by Peter Koenig
The ECB has just launched – effective 4 November 2014 – a new watchdog to control and regulate the European banking system. It is called the Single Supervisory Mechanism – SSM. It is supposed to monitor and reign in European banks that do not ‘behave’ in terms of overstretching their investment and risk lending as compared to their capital base.
In fact, the SSM is one pillar of the three pillar ‘security’ system put in place by the ECB and the European Commission – EC.
The Single Resolution Mechanism – SRM – is ECB’s strong arm to save or liquidate ‘troubled’ banks. In other words, it will administer ‘bail-ins’ to ‘too-big-to-fail’ banks in distress; meaning – over-indebted banks will rescue themselves from depositors’ money, or from shareholders. This practice was tested in Cyprus in 2013. As reported by Reuters on 30 July 2013 – According to Cyprus’s central bank, “47.5 percent of deposits exceeding 100,000 euros in Bank of Cyprus would be converted into equity to recapitalize the troubled lender as part of an international financial bailout for the island”.
This confiscating or stealing of depositors’ funds, also called the ‘haircut’ in the denigrating jargon of the Occident, is better known as a ‘bail-in’ – since it avoids the taxpayer, those who have been bearing the brunt in previous US and European ‘bail-outs’.
This atrocious predatory and outright criminal imposition by the infamous troika (ECB, EC, IMF), with no legal backing whatsoever, went largely without protests in the rest of Europe, it was shortly thereafter accepted by the EC as the new ‘norm’.
In one of his last proud statements before handing his job as European Commissioner to Jean-Claude Juncker, Manuel Barroso exclaimed – “The European Union intends to break the vicious link between sovereigns and their banks. In the future bankers’ losses should no longer become the people’s debt, putting into doubt the financial stability of whole countries.”
There it is. The ratification of the new ‘bail-in’ rule. It is surprising that there is no run of the European banks, as many of them are less stable than they were in 2008, at the onset of the man-made ‘crisis’. Bail-ins might be imminent.
The third pillar will be the Single Resolution Fund – SRF – a stabilization and rescue mechanism for banks facing bankruptcy. It is planned to become effective on 1 January 2016 – if – and that is a big IF – the necessary funding will be put in place by the member countries.
Pillars one and two are compulsory for the Eurozone countries and banks, some 6000 – which is a lot to supervise. The ECB has quickly declared that it – i.e. SSM – will directly monitor the 150 most important ones. The others will continue to be controlled by national mechanisms, whatever these are. They will be given strict regulations to follow by SSM with sanctions or fines if the rules are not followed – to make sure they will not stray.
Membership for non-Eurozone countries is voluntary. Remarkably, the UK has not (yet) volunteered for membership.
This is the biggest boost in ECB’s power since its creation some 16 years ago. ECB now sets all banking standards throughout Europe, according to which a bank may fall or rise. This is a clear infringement on the Eurozone countries sovereignty – one of the key principles to be maintained according to the Lisbon Treaty. There is no covenant in ECB’s regulations that would give it this power leverage. It is all self-serving – and the neoliberal leaders of the Eurozone countries go along with it –to the detriment of their constituency.
And let’s not forget, ECB is intimately linked to Wall Street, the FED and the IMF – Mario Draghi, the ECB President, is a former Goldman Sachs executive.
The SSM is a flagrant conflict of interest – and it looks like the financial czars of this western greed economy are getting away with it. For now.
An independent audit of all European banks, especially those 100 or 150 considered “too big to fail” – and including the ECB itself – would indeed be in order. – Independent means – the auditors would report to a special council of Eurozone countries – but independent of the European Commission. The special council would include representation from member countries parliaments, the banking, industry and service sectors, as well as civil society.
Of course – this is unlikely to happen, equally unlikely as an independent audit of the FED. That would mean transferring power to the people, to those whose money is at play, those who are really interested in a well-functioning banking system – not a predatory one as we know it today.
According to The Guardian, a recent stress test carried out by the ECB on some 100 of the largest European banks, 24, or one of five, failed (including 9 Italian and 3 Greek banks), leaving a hole of 25 billion euros in banking capital – which eventually may need to be bailed-in — if there are no bail-outs and the SRF is not yet functional.
Implementation of the SSM will be a point of no return for European banks, including for individual countries sovereign central banks. Until now, they were nominally free to print their own money. For example, Greece could have rescued them-selves by printing its own euros, instead of submitting to the draconian, literally killer conditions, imposed by the troika. But it didn’t, since the ruling elite in Greece was and is part of the scheme. As of now, there is no ECB rule that forbids a local central bank to print its own money – which in the Eurozone is the euro.
