(thanks to LH for pointing out this article to me – VS)
by Elizabeth Woodworth for Global Research
Abstract
In the past year, in response to emerging independent science on the 9/11 attacks, nine corporate, seven public, and two independent media outlets aired analytic programs investigating the official account. Increasingly, the issue is treated as a scientific controversy worthy of debate, rather than as a “conspiracy theory” ignoring science and common sense. This essay presents these media analyses in the form of 18 case studies. Eight countries – Britain, Canada, Denmark, France, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway and Russia – have allowed their publicly-owned broadcasting stations to air the full spectrum of evidence challenging the truth of the official account of 9/11.
This more open approach taken in the international media – I could also have included the Japanese media – might be a sign that worldwide public and corporate media organizations are positioning themselves, and preparing their audiences, for a possible revelation of the truth of the claim that forces within the US government were complicit in the attacks – a revelation that would call into question the publicly given rationale for the military operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.
The evidence now being explored in the international media may pave the way for the US media to take an in-depth look at the implications of what is now known about 9/11, and to re-examine the country’s foreign and domestic policies in the light of this knowledge.
read the full article here:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?aid=16505&context=va
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=17624
——-
Note: Russia’s TV Channel 1 organized a major 9/11 event hosted by Alexander Gordon’s “Private Viewing” (Закрытый Показ) show which showed the movie “Zero: a 9/11 investigation” followed by a debate featuring Franco Fracassi and Europarlamentarian Guilietto Chiesa (the authors of this documentary), Thierry Meyssan (the french reporter who was the first to raise questions about 9/11), Lieutenant-General Leonid Ivashev, ex KGB experts and many 9/11 witnesses and survivors (For those of you who understand Russian – you can download the full movie and debate here: http://www.rutor.org/torrent/6646/911-rassledovanie-s-nulja_zero-investigation-into-9/11-2007-tvrip). The discussion ended in what can only be called a crushing defeat for the supporters of the “official” 9/11 narrative with even Alexander Gordon himself backing the ‘truthers” (Gordon, who lived and worked in the USA for many years is usually known for his pro-USA views).
The Saker
please try to track down an english translation of nasrallah’s speech today.
@anonymous: of course, I will do my best. also, FYI, there is a good site to look his speeches up:
http://www.intheireyes.info/
HTH!
Saker,
since I don’t believe the public in this country is ready to hear the truth, do you think that foreign governments can start an international “truther movement” that would raise questions US officials would rather not answer?
Of course, they could do this indirectly through “retired” government employees. Perhaps that was even the point of the Russian program?
Also, for your non Russian readers, could you very briefly relate some of the points made in the program?
Thanx
Saker, any analysis of the AlQaida leader captured in Karachi?
Zerkes
http://www.youtube.com/user/shabbirh#p/u/7/TpapIBgwC3k
nasrallah’s speech transnlated
@everybody: please forgive my very short answers to you all, I am under a lot of time pressue.
1) Nasrallah speech: AMAZING speech which I urge everybody to listen to. I absolutley and totally agree with Sayyed Hassan’s views on the weakness of the Israeli position.
2)Russian 9/11 program: the conclusion was that 9/11 was in inside job.
3) Capture in Pakistan: I believe that the captured person was Taliban, and not “al-Qaeda”. I don’t believe that this capture, or anyone else’s capture, including Mollah Omar, will make much of a difference. There is no Afghan version of Abdullah Ocalan
@Yourube of Nasrallah’s speech: thanks A LOT for that pointer. This is really an amazing speech. I wish the damn youtube did not limit the segment length. Does anybody have the full speech in one video?
Again – my sincere apologies to all of you for the hyper short answers.
The Saker
@Lysander: I will address your question in a post soon. Stay tuned. VS