By Nikolai Starikov
Translated by Val from Osa
http://www.vz.ru/opinions/2014/12/25/722171.html
How long the West is willing to pay for the crumbling economy of Ukraine without guarantees of the beginning of its war with Russia? The Western strategy rule says: lost control over the territory – create the Antithesis.
It is possible to understand what is happening in Ukraine, it is much more difficult to evaluate and forecast the development of events. Whatever the case, it is necessary to consistently follow one rule: set emotions aside. Blood, death and destruction are the most serious emotional blows, but if you follow your emotions, neither proper assessment nor correct forecast will result.
Therefore, as hard it can be, set emotions aside. To assess the geopolitical game (and this is what we are looking at) we need only the head. Only conscious manipulators want you to think with your heart (and vote with your heart – as for Yeltsin in 1996).
The United States and the West are facing of the strongest crises in its history. The strength and depth of the problem are compounded by the fact that … the West has won. It incorporated practically all of Europe, crushed, to varying degrees, the whole world with a few exceptions.
Therein lies the problem – all its life the West lived by robbery. Now those who can be robbed are fewer and fewer, and those with whom it is necessary to share the “stolen goods”, that is the standard of living that rests on unrestricted dollar emissions, are more and more. Hence the huge national debt. In the United States it is 18 trillion dollars, but such debts, and even worse ratios of the national debt to GDP, exist in all so-called developed countries.
What solution the US and its closest allies are looking for in this situation? It is now evident to everyone. The solution is war. Chaos. But this chaos and this war must lead to a “controlled collapse”.
As a result the US must eliminate two threats to its power – China and Russia. Ideally, make them clash with each other. To do this the US need to change regime in one of these countries. Obviously, the Americans think that the regime change in Russia is an easier task.
The question is how to achieve this? Orange technologies did not work in 2011, Putin became president again.
What the West does when it loses in any territory is most important for understanding the events in Ukraine.
When we talk about a Western loss we mean the failure of its plans and loss of control over a certain area, full or partial.
What do the Western strategists do in such a situation?
1949. Britain is “kicked out” of India. Before leaving the British set up the Anti-India – a new state of Pakistan. Tensions, military conflicts between the new states ensue. In short, many opportunities for the Anglo-Saxons.
Again in 1949. As a result of the civil war in China, pro-Soviet Mao Zedong wins. The US lose control over China. What do they do? Create the Anti-China -Taiwan. Evacuate there the army of Chiang Kai-shek under the protection of the US Navy. Tensions, the permanent possibility of war between China and the Anti-China ensue. Tiananmen Square, 1989, Beijing – who can tell the “desperate” mainland Chinese from the agents of the Taiwanese special services?
Attention please. In the geopolitical game to grant a diplomatic recognition is to follow the current ‘national’ interests, and nothing more. First, the United States recognizes Taiwan as China. For those who do not know: until 1973 the representative of Taiwan at the United Nations was seated as the representative of China. But later Washington changes its position, recognizes Beijing and ceases to recognize Taipei. At the same time it strongly supports Taiwan and prevents the reunification of the two “Chinas”
Let’s not stray far into history. The rule of the permanent Anglo-Saxon Western strategy states: lost control over the territory – create Antithesis.
In 2011 the West loses control of Russia – not completely yet, but its plans to deny Putin another presidential term fail. The dismantling of the fifth column begins, Russia strongly defends its interests in the world.
What is the West to do? Create Antithesis. That is the Anti-Russia.
And the Anglo-Saxons start creating it, the soil is prepared in Ukraine. Propaganda starts in 1991 and even earlier, militants are trained, money is allocated, the elite is bought and well fed.
According to the US plans, Yanukovych should be removed during the elections in 2015. Remove him in such a way as to launch anti-Russian hysteria and begin to create the Anti-Russia from Ukraine. Circumstances force an earlier start, but according to the main rule: not the peaceful departure of Yanukovych is required, but a bloody overthrow in order to blame Russia.
What is happening today in Ukraine is nothing more than the creation of the Anti-Russia. Propaganda, hate, readiness to destroy and kill on the part of the nationalists and some deceived common citizens.
Where do the US go with that? To war between Ukraine and Russia. On the “initiative” of Ukraine. When? When they pump up the Ukrainian army, equip it, create it, and prepare it. It will take about five years. After that the US will try to pit the two parts of the same nation against each other, set Ukraine against Russia. Occasion – Crimea.
