The Moscow-Beijing Express on The Saker
By: Jeff J. Brown, 44 Days Radio Sinoland
Cross linked with 44 Days http://44days.net/?p=3099 and Sound Cloud https://soundcloud.com/44-days/slavs-the-yellow-peril-are-niggers-brutes-beasts-for-western-empire-moscow-beijing-express
Here is a visual from a 19th century British scientific journal, “proving” that the Irish descended from subhuman Negroes. Irish, Russian, Chinese: they are all niggers in the eyes of Eurangloland.
The conflicting visions between the Anti-West and Eurangloland (NATO, with Australia and New Zealand) continue unabated. China and Russia, the dynamic duo that stands tallest among the Anti-West, have been very visible recently. Russian and Chinese Presidents Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, respectively, attended China’s jaw dropping Victory Against Fascism Parade in Beijing, on September 3rd. Putin was Xi’s honored guest, as was the Russian detachment that participated in the parade. http://10.16.86.131/the-moscow-beijing-express-from-may-9th-in-moscow-to-september-3rd-in-beijing-the-anti-west-order-comes-full-circle/
Both Putin and Xi gave important speeches during the 70th anniversary session of the United Nations. Putin said all he could, without visibly spitting on the West’s name. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q13yzl6k6w0 Xi’s US state visit was just as withering for Obama and the West. http://44days.net/?p=3038 and http://44days.net/?p=3059 Both leaders left America proudly waving the Anti-West banner and continue to be heroes for the world’s Moral Majority, that 85% of humanity who is mostly dark skinned and frequently Muslim, Hindu, Christian Orthodox, Buddhist, Animist, or in the Americas and Africa, dirt poor Christians.
The Western perpetrated genocide in the Ukraine and Uncle Sam’s never ending onslaught to try to overthrow the Communist Party of China are ongoing reminders that Eurangloland’s colonial empire is very much intact and sad to say, thriving. One only needs to observe Western destabilization and/or military activities in the Americas, Africa and Asia, to swallow this bitter pill of truth: empires, with their extermination, genocide, war and economic enslavement, don’t fall overnight. All we fighters of truth and justice can do is keep flinging rocks at this 500 year-old, multi-headed Hydra, until it finally collapses from internal rot and external overreach. I’ll be 62 this year and even if I live into my eighties, I may still be writing in my dying days, about the pestilence of ongoing Western empire, instead of celebrating hopes for a new, more just and holistic cooperation among the world’s peoples, as well as dreams for the steady state use of Mother Earth’s precious natural and human resources. Only Eurangloland’s virulent racism and fascism, wrapped in the iron fist of an idealized, sanitized and mythical capitalism, stands in the way.
In my writings, I have often talked about racism as a facet of Western empire, but it has often been based on gut instinct and verifiable extermination and genocide of the Moral Majority, since Christopher Columbus first set foot in the Americas, in 1492. As Howard Zinn pointed out in his majestic book, “A People’s History of the United States”, when the natives, who Columbus first encountered, could not produce any gold to be stolen, he ordered that all of them be executed on the spot. This is rest of modern history writ large.
A book I just read really brings the West’s racism into disturbing and chilling focus. “’Exterminate All the Brutes’: One Man’s Odyssey into the Heart of Darkness and the Origins of European Genocide”, by Sven Lindqvist, really does live up to its title and subtitle. Of course, the great quote, “Exterminate all the brutes”, is a line taken from Joseph Conrad’s blistering, anti-colonial, reality-as-fiction masterpiece, “The Heart of Darkness”.
Mr. Lindqvist did a huge amount of research and reading of historical documents, to write this book, and it pays off in blood drenched spades. Yes, Adolf Hitler was an unreconstructed hater of Jews, but it was his National “Socialist” Party’s (NSP) platform and policy implementation to exterminate ten million Russians – Slavs, they were called, in order to make “elbow room” (later changed to “lebensraum”). The name “Slav” is fraught with racism. The word “slave” comes from Western Europe’s 8th century King Charlemagne using Slavs, to be worked to death in his mines. For the world’s Moral Majority, nothing about the West has changed in 1,200 years.
The justification for the NSP’s lebensraum was that Germans had the same right to stolen real estate, just like the other European colonial masters were doing across the Americas, Africa and Asia. When Hitler got elected Chancellor in 1933, there were only 250,000 Jews in Western Europe, including Germany. The biggest numbers of them were in Eastern Europe and Western Russia. Jews made up 10% of Hitler’s coveted Slavic lebensraum, but 40% of its urban populations. City folk were the ones who went to the concentration camps first, Russian or Jewish, because they were easy to round up in big numbers, being close to railway stations and good roads to transport them.
Hitler and the NSP were infatuated with Andrew Jackson’s 1830 Indian Removal Act and how it legalized the extermination of 15 million Native Americans. It simply codified what George Washington called the “necessary extirpation” of the natives, from “our settled lands”. Hitler & Co. also used America’s Indian reservations as a blueprint for Nazi concentration camps. Round them up and work them till they die. In fact, the etymological origin of the term “concentration camp” is colonial Spanish, not German.
Hitler’s and the NSP’s racist hatred of their dehumanized Slavs is graphically demonstrated by historical fact. Jews were not the first group to go to the gas chambers in Auschwitz. It was Russians. Just as the Americans made sure that white man’s Indian reservations were set up for enslavement and an early death, Russian prisoners of war perished like flies. Over three million Russians died in the camps, two million in the first year alone. Captured Russians were considered no better than the black skinned Herero and Namaqua tribes, which the Germans exterminated in today’s Namibia, in 1905 (the Germans did this in part to show that they were just as good as the British, French, Spanish, Portuguese and Americans, at large scale genocide, thus, just as deserving of lebensraum). Only 3.5% of “white” English and American prisoners of war died, but 57% of “Slav” Russians did.
The Chinese, the “Yellow Peril”, were gleefully addicted to British and American opium, in what has been called the “world’s longest running, largest global, criminal enterprise in human history”, starting in the 1840s. Franklin D. Roosevelt’s family got its wealth from helping to addict and enslave around 100 million Chinese, as did many other thousands of “civilized” white families across America and Europe. After all, the Chinese were no better than yellow niggers.
When the US lost its lucrative slave trade from Africa, after the Civil War in 1865, these upstanding businessmen and Christians simply started sailing their US flag ships to Southern China, to capture and buy one million Chinese, to sell across the Americas. This went on until 1874, when the Chinese emperor’s ceaseless diplomatic and public relations campaigns in the West finally shamed them into stopping.
It was these Chinese “coolie” slaves (from the Chinese, kuli, or “bitter strength”) who built America’s railroads out West. Those who didn’t die from starvation and mistreatment were exterminated through ethnic cleansing across the Western United States. As with Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal Act, this frenzy of bloodlust against the Yellow Peril was codified by the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act. Like Native Americans and “freed” slaves, it was open season for slaughter, and many thousands of Chinese coolies were hunted and killed like rabid dogs. There is a reason why the saying, “He doesn’t stand a Chinaman’s chance”, became so popular in 19th century America. Because it was true.
Mr. Lindqvist spells out, with scathing research, why Slavs and the Yellow Peril were (and are) considered just as subhuman as Africans, in the eyes of Western Europeans and Americans. European and American colonialists called all the different dark skinned peoples in their colonies, “niggers”, “brutes”, “kaffirs”, “beasts”, “inferior races” and “lower races” – from the Caribbean to Central-South America to Africa and Asia – Russians and Chinese included. They were classified by the West’s best scientists as something between an ape and the superior Western race. Predestined extinction of these weaker, less intelligent subhumans was simply the natural order and this “scientific theory” filled volumes of academic journals in English, French, Spanish and German.
Hitler fondly called the Japanese “honorary Aryans”. When their imperial army slaughtered 300,000 innocent Chinese women, children, aged and others, during the Nanjing Massacre, in 1937, it caused just as little outrage among Western Europeans and Americans, as all the countless genocides committed in their names and for their financial enrichment, since 1492. Which Westerners cared then and who cares today? Just look at Syria/Iraq, Palestine, the Ukraine, the Congo’s pygmies, the Amazon’s indigenous tribes and Burma’s Rohingya Muslim minority, to name a scant few. They are just the tip of the West’s ongoing, unwritten policy of genocide and extermination, either directly or by proxy. After all, as they say, niggers are just niggers.
This has troubling implications for current events and the 21st century. What is clear is that this deep seated Western racism has not gone away. It is still alive and well in the hallowed halls of power, capital and empire. Western racism is clearly expressed by Zbigniew Brzezinski, America’s foreign policy czar since the Carter administration. He sums up his genocidal philosophy, with, “Today it is infinitely easier to kill a million people than to control a million people”, and how important it is to, “Keep the barbarians killing each other”. “Barbarian” is only a slightly more socially acceptable synonym for “nigger”, and we can see his psychopathic, imperial handiwork in Afghanistan, where he created Al-Qaeda, Iraq, Syria, Libya, the Ukraine and elsewhere, not to mention the destabilization of China, via its predominately Muslim province of Xinjiang.
Westerners cannot write about their racial superiority and the perceived subhumaness of non-Westerners, like they were able to do so freely, until the 1950s. But it is still manifestly the fundamental principle that drives America’s “exceptionalism” and the West’s “shining beacon on a hill” superiority, thus legitimizing ongoing Western genocide, wars, government overthrows and economic and resource exploitation, through the “benign, invisible hand” of capitalism, across Planet Earth.
British Prime Minister Winston Churchill simply stated longstanding, Western imperial policy and popular, public sentiment, when he said, to justify the genocide of Palestinians, in order to create Israel,
“I do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly-wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place”.
For Westerners, it was true then, and is still true today. Just ask Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin.
As an Armenian I thought I was desensitized to mans cruelty but this article touched me at a very deep level.
Arius, thanks for reading. It’s really hard to accept the truth about Westerners. I’ve spent years peeling the onion and continue to do so. Jeff in Beijing.
In places the genocide is still in living memory even here in Australia.
I spent several years mustering cattle in north west Australia around 2003.
Some of the properties – grazing leases were white owned, a few owned by aboriginal communities.
One area that a mustered for a neighbouring property, the Wood River UCL (unallocated crown land) was not claimed by any aboriginal group which I found a bit surprising as even the white owned stations had aboriginal communities still living on their traditional land.
When I was mustering at Wood River, the aboriginal manager came over to the camp to see me about mustering his property. We talked for a while then he said he had to get going to get out of the wood river area before dark as there were ghosts there. It seemed a bit odd as he had a bit of a history and was scared of nothing.
A few months later when I was mustering at his property, he sat down one evening and began telling a story.
With events of the past in aboriginal story telling, the past can blend into the present and there is no differential from a year in the past to a thousand years in the past.
This story was about the aboriginal people from the Wood river area being mustered into a gorge by white property owners and stockmen and shot. Every man, women and child. Then he pointed to a young boy about 6 – 8 years old saying he was the size of the boy when this happened.
I guessed the manager was in his early sixties, so that put the massacre in the mid to late forties.
For the aboriginal people of the area in their sixties or older, this was still in living memory.
I researched it on the internet and there was no record of it. The latest recorded massacre in Australia was I think the late 20s
Wow, Peter, very powerful. Thanks for sharing.
It’s happening in America. Yesteryear it was lynchings. Now it’s getting gunned down in cold blood by the police, no questions asked. Jeff in Beijing
The last massacre was at Coniston in the Northern Territory in 1928 organised by policeman and official ” Chief Protector of Aborigines,” George William Murray.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coniston_massacre
Watch out for OCT 24 coming, some drastic acceleration of events.
Date of 2 humiliating treaties China was forced to sign, 1844 then again 1860.
I do believe it’s already on, Reason being the re-opening shot was fired Aug 11/12 2015 at Tianjin, which most people hadn’t heard of & still haven’t.
What is so significant about that–here it clearly states how the Brits were successfully repulsed at Tianjin, one of the very few humiliations for them as they pillaged the country.
Read all about it & more any place like this good enuf for a condensed version.
