Clean up Homs ,Damascus and the Lebanese border , then head for Idlib, the Turks are already covering the North . Once that is completed then head for the River.
create a wide ranging security apparatus in Aleppo and cut off the throats of any takfiri or rebel around. Just like in chechenya and it must last several years.
Second divide forces between idlib and palmyra. And if the rats blast off any ancient monuments in Palmyra then there is no reason not to level them to dusty ground.
Not only the rebel rats but also the West can understand only one language:
the barrel of a gun.
And, oh yes, good old diplomacy then comes next.
Painfully *naive*. So the assassination was supposed to work ‘against’ the Russia/Turkey/Iran alliance? Right, because anyone with even one working braincell thought that would be the outcome? The obvious outcome of such an act of terror was always going to be the exact *opposite*.
So the reason for the assassination, which was bound to force enemies of Russia to express their sympathy and condolences- making the sheeple just a little more Russian friendly- has to be something else altogether. Southfront should stick to reporting *facts*, not highly suspicious *speculation*.
No, the assassination, and the Berlin truck attack, are part of a “Strategy of Tension”- an attempt to convince the sheeple that this is a period of ‘grand’ terror, where outrageous acts can happen at any time to any person. In the midst of this period, the intention is to remove Trump from the chessboard. Then the demons can get back on track- something which remains *impossible* with Trump in power.
I’ve said this repeatedly now. They are planning a 9/11 style ‘spectacular’ to take out Trump, which will be blamed on Isis. Even the fall of Palmyra is part of this plot, since it shows the ‘magic’ Isis planners can even defeat the great Russian Empire with ease. Now we know in reality Palmyra fell yet again cos naive Putin insisted in trusting the West again in Russia, allowing UK and US special forces to oversee an operation against a standard Syrian defense that the Russians refused to properly assist. Palmyra was like Georgia in reverse, where the British and American proxies (well armed with perfect intelligence and agents embedded amongst the defenders of Palmyra) easily swarmed over a very low morale defending army.
But to almost everyone watching, Palmyra looks like a proof of ‘islamic terrorist’ planning and execution- essential if an ‘islamic terrorist’ excuse is to be sold to the sheeple when 9/11 mark II takes out Trump in the USA.
Remember, Tony Blair’s *official* conspiracy theory of 9/11 states Osama bin Laden “in a cave” masterminded the whole project, and people who accuse the US government of involvement are “loonies” cos everyone knows the US government is so incompetent, it couldn’t even ties its own shoelaces let alone plan such a false-flag. Yes, the sheeple actually swallow hook-line-and-sinker that a bunch of ‘savages’ in a cave are more resourceful than the most powerful, industrialised, scientific, military Empire in Human History, by *definition*. The first ‘argument’ on ‘debunking’ sites is that no force in the West had the resources or intellect to plan and execute the false-flag, when bin Laden did – and how unthinkably idiotic is that very successful illogical nonsense.
So again why does Southfront promote the total rubbish that anyone would ever have considered the assassination a successful method of striking against Russia, or Russia alliances, when it was perfectly plain it could only ever achieve the exact *opposite*? Even Isis commanders too far down to know who really pulls the strings, and why, could never be that naive.
I like your analysis, and I’ll keep it in mind moving forward. What you describe could well be the thinking of the planners of these activities, but their hold on the narrative has been slipping badly for them lately, and they’ve shown themselves unaware of this, so I think even a 9/11-scale event could backfire drastically for them.
The difference with this strategy of tension and others in the past is that vastly more people are awake to the realities underlying the official media story lines than in earlier times. There is an emerging school of thought suggesting that we’re right in the moment of a tipping point for the “alternative” narrative to overpower the official narrative.
In such a case, the so-called “sheeple” become ever less such a thing, even if they ever were – which I personally have never accepted as an accurate or useful description of a propagandized populace.
The activities continue as always in the field of violence, false flag and terror, but the war itself is being fought – and will be won or lost – at the information level.
The video speaker said that the timing of the assassination “clearly shows that some powers … see this [cooperation] as a clear threat to their interests in the Middle East.” I find that very accurate. She doesn’t say what you’re trying to make her say, that it was “a successful method of striking against Russia, or Russia alliances”.
I read the assassination as a false flag attack staged by Uncle Sam. It goes to show that bad things may happen if you counteract Uncle Sam. Just like the 3/24/15 terror attack on GermanWings 9525 (dressed as “pilot suicide”) to punish Merkel for travelling to Moscow without Usanian consent. Or the Halloween 2015 terror attack on Kogalymavia. Or the 3/19/16 terror attack on FlyDubai in Rostov/Don. Or the 11/24/15 Sukhoi 24M shootdown and subsequent killing of the crew in Syria. Or the many terror attacks in Turkey.
Does terror work? It does against folks like Merkel, but it won’t work against Russia. Yet it does hurt. And sends a signal to all officials world wide what may happen. This is the way gangsters work. This is the way Uncle Sam operates. Sure it is designed to intimidate people. How do you reply to that? By resorting to the same gangster methods? As Putin said, it’s a provocation. How to respond? Not easy.
There are two types of “civilians” these zionazi bum bandits are interested in “helping”. Those who can be used to “harvest” human organs from for the zionazi oligarchy, and those who they can later use to attack the states not their colonies. The rest are deplorables fit for extermination in their eyes.
Shortening front lines of course. Pocket after pocket should be eliminate because surrounding these sieges hog lots of military forces. After that concentration of forces will be logical next step. Does Syrian, Iranian and Russian forces have any idea to make surprise offensive?
Clean up Homs ,Damascus and the Lebanese border , then head for Idlib, the Turks are already covering the North . Once that is completed then head for the River.
create a wide ranging security apparatus in Aleppo and cut off the throats of any takfiri or rebel around. Just like in chechenya and it must last several years.