Were the Crimea not reunited with Russia, it would still remain an excuse. Basing the Russian army in Crimea, pro-Russian population living there would give a lot of opportunities for the organization of conflicts and provocations. Therefore, regardless of the actions of Putin and the people of Crimea the Western plan would remain the same.
What can stop the development of this terrible scenario of sliding into a major war between brothers?
Support of those in Ukraine itself who do not agree with this turn of events.
The West creates the Anti-Russia, Russia must help and support the Anti-anti-Russia.
When in the Southeast of Ukraine the people who do not agree with the Kiev’s coup rose up, few had a clear idea that they were “blocking the road” of such a terrible scenario. The presence of the Anti-anti-Russia as a part of a federalized Ukraine, refusing either to arm for the West, nor to pull the chestnuts out of the fire for it, blocked the Western plans to unleash the Ukrainian-Russian war. Remember the end of the spring of 2014?
Moscow’s insistent calls for the territorial integrity of Ukraine, for federalization, for negotiations. Moscow needs a unified Ukraine, where the pro-Russian part of the society will “tie” the hands of the militants and bought politicians, and will not allow to draw the whole Ukrainian people into the war.
The West needs not the peace, not the prosperity of Ukraine. It needs a militarized state with an aggressive ideology in the form of hatred directed against Russia.
Kiev begins aggressive actions against Donbass. Immediately the propaganda about the “terrorists” and the Russian military starts. Military actions, conducted with cruelty to civilians, give the West two possibilities:
– To win by military means and then start the planned collapse of the economy of Ukraine as the beginning of its preparation for war with Russia. The well fed do not want to fight. The West can blame Russia for the difficulties and hardships, whereas the military service provides an income, albeit a tiny one;
– To draw Russia into war, forcing her to send troops into Ukraine. The defeat of the Ukrainian armed forces does not matter for the West. It wants not the victory but the war itself.
And the more Ukrainian citizens will die in the fratricidal war, the better for the West – the rebellious Slavic nation eliminates itself. As a result of the war in Ukraine the West will try to repeat 1917 and “overthrow the bloody Kremlin regime.” All of it in order to take the course toward preparation of the war between Russia and China.
And then a problem happened. Neither military success nor the military invasion by Russia and its participation in the civil conflict was achieved.
And then what? That’s what.
The existence of the DNR and LNR as Anti-anti-Russia is the key to inability of the West to start a war between Ukraine and Russia.
The cannonball on its leg does not let the United States to push Kiev toward this Great War with tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of victims.
That is why Moscow is helping Donbass in every way possible that is why Sergei Lavrov says that we are for the territorial integrity of Ukraine.
That is why Russia does not recognize the DNR and LNR as independent states. To recognize them, to let them secede means to launch countdown for war with Ukraine. In this scenario the Western plan kicks in: there is Russia, there is Anti-Russia, and there is Novorossia. Anti-anti-Russia is no more. In case of incorporation of Donbass into Russia, those in Washington will stand up and give a standing ovation. This is it: the war becomes practically inevitable. The image of Russia as the enemy is created by Russia itself.
In today’s situation the Russian tactics in Ukraine are the only correct ones. US must pay to support 40 million people, Russia must help 3 million people in the Donbass and 1.5 million refugees. Moscow constantly insists on negotiations, not allowing the aggressor being shaped by the west to “remove the weight” from its leg, not allowing DNR and LNR to be defeated militarily.
How long will the West be willing to pay for the crumbling economy of Ukraine without guarantees to begin its war with Russia? These guys do nothing without a reason, they do not throw money away. Even to the militants in Chechnya in the 90’s they gave no dollars, instead they gave them clichés for printing fake dollars.
Self-financing – is the principle of the Anglo-Saxon politics, in extreme cases a refund within a short period of time. A striking example: the Bolsheviks paying with Russia’s gold through Swedish banks and the subsequent concessions, today’s Libyan “freedom fighters” with the oil dollars leaving Libya for unknown destinations.
Time is of great importance today. The bet of the West – to organize a new Maidan in Russia, now that the path to war in Ukraine was blocked by the courage and determination of the DNR and LNR militia fighters. The bet of Russia – wait till the West loses its interest in Ukraine because of high costs without any tangible benefits.
Washington’s desire to get “at least something” leads to the pressure on Europe and the paradoxical desire of the Europeans not to allow the construction of the “South Stream”.
