Rostov-on-Don is a port city and the administrative center of Rostov Oblast and the Southern Federal District of Russia. It lies to the southeast of the East European Plain, on the Don River, 32 kilometers from the Sea of Azov. City was founded by the Empress of Russia Elizaveta Petrovna in December 15th, 1749.
Rostov-on-Don Areal View
Winter and Christmas in Rostov-on-Don
Rostov-on-Don
Cool car trip from Rostov-on-Don to Tuapse with a map.
Tuapse is a town in Krasnodar Krai, Russia, situated on the northeast shore of the Black Sea, south of Gelendzhik and north of Sochi.
Unusual bus ride in Rostov-On-Don
3/24/15 – GermanWings 9525 – ridiculously blamed on a “suicidal co-pilot”
10/31/15 (Halloween) – Kogalymavia/Metrojet 9268 – ridiculously blamed on “ISIS”
3/19/16 – FlyDubai FZ981 – …
I don’t believe this last one was an accident either. Yes, it was windy, but according to experts not in such a way as to make a landing impossible. The plane attempted a landing, then circled for two hours (two hours!), then reapproached the airport and crashed almost dive-bomber style with high speed (allegedly 400 km/h), bursting into smithereens, which is what happens when the airplane is made of aluminium and not, as on 9/11 2001, of CGI video pixels, which easily pierce steel girders.
The sight of the debris reminded me of GermanWings 9525, which was steered at top speed into a mountain range. What’s the story with that flight?
Someone must have compromised and abused the Airbus remote control system, murdering 150 people. We can only guess who that someone might be. But I have no doubt this was an Anglozionist terrorist attack, like so many others.
Some people doubt the existence or feasability of remote control systems but drone technology clearly proves them wrong.
A few weeks after the incident, on April 30, 2015, German press reported the Airbus corporation were to file a criminal complaint because of industrial espionnage.
Google: Industriespionage Airbus
Google: industrial espionnage Airbus
Two weeks earlier, on April 15, 2015, German press reported that authorities were looking into the possibility of equipping passenger airplanes with remote control systems to counter highjacks and mythical “pilot suicides”.
Google: Germanwings Fernsteuerung
They are lying, of course: Remote control systems have already been installed on passenger airliners. And one can understand they’re good to have when the airplane is still controllable but the crew is incapacitated. Problems arise when such systems are compromised. With all this Anglozionist spying, this danger is very real.
Airbus, I imagine, have their own system. Boeing seems to have something called Uninterruptible Autopilot.
Boeing wins patent on uninterruptible autopilot system
(Homeland Security News Wire, 4 December 2006)
» Boeing’s is, of course, not the first autopilot technology in existence, but this one has been designed with counterterrorism first and foremost in mind. Not only is it “uninterruptible” — so that even a tortured pilot cannot turn it off — but it can be activated remotely via radio or satellite by government agencies. […] “There is a need for a technique that ensures the continuation of the desired path of travel of a vehicle by removing any type of human decision process that may be influenced by the circumstances of the situation, including threats or further violence onboard the vehicle,” the patent application explains. «
Coming back to FlyDubai FZ981, there is the odd fact of a dive-bomber style high-speed descent – and subsequent devastating crash.
Was that due to the remote piloting system being used in a terrorist manner? Via satellite? Via airplane circling over central Ukraine at ~400 km distance?
Unlike flying saucers or other kookular weapons, remote piloting systems are not only technologically feasible but already implemented and put into practice in various civil and military applications of drone technology. It must be taken into account when considering these horrible passenger airplane incidents.
Thanks, Lumi
Many people in Russia are asking the same questions.
There are some rumors also, that pilot was in a depressed mood before flying. He could be blackmailed by the life of his family to crash his airplane.
There seems to have been a build up in the media over a period of time this idea of suicidal airline pilots as if to put the thought into peoples heads. I ask myself, why aren’t bus drivers considered suicidal.
MH370, Air Asia off Indonesia, Geman Wings… I guess wait and see what happens with this one.
Peter,
Another version is gaining momentum, that it was a bomb placed in UAE.
Lumi,
It looks like you’re right about the remote piloting system being used as a terror method. Today, another Boeing made an emergency landing in Moscow, due to the system indicating an engine vibration. This airplane is the same modification as the Boeing on Rostov. The reasons for the system malefaction are unknown.
http://www.kp.ru/daily/26506.5/3375369/
Ten years ago, Medvedev bought about 150 Boeings instead of investing this money into development of the Russian aircraft industry. He said that it was “easier” to pay. money.
