By Batiushka for The Saker Blog
From Kaliningrad on the Baltic to Odessa on the Black Sea an iron curtain has descended across the continent. Behind that line lie all the capitals of Western, Central and Eastern Europe, all these famous cities and the populations around them lie in what I must call the American sphere, and all are subject, in one form or another, not only to American influence but to a very high and in some cases increasing measure of control from the Great Satan in Washington, cutting off that dark and tiny Western world from the teeming billions of toiling humanity, in China, India, Vietnam, Indonesia, Iran, indeed all the Muslim World, all Africa and all Latin America. It is they who are now looking with hope to Russia, to her light to free the world, to her wheat to feed the world, and to her oil to warm the world.
The Fulton Speech II
‘And I heard a voice in the midst of the beasts saying, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine’.
The Apocalypse 6:6
Introduction: 6 June 1945
There is a type of history known as ‘What if History’. Its correct name is ‘Suppositional History’. Quite simply, it deals with logical but parallel universes of the imagination and asks, ‘What if/suppose X had not happened, and Y had happened instead, what would Z be like today? One jump of the imagination and we can arrive in a very logical, quite plausible, yet actually non-existent, world. One of these what-if questions is: What would have happened if the ‘Anglo-Saxons’ (British, Americans and Canadians) had not invaded Normandy on 6 June 1944 or else had been repelled? The answer we come to is that the Red Army would not have stopped in Berlin in May 1945. It would have gone on, leaving Berlin and the suicide of Hitler far behind them, and almost unopposed, it would have gone on to the very coasts of Western Europe.
Then the phrase ‘The Normandy Landings’ would have had a very different meaning. 6 June 1945 would have looked very different from 6 June 1944. Ironically, the fact that D-Day happened means that Western Europe was never liberated from the Nazi mentality (1). In other words it was never freed from that bizarre ideology and mentality of Western Supremacism, which declares that ‘The West is Best’. In 2022 we are still paying the price for this failure to finish World War II. This is why it is absurd to talk of World War III; World War II has not finished yet (2). Yet, perhaps some of us will one day see Russian troops liberating Europe, not only as far as Paris as in 1814, but as far as Normandy and even beyond, to the islands across the sea, to what the ancients called ‘Ultima Thule’.
Operation Z
Today’s conflict in the Ukraine would have been over by now, if the West had not constantly escalated it, continually creating new provocations and refusing to allow their puppet regime in Kiev to surrender. As a result, the Russian Federation Forces and Allies are having to destroy not only Kiev Army military equipment but also swathes of NATO equipment, brought in from Western Europe and ultimately even from the USA. Once that equipment, much of it obsolete, has been used up, destroyed by Russian missiles, NATO will be on the run. So what could happen then? Some will object, but the Russian Federation only wanted to liberate the Donbass? Was it then lying? Did it want to occupy all the Ukraine after all or even go further?
No, it was not lying, but because of the host of Western-inspired provocations, such as cutting off water and power to the Crimea, the Federation is being obliged to occupy not only the Russian-speaking East, but also the Russian-speaking South of the Ukraine. Moreover, since the North and the West of the Ukraine are being sent new and threatening weapons (a lot had already been supplied in the years and months before the Special Operation, in preparation for the Ukrainian campaign to genocide the Donbass and invade the Crimea in early March 2022), they too will have to be dealt with in some way or other. Since so many millions of anti-Russian Ukrainians have left the North and the West of the Ukraine for the West, the Russian task may no longer be so difficult. Demilitarisation means what it says – destroying everything that NATO sends, however that plays out.
The latest news is that the idiotic and ignorant British Foreign Secretary, Liz Truss, now wants to NATO-ise Moldova. So that too will have to be cleared. Since the total strength of the Moldovan Army, many of whom are pro-Russian anyway, is 5,000, it should not be difficult. But why stop there? If the Ukraine and Moldova can be cleared by the end of 2022, which is possible, there comes 2023. As we have mentioned previously, we have the concept of Operation Z+. What does that mean? It means the demilitarisation and denazification of the whole world, beginning with the small but densely-populated European Peninsula.