Paradox? No paradox. Washington wants to use the instability of Ukraine at least for a possibility of gas blackmail of Moscow. And Europe.
That is the essence of current and past events in Ukraine.
And the last thing I want to say in this regard.
Few in today’s Ukraine understand what a tremendous role the courage of the Donbass residents plays in today’s world politics. They are rescuing the entire Russian world today. And the paradox, they save the lives of hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian citizens.
The same children that today are “jumping” in Ukrainian schools, whose parents collect money for ATO, support the Kiev authorities, in case of defeat Donbass, in a very short period of time they will become gun fodder, according to the US plan.
That’s what all of us need to remember, regardless of our current citizenship.
Alien Tech, I’m sorry. I’m not computer-knowledgeable.
I have a beautiful link to the Starikov book that looks exactly like this
[pdf] Rouble Nationalization – the Way to Russia’s Freedom by Nikolay Starikov
Except of course it is blue and underscored entirely in blue, and when I click on it it asks if I want to open it. So I’ve read half the book.
But when I copy the link here it no longer functions. I have no idea why. I remember that I initially had to copy it to a file to make it work, but I don’t remember where on the internet I got it.
Here are two different links to the book that I found. Maybe they are serviceable too?
http://lit.md/files/nstarikov/rouble_nationalization-the_way_to_russia's_freedom.pdf
http://www.academia.edu/6622292/Nikolai_Starikov_-_Rouble_Nationalization_Central_Banks_around_the_globe_
Tiene razón Anonymus(31 December, 2014 16:20) cuando dice:
“Hasta que Putin tome el control del rublo del Banco Central, no va a controlar el destino de Rusia”
Pero debe tener mucho cuidado al hacerlo, ya que los soberanos en el mundo son la élite que emite el dinero (los dueños de la Reserva Federal y otros) y enfrentarse a ellos es peligroso. Ya lo hizo Stalin y ello fue el comienzo de la destrucción de la URSS, mediante la introducción de personajes infiltrados.
En los EEUU, cuando JF Kennedy emitió dinero del Tesoro americano, en lugar de pedirlo prestado a la Reserva Federal, fue fusilado mientras lo veía el pueblo por televisión.
Varios elementos para una nueva Economía:
– La clave del crecimiento está en la reinversión de beneficios. Se puede establecer por ley un coeficiente obligatorio de reinversión a las compañías extranjeras.
– Hay que dar prioridad a la Economía productiva y subordinar a ella la economía financiera. En caso contrario, los BRICS serán una repetición de lo que ya existe y sus lacras.
– También es necesario establecer un límite razonable al volumen máximo de propiedad privada y al de control económico mediante compañías de cartera o holding, para evitar que el monopolio privado impida al Gobierno dirigir las líneas maestras de la economía, y estas las diseñe una élite plutocrática financiera, a la que no le interesa la ciudadanía sino el lucro.
———————–
Automatic translation:
Anonymous is right (31 December, 2014 16:20) when he says:
“Until Putin take control of the ruble Central Bank will not control the destiny of Russia”
But be very careful in doing so because the sovereign in the world are the elite issuing money (the owners of the Federal Reserve and other) and face them is dangerous. It did Stalin and this was the beginning of the destruction of the USSR, infiltrated by entering characters.
In the US, when JF Kennedy issued US Treasury money, rather than borrow from the Federal Reserve, was shot as he watched the people on television.
Several elements for a new economy:
– The key to growth is reinvesting profits. You can establish by law a mandatory reinvestment coefficient foreign companies.
– A productive economy should be given priority and subordinate to her financial economics. Otherwise, the BRICS will be a repetition of what already exists and its ills.
– You also need to set a reasonable limit on the maximum amount of private property and economic control by holding companies or holding, to prevent the private monopoly prevents the government directing the guidelines of the economy, and these the design a plutocratic elite financial, which is not interested citizens but profit.
“Self-financing – is the principle of the Anglo-Saxon politics, in extreme cases a refund within a short period of time. A striking example: the Bolsheviks paying with Russia’s gold through Swedish banks and the subsequent concessions, today’s Libyan “freedom fighters” with the oil dollars leaving Libya for unknown destinations.
