Dear friends
Very quick update: big news, Dorian (finally!) turned to the north and, even better, he weakened down to a (still very powerful) CAT2 hurricane. See for yourself:
The only down side is that the wind field has expanded, which they always do when a hurricane weakens.
All in all, we are safely hidden inside a sturdy building and we are cautiously optimistic.
Hugs and cheers,
The Saker
That’s good news, other good news are waiting for you in your box when turn back safely. God bless !
may all be well with you and your family…
if my unfounded imagination is right,
Dorian is just the first of one too many too come…
some could be at CAT infinity
if my unfounded imagination is right,
we are all now officially ‘collateral damage’ grade
pls be safe
Thanks God for the good news!
Sounds good news. Kia kaha Saker.
I´m happy to read you again..!
God bless you and your family.
Kind regards..!
On the linked page you can see what this storm did to the Bahamas:
http://www.severe-weather.eu/news/24-hours-of-hurricane-dorian-grand-bahama-devastated-reports/
Stay safe Saker….
God bless you! ❤️
Key Messages for Hurrucane Dorian
Advisory 46: 5:00 PM EDT Wed Sep 04, 2019
https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/graphics_at5.shtml?key_messages
NOAA said the winds were 185mph gusting to 220. That would be a F3/F4 tornado wind speed. Ever see a tornado path? Nothing,,, NOTHING survives. This was supposedly a 200 mile wide tornado. All buildings and trees would be gone along with all life. Watching people standing on the balcony and sending pictures of the storm leads me to question this. NOAA is a known Global Warming advocate and has been caught fudging the numbers. I’d love to see the raw data but would bet that’s been corrupted as well. Ventusky and Earth weather sites had the winds at 100-110mph at all times. I’d buy that. Of course there will be massive flooding since the storm remained over the Bahamas several days. NOAA is a government agency and like all US government agencies,,, it has an agenda.
Oh well,,, Comment didn’t get posted. Wow…. even this site! Not to worry,,, I won’t comment again….
You need to look again.It was posted a while ago,and I just checked ,its thee.MOD
Gordon Duff is again spruiking 9/11 was a nuclear melt job. He says cars a kilometre from the twin towers were radiated and destroyed.
Not the sharpest pencil in the box is Gordon.
Aluminium and iron are a exothermic combination.
Plenty of magnesium in big plane structures and mechanics. Magnesium is very combustible in the kind of circumstances present in strucken towers.
High wind draw speeds had no trouble feeding flames.and could certainly smelt the alloys mentioned.
Enormous tonnage overhead each impact location. Big buildings wobble. The vertical beams softened to a very very dull red but highly ductile state. Then a floor level is collapsed. Then it just a hundred thousand tonne mass percussively, floor by floor, sledgehammering down the entire structure after that.
So yes I think that the collapses of the twin towers could and very very likely were the result of fire and exothermic reactions. There was no controlled demolition.
As for tower 7 and the many gushing smarty-dud theories about controlled demolition. They fail logic too. Some 100’s of thousands of tonnes had been sledgehammered into the foundations pit for the WTC site. The base for the core spine of tower 7 and even the founding of it outside walls could very likely have been swept out from under tower 7. Tower 7 collapse was not a controlled demolition.
Yes there does seem to have been a conspiracy to strike the towers. But the collapse was I would say a surprise to everyone.
I am glad to hear. Be safe. God bless!
I am glad that it did not make landfall in the projected area but I wonder how Donald ‘DUCK” explains his ‘landfall’ scenario in a state on the other side of Florida? Need I ask?