by Pepe Escobar (cross-posted with the Asia Times by special agreement with the author)
Bob Woodward’s book and the ‘resistance’ op-ed look increasingly like a sophisticated psy-ops scheme and a prelude for a ‘Deep State’ coup
We now live in a psy-ops world. The latest Deep Throat War in Washington bears all the elements of an epic of the genre. Fear: Trump in the White House, by Bob Woodward, who remains an associate editor at the Washington Post, will be released next week, on the 17th anniversary of 9/11.
This, in turn, will divert attention from the fact that the former, Bush era-coined Global War on Terror has metastasized into an all-American Rebels With A Cause special, featuring support for the “moderate rebels” al-Qaeda in Syria, former Jabhat al-Nusra, now Hayat Tahrir al-Sham.
In the wake of Fear, a Deep Throat surged out of nowhere in the form of an anonymous Op-Ed in the New York Times, which spilled the beans on Trumpian chaos in the White House.
Post-modern cynics were left wondering if this one-two walks and talks like a tie-in, it must be a tie-in. The Washington Post is the property of multi-billionaire Jeff “Amazon” Bezos and it has been on a permanent collision course with President Donald Trump.
And yet the Post may be seething now because Deep Throat, this time around, actually helped the competition. Adding insult to injury, the Times timed the release of its bombshell Op-Ed for the day after the Post’s strategic “leak” of Woodward’s book.
The heart of the matter is that the possible tie-in plays to the simple premise – extolling the role of a small “resistance” or the good guys. They are driven to protect “our values” and “our institutions” from dangerously chaotic Trump.
Post-truth cynics also cannot help being reminded of the historical precedence of a 1970s “resistance” – at the Nixon White House – who leaked to the press that “Tricky Dick” was out of control and was kept in check by true American patriots.
The current Deep Throat War is more like the case of a fractioned Deep State out for revenge on Trump via its media arm. The one-two tie-in – Woodward’s book and the “resistance” Op-Ed – looks increasingly like a sophisticated psy-ops – a prelude for a Deep State white coup.
All those creatures in the swampland
At the heart of the “resistance” is Russia. Trump, who was egged on by the divide-and-rule personal advice from Henry Kissinger since before the inauguration, essentially wants better relations with Russia to try to detach Moscow from the strategic partnership with Beijing.
Virtually everyone surrounding the president, not to mention most Deep State factions, are opposed to this.
And this brings me back to the “gutless” Op-Ed, according to the Trump administration, by a “senior official,” according to the Times. It argued that Trump was always against moves to counter proverbial Russian aggression before he finally acquiesced.
Now, compare it with Republicans on Capitol Hill, who forced the White House to impose even stronger sanctions on Russia. And yet they do not label themselves as “resistance.”
The anonymous “resistance” warrior has to be put in context with Trump’s basic instinct of trying, at least, to put together an Art of the Deal dialogue with North Korea and Russia.
This is seen by the mainstream media as a “preference for autocrats and dictators,” such as Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong Un, over America’s “allied, like-minded nations.” Again, this sounds like something straight from the editorial pages of the Washington Post and the New York Times.
The arcane rules in Washington determine that whistleblowing should proceed only via two authorized forms. This involves a leak, as in Mark Felt, the original Deep Throat, to the Post, or leaking official documents, as in Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers.
Digital smuggling, as in the Edward Snowden case, or receiving digital files from insiders, as in Julian Assange and WikiLeaks, is strictly off-limits.
The “resistance” bears no documents. Instead, the “resistance” warrior tries to make the case that Trump is not running the show as the real protagonists are anonymous functionaries who can be equally praised as “patriots,” according to the Times, or derided as “traitors,” or “TREASON?” as Trump tweeted.
Curiously enough, the site MyBookie lists the odds for the US president charging the “resistance” warrior with treason at 1-2, which is more likely than Trump being impeached by 2020 at 3-1.
Meanwhile, there is no debate whatsoever on the dire consequences of removing a sitting president – as alluded by the “resistance” warrior – because he’s unwilling to let US-Russia confrontation degenerate into a nuclear red alert.
It would be hard to dismiss the President when he says: “I’m draining the Swamp, and the Swamp is trying to fight back.”