This means not only liberating the peoples of the present EU from crushing ‘defence’ (= offence) costs, which have so impoverished its peoples for so long. Above all it means internal liberation, ridding the peoples of Europe of the millennial parasite of the Nazi ideology and mentality, with which they have been so infected by their elite that it has become an unconscious but integral part of Western culture. This is so much so that they do not even realise that they are Nazis and would be shocked by the mere suggestion. Yet, it is precisely this disease of Western Supremacism that has deformed, twisted, brainwashed, manipulated and deluded the Western world for so long.
Of course, such a highly ambitious project cannot happen just like that. We are talking about slow, progressive and generational change, and by no means necessarily by military means. Here below, as an example, is a 44-year programme. This is not at all realistic in its precision (timetables never work – reality takes over), but it does set a sort of guideline or target to move towards. And all is possible, once the Ukraine has been delivered from the bonds of Satan. The bonds of Satan, after all, are the meaning of the flying of the Ukrainian flag in the Collective West and its use, for instance, on Twitter and Facebook accounts. Let us explain:
Those who have little concept of where the Ukraine is, or the fact that this artificial hotchpotch of an ‘independent’ country (in fact, a US colony) has only existed for some thirty years and that it has oppressed and exiled millions of people and murdered tens of thousands in the name of its Nazi ideology, do know one thing: Flying a Ukrainian flag means displaying their own self-interest – the Ukrainian flag represents the flag of their personal, though usually quite unconscious, Nazi ideology of Western Supremacism (3). Once the Ukraine has been cleansed by Operation Z, somewhere they know that they will be cleansed next. They fear that cleansing. The coming of reality will terrify the deluded with the frightening words: after Z comes Z+.
Operation Z+
1. 2022: The Liberation of the ‘Ukraine’ and Moldova
Nobody knows when the demilitarisation of what will remain of the old Ukraine will be complete. The old Ukraine could collapse in weeks, with a military coup against the puppet-traitor Zelensky, or it could take a year or even more. We make no forecasts. At the moment NATO is escalating the conflict even further, but from the very outset this always was a proxy war between Washington and Moscow. In any case, it seems as if a military government will be required for the future Ukraine (population 15 million?) in its new borders. Ukrainian civilian governments, led by Non-Ukrainian oligarchs and their puppets, have all been utterly corrupt, to the benefit and the intention of the West.
Nobody knows what will happen in the far west of the Ukraine. Will the three provinces of Volyn, Lviv and Ivano-Frankivsk return to Poland? Or perhaps more than three will leave? Will so-called ‘Transcarpathia’ (a nonsensical name – it is Kiev that is across the Carpathians), or to call it by its proper names, Carpatho-Russia/Subcarpathian Rus/Ruthenia, return to Hungary or Slovakia, or will it become part of the Russian Federation? Moldova, which has nearly half of its four million population abroad, in exile, is utterly corrupt, making it the poorest country in Europe and ensuring that mass emigration. This problem too will surely have to be dealt with.
2. 2023-2026: The Liberation of the Baltic States
Physically, the tiny and unviable Baltic States, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, could be conquered and demilitarised swiftly. However, their ‘refascistisation’ under NATO/Nazi US-colonial governments, their deindustrialisation (forcing some 40% of the population to emigrate) and the sadistic oppression of their Russian minorities are all problems that will have to be dealt with. These countries will take time to denazify, even though their population is today barely four million.
3. 2027-2030: The Liberation of the Eastern Balkans
Once the utterly corrupt, US-installed elites of Romania and Bulgaria have been dealt with and NATO terrorist equipment removed, these countries can return to normality.
4. 2031-2034: The Liberation of the Western Balkans
The problems of ex-Yugoslavia and Albania were not only found to be insoluble by the West, the West made them far worse. There must be solutions for maltreated Serbia and Bosnia. Croat and Muslim parts of Bosnia-Herzegovina could be exchanged with Croatia for East Slavonia, which must be returned to Serbia. Some population exchanges would be necessary. Serbia and Montenegro will reunite, once the pro-US traitors of the elite have been removed. Slovenia presents no problem as it is homogeneous. North Macedonia is now an independent country.
However, there remains the problem of Kosovo, divided between Serbians and Albanians. Only great investment and prosperity in the huge tourist potential of Albania, at present the European capital of car-thieves, gun-runners and drug-smugglers, could draw back Albanians from Kosovo to their own country and also attract the Albanian minorities from Montenegro and North Macedonia to a newly prosperous ancestral homeland, so returning those lands to Slavs and making them homogenous again. Goodbye, Camp Bondsteel.