The Second Battle of Taku Forts (1859) took place in June 1859, a British naval force with 2,200 troops and 21 ships, under the command of Admiral Sir James Hope, sailed north from Shanghai to Tianjin with newly appointed Anglo-French envoys for the embassies in Beijing. They sailed to the mouth of the Hai River guarded by the Taku Forts near Tianjin and demanded to continue inland to Beijing. Sengge Rinchen replied that the Anglo-French envoys may land up the coast at Beitang and proceed to Beijing but refused to allow armed troops to accompany them to the Chinese capital.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Opium_War
There were many others, some labelled “conventions”, but just names.
Great historical reference. Thanks for reading. Jeff in Beijing
That is a very sad essay, and I wonder why it appears now. Maybe the answer is that this war into which Russia has entered will be the war to finally show the way to a new world. It can easily become a global war, pitting the western masters and their minions against the rest. Maybe that is what God sees moving in the minds of men. And it can easily be the catalyst for a thorough reworking of the global order of power. Israel is right next door to Syria, and there can be little doubt that Israel is the most wide open sore on the body of the human race right now, and the source of innumerable other evils. A new and general peace that begins in the middle east where our common ancestors gained their modern skills can easily be the template for the new world. We have to be optimistic, it is easy to hate the lying murdering thieves who have caused the global bleeding of the past centuries, but it is more important to see global healing. The question may be, will the war require hundreds of millions of dead and suffering, or will it only require thousands? Regardless, ultimately it will have to be won. The world of the past, with its fantasies of master races, world conquest, and all the useless suffering, and that is still with us today, cannot continue.
I hope you are right, David. Jeff in Beijing.
Hi Jeff, well this is a scathing report. Its true I suppose, although the powers of government in Euroangloland are hopefully not representative of all the inhabitants. Its been a brutal time, this history of our planet.
Have there been no faults of any one anywhere except the whites ? I suppose its true that during this time, the actually relatively short time that whites have been the ‘leaders’ there has been alot of killing going on. When the Russians become the leaders..which is coming fast now, hopefully mankind will have a breather from all this horribleness of the Teutonic age. Sad but true. The Anglo Teutonic Zionic times.
Its strange that the white race has had as its religion, the Semitic race’s history (the Old Testament) and so now, along with the whites there is a Semitic race in ‘the high places’…has it been ‘allowed’ by the whites ?..its seems almost like a retarded power, this Zionism.
Ann, genocide is universal. The Russians exterminated natives in Siberia, as they expanded East. The Han did the same as they poured out of the Yellow River Valley, and other Chinese tribes out of the Yangtze.
What is different about the West is its scope, duration and numbers slaughtered. No other civilization can even come close.
Thanks for reading, Jeff in Beijing
Jeff,
are you sure that Russians exterminated natives in Siberia? I think you are wrong. I never read about that. As far as I know, the Russians only try to convert forcibly some of the natives into Christianity, but even that was not on a large scale (therefore Buryats are for example still Tibetan Buddhists, Yakuts are still pretty much into their ancient shamanc beliefs etc.).
I would like you to clarify on this.
Anyway, thanks for the article. This part made me very angry:
” Only 3.5% of “white” English and American prisoners of war died, but 57% of “Slav” Russians did.”
I still think Germans didn’t get the revenge from the Russians that they deserved. And to this day, the most anti-Russian media in the world is German!
The US strategy is to exploit German/Japanese fears in relation to Russia/China.
Both the Germans and the Japanese harbor a subconscious fear of the Russians and Chinese respectively in the sense that they are due some kind of fully fledged revenge. Both Russia and China have gone to great lengths to communicate/hint that something like that is completely out of the question, but the US has skillfully played on those deep-seated fears. It is of course in US hegemonic interests to use Germany to keep a check on Russian power and Japan to keep a check in Chinese power.
This policy has been much easier with Japan (which has not yet regretted the crimes of its Imperial Army) but it requires far more investment in the case of Germany. Germans well realize they were the bad guys in WWII, hence all the Anglo-Zionist lackeys in the German press trying to hammer home that the “Putin regime” is undemocratic, that it is corrupt, that it is aggressive to neighbors and that it is ultimately bad for the Russian people and for Europe in general.
Moreover, the extreme urge in turning Germany to some kind of “multicultural” paradise (read: hellhole) is one more way to ensure that Germany could be better utilized in the future as a bulwark against Russia.
Unless the Germans wake up soon from their liberal comma, they are in for some very deep sh*t.
The VW “scandal” and the immigration tsunami are only the beginning of their troubles.
“The US strategy is to exploit German/Japanese fears in relation to Russia/China. ”
Since strategies are laterally inter-dynamic, perhaps wishes would be a more appropriate word.
“The VW “scandal” and the immigration tsunami are only the beginning of their troubles.”
Some see the glass as half empty, and some as half-full.
Given context instead of troubles perhaps opportunities might be more appropriate, unless the “work” of Mr. Milgram is held to be valid, and others are “just like US”.
Wend, I’ve read about Russian genocide in far Eastern Siberia on several occasions, without going back to find the references. Compared to the West, it was minuscule. All settler colonizers have a history of either absorbing or wiping out invaded tribes, the Chinese included here in China.
I would use word conquered, subdued, assimilated, not ‘exterminated’ when describing Russian dealings with aboriginal peoples. Many people died during the conquest, no doubt, but the rest were treated no worse than peasants and serfs in European part of Russia. Not to say that serfs had easy life. However, with USSR arriving to the scene, the situation has changed. In the name of social equality, USSR started opening schools, hospitals and such, in most remote areas of Siberia.
Conquered non-Russian people were integrated into Russian society. Some of them reached very high Government posts. Stalin was from Gruzia, Sevarnadze as well. Current Minister of Defense is named Shoygu, and his ancestry is Siberian. People had fair chance of becoming doctors, engineers, teachers, or keep their traditional way of life and occupation – reindeer herders for example. I never heard of a Navajo or Mohawk becoming defense minister, or, god forbid, the head of the state. Troops from India were the elite of British military, but no Indian officer raised to any higher rank (if we assume that there were Indian officers even in lower ranks, I am not sure)
Some nomadic tribes, for example the Reindeer People (Even, Evenki, Nene people , related to finish Laps), do not have permanent settlements even today. They follow herds of semi-tamed reindeer in their migrations north, south and back. I know for sure that schools had been built in more permanent camps for them, and hospitals are placed on barges which kind of follow their migrations going up and down rivers like Lena, Ob, Yenisei. In time of USSR they all worked for salary, earned vacation time, had access to high education. There are professors at Moscow and St.Peter-burg universities, teaching – ethnic customs and ethnic languages of Siberian people, themselves being Siberian people, the first generation to move to cities. Here is a book I found in Toronto Public Library System, by an English author, writing about Evenki people in north-east Siberia. One can see how they live today, how it was in USSR time, and how it was in more distant past.
The book I recently read on the topic:
The reindeer people : living with animals and spirits in Siberia by Vitebsky, Piers.
Year/Format: 2006, Book , xv, 464 p., [16] p. of plates :
Subjects:
Evenki (Asian people)–Domestic animals.
Evenki (Asian people)–Religion.
Evenki (Asian people)–Social life and customs.
Reindeer herders–Russia (Federation)–Verkhoi͡ansk Range.
Reindeer herding–Russia (Federation)–Verkhoi͡ansk Range.
Shamanism–Russia (Federation)–Verkhoi͡ansk Range.
Verkhoi͡ansk Range (Russia)–Antiquities.
Verkhoi͡ansk Range (Russia)–History.
Verkhoi͡ansk Range (Russia)–Social life and customs.
There is an episode in the book, where elderly Evenki herder tells the author how he once sat in Prague, CS, in a nice restaurant, with an engineer from Cuba, discussing German Classical Philosophy. He was on vacation in Czechoslovakia. No such thing in Anglo-german colonies and conquered lands, eh
:-p
@anonymous 8:58 Oct. 1, 2015.
Absolutely correct. The contrast is night and day between how the natives/aboriginal/’red’-Indians of Anglo-America are treated and how the siberians and other nationalities in the Russian-Empire/Soviet-Union/Russia were treated. During the cold war, As an outsider (at the age of 11) looking into Russia, I concluded that the Russians(Soviet Union) were the first “empire” where the conquerors subsidized the conquered, where the Russians took financial losses for the sake of unity and evened out economic development. Stalin of was of Georgian descent, kruschev a Ukrainian, show me the equivalent in the West in 1930s & 1980s: we can’t.
Not true. The Russians systematically attempted extermination of Siberian tribes. Elisabeth for example ordered the extermination of the Chuchki. In that case, a partial failure. It was not only in Siberia. The Circassians were killed or expelled from the Western Caucasus. Sochi was once Circassian lives. The various non Russians on the Middle Volga have never been treated as part of the Russian community. They all attempted independence in the 1990’s, less violently than the Chechens. Also consider the Poles, Tatars, Volga Germans (similar case to the native Americans who all supported the British in 1812) and the Chechens. The Russians were less successful at building an Empire. Their moral standards were usual for the time or, in the 20th Century arguably lower.
Yes, Russian killed and exiled all Chinese in Siberia after they took over. The youngest surviving boy forced into Black Dragon River at gun point by Russians died some 30 years ago, it was in Chinese newspaper .That is why today saker can claim there is (almost) no Chinese in Russia.Russian did a lot more than that when they took over the land. They did not act like a cute little cat, or a Christian Saint.
But there were very few Chinese there to begin with.Those lands were “officially” off limits for Han settlement.Though some Chinese did settle there it was always a small minority.So any expulsion would have been tiny at any time.There were though during the Empire’s days a few Chinese merchants settled in Russia.They were the ones that handled most of the “chai” trade of those times.
Define “tiny”. How can Qin government not letting Chinese settle there since it is part of China? Are you justifying atrocities commit by Russian? Why the West Europeans have returned the land they took, but not Russia?
Anon, not a very clever attempt to sow discord between Russia and China, who have settled all their border issues to their mutual satisfaction.
Because the Chinese Empire was Manchu controlled at the time.And they put the Northeast regions as a Manchu homeland.That only Manchu were allowed to settle in.Some Chinese disobeyed that.But not that many.Those areas are internal parts of Russia.Just as Tibet is an internal part of China.They are/were not “colonies” far from their shores like the Western powers had.
@The Wend and @Stavros
Yes, unfortunately, Germans and Russians regard each other as “partners of destiny” which could be rephrased as “partners of fate”, i.e. fatal partners. In the german upper class (whatever that is exacly) they definitely hate Russia and the Russians, no matter what the current wording is (like “helping our friends there to build up a civil society” [so that they can try in vain to become humans] etc. etc), while the Russian elite pleases itself for 150 years or more to see in Germany and the germs their brothers (“nobody understands us as they do”) and their ultimate saviours: Russia must be improved – but Russia can’t do it – the germans know how – thats why they must and will come… not on a bloody tank but on a white horse, touch Russia with their magic wand and Russia will become just as beautiful, mighty, rich, intelligent, and universally loved as Germany. As a german I am convulsed as well by the falsehood of that picture of what Germland is and is likely to do and is doing right now and by the obstinateness with which the russky elite – no matter of what time or creed – sticks to that ridiculous hope.
One (1) German once fulfilled these Russian hopes – Bismarck, who had lived for many years in Russia and saw an enormous potential in uniting the strenghts of both parties (very much like RU and CN now). What nobody – except me – ever paid attention to is a fact that plays a role in what is discussed here, but was not mentioned so far: “Germany” (i.e. The Holy Roman Empire of germ nationality, AD 800-1806) was always a colonial empire acquiring land and people in the East of itself, that is, in the land of the Slavs. “Österreich” (Austria) was the old “Ostmark” (frontier towards the East) in the south, and the “Mark Brandenburg” (which became later “Prussia” with Berlin developing with time as its capital) was the same in the North. The Slavs around their forteress of Brennabor (-> Brandenburg) resisted the onslaught of the western barbars and mass murderers roughly as long as Byzantium. While the Slavs “in the East” (=Wenden=Sorben=Serby=Soraby=Northern Serbs=Lusatian Serbs etc.) where germanized, something in many of them remained slavic – that’s why East Germans are on the whole much more bearable than typical, western germs. Among the conquered slavs coerced into germanness were also descendants of their former leaders, which would now find a place within the brandenburgish-prussian or pomeranian society. The Bismarcks were one of these families, and Bismarck is, unbeknownst to himself and anybody else, a typical germanized Slav, who in his guts found nothing wrong in siding with the Russians, on the contrary, if it was profitable for both sides. That’s why when he was in command, Germany (as we know it today, founded by him in the first place in 1871) “naturally” turned towards Russia… so that “naturally” intrigues were launched against Bismarck by the english, and, when finally he was chased away by kaiser boy Willy the dummy, “naturally” the whole of Restgermany was relieved and began to turn against Russia. This is the state of affairs until now (with the exception of the GDR as long as it lasted until Gorbee threw it away in hope for german gratefulness, and in the West the exception of the wonder of the few years with Willy Brandt, a boy from Lübeck, another slavic settlement), and especially under the english secret service whore Angela “Merkel”. Preventing a “new Bismarck” is since then the main obsession of the angloamerican barbars, and their constant goal in interfering with the internal affairs of their colony, Bigwesterngermany (F.R.G. = Fashistskoe Revanshistskoe G…niezdo).
