Thank you to the translators and what a lovely woman she is. I can see some long lost Tatar blood in her face and eyes. Is she Ukrainian? Pro- Russian Russian – speaking Ukrainian?
Lucky I saw this , as I had no idea Ukraine was making claims of already fighting for the south , or even taking some settlements for that matter!
She is Ukrainian. There’s a recently banned political party Shariya in Ukraine, Anatoly Shariy is the chief of that party. They probably live in Catalonia, I believe.
The alleged upcoming counteroffensive in southern Ukraine is a virtual reality stunt that is a reaction the imminent defeat of Ukraine in Donetsk (Seversk, Slavyansk etc.). USA/Ukraine wants to stage some sort of TET OFFENSIVE(where the North Vietnamese lost militarily but won BIG in the information war realm).
If Russia was evicted from Kherson, it would be an utter humiliation. Russia will never let it happen.
The most that will happen is that tens of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers will act like lemmings and “jump off the cliff” ie. commit suicide by charging Russian defenses.
Says experts and officials make it clear that hundreds of HIMARS are needed…
That’s obvious to laymen too. That announcing the sending of 13 as if it were a big deal gives the laymen a bad impression, of irresolution, of politicking in some way, suggests that it surely must give definite impressions to experts. Yeah, “hundreds and hundreds” would be needed to win or stop Russia with those. However, if sending 13 is such a big deal, then it’s kind of like suggesting that hundreds will not be sent or that they do not want to send that many (hard). They are waiting to negotiate later, but Putin said that later it will be harder and that’s obvious for even laymen. The actions of the West are not yet backing up the words (most of the money allotted remains unspent). That’s not surprising, and negotiations might begin sooner rather than later. The parties only sign when they agree anyway… The fallback nature of the new “negotiations” position announced by Biden in the NYT has this blinding effect, that is, in the shift from victory to stalemate, the negotiations are tied to a “stalemate” (an illusion!). Without the fallback position that replaced the initial expectation/hope of victory for Ukraine over Russia, there’s the recognition that Ukraine cannot defeat Russia and then the negotiations naturally happen quickly without waiting anymore for another impossible expectation to come true. As always, the sooner an error is recognized and fixed the better it is! (There is no gain in being disoriented.)
Is she reading? Interesting video. I learned more about her, where she’s at, than about the war, but that’s really great, thanks. .
No one dares say anything against the alluring and drop-dead luscious Olga Shariy, all the worlds pedophiles and all the worlds military industrial manufactures, users and shooters will only nod their heads in silent accord before her wide eyed and innocent blinking, faultless and charming Russian articulation of the Military Operation, it’s a man’s world, or is it ?
Socrates, (469–399 B.C.E.) : First, then, whether the question is to be put in jest or in earnest, let us come to an understanding about the nature of woman: Is she capable of sharing either wholly or partially in the actions of men, or not at all? And is the art of war one of those arts in which she can or can not share? That will be the best way of commencing the inquiry, and will probably lead to the fairest conclusion.”
She would really rule; she better not get angry in her rule.
What a gift this portly (is it only me or is he the only one who looks really elegant? The others look like they’re going to a costume party), well-mannered, experienced Russian president is! Imagine if a Stalin were the one there (a real one). Or even Patrushev, who was lauded in the Western media as the most likely successor to Putin even though he is number 2 to Medvedev in their Security Council. I would not favor him because he espoused, in an interview, a “1945” denazification which I think Putin would not even come close to applying. This gift was rejected. Since politics is a craft (noble as such), the same ones then gifted him Crimea, Donbass, and they continue on the same path. So bad are they at it, they persist on the same path. Would it not have been better to just accept him as a gift? I say “yes”, but I’m not Russian. Is Putin himself aware that he is being given a lot of valuable opportunities that might not have been there? I have no quotes, but I have no doubt of it. Using basic psychology, when Putin and Lavrov criticize the 2014 “coup” in Ukraine as often as they have, without saying a word about their regaining of Crimea as a direct result, it means that when they are together, and talking, they laugh and celebrate (“thanks to…”).
Excellent video & observations.
It is so much better having a video only using sub-titles & which does not interfere with the speaker by translating / speaking over them.
In times of war, lies and deception are used as weapons by all sides and we shouldn’t even expect the truth but consider lies to be like hand grenades or napalm or other weapons. Downright unpleasant, but just part of the war routine.