Second divide forces between idlib and palmyra. And if the rats blast off any ancient monuments in Palmyra then there is no reason not to level them to dusty ground.
Not only the rebel rats but also the West can understand only one language:
the barrel of a gun.
And, oh yes, good old diplomacy then comes next.
Painfully *naive*. So the assassination was supposed to work ‘against’ the Russia/Turkey/Iran alliance? Right, because anyone with even one working braincell thought that would be the outcome? The obvious outcome of such an act of terror was always going to be the exact *opposite*.
So the reason for the assassination, which was bound to force enemies of Russia to express their sympathy and condolences- making the sheeple just a little more Russian friendly- has to be something else altogether. Southfront should stick to reporting *facts*, not highly suspicious *speculation*.
No, the assassination, and the Berlin truck attack, are part of a “Strategy of Tension”- an attempt to convince the sheeple that this is a period of ‘grand’ terror, where outrageous acts can happen at any time to any person. In the midst of this period, the intention is to remove Trump from the chessboard. Then the demons can get back on track- something which remains *impossible* with Trump in power.
I’ve said this repeatedly now. They are planning a 9/11 style ‘spectacular’ to take out Trump, which will be blamed on Isis. Even the fall of Palmyra is part of this plot, since it shows the ‘magic’ Isis planners can even defeat the great Russian Empire with ease. Now we know in reality Palmyra fell yet again cos naive Putin insisted in trusting the West again in Russia, allowing UK and US special forces to oversee an operation against a standard Syrian defense that the Russians refused to properly assist. Palmyra was like Georgia in reverse, where the British and American proxies (well armed with perfect intelligence and agents embedded amongst the defenders of Palmyra) easily swarmed over a very low morale defending army.
But to almost everyone watching, Palmyra looks like a proof of ‘islamic terrorist’ planning and execution- essential if an ‘islamic terrorist’ excuse is to be sold to the sheeple when 9/11 mark II takes out Trump in the USA.
Remember, Tony Blair’s *official* conspiracy theory of 9/11 states Osama bin Laden “in a cave” masterminded the whole project, and people who accuse the US government of involvement are “loonies” cos everyone knows the US government is so incompetent, it couldn’t even ties its own shoelaces let alone plan such a false-flag. Yes, the sheeple actually swallow hook-line-and-sinker that a bunch of ‘savages’ in a cave are more resourceful than the most powerful, industrialised, scientific, military Empire in Human History, by *definition*. The first ‘argument’ on ‘debunking’ sites is that no force in the West had the resources or intellect to plan and execute the false-flag, when bin Laden did – and how unthinkably idiotic is that very successful illogical nonsense.
So again why does Southfront promote the total rubbish that anyone would ever have considered the assassination a successful method of striking against Russia, or Russia alliances, when it was perfectly plain it could only ever achieve the exact *opposite*? Even Isis commanders too far down to know who really pulls the strings, and why, could never be that naive.
I like your analysis, and I’ll keep it in mind moving forward. What you describe could well be the thinking of the planners of these activities, but their hold on the narrative has been slipping badly for them lately, and they’ve shown themselves unaware of this, so I think even a 9/11-scale event could backfire drastically for them.
The difference with this strategy of tension and others in the past is that vastly more people are awake to the realities underlying the official media story lines than in earlier times. There is an emerging school of thought suggesting that we’re right in the moment of a tipping point for the “alternative” narrative to overpower the official narrative.
In such a case, the so-called “sheeple” become ever less such a thing, even if they ever were – which I personally have never accepted as an accurate or useful description of a propagandized populace.
The activities continue as always in the field of violence, false flag and terror, but the war itself is being fought – and will be won or lost – at the information level.
My 2 cents.
I disagree with this comment.
The video speaker said that the timing of the assassination “clearly shows that some powers … see this [cooperation] as a clear threat to their interests in the Middle East.” I find that very accurate. She doesn’t say what you’re trying to make her say, that it was “a successful method of striking against Russia, or Russia alliances”.
I read the assassination as a false flag attack staged by Uncle Sam. It goes to show that bad things may happen if you counteract Uncle Sam. Just like the 3/24/15 terror attack on GermanWings 9525 (dressed as “pilot suicide”) to punish Merkel for travelling to Moscow without Usanian consent. Or the Halloween 2015 terror attack on Kogalymavia. Or the 3/19/16 terror attack on FlyDubai in Rostov/Don. Or the 11/24/15 Sukhoi 24M shootdown and subsequent killing of the crew in Syria. Or the many terror attacks in Turkey.
Does terror work? It does against folks like Merkel, but it won’t work against Russia. Yet it does hurt. And sends a signal to all officials world wide what may happen. This is the way gangsters work. This is the way Uncle Sam operates. Sure it is designed to intimidate people. How do you reply to that? By resorting to the same gangster methods? As Putin said, it’s a provocation. How to respond? Not easy.
Explosion disrupts Christmas celebrations in Aleppo
https://www.rt.com/news/371042-explosion-christmas-celebrations-aleppo/
Fortunately nobody was injured.
Meanwhile, the subhuman masterminds of this terrorist nightmare offer “to help”.
https://www.rt.com/news/371067-israel-aleppo-wounded-civilians/
There are two types of “civilians” these zionazi bum bandits are interested in “helping”. Those who can be used to “harvest” human organs from for the zionazi oligarchy, and those who they can later use to attack the states not their colonies. The rest are deplorables fit for extermination in their eyes.
Shortening front lines of course. Pocket after pocket should be eliminate because surrounding these sieges hog lots of military forces. After that concentration of forces will be logical next step. Does Syrian, Iranian and Russian forces have any idea to make surprise offensive?