And now these “elites” of the resurrected papist “holy” westgerman reich after the annexation of the GDR indeed “harbor a subconscious fear of the Russians and Chinese respectively in the sense that they are due some kind of fully fledged revenge…” – yes, but instead of “behaving well” they seem to suffer from one of these psychological counterproductivities the name of which excapes me right now, but which makes you do exactly that what you should avoid at any cost. It is not so much stupid bravery, as a fearful compulsion to “try out what happens if we do the forbidden thing”, and the driving force of this compulsion is the deep understanding that they deserved more punishment than they received, they must be *more* punished, and if doing the forbidden thing again is the key for receiving what you need from the bottom of your rotten soul… then let it be! Let’s do it! Mer’DE does it for a long time already, half of the Ukrinian build up was done by this FRG…
There are reports that 1/3 of Eastern Germans have some Slavic ancestry.The names of many Eastern Germans can sometimes show them to be Germanized Slavic family names.Though during the Hitler era there was a government campaign to change Slavic sounding names to more Germanic names.
@bimboplumpe
We must remember how the history of both Russia and Germany has been shared by common blood. First of all, the Russian Empress Catherine the Great, was of pure German stock, later on the Romanov dynasty which was the last one to rule Russia, was also of mixed Teutonic-Russian blood and Tsar Nicholas II’s wife Alexandra was of pure German stock also.
” The Han did the same as they poured out of the Yellow River Valley, and other Chinese tribes out of the Yangtze.”, That is some thing new to me since I am Chinese, and I believe I am fairly good at Chinese history. You have to have some reach to back it up, not just a MSM web site.
Chinese is a melting pot. We take in every one, any one and make them one of our own. More than 1 million Iranian sought refuge in China in the time of Tang. All those outsiders came to China, and end up been part of us.
The history suggest that we fought wars, but we seek lasting peaceful solutions with our neighbors. The relationship with Russian is more than enough to illustrated this point. Let along the famous over 2000 thousand year story of capture a leader of a southern tribe 7 time for fighting wars, and let him go 7 times after he promised no more war. He started war again any way, until after 7th time for the lasting peace. China is big melting pot. Many different people melted in one.
As someone from the USA, the thing I noticed throughout my travels in Asia, is how many small ethnic groups live throughout Southeast Asia and Southern China, and presumably elsewhere. Unlike in the USA, where there are very very few Native tribal people left and they live mostly on the fringes to which they were ethnically cleansed if not murdered.
Likewise, for all the talk about how terrible Stalin was, I also read that he tried to include minority groups, not slaughter them en mass.
So while killing is endemic in humans, it really does appear at least to me that it is the Western Europeans who really went about mass genocide for the past 500 years, taking pride in their superior civilization built on Slavery Slaughter and Stealing.
I just wonder if there is a such a thing as Karma, or reaping what one sows.
Or at a minimum, when this horror will end.
But try to talk with even relatively enlightened friends of mine, very few are willing to ‘Look into the Abyss’, and as Putin asked “What have you done?”
Jeff, I find it terribly interesting that in the examples of “Russians” and “Han” you explicitly and correctly lay the blame for these ‘genocides’ (a muddle concept to begin with) at the feet of a specific group of people. However, when it comes to the “West” you do not blame ‘genocide’ on any people, but on some vague, nebulous “West” which can be anyone you want it to be depending on what kind of mood you’re in. Why do you hold “the West” (which you never define) to a standard to which you apparently do not hold any other subject? Its almost as if you have some kind of…I don’t know….prejudice?
Maybe because the West has multiple “villains” involved (at different times).So while saying “Russians” or “Han”,only two involved (vastly different peoples ethnically,but the same two over the long period discussed).With the “West”,he would need to say,the Spanish during one period,the Portuguese during another,the Dutch during another,the English (and Scots) during another,the French during another,the Belgians during another,the Germans during another,the Italians during another,the Swedes and Danish during another.Much,much,harder than saying Russians,Han,and “the West”.
Ann said:
“When the Russians become the leaders”
why is mankind so driven by childish concepts…leaders/led?
Pathetic, is it not?
“why is mankind so driven by childish concepts…leaders/led?
Pathetic, is it not?”
Evaluation is always a function of purpose, so perhaps a wiser formulation should read – useful, is it not?
The process from “exceptionalism” to equal and different is lateral, including in regard to velocity, trajectory and reach, one of the vectors in this lateral process being childish concepts.
You either lead by example, as one must hope that China and Russia will do, or humanity is doomed, or like the Exceptionalists you ‘lead’ by force, aggression, terror and genocide. Oh, and intensive brainwashing.
“You either lead by example, as one must hope that China and Russia will do, or humanity is doomed, or like the Exceptionalists you ‘lead’ by force, aggression, terror and genocide.”
You appear to be fixated with binary logic thereby obscuring lateral options.
If the purpose is catalysing the lateral process from “exceptionalism” to equal and different with the understanding that means condition the ends, and that knowledge/motivation are function of critical interactive experience, then the way to proceed – not lead since this precludes factors outlined earlier in this sentence – is to aid catalysation of processes facilitating critical interactive experience.
However if history is viewed as catechism, and notions of primary and/or sole agency plus creations of “cults of personality” are allowed to flourish, they become obstacles to catalysing the lateral process from “exceptionalism” – a subset of which is leadership – to equal and different.
Ideology and ideological immersions are more dangerous than weapons of any destruction as illustrated by the history of the “Bolsheviks” and the Soviet Union, as is largely understood by the present representatives of the Russian Federation.
Anon, could you repeat your comment, but in English, without the incomprehensible jargon? I felt as if I was reading some sort of parody of Slavoj Zizek or some similar charlatan.
anon..you don’t like the idea of the Russians becoming the leading factor in evolution…hmm…zionist ?
“anon..you don’t like the idea of the Russians becoming the leading factor in evolution…hmm…zionist ?”
It would appear that you attempt to fill doubt with assertion even with benefit of question mark.
You also appear to believe that the “leading” opponents of the “exceptionalists” are restricted to the “Russians”, and that the “Russians” are all “leading” opponents of the “exceptionalists”.
You may be unaware that framing, in this case of a question, conditions output, often precluding development of knowledge.
You also appear to imagine that it is a valid practice to attempt to use a simple rhetorical binary, namely zionist/non-zionist in investigation of an analogue complex lateral world.
As for “evolutionary” impact: if memory serves it was the cake lady who held wide-ranging ambitions in that regard, where as the representatives of the Russian Federation were/are more measured in their strategies.
Hi Jeff,
The article exposes quite a bit of the history of racism that I do not know about. However I have this problem: while I believe it’s true that racism exists, in current era, it is mostly unconscious. To understand what I mean: I kind of believe by now many, if not most US college students are not consciously racist, and yet, you find many such people openly support what I call “active actions” for regime change. Take Syria for example, I think the Empire is able to do it’s destabilization it wants, because many Americans truly believe they are “doing good” to try to get rid of Assad. I believe this “urge to do good in foreign lands” is nuts, and my only conclusion is that it has to do with this “missionary zeal” that is somehow common and ingrained in many Westerners. If the Syrian problem is “fixed”, such “do-gooders” would then move on to the next target (like Iran, for example, then China, etc). I wonder if you agree? Some how I don’t think I am expressing myself fully correctly I believe, but perhaps this quote below from C.S. Lewis helps ?
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”
What is it in the Western education system that produces this kind of “let’s bomb them to liberate them” type belief ?
Another question I have for Jeff is this: I have quite a number of Chinese friends, they are all smart professionals, but incredibly, most of them totally buy the Western propaganda, such as US is doing good in the middle east, improving human rights etc etc. To be honest I am shocked, so since you are in China, i wonder what do most of the young Chinese there think?
Alan, if your Chinese friends are behind the Great Western Firewall, it doesn’t matter what race they are. They are still getting brainwashed by the MSM. The same is true here and everywhere else for that matter. But I always ask: who is doing the most good and who is doing the most harm? For the former, I have to go with Russia and China these days. For the latter, the West. Thanks for reading, Jeff in Beijing
alan, Western brainwashing is totalitarian. The MSM, the advertising spiritual molestation business, the ‘tittietiainment’ (tittilation plus entertainment) Moloch, all political parties etc, speak with one voice, more or less, about the central untruths of Western Civilization. That the West represents ‘humanitarianism’ and ‘morality’. That the West is ‘Christian’ ie follows the Prince of Peace, when, in fact, its is strictly old Testament/Torah faith, with its drive to genocide and vengeance and totalitarian control ‘Under God’ that reigns. That individual greed produces Heaven on Earth. That greed can grow forever on a finite planet. That the Westerner represents the end-point of human evolution, the ‘End of History’ as ‘honorary Aryan’ Fukushima claimed. All in all a compulsory mania of egotism and narcissism exists amongst those so morally deranged as to have created a God in their image, then declare that reality is the exact reverse. I realised that I lived in a world of lies at about seven, but it took years of isolation as a sort of lunatic at an elite school to comprehend the full truth. And, believe me, the Australia of that time seems a veritable paradise besides the moronic inferno that passes as ‘society’ hereabouts today. One by one every sane, decent, humane tendency, impulse or individual has been purged, ostracised or simply ignored and as far as the eye can see lie deserts of vast mediocrity, populated by malignant buffoons who fancy themselves demi-gods.
What is it in the Western education system that produces this kind of “let’s bomb them to liberate them” type belief?
I believe this “urge to do good in foreign lands” is nuts, and my only conclusion is that it has to do with this “missionary zeal” that is somehow common and ingrained in many Westerners.
I think you just answered your own question there, Alan: missionary zeal. Modern ‘humanitarian imperialism’ is the last, dying vestige of what used to be called Christianity. Nowadays, instead of articles of faith, we have ‘human rights’. Instead of heaven, we have ‘democracy’. And instead of missionaries, we have ‘non-governmental organizations’; instead of mass conversions, color-revolutions.
But the new religion, just like the old one, is still predicated on the idea that our faith is the correct one, and that other people’s political and socio-economic systems are inherently evil; and that those poor souls are always in need of ‘liberation’ and ‘consciousness raising’ to make them good little democrats–just like us!
Padraig, I realised a long time ago that in the West in which I grew up, the psychopath was not an isolated exception to the rule. I came across ‘religious’ people who were plainly psychopathic, neighbours whose behaviour was plainly psychotic, a number of ‘teachers’ who clearly hated children, fellow students who were thoroughly nasty and their parents etc, etc. Then the power structures of society were totally taken over by this type. The MSM, once tolerating some sort of range of opinion, became entirely Rightwing, the Murdoch cancer insanely so, being utterly biased, partisan and poisonous. Politics purged the eminent and decent types, left-overs from the Depression and WW2 that once dominated both sides, replacing them with Tea Party style toxic, hate-driven, imbeciles, or ‘Labor’ sell-outs, most nakedly and proudly beholden to our local Jewish Fifth Column. By psychopaths I do mean the full quid. Narcissistic, untrustworthy, bloodthirsty maniacs, without human empathy or compassion.
