RT Television DARES to Challenge the French Intelligentsia!

In a full-blown information war if the West decides to simply cut-off RT and other Russian media from access to the Western market, what can be and should be Russia’s response be?

1) A tit-for-tat response? Some retaliatory response is essential, but should it be fully proportional? A less than full tit-for-tat response might enable Russia to keep the moral high ground – but only if the Western masses were not so brainwashed as they clearly are. So how much of response would be best remains an open question.

2) Russian media should (in my view) focus more – much, much more – on capturing the hearts and minds of peoples in Asia, Africa, and South America. That may even cause Russia to lose some of its obsession with the West and things Western. Throughout the developing world, Russian media should become an alternative to the monopolies of the Western news agencies and media. The timing seems to be right IMHO.

The more the number of people of the world who access Russian media, the lesser will the power of the Western media become. And some straight talk about the West and its hypocrisy is necessary as well. There is a time for niceties and a time for straight talk.

What’s the wonder? France is the most judaized country in the world, besides being a pioneer of “Russophobia”, inventing all the anti-Russian tropes, slanders and slogans which characterize it and remaining stuck with them (subsumed to the general slogans of “threat to ‘liberal’ – i.e. masonic – Europe” and “European crusade against Russia” – which was nevertheless a much older Catholic idea).

Antoine Arjakovsky, the fake Orthodox champion of ‘ecumenism’, is a liar like all the ‘Jesuits’ who inform his thinking. He has that very special view of Russia suppurated in France (like the infamous Polish-Napoleonic forgery, the ‘Testament of Peter the Great’) which has only a nominal relation with the reality of Russian Orthodoxy and Russian history. His grand mother was the assistant of Nicholas Berdiaev, the anti-clerical secret Bolshevik ‘agent of influence’ (“Confessor’ in the files of the Foreign Section of OGPU), inventor of the “Russian idea”, of the “Russian messianism”, in order to exonerate the international Bolsheviks and the Comintern (“The Third International is not international, but a Russian national idea”, he wrote) of their abominable crimes and calling for support of the Soviet Union (“on December 3, 1944, a strange event took place in newly liberated Paris. Nikolai Berdyaev, a religious philosopher and the best-known Russian émigré intellectual of his time, made a speech before a [baffled] audience of elderly Russian émigrés in support of the Soviet Union!”).

You won’t be surprised either that his grand father, the Fr. Dimitri Klepinin was ‘sanctified’ by the Patriarch of Constantinople, along with Mother Maria Skobtsova (a very ‘unconventional’ nun), for ‘helping Jews’ (mostly Russian, of course) by forging Baptism certificates, during the ‘Vichy era’, and proclaimed ‘Righteous Among The Nations’ by Yad Vashem! Oh, and they died in the German camps! Antoine describes his emotion at the tree planted at Yad Vashem in memory of his ‘martyr’ grand father.
Fr. Dimitri’s mother Sophia was a cousin of Zinaida Gippius, the wife of Dimitry Merezhkovsky, the famous ‘Silver Age’ couple of ardent ‘prophets’ of ‘Holy Ghost’s Kingdom Come’ idea, a ‘neo-Christianity’ opposed to the ‘official’ -Tsarist – Orthodox Church. Merezhkovsky is famous for his view of Peter the Great as the ’embodied Antichrist’, view that he shared with the ‘raskolniki’ (much loved as the precursors of Bolshevism). He ‘discovered’ the “anti-Christian nature of the Russian monarchy.” and saw the 1905 Revolution as a prelude for some kind of a religious upheaval he thought himself to be a prophet of. The writer became an ardent supporter of the civil unrest, writing pro-revolutionary verse, organizing protest parties for students. In 1913 his former friend Vasily Rozanov openly accused him of having ties with the “terrorist underground” and, as he put it, “trying to sell Motherland to Jews.”

Anything that prevents Germany from having good relations with Eastern Europe benefits both France and the Anglo-American-Zionist Empire. The French will do anything to prevent trade and good relations between Germany and Russia. They also need to keep encouraging Poland to hate Russia. France can only be strong when Germany is weak. Conversely, France would be best friends with Russia if it were in Russia’s best interest to isolate and destroy Germany. We do have a precedent: The French are still celebrating the destruction of Austia-Hungary after WW I……

I think, as a french resident and “sakerite-friendly “, that those self-proclaimed “russia specialists ” only represent themselves and much less “french intelligentsia”, it would be a bad french bashing to pretend that !
Friendship between France and Russia has very deep and resistant roots . Let me cite some other names :
Thierry Mariani who is member of parliament (LR) uses to recall that Russia saved France Three time :
at the Vienne Treaty (1815) where the tsar did not allow France to be carved into two parts which was what England and Austria wanted , at the Verdun Battle in 1917 where Russia attacked on the east front at the most critical time where the defenses were on the brink of rupture and forced germans to redeploy troops , and of course in the great patriotic war where the Wehrmacht was mainly destroyed by russian heroism , at among others : Stalingrad, Koursk , on the dniepr , etc …
France intelligentsia had for a long time entirely been dominated intellectualy by french communist party which counted in its ranks Aragon , Sartre, Picasso and all the people who counted most at the time and cherished very much frienship with communist USSR . Let me add that when tchernobyl meltdown occured , West Europe was saved from radioactive catastrophic contamination by thousands of russians “liquidators” who sacrificed their lives and their health and saved the plant from explosion in the atmosphere and west europe in the same time ? How is it possible for informed people not to be grateful toward them ?
If you search for a cultural acknowledgement of what the russians brought to european culture , go to the académie française site and read the reception speech of Dominique Fernandez to the russian -born
writer Andrei Makine . If you search for well understood geostrategic french interests you will find for instance Dominique de Margerie , Total Group CEO , who died in a supposed plane accident in moscow airport , bringing french logging and energy technology to help in the exploitation of Yamal peninsula gaz site
which has just been inaugurated by president Putin recently. A liquefied gaz ship has been named in his honor with big moustaches painted on it .
french catholicism has never been recently in war with orthodox countries contrarily to italian’s one . Italy mainly fought orthodox countries during WW II : Ethiopia , Serbia , Greece and mainly Russia and of course that is a huge memory problem which remains to settle to make really peace between orthodox and catholic churches . Recently the cuban meeting between the Moscow patriarch and the Pope has been a sign that some progresses have been met at least from the russian point of view , for instance on the ukrainian conflict . So Mr Duchesne doest not represent the opinion of the archbishop of Paris who has just been changed recently , by the way .
French people in a recent inquiry feel manipulated at 66 -80 % by their MSM which are owned by ten oligarchs ( like almost everywhere else …)
https://www.les-crises.fr/russeurope-en-exil-le-pluralisme-voila-lennemi-par-jacques-sapir/#_ftn2
So let me think that your conclusion that those who signed this text represent french intelligentsia and french people is totally irrelevant : they only represent themselves !