Relieving the golden age of journalism
Now, compare all these post-truth, psy-ops creatures in this new swampland with a swampland of years gone by, masterfully depicted by Seymour “Sy” Hersh in his latest book Reporter.
No-nonsense living legend Sy describes himself as “a survivor from the golden age of journalism.” He seems to marvel at the fact he is just a guy from the Midwest who “began his career as a copyboy for a small news agency that covered crime, fires and the courts there.”
Roughly 11 years later, he was “a freelance reporter in Washington working for a small antiwar news agency” and “sticking two fingers in the eyes of a sitting president” by revealing “a horrific American massacre and being rewarded for it.”
Now, that has the merit of recovering the true meaning of “resistance” by documenting the story of a war gone wrong.
Sy may not be an epic writer in the Norman Mailer mold or wallow in the onomatopoeia orgy of an innovative Tom Wolfe. He is more like a Chicago streetfighter, packing myriad punches as quotes, many of them from anonymous players cultivated for decades on the basis of mutual trust. All the while, he would layer them into a vivid story – not a shadowy hagiography.
In this “I did it, my way” journey, we do get a walking, talking tour of the golden age of journalism, complete with the terrific step-by-step thriller of how Sy unveiled the My Lai massacre.
Even after all the prizes and accolades for one of the greatest scoops of the 20th century, it is poignant to know Sy “still wanted a newspaper job.” He got it – first at a magazine, The New Yorker, and then finally at The New York Times, “where I wanted to be” and “where my reporting would have [an] immediate impact.”
Sy conveys the excitement of his first trip as an on-off foreign correspondent, now forced to convert his legwork skills into writing on deadline. He was off to North Vietnam, “money belt tucked away, via Bangkok and Vientiane, where I was to be met by a North Vietnamese official and put on one of the irregular flights from Laos to Hanoi.”
When finally hired by the Times as a staff writer, his career “began with a roar – at the Paris peace talks.”
Sy later wrote a series of front-page stories about the CIA’s heroin ratline, an essential part of the agency’s covert ops in Southeast Asia. The ratline was first reported in a book by Alfred McCoy, then a graduate student at Yale and now a history professor at the University of Wisconsin.
Sy ended up receiving the proverbial CIA “visit,” someone from “the Agency’s so-called dirty tricks bureau.” It didn’t matter that he had quoted “a former CIA officer with years of experience in Vietnam as saying that McCoy’s work was “10% tendentious and 90% of the most valuable contribution I can think of.”
For the CIA, Sy was running amok.
Kissinger: more relevant than Watergate
It is enlightening to know how he “kept the hell away from the Watergate story” – even though he played tennis with Woodward “as Watergate moved from scandal to impeachment.”
One reason had to do with the fact that, in the end, the Post relied entirely on a single source, Deep Throat, while Sy was journalism’s Muhammad Ali, packing quotes verbal punches.
Another, more worrying, is that the Times editorial heavyweights “had been assured by Kissinger that the Post was making a big mistake.” Kissinger said: “The Post would be embarrassed.”
Sy was more interested in “a secret world in Washington” – code for Deep State machinations. But then in one of his reports, he finally got the message when senior editors advised him to “run it by Henry [Kissinger]. Sy was incredulous: “Run it by Henry and Dick [Helms]? They were the architects of the idiocy and criminality I was desperate to write about.”
The criminality ran deep. It included the secret bombing of Cambodia and the CIA’s covert ops to destroy Salvador Allende’s government in Chile (in his confirmation testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Kissinger produced at best a qualified lie: “The CIA had nothing to do with the coup, to the best of my knowledge and belief.”)
Sy also exposed Kissinger’s secret talks in early 1971 in Islamabad with Pakistani president Yahya Khan, then the one and only go-between to arrange Nixon’s visit to China in early 1972. Khan’s army had slaughtered as many as three million people to suppress the secession in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh). Yet Kissinger had to remain mute to protect his prized messenger to Mao.
Chapter 14 of Reporter, titled Me and Henry, also details Kissinger “wiretapping friend and foe – especially his foes – in the bureaucracy.” Sy went all-out for what he qualifies as Kissinger’s “immorality and deceit” – at a time when he kept absolute control over US foreign policy. Kissinger “escaped any possible sanction” for his wiretapping with the threat that he would resign unless the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing canceled what he called a stain in his “public honor.”
