I am anti-war as a personal policy based on principles of love.
But sometime it is necessary to fight war with war and fire with fire to avoid the fate of being held prisoner for life in a maximum security jailhouse.
I am proud of Russian strength because it is standing on the firm ground of tough love in the short term.
I am a USer satrapped in a provincial moral swamp. Where’s the pride? Where’s the shame?
Russia will win this war if she can keep the high moral ground over the long term. But the en masse moral sands are shifting with quicksand patches waiting like venus traps.
Much is made of the Russian character honed over centuries by war and fine-tuned by a moral tradition. However, it seems to me that its character weakens with peace of the pax americana kind spreading the contagion of pox americana.
The US is beyond stupid trying to do what Napoleon and Hitler couldn’t with force which just forces Russians to their senses. Now it looks like Kissinger is going back to plan B with the new opening to the BIS SDR net for China and Russia gulls. I could be wrong. Maybe the devil can be beaten at his own game. It’s never happened before but hope springs eternal for the love deprived.
There’s a certain brittleness in high morality flying jets and dropping bombs. It dulls the mind and numbs the senses and when peace comes and the rush of war can’t fill the vacuum, the contagion of technomania makes deals in the hallways of patriarchs and presidents.
To make a long story short, love is lost in the shuffle of the deals and we simply can’t stop the wheels of illusion. We think this train don’t carry no gamblers anymore and that it will run forever, forgetting about those shifting sands and treacherous sink holes.
I support what you’re doing because we have to win in the short run if there’s to be a long run at all. It sounds like double-talk but it’s better than winning the war and losing the peace.
The world is not, nor it will ever be, ready for your alter ego Don Quixote and his ideal of love and truth. In our imperfect state, love manifest itself in different ways, capable of bringing peace and happiness, and also doom and destruction, e.g. love of war practised round the Potomac; of gold and greed practised round Wall Street and The City (London). Usually that duality brings conflict and hostility, even evil, but, sometimes, we can see it conflate in cinematic fashion by Hollywood when, allegedly, the director of a recent version of “Pearl Harbour” depicted it as a “love story” when in fact the real story behind it was love of evil at work, a deliberate ploy to overcome the “America First” movement, brainwash Joe Public and take the nation to war.
Downunder Kim
Hi. I agree with your assessment of current facts. I disagree that the world always was this way. I don’t know about the future. Our species could be a failed experiment but there are plenty of other planets where it could be a success.
I am anti-war as a personal policy based on principles of love.
But sometime it is necessary to fight war with war and fire with fire to avoid the fate of being held prisoner for life in a maximum security jailhouse.
I am proud of Russian strength because it is standing on the firm ground of tough love in the short term.
I am a USer satrapped in a provincial moral swamp. Where’s the pride? Where’s the shame?
Russia will win this war if she can keep the high moral ground over the long term. But the en masse moral sands are shifting with quicksand patches waiting like venus traps.
Much is made of the Russian character honed over centuries by war and fine-tuned by a moral tradition. However, it seems to me that its character weakens with peace of the pax americana kind spreading the contagion of pox americana.
The US is beyond stupid trying to do what Napoleon and Hitler couldn’t with force which just forces Russians to their senses. Now it looks like Kissinger is going back to plan B with the new opening to the BIS SDR net for China and Russia gulls. I could be wrong. Maybe the devil can be beaten at his own game. It’s never happened before but hope springs eternal for the love deprived.
There’s a certain brittleness in high morality flying jets and dropping bombs. It dulls the mind and numbs the senses and when peace comes and the rush of war can’t fill the vacuum, the contagion of technomania makes deals in the hallways of patriarchs and presidents.
To make a long story short, love is lost in the shuffle of the deals and we simply can’t stop the wheels of illusion. We think this train don’t carry no gamblers anymore and that it will run forever, forgetting about those shifting sands and treacherous sink holes.
I support what you’re doing because we have to win in the short run if there’s to be a long run at all. It sounds like double-talk but it’s better than winning the war and losing the peace.
The world is not, nor it will ever be, ready for your alter ego Don Quixote and his ideal of love and truth. In our imperfect state, love manifest itself in different ways, capable of bringing peace and happiness, and also doom and destruction, e.g. love of war practised round the Potomac; of gold and greed practised round Wall Street and The City (London). Usually that duality brings conflict and hostility, even evil, but, sometimes, we can see it conflate in cinematic fashion by Hollywood when, allegedly, the director of a recent version of “Pearl Harbour” depicted it as a “love story” when in fact the real story behind it was love of evil at work, a deliberate ploy to overcome the “America First” movement, brainwash Joe Public and take the nation to war.
Downunder Kim
Hi. I agree with your assessment of current facts. I disagree that the world always was this way. I don’t know about the future. Our species could be a failed experiment but there are plenty of other planets where it could be a success.
just wanna report, that flash-player southfront uses doesn’ agree with me.
does not work for me either
firefox browser 36 with current flash update
Hi friends,
Do you use ScriptBlockers?
Best regards,
SF Team
no script blocking at all