So, the first explanation made up by Russian media was “bad weather”, and even a low-flying jetstream. The second explanation is now that the pilot was tired, fatigued, exhausted.
None of these explanations can explain why the Boeing was circling for two hours to then strike down in a ~45° angle as if it were a dive-bomber.
Lumi, you are right. We will be watching for further development.
Latest news consistent with remote controlled crash: nonsensical steep dive, vertical stabilizer locked, airplane not reacting to pilot input.
Boeing-Absturz von Rostow: Medien berichten über “unmenschliche Schreie” im Cockpit
Just like with 3/24/15 GermanWings 9525, it’s grosso modo clear what happened, although we don’t know the details. The plane was crashed into the ground via its remote piloting system, the passengers and crew were murdered by Anglozionist terrorists.
Thank you for you great series on Russian cities, Scott.
It must be an eerie coincidence that you posted this on the day this very city is all over the news because of a terrible accident. Anyway, I’m taking your post as an opportunity to talk about something else in connection with Rostov.
I very much like the 3rd video called “Cool car trip”. However, my downright favourite is the last one with the choir starting to sing during the bus ride. This is just great – absolutely heartwarming.
This incident may be symptomatic for the difference between Russia and the West. Just imagine what would happen in a big Western city, if a choir would start singing – not only a song but a patriotic song, during a ride on public transport.
How would people react? I am sure, most people would find it at least embarrassing if not worse. A patriotic song? These guys must be far right, if not fascist, right? – That’s the way we are taught to think.
Not so in this case. In the video, people are smiling, it obviously makes them feel good. Even more noteworthy, the comment section underneath the YouTube video is unanimous in it’s approval, with some of them proudly repeating words of the song, and many others expressing words of endearment towards their mother country. Amazing.
Thank you for your question.
1. You wrote: “It must be an eerie coincidence that you posted this on the day this very city is all over the news because of a terrible accident.”
It’s not a coincidence. I put this post together after I have heard about this catastrophe, so our readers would get an idea how Rostov-On-Don looks like.
2. You wrote: “A patriotic song? These guys must be far right, if not fascist, right? ”
The song on a video is a folk song. People everywhere love their own folk songs.
We’ll Go Out to the Fields With My Horse At Night (Выйду в Поле Ночью с Конем)
“I and my horse are walking across the field”
I’ll go out to the fields with my horse at night.
We will go quietly in the dark of night.
We will go – the two of us -across the fields.
We will go – the two of us -across the fields.
We will go with my horse – the two of us -across the fields.
We will go with my horse – the two of us -across the fields.
At night, by God’s grace. there are countless stars in the sky.
Not a soul is around the field.
Only my horse and I are walking across the fields.
Only my horse and I are walking across the fields.
Only my horse and I are walking across the fields.
Only my horse and I are walking across the fields.
We are walking across the field with my horse
I will mount my horse.
Carry me across the field.
Carry me across my endless fields.
Let me take one last look
At the place where sunrise is born in the fields.
Oh, the bilberry colored light, the crimson sunrise
Does this place exist, or does it not?
Oh, the bilberry colored light, the crimson sunrise
Does this place exist, or does it not?
My dear field, my water springs,
The lights of distant villages.
The golden rye and the curly flax-trees
I am in love with you, Russia.
The golden rye and the curly flax-trees
I am in love with you, Russia.
The bread harvest will be good this year.
We’ve had worse luck, everything will pass.
O, sing golden rye, sing curly flax-trees,
Sing about how I am in love with Russia.
O, sing golden rye, sing curly flax-trees…
I and my horse together are walking across the field.
Here, you can find a good translation for this song and the professional choir singing it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBDDGMOC0ps
3. You wrote: “This incident (singing a song) may be symptomatic for the difference between Russia and the West.”
I can see you have never took a bus ride in a country like Israel, otherwise you would hear this coming from the speakers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyThxevR8Dw
regards
Thank you for your response which I found a trifle unexpected in it’s style, to be frank.
Scott, I think it’s very considerate of you to respond to my posts that extensively. But somehow I’m getting the odd feeling that you’re investing a lot of words in trying to prove me (as well as other contributors to this blog, by the way) wrong. I don’t know what motivates you in that since I did not attack you, or your views, in any way.
Well then, please allow me to reply to your points.