The Price of Power, Sy’s book on Kissinger, published in 1983, ended up reconstructing in excruciating detail fours years of US foreign policy. It remains a must read. Kissinger’s reaction: “I haven’t read the book,” adding, “what you read is a slimy lie.”
The book on Cheney; bring it on
While Woodward over the years excelled as Washington prime hagiographer and court stenographer (now reconstructed as court smasher) Sy kept breaking major stories, few more devastating than torture in Abu Ghraib’s prison in Iraq in 2004. Sy painfully recognizes that Abu Ghraib did not change the course of the Iraq war, “just as the My Lai story had not ended the Vietnam War or its brutality.”
And the same applies to what really happened at the Obama administration’s killing of Osama bin Laden in 2011. The Deep State prevailed; Sy could not possibly publish this story in the US. It came out in 2015 in the London Review of Books.
The game-changer was bound to be Sy’s work-in-progress magna opus on Dick “Darth Vader” Cheney. Unlike Woodward on Trump, Sy perfectly understands the problem posed by “many hundreds of interviews…none cited by name”: a “book full of secrets” with players “still involved inside the intelligence and military communities posed a high risk of legal action.”
So he went back to the bin Laden story, where he shows how Pakistani intel was betrayed by the Obama administration: “The possibility that two dozen Navy SEALS could escape observation and get to bin Laden without some help from the Pakistani military and intelligence communities was nil, but the White House press corps bought the story.”
It will take the last of the greats from “the golden age of journalism” to write the definitive account of the Cheney regime – who reduced the entire White House press corps to mere puppets. This enterprise would convey what Fear is really about, not a fuzzy hatchet job taking sides in a still in progress establishment civil war.
In parallel, in the truth-is-fiction neo-Matrix world, “inconvenient” presidents are axed. In House of Cards, Frank Underwood is dead
– as decreed by the Netflix God.
So the stage will soon be set for House of Trump. Much to the chagrin of the “resistance.” Kevin Spacey might even get his old job back.
Pepe’s trip back to the 60’s and Sy Hersh is important. We can see the half-century of Sy and a very few good people who stood for Truth against the Beast.
Everything in the USA media has changed. There is no space in MSM for Truth, for shaming of the Hegemon, for exposing the workings of the IC Deep State and the corruption and menace of the MIC.
All we have now are a few very good analysts, like Pepe Escobar, and a few very active blogs like Saker’s Vineyard.
But everyone is under threats, attacks and suffer from financial limitations.
Think of the thin line of reportage and comment potential that is extant today:
Saker, MOA, FRN, R-I, theDuran in English language; with sources of reliable information being mostly Russian, Colonel Cassad, Sputniknews, RT, Ria.ru. Thereafter, we have Voltairenet (Thierry Meyssan) and various voices like Ishchenko and Ostashko, Alexander Rogers, and some experts in military matters.
Bits and pieces also come from other nations, like Iran’s PressTV, and China’s various voices of government. But all these are very limited for facts. They actually give us insights into government policy, not wisdom or news we need to know. All governments hide what we need to know. It’s their nature, regardless of who they are.
What we have seen over the last half-century is Tyranny as policy. It has a nice face, no boots marching and tanks rolling down our capital boulevards. But as treacherous as any fascist or totalitarian regime.
It has strangled the Truth. We simply have no way to get at the Truth much less distribute or broadcast it.
Assange is being murdered in hellish imprisonment. Kim Dotcom is marginalized. Jones’s Infowars has been destroyed. Prisonplanet is next. NoQuarter.net is gone (death threat, obviously).
Cable news has one voice: Tucker Carlson on Fox.
OANN did a great job by one young man going immediately to East Ghouta and disproving the lies about chemical attacks.
Everything is totally controlled.
We see nothing of wars on TV. That is why they go on for 17 years.
Even previously, since Gulf War, embedding the journalists controls them totally. They report only what the commanders want reported. And no one dares to step outside those barriers. We learn nothing of importance.
It took Sy Hersh to expose the horrors in Iraq.
Reporting, news, opinion pieces cannot and do not stop wars. But they do describe the truth of them and become the historical record.
Most Americans don’t even know the crimes of the Regime that rules over them.