Europeans will be at the mercy of the ECB and through it, of Wall Street and the FED – the defunct greedy dollar based monetary system.
And why do the people not react? – Because they are on purpose misinformed, kept in the dark by the media. The new SSM is presented as a system that would protect them from future crises – when the contrary is true.
However, at least equally important and highly suspicious, is the timing of this new delegation of power for the ECB. The abrogation of Eurozone countries and their banks sovereignty is not coincidental. It comes at a time when a new west-east conflict, a new Cold War with Russia is being instigated by Washington and its European vassals.
ECB’s new strong arm, the Single Supervisory Mechanism, with its transboundary powers and disregard for national sovereignty is intent to hold the Euro system and its countries hostage against Russia, or the new Russia-China alliance. The new watchdog watches that none of them will stray – perhaps into the eastern camp of honest trading, into a new realm of economic prosperity and equality, where banking may serve the peoples development, instead of the accumulation of wealth for a few.
Remember, Mr. Xi Jinping, President of China, visited Germany in March 2014, to offer Madame Merkel participation in the New Silk Road – a new trading alliance from Germany, the western most borders, all the way to Shanghai, covering Russia, the former Soviet Republics, north-western and central China. An incredible potential for trade and development that can hardly be ignored. If Germany accepts, the strongest nation of the Eurozone, the rest of Europe will follow – follow a path of more security and independence than the current alliance with threats and sanctions from a warmongering White House will offer.
Washington is aware of this. They will hold no barrels to sow unrest and destabilize Europe to eventually justify a US intervention, more NATO, more CIA surveillance, more profit-yielding armament – and moving ever a step closer to Moscow. The new banking control mechanism is just an additional – but extremely powerful tool in this direction.
An alternative monetary system, detached from the predatory dollar scheme, will be a welcome means to peacefully counter this latest financial aggression.
Peter Koenig is an economist and former World Bank staff. He worked extensively around the world in the fields of environment and water resources. He writes regularly for Global Research, ICH, the Voice of Russia, now Ria Novosti, The Vineyard of The Saker Blog, and other internet sites. He is the author of Implosion – An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and Corporate Greed – fiction based on facts and on 30 years of World Bank experience around the globe.
NotSoFast, I always read your comments, and I value them. I took your comment to say that people should take more responsibility for where they lodge their money, but I wonder if general banking – the simple, safe storing of liquid assets – is really that open to shopping around. Government regulation is designed to replace individual caveat emptor with a communal vigilance, and it works to the extent that the rules are known and don’t suddenly change.
We completely agree that banks should go out of business, at the very least, when they can’t produce their depositors’ money. The bail-in, as everyone sees, destroys even this simple piece of justice.
Thanks Penelope for the Exchange Stabilization Fund, which I need to study. This is a great thread, I wish I could thank each commenter. I’m glad we like to discuss money here, in between attacks ;)
The creation of money is a sovereign power. All sovereignty comes from the people. Regardless of the method of governance, all you have to do in any nation is ask who owns the new money created and you’ll know where the sovereignty of the people is actually being held.
I believe it’s true that the love of money is the root of all evil. And to me, nothing says “love of money” like compound interest.
State banks that treat capital as a public utility, and that don’t require an income from money, result in paradise economies, incredibly strong and shock-resistant. For the truth of that statement, Ellen Brown is a great place to start.
Given that the sovereign power of the nation is used to guarantee the validity of money, it is the supreme crime of crimes that money is created by private bankers. History and current affairs show that bankers will subvert, destroy and kill people and nations and anything noble they have to, in order to keep compound interest performing its unsleeping work of theft.
That’s what we’re up against.
Something I just wanted to correct in my comment about Catherine Austin Fitts,..
She was assistant secretary of HUD during the first Bush admin…senior Bush…and she was persecuted and attampted assassination during her tenure there…
That’s when she became a whistleblower …but whistle blowers still have to have a job…so she’s an investment advisor now and trys to help people invest their money by avoiding the huge corporations…but its amazing how these corporations infiltrate businesses…unbelievable.