Time is of great importance today. The bet of the West – to organize a new Maidan in Russia, now that the path to war in Ukraine was blocked by the courage and determination of the DNR and LNR militia fighters. The bet of Russia – wait till the West loses its interest in Ukraine because of high costs without any tangible benefits. “
That my friends is the ESSENCE of a successful operation.
It was achieved in Greece between 1941 and 1949 with a break 1946-1947.
When the Greeks faced first the unwilling Italians and then the murderous German Axis, to be followed by, Greek against Greek, with Britain aiding the Royalist puppets of the British (HOW Ironic, my family fought on the side of the Royalists and the British, and we lost my uncle).
What fascinates me is that the British were throwing Gold sovereigns to the resistance to both sides from accounts by witnesses. That hit me as illogical.
But today Staricov gave me the answer to the puzzle.
Thank you Staricov.
My job is to inform my fellow Greeks. We do in fact have people that promote civil war in Greece. They are the old Nazi collaborators that subsequently turn to support the British.
I am happy to say that today the old anti-communists that were by default Anti-Russian are NOT MORE.
Instead 1974 turn most of them into Anti-Americans, (little do they know that what all Washington Administrations were all along, in fact Fascists, including ME.
Saker, I cannot THANK YOU enough for your contribution, We are fighting the same Foe in Greece, RIGHT NOW.
I wish to God and very few times I pray that The Greeks wake up it will change everything (Geo-stratigically I would like Eugeny Feodorov to analyze what would happen if Greece throws the NATO Bases out as we were promised by Andreas Papandreou, (another American Spy as well as the entire family)
Penelope, the article you now show is different from the previous one and the leaked document indeed shows a groundspeed of 64 knots. I assume this info. all comes from the mode S transponder onboard the Airbus and interrogated by secondary radar. Assuming the transponder didn’t get zapped by lightning and is beaming out correct information it means the power source was intact and that unless the Airbus turbofans suddenly acquired afterburners that only a strong updraft could explain the ascent rate. The descent rate of 11,518 ft/min is equivalent to a person at terminal velocity (184 ft/sec)in freefall. It takes about 11 seconds for a person to reach terminal velocity (I can personally attest to this)and if the wings had broken off I can see this being exceeded easily by the Airbus -particularly on a downdraft of an added 11,000 ft/min vertical velocity. Whether the transponder would still receive power with wings and engines gone I am not qualified to answer. What the area of drag of the falling Airbus is, who knows -it will depend on the damage, but obviously a nose first dive would exceed Vne very quickly and the wings would separate soon after.
Having been personally sucked up by a massive thunderstorm 30 miles away I have no difficulty believing any of these figures, but I am also not a qualified accident investigator.
Penelope : I’m sorry. I’m not computer-knowledgeable.
I have a beautiful link to the Starikov book that looks exactly like this
[pdf] Rouble Nationalization – the Way to Russia’s Freedom by Nikolay Starikov
Go to that line, when the line changes color, RIGHT click it and copy the link.. It will not show up as the text shown above but will have the actual link for you to Paste into the message you are posting, You still need to paste the rest of the text as well.. LEFT clicking on the line will just take you to the original site which hosts the article rather than a link to the article.
IF you are using a what you see is what you get kind of editor which some sites use, the way you do it would work since the program itself would copy everything automatically.. But that was what steve jobs was good at.. We live in the Bill gates world which is not so easy.. We have to do things the hard way.. Maybe thats why jobs stock price went from $8 to $800 and gates stock is still hanging around the last decade wondering.. are these guys still living in the commodore 64 days or wut
to validate argument of ukraine being created as anti-russia, people give as an example creation of pakistan (as anti-india). i think this is not fair. russia justifies annexation of crimea and its support for novorussia by claiming to respect and uphold the wishes of people of these regions. that is why people thinking rationally support russia’s actions (on what other basis can anyone reject USA’s stance that russia invaded crimea and putin’s “intentions” are expansionist). similarly before the partition of india, muslims in that region WANTED creation of pakistan. so whatever the intentions of british they ultimately made the right decision (in this particular case).
Since we are on this subject, Kashmir’s case is similar to Crimea’s. people there WANT either annexation with Pakistan or Independence.
@ Ακαρναν Καππα
Russia got a lot of work to do…
At present, it has natural resources based economy, and Soviet-style- centralized governance.
Alien Tech, here is the link RIGHT-clicked.
STARIKOV BOOK [pdf] Rouble Nationalization – the Way to Russia’s Freedom by Nikolay Starikov
Good luck.