Open Thread

The clash between Russia and the West (who use Ukraine as a pretext) seems at times like a clash between a long gone European civilization (represented by Russia) and a globalist power that has successfully killed the last moral vestiges of the European civilization (which was not perfect but still possessed “values”).
This is in evidence in the strenuous efforts of the Russian military operation not only to avoid civilian casualties but also to spare civilian infrastructures, while the Ukrainian mercenaries, para- and ostensibly military mine roads, explode buildings with human shield hostages in them and instigate assassinations.

“English gentlemen, you shoot first!” (« Messieurs les Anglais, tirez les premiers ! »)— is the famous phrase associated with the battle of Fontenoy, on 5/11/1745 between an English (allied with Austrian and Dutch) army led by William of Cumberland and a French army led by Maurice de Saxe. Allegedly (and as also described by Voltaire), the two commanders facing each other first respectfully saluted each other by doffing their hats and then Cumberland chivalrously invited the French to shoot first. De Saxe declined inviting the English to shoot first.

Russia, this is not 1745, it is 2022, and the puppeteers of Ukraine have been shooting first for too long!

A few days ago I argued that Ukraine is for World War III what Poland was for World War II:

FacebookTwitterVKEmailCopy LinkShare
Once upon a time, stop me if you’ve heard this story before, Anglo diplomats surveyed the ruins of a fallen empire, and hatched a nefarious plan. They insisted on the creation of a militaristic right-wing pseudostate, with borders drawn up in a way that would be deliberately provocative to her neighbors. Then the Western powers all swore that this weird artificial state had inviolable sovereignty and signed unenforceable mutual defense pacts with her. Just creating this imaginary country was a weird and stupid idea, and that decision was made even more weird and stupid by the following mutual defense agreements. Even a small border dispute would immediately and inevitably erupt into a world war, and of course that’s exactly what happened.

If you think I’m talking about 1991 Ukraine, you are correct, but also not correct. I’m talking about 1919 Poland.

Let’s talk about the notorious Molotov-Ribbentrop protocols, Russia’s “moral failure” that the entire western media has spent the last 80 years whining about. I’m not going to go into extreme detail now, so if you want to read more, browse the post I wrote here. But why do we whine about the Soviet Union “allying” with Hitler, but not everyone else? I have some ideas, for now, consider these basic, indisputable facts.

https://readingjunkie.com/2022/03/18/is-ukraine-the-new-poland/

https://www.rt.com/russia/552392-ukrainian-doctor-denies-castration/

I’m sorry, I have to bring this up..This article about the head of the military medical service calling for the castration of the Russian soldiers made me feel literally sick. It was the first thing I read this morning. Now he’s denying it stating it was an emotional outburst and it isn’t true. At least since this twisted creature said it out loud for the world to hear this likely will not happen.

Too bad you SICK SON OF A BITCH! He did mean it. It is typical of his tribe. Their resentment and hatred is repulsive. That is even too kind. I hope Russia has put the word out that if they touch even one hair on their soldiers heads they will cease to breathe air. He, is a dead man walking. God willing.

I have a suggestion for an ongoing column here for the Saker.

“The Stupid, it burns!”

should be a column for all the over-the-top and Russophobic idiocy that we’re seeing these days.

e.g.

– banning Yuri Gagarin’s name from a space conference
– shutting down a literary course on Doestoyevsky
– changing the name of food items that have the word “Russia” in it
– forcing sports athletes to denounce their own country
– (today) banning Crimean GM Sergei Karjakin from playing chess

and so on.

These are very hard to digest. Are these true figures or just an exaggeration?

We are standing at an inflection point in history, and there can be no bystanders. Everyone needs to help. Here’s what you can do to turn the tide of the information war against global nazism. And by “help,” I don’t mean vapid “thoughts and prayers.” I’m talking about real, practical things every person reading this can do that will have a meaningful impact in the war.

