Download it for yourself while it is available and watch it.
Here is the link to it:
Link to video file.
Brought to your attention by commenter elmysterio
UPDATE:
You can watch the video clip with more detailed comments by “StormCloudsGathering” on YouTube.
Brought to your attention by commenter: samuelburke
dear Saker, please check it out!!
Police responsible for investigating the attack on ‘Charlie Hebdo’ commits suicide
http://actualidad.rt.com/actualidad/162726-francia-suicidio-policia-charlie-hebdo#.VK__zbzgSUM.facebook
It looks like the shot missed. Victim played dead and perhaps died from previous hits?
What was the caliber of the weapon used? 5.56 or 7.62? Also what part of the body was hit? There is a huge difference between the two in how a body responds to a gunshot wound. Before making claims, it’s good to know a few facts first.
I suspect this is one of those distraction gambits, like the toss claiming the Boston attack was a hoax involving actors and special effects, in order to discredit serious analysis. Given the submitter and what I’ve seen from them over the years, at ICH and elsewhere, I’d bet money on that.
Taken and updated from ZH by jefferson32:
Some model of this weapon don’t have a lot of recoil. The person is shot through the neck, not the head, so no big Hollywood splatter.
Seems to be much the same people calling “fake” and “actors” on most atrocities. Their problem is that they can accept the government wanting to scare us with an atrocity, but can’t see that same government being prepared to kill a few real people for the purpose…. despite being prepared to bomb and drone millions.
Microscopic slo-mo examinations of images also distracts from looking for WHICH government and why.
So why is there no blood whatsoever from the previous shots?
Cognitive dissonance will not allow some to see what is evident in this video, it would be too disruptive of their world view. It is too frightening a proposition to have to consider that what the eyes see in this video might actually have been staged. There are other examples from the last decade for those who really have not been watching the movie.
Security theatre.
Also, dear Trolls wasting time with your silly drivel, JFK’s head never really exploded nor did MLK, Jr die. It was all tricks done by magicians and British special effects professionals from the cinema industry.
The cop on the sidewalk, JFK and Martin Luther King Jr. are all alive and well, living on an island in the Caribbean, drinking mojitos and frolicking with nubile young women of easy persuasion.
It’s the truth, really, I swear.
Note to Saker and the moderators. This topic is the low point of the Vineyard. To make this asinine topic a reality is to debase all the nobel subjects that have graced this blog.
Shame.
Please think about this: put yourself in the situation of an amateur that’s filming this event. Don’t you think you would be kind of shocked when the policeman is shot in the head and you would say something like “My God !!! or Mon Dieu !!!” ?. The person filming seems pretty calm and continues to follow the tow brothers only. Personally, it feels like he expected the shooting in the head. And why did he stop filming after the brothers left with the car. I would have focused on the policeman, I would have shouted for first medical help. However, I don not exclude that after these questions raised by me to become mainstream, to see another video showing the aftermath of that scene. It is very bizarre that it was not part of it from the beginning.
Can we ask for an international inquiry in this event, given the fact that the entire world is being inflamed by the mass-media ? We do have a right to demand for more facts since, at least most of the EU presidents are going tomorrow to this rally, therefore implicating the entire Eu population into an event who raises many questions.
Can we check carefully the identities of the victims and maybe some of their relatives connections ?
I want to point to another detail regarding the mirrors of the car: they look white in a picture than black in another one. Their upper half is covered with chrome, therefore they reflect the nearby light and if you look from above they might seem white (reflecting the sky), but if you look from the side they might look black. Just be careful, this detail might be leading us on purpose on a wrong conspiracy theory.
Since I studied the Boston bombing for months, I can give you some details to be aware:
– the two brothers were FBI-CIA assets, they had lucury cars without any job
– they were part of chechen netwroks trained by CIA
– their uncle is a big-shot living in Washington-DC (high upscale area) involved in some oil companies
– apparently they were called by CIA to take part in a drill on the day of the bombing (if the Kourachi brothers were affiliated wit AL-CIA-da, we can investigate if they were also told to take part in some kind of drill with the aim of catching others)
– many of the witnesses and victims from the Boston bombing turned out to be so called “crisis actors”; especially one women was proven to have been used several times in this event and even the Sandy Hook
I repeat again: please start a HUGE DEMAND WORLDWIDE for a public investigation with a HUGE commission in which there should be many independent members from various countries !!!
You might be interested in the follow-up update of the article which displays the video showing the shooting incident. The link brings you directly to it.
The AK 47 ballistics at that range creates a through and through (hits the sidewalk and ricochets) and leaves a pencil size opening. Look it up. Ask an expert on military ballistics.
Watermelons from distance explode.
Distance means the bullet begins to yaw and then it tears up flesh and spews blood with matter.
This is all phony bs by people who know nothing.
Trace the line of the muzzle to the moment of the ricochet and you have direct hit at the neck.
