threat all the time as a result of some fashion or other.
“I have seen it happen so often. It goes around for 20 or 25 years and
then you get a sudden panic as something has gone and then you try to
bring it back, at which point it costs a fortune, instead of trying to
maintain the things that are essential to our lives as human beings.”
@ at which point it costs a fortune, instead of trying to
maintain the things that are essential to our lives as human beings.”
Or just try to do both at once to cover all the bases.
What the Deep State fails to realize is that US society and eco system is breaking down and if this continues their ability to control things long after Trump has gone will be gone.
They have been living under the illusion for years since the 1990 that people will believe the big media outlets and swallow the diatribe that is fed to them. (like Al Queda terrorists with box cutters did WTC 911).
The break down really started in the 1970s with globalization but you could even trace it back to the 1940s or even 1920s with the MIC got control of most US politicians. Its got a lot worse since 1990 and the result of it is demonstrated when H Bush failed to be re-elected in 1992 because of the structurally weak US economy and he did nothing to address it in his term, like Carter in his term.
As things stand at the moment the 2 party state is about to implode. New parties will form from the decent people in them. Its also possible the US may break up into regions due to the polarization.
If the Deep State think they will get one of their people into POTUS then engage in more wars there will be no public support for them and the kids (including those to age 50) will bring the whole system down like a bunch of termites in a building (which is what has started already). Kids from the centre and right will join the current leftist ones. People are not living in a 1950s mindset anymore.
In essence there are both insiders and outsiders trying to destablize the US for different reasons.
China is the problem not Russia. Monetary and trade issues.
Some US corporations like China for low production costs and mega sales but there is a downside domestically. Others, particularly smaller domestic businesses, are being adversely effect via entities like Amazon.
And it is EU interests who want to steal Russia’s resources (as in 1812 & 1941) and want to use the US to do so.
All these conflicting interests and policies are driving all this chaos and decay and something has to be done to stablize it.
The DEM solution to the decay is put everyone on a $1000 a month social security payment which is akin to the famous 1791 statement in France of “Let them eat cake”.
The establishment GOP response is do little and let market forces work under the trickle down theory while they line the pockets of their friends with Govt contracts.
God Help America.
I would also add when you read articles like this you can see what Trump is up against.
Deep State trying to push their agenda and when it doesnt happen remove him.
But if they think they will replace him before Nov the rank and file won’t stand for it.
https://www.infowars.com/bolton-trump-wanted-to-grant-persecuted-white-south-african-farmers-asylum-and-citizenship/
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/lincoln-project-is-needling-trump-the-way-he-needled-hillary-over-her-emails-2020-06-22?siteid=bigcharts&dist=bigcharts