How YOU can help win the war against nazism
https://readingjunkie.com/2022/03/21/how-you-can-help-win-the-war-against-nazism/

Link to original post:
https://www.ricognizioni.it/un-kafe-con-dostoevskij-contro-il-logorio-del-nichilismo-moderno/

Automatic translation:
A kafè with Dostoevsky. Against the wear and tear of modern nihilism
By
Alessandro Gnocchi
March 18, 2022

It is called Kafè Dosto ‘ and it is, as we say today, a space to talk about Dostoevsky and maybe even converse with him, with his life, his thought, his works and his faith. The fundamental intent is to give back to Fëdor Michajlovič the word that these days is not only denied him, but, even worse, changed in meaning and spirit.

Here at Ricognizioni , the idea had been in the air for some time and now it does not become trivial in stigmatizing the censorship of the Bicocca University on the greatest novelist that Providence has given us poor mortals. However, it must be recognized that the news often manifests the signs of the times beyond any hidden intention, today metaphysically so disturbing. The case is known and does not make it possible to summarize it, if not in the conditioned thought that lies at the bottom. Dosto’s fault, as everyone knows by now, is to represent a summit of Russian culture now that the so-called civilized world “one morning / woke up / and found the invader”: Russian, of course, because times change even if the idiots remain. Thus the former ex-public opinion, after having been covidcentric for two years, has now suddenly found itself Ukrainocentric.

This West, crazily waning without even realizing it, is now happily sick with russophobia and sees in Dostoevsky’s censorship a good exercise in muscle awakening for the collective intellectual. He mistakes for a sign of health yet another metastasis of a deeper and darker disease that the great Russian had diagnosed more than a century and a half ago and is called nihilism. But it is not only Dosto’s censors who suffer from it, too many sufferers, too many censors of the censors, jealous guardians of a hairy freedom in charge of granting the word as long as it is said within the networks of the dominant culture.

I am not interested in raging on the poor arguments of the magnificent rector of the Milanese university, or magnificent rector since in these barbaric times it is customary for a woman to say this. I have reached an age where it is understood that the grotesque has no limits except in the infernal abysses where no word has any more meaning. And then, even looking at the horror of the intellect from a distance is never a healthy exercise. Nor do I think it interesting to go into the details of the course on Dostoevsky first denied, then postponed, then granted but only if accompanied by the reading of Ukrainian authors and then taken by the owner elsewhere. We are in the context of the trinariciutismo in his time so well stigmatized by Guareschi that no smallness of intellect can really catch us unprepared.

In presenting Kafè Dosto ‘ , I am more anxious to mention another intellectual sewage, actually coming from the same sewer, but from a deeper, darker and more dangerous branch. I am referring to the hypocritical raised heads of those who overwhelmed the magnificent bicocchiana rector with insults and then explained that Dostoevsky should be read and studied, yes, but as an antidote to a certain idea of ​​Russia and, ça va sans dire, to that villain. of Putin. The culture broth leaves no doubt about the quality of the nut thrown into the cauldron. And it should be noted that, with the exception of a few laudable niches of resistance, the slop is gobbled up voraciously and by unified networks both on the right and on the left in the political, cultural, social and religious fields.

The fruit grown on such mephitic soil revealed itself in a great deal of talk about Dostoevsky in which everyone got caught, especially those who have not read even a page and therefore do not fear ridicule or perjury in making him say as much as he pleases. collective intellectual: that “Dostoevsky is to be read as an antidote to Putin”. Not even Dosto ‘will leave me alone.

Now, I am not saying one of the great novels, because they are long and do not fit in a whatsapp message or in a tweet, but at least the shortest article of a writer’s Diary someone could also have scrolled through it: Bompiani, 1,402 pages divided into pieces even short, 40 euros. As I know, the Minister for Foreign Affairs of the current Italian government could be exercised there, which defined the President of the Russian Federation as “worse than an animal” without any significant reaction from the majority, opposition and “civil” society.