5. 2035-2038: The Liberation of Austro-Hungary
We believe that Hungary would be liberated very quickly, Austria would take longer, but there are some promising signs there. The EU is not popular in either.
6. 2039-2042: The Liberation of the Hellenes
Greece could be liberated relatively easily: Nazism has never dominated there, except among its US-colonial politicians. Cyprus, grabbed by Imperialist Britain in 1878 and let out to it like a piece of real estate, is more complex. The British – in fact – American base there would have to be removed. Although Greek-Cypriots and Turkish-Cypriots get on well, there is the problem of the US and British-sponsored Turkish invasion of North Cyprus in 1974 and Turkish settlers from the mainland now there. Here Turkey must receive compensation elsewhere, so that Cyprus can be restored.
7. 2043-2046: The Liberation of the West Slavs
Slovakia might be liberated quite easily, but not so much the Germanised Czech Lands or Poland. Nazi operations like Akcja Visla in 1947, when the south-eastern Lemko Rusin minority were terrorised by Fascist Polish troops and forcibly removed from the Beskids show just how vicious Poland can be. Few now recall that Poland had a Fascist government before 1939 and took part in dismembering Czechoslovakia together with Hitler. Yet, it is a fact. Progress here could be slow, even in the 2040s.
8. 2047-2050: The Liberation of the German Lands
This means denazifying (and de-Americanising) the German Lands, in other words, restoring those lands at last to the German Peoples, den deutschen Volken. We do not see Germany remaining as a single nation. It would be better if it returned to being four, five or more different countries, such as Bavaria, Saxony, Hannover, Brandenburg and Westphalia.
9. 2051-2054: The Liberation of the Border German Peoples
By Border German Peoples, we mean the most latinised Germanic peoples, where French or Italian is sometimes also spoken, that is, those in Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and the artificial, Ukrainian-like (British-invented) country of Belgium, which is in fact part of the Southern Netherlands and, to a smaller extent, part of Northern France. Brussels, its overgrown village of a capital with a large immigrant population, may collapse very quickly once it has been cleansed of the cancerous EU and NATO headquarters.
10. 2055-2058: The Liberation of the Western Latin Peoples
The Western Latin peoples (the Eastern Latin peoples are the Romanians and the Moldovans), are those of France, Corsica, Italy, San Marino, Andorra, Spain, Catalonia, Portugal and their Non-Latin minorities, the Bretons and the Basques. With elites removed, here the ordinary people can at last come to the fore.
11. 2059-2062: The Liberation of the Nordic Peoples
Here we mean the Scandinavian and Nordic countries – Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Iceland. All have very small populations, but all too often have the hypocritical woke mentality of the Nazis. We only have to look at their attitude during the Second World War. Finland fought with the Nazis, Denmark and Norway hardly resisted and ‘neutral’ Sweden willingly supplied essential raw materials to the Reich.
12. 2063-2066: The Liberation of the Isles
This might be the most problematic of all. However, Ireland, soon to be reunited, would surely welcome full liberation, Republican Scotland too, even Wales: only a few are affected there in these Celtic lands of low population. But there is still England, which has to be freed from alien ‘Britain’ and so restored. That which has poisoned England and English life for nearly a millennium, the British Establishment, centred in the Norman-founded City of London (the Old English Capital was Winchester) and spreading its tentacles throughout the country, must be removed.
Consisting of parasitic politicians, with its current Bully Bunter English public schoolboy leader Johnson, the Armed Forces, the Secret Police (politely called MI5), aristocrats, bankers and industrialists, their propaganda mouthpiece, the BBC, condescendingly utilised to control the plebs with the other oligarchic media, as well as other government arms, the Establishment does not represent England, only Britain. Let the oppressed provinces of England rise and reject the gangrene of the tentacular Metropolitan elite. Instead of a Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, imported in order to avoid having a Catholic on the throne, let a Non-French/Welsh/ Scottish/Dutch/German but English monarch at last come to the throne after a thousand years and a trillion tears. Only so can the British abscess be lanced and England healed from its millennial brain and soul-fever.