[from Blue]
I just read this article, below. It’s good — lays it out very clearly.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/engineered-economic-crisis-simultaneous-inflation-and-deflation/5412686
Engineered Economic Crisis: Simultaneous Inflation and Deflation
By Prof. Ismael Hossein-Zadeh
Global Research, November 08, 2014
…
Hildegard von Bingen–Heaven and Earth, music for a Sunday Morning
“The euro, probably more than any other currency, represents the mutual confidence at the heart of our community. It is the first currency that has not only severed its link to gold, but also its link to the nation-state. It is not backed by the durability of the metal or by the authority of the state. Indeed, what Sir Thomas More said of gold five hundred years ago – that it was made for men and that it had its value by them – applies very well to the euro.” Wim Duisenberg 2002
The Euro’s mandate is price stability. The ECB is not controlled by the politicians, bureaucrats, court jesters, beggars and thieves of its member states. These politically correct special interest groups must rely on fiscal policy to fund their needs and wants, unlike the USA where cronies of government are able to fleece the ignorant people by deficit spending and currency debasement.
A debt which cannot be paid will not be paid. It is my opinion the ‘bail in’ is an honest way to resolve the problem of debt which cannot be paid. The ECB cannot debase the Euro to relieve the debtors creditors from their errors.
In the USD system the debt will be nominally paid, but the real value of the debt will not be paid by the mechanism of currency debasement. The unit of account is shaved by money creation without limit. It is a system of fraud and deception.
Euro Gold discusses these issues in great depth. There is a disinformation war waged in the media in conjunction with the currency war currently being waged to maintain the USD System. The USD System will sacrifice its currency to preserve its power, but the days of the USD Empire are numbered by the iron law of the exponential function.
It is my opinion the ECB is a natural ally of the Eurasian Project. This is opposite the main stream media and what is now becoming the main stream alternative media. There is a disinformation campaign being waged against the ECB and the Euro by the liars of the CIA and the US Treasury Department and their hangers-on. Educate yourself!
As a greek,i would like to mention that while 3 out of 4 of the *systemic* banks in our country failed,greek media were saying that all of our banks passed the *stress tests* of ECB.
I was amazed at that blunt lie from our media even tho i dont trust them a bit.Unbelievable really in the internet age….things seem and must be at critical point indeed.
ANN, GRIEVED, BOB KAY & those interested in Exchabnge Stabilization Fund. In addition to the Video, I found the Sars Schall intro interesting. Lars is a German financial journalist whose works and radio shows are always interesting.
The beginning of this podcast is about manipulation of the silver price and may be more detail than you want. In this case,begin listening at 10 w the Exch Stab Fund stuff.
Knowledge of the ESF lets you appreciate the emergency footing of the criminals in control & perhaps shows a vulnerability.
Luxembourg tax haven for Spanish large fortunes and Ibex companies:
http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=191750
All this needs to attach to cases of millionaries thefts aforementioned.
Then they have been saying since 2008 that the country is bad because, we the people, we have lived beyond our means and that, therefore, we have to tighten our belts.
Oops, I think I forgot to leave the Lars Schall link:
http://www.larsschall.com/2013/09/28/the-organized-crime-banking-at-its-finest-show-4/
@ Grieved
“….I wonder if general banking – the simple, safe storing of liquid assets – is really that open to shopping around. Government regulation is designed to replace individual caveat emptor with a communal vigilance, and it works to the extent that the rules are known and don’t suddenly change.
We completely agree that banks should go out of business, at the very least, when they can’t produce their depositors’ money. The bail-in, as everyone sees, destroys even this simple piece of justice.”
Let me first say that I am also very attentive to your comments and that I value them. As to the bailin/bailout question I basically agree with your idea of communal vigilance – except that our governments mostly seem to help the banksters and not the victims so that the idea of “vigilance” has been turned on its head. F. ex. I feel that bailouts are just encouragements for the banksters to restart their thieving under new guises: the victims who are robbed in a bailout are not the depositors directly but the whole population of taxpayers (if I understand correctly even the important depositors are bailed out with tax money) – and I feel that this is just a massive looting operation. And so, if you can’t trust the banksters, and if you can’t trust the government who else can you trust but your own vigilance?
Just my 2 cts
bob kay said:
“The austerity imposed on the EU countries is the result of the USD block of financial predators attacking the stability of the Euro. This war is carried out in the financial markets, media, and by blackmail and bribery. “
Hmm, basic design flaw, i guess: without the pan-european EURUSD exchange rate the club med would instantly be 20% more competitive today while German consumers would be able to spend also roughly 20% more on imports (instead of subsidizing their big exporters). No conspiracy here, just a long anticipated straight jacket.
“‘Old Europe’, from before the Anglo-Zionist Empire conquered Europe in the last century, created the ECB to eventually free itself from paying tribute and submission to the AZ Empire.”
Not really. EUR was the *US* precondition for German reunification. AZ was afraid of dominant Deutschmark and looking forward to some watering down. France didnt really have anything to say.
