The above all belongs to an important half of Russia’s defences. The other at least equally important half would consists of a well organised prevention of a “coloured” sedition. (Think Brazil, Venezuela, Serbia, Ukraine………)
Moreover, Russia considers the development of US missile defense, while planning the design of new Russian weapons.
“The implementation of our plans involves the use of fundamentally new and effective means and ways of overcoming any missile defense,” says Sergey Karakayev.
One of these designs is the “Sarmat” Intercontinental Ballistic Missile – an article about which has already been published on the website “PolitiRussia”.
“For its weight and size characteristics it is similar to its predecessor (SS-18 “Satan”). But along with this we will have new types of combat equipment, a promising means of overcoming missile defenses. Most importantly, the complex is being developed and will be manufactured at the enterprises of the Russian cooperation,” said Sergei Karakayev, describing the missile.
Overcoming the enemy defenses in this case is one of the main highlights of the novelty.
“The main requirement for the new missile is a flexible response to the development of the US national missile defense system until 2030. In addition, energy should allow the missile to strike at targets not only across the North but also across the South pole,” explains the former chief of staff of the strategic missile forces Viktor Yesin.
“The new missile will be able to withstand the space echelon strike weapons, and it can be launched from almost any area and in all directions,” – said Deputy Defense Minister Yuri Borisov, describing the capabilities of the missile.
Unusual attacks, for example via the South Pole, add a headache to the American missile defense system. But many more dangers is the hypersonic combat equipment of the missile. A year ago, The Washington Times wrote that America cannot defend itself against such systems.
Moreover, if these missiles will be deployed near the village of Dombrovsky, as planned, according to the newspaper, the US will not be able to shoot them down on the approach, but also to destroy them at home. The appearance of such missiles, said Janes Information Group, will become a serious trump card for Russia in the negotiations on limiting strategic nuclear arms.
The test of the “Sarmat” missile had been scheduled for the spring of this year, but it is already the second time they have moved it. The first launch did not take place because of the unpreparedness of a launch facility. Now problems have arisen in the rocket itself.
“It’s a completely new product. It is clear that testing of new equipment can go wrong. And here, I think, we should not seek some kind of malice or far-reaching consequences. And, of course, it is better to identify problems with equipment before start than after…” said the chief editor of the “Arms Export” magazine Andrey Frolov.
“These are the risks, the things that you would expect. And I would not serve this situation from the point of view that, they say, as we all bad. We are not bad. The fact that we identified the problem in advance is good. Much better than if a rocket fell on someone’s head” – the expert of Association of military political scientists, associate Professor of political science and sociology REU nam. Plekhanov Alexander Perendzhiev said in agreeement.
And despite the rescheduling of the test for the West it is extremely difficult to gloat about it in the press, given the panic foreign media expressed about the development of the “Sarmat” in recent years.
For example, the day before the release of information about the delay, several British media agencies published horror inducing articles about the Russian missile. The Daily Mirror, Daily Express, Daily Star, and Daily Record at the same time labored panic materials that were dispersed in the Western sector of the world wide web.
“It’s a doomsday weapon so powerful that in just a few seconds can wipe a vast territory off the face of the Earth. The West has nothing to counter it, so it can easily bypass all missile defense systems”, – said the newspaper, quoting British experts.
“A huge area” comparable, for example, with the state of Texas or France as a whole. The long range of the missile also scares the British. The “Sarmat” is able to both the West and the East coast of the United States or to get into the center of London, they write.
However, it was not only the British who were alerted — the American press also wrote about the “Sarmat” cautiously, albeit more restrained. Ahead of the English counterparts, National Interest has pleased us with publications about the promising missile.
“The United States is significantly behind Russia in the development of land-based ICBMs… the project of the European missile defense and ground-based missile defense system midcourse flight (complex missile defense designed to intercept approaching warheads) in the foreseeable future will not be effective against Russian missiles,” – makes a disappointing conclusion to the publication.
Whatever rocket did not come to replace the current US “Minuteman-3”, it is unlikely it will be as awesome as the Russian, sums up the author of the National Interest.
Moreover, while the development of a new ICBM will be completed, the Russian missile defense system, too, will not stand still.
“We are working on the modernization of the “Minuteman”, but the command of the US air force told Congress that this outdated system is unlikely to provide guaranteed containment in connection with the improvement of missile defenses,” says the publication.
Maybe I would like to believe Western propaganda that carefully describes the decline of the Russian armed forces. But how to do it when the live reaction of the foreign press on the coming test of only one of our missiles is so eloquent?
When the Empire of presumption finally falters, the centurions of civilization will be waiting in the wings.