And when it comes to military secrets, disinformation, and covert operations, of course the biggest secrets and lies occur in the uppermost ranks of the military and the political sphere. Common soldiers are not in the loop and for the sake of ultimate victory must often be lied to, misinformed, and, on occasion, even be put in harm’s way to maintain an important deception.
Observing Zalensky, and based on my 70 years of experience having lived all over the world in many different cultures, and having known both honest people and liars in countless situations, some of which were of the covert sort, I have come to the conclusion that Zalensky is playing a role, and that nothing he does or says is ever a genuine reflection of his true character or personality.
So, in my opinion, either he’s a compulsive liar that somehow incredibly ended up as a chief of state and he’s just blundering through, or else, he’s a dedicated spy or something else totally dishonest playing a role in cover so deep that he’s essentially all alone.
It does seem to me that his ‘raison d’être’ is not to defend Ukraine or its people, but rather to cost the US as much as possible and to acquire as much high tech ordinance from the US as possible, all the while juggling exaggerations of military successes and also of losses to maintain a fine line of maximum support. Presenting his forces as being almost supurhuman fighters but still overwhelmed by the sheer quantity of enemy firepower. Always on the verge of great victories if only they had a few more billion dollar’s worth of the latest equipment. And when they get it, immediately they need more.
To sum it up, I’m not really sure which side Zalensky is on. If he’s really all that pro-west, he seems to be one of those friends that can stand in for enemies whenever needed. He’s breaking the American bank.
That he’s totally insincere, I’m sure of. But exactly where his true allegiance lies, I don’t know.
Given his unmistakable insincerity I would have expected him to flee the country if his motives were entirely selfish. The fact that he’s still around makes me think he’s driven by a cause. But I don’t believe even for a second that that cause has anything to do with helping the Ukrainian people. He’s sacrificing them.
Olga Shariy gives substantive reasons for thinking that the Kherson counteroffensive is an elaborate deception to be inserted into the Western propaganda barrage for maximum impact on US/UK/EU policymakers and Western public opinion. Since Zelensky handed internal governance of Ukraine to the ultra Nationalists and Neonazis and external affairs to the CIA and MI6 we can conclude that this imminent UVL victory roll has a phantasmic origin literally in the hybrid charged imagination of the CIA and MI6 handlers and the fascist racial ideology of the UkroNazis which cannot envisage defeat by an inferior enemy. In reality they are convinced against much of the evidence that an open spigot of Western advanced weaponry and superior NATO trained forces will be their salivation in the longer term. Meanwhile to maintain support and morale they must invent present and future victories lest the banality of their sacrifice and propaganda is exposed!
Not to long ago there was a nazi leader giving orders from a bunker in Berlin, commanding non existent military battalions into battle against the Soviet troops storming Berlin. That didn’t work out very well for the nazi then and it won’t work out well this time.
Yeah, it’s hard for Ukraine’s leadership to accept its own mad errors now. Anyone who cares or wants to contemplate such political madness can watch them now. It’s amazing.
The comparison with Germany’s case reminds me of something Albert Speer, Hitler’s architect, wrote in his main book about the Third Reich, which was that once the war started, at some point all that happened, at the very top of the regime, was what had to happen; in other words, that it was like a road they could not get out of and had to continue in to the end; I understood his point to be that even sane people could not then do much else. To best detect the madness of Germany’s leader back then, I think that one should consider the 1939 moment of decisions-actions and 1941. There is no sign that Hitler ever accepted his error. In the morning of the day he died, he blamed the Generals for the defeat. At lunch, he basically said that Germany would one day understand that he only sought to help. Just before he went into his study room to commit suicide, he shook his valet’s (Linge’s) hand and then did the Nazi salute. Linge saluted too and then asked Hitler who or what they should fight for now. Hitler answered, “For the new man.” Hitler had a philosophy and a political party for more than 10 years prior to becoming Chancellor. Maybe only Ukrainians can explain why Zelensky was chosen by them, besides the fact they must have lacked clear and better options (don’t we all).
Thank you to the translators and what a lovely woman she is. I can see some long lost Tatar blood in her face and eyes. Is she Ukrainian? Pro- Russian Russian – speaking Ukrainian?