“They provided structural support for the USD until the ECB and Euro could provide a functioning money alternative to the USD.”
The French think along these lines now but for the last 50 years their various attempts to break free from Uncle Sam have always ended in humilation.
news from the homefront.
http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2014/11/08/more-homeless-feeding-arrests-in-ft-lauderdale-amid-national-backlash/
Q. You (pointing to the city manager) mentioned limits on our liability insurance policy. Who is the city’s liability insurance provider anyway?
A. I don’t know.
Q. You don’t know??? Well, Mr. Manager, thank you for confirming that your insurance spiel was just a pretext for a hidden agenda.
(Crowd guffaws.)
Q. You (pointing to police chief) said there was a meeting the day before hassling [the food providers] in which everyone agreed that Moore Square conditions have been improving for 6 months. Doesn’t that destroy your entire contention that this was suddenly an urgent situation?
A. (Blank stare.)
Q. You’re confused. Well, the answer to a yes-no question is yes, no, or I don’t know. Now…
(More laughter.)
BOB KAY, Thank you for your detailed defense of your view that ECB protects the soundness of currency & the stabilization of prices from govts & special interests.
My own view is different: Govts are at least potentially controllable by the people thru their political actions. ECB (and the Fed) are not controllable by the people & their reps so that they do not act to build/repair infrastructure thus expanding the labor market and consumer spending.
In the case of the EU the loss of sovereignty by the inividual countries is obvious because they cannot have more than a 3% budget deficit. So it is quite impossible for them to invest in infrastructure. Govt spending is treated as if it were nonproductive, a deadweight. Where only private investment is permitted EU infrastructure of all types will end up privately owned. This is called “the free market”! This is a not a world we want to live in.
http://michael-hudson.com/2011/06/how-financial-oligarchy-replaces-democracy/
Bob Kay at 15:12 thanks for that link to Euro Gold. I give FOFOA supreme respect. I re-read your comment in light of the article, and I see where you’re coming from now – thanks for being so persistent in this thread.
It’s a great article – that’s a lovely analogy of the market fair and scrip created by the fair operator. Noting that clearing the scrip ultimately takes gold.
And I was blown away by the concept that debt will always be protected, even sacrificing the currency to buy it with cash. It’s so obviously true in our current experience. Everything must be thrown onto the fire that heats the steam that drives the compound interest day and night. Debt, and the masters of debt, are the true overlord of this world and most of its monetary systems, perhaps all, I don’t know.
I still regard the “bail-in” as a total perversion of banking concepts. it will come back to bite the system. But as we see, anything to preserve debt, throw anything on the fire.
Now I have some more work to do, to figure out what mechanism creates the Euro. What is the base of that currency? And is it ultimately cleared in gold? One commenter at FOFOA said that in Europe you can buy gold coins (e.g. with Euros) that don’t attract tax or capital gains.
I’m still driven by sovereignty as the true Grail. The Euro is what the hard-money people would call legal tender, as opposed to lawful money. The US example would be silver and gold coins as the only lawful money, while legal tender is the Federal Reserve Note. This matters because sovereignty forms a part of lawful money, but is subordinated to legal tender.
I need to know more about the Euro. It seems that it can survive the USD hyperinflation, but I need to study this more. I could see it in a basket of currencies. Some talk of the Special Drawing Rights (SDR) of the IMF replacing USD as the global reserve currency. It’s easy to see how that could be accepted.
All of it will be used as a way to protect debt, holding sovereignty in chains in pursuit of the task.
Just one specific example of what might already bee happening in uke, with more to come if they plant GMO crops like the majority acreage 5 or 6 fodder crops, & the damage to their entire ag output if they also have poisonous chemicals from fracking for oil/gas leaking down into the aquifers.
EU countries only have a 2-year ‘moratorium’ against this specific neonicotinoid class,used now here n. am. to great regret for nearly 2 decades, & it’s 1 year in now.
http://healthcanadaabuse.ca/articles.php?command=show&ID=22592
Thanks for all enlightening comments, and I think I have it straight what are the different parameters of
system between EU and US.
However, I find this statement difficult to digest:
Bob Kay – ” It is my opinion the ‘bail in’ is an honest way to resolve the problem of debt which cannot be paid. “
The example the article gives is that of a citizen returning to Cypress from working in Australia, whose savings deposit is wiped out by the bail-in. If that is an accurate account, how is doing this honest? Are we supposed to just sweep that under the rug on behalf of the greater good?