1. If it’s “not a coincidence” that you posted this on that specific day, fine. No problem there. It looked like a coincidence to me as you did not refer to the accident. This however had nothing to do with my actual topic.
2. I called the song a “patriotic song”; you’re countering that the song is a “folk song”. As if one thing excluded the other. I don’t know about you but for me a song with the recurring line “I am in love with you, Russia” is a patriotic song, and I am sorry, I really don’t care how you or somebody else might otherwise define a patriotic song. It’s the way I understood it, and I don’t quite get your reasons for quibbling about details in this case.
3. “I can see you have never took a bus ride in a country like Israel”
– Scott, I was not talking about Israel, and the last thing I wanted was a debate about commonalities or differences between Russia and Israel. I was talking about your typical “Western” (European, if you will) country. I thought this was somehow obvious.
4. I simply wanted to describe the positive emotions that I had when I watched this clip. That’s all. There is nothing bad about patriotism, on the contrary. Actually, that was my only point, if I wanted to make any. OK?
Peace!
Dear gvp,
1. You wrote: “But somehow I’m getting the odd feeling that you’re investing a lot of words in trying to prove me (as well as other contributors to this blog, by the way) wrong.”
Are you keeping scores? Could you give me their names? Could you prove your accusations, please?
I am asking you to prove that I am attacking the contributors to this blog, I am a Director of the Research and Development for this blog. I have researched, wrote and posted about 1000 of pages of SITREPs, translations, and articles for this blog. I have been working with authors, contributors and research assistants. I suggested, put together and initially edited the first Saker’s book.
You have started commenting on March 15th, 2016. Five days ago.
You first comment was for my post about Maria Zahkarova, that you claimed was treated unfairly by me. I explained to you that it looked like you never read my post, because it was a translation that I offered for discussion. Furthermore, it’s my duty as a citizen to criticize any government and public official if they demonstrate an anti-social behavior.
Since March 15th, 2016 you have posted about two dozen posts. Not one of your comments contains any new facts or information, but exclusively dedicated to expressing unsubstantiated criticism of my work, and attacks on my personality, like the one above.
You comment only my posts. You don’t comment the posts of our other authors. You don’t comment the Saker’s posts.
Your behavior is a typical “troll” behavior.
2. You wrote: “You have an amazing story about Strelkov to tell. If true this is certainly explosive news. As you sound very sure of what you are saying, I trust you can prove your version?”
/kiev-egged-the-russian-embassy-but-maria-zakharova-is-the-one-with-egg-on-her-face-by-scott/#comment-219142
Yes. There is a big announcement coming soon.
3. You wrote: “I called the song a “patriotic song”; you’re countering that the song is a “folk song”
I responded to your words: “A patriotic song? These guys must be far right, if not fascist, right? ”
Russian patriotic songs are considered to be songs of the Great Patriotic War. Generally speaking, folk songs predate the First World War.
Folk songs are also songs of unknown authors, that’s why we call them “folk” or created by people.
The patriotic songs have known authors
.
For example, XIX century song about Imam Shamil “Don’t be afraid of me, I won’t harm you” Старинная казачья песня “Ой ся, ты ой ся”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJv4MGoHj60
Fascism was invented after the WWI.
5. You wrote: “Scott, I was not talking about Israel, and the last thing I wanted was a debate about commonalities or differences between Russia and Israel. I was talking about your typical “Western” (European, if you will) country. I thought this was somehow obvious.”
No, it’s not. You have to be more specific. If you read my previous articles and our readers’ comments, you would know that we agreed here that “the West” is a political and not a geographic term defining the European countries, the US, Canada, Australia, Japan, and Israel.
PS: I trust you are going to substantiate in regard to #1.
My God Scott,what a tragic prophecy you made : first picture – the plane comes at night above the city and made a few circles
second picture:the winter reappeared with snowstorm
third picture:the struggle of angels and demons
forth picture:the landing route
fifth picture:the peoples in the plane
I am amazed
Oh, come on. Scott. Please don’t deliberately misunderstand me.
If you insist on it I will take the time and respond to your points as best I can.
Though I’d rather not. Why? Mainly because I am afraid this is not going to be a fruitful discussion.
I am sure you are a nice, intelligent and very interesting person. Let’s not waste our time. You don’t have to agree with my points of view, please accept it if others don’t always agree with you either.
Peace! (!)
Wonderful intro! “Welcome to the new multipolar world!”