The above all belongs to an important half of Russia’s defences. The other at least equally important half would consists of a well organised prevention of a “coloured” sedition. (Think Brazil, Venezuela, Serbia, Ukraine………)
Moreover, Russia considers the development of US missile defense, while planning the design of new Russian weapons.
“The implementation of our plans involves the use of fundamentally new and effective means and ways of overcoming any missile defense,” says Sergey Karakayev.
One of these designs is the “Sarmat” Intercontinental Ballistic Missile – an article about which has already been published on the website “PolitiRussia”.
“For its weight and size characteristics it is similar to its predecessor (SS-18 “Satan”). But along with this we will have new types of combat equipment, a promising means of overcoming missile defenses. Most importantly, the complex is being developed and will be manufactured at the enterprises of the Russian cooperation,” said Sergei Karakayev, describing the missile.
Overcoming the enemy defenses in this case is one of the main highlights of the novelty.
“The main requirement for the new missile is a flexible response to the development of the US national missile defense system until 2030. In addition, energy should allow the missile to strike at targets not only across the North but also across the South pole,” explains the former chief of staff of the strategic missile forces Viktor Yesin.
“The new missile will be able to withstand the space echelon strike weapons, and it can be launched from almost any area and in all directions,” – said Deputy Defense Minister Yuri Borisov, describing the capabilities of the missile.
Unusual attacks, for example via the South Pole, add a headache to the American missile defense system. But many more dangers is the hypersonic combat equipment of the missile. A year ago, The Washington Times wrote that America cannot defend itself against such systems.
Moreover, if these missiles will be deployed near the village of Dombrovsky, as planned, according to the newspaper, the US will not be able to shoot them down on the approach, but also to destroy them at home. The appearance of such missiles, said Janes Information Group, will become a serious trump card for Russia in the negotiations on limiting strategic nuclear arms.
The test of the “Sarmat” missile had been scheduled for the spring of this year, but it is already the second time they have moved it. The first launch did not take place because of the unpreparedness of a launch facility. Now problems have arisen in the rocket itself.
“It’s a completely new product. It is clear that testing of new equipment can go wrong. And here, I think, we should not seek some kind of malice or far-reaching consequences. And, of course, it is better to identify problems with equipment before start than after…” said the chief editor of the “Arms Export” magazine Andrey Frolov.
“These are the risks, the things that you would expect. And I would not serve this situation from the point of view that, they say, as we all bad. We are not bad. The fact that we identified the problem in advance is good. Much better than if a rocket fell on someone’s head” – the expert of Association of military political scientists, associate Professor of political science and sociology REU nam. Plekhanov Alexander Perendzhiev said in agreeement.
And despite the rescheduling of the test for the West it is extremely difficult to gloat about it in the press, given the panic foreign media expressed about the development of the “Sarmat” in recent years.
For example, the day before the release of information about the delay, several British media agencies published horror inducing articles about the Russian missile. The Daily Mirror, Daily Express, Daily Star, and Daily Record at the same time labored panic materials that were dispersed in the Western sector of the world wide web.
“It’s a doomsday weapon so powerful that in just a few seconds can wipe a vast territory off the face of the Earth. The West has nothing to counter it, so it can easily bypass all missile defense systems”, – said the newspaper, quoting British experts.
“A huge area” comparable, for example, with the state of Texas or France as a whole. The long range of the missile also scares the British. The “Sarmat” is able to both the West and the East coast of the United States or to get into the center of London, they write.
However, it was not only the British who were alerted — the American press also wrote about the “Sarmat” cautiously, albeit more restrained. Ahead of the English counterparts, National Interest has pleased us with publications about the promising missile.
“The United States is significantly behind Russia in the development of land-based ICBMs… the project of the European missile defense and ground-based missile defense system midcourse flight (complex missile defense designed to intercept approaching warheads) in the foreseeable future will not be effective against Russian missiles,” – makes a disappointing conclusion to the publication.
Whatever rocket did not come to replace the current US “Minuteman-3”, it is unlikely it will be as awesome as the Russian, sums up the author of the National Interest.
Moreover, while the development of a new ICBM will be completed, the Russian missile defense system, too, will not stand still.
“We are working on the modernization of the “Minuteman”, but the command of the US air force told Congress that this outdated system is unlikely to provide guaranteed containment in connection with the improvement of missile defenses,” says the publication.
Maybe I would like to believe Western propaganda that carefully describes the decline of the Russian armed forces. But how to do it when the live reaction of the foreign press on the coming test of only one of our missiles is so eloquent?
http://www.fort-russ.com/2016/05/western-propagandists-cant-handle-sarmat.html