What am I missing? Perhaps that there is a leveling effect in operation with the bail-in similar to the utopian issuance of gold to all US citizens that would stabilize the US currency back to rational norms if the US could default on its debt – is that what the bail-in does?
[I’m sorry – woeful ignorance on these matters, and math was my worst subject in school.]
Dear Juliania,
Whom do you think should make good on the money the depositor loaned to the bank? The money is gone whether by chance or theft. It is a debt to the creditor (depositor) which cannot be paid, except by taking from the taxpayer to give to the creditor (depositor). I think people should be responsible for due diligence when loaning (depositing) money to a bank.
Sheikh Imran explains the Ukrainian crisis by exposing who created the Soviet Union (and what for), who really brought Communism, why Crimea and Donbass regions were given away to Ukraine, the main goal of NATO expansion, and the role that the Zionists play in all of this.
[RUS]: Шейх Имран объясняет Украинский кризис разоблачая кто создал Советский Союз (и зачем), кто действительно создал коммунизм, почему Крым и Донбасс были отданы Украине, главная цель расширения НАТО, и роль которую Сионисты играют во всём этом.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWpZ-9h4cZ0
Jiana: The Glass-Steagle Act in US for many years separated banks’ speculative actions from regular banking. It is only since abolishing Glass-Steagle in Pres Clinton’s time that it’s possile for banks to use depositors’ money in such irresponsible ways.
The bail-in saves the banks’ shareholders at the expense of the depositors. Nationalize bankrupt banks and their assets, as Iceland did. When the 2008 crash occurred there was enough money in the FDIC fund to make all depositors whole, but the big banks own Congress, so they got a ‘bail OUT’ (taxpayers paid). This too is wrong.
“””The European Arrest Warrant” Should be Applied to this Bunch!”
Marvelous “Double-think” going on this week (it’s where to start is all), pick & choose “Democracy” from the U.K Govt.! Right we don’t want “The European Convention on Human Rights” so we’ll discuss that but we do want “The European Arrest Warrant” so we won’t discuss that (having openly declared that the E.U Arrest Warrant would indeed be discussed in The House)! We don’t support the current E.U structure but we will collude in denying The Scots the chance to vote on an independence that won’t break the bank! We now see these two streams of “real politik” in all our representative institutions from local government to the United Nations. Monetarism’s Social Darwinism is becoming more evident, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership being the vehicle by which the transatlantic neo-con agenda (now the driving philosophy of NATO), is being rammed through the European Body Politic to the borders of Mother Russia herself (and throughout Turkey and -by exstension-, The Middle East as-well). How has Pallas Athena offended us so badly as to provoke us to perpetrate these obscenities? Well for one thing The European Union is too big ( http://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/oder.htm ), as Schumacher intimated in “Small is Beautiful”; “a “Greater Europe” will represent an unsupported socio-economic structure and must collapse” (and now the NATO agenda has created precisely the dangerous leviathan necessary to do the demolition work)!
Why should not The Poles (who “don’t like” The Germans and consistently produce the lowest turn out of any E.U nation in European elections), The Western Ukrainians (bye bye Crimea!), and the other “recently assimilated” Eastern European States* attend to their own business? Such would surely be both socially and financially better for all of us.
Take the debacle over the Shengen agreement. Really Mr.Major? Your country’s citizens got nothing out of that, is Europe only for the businessmen then? It seems so (quote; “The free movement of persons was a core part of the original Treaty of Rome” go to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schengen_Agreement ). One would think that it would be the job of our country’s “liberal-left” to point out the “diminishment of persons” that not becoming signatories to The Shengen Agreement represented but noooo as so often where European politics is concerned there was a terrible silence in the “oppositional barn”.
We can however sleazily expel a rabble rousing inciter of terrorism to the “whited sepulcre” of his native land because the rest of Europe doesn’t really want to be implicated in our extraordinary rendition problems (partly because of their own involvement but mostly because there is TTIP and other money involved -“investments” which would be jeaporidised by exposing Britain-)!
*Possibly and perhaps “more sensibly” Turkey also?
Also see: “Perfidious Albion” http://gkhales.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/perfidious-albion.html “Shady Deals” http://gkhales.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/shady-deals.html “The “European” Omerta.” http://gkhales.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/the-european-ometa.html “Never Under Estimate the Power of The Dark Side Mr.Secretary” http://gkhales.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/never-under-estimate-power-of-dark-side.html “The Omerta’s Blind Spot?” http://gkhales.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/the-omertas-blind-spot.html ” “Arafel” gkhals.blogspot.co.uk