The mark of the times is the ubiquity and intensity of hatred. The Murdoch cancer in particular spends much time on remorseless hate and fear-mongering campaigns against numerous groups. It pursues relentless vilification campaigns against individuals who dare to get in the way, like Tim Flannery a scientist who dared to oppose the climate destabilisation denialists in power. They even pursue the long dead, eminent, historian, Manning Clarke, in the foulest manner, because his style of history doesn’t suit Rupert Murdoch’s preferences. And the popular mass, growing duller by the day, is brainwashed with talk-back hate-mongering, particularly racist and xenophobic in nature, by creatures who it would be insulting to call thugs-insulting to thugs.
Needless to say there appears no exit from this comprehensive moral, spiritual and intellectual debacle. The country remains smugly certain that we are the envy of the world, and that is that. To be alive at the precise moment when your native society chooses evil idiocy and boundless greed to base itself on is probably not that uncommon in history, but this time, with the added and unprecedented existential horror of climate destabilisation (a subject either furiously denied or insouciantly ignored)there is a definite apocalyptic feeling about things.
alan, no-one in the Western ruling elites buys the lie that the West represents a force for good in the world. That’s an idiocy for the brainwashed masses. The elite know that it is a question of domination, exploitation and hegemony, nothing else.
If anyone doubts the truth of the holocaust, the evidence is clear and documented very well at two trials in Canada http://www.whale.to/b/faurisson3.html.
The ignorance of 19th Century’s racial writings and theories is astounding .The original inhabitants of Spain , as an example ,the Celtiberians , are a mix of Celtic and Iberian peoples ,both Europeans .The Iberians migrated West from the Caucasus ,from what is now Georgia .The author of the article is correct about the plague of racist domination unleashed on the whole World after the year 1492 .(Actually it had started a few years before with the Portuguese caravels rounding the Cape of Good Hope and sailing up the Indian Ocean). But ALL eras come to a close eventually , and all of us may be witnessing the beginning of the end of what started in 1492 . Hope the next era will be better for ALL living things ,vegetal, animal and human .
Many thanks for a remarkable article, as well as a remarkable discussion, which actually helps restore some minor hope for the future in my tired brain.
I have to say that in the course of reading I felt like I was reading a history from a parallel universe, as none of this information was ever included in the “history” classes I have attended. Funny to realize how totally uneducated I am after all these years . . . the MSM is just another side to the official narrative that has written all the text books for the obedient workers as George Carlin might describe us.
Steven, thanks for reading. It took me years to realize that I had to stop referring to the MSM. Otherwise, the brainwashing is inevitable. Just stop. Turn it off.
Jeff in Beijing
Jeff,
Very powerful piece indeed. Thanks.
You could have included slaughter of north Indian population in 1857 by the British military forces after they crushed the mutiny-that-grew-into-war-of-independence.
(History shows that peoples who settled in India after around 1500 BC also killed the aboriginal tribes to the extent required for expanding their kingdoms – at the same time, there was large scale acceptance of tribal lordship of the forest & hilly areas.)
The Anglo-American (Anglo-Saxons and other Germanic groups of Europe who migrated to American continents) racists & imperialists had been treating every other ethnicity/race across the world as ‘sub-human’.
Straight-Bat
Straight Bat, Dharampal estimated that the British exterminated around 1.5 billion Indians/Burmese, etc., during it colonial rule of Southern Asia. All in a day’s work. Thanks for reading. Jeff in Beijing
Yes, the toxic racism of the Anglo-Saxons has particularly virulent among colonial settler populations of North America, Southern Africa, Australasia and of course Palestine. Of course it has not been restricted to the Anglos; France, Germany, Spain and Portugal also joined in with their own versions of Euroimperialism. White settlement was usually accompanied by the extermination and-or suppression of the indigenous population. The extermination of the plains Indians in north america and the way the British dealt with the Indian mutiny in the 19th century, as well as the Zulus and Dutch Settlers in southern Africa being examples. Prior to this was the colonization or Ireland which has been ongoing for some 800 years!
The corollary of this brutal suppression has been the systematic dehumanization of the colonized. Insulting names and attributes were given, in the case of the British: niggers, wogs coons and bog-trotters (Irish) being among the choice epithets. The term ‘wogs’ originally an acronym for ‘westernised oriental gentlemen’ referred to a class of natives who were to be trained by the British for service to the British empire, but the term soon became a generalised term of abuse.
This noxious phenomena has received attention in novels such as Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad, and also Burmese Days by George Orwell and A Passage to India by E.M.Forster. But in general terms non members of the euro-atlantic bloc still regard themselves as innately superior to outsiders. As Rudyard Kipling put it those ”lesser breeds without the law.” This type of vicious racism is the inevitable result of imperialism.
Thank you. I just wish to add to ” the Zulus and Dutch Settlers in southern Africa “, the indigenous people of South Africa: the Khoi San. These were the people enslaved, along with the Malays and Indonesians, in South Africa. After slavery was abolished, the Khoi San were paid with alcohol to do farm labour. What a wonderful way of ensuring the degeneration of that population and the continuous growth of whites.
Africana, when the victims are considered no better than animals, this is what happens. Just look at Palestine and across the planet, including the Khoi San, to see Western racism’s handiwork. Thanks for reading. Jeff in Beijing
Even nowadays the Khoi San are a forgotten people. When the world speaks of black oppression in South Africa, they only refer to Zulus and Xhosa blacks and there’s no mention (as not many people are even aware) of the indigenous race of the Xhoi San.
Africana, are the Xhoi San the same as the Hottentots? I was told they were exterminated, either by the Portuguese or the Dutch.
Another great history lesson. I had forgotten about “wogs”. Thanks. Jeff in Beijing
“Slavs and the Yellow Peril are “niggers, brutes and beasts”, in the eyes of Western Empire”
Although that is to be welcomed, the formulation “Western Empire” is too inclusive and forms a perceptual barrier to maximising lateral challenge.
Deeming others “niggers, brutes and beasts” not only encourages the hubris of the opponents but affords opportunities of more widespread lateral challenge.
This is also encouraged by the opponents’ insistence on the removal of President Assad and likely in the near future the removal of others; all of the above rendering the opponents “exceptionalist” and affording strategic opportunities even more conducive than those afforded by the Clinton administration from 1994.
It appears that some useful fools are becoming even more useful.
So what are you trying to say exactly?
I may be wrong, but the way your post comes across, you do not see who the useful fool really is.
“So what are you trying to say exactly?”
I note you reflect the opponents’ practice of trying to bridge doubt with assertion, “you do not see who the useful fool really is”, even if with benefit of conditioner “I may be wrong”.
Blogs are broadcast media with varied potential audiences and potential uses, including affording others opportunities of plausible denial.
For example
http://fortruss.blogspot.co.uk/2015/09/kerry-on-live-tv-just-publicly.html
Mr. Flores is not omniscient – none of us are – but since the other websites require what they perceive to be “identification”, the cautions re strategic components/emphases which Mr. Flores will likely understand were placed on this blog in the section discussing Mr. Putin’s speech.
The world is not exact given lateral interaction, and similarly is not “is” but developing laterally: using a metaphor from simple calculus dy/dx never equals zero.
I broadcast what I meant to broadcast.
Very insightful. While at it, Roman Proochazka’s, Abissinia Pericolo Nero (translated as the Powder Barrel) is also worth reading for a similar perspective but from a different angle.
Thanks
Thanks Pushkina, I’ll check it out. Jeff in Beijing
Thank you for this beautiful excursion into reality Jeff. No matter how hard it may seem to swallow, the truth is always soothing in the end. For your information, I ordered the book “Exterminate all the Brutes” from the Library. I am looking forward to extend my understanding in this issue.
When I read your passage about Hitler used as a as a tool to exterminate Russia, I could not help but to smile at the thought of Putin telling the world on September 28:
“In essence, we suggest that we should be guided by common values and common interests rather than ambitions. We must join efforts to address the problems that all of us are facing on the basis of international law, and create a genuinely broad international coalition against terrorism.
Similar to the anti-Hitler coalition, it could unite a broad range of forces that
are willing to resolutely resist those who just like the Nazis sow evil and hatred of
humankind.”
In essence, Putin is telling the USA that their project to destroy Russia will take the same direction as their previous attempt.
Sunlion, you will enjoy “Exterminate”. He writes it on the back of a tough journey across North Africa.
Putin has also said that about every 50 years, some country thinks it’s high time to invade Russia. NATO’s fiasco in the Ukraine is right on schedule.
Thanks for reading, Jeff in Beijing.
Excellent article. Lindqvist’s book is amazing-I read it in one sitting. There is no doubt in my mind that the leaders of the West, driven by the exterminationist and supremacist poison found in the Old Testament/Torah, are set on genocide to solve their ‘useless eater’ dilemma. Murder is sacramental for these monsters, hereditary and socialised psychopaths as they surely are. I mean, where in the annals of human Evil do you meet a creature like Madeleine Albright and her infamous utterance that the cruel deaths of 500,000 children deliberately caused by Western imposed sanctions on Iraq was a price that was ‘worth it’. And this monster is a revered figure in the USA, a ‘role model’ for a new generation of Harpies like Nudelman, Clinton and Powers.
Go, Mulga, GO! Thanks, Jeff in Beijing
Agreed, nasty piece of work, and hyphenated American (like Samantha Powerless), author Gore Vidal always called her Madeleine Notverybright!
Gore Vidal once said that Nabokov had told him that his pseudonym meant ‘One who has known sorrow’ in Russian. We’re all Gore Vidals today, alas.
I am Irish.
I would like to thank the ‘scientific’ branch of the British Empire for placing us in excellent company!!
* * *
The same mindset coined the term ‘aping their betters’ to keep the British poor ‘in their place.’
The scientific fact that they were the *same* people was not advertised.
Because that would have logically led to the conclusion that the British Establishment were ..apes.
Bet the Monkey King is laughing ;)
Eimar, my father’s side of the family is 100% Irish. I learned the truth about the Potato Famine Genocide a long time ago. Of course I had to include the Brits’ hatred of the Irish. I hear it every time I go to the UK. Racism and Anglo-Saxons are like apple pie and vanilla ice cream. They just go together. Thanks for reading. Jeff in Beiing
And it seems I forgot to offer insight of Anglo and European cultural aspect (which we “Slavs,” as Jeff in Beijing refer to us, are no part of). Those cultures have the form and facet of civility or courtousness in itself, and yes members of those societies and cultures could indeed see us “Slavs” as barbarians, savages and brutes, and they would be right. We don’t care about virtues which they hold dear. Their cultural aspect is not ours. And there is nothing offensive about it. I don’t care if some Westerner thinks of me as Balkanic savage, brute or beast. It doesn’t concern me. Do you Anglos and other Westernos care what I or my culture think of you or yours? I cannot write it here for I don’t think the comment would go through, but should someone be interested, then please express the wish and we shall find the way. I love to stretch Westernos’ minds, especially Anlo ones. It’s a great pleasure and joy of mine. And if by any chance those minds would snap or break in the process, well that would be a happy coincidence indeed. ehehehe
First off, Jeff in Beijing, this is what a word “nigger” by its definition means:
♦ the word has been used as a strongly negative term of contempt for a black person since at least the 18th century.
♦ a derogatory name for a black, African person
… so unless you can somehow put your Anglo nature into a “good use” and distort and fabricate the reality by making us Slavs and Asians into African race, you should really refrain yourself, or should I say your Western Anglo nature, from making such ignorant comment(s). And hey, even if your Anglozionist rulers think of us as savages, brutes and beasts, it doesn’t matter man! I don’t care what your rulers think of us (even if we weren’t on the war path).They are not our rulers but yours. You should care what they think of you. Or perhaps not. It is a very tiresome endevour, and not to mention very, very stupid and meaningless one — almost as your mentioned opening remark of us Slavs and Asians. Almost.
On a closing note let me offer you a friendly advice. Never in the future should you try to be historically, knowledgably or factually accurate while making ignorant remarks to make your point; you only hinder yourself thus. Now I have don’t doubt that such practice regularly “flies” in your Anglo culture, but we are not Anglos here, even if we do cummunicate in your language.
er, is it just me? somehow I think you are barking up the wrong tree?