Among the pages of the Diary , Dostevskij’s adapters to the sirens of the world and of NATO would come across some surprises. They would discover, for example, how, about the “Slavic question” in vogue in Moscow and Petersburg cultural circles, Fëdor Michajlovič proclaimed the superiority of his land over Western Europe and argued that the latter, in some way, belongs to a common destiny for East and West to be decided on Russian soil.

There is not a single line of Western correctness in Dostoevsky’s work, given that the West has become what it is. But it is precisely in this key that its universality can be grasped, not to be confused with the cosmopolitanism so dear to those who do not go beyond Woody Allen and his crowds. God, orthodox religiosity, the relationship with earth and the world, sin, redemption are incomprehensible themes in the Dostoevsky spirit if they are related to the European waste imbued with rationalism and romanticism, two sides of a single coin.

The same consideration applies to the territorial claims, the history, the future of cities and peoples on which the great Russian talks for a long time and with illuminating depth even today. All arguments difficult to understand for a West born already old and prey to the poor nationalist appetites of which the Italian example is a case of school even in the culture that has rocked it.

More or less in those years Italy, in the bourgeois sentiment embodied by Manzoni, used to say “One of arms, of language, of altar, of memories, of blood and heart” and that was enough for her to aspire to a place in the sun. Meanwhile, in the Diary of him, Dostoevsky hoped for the annexation of Constantinople to Russia in the name of an unequivocal call to universality. In this regard, Armando Torno writes in the introduction that “the desire to annex Constantinople to Russia must be understood as a religious dream and not simply as a political experience. (…) Dostoevsky asks precisely Constantinople in the name of the universality of Russian Christianity ” .

An element so present in his spirit that it led him to respond in this way to those who asked him how his idea of ​​Russia entered into such a metaphysical vision of history:“As guide of Orthodoxy, as protector and conservator of it, a part belongs to it since the time of Ivan III and to indicate which he placed the double-headed Byzantine eagle above the ancient coat of arms of Russia. (…) This right over ancient Zargrad would be understandable and not offensive to the Slavs themselves, jealous of their independence, and even to the Greeks themselves. In this way, the true essence of the political relations that must inevitably arise between Russia and all Orthodox nations, whether Greek or Slavic, would be known. Russia is their protector and perhaps also their guide, but not their ruler; their mother and not their mistress ” .

A few citations are enough to understand how peregrine are the reprimands against Dostoevsky’s censors exhibited in favor of the chamber in the name of a Dostoevsky who does not exist. The paradox of such a grotesque reality lies in the fact that both censors and hairy censors of censors belong to the same world that the Russian writer describes in his novels as the fruit of a nihilism that is already full-blown even if recognized only by great spirits. . Like Fëdor Michajlovič, who had identified and overcome him in abandonment to Christ, or like Nietzsche, who had become his prey by taking him in an attempt to overcome him by entrusting himself to the new man.

No one expects the collective intellectual to study and annotate demons with the acribia and lacerating passion of the German philosopher, but at least throw an eye on them. He would find his creed in the pages where nihilists discuss life, death, God.

Verchovenski, for example, in the highly available edition Oscar Mondadori page 428:“People with superior skills cannot fail to be despotic and have always corrupted more than benefited; they are driven out or suppressed. Cicero’s tongue is cut out, Copernicus’s eyes are gouged out, Shakespeare is stoned (…). Slaves must be equal: without despotism there has still been neither freedom nor equality. (…) The thirst for education is an aristocratic thirst. As soon as family or love arises, there is already the desire for property. We will make the desire die: we will spread the hangover, the gossip, the denunciations; we will spread an unprecedented corruption, we will extinguish every genius in the swaddling clothes. All in the same denominator, perfect equality. (…) Full obedience, complete absence of personality,

The collective intellectual, hairy defender of Dostoevsky, will hardly be able to say that this is not the Western way of life to which he has devoted himself and in which he wallows so well since everything is allowed. He cannot say it, he who is the spiritual son of the theoretical Kirillov of metaphysical suicide as the ultimate expedient to replace God. Same work and same edition, page 116: “Whoever wants supreme freedom must have the courage to kill himself. (…) Beyond there is no freedom; here is everything and beyond there is nothing. Whoever has the courage to kill himself, that is God. Now everyone can make sure that there is no longer God and that there is nothing more ” .