When you bring me authoritative experts who know what reality not fantasy is and they agree with this pseudo crapola then it’s worthy of posting.
Check out some of the wounds from Donbass militia. Even Grahamn Phillips wound isn’t massive watermelon splatter.
A high velocity round drills a hole and exits many parts of the body when shot at that short distance.
Since it was expected by everyone from video games and action films consumed by the thousands of hours and it was not a head shot with a dumb dumb shell or mercury load meant to blast apart the target, you all think something is amiss.
It’s pure waste of the Vineyard.
Like the planes never hit the towers. It was an optical illusion. Total nonsense.
Total cult troll work wasting everyone’s time. We have important issues to deal with, not this kindergarten weak-minded blather.
As for analyzing film effects, I’ll put my years of experience and the millions of frames of film my eyes have seen up close, passing between by hands against anyone on this planet. Anyone!
Oh, I also have owned an AK 47 and an SKS shooting the same ammo (2000 rounds or so).
Have you?
I can understand your indignation but I think that you miss the point in this matter…
The point is not whether the bullet did hit or miss him in some body part. The point is the fact that the mass media has sold this incident to the public (and to the comrades of that police officer) as a police officer being shot in the head. That is clearly not the case and those in the mass media who produced this lie can also clearly see it for themselves in this video.
It was falsified deliberately and in addition to that they show this video all over the place with a blur over it as if the scene was too graphic to be shown unedited. As you can see for yourself in this uncut version, there is not much of a graphic scene that would need to be blurred over. Blurring it over simply helps to imply what people are meant to see in this scene instead of showing it to them in an uncut version as we are doing it right here. It’s a tactic of “Make-believe”.
As Andy stated, he was shot in the head.
Does one die instantaneously from a neck wound? Would he not be alive for a tens of seconds as he thrashed?
It has the same hall marks as other false flags ( search “by jefferson32”). If it wasn’t a false flag, it’s blow back.
Yeah well building seven fainted into it’s footprint without a plane. It was an engineering failure of epic proportions if it was not brought down professionally with detonation.
Show me the plane that hit tower seven.
I would be very surprised if building seven was not wired. To me it ranks with a paper shredder as an elementary precaution in a site containing vast amounts of secret information.
I’m sure there are wired CIA sites all over the world and instructions to blow them if they can no longer be secured.
So what?
Cassandra, have you read Judy Woods’ book “Where Did the Towers Go”?
Conspiracy theories that ignore the possibility of sloppy, cynical reporting should be ignored. There are no dedicated reporters or editors in the MSM — if one is discovered s/he is fired. Getting it right doesn’t sell subscriptions or generate clicks. So they aren’t trying to do it.
The Tienanmen Square Massacre hoax, huge, international and enduring as it was, did not result from a conspiracy but from the degenerate nature of the modern media. While the students were filing out of the square without a shot being fired, a leader of one of the groups demonstrating sent out a hoax report of students being machine-gunned in the square. It was printed in two papers and picked up by everyone that saw it. Stringers and correspondents on the story were awakened by hysterical editors screaming at them that if they didn’t have coverage on their desk in an hour the journalist would never work in the industry again.
The media had been dreaming and praying for this story, disguised as “fearing,” so the ground was ripe for it to take root and flourish. Journalists thought “Omigod, I’m assigned to the biggest story in the world, it takes place under my nose, and somehow I missed it!” They ran out to find a copy, rewrote with a few made-up details added, and sent it in.
It’s not exactly a secret. Many of the journalists have confessed, particularly during an investigation by the Columbia School of Journalism, probably started by somebody researching an MA thesis. Every time a politician is due to attend a ceremony in Tienanmen, a protest will be turned aside by somebody, Kerry most recently, whispering “There never was anybody killed there.”
A theory based on press reports is resting on the shakiest of foundations. You can’t rely on anything that enhances the reporter’s career or the news outlet’s circulation. At least track back until you get the facts as published on an official government website. Then we may be entering conspiracy territory.
Another detail with high chances to be included in the next Hollywood movie for idiots (not to mention the laughing detail about conveniently leaving the ID in the car, after so much hassle with covering their faces): these two brothers had AK47 weapons + rocket launcher (therefore some more accomplices with good networks), they had bullet-proof vests, a potentially expensive car, but they had no plan and money to run away after the killings ! They had to rob a gas station (one of the most risky target) instead of some obscure shop (they could have gone for an algerian shop, there are plenty in Paris). How come they were suddenly on their own after such an well organized hit (no plans for some hideouts) ???
The most simple plan for running away would have been to jump in a train to Germany, Spain, Italy or UK (there are plenty from Paris).