Hi Alan, no s/he just didn’t ‘get it’ about Jeff’s post
also ‘nigger’ was a corruption of the Spanish word for black = negro from the latin root ‘niger’
cheers
Am I? Jeff is comparing us to niggers. Now we are savages, but we are intelligent savages. We are not animals. And you Westeners, how do you like being ruled by our ethnical stock? You do know that your rulers have no origins in your lands… that they are foreigners? You must have noticed behavioral difference, a rift, between yourselves. Now how is it that you so cultivated and refined have our ethnical stock as your rulers? Perhaps you have mistaken intelligence for manners? When your niggers will be able to rule your kind like our stock does, then you can compare us to them. I think Americans are getting niggerized. It is way more apt to compare yourselves with niggers than us.
Republika,
Sorry, you ARE ‘animals’, bipedal primates, to be more exact. Human ‘exceptionalism’ is just as perverse as Anglo-Teutonic racism, if not worse, as it has led us all to the brink of ecological collapse. We, all animals/plants of the planet Earth are One.
Sorry, but you missed the whole point. I am supporting Russians, Chinese and all the rest of the world’s 85% Moral Majority, who have been and continue to be victims of Western racism. Jeff in Beijing
I didn’t question your support at all.
So, you are disgusted that slavs could be put on the same feet as black people? You feel superior to “niggroes”? How is that different to the western racism the article talks about?
Maybe you are, at least on some aspects, very “westerner”.
I don’t have any problem to see black people as my equals, my brothers. I recognize the high quality and value of a lot of Great Men and Women, like Antonio Maceo (dubbed “the bronze titan”), Negro Primero, Severiano de Hérédia (mayor of Paris in the late 1800s; what, you never were told that Paris, Paris Carl! has had a “niggro” mayor, and a very efficient and popular one. You were never told? how surprising…), Zumbi and Dandara of Palmares (the first territory that broke from european rule on american continent was a Black realm which lasted longer than the USSR and that was only destroyed after a deployment of european war power greater than what they deployed in Europe; didn’t you knew that?), Toussaint Louverture, Madiba, and much others.
You may notice (or maybe not) that most of them on the list are from or linked to american continent. I’m from there, and that’s why most of the names that come first out of my mind are from that place.
And also for that, because I”m from there, is that I feel so at ease among them. Because despite I’m very white, I feel like one of them too; we eat the same bread and drank the same milk. I am infinetely more closer to orixas and yoruba religion than roman catholicism.
I have already sent you several replies, so I won’t go on a repetition course of debunking your BS.
But what I will repeat is this: Africans are not my brothers, and neither are you!!! We share nothing, have nothing in common with each other, either by blood, origins or by culture. Get that into your head!
Uh-oh,
‘Supremacist’ alert!
RS:People with a well-internalized sense of egalitarianism do not need ‘in-group/out-group’ measures of ‘worth.’
Looks like you need to work on your own ‘exceptionalist’ delusions.
“Looks like you need to work on your own ‘exceptionalist’ delusions.”
It is always a pleasure to receive more data illustrating immersion in the opponents’ ideologies and ideological practices.
In this case the use of ad hominem attacks as a technique for deflecting/not addressing issues, your apparent aversion to complexity, and notions that difference is subsumed within the binary inferior/superior with attendant allocation of benefits.
In some measure you have managed to illustrate key points in “exceptionalism”; perhaps by default rather than by design illustrating your insecurities.
Thank you.
Hitler may have called the Japanese “Honorary Aryans”, but that proud title was first conferred on them by US President Theodore Roosevelt. The more you read about Roosevelt, the less difference you see between his views and Hitler’s. And, while both were bloodthirsty warmongers, Hitler had the distinction of having fought for five long years on the Western Front – something which very few people survived.
Why is it that “Westerners” and “Whites” are almost always targeted for naughty-step treatment whilst the silence on the behaviour of others remains deafening? It’s as if there is some kind of conspiracy of silence, some kind of holy cow on the topic… oh wait…..
If you’re looking for Religious and Racial Supremacists to castigate why not mention the nice folk ruling the West and its colonies such as Ukraine today who affectionally call themselves “God’s chosen people”? They happily hate and conspire against Whites including Slavs not to mention many other people’s.
Just a thought.
PS, and to state the obvious, Far Eastern xenophobia and isn’t exactly an undiscovered secret either as the work of Unit 731 will attest to.
I think that the word “slave” was implemented not by Charlemagne, but by the Al-Andalus Arabs in Southern Spain, when then imported some Slavs as slaves (“saqaliba” is teh Arab word).
By the way, the article is very, very good: it dscribes perfectly the reasons for one thing I have found quite curious: the treating or Hungary’s Viktor Orbán as “racist”, “fascist” and that things, only because the treating of the refugee problem, whereas others as Austria’s Faymann or Mrkel have not received that threaty when they also expulsed immigrants. Of course the “barbarian way” is ony of people like Hungarians, not for “white civilized Europeans”.
The immigrantes said repetitively that the best-treating country was Serbia. But this has a problem: Serbia is an “evil axis” country, so we cannot put it as example. So the Serbian case was showed in Western media “asseptically” with no valorations.
Salam Oxandabaratz,
Word “slave” is not an Arabic word and I disagree with you. In Islam there is “Property of Right Hand” which is good property. And, “Property of Left Hand” which is bad property, such as sales of alcohol, gambling and so forth.
Islam tried to do away with slavery, and encouraged those who owned slaves, to call them property of right hand and to free them. Quran gives lots of incentives to free the Property of Right Hand,
Best regards,
Mohamed
Go figure.
In all its history Islamic “civilization” was based on slave labour; they raided all the neighbouring contries and more and more even from the beginning. They pillaged and killed and took slaves. They still do it in Africa. There are videos on yt showing how they kidnap Christian children and convert them forcefully to Islam. There are endless accounts of how badly rich Moslems treat their servants.
Are you, people, really so naive to think that the population of the countries affected by this plague in their past or present will ever believe your whitewashing ?
Your propaganda is just as crude as that of your adversaries, and just as doomed to fail, especially in this current climate where there is a brutally engineered Moslem invasion of Europe.
Now.. if you are actually something other than what you claim to be (and I mean the whole site here, moderators, commenters, no need to beat around the bush b/c you already know my opinion of it).. then you are doing a good job sowing dissension.
But if you are for real (let’s say there’s a tiny chance that you are), you are doing a very bad job of it. It’s understandable that the allies are always on the right side and the adversaries are not. But you thoroughly lack subtlety, that’s why it opens you to the suspicion of not being what you claim to be (I won’t mention all the other things).And it’s not just my opinion, I always like to ask as many people as I can.
Personally I’m just glad I didn’t get mixed up with this site more than I already did, because the reason for my presence here was to check it out and see what articles to translate in Romanian for some of your fans. I am not one of them, but translation is work, and I didn’t need to choose articles I didn’t like. However the entire atmosphere of this site is way too ambiguous (also not just my opinion), so I chose not to get involved even more with it by spreading it around with translations.
So.. you will like this comment or not, depending on who and what you are. Personally I don’t really care, because for me there’s no difference between Gog and Magog. They both like to enslave people’s bodies and minds.
By Gog and Magog, you mean Gregor and McGregor than I am with you. If not, you lost me!
Best regards,
Mohamed
“However the entire atmosphere of this site is way too ambiguous (also not just my opinion), so I chose not to get involved even more with it by spreading it around with translations.”
There are other uses, but evaluation is always a function of purpose.
However care should be taken that evaluation is not rendered a linear projection of perceived purpose.
Perhaps the link will add to the mixture.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/terminological-inexactitudes-except-from-an-etiquette-manual-for-deceit/5478959
The Bible saying “Let them without sin….” comes to mind here.The entire Roman Empire was a huge Slave society.The Greeks had slaves.And slavery only died out in most of Europe during the early middle ages.Only to be replaced by serfdom.While Romania only freed their slaves (Roma)in the middle of the 19th century.And the Europeans brought slavery,modern style (for the times) to the Americas starting in 1492.Where it wasn’t finally ended until the 1880’s.No society is “without sin” over slavery.Certainly Islamic societies were a big part of it.But so equally was Europe.Belgium’s slavery in the Congo lasted until almost WWI.The British diplomat (and Irish patriot) Sir Roger Casement exposed the horrors of that slavery and got public opinion in Europe to denounce Belgium over it.And they were forced to end it.
“Your propaganda is just as crude as that of your adversaries”
It appears you are becoming embroiled in emoting and false binaries.
Perhaps they are not advesaries, but all opponents presenting different degrees of ideological immersion within linear paradigms.
Lateral thinking may help facilitate perceptions/strategies of utility.
Apologies about Tangerine Dream et al since context and purpose are always key and my associates and I are not chasing a Field’s medal or a Nobel prize.
So I am wrong them, probably the word “saqaliba” is imported to Arabic, but I can assure you that slave trade was active in Al Andalus (like in all Europe).
Probably Islam forbids slavery, but not all the Islamic peoples’ States follow 100% the Islamic doctrine (because there are more conditions in a cncrete situation that the religion), just as not all the “Christian” States followed the Christian doctrine at the 100% (besides that the Bible or the Quran have been written with much more anticity than the after-coming “Christian” or “Islamic” States, so interpretation of the doctrine can go in all directions).
“I think that the word “slave” was implemented not by Charlemagne, but by the Al-Andalus Arabs in Southern Spain, when then imported some Slavs as slaves”
And we Slavs should be grateful otherwise we wouldn’t have known what to call ourselves . .
Similarly Germans are so named because they’re inclined to spread.
Russians because they are always rushing around.
Irish because they are full of ire . .
Actually, “maybe” the word Slave came from Slav,the jury is still out on that.But the word Slav itself is thought by historians to come from Slovo.An old Slavic word for “speak” or “words”.Meaning they spoke the common language.And then it began to be used to mean the ethnic group.Similar to how the Slavic word for others,that became the term for Germans meant “mumble”,since Slavs couldn’t understand their language and thought they mumbled their words.
You misunderstood me. I am not saying that the word “Slav” is coming from “slave”, but “slave” comes from “Slav”. Of course the word Slav existed before than the slave-trade; it comes from “slovo”, “word” (the Slavic word for “german”, “nemet”, “nem”, means “mude”).
The type of racism presented above has genuinely gone out of fashion and out of usefulness for the western “elites”.
While it was universal during the 19th and early 20th centuries it has now gone completely out of business.
What we see today is some new and far more nuanced type of racism.
It is a racism that has to do with ideology, citizenship and of course financial status.
In today’s neo-liberal world, you can be as blonde, blue-eyed and fairly skinned as you d’like, but it will not earn too many points (unless a manipulative young female) if you are poor. You are just as likely to be ridiculed, exploited, or disregarded.
One only has to look at popular culture, the mass media as well as academia in the West.
In popular culture for example, poor white Americans are extremely often presented as filthy, unhealthy, obnoxious and aggressive. Just take many horror films for example. Small-town America is very often the location of these horror films, in which strangely photogenic and multiracial groups of college students are brutally hunted down by some unwashed, yellow-teethed small-town white farming folk.
Also notice how minority characters (especially of African origin) are increasingly presented in Hollywood films as the moral compass, or the vector of intelligence or the vessel of bravery. Long-gone are the times in which black characters were just dumb bad guys or comic-relief side-kicks.
Lots can also be said about music, the overt encouragement of interracial marriage etc…
In matter of fact, one of the main reasons why the self-described “progressives” of the West (aka “limousine socialists”) hold Eastern Europe to such low esteem and in the case of Russia, outright hatred, is because that is the only part of the planet where one can encounter “unspoiled” white communities.
Since most (if not all) western economies depend to a very considerable degree to high and rising real estate prices (remember that western economies almost collapsed once real estate prices fell a few years back) the importation of people from the Third World becomes imperative. Factor also in the need for a supply of cheap labor and a pool of tax-payers to counter-balance the demographic decline, and then you get the reason for the western “elite’s” new-found love for dark-skinned people.