To be the presentation of an initiative as important and exciting as the reflection on the figure of Dostoevsky, it seems to me that I have drawn it too long. But I think it is important to honestly explain what we will try to offer to those who follow us.

So, it’s called Kafè Dosto ‘ and now we have opened it. In reading and writing it is accessible to all friends of Ricognizioni: editors, collaborators and readers with a thought that has nothing collective. You enter without a green pass.

—
Italian Original post:

Un kafè con Dostoevskij. Contro il logorìo del nichilismo moderno – Ricognizioni

Si chiama Kafè Dosto’ ed è, come si usa dire oggi, uno spazio per parlare di Dostoevskij e magari anche conversare con lui, con la sua vita, il suo pensiero, le sue opere e la sua fede. L’intento fondamentale è quello di restituire a Fëdor Michajlovič la parola che di questi tempi non solo gli viene negata, ma, peggio ancora, mutata nel senso e nello spirito.

Qui a Ricognizioni, l’idea era nell’aria da tempo e ora non si concretizza banalmente nello stigmatizzare la censura dell’università Bicocca sul più grande romanziere che la Provvidenza abbia regalato a noi poveri mortali. Però bisogna riconoscere che la cronaca spesso manifesta oltre ogni più celata intenzione i segni dei tempi, oggi metafisicamente così inquietanti. Il caso è noto e non mette conto di riassumerlo, se non nel pensiero condizionato che ne sta al fondo. La colpa di Dosto’, come ormai tutti sanno, è quella di rappresentare un vertice della cultura russa ora che il mondo cosiddetto civile “una mattina / si è svegliato / ed ha trovato l’invasor”: russo, naturalmente, perché i tempi cambiano anche se gli idioti restano. Così l’ex opinione ex pubblica, dopo essere stata per due anni covidcentrica, ora si è improvvisamente scoperta ucrainocentrica.

Questo occidente, bislaccamente tramontato senza neppure rendersene conto, oggi è felicemente malato di russofobia e vede nella censura di Dostoevskij un buon esercizio di risveglio muscolare per l’intellettuale collettivo. Scambia per un segno di salute l’ennesima metastasi di un male più profondo e oscuro che il grande russo aveva diagnosticato più di un secolo mezzo fa e si chiama nichilismo. Ma non sono solo i censori di Dosto’ a soffrirne, ne patiscono anche molti, troppi censori dei censori, gelosi custodi di una libertà pelosa preposti a concedere la parola purché venga detta entro i reticolati della cultura dominante.

Mi interessa poco infierire sui poveri argomenti del magnifico rettore dell’ateneo milanese, o magnifica rettrice visto che in questi tempi barbari per una donna si usa dire così. Ho raggiunto un’età in cui si comprende che il grottesco non ha limiti se non negli abissi infernali dove nessuna parola ha più senso. E poi, guardare anche solo da lontano l’orrore dell’intelletto non è mai un esercizio salutare. Neppure ritengo interessante entrare nel dettaglio del corso su Dostoevskij prima negato, poi rinviato, poi concesso ma solo se accompagnato alla lettura di autori ucraini e poi portato dal titolare in altra sede. Siamo nell’ambito del trinariciutismo a suo tempo così ben stigmatizzato da Guareschi che nessuna pochezza di intelletto può veramente coglierci impreparati.

