Thanks guys!! (Saker return message)

First he is not allowed to use some certain words on HIS BLOG. Next he won’t be allowed to call Obama an arse hole (that’s what he is). Then he won’t be allowed to call out the AngloZionists. Next he won’t be allowed to be who he is (one if the best political and military analysts in the world).

Watch out Saker! It’s a color revolution! They are trying to hijack your blog lol.

Jokes apart though, if you want to campaign for all women, you should go to the UN or Washington. The Saker does not ‘have the power to give human rights ;).

Feminists are needed in Saudi Arabia so I will advice all those fighting for equality (let’s use the word equality and act like we don’t know this is pure trolling) to go there and do it how they do it in France.

Cheers.

The fact that Katherine perhaps have exaggerated in her complaint about the use of the word “guys” directed towards a mixed comentariat ( although overwhelmingly male and elderly ) has nothing to do with that some men and some women here take advantage of that the “Pissuerga River passes through Valladolid” to flog Feminism once again.

I have already expressed my opinion above, according to the respectful view of Mod. PS.
Now, first of all, I will clarify that I do not militate in any feminist party, though, maybe I should do, because the injustices and abuses carried out against women, are visible to me as to any woman who had not lost their innate instincts, and my own lifestyle, the principles that guide me, are clearly feminist ( what choice have a woman who claims to be she herself today ), but have always withdrawn me to do it some attitudes, which, as occurs in all groups, feminist or not, I consider excessive, even of excessive aggression toward men, because, let’s face it, not all men are equal and therefore I refuse to lump them all in the same bag. There are alos some good and righteous men who feel better and are happy seeing us being ourselves and willing to deploy all our abilities and enjoying all the freedoms which, as human beings, are inherent to us, you just have to find them, though, I fear, of these men, there is not enough for all of us and, therefore, somewomen will have to develop their life in solitude.

That, this, condemn Feminism at every opportunity, was done by some men, simply I do not wonder, because when one enjoys extensive privileges forbidden to other groups / sectors of the population, it is a difficult act of honesty, humanity and generosity being able to recognize that this is so and being willing to lose some privilege just to have a more just society and, therefore, a more humane and decent a world.
However, that some women do this, only talk about how lost they are of themselves, their selfishness, ingratitude and meanness. Because, let´s be honest, to Feminism owe we women not being relegated to the kitchen and the walls of our own home, being considered as whole people, adult, and therefore creditors to have a voice in decisions that affect countries in which we live or homes we habit, or having freedom of movement, without a man´s (father or husband) authorization.

But then, with this happens the same as with Capitalism, that those who are among the lucky ones, enjoying all, or some, of the privileges, and are not affected by the evils inherent in both, the currently totally discredit economic system in freefall as well as the system of patriarchal social organization, simply, the problems suffered by isolated or sufficiently broad layers of population simply give them a damn.

In line with this, and although it is an analysis of some of the causes of the bad results Unidos Podemos had in the recent Spanish elections, I leave link to an excellent article by Lidia Falcon, feminist and communist, sufficiently representative of a fair and consistent militant Feminism, without exaggerations, dramatizations, or stridency. I will translate some statements which, although referred to that Spanish electoral process, are extrapolated to the sad reality anywhere in the world:

“The truth is always revolutionary. Contempt for feminism from Unidos Podemos”

https://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=214066

“The cause of the formation Unidos Podemos has not obtained the expected votes is being attributed, by all commentators and various experts, to various factors: from the psychological and mediatical features of the protagonists to the international convulsions produced with the triumph of Brexit . But what is not even mentioned is the absence of proposals that would benefit women, or that the cadent issues that Feminism is defending several decades is ignored. Like fifty years ago.

I guess the “wise” -all I read are men- will think -if it is that some of them read me- what nonsense, one more of mine, to believe that the issue of women have importance in an election and much less that it can attract votes. Because these gentlemen, politicians and commentators, they have not yet learned that women won the right to vote in 1931 and worth to lure it because we constitute 52% of the electorate.

I continually repeated to one and the others, in recent years, that, if you do not have the human sensitivity to grieve for the misfortunes that afflict women, if they have never assimilated Feminism, at least to act on electoral selfishness.

The grueling campaign of Unidos Podemos has shown that the criterion of the leaders of the formations that compose it was that the unsolved problems of women since -some decades ago as equal pay denounced during the last 220 years- had no importance, not enough to give them prominence in their programs or in their rallies and public appearances. And not only men who show themselves as absolute protagonists of the formation accompanied sometimes by a chorus of good looking girls always silent, but from those who ever speak, they never do or as feminists or on behalf of women. (…)

(…) It has designed a male campaign without participation of feminists neitherin the lists nor in acts, and where the most glaring issues, as committed femicide every two days, have consumed eight seconds of the precious time of Pablo Iglesias in the most important televised debate, in which offered the joke of housing solutions – I.e. the battered get into a room while the assailant wanders freely. It was a televised debate conceived by men, developed by men and directed to men. (…)

(…) Similarly none of the women who participated in the campaign have had feminist sensibility. Let alone the shadowing debate at four of those who went to Antena3, imitating the discussion of men but yes, only among women. Soon they will make another one between black men and then another one between black women.

The wage gap, even greater in the case of pensions, the slaves who work with her husband in agriculture without wage fro him reaching to earn his salary, hotels cleaner women, women cultivators of banana raped by the foreman, housewives without salary or retirement, marginalized professionals working as telephone operators, have no space in the complaints of our politicians.

But violence, apart from beatings, sexual abuse, harassment at work, femicide, is delivering the custody of daughters and sons to their abusive parents, through depraved infamy as SAP or erotomanías that are not supported by any scientific organization, and yes in the Spanish courts. Women suffering this patriarchal judicial violence for year ares too many, and they are electorate. The candidacy of Unidos Podemos has not said anything about it to this electorate.

As has not said anything about the savage violence that is prostitution, abolitionist Alberto Garzón spoke without specifying measures, while Pablo Iglesias in the SER ( radio channel ) intimated that there were women who do want to prostitute themselfves, Ada Colau plans its legalization, and Manuela Carmena has no opinion to this respect. They have been able to win prostituyent electorate, not chase it away, but have broken Human Rights, and have trodden sex education in a country where desire and pleasure must be reciprocal and not make people a commodify. With their silence they have left women mired in a life of nightmare in a country that is the first in Europe in the ranking of prostitution.

Neither the women’s electorate can be satisfied when having achieved that Izquierda Unida in its program does not accept the “surrogate parenting”, ie: surrogacy, which carry dangerous manipulation like the bombing of commodified female bodies hormonally, a risky pregnancy and an intolerable lack of control over the fate of babies, unlike adoption, only by a genetic narcissism that is absurd and is illegal in our country. Because the candidacy Unidos Podemos has not even made mention of this serious exploitation of poor women.

The members of the Feminist Party who took decades defending the rights of half the population have not had participation in the coalition talks or the design of the campaign and on election lists or important events. And the results have happened invoice..

But these arguments have no role in the analysis they will do in the coming days the lords leaders of the candidacy.”

As an International Analyst in a program on Hezbollah said, ( on which I left a comment on the Moveable Feast Cafe del 06/28/16) “without Hezbollah, the world would be a much more unjust world”, and I fear that, without Feminism , as well.