There are also many other issues, like the fact that controlling a population that is not homogeneous is far easier etc etc etc…
Today, imperialism works in a different way than in the past. Today the justification goes like this: “Country A, is a tyranny, hence we must bomb”. “Bringing down Tyranny B, justifies the killing of thousands and even millions of people”. “Bringing down the Autocracy of Putin, more than justifies the suffering caused by sanctions etc” “Country X is corrupt, so we must undermine and overthrow her government so we can fix later” “Country Y is poor, so we must overthrow their government so that we can teach them how to get prosperous”
Even if such statements are not universally accepted in the West (as I am sure that the overt racism of previous eras was not universally accepted) the fact is that they can readily be posited in the public sphere and provide the basis for endless debate. This demonstrates their potency.
Hence today, we have a racism that is not of the skull or the skin, but a racism of alleged superior western institutions. It’s not that the West is richer than the rest because it has been stealing them for so long, no, it’s because it has superior institutions! In fact, this was the line followed by Obama in his most recent UN speech.
Yes, I agree on this.
“Today, imperialism works in a different way than in the past. Today the justification goes like this: “Country A, is a tyranny, hence we must bomb”. “Bringing down Tyranny B, justifies the killing of thousands and even millions of people”. “Bringing down the Autocracy of Putin, more than justifies the suffering caused by sanctions etc” “Country X is corrupt, so we must undermine and overthrow her government so we can fix later” “Country Y is poor, so we must overthrow their government so that we can teach them how to get prosperous”
yes, I believe this is the current form of “racism”. It’s only racism in the sense that it comes from mostly the Anglos, with full participation of many Europeans. Personally I think it’s a form of “Tyranny of Good Intentions”. By selling it as “doing good”, with all out promotion by the Western media, many of their citizens fall for it. The worst part is that they can do it while convincing themselves it’s the “right thing” to do. I have no idea why many people are so gullible, my only conclusion is that “advertising/marketing” via MSM plus their education system or faith has something to do with it.
My only retort to people who buy this tyranny of good intentions is that the Road to Hell is often paved with Good Intentions. Apparently no one pay attention to that saying.
Quite right, Stavros. Today’s oligarchy frowns on official racism, and is ever so slightly more ‘diverse’ (tokenism, corporate diversity management), but it’s just as much of a racket as the Third Reich.
In this ‘anti-racist’ and ‘anti-fascist’ Reich, however, the oligarchy distracts people from its own crimes by bashing rednecks and ‘white trash’. It’s as if they’re saying, ‘See? We’re not racist anymore. Why, we hate those whites over there!’ In essence then, lower-class whites in most western countries are in the process of being ‘niggerized’.
It’s equality of a sort, I suppose. Soon enough, we’ll all be slaves but the 1%.
What a one dimensional diatribe. Bare in mind I am a big supporter of Putin and I disagree with western policy in the ME and regarding Russia. But your spin through history leaves out a lot of facts. Firstly, it is human nature that tribes grow and expand conquering others. You have singled out the “west” for doing this as if it is a purely western phenomenon. That’s absolute rubbish. Even you Russians conquered Checnya with it’s muslim population only a few years ago. So please don’t try to be whiter than white here, so to speak. You fail to mention the mongol invasion of Europe which reduced the population by a huge factor yet unlike Europeans left nothing of value behind, no enduring systems of law, no architectural feats etc. Communist ideology, adapted so enthusisastically in Russia and China, killed at least as many people in the 20th century as the “west” did. Are you forgetting that the “west” and Soviet Russia fought on the same side here? Was it the west who forced Stalin to murder and starve so many countless “slavs” to death? You are a good military analyst you should stick to that. You are a very amateur historian.
Let’s not exaggerate the “wickedness” of Mao or Stalin as per western so-called “historians”.
But I agree with you, there is nothing uniquely evil with the West. You have the Mongols, the Ottomans, the savagery of the indigenous Amerindians or the slavery widespread widespread in Africa long before the Europeans set a foot there.
The problem with the current West is that it has gotten too used in juicing out the rest of the world for resources and treasure and some balance on the planet has to be restored.
Only Russia & China are capable of carrying this out.
That’s all agreed. But like any empire, it’s always the elites at the top who benefit. And the “final solution” for Europeans is that we are to be made a minority in our own countries. I’m all for a multipolar world and we all treat each other as equals and sit down and express our own interests and come up with a compromise. That’s what Putin is saying right? We the ordinary Europeans are being told that while western “values” have to be spread all over the world, we Europeans are too “homogenous” and lacking “diversity”. We are to be made minorities in our own lands. Putin made very clear statements too regarding the fact that “Russia doesn’t need minorities” and that if you come to Russia you must adapt to Russian language, customs etc. All very common sense stuff. But here in Europe there is an agenda that we are responsible for all the planet’s problems. That is complete rubbish, just like this article. I would bet any money the author is a communist quisling who maintains a deep loathing of his own culture and people.
that *mao murdered [fill in the blank, [1] millions of his own people * canard has never been substantiated.
70 yrs of cia propaganda has done wonders to people’s mind. !!
hehehe
[1]
it all depends on their whimses and fancies, some time its 70m, other time its 100m, 200m , they cant seem to make up their mind ;-)
“…it is human nature that tribes grow and expand conquering others.” This is nonsense
” Even you Russians conquered Checnya with its muslim population only a few years ago…”
That would be about 180 years ago.
“… You fail to mention the mongol invasion of Europe which reduced the population by a huge factor ”
The Mongols never did invade Europe, the furthest they got was Russia. The major impact on the population came from the Black Death or bubonic plague imported via Italian trading posts in Crimea.
You are right on the Black Death (which is believed to have come from Mongol controlled areas at first).But wrong on the Mongol invasions.They never invaded “Western Europe”.But they very much invaded and destroyed much of Hungary (which includes Slovakia,Croatia,Bosnia,and Romania as well then).They also invaded and savaged Poland,laying waste to much of the land,including as far as Silesia.The population of Hungary and Poland was devastated.Hundreds of thousands reported killed outright,died from famines caused by the invasion, or taken into slavery.They didn’t repeat those invasions to that extent afterwards.But spend the next century or two continuing to torment Russia instead.
(Side note: It was that invasion which more than anything led to massive Germanic immigration to those countries.The famous or infamous (depending on which historic period you lived in) ” Drang nach Osten” which saw many thousands of Germanic settlers immigrate to settle lands in Eastern Europe that had lost their populations to the Mongol invasion.The local Kings,Lords,and Bishops,encouraged those settlers to come and work the land and recover the population levels to pre-invasion numbers.)
Am excellent article. I would only add that the ideology and the system at issue is very much that of a ruling class- equally held in contempt and treated as enemies in this system are the propertyless majority of the population.
The Empire-which for half of the past five centuries has been British- conducted war against not only the peasantry in the Celtic fringes of the British Isles but also the labouring people of England. By the 1830s the English poor-urban and rural- were living in conditions and on diets which barely sustained their shortened and blighted lives.
There is some truth in the idea that an ‘aristocracy’ of labour emerged in the imperial centres, at various times. But this was always a short lived phenomenon- as was the ‘welfare state’ -reflecting the ruling class’s need for allies. Just such an era is finally disappearing now as poverty and insecurity are being imposed upon the American and European working classes. A process made easier by the reluctance of the victims in this assault to recognise what is happening to them, and to face the unpalatable fact that, in the eyes of their rulers, they too are ‘niggers’ and savages to be exploited and kept down by propaganda, policing and exemplary violence.
The bottom line is that, by the end of the nineteenth century, the physical condition of the average English recruit was substantially worse than it has been a century earlier, a large percentage of young men were unfit for military service and there was a dramatic contrast between their condition and that of colonials.
The Empire, of which Jeff writes, has been based in the Anglo world because Britain became-by a process of geographical logic- the inevitable broker of the vast undefended wealth of the Americas which gave Europe the advantages which allowed it to make the sudden advance from being a backward and unremarkable western appendage to Eurasia to the plunderers of the world.
If there are races the one thing that is certain is that none is superior except, as was the case with Europeans in America, by virtue of their immunities to the diseases which they carried with them. Of course this is true of Eurasians generally and even truer of Africans, who had developed immunities to such diseases as yellow fever and malaria, which is why they were so prized by slavers.
The major foundation for “white racism” is the fact that for whatever mysterious and complex reasons, starting in the 1600’s and through the 1900’s it was among the peoples of Europe that there arose a development of higher mathematics as a distinct kind of language of its own, and this higher and complex mathematics enabled the feats of precision engineering which enabled the Europeans to design and build the best machines, and therefore also the best weaponry. Then something fired off in the brain synapses of many Europeans that this very recent development among them was linked to their genetics and to their race.—Like, if they, for instance, intermarried
with the less-technological peoples, they would forever lose their intellectual capacities to calculate higher mathematics, to do theoretical physics,
and to design and build rocketships, etc.—Racism is not really an exclusive phenomenon among only the white Europeans, but the power of European technology made European racism tremendously more far-reaching and influential, for everyone on the planet.
Racism, being emotionalistic, tends toward stupidity. Consider Nikola Tesla, a scientist and inventor of Serbian descent and very much Slavonic, as well as his entourage which included other talented Serbs,—and his inventions form the very foundation of most of the practical technology we use today, from electrical power to radio communications and concepts of remote control. He alone laid much of the foundation for modern technology, and thereby accomplished more than dozens of English, German, French, even American scientists and inventors. So what is the nonsense about Slavonic inferiority?—But the eminent standard of evaluation of societies and civilizations has become the white Europeans’ standard,—what level of machines are designed and built, and what level of mathematics are being calculated? If better, then white people tend to salute you. If not as good, then white people tend to hiss at you.
Note also the one of the biggest mathematical improvements and the basis for any “mathematical language”, the very idea of posiitional digits and that mind blowing concept of “zero”; that has never been invented in Europe nor by white skinned people.
But in Asia and American continent (apparently inventions completly independent but how strikingly similar; believeing people could surely see the sign of God here).
Note also that still today the mayan calendar is more accurate than our own.
The mayan writting system has the beauty, complexity and accuracy of the chinese system.
And the idea of a base 20 numeration is so well fitted to calculate in Big Numbers. Haven’t they be destroyed by barbarians that “want gold like pigs” I’m sure the first incursions out of our planet would have been thanks to the works of mayan scientists.
Stavros, you are absolutely right.
The nation-state is the biggest obstacle to the global plutocracy’s project for total dominion, best characterized in NATO’s doctrine of FSD.
It’s not that racism no longer exists, it’s just that it’s no longer as useful to maintain a perception of the inferior ‘other’ in a large underclass that traditionally provided the canon-fodder for Grand Larceny.
The nation-state has also undergone transformation internally, with class divides and widespread literacy making it much more difficult to mobilize that canon-fodder.
Instead, the plutocrats have appropriated and subverted institutions, particularly democratic government and the media. ( The rollback began in earnest in the late seventies, as collective bargaining in even the capitalist West showed a real possibility of wresting control from them.) The TTIP is meant to complete the transfer of control, using supranational bodies to blast the foundations of nation-states.
Israel is the colonial mercenary-controlled entity par excellence, and the model for re-feudalization across the globe. With bots replacing human capital, there is little or no need for the majority of human either.
What we now have is an attempted carve-up into regions. Globalization therefore is served by ‘multiculturalism’ and nationalism is tainted as ‘racism.’
The international mercenary army – used in strategic ways from faux or staged conflicts to directly as proxies are the heirs to the old European mercenary armies. But this time, their backers are collaborative rather than competitive. They know there is no more Earth, unlike the days of yore.
The real divide is class.
As the Germans say: Klasse. Thank you for a highly valuable account of history, Jeff.
Sven Lindqvist, as you might have guessed, was accordingly “rewarded” by the Swedish MSM letting loose a deluge of lies, slander, and ridicule instantly in the wake of the release of his truly monumental “Exterminate all the brutes” back in 1992. Keep in mind here that this took place a few years before the Internet became generally available and began to function as a source of alternative information. Up to the early 1990ies, the horrible Anglo-Zionist consensus reigned totally supreme, allowing no other narratives on the subject of White terror than Nazi Germany (bad) against the Jews (good) and the Anglos (super-good). Lindqvist actually broke the most holy of political taboos in Western bourgeois society, and he has my full admiration for it. Small wonder that Sweden’s pathetic BHL wannabe, self-styled “poet” Per Ahlmark, has been yelling and screaming “anti-Semitism” non-stop ever since — great fun to watch (Sweden closed down its mental hospitals 30 odd years ago).