Mi preme di più, nel presentare Kafè Dosto’, accennare a un altro liquame intellettuale, proveniente in realtà dalla stessa cloaca, ma da un ramo più profondo, oscuro e pericoloso. Mi riferisco alle ipocrite alzate di testa di coloro che hanno subissato di improperi la magnifica rettrice bicocchiana e poi hanno spiegato che Dostoevskij va letto e studiato, sì, ma come antidoto a una certa idea della Russia e, ça va sans dire, a quel cattivo di Putin. Il brodo di cultura non lascia dubbi sulla qualità del dado gettato nel calderone. E va notato che, salvo alcune lodevoli nicchie di resistenza, la sbobba se la sono trangugiata voracemente e a reti unificate tanto a destra quanto a sinistra in campo politico, culturale, sociale e religioso.

Il frutto cresciuto su tale terreno mefitico si è palesato in un gran parlare di Dostoevskij in cui hanno messo becco tutti, soprattutto coloro che non ne hanno letto neppure una pagina e quindi non temono il ridicolo o lo spergiuro nel fargli dire quanto più aggrada all’intellettuale collettivo: che “Dostoevskij è da leggere come antidoto a Putin”. Neanche Dosto’ mi lasciano in pace.

Ora, non dico uno dei grandi romanzi, ché sono lunghi e non ci stanno in un messaggio di whatsapp o in un tweet, ma almeno il più breve articolo del Diario di uno scrittore qualcuno avrebbe anche potuto scorrerlo: Bompiani, 1.402 pagine suddivise in pezzi anche brevi, 40 euro. Che ne so, vi si potrebbe esercitare il ministro per gli Affari Esteri dell’attuale governo italiano che ha definito il Presidente della Federazione Russa “peggio di un animale” senza alcuna significativa reazione di maggioranza, opposizione e società “civile”.

Fra le pagine del Diario, gli adattatori di Dostevskij alle sirene del mondo e della Nato si imbatterebbero in qualche sorpresa. Scoprirebbero, per esempio, come, circa la “questione slava” in voga nei circoli culturali moscoviti e pietroburghesi, Fëdor Michajlovič proclamasse la superiorità della sua terra sull’Europa occidentale e sostenesse che quest’ultima, in qualche modo, appartiene a un destino comune per l’oriente e l’occidente da decidere sul suolo russo.

Non c’è un solo rigo di occidentalmente corretto nell’opera di Dostoevskij, stante che l’occidente è divenuto quel che è. Ma è proprio in tale chiave che se ne può cogliere l’universalità, da non confondere con il cosmopolitismo tanto caro a chi non va oltre Woody Allen e le sue turbe. Dio, la religiosità ortodossa, il rapporto con terra e il mondo, il peccato, la redenzione sono temi incomprensibili nello spirito dostoevskijano se si rapportano ai cascami europoidi intrisi di razionalismo e di romanticismo, due facce di una sola medaglia.

Stessa considerazione vale per le rivendicazioni territoriali, la storia, il futuro di città e popoli su cui il grande russo si intrattiene a lungo e con profondità illuminante anche sull’oggi. Tutte argomentazioni difficilmente comprensibili per un occidente nato già vecchio e preda dei poveri appetiti nazionalisti di cui l’esempio italiano è un caso di scuola fin nella cultura che lo ha cullato.

Più o meno in quegli anni l’Italia, nel sentimento borghese incarnato da Manzoni, si diceva “Una d’arme, di lingua, d’altare, di memorie, di sangue e di cor” e tanto le bastava per aspirare a un posto al sole. Intanto, nel Diario, Dostoevskij auspicava l’annessione di Costantinopoli alla Russia in nome di una inequivocabile chiamata all’universalità. A questo proposito scrive Armando Torno nell’introduzione che “il desiderio di annettere Costantinopoli alla Russia dobbiamo intenderlo come un sogno religioso e non semplicemente come un’esperienza politica. (…) Dostoevskij chiede appunto Costantinopoli in nome dell’universalità del cristianesimo russo”.

