I am not sure whether I liked what that video shows. I would like to play devil’s advocate here and ask a provocative, albeit sincere, question:
Is Russia’s current strict adhesion to international law (e.g. international treaties, UNSC resolutions, sovereignty of foreign states) a principled policy, or simply realpolitik dictated by its relative weakness in international power projection?
If current trends follow, with Russia on the rise economically, politically and militarily, and the US in relative decline, should we expect Russia to use similar methods as the US, i.e. “Russian Blackwater” contractors? Should we expect other similar policies, such as drone assassinations, regime changes, disregard for UNSC resolutions etc?
In international state affairs, is morality a concept restricted to cases of balance of power (see Thucydides’ Melian dialogue with the Athenians), condemned to collapse as power distribution becomes more skewed? Or is morality rather a cultural concept? Or is it a mix of both?
It doesn’t matter whether it is out of principles or real politiks that’ s behind Russia’s adherence to international law but what matters is that finally like a Vandame movie someone stood up for the devastating satanic machine that was crushing humanity period. Your question and the worry it carries is in the future after humanity as we know has been saved from the current onslaught initiated by the sick wild satanic west and it’s zombiefied puppet regimes. If Allah forbid Russia ever ended like what it is fighting now it will be long long after Putin’s bones have changed to dust.
I do not understand why Southfront is perpetrating this myth of Russian PMC’s.
Russia from all information I can attain does not operate for profit Private Military Contractors. There are civilian militias and state military companies in the case of the Donbas, it was Local militias augmented by private citizen volunteers from around the world and with the advise of Russian Observers. The initial conflict involved middle aged people with experience in Afghanistan and Chechnya and then after a period of time, young locals who had received training from Russia.
The main accusers of the Russian PMC use are Reuters (a Rothschild’s owned International News Corporation, of which they own both in the West, Reuters and Associated Press) and the Ukrainian Government.
One has to look at who is doing the accusing and work out their links and agendas. If, Russia is utilising PMC’s then it is a slippery slope which also would shoot down the narrative of the Russian Government in their wanting to be part of a multipolar world governed by International Law. One can easily see why this narrative is important in the information war against Russia.
I am not sure whether I liked what that video shows. I would like to play devil’s advocate here and ask a provocative, albeit sincere, question:
Is Russia’s current strict adhesion to international law (e.g. international treaties, UNSC resolutions, sovereignty of foreign states) a principled policy, or simply realpolitik dictated by its relative weakness in international power projection?
If current trends follow, with Russia on the rise economically, politically and militarily, and the US in relative decline, should we expect Russia to use similar methods as the US, i.e. “Russian Blackwater” contractors? Should we expect other similar policies, such as drone assassinations, regime changes, disregard for UNSC resolutions etc?
In international state affairs, is morality a concept restricted to cases of balance of power (see Thucydides’ Melian dialogue with the Athenians), condemned to collapse as power distribution becomes more skewed? Or is morality rather a cultural concept? Or is it a mix of both?
It doesn’t matter whether it is out of principles or real politiks that’ s behind Russia’s adherence to international law but what matters is that finally like a Vandame movie someone stood up for the devastating satanic machine that was crushing humanity period. Your question and the worry it carries is in the future after humanity as we know has been saved from the current onslaught initiated by the sick wild satanic west and it’s zombiefied puppet regimes. If Allah forbid Russia ever ended like what it is fighting now it will be long long after Putin’s bones have changed to dust.
I do not understand why Southfront is perpetrating this myth of Russian PMC’s.
Russia from all information I can attain does not operate for profit Private Military Contractors. There are civilian militias and state military companies in the case of the Donbas, it was Local militias augmented by private citizen volunteers from around the world and with the advise of Russian Observers. The initial conflict involved middle aged people with experience in Afghanistan and Chechnya and then after a period of time, young locals who had received training from Russia.
The main accusers of the Russian PMC use are Reuters (a Rothschild’s owned International News Corporation, of which they own both in the West, Reuters and Associated Press) and the Ukrainian Government.
https://informnapalm.org/en/russian-private-military-companies-myth-russian-propaganda/
http://feraljundi.com/tag/pmc-wagner/
One has to look at who is doing the accusing and work out their links and agendas. If, Russia is utilising PMC’s then it is a slippery slope which also would shoot down the narrative of the Russian Government in their wanting to be part of a multipolar world governed by International Law. One can easily see why this narrative is important in the information war against Russia.