As was mentioned above, in the 19th century you could become a distinguished “scientist” in the West spouting tripe about inferior and superior races. I remember in particular from Exterminate all the brutes that the bogus claim to science was entirely conditioned upon the very practice of wanton genocide. This, then, is the real significance of Manifest Destiny as well as War on Terror, Humanitarian Intervention and what have you.
Looking at present realities, the fascist West in its phase of terminal rot and disintegration has correctly noted that the Russians and the Chinese are indeed causing ever greater problems to it. Hence, the Western corporate media resort to the very same tactics in order to help finish off these problems as did their Swedish affiliates against Sven Lindqvist and Exterminate all the brutes. And to this end, they have a solid ideological legacy at their disposal, based on racism, imperialism, and chauvinism. But it won’t help here. Stalin and the USSR that he led already gave the lie to Western supremacist fantasies 70 years ago. Contemporary Russia and China with their current, able leaderships are beyond their waning power. I conclude by quoting the stunning assessment made by Stavros H apropos Western Russophobia (“Revanchism and russophobia: the dark undercurrents of the war in the Ukraine”) — emphasis added:
“But, to come to the point of conversation, after these very obvious ‘material’ reasons behind Western enmity towards Russia, is it fair to claim that the ‘collective western mind’ still holds a grudge against Russia for WWII???
My answer is this: ABSOLUTELY YES.
The Red Army’s victory over Euro-Fascism (it was not just Germany that was Nazi back then, it was actually most of Europe, even though the Germans were indeed the protagonists) between 1941 and 1945 fills the arrogant Western consciousness with horror and dread. Out of the world’s bloody and brutal history, the Great Patriotic War stands head and shoulders above anything else. It is special not just in the very obvious military sense in that the battles were greater and bloodier than anything before or since, but also in the sense that a relatively poor and backward country that was in ruins just 10 years before, could take on the most sophisticated, most advanced and most brutally savage Western army and defeat it. In a sense, WWII, is not just unnerving for Westerners for what did happen during it, but also in the sense that what happened before, can happen again in the future for Western imperial plans. WWII is also a source of great shame for Euro-cheerleaders. They love to present themselves as uniquely civilized and brilliant, but their conduct during WWII was more barbaric than darkest Africa.
The Anglo-powers are also deeply disturbed by WWII, for one extra reason. They full well realize that they could never have done what the Red Army did during 1941-5. They full well realize that they showed cowardice whenever it came to taking on the Nazis head on. They only attacked when they could massively outnumber the Germans on the ground, and crucially have total air superiority.
And this doesn’t have to do with percentages of the Western populations. It’s a matter of degree. The point here being that the Soviet victory of World War II haunts the collective Western psyche, so used to superiority and arrogance.”
What started this whole mess is human violence against other species. It’s still going on bigger than ever in animal slaughterhouses. Meat eating of animals with blood like ours and eyes like ours is one of the killers whereby we end up killing ourselves. Nature will not be mocked forever. We are too brainwashed to see our own self-slaughtering actions because they are disguised as virtues. We get what we deserve. It’s called justice or tough-love.
Overall, Jeff, a good article. Just two minor points:
1.) The importation of slaves into the US from abroad was made in illegal, not in 1865, but in 1807 with the Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves. Of course, the Act did not forbid the practice of slavery within the country.
2.) Regarding the phrase ‘concentration camp’, I must admit I did not know it had originated with the Spanish. I do know, however, that the first time that phrase appeared in our language was during the Boer War in South Africa, when the British rounded up Boers and forced them into camps.
The British took the idea from the Spanish in Cuba.They ran camps like that under General Weyler in the early 1890’s.The British liked the idea (go figure) and used it during the Boer War.Which is where Hitler got the idea I believe. But there are some other historical points in error.In general its a good article.Just some of the history has errors.One was the figure for Jews,Western Europe had over a million Jews before the nazis.While most of Europe’s Jews where in Eastern Europe,Western Europe had many more than 250.000.France alone had a larger population of Jews than that figure.And the Netherlands held 150,000,while Belgium had 90,000.Germany,including Austria, had about 270,000,at the time.And that was down because of Jews fleeing Hitler’s rule.
The earliest modern camp that could be called a ‘concentration’ camp, and where conditions were so bad that the inmates starved and many died of starvation, disease and neglect were during the US Civil War, where places like Fort Sumter or Andersonville were infamous. There 28% of Union prisoners died. The prisoners lived in rags and filth and were terrorised by gangs of fellow inmates. Other camps like Rock Island, and Elmira were just as bad or worse. And Union forces incarcerated civilians in camps, called ‘posts’ as was noted by Harry S. Truman in his biography, while their property was looted and houses burned. But I see elsewhere that this sort of treatment had already been meted out to the indigenous as they were expelled to make lebensraum for God’s People.
Yes,but those were prisoner of war camps.While the Spanish and British (and later nazi) camps were for civilians.That Soviet military prisoners were send to some of the nazi camps was because of the hatred of Slavs, Hitler had.He refused to accept that they were prisoners of war equal to any others.
Thank you for this powerful piece Jeff.
May I ask you a question – it really interests me – why do you put the date on the life of the empire to be 500 years? Where do you start counting and why? I wonder because others have different opinions, with some saying it is 250 years and some saying it is much longer, making the current empire a continuation of the Roman empire.
Thanks!
They wish tobe continuum of the Roman Empire, but those are only their desires and nothing else. He put the 500 yr date because that is when Venecians overtook the East Roman Empire financially, and the fall of the East Roman Empire marks the beginning of the Western era by their account, although I have no idea how the Anglos start their era by Vwenecians and not by themselves. There were some Venecian houses that fled to London and intermarried with Anglo royalty, so they probably derive their “historical account” from there. Historically though, Venecians have more in common with Persians than with the Anglos (through Etruscans).
Heart, the 500 year timeframe Jeff uses here is almost certainly a reference to the start of the Spanish/Portuguese conquest of Latin America, which began in earnest after Columbus landed in the Caribbean in 1492. European empires before that date were geographically contiguous and usually involved conquering fellow whites.
“… why do you put the date on the life of the empire to be 500 years?”
I can’t speak for Jeff but I date it from the ‘discovery’ and ‘conquest’ of America. It was this that gave Europeans an enormous jackpot in resources of every kind, which they used to build a trading empire with Asia.
It’s ownership passed from Iberia to The Netherlands and finally to Britain which, by virtue of being an island, could devote its ‘defence’ budget to building a powerful navy. And, because of its position on the sea lanes across the Atlantic, it was able to control American trade. Not until its ally and former colony took over the Empire, with British consent largely, was Britain to lose the position it established in 1763 when it was recognised as the master of North America and Bengal. That was 250 years ago.
Meant to say thanks Jeff. You pulled no punches.
I haven’t read Lindqvist, but intend to.
If you haven’t already read it, I would recommend ‘King Leopold’s Ghost’ by Adam Hochschild. A searing indictment of colonialism in general, Belgian Congo in particular.
Ps The Famine was allegedly caused by a potato blight, the staple food of the Irish peasantry.
But the country produced plenty of grain and alternative food stuffs. The blight only affected potatos.
It was because most of it was exported instead of internally distributed that millions were starved, several million to death. This helped eliminate much of the huge underclass who had begun to frighten their Anglo-Irish landlords with their numbers, increasingly sophisticated organization (‘monster meetings’, organized legal challenges to the status quo and the notorious ‘boycott – named for its first victim, Captain Boycott) .
Soup kitchens were set up but required the overwhelmingly Catholic poor to covert to Protestantism before getting any: many chose to starve. Those that did were later villified for ‘taking the soup ‘ i.e. converting.
The Famine (man-made in the Anglo rentier tradition) coincided with British transportation policy to the colonies to deal with a the fast-growing underclass in Britain itself, particularly in the South.
Huge numbers of the English, Welsh, Scottish and Irish underclass were transported to Australia on the slightest pretext, with no leniency for age or condition. Even boys as young as ten could be transported as convict labour for merely stealing a slice of bread.
I’ve always thought the ‘white’ relationship to aboriginal Australians is much more complex than the straightforwardly genocidal one of whites to Natives in America. There are a lot of stories where aboriginal Australians co-operate with the convicts or became part of escaped gangs.
Class triumphed over race in the interest of mutual gain/survival it seems.
It would certainly be interesting to hear from an Australian Aboriginal, a Native American and a Congolese African on the topic.
Thanks again for a great if wearying read (I mean the attitudes are tiresome, not the prose.)
Ps I have also noticed among the comments section at Unz Review and other American publications an obsession with bio/ psychometrics (IQ, HBD, Malthusian genetic determinism) to ‘prove’ racial ‘superiority.’ It is as if calculus is the sole arbiter of worth.
Some things never change.
@ eimar,
The ‘Magna Carta Libertatum’ only got penned onto parchment, because of a devastating disease, a harbinger of rapid death, the plague. A disease that killed indiscriminately, but the ‘plebs,’ the ‘blue collar workers,’ already living in squalor and cramped spaces, accounted for most of the deaths.
‘Freedom’ because of a ‘virus’; how utterly cynical.
But this was only the first of more such dreaded ‘invasions’ to come.
@ Jeff J. Brown,
History, in too many occasions, isn’t a crystal clear ocean, where butterfly strokes get you from one point to the next. It’s more of a methane riddled, murky swamp, where the decay of matters big and small, rules with an iron fist and where any moral motion, triggers an unstoppable row of events .
Thank you for shining a light into this unpleasant darkness.
Also, thank you for not claiming one side’s atrocities should be out of the picture or not be mentioned at all. For whatever reason, the universe prefers balance over chaos, but that doesn’t mean she can’t deal with impacts of a magnitude I can’t even fathom.
You numbers about Jews in Europe seems a bit off. See @ http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005161.
As world Jewry declared war on Germany in 1933, all Jews in Germany became [instantly] ‘involuntary combatants.’ I just wonder why none of my history teachers ever mentioned that fact. They did tell me about lampshades made out of human skin [non-Goyim, although that also wasn’t mentioned at that time], soap, shrunken heads, etc.
Nobody ever mentioned Billy Wilder being on the scene there either – link to IMDB.
Oh well, who needs reality, when fiction is so much easier to digest?
I used to believe in Aryan racial purity too until modern genetic science has demonstrated that there are no pure-blooded nations or ethnicity – all are intermixed mongrels. Even Hitler had a small fraction of American Indian genes . The so-called pure Aryans have genetic relatives all the way to the other side of the world.
However while the genetics have debunked some of the Nazi doctrines others remain valid , especially about the Judeo-Masonic NWO conspiracy.
Aryan race purity is the stupidest shit I have come across. The humans who went out of Africa look well like many of the Africans of now. The pureness comes from interbreeding with Netherlanders and other human. In fact the smarter humans errr IQ being one, is because of another human interbreeding, which Asians have more off.. Japanese being the extremist of it and also having the highest IQ. And if someone shows they are smart, all it means is they have more of these human genes.. The blue eyes and blond and red hair just means they are more Netherlanders than the rest of us. So depending on where you end up, it means you have more mongrel genes in you. You want racial purity, well those Zulu’s have more purist in their testicles than any European or Asian or anyone else. In fact the dumbest humans are the ones without any interbreeding with the animal kingdom.. So you want to be pure, you would be the dumbest one on the block as well..
Makes me just want to run off the zoo and breed with an ape or something… Actually now they just found another human species that they did not know off before.. Making that like 6 or 7 different types of humans.. Each bringing in their own set of qualifications into the mix. They do medical research in Africa for one reason only, to find pure genes and to test it out on them. They contain the least number of variations. When we find huge differences between people who live next door, the Africans have the least and are rather uniform in their genetic makeup. making it easier to test vaccinations and such on.
Hitler was an Anglo mole. Pure Aryans would be Persians, Iranians — eastern Caucasian ethnical stock. Hitler, in the manners of true Anglo thiefs and fraudsters, just took the name, the name he shares nothing with, and dragged it through the mud. But for sure there are pure blooded Caucasians, Asians and Africans. You must be a victim of serious brainwashing to think otherwise.