Elemento tanto presente al suo spirito da portarlo a rispondere così a chi gli chiedeva come entrasse la sua idea di Russia in una tale visione metafisica della storia: “Come guida dell’Ortodossia, come protettrice e conservatrice di essa, una parte le spetta già dai tempi di Ivan III e per indicare la quale questi mise l’aquila bizantina a due teste al di sopra dell’antico stemma della Russia. (…) Questo diritto sull’antica Zargrad sarebbe comprensibile e non offensivo per gli stessi slavi, gelosi della loro indipendenza, e perfino per gli stessi greci. In questo modo si darebbe a conoscere la vera essenza dei rapporti politici che debbono immancabilmente sorgere tra la Russia e tutte le nazioni ortodosse, greche o slave che siano. La Russia è la loro protettrice e forse anche la loro guida, non però la loro dominatrice; la loro madre e non la loro padrona”.

Bastano poche citazioni per capire quanto siano peregrine le reprimende ai censori di Dostoevskij esibite in favore di camera in nome di un Dostoevskij che non esiste. Il paradosso di una realtà così grottesca sta nel fatto che gli uni e gli altri, censori e pelosi censori dei censori, appartengono allo stesso mondo che lo scrittore russo descrive nei suoi romanzi come frutto di un nichilismo già conclamato anche se riconosciuto soltanto dai grandi spiriti. Come Fëdor Michajlovič, che lo aveva individuato e vinto nell’abbandono a Cristo, o come Nietzsche, che ne era divenuto preda assumendolo nel tentativo di superarlo affidandosi all’uomo nuovo.

Nessuno pretende che l’intellettuale collettivo studi e annoti I demoni con l’acribìa e la lacerante passione del filosofo tedesco, ma che almeno ci buttasse un occhio. Troverebbe il suo credo nelle pagine in cui i nichilisti discettano sulla vita, sulla morte, su Dio.

Verchovenski, per esempio, nella reperibilissima edizione Oscar Mondadori pagina 428: “Le persone con doti superiori non possono non essere dispotiche e hanno sempre corrotto più che giovato; esse vengono scacciate o soppresse. A Cicerone si taglia la lingua, a Copernico si cavano gli occhi, Shakespeare viene lapidato (…). Gli schiavi devono essere eguali: senza dispotismo non c’è ancora stata né libertà né eguaglianza. (…) La sete di istruzione è una sete aristocratica. Non appena sorge la famiglia o l’amore, ecco già anche il desiderio della proprietà. Noi faremo morire il desiderio: diffonderemo le sbornie, i pettegolezzi, le denunce; spargeremo una corruzione inaudita, spegneremo ogni genio nelle fasce. Tutto allo stesso denominatore, l’eguaglianza perfetta. (…) Piena obbedienza, completa assenza di personalità, ma una volta ogni trent’anni (…) si scatena anche una convulsione e tutti cominceranno a un tratto a divorarsi l’un l’altro, però fino a un certo punto, unicamente per evitare la noia”.

Difficilmente l’intellettuale collettivo, peloso difensore di Dostoevskij, potrà dire che questo non sia l’occidental way of life a cui si è votato e in cui sguazza così bene poiché tutto è permesso. Non può dirlo, lui che è figlio spirituale del Kirillov teorico del suicidio metafisico come espediente ultimo per sostituirsi a Dio. Medesima opera e medesima edizione, pagina 116: “Chiunque voglia la libertà suprema deve avere il coraggio di uccidersi. (…) Più in là non c’è libertà; qui è tutto e più in là non c’è nulla. Chi ha il coraggio di uccidersi, quello è Dio. Ora ognuno può fare che non ci sia più Dio e che non ci sia più nulla”.

Per essere la presentazione di un’iniziativa pur importante e appassionante come la riflessione sulla figura di Dostoevskij mi pare di averla tirata anche troppo in lungo. Ma ritengo importante spiegare onestamente cosa cercheremo di offrire a chi ci segue.