And today, the US has declared it will wage sanction war on the ICC if any American, Israeli or ally is brought up on war crimes charges. It has come full circle. The fascists will hang the people representing Rule of Law.
Thank God for Sy Hersh, Pepe, Saker and this tiny place on Earth where some Truth can be spoken.
Jesus wept, Larchmonter, what a tour de force. I yield the floor to you for a some time while I catch up on needed rest in addition to making sure we have enough diesel for the generator, food for the children and other sundry supplies and tasks for the budding crisis. At this time ain’t nobody here to assist us, everyone is gone.
The coup against President Trump has been in process since before the counting of votes was completed, the cries for impeachment were extant within days of the election, long before President Trump took the oath of office. Surely at least some of you readers and posters remember those snivels from the opposition camp.
“…It has a nice face, no boots marching and tanks rolling down our capital boulevards.” Interesting statement, my friend, very interesting. If this rolling coup continues, CehSha may well see boots marching and tanks rolling, but they will not be foreign boots or foreign tanks, they will be American boots and American tanks rolling down the boulevards of American towns and cities. Last time I looked, part of the oath American soldiers take involves defense of country from enemies both ‘foreign and domestik’. Perhaps ‘mad dog’ Mattis (I will not call him by his rank until he proves to me he is worthy of that rank) would be well advised to remember that oath he took and contemplate defending the office, the country and the man he serves. Or is he nothing but a politically oriented senior officer whose upraised finger is forever testing the direction of the wind and changing his loyalties to safeguard his pension? The world wonders.
Auslander
Auslander
Some of my favourite analysts:
I have allowed this comment through on this one occasion. In future please write a comment that focuses on the post and not just links to websites. I have put the full name of the analyst above the links. Mod
William Engdahl
https://journal-neo.org/author/william-engdahl/
Melkulangara Bhadrakumar
https://www.strategic-culture.org/authors/melkulangara-bhadrakumar.html
Alastair Crooke
https://www.strategic-culture.org/authors/alastair-crooke.html
Andrei Martynov has an awesome blog.
https://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/2014/
I think you forgot one of the best on the ME:
https://ejmagnier.com/2016/11/23/syria-and-iraq-caught-in-between-the-new-analysts-and-the-politicised-media/
Not for publication, just information:
I don’t know if it is intentional, but this (very worthwhile as a straight) piece repeats a large chunk of text in the body text and also then repeats the conclusion, with an added random part-sentence. If it’s not an intentional flourish of style, an edit would help.
Just sayin’
[The Saker has been notified. Sorry, But I’m just the mod and not authorised to edit articles. The Mod.]
Ah, I thought this was longer than the typical Pepe article. Writers who write for a publication learn the length that the editors desire. I’d imagine that telling a story or making a point in the 800 or 1000 words allowed becomes almost second nature. Its a discipline that some of today’s modern internet writers with unlimitted electrons available could benefit from learning. :)
All these wonderful relevations and not word one about aipac, jews, israel, pnac, etc.
Makes one go: hmmmmmm
See, that is why I at least respect Jimmy Moglia, even if I find him a bit timid in the speaking to power department…
Sy Hersh is a Jew.
Makes us wonder: hmmmmm
Why skunk up a good article with drek about drek?
Because you have only one thing in your noggin?
I’ve always had quite a lot of respect for Seymour Hersh, less so for Bob Woodward. Although, to be fair, Woodward did accuse the Clinton Foundation of corruption and Hillary for refusing to address the issue during the 2016 election. Nevertheless, suggesting that the events surrounding Woodward’s book are evidence of a psyop seems a bit of a stretch to me.
Woodward is still the court stenographer. Its only now that the Imperial court is at war with the current King. Woodward is still repeating what the Imperial court wants to tell.
A difference between Woodward’s reporting and Hersh’s reporting is that Woodward knows that his book will be praised in the corporate media. Hersh knows that his books will be attacked in the corporate media. Thus Woodward can get away with relying on the gossip of a few anonymous sources. All Woodward has to do is to avoid any major gaffes, and the corporate media will cover up the rest and praise and promote the book. Hersh knows his work will be attacked and any small mistakes will be nit-picked and magnified and used to try to discredit the entire work. This makes Hersh more careful about getting multiple sources, the Muhamamed Ali barrage of punches as Pepe so colorfully describes, in self-defense against the attacks that are sure to come at his important exposes.