Pretty doubtful.All those areas have been crisscrossed for centuries by multiple ethnic peoples.Even the people we consider “Africans” from the middle of Africa all the way South are thought to be mixed with San blood.Especially when you get to South Africa,Namibia,Southern Angola and Mozambique.But even further North and throughout Southern East Africa.And today’s Iranians are a very mixed people.
I agree with those few commenters here who call the real problem a class division. Racism is an invention to disguise and further the war of the rich against the poor.
The smartest and most ruthless among our human race perpetuate this myth that we have differences great enough to argue over, to fight about, and to kill and die for.
Divide and conquer, divide and rule, divide and suppress potential rebellion. It’s an old trick and it still works, most powerfully. This very discussion is saturated by it. I see it in almost thread I read. People argue over race and nation, when there doesn’t actually have to be that kind of difference between us at all. When we argue, the dividers win – and they are dividing us for a reason.
I love the peacemaking principles of Russia in the world scene today. I admire Putin so much for his obvious understanding that players all over the world are trying to game him and his country into foolish moves. He refuses to be foolish – and then we get impatient for him to kick some ass, or do something dramatic. We want him to blame somebody and make them pay.
We could simply enjoy the silence. The lack of drama means the day is passing peacefully. What if no race is to blame, neither whites nor blacks nor shades in between? If no race is to blame, then the rulers and plunderers have lost their most effective tool.
Everything that has happened and is happening can be parsed in terms of privileged people – i.e. those with an unnatural abundance of rights – furthering their privilege by robbing fellow humans of their natural rights.
I could go on and on, but I suspect the socialist bodies of thought have described it all far better than I can. The tragedy is always the massacre of the innocents, and this is always executed by artificial privilege against the artificially disenfranchised.
Shall we argue about this?
While I agree with most of this article (a few historical points have errors).There are a couple of points need to be made.
First,its a bad idea (always) to think of the past in modern terms of thought.The people of those times thought differently than we do today (not better or worse,but different).While most of our ideas of religion,culture,morals,started in the past.The thinking and everyday interpretation of “morality” was unique to those times.Just as our’s is to us.People of the past would be shocked and horrified at much of our thinking today.Just as we are of the norms of thinking from their times.
Second,all countries and peoples,have been racist at times (some still are).The fear and suspicion of “the other” is a human trait.That has only in the last couple of centuries been began to be overcame.Historically two of the most “racist” societies were the Chinese and Japanese (and still are,at least as much as any).To the Romans,and even more the Greeks,other lighter “white” people were considered “ugly”.And blond or red hair,wasn’t thought highly of.The Germanic peoples,considered the Slavs as beneath them.And the Slavs considered non-Slavs and even different Slavs as lessor groups.The Poles considered “Rus” as all “peasants”.The Spanish hated Arabs and Berbers,even when as white skinned as themselves as “savages”.And the Arabs,considered anyone not Arab as a barbarian.The English considered the Germans as not “white”, and those they called the “Wild Irish” as total savages.The Spanish and Portuguese colonists thought of the native Americans as savages and invented a caste system based on racial “purity”.Which not to leave India out,was similar to their caste system.By the way,you’ll notice in the Indian caste system,the lower castes were also mostly the darker skinned Indians.To turn now to the US,the early English colonists considered the Scots-Irish as a lower people.Not to even mention their feelings for the Catholic Irish.But they even thought the (very white skinned)German settlers as “not white” and used to tell them “talk white” which meant English.And from what we know of Africa,the Black tribal peoples hated the “San” peoples.And killed them and took their lands before Europeans came there.So its just not accurate to single out one group as “racist”,we all are,or have been in our past.In our modern era,the worse practitioners of it have been people descended of Europeans.That is a true fact.But one group of them or the other has practiced that racism,not just on non-white peoples.But on groups of white peoples as well.The nazis of the 1930’s-1940’s weren’t murdering and oppressing non-white peoples.It was fellow white people they were attacking.And today’s nazis in Ukraine are murdering fellow white Europeans in Donbass.And sometimes being helped by jihadis in doing it.
I could go on with countless examples.But I think we should all be able to understand with these that none of us “is without sin” concerning racism.
@ UNcle Bob 1,
Q; Second,all countries and peoples,have been racist at times.
R; Even the Aboriginals?
Yes,some groups of them, I’ve read in the past, considered themselves superior to the others.The Aboriginals,like Native Americans were not one tribe.There were multiple “nations” of them depending on location in Australia.And again like Native Americans,its only with European settlement that they were “lumped” all together in World literature.While among themselves they understand the differences.Most Americans while we’ve heard the tribal names,usually think of the Native Americans together as “American Indians”.But they themselves consider themselves,Apache,Navajo,Sioux,Comanche,Cree,Cherokee,etc,etc.And before the settlements warred among themselves similar to the wars of Europeans in Europe’s early days.Again like Europe, Asia,and Africa,if the European conquest had not destroyed those early tribal states.The Americas,most likely, would have nation states today based on the different tribal peoples.Three easy examples showing that point,were the Aztec,Mayan,and Inca Empires in Latin America before the Spanish Conquest destroyed them.
Please back up your statement of “Historically two of the most “racist” societies were the Chinese…” with fact. (edited. Please do not attack other commenters with that type of language which has been removed.Mod TR
Please read up on history and stop asking for information that is common knowledge to anyone that knows the history of those countries.A simple Google request for information will bring hundreds of articles.My knowledge is based on historical research.But here are a couple of easy ones for you:
“Though racism in China is strongest against black people, there is a general relationship that determines how foreigners are seen by many people in China: The darker your skin, the more racism you will experience.”
http://www.thechinaexpat.com/racism-in-china/
“Indeed, an investigator from the United Nations Commission on Human Rights (UNCHR) said, racism against Koreans and Chinese is deeply rooted in Japan because of history and culture.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_issues_in_Japan
Anglophobia is just as pathetic as Russophobia.
….. I’m speechless. I’m 52 now and I can say is “I and countless others, have been brainwashed by the (Western) conquerors.”
History has always been one of my favorite subjects, but I have come to the conclusion that almost everything I learned in school has been a big lie, to put it mildly.
Thank you Mr. Brown for opening my eyes.
the anglo white is responsible for unbelievable injustice and greed, all the while citing race as the reason/justification. But, race is not behind this.
The root of this is the Rome version of Christianity which was designed to, and succeeded in, corrupting (inverting) Christianity. This corruption leads to the belief that the natural order of things is hierarchy – and those closer to God are superior and more powerful. (Ie. if you are powerful/wealthy then you are graced by God, and thus deserve your power/wealth. And the poor, maltreated, etc deserve their punishment.) In the corrupted version of Christianity that leads to this psychopath stroking, “God” is the flawed ego-maniac, shadow: Jehova.
What an incisive and a truthful article. I have not known many people to write so boldly about the atrocities committed by the West on the basis that they are ‘superior’. Western colonial exploitations of Asian, African and S. American nations for the profit of their ruling classes was the Christian moral norm. Cecil Rhoads provided theological justification to categorize Africans as inferior.
However, as a citizen of the US I cannot be more happier to see both Russia and China, including Iran and some S. American nations challenging in general the ‘imperial’ west and the United States in general in the international stage. However, since the US main stream media merely parrots the talking points of the Sate Dept., Americans are brainwashed into believing the idea that they are the king of the hill. It is apparent that the US is in decline and living standards of the vast majority of Americans have come down by several notches. But still they are unable to fathom the decline since their interests have been successfully diverted to reality TV, gladiator sports, ie. football, wrestling, etc., a six pack and McDonalds burgers via marketing, and made to believe they have the highest living standard in the word compared to Ethiopia, Bangladesh, Nepal, and the like, but not Finland, Denmark, Sweden, or Canada.
Just grabbed Lindqvist’s book off the shelf and looked up the very paragraph that was found particularly outrageous by the arrogant coterie passing for Sweden’s, ahem, “intellectual community”. It begins as follows (English translation mine; apologies for any ‘clumsy’ phraseology) :
ON TO ZINDER
=============
(155)
The Nazis’ murder of the Jews, like any other historical episode, regardless of its einzigartig characteristics, must be seen in a proper historical context. No one has done so more eloquently and perceptively than Arno J Mayer in Why did the heavens not darken. The ‘final solution’ in history (1988).
Yet there is a huge gap in his book. In his search for historical events resembling the mass murder of Jews during the Second World War, Mayer goes all the way back to the horrors of the Thirty Years’ War; specifically the storming of Magdeburg on May 10th 1631 where 30000 people — men, women, and children — were murdered. He even invokes the Crusaders’ carnage in Mainz in 1096 killing 1100 innocent people.
Nowhere however is there any mention of the European slave trade with its forceful displacement of 15 million black people between the continents, possibly killing just as many in the process. Neither the European colonial wars of the 19th and 20th centuries, nor the punitive expeditions have been worth mentioning. Mayer, had he bothered to glance even the slightest in this direction, would have ended up discovering so many examples of brutal extermination, based on outright racist convictions, that the Thirty Years’ War and the Crusades appear to be unnecessarily dated choices.
============================
Needless to say, Mayer’s omissions are no accident. It’s applied Anglo-Zionism, pure and simple. Actually, Mayer could have made a very valid point out of the Crusaders — they gave the Muslim world a very foul and ugly foretaste of ‘European values’ that were to turn the entire planet into an utter hellhole 400 years later. But doing so would have been utterly incompatible with the AZ agenda. Of course the Swedish flunkeys identified Lindqvist’s blatant heresy on the spot.
Dick Gregory used the phrase “Nazis on steroids” in identifying the USA’s post WWII views on ethnicity. But it’s a description that I would use for the the U.S. government’s treatment of its relations with the Russian government and its people e.g. extradition from third countries of Russian citizens.
During South African Second Boer War, Serbian public and newspapers were disgusted with the behavior of British army against Boers, genocide against local Boers. After that a young English journalist named Winston Churchill started to write newspaper articles full of hatred against Serbian people. When the war ended Churchill went back to England via Belgrade. Young Serbian lieutenant Vojislav Tankosić found him at Belgrade railway station, slaped him several times to teach him a lesson and told him that he shall lose his life if he dares to write badly about Serbs again. That’s probably the reason why Churchill hated Serbs so much.
For Serbian readers:
http://www.fsksrb.ru/fond-strateske-kulture/autorski-tekstovi/molitva-za-one-zalutale/
Does anyone here know an exact and reliable reference (!) to the statement attributed to Winston Churchill in the next to the last paragraph in the above article?
Thank you in advance.
“I do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place.”
To the Peel Commission (1937) on a Jewish Homeland in Palestine.
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Winston_Churchill
@ Uncle Bob 1
Thank you.
Japanese should know they can’t compare with Evenkis from a Russians’ point of view. Evenkis are Northern Eastern Chinese, or Mongolians joined with Siberians!!! They already mixed in with Siberian Russians!!! How can Slavs compare with Evenkis? Slavs are only ancestors to Russians, but that doesn’t mean Russians look like Slavs!!!
I learned interesting things in this article, but as always I am troubled by incorrect assignment of evil. West versus east. To your credit, you do not divide “white“ and “people of color.“ However, leaving out the massive amount of evil done by some of your victim groups makes them look like innocent victims. Anytime we try to look at the world through the wrong prism, we can get wrong and dangerous results. Evil resides in the human heart. Few of us know what we are really capable of under duress. The Chinese were not benevolent toward their people. The First Peoples did not all sit around assuming the native American version of come kum ba ya , many were attacking and murdering one another. The war-mongering, piratical and the slave trading activities of a certain world religion Never sees the light of the news. None of them are “western.” Evil is everywhere, and promoting the idea of “the evil west” – It invites the naturally evil, vengeful, angry, covetous, etc. to more evil. Knowingly or unknowingly, you are participating in Marxist cultural change by inciting cultural conflict By pitting two groups against one another.
Nor do slaves have to come from far away. They just have to be different, a Dreaded Other. In Protestant England, Caucasian Irish were Catholic and that was all that was needed. King James VI declared in his Proclamation of 1625 that Irish prisoners were to kidnapped and sold to English colonialists in the Caribbean. The first batch of West Indian Irish slaves numbered 30,000.