Conclusion
Here then is a suggestion for raising the European iron curtain, by denazifying, deNATOfying, deEUing and so liberating the European Peninsula of North-Western Eurasia. Some will say that, even spread over 44 years, this project is hopelessly optimistic, it is even impossible; others will say that it is pessimistic, that all could happen within a few years, for Western Europe is a house of cards. We do not know who is right. Is there even a Russian appetite for this? Not without popular support on the ground. Without popular support, no invader can win – even the USA must know this from its defeats in Vietnam and Afghanistan. However, in any case, if the West continues to escalate the conflict in the Ukraine, inevitably it will have to pay for the consequences of its great foolishness. You should not play American roulette (4), especially when you live in a house of cards.
Yet, if multipolar Afro-Eurasia is to forge ahead at full speed, Europe must be liberated from its Western Supremacist/Nazi ideology. And the New Worlds will also have to sort themselves out, though with help. Russia can help in Latin America, China in Oceania. As for North America, the USA will yet collapse into its component parts, with the southern States returning to Mexico, New England going to Canada, other parts becoming independent Confederations, Alaska returning to the Russian Federation, thus restoring the Federation as a tricontinental nation, which is its destiny. Perhaps the denazified British Isles and Ireland could play a useful role in the States that will remain? Of course, we know nothing of how far or fast such an ambitious vision could progress. But frankly, if only 10% of any of the above were achieved, that would be huge and miraculous progress.
Notes:
1. See our article on this site: ‘What Does Nazism Mean?’ (29th March 2022)
2. Many would say that World War II was itself merely the continuation of World War I. The French Marshal Foch considered that the Treaty of Versailles which officially ended the War would lead to a new War. As it was being signed in June 1919, he said: ‘This is not peace. It is an armistice for 20 years’. His forecast was exact to the very year.
3. See our article on this site ‘What Sort of People Fly a Ukrainian Flag?’ (3rd May 2022)
4. This is the correct name for so-called ‘Russian roulette’. It never existed in Russia, but was invented by a US writer for a work of fiction in 1937. Presumably he gave it the Russian name as it sounded ‘exotic’ to him. Another crazy and racist Russophobic invention that only gun-obsessed cowboys with their cult of violence could think up.
The population bomb theory was destroyed very soon after its foundation. UN is now showing highest numbers of population in 2100. Other researchers disagree.
By 2100 over 80s will outnumber under 5s around the world by two to one. As fertility falls and life expectancy increases worldwide, the number of children under 5 years old is forecasted to decline by 41% from 681 million in 2017 to 401 million in 2100, whilst the number of individuals older than 80 years is projected to increase six fold, from 141 million to 866 million.
The global fertility rate is predicted to steadily decline, but the changes are not the same in every country.
Plenty of signs have pointed to there being a population plateau, but recent research from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), published in The Lancet, suggests that the number of people on this planet may actually start to shrink well before the year 2100.
Here’s a closer look at these complex projections.
UN vs. IHME Population Estimates
According to the UN, the world population is set to steadily rise over the years:
2030: 8.5 billion
2050: 9.7 billion
2100: 10.9 billion
In contrast, IHME paints a different picture. It projects the population to actually peak at 9.7 billion in 2064. Following this trajectory, there could be 8.8 billion people in 2100, approximately 2 billion fewer than previously thought.
Various demographic factors are behind these differences—higher life expectancies, migration rates, and lower fertility rates. For this last factor, independent drivers including contraceptive access and higher educational attainment were also considered.
A shifting age structure is also a key aspect of this transition. By 2100, over a quarter of the world or nearly 2.37 billion will be aged 65 years and above.
The Most Populous Countries in 2100
Amid all these demographic sea changes, which countries will come out on top?
Despite an overall decline in numbers to 1.09 billion people in 2100, India moves up from second to first place on the population leaderboard. China’s population will shrink heavily to just 732 million in 2100.
Led by Nigeria, Sub-Saharan Africa is the only region that will continue to see growth by century’s end. In fact, four of the top 10 countries in the world in terms of population count will be located in Sub-Saharan Africa.
It’s useful to understand that governments in low birth rate countries have had almost impossible task increasing population with higher birth rates. It just doesn’t work. More and more women have no children at all. They (may) like sex, but no kids. In future its only immigration which can prevent population decreased in non-African countries.
So it’s likely reality that once again it’s Africans who are repopulating the rest of the world. Talking about Russia “liberation world” is pure fantasy. Once Russian Empire had around 10% of world population. Now 1,5% and in future much less than 1%. It has become almost empty house waiting its own Africans/Muslims coming.
