According to the BBC: “Turkey’s air strikes against Kurdish rebels in Iraq on Sunday were approved by the United States in advance, the Turkish military says. The country’s top general, Yasar Buyukanit, said the US opened northern Iraqi airspace for the operation. Jets targeted the Kurdish rebel PKK in areas near the border. The Turkish media said up to 50 planes were used. Iraqi officials say bombs hit 10 villages, killing one woman, while the PKK reported seven deaths. Iraq has summoned the Turkish ambassador in Baghdad and demanded a halt to the strikes“
Fascinating, isn’t it? The USA has, presumably, returned its sovereignty to Iraq. Yet it enables an attack on Iraqi soil by one of its neighbors. The occupation forces have, of course, already kidnapped Iranian diplomats in Iraq against the will of the legal government of Iraq, but actually assisting an external power to conduct airstrikes on targets in Iraq is something of a different order of magnitude.
So much for the issue of whether one should speak of a sovereign Iraq or not. Ditto for whether the Imperial forces should be called ‘coalition forces’ or ‘occupation forces’ (not to mention that there still is no SOFA agreement in Iraq).
These airstrikes also settle the issue of whether the USA supports the Kurds or not: while having to deal with the ‘good’ Iraq Kurds who are needed as a showcase for the ‘stable Iraq’ Washington is more than willing to assist Turkey to attack the ‘bad’ Turkish Kurds even if that means carrying out strikes inside the territory controlled by the ‘good Kurds’. Washington’s “good Kurds, bad Kurds” policy is yet another monument to the phenomenal hypocrisy of the Neocons whose entire Middle-East policy is defined by one and only overwhelming goal: to please the Israeli Likudniks, hence the support for Turkey against the “bad Kurds” and AIPAC’s support of Turkey in Congress (talk about an ‘axis of evil’!).
What will the effects of these strikes be? Beyond stroking the ruffled feathers of the Turkish population and killing a number of (mostly civilian) Kurds – nothing. If there is one thing which military history has proven beyond the slightest doubts is that air and artillery strikes do not work in mountains.
There is, of course, the remote possibility that these strikes are just part of a preparation for a larger ground invasion by the Turkish military. I personally doubt that the Turks could actually be stupid enough to try something like that, but then I would never have thought that Olmert would be stupid enough to launch a ground invasion of Lebanon last year. So maybe the Turks need a good whopping by the PKK to come back to their senses.
The only certain effect of the US support for these strikes is that it will show, yet again, to the Kurds and the Iraqis that they are dealing with one common enemy who hypocrisy truly know no bounds. But they already knew that, of course.
Kurdistan is PIC. That is why MND-N outgoing commander Mixon in October said that there is no planning that he is aware of for US military operations in Kurdistan.
The total number of American troops in Kurdistan in less than a hundred.
I am sure the Turks informed America (and maybe the UK) as a courtesy but would have struck any way. What I suspect really happened is that the Kurdistan government (and possibly even PM Maliki) was (were) also “unofficially” informed with the understanding that the Kurdistan government could remain “officially” uninformed. If so, then everything probably went as planned. This seems like a face saving way out for everyone, especially if it reduces public pressure inside Turkey to invade Northern Iraq.
It is far from clear that the Kurds were betrayed at this juncture (although it is also unclear if the Kurds were not betrayed). {The Kurds might have informally said that attacking certain targets were really really bad, while attacking other targets were merely bad. Wink Wink.}
The USA has, presumably, returned its sovereignty to Iraq. Yet it enables an attack on Iraqi soil by one of its neighbors.
Yes. And Buyukanit has admitted the same:
“America gave intelligence,” Kanal D television quoted Buyukanit as saying. “But more importantly, America last night opened [the Iraqi] airspace to us. By opening the airspace, America gave its approval to this operation,