Lucky I saw this , as I had no idea Ukraine was making claims of already fighting for the south , or even taking some settlements for that matter!
She’s Russian. I can’t hear any Ukrainian accent, although I’m not a native speaker so take with a grain of salt.
She is Ukrainian. There’s a recently banned political party Shariya in Ukraine, Anatoly Shariy is the chief of that party. They probably live in Catalonia, I believe.
I take it she from the Donbas?
The alleged upcoming counteroffensive in southern Ukraine is a virtual reality stunt that is a reaction the imminent defeat of Ukraine in Donetsk (Seversk, Slavyansk etc.). USA/Ukraine wants to stage some sort of TET OFFENSIVE(where the North Vietnamese lost militarily but won BIG in the information war realm).
If Russia was evicted from Kherson, it would be an utter humiliation. Russia will never let it happen.
The most that will happen is that tens of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers will act like lemmings and “jump off the cliff” ie. commit suicide by charging Russian defenses.
Nailed it sir.
The only weapon it seems the WEST is truly an unmatched super-power is Propaganda.
And we seem to have trained the Ukrainians well.
Says experts and officials make it clear that hundreds of HIMARS are needed…
That’s obvious to laymen too. That announcing the sending of 13 as if it were a big deal gives the laymen a bad impression, of irresolution, of politicking in some way, suggests that it surely must give definite impressions to experts. Yeah, “hundreds and hundreds” would be needed to win or stop Russia with those. However, if sending 13 is such a big deal, then it’s kind of like suggesting that hundreds will not be sent or that they do not want to send that many (hard). They are waiting to negotiate later, but Putin said that later it will be harder and that’s obvious for even laymen. The actions of the West are not yet backing up the words (most of the money allotted remains unspent). That’s not surprising, and negotiations might begin sooner rather than later. The parties only sign when they agree anyway… The fallback nature of the new “negotiations” position announced by Biden in the NYT has this blinding effect, that is, in the shift from victory to stalemate, the negotiations are tied to a “stalemate” (an illusion!). Without the fallback position that replaced the initial expectation/hope of victory for Ukraine over Russia, there’s the recognition that Ukraine cannot defeat Russia and then the negotiations naturally happen quickly without waiting anymore for another impossible expectation to come true. As always, the sooner an error is recognized and fixed the better it is! (There is no gain in being disoriented.)
Is she reading? Interesting video. I learned more about her, where she’s at, than about the war, but that’s really great, thanks. .
I could watch her for hours …
No one dares say anything against the alluring and drop-dead luscious Olga Shariy, all the worlds pedophiles and all the worlds military industrial manufactures, users and shooters will only nod their heads in silent accord before her wide eyed and innocent blinking, faultless and charming Russian articulation of the Military Operation, it’s a man’s world, or is it ?
Socrates, (469–399 B.C.E.) : First, then, whether the question is to be put in jest or in earnest, let us come to an understanding about the nature of woman: Is she capable of sharing either wholly or partially in the actions of men, or not at all? And is the art of war one of those arts in which she can or can not share? That will be the best way of commencing the inquiry, and will probably lead to the fairest conclusion.”
She would really rule; she better not get angry in her rule.
What a gift this portly (is it only me or is he the only one who looks really elegant? The others look like they’re going to a costume party), well-mannered, experienced Russian president is! Imagine if a Stalin were the one there (a real one). Or even Patrushev, who was lauded in the Western media as the most likely successor to Putin even though he is number 2 to Medvedev in their Security Council. I would not favor him because he espoused, in an interview, a “1945” denazification which I think Putin would not even come close to applying. This gift was rejected. Since politics is a craft (noble as such), the same ones then gifted him Crimea, Donbass, and they continue on the same path. So bad are they at it, they persist on the same path. Would it not have been better to just accept him as a gift? I say “yes”, but I’m not Russian. Is Putin himself aware that he is being given a lot of valuable opportunities that might not have been there? I have no quotes, but I have no doubt of it. Using basic psychology, when Putin and Lavrov criticize the 2014 “coup” in Ukraine as often as they have, without saying a word about their regaining of Crimea as a direct result, it means that when they are together, and talking, they laugh and celebrate (“thanks to…”).
Excellent video & observations.
It is so much better having a video only using sub-titles & which does not interfere with the speaker by translating / speaking over them.