Dunque, si chiama Kafè Dosto’ e ora l’abbiamo aperto. In lettura e scrittura è accessibile a tutti gli amici di Ricognizioni: redattori, collaboratori e lettori dotati di un pensiero che nulla abbia di collettivo. Si entra senza green pass

Toni, with a little heart over the I, just sanctioned China for genocide of the Uighurs. Dumb mofo. From a commenter on Reminiscence of the Past page:

Genius US diplomacy at work again. US: China help us beat your friend now so we can focus on beating you later. China: No. US: Say a mean thing about them though. China: No. US: Well you better say a mean thing or else we’re gonna stomp our feet! China: I’m sorry, did you say something? US: You’re a meanie! We’re going make it so you can’t come and visit our third world country! That will show you meanies!

UK Prepares to seize Gazprom’s assets. No Russian response yet? Are they just going to sit back and watch as their national wealth is plundered. $300 Billion in reserves has already been stolen.

Hypersonic weapons are for this and upcoming wars against the EoL what “Stalin organs” (Katyusha) were in WWII against the German nazi scum, without the psychological warfare component, the howling sounds. The Germans better pay attention, their reading of the message sent by Russia is correct. Hopefully they will get it this time.

https://ria.ru/20220322/predosterezhenie-1779364132.html

In Germany, the use of “Dagger” in Ukraine was considered a warning for NATO

German expert Hegman called the use of “Dagger” in Ukraine a warning for NATO

MOSCOW, 22 Mar-RIA Novosti. Hypersonic weapons-the Dagger missile-first used by Russia in a special military operation in Ukraine pose an unsolvable problem for the West. This opinion was expressed in an article for the German newspaper Die Welt by columnist Gerhard Hegman.

Earlier, the official representative of the Russian Ministry of DefenseIgor Konashenkov said that the hypersonic missile “Dagger” inIn the Ivano-Frankivsk region, the storage of combat units for the Ukrainian Tochka-U tactical missile systems was destroyed, as well as large fuel depots inMykolaiv region.

Military experts, the article says, are considering the use ofUsing “Dagger” as a warning from the Russian PresidentVladimir Putin’s address to NATO. The North Atlantic Bloc, and especially its European members, are aware of the effectiveness of hypersonic weapons, against which they do not have effective systems to repel them.

The Dagger can travel at ten times the speed of sound. In this regard, the reaction time after its identification is extremely short. Therefore, the missile is considered almost invulnerable to Western air defense systems, Hegman summarizes….
————————————-

Lone Wolf

Andrei, is Russia openly using theemobaric weapons? It does look like they are being used. What’s the policy?

https://twitter.com/RWApodcast/status/1506016231794561030

I have often wondered why any serious investors would invest in markets:

1. Of a nation that murders and genocides the defenseless such as women and children – by the millions

2. And their inhumane wars are endless

3. That steals the resources of defenceless nations by bribery and blackmail

4. That lies about everything…

5. Has its own citizens living on the streets in feces and urine as adjudicated by its Courts.

6. Pays little attention to the health needs of its veterans that have returned from its wars

7. Imposes illegal mandates on its people to take injections of substances of questionable content but nevertheless – admitting the uselessness of vaccine intent and includes useless masks.

8 Intent of savaging early children with variations to their sexuality – by opinion – or is its a fee per child?

9. Imposition of jabs on early children (defenseless) with toxic vaccines

10 Has its ‘leadership’ in the hands of a bigger idiot that Baby Bush while being corruption as his God link to a drug satiated representative son.

11. Has its FedRes bias all monies to the 0.001% Banker elite while screwing its citizens.

12. Let’s not forget The State Department which actively is engaged in developing more wars with other defenseless nations like Libya – sodomizing their leaders using marine knives.

13. And the genocide of Palestinians – now that is just sick

I could go on, however… but I don’t call any of this as ‘civilization’.

… also doesn’t allow me to have any faith in this junkies paradise.