Thanks, SF. I hope the diplomats will not trust the liars once again. Fool me the nth time in playing the “Let us talk to gain time” waltz is getting stale and leaving a bloody trail that makes Wounded Knee pale in comparison. I’m out of my field somewhere in left field but I wanted to show my support in this war of valiant struggle, pain and shame.
I want to say something about Mosul. The evil plan is appearantly to move terrorists out of Mosul into Syria, so that USA can bomb the city and claim victory.
Some commenters on the internet has said that it is good, because SAA can then mow them down.
Thing is, the terrorists will not travel alone, they will force thousands of civilians to move too, so that they can mingle together, some analysts talk about up to one million civilians are expected to “flee” Mosul and go to Syria. In case they go by “free will”, they have been informed by US agents that they will be protected, and can safely enter Syria.
In this scenario, Syria/Russia have the choice of either letting the terrorists invade Deir Ezzor and Palmyra, or to bomb all of them, civilians mixed with terrorists, and then endure the hatred of the world for massacrating civilians.
This is the plan. Nobody will mention the US bombing of Mosul in order to scare the civilians to flee. We all know that the stragegy US uses to “liberate” cities is to bomb them into rubble. (What was the name of that city in Iraq that was 90% destroyed a couple of months ago, when US “liberated” it?)
Why did they destroy the bridges east of Deir Ezzor? To prevent civilians to move westward into areas where the government can protect them. The scenario that is planned is to keep up to a million civilians east of the destroyed bridges, which will keep ISIS protected so that they can get a foothold in Eastern Syria, leaving SAA and Russia to just watch (or bomb everyone).
The only thing that can keep this scenario from happening is that the people in Mosul stay in Mosul. It might require some sort of miracle, getting the people there to somehow or other realise that they are safer there than fleeing together with the terrorists. If they stay, and US will bomb the city, US will be exposed. Hopefully, if enough people stay (and even better, rise up against ISIS) the US bombing might be postponed, or not happening at all.
Just the other day was a report that 20 “rebell” leaders, that wanted to lay down arms, were killed by ISIS. Maybe the spirit of defying ISIS can spread in the city.
Thanks, SF. I hope the diplomats will not trust the liars once again. Fool me the nth time in playing the “Let us talk to gain time” waltz is getting stale and leaving a bloody trail that makes Wounded Knee pale in comparison. I’m out of my field somewhere in left field but I wanted to show my support in this war of valiant struggle, pain and shame.
I want to say something about Mosul. The evil plan is appearantly to move terrorists out of Mosul into Syria, so that USA can bomb the city and claim victory.
Some commenters on the internet has said that it is good, because SAA can then mow them down.
Thing is, the terrorists will not travel alone, they will force thousands of civilians to move too, so that they can mingle together, some analysts talk about up to one million civilians are expected to “flee” Mosul and go to Syria. In case they go by “free will”, they have been informed by US agents that they will be protected, and can safely enter Syria.
In this scenario, Syria/Russia have the choice of either letting the terrorists invade Deir Ezzor and Palmyra, or to bomb all of them, civilians mixed with terrorists, and then endure the hatred of the world for massacrating civilians.
This is the plan. Nobody will mention the US bombing of Mosul in order to scare the civilians to flee. We all know that the stragegy US uses to “liberate” cities is to bomb them into rubble. (What was the name of that city in Iraq that was 90% destroyed a couple of months ago, when US “liberated” it?)
Why did they destroy the bridges east of Deir Ezzor? To prevent civilians to move westward into areas where the government can protect them. The scenario that is planned is to keep up to a million civilians east of the destroyed bridges, which will keep ISIS protected so that they can get a foothold in Eastern Syria, leaving SAA and Russia to just watch (or bomb everyone).
The only thing that can keep this scenario from happening is that the people in Mosul stay in Mosul. It might require some sort of miracle, getting the people there to somehow or other realise that they are safer there than fleeing together with the terrorists. If they stay, and US will bomb the city, US will be exposed. Hopefully, if enough people stay (and even better, rise up against ISIS) the US bombing might be postponed, or not happening at all.
Just the other day was a report that 20 “rebell” leaders, that wanted to lay down arms, were killed by ISIS. Maybe the spirit of defying ISIS can spread in the city.