For someone wanting to know the history of the last 60 years or so, a good place to begin would be with a catalog of Sy Hersh’s work. They should go beyond that of course, but it would be a good place to start.
Ah, dudes, this story is repeated twice in the copy. Some editing is needed here.
The story I’m waiting for is Sy’s report on the current Russiagate scandal. He told Butowsky he was working on a “long-form journalism” report on that subject, to expose it as a disinformation campaign started by John Brennan.
Although Sy has taken pains to distance himself from the Butowsky audio recording, and any number of people have bought into that (including Colonel Pat Lang, who banned me from his site over the issue), there is little doubt that the tape states what Sy believes – that murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich was in contact with Wikileaks to sell DNC emails to them, and that there is an FBI report that proves this. Once that is proven, the entire senior staff of the FBI goes down – which is more than enough motivation for Sy to want to distance himself from that personal threat to himself. Not to mention that he likely compromised his source in that Butowsky phone call (which was organized by a friend of Lang, according to him) as well as probably making his other contacts wary of talking to him in the future, which is a real problem for a journalist who relies on inside sources.
Bob Woodward is ex Naval Intelligence. One has to wonder if he ever left it. He became famous for exposing Richard Nixon. Well, he did not exactly expose Nixon, as he ruined him and in the process creating the false image that the US has a “free” press.
Nixon is today remembered for the Watergate affair, and everybody thinks that he ordered the burglary in that hotel. He did not. This was done behind his back, but he did cover up his subsequent discovery of the affair, for which he was forced to resign. Was the Watergate affair the true reason why he was harassed and forced to resign by the “free” press? No.
Nixon was no angel, bearing in mind his contribution to the Vietnam War which, in all honesty, he did not start. However, he was after detante with the Soviet Union, and the elite of the day did not like this one bit. After that comes Watergate and Bob Woodward.
Today we have Donald Trump who, ostensibly wants better relations with Russia. Bob Woodward makes another appearance, this time writing a book instead of publishing articles in the Washington Post. The same old trick from the 1970’s is again been used. Big mistake. Now it becomes apparent Woodward is acting upon orders, trying to destroy another President.
On another thread a link was provided to an analysis of how Nixon was brought down and, more important, why.
https://journal-neo.org/2018/05/22/the-geopolitics-of-impeachment-recalling-nixon-in-the-trump-era/
I think the author drew somewhat on Russ Baker’s Family of Secrets, about the Bush family. Baker posits a completely different narrative for the Nixon takedown than the “standard” one.
The “facade” reason is never the real reason. That is true also of the in-the-offingTrump takedown.
Katherine
Nicely written article. Although it’s true that the real reason for many events is not the purported reason, the author’s conclusion seems unfounded to me. The actions taken by Trump since his inauguration simply do not support this conclusion. The Trump tax cut was pure standard Republican fare, serving the interests of the wealthy and corporations. On trade issues, Trump needs the support of Congress, and the Republican Party is already on record as being completely opposed to becoming some kind of advocate of the working classes. So I don’t think that the level of threat Trump poses to trade issues warrants the campaign against him.
Editing done. Apologies for the Oops! (smiles)
Trump and the Qanon phonies are barely hooked on phonics. Orange chump is first class imbecile propped up for years by zionist new york mob connnects. They saved him when he was bankrupt in the 90’s, now he’s returning the favour and paying his goyim debts. Clueless deplorables will sing another tune when they’ll be raped during the next bailout. Trump created an intractable debt trap and deplorables will be fiscally fleeced next year. Stable genius is unwilling and can’t fix the iron triangle of zionist capture, MIC graft and dysfuntional congress. It will be war or economic collapse…
Spot on, Sol. The one good thing about Agent Orange is that he’s accelerating the inevitable collapse of the US as a functioning country, hence reducing the chance of an explosive (i.e. externally damaging) collapse, as opposed to a less harfmul implosive one.
It will suck to be an American, for sure… Just as it sucks today being an Iraqi, a Syrian, a Lybian, an Afghani – the karma needs to be repaid.
The Mexicans will regret not building The Wall, to protect themselves from roving gangs of gringos.