Salaam,Frank,do not put too much into these projection models.Note how accurate,these projection modelings were for the pandemic!
Two informative posts on Azov ,Natsiks,and Ukraine:
Sladkov will tell you all about Azov: WE ARE FIGHTING AGAINST NEO-NAZISM. BUT WHAT IS IT IN THE UKRAINIAN PERFORMANCE? MANY IN RUSSIA DON’T EVEN IMAGINE WHAT A STRONG ENEMY IS OPPOSING TO US.
To begin with, it is important to understand what Azov is? A common misconception is that this is a regiment. And this is absolutely wrong, “Azov” is not a military formation at all, but rather a paramilitary political movement.
Azov is led by the SNA, a social-nationalist assembly (political organization). Its names have changed, but the essence remains the same – it is a Kharkov neo-Nazi organization, around which the entire current Azov movement was formed. It is important to clearly understand that they are not Ukrainian nationalists, but neo-Nazis, supporters of white supremacy. This is an analogue of the NSDAP (the very Nazis of Nazi Germany 1920-45).
A rank below the SNA in “Azov” is a mass political movement – the “national corps”. Against the background of the failure of the old Ukrainian nationalists, the NK grew, successfully crushing the smaller neo-Nazi organizations. This is not a bureaucratic imitation of politics, this is a real, ideological, young and active movement of Ukrainian neo-Nazis.
The Ukrainian analogue of the German SA (fascist assault detachments in Germany, until 1945) are the “National squads”, which in modern Ukraine could become the only mass organization of “street politics”. They were able to unite the Ukrainian skinheads, and then successfully absorb the youth wing of the decaying Svoboda Tyagnibok (Ukrainian nationalist and politician). As a result, the “National squads” of “Azov” expanded their influence throughout Ukraine, moreover, to the regions where classical Ukrainian nationalists were traditionally strong, and also influence their eastern regions.
“Azov” has its own network of children’s camps “Azovets”, there are also teenage organizations, an analogue of the Hitler Youth. Also, “Azov” successfully ousted the nationalist boy scouts SIC, SPOK, even Plast (12,000 young people).
Beneath this whole system are simple skinheads, youth street gangs, a lot of sports organizations and clubs, veterans and other communities. A huge “night” world is also under “Azov”, where members of the organization became leaders of the criminal world. Azov also has its own business, its own press, literature, music… There are cities that they rule behind the scenes, or even almost openly, one of them was Mariupol, the other Kharkov. And now you can move on to the military detachments of “Azov”. First of all, this is the regiment of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine “Azov” – an analogue of the SS (the main force of the Nazis in Germany 1920-45). The Azov Regiment conducts its own selection of candidates, its own training schools, its own ranks and complete autonomy. This is the elite of the organization, and at the same time the elite of the Ukrainian security forces, which is controlled by the White Leader, not the headquarters.
But that’s not all. Members of organizations serve not only in the elite regiment, but in all power structures of Ukraine. From the first day of the war, “Azov” began to form new detachments, only in Kharkov they created at least two brigades of territorial defense. And there are Kyiv brigades, and a detachment of the MTR, and many others. And this is not only the brigade-regiment level, there are also battalions and local Azov detachments.
In Mariupol, we destroyed the elite – the “Azov” SS. But this is far from the end, the organization is alive, popular in Ukraine and in the world, more than ever, it has cleared itself of a negative image in the West (well, it is at war with the LDNR and Russia), from persecution by the American FBI and has already made up for losses in people and living force.
And:
Sladkov: UKRAINIAN PRISONERS WHICH I SAW THOUSANDS – THEY ARE KILLERS OF PEOPLE, AND THIS IS THE PROBLEM.
When they come out with their hands up, they behave quietly, modestly, barely audibly answering questions.
They deny the war, and do not like to say that they are in the Donbass for the third time, or even the fifth…
But they are shooting at civilians. There are no others who do not surrender. We feel sorry for them, we even believe that they are here, even if for the fifth time, but by accident. And they are common killers.
After all, this is their theme – “Moskalyaku on Gilyaku.” It’s just that they become different when they raise their hands up. But the time will come when they will be free, we will not kill them. They will come out and be the same. And therein lies the problem.