In times of war, lies and deception are used as weapons by all sides and we shouldn’t even expect the truth but consider lies to be like hand grenades or napalm or other weapons. Downright unpleasant, but just part of the war routine.
And when it comes to military secrets, disinformation, and covert operations, of course the biggest secrets and lies occur in the uppermost ranks of the military and the political sphere. Common soldiers are not in the loop and for the sake of ultimate victory must often be lied to, misinformed, and, on occasion, even be put in harm’s way to maintain an important deception.
Observing Zalensky, and based on my 70 years of experience having lived all over the world in many different cultures, and having known both honest people and liars in countless situations, some of which were of the covert sort, I have come to the conclusion that Zalensky is playing a role, and that nothing he does or says is ever a genuine reflection of his true character or personality.
So, in my opinion, either he’s a compulsive liar that somehow incredibly ended up as a chief of state and he’s just blundering through, or else, he’s a dedicated spy or something else totally dishonest playing a role in cover so deep that he’s essentially all alone.
It does seem to me that his ‘raison d’être’ is not to defend Ukraine or its people, but rather to cost the US as much as possible and to acquire as much high tech ordinance from the US as possible, all the while juggling exaggerations of military successes and also of losses to maintain a fine line of maximum support. Presenting his forces as being almost supurhuman fighters but still overwhelmed by the sheer quantity of enemy firepower. Always on the verge of great victories if only they had a few more billion dollar’s worth of the latest equipment. And when they get it, immediately they need more.
To sum it up, I’m not really sure which side Zalensky is on. If he’s really all that pro-west, he seems to be one of those friends that can stand in for enemies whenever needed. He’s breaking the American bank.
That he’s totally insincere, I’m sure of. But exactly where his true allegiance lies, I don’t know.
Given his unmistakable insincerity I would have expected him to flee the country if his motives were entirely selfish. The fact that he’s still around makes me think he’s driven by a cause. But I don’t believe even for a second that that cause has anything to do with helping the Ukrainian people. He’s sacrificing them.
You have an interesting theory on Zelensky’s true motivations, it does have me thinking.
Thanks.
Olga Shariy gives substantive reasons for thinking that the Kherson counteroffensive is an elaborate deception to be inserted into the Western propaganda barrage for maximum impact on US/UK/EU policymakers and Western public opinion. Since Zelensky handed internal governance of Ukraine to the ultra Nationalists and Neonazis and external affairs to the CIA and MI6 we can conclude that this imminent UVL victory roll has a phantasmic origin literally in the hybrid charged imagination of the CIA and MI6 handlers and the fascist racial ideology of the UkroNazis which cannot envisage defeat by an inferior enemy. In reality they are convinced against much of the evidence that an open spigot of Western advanced weaponry and superior NATO trained forces will be their salivation in the longer term. Meanwhile to maintain support and morale they must invent present and future victories lest the banality of their sacrifice and propaganda is exposed!
Not to long ago there was a nazi leader giving orders from a bunker in Berlin, commanding non existent military battalions into battle against the Soviet troops storming Berlin. That didn’t work out very well for the nazi then and it won’t work out well this time.
Yeah, it’s hard for Ukraine’s leadership to accept its own mad errors now. Anyone who cares or wants to contemplate such political madness can watch them now. It’s amazing.
The comparison with Germany’s case reminds me of something Albert Speer, Hitler’s architect, wrote in his main book about the Third Reich, which was that once the war started, at some point all that happened, at the very top of the regime, was what had to happen; in other words, that it was like a road they could not get out of and had to continue in to the end; I understood his point to be that even sane people could not then do much else. To best detect the madness of Germany’s leader back then, I think that one should consider the 1939 moment of decisions-actions and 1941. There is no sign that Hitler ever accepted his error. In the morning of the day he died, he blamed the Generals for the defeat. At lunch, he basically said that Germany would one day understand that he only sought to help. Just before he went into his study room to commit suicide, he shook his valet’s (Linge’s) hand and then did the Nazi salute. Linge saluted too and then asked Hitler who or what they should fight for now. Hitler answered, “For the new man.” Hitler had a philosophy and a political party for more than 10 years prior to becoming Chancellor. Maybe only Ukrainians can explain why Zelensky was chosen by them, besides the fact they must have lacked clear and better options (don’t we all).