Just a conjecture: Mark Felt, “felt Alzheimer’s advancing” and decided to come clean on what the real identity of Deep Throat was, admitting the he was behind the leaks to Woodward. Making this kind of judgement, for someone who has beginning Alzheimer’s, is at least peculiar.
The heavy bass, Kissinger, as a deep throated source, certainly benefited from exposing Nixon’s impeachment. He basically was running the show in solo behind the latter’s back.
While Tricky Dick was mired in the scandal, Kissinger became the elder statesman, without any stain on his shining armor.
As usual, Pepe Escobar magnifies the social and cultural criminality and moral degradation ingrained in the bi-partisan elite establishment which Si Hersh exposes as did his soul brother predecessor, Izzy Stone. Escobar gives sources for the concerned public to go to in order to understand the macro plot in play. That plot is capitalist imperialism in all its insidious degrees and levels designed by the haves to divide and conquer the have-nots, katy bar the door on the bestial consequences. if and when the multitude ever see clearly, the wrong-doers will hopefully reap the whirlwind.
Article says, “And the same applies to ***what really happened*** at the Obama administration’s killing of Osama bin Laden in 2011.”
I respect Sy Hersh very much, but he got the “Bin Laden raid” wrong.
He promotes the CIA’s assertion that they actually got Bin Laden.
Is that “what really happened”?
After the raid:
The body of so-called “Bin Laden” was immediately thrown overboard mafia-style to the bottom of the ocean.
Before we got to even see it.
Photos of the body were ordered destroyed or turned over to the CIA, out of reach of FOIA requests.
The helmet cameras were at first heralded! Hurrah !!, everyone said. But then we were told, “they never existed”.
The witnesses, the Seals, were ordered silent forever. No witnesses. Forever.
The DNA was handled by the CIA itself.
At the same time the CIA is claiming, “We got Bin Laden”, they are eliminating all evidence.
Who trusts the CIA?
It was a year and a half before the book “No Easy Day” was published by one of the Seals.
The Seal that got the best look at the body, took pictures of the body, collected bodily fluid samples and compared the body to pictures he had brought on the raid, said in his book that he had refused to identify the body as Bin Laden. The Seal said on 60 Minutes that when he got back to base the CIA came in and told him and General McRaven, “you got him, it was Bin Laden”. The CIA. The CIA told the Seals and General McRaven it was bin Laden.
Three years later another Seal broke ranks and came out into the lime light.
His version and the first Seal’s version do not match up. But the second Seal explained it as, “fog of war”.
The second Seal, who is credited with shooting “Bin Laden”, said he did seven things in less than one second.
That is the total time he had to look at “bin Laden”.
Less than one second and doing multiple things. And while wearing night vision goggles.
He said, while wearing night vision goggles, that he:
1) jumped into the doorway.
2) id’ed the figure as bin Laden
3) made sure he wasn’t going to shoot any women or children
4) raised his weapon because the figure was taller than he expected
5) noticed a weapon on a nearby shelf
6) saw that the figure appeared to be reaching for the weapon
7) put several shots into the skull of the figure
He said that all took place in less than one second and then he continued into the room and the next in his sweep.
Never stopped to look at “the mess” he had made.
There is no evidence, but there are two witnesses, one which refused to id the body as bin Laden
and the other had less than a second to make his id while wearing night vision goggles
and dealing with the fog of war.
Witnesses ordered to be silent forever. Pictures destroyed. Helmet cameras “never existed”.
Body immediately thrown overboard to the bottom of the ocean mafia-style. The CIA handled the DNA.
The CIA told us all what to believe, as they were destroying all evidence.
Their claim was echoed and multiplied a million times in the news media.
Hersh has written a lot of great articles in his day, but his piece on the OBL assassination could best be described as both incredible (in the literal sense of the word) and bordering on moronic. Whoever was murdered in that building, if anyone, was certainly not OBL who had died years earlier, probably as early as mid-December of 2001 of kidney failure due to his genetically derived Marfan syndrome. This 21st century Immanuel Goldstein no longer evoked an ecstatic 2 minutes of hate, and even his corpse had outlived its usefulness. Dead men tell no tales as can be attested by the elimination of the Seal Team 6 perps in a Charge of the Light Brigade fiasco in Afghanistan. Their’s truly was to “do and die.” One can only wonder why Hersh would besmirch a stellar record with this piece of dreck.