We must create a system that grinds such people into flour even when they are free, if they dare only think about the past. They must be thrown from the past into sweat. https://t.me/Sladkov_plus/5583
I find posts like this throughout the Russian social media as well as Telegram. An answer must soon be forthcoming before the question raises to a angry shout throughout Russia:
And once again I cannot understand why, in response to the shelling of Donetsk schools and kindergartens, Kyiv buildings cannot be wiped off the face of the earth, in which meetings with British pederasts and meetings of the Nazi Rada are pompously held in WAR time. At least on the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the Headquarters of the Ground Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the Intelligence Directorate, it would be necessary to hit, and back in February. Or are we embarrassed to disrupt the control of the Ukronazi troops? https://t.me/SergeyKolyasnikov/37695
What a ridiculous article. So weaaak…
“We are good and the others are Nazis”… it reminds me of GW Bush saying, if you’re not with us you’re our enemies. Nuance, critical analysis, you’ve heard of that.?
I’m French and of Finn descent. We fought Stalin’s Red Army to keep our ancestors’ lands. Not because we were nazis.
Stalin and his clique was a disasterfor many people in Ussr. And he was not nazi, though?
Etc etc…
The world is not binary. I don’t hate Russians nor Ukrainians. Stop the war please
Heavenly Jerusalem on the basis of five southern regions of Ukraine
Heavenly Jerusalem (also New Jerusalem, Israel 2.0, New Israel) is a project whose goal is the formation of a Jewish state within Ukraine on the territories of its five southern regions: Odessa , Dnipropetrovsk , Zaporozhye , Kherson and Mykolaiv .
The project is long-term, its terms are determined by the Board of Benefactors, the time is described until 2049 and even after 2060.
Project description
According to I. Berkut , the author of the idea and the executive director of the project [2] [3] [4] : the next five years is destruction and fragmentation after 19, and the next five years, after 2024, is reformatting. 2029 is the first step for NI”
Thus, by the end of 2029, about 5 million Jews are expected to arrive in the New Motherland for the construction of New Jerusalem [5] .
Prime Minister of Israel B. Netanyahu has already discussed the organization of the resettlement and settlement of Jews, as well as possible economic and political assistance in the implementation of the project, with the current Prime Minister of Ukraine V. Groisman , Prime Minister of the Russian Federation D. A. Medvedev , senior adviser to US President Donald Trump and a member of the influential Jewish organization Chabad Lubavitch , Jared Kushner .
The project receives support from well – known public figures , political scientists and analysts [ 6 ] : V. Pozner , Ya .
It is noteworthy that despite its scale of the project, it is not covered either in the world or even in the local Ukrainian press (meaning the central media channels), with very rare exceptions.
Almost all information about the project implementation comes from its executive director Igor Berkut . Video interviews of I. Berkut, covering the progress of the project, are posted on the YouTube channel “Rassvet”.
The official announcement of the New Jerusalem project is planned to be made after the adoption of the law on the decentralization of Ukraine in 2021-2022. In July 2019, Switzerland allocated 25 million euros, including for the decentralization of Ukraine [8] [n1].
The New Jerusalem project started in early 2017 with the landing in the port of Odessa of the first group of immigrants from Israel, headed by I. Berkut [2, 19:40]. This group of 183 Jewish pioneers arrived in Ukraine from Haifa ( Israel ) to lay the first stone in the foundation of Heavenly Jerusalem on the fertile land of southern Ukraine.
The management of the New Jerusalem will be entrusted to the “Council of Benevolent” consisting of 12 leaders [9] :
A native of Kiev , Golda Meir, 5th Prime Minister of the State of Israel, was declared Honorary Eternal Head of the Council;
B. Netanyahuwill become the Chairman-Prime Minister, after the completion of the powers of the Prime Minister in the State of Israel ;
The former head of the US Federal Reserve, Ben Bernanke, will manage the finances ;
Defense issues will be in charge of the current Minister of Defense of Israel, a native of Chisinau, Avigdor Lieberman;
The secret services will be headed by Yakov Kedmi, former head of the NativBureau for Relations with Jews of the USSR and Eastern Europe, who was born in Moscow ;
Political scientist and publicist Avigdor Eskin, who was born in Moscow, will be in charge of foreign affairs ;
Internal affairs will be entrusted to the former Minister of Internal Affairs of the State of Israel, Soviet dissident Natan Sharansky;
The media will be headed by the famous Russian TV presenter Vladimir Solovyov;
Questions of justice will be decided by a native of the Crimea, lawyer Tatyana Montyan;
The speaker of the Council will be the former president of the Russian Jewish Congress Evgeny Satanovsky;
The chief rabbi is supposed to appoint an ethnic AshkenaziKhazar version of the appearance of this branch of the tree of Israel;
Hidden Apostle
It is planned to create two capitals in New Jerusalem [10] : the first, political and business capital, will be located in today’s city of Dnepropetrovsk and will be called consonant with the New Jerusalem project, the second, cultural, will be located in Odessa and will be called “Adessa”.