Just some food for thought: if you are a secret service with two clueless arabic brothers that you want to infiltrate in Alqaida (at least that is what you keep telling to these wannabe 007-agents). What will be the best method to increase their credibility in the eyes of Alqaida leaders ? I think having them taking part in some sort of action is really high up there in the list. I think this is exactly what they were told: to not be afraid and take part in some well-scripted event before they are shipped to Syria or Yemen. What these clueless wannabe 007 agents don’t know is that they will be sacrificed and grilled alive at any moment (like it did happened with the clueless Tsaranev brothers, just another pair of chechen idiots). The fact these brothers were convicted before makes them even more perfect for such missions because they can be easily blackmailed with prison if they don’t execute.
Another question: how exactly took place the action in that street with the killed policeman ? Was it the same street where with the office of Charlie paper ? Was it another street where the two guys just stopped to randomly kill a policeman ?
Another question: why the narrative keeps changing on-the-fly ? That woman that apparently was in the shop killing hostages, now she is in Syria. Come on, what the f… ? That 18-year old driver that initially was driving the getaway car, was that another would-be patsie, but they had to change the script on-the-fly ? WTF ?
How about Alaida from Yemen coming up with statements after 2 days ? It smells too much as, again, changing the script “on-the-fly”.
Expect more changes to the stinking story !!! I can bet 1 million shekels on it.
Another interesting detail is emerging among the people analyzing the shooting of the policeman: look carefully at the front left wheel of the car and you will see a dark line suddenly showing up in the frames when the two brothers are returning to the car (it was not there when they were going towards the policeman). Some think that they had to film a few more scenes and make sure the car is at the same position. It would be nice to discover what exactly was that big white minivan doing in the area and who owns it. Was a typical secret service team inside it ?
This story is getting more and more weird.
Someone should really make a full first-page article with all the inconsistencies and hard questions, sooner later than later !!!
Download the video from here before it goes away: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bc6_1420632668
They won’t be able to make new scenes now.
Please start an inquiry among the french people that were in the area at the time. This is crucial for the entire world at this moment.
That was a real policeman killed, his name is Ahmed Merabet, he is dead. Here is his brother giving eulogy http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/10/charlie-hebdo-policeman-murder-ahmed-merabet
Nothing in that video to make a conclusion it is fake.
(Tiny white spot moving back is likely from cartridge exiting. Dust cloud in front, likely bullet exiting through a body and hitting pavement; or another bullet He is down on the pavement –so not much movement. Head and neck turn and get covered from view; we do not really see there. Shooter is moving quickly so it does not look as recoil in the movies).
What is also very strange is the following; the West (including France) has been attacking Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Syria, Libya, Syria, Somalia. All muslim countries. Also, Israel has been slaugthering Palestines for many decades and the West looks the other way, or protects the Israelis. Now the Muslims wants to revenge a satirical magazine? So, offending Mohammed is worse then slauthering, torturing and maiming millions of fellow muslims? Why did they attack a satirical magazine and not the army, police, or some members of the government? Which would be more logical, according to me.
But… what would the story be? If they killed some military men, its a tragedy and they spent maybe 10 min to cover the story. Now a satirical magazine is attacked and the whole western world tumbles over for days talking about freedom of speech, democracy. For days any news program, talk show talks about “freedom of speech”, “je suis Charlie”. And what a tragedy the muslims did to us.
It doesn’t make sense. This smells…
Very disappointed to see this nonsense here. It was reasonable for people first seeing this video to think something was strange. Media reported shot in the head (clearly was in neck/shoulder), no muzzle flash (perfectly normal), no recoil (single round is minimal and while moving impossible to determine), no cartridge discharged (moves to fast to see), no impact on victim (high velocity round can impart negligible transfer of momentum), no blood (such wounds, depending on where hit, can bleed very little, enough so that clothes might contain, at least in begining). So there were some strange things but all of them were easily explained, anyone with ballistics knowledge was aware of them and the scene was available for peopel to check, so any suspciion should have quickly faded away.
To suggest instead that the death of one out of so many victims was staged is utterly ridiculous – unless such claims offer far better evidence. Was the real officer killed elsewhere? Was his family in on it? Was his funeral faked? Scepiticism is ALWAYS a good thing, when it fails to be rational it is no longer skepticism, it is wishful thinking that hopes for a scenario you desire.
The dead policeman was only tangentially related to the case, had a history of depression and a colleague who killed himself the same way, could not have found anything of relevance from what he was doing and could not have been targeted by a clean-up team so quickly.
The stains on the ground mentioned above were clearly oil stains from another vehicle (likely one hit by rounds form the attackers), the flow with the pavement creases and fade in and out of sight due to the focusing of the video camera.
I’ve seen similar posts elsewhere by people hungry for evidence of a more dramatic plot (e.g. StormCloudsGathering) and while questions regarding it are perfectly reasonable , many seem to deliberately resist accepting teh far more rational answers available. This doesn’t mean that Western intelligence were not involved in abetting or directing the attackers, that possibility is a valid path of enquiry. The above video, however, is only likely to divert people from such practical investigation and render the latter far less credible. Again, sad to see it here when answers to all questions raised are easily available.