Reforms in Ukraine
The New Jerusalem project is consulted by the Polish Minister of Finance Leszek Balcerowicz [11] [12] , who, together with I. Berkut and other participants, is the author of economic reforms in Ukraine. According to the authors of the reforms, the depopulation of the population should become the basis for the well-being of the citizens of the future Ukraine: “The main principle of the reform is that the smaller the population, the higher the GDP per capita. Therefore, the main way of reform is a steady gradual decrease in the population of the country,” admits I. Berkut [13] [14] .
In accordance with these reforms, in 2017 the Minister of Social Affairs politician A. Reva said [15] [16] : “There are not only too many Ukrainians, but they still eat a lot.” V. Groysman, in turn, found courage and for the first time in the history of Ukraine said [17] [18] : “Ukrainians study too much.” I (I. Berkut) and V. Groysman, we both understand that “for a Ukrainian child, this should be” day of kavun”, “day of tsibuli”, “day of embroidery”; for a Jewish child, this should be “day of physics”, ” chemistry day”, “programming day”
Financing
As of the end of 2016, I. Berkut cites the following sources of project financing within the framework of economic reforms in Ukraine [19] : $250,000 from one of the IMF tranches ($1 billion), $250,000 from the F4 fund (Ukrainian Economy Modernization Fund, Switzerland , “Friedman, Feldman, Fishman and Firtash”), we hope to receive another $ 450,000 from the George Soros Foundation .
In another video [20] , the executive director of the project speaks as follows: The foundation (financial) is laid by divine providence. Today, 2-3 billionaires leave for the other world every day. If they leave all the inheritance to their relatives, it will harm them. They can donate money to the project. Assistance is also expected from the billionaires of Kazakhstan, Russia and many other countries. This will be help from Russia, Germany, the European Central Bank, the Bank of England, the House of Rothschild , the USA, from hundreds of family funds, from Hollywood , from Apple , Facebook , Google .
In July 2019, Ukraine received funding from Switzerland (€25 million), the EU (€137 + 29.5 million) and technical assistance from the US ($695 million) [21] . We are talking about supporting public administration reforms and qualitative changes in the provision of services, as well as decentralization.
re: under #6, the liberation of the Hellenes, “Here Turkey must receive compensation elsewhere, so that Cyprus can be restored.”
It crossed my mind that a fitting compensation would be the City of London.
Compensation ought to be enticing to Turkey, while coming from the fold of a party who create the Cyprus problem in the first place.
If the Puritans and Puritanism had been extirpated, in England, by the Crown, the History of Northwestern, Central and Eastern Europe, and North America, would have been different. Certainly, it would resemble the pre 1789 world, without the Anglo fomented French Revolution.
Another thing to consider. What if the Hanseatic League hadn’t opened a branch in London, and brought the printing press, and better ploughs to England? Or certain other technical advances, as well? Like windmills.
Without the Puritan itch to “reform” the World, the Anglosphere would have not been hyper-agressive, like it was, and still is, to a certain extent.
Russia has just annonced ”anyone who shows disrespect for islam will be arrested”. This is music in my ears as a muslim.
Russia invited 2 billion people on its side to fight satan.
I am less than impressed by the idea that Russia is remotely interested in anything more than securing the “near abroad”, which would be a crippling blow to NATO anyway. Even to restore this “near abroad”, the current government will have to be compelled by popular pressure. The Nazi cancer would never have taken hold in Ukraine if Russia had invaded and restored Yanukovych in 2014 instead of trying to buy off the oligarchs in one of the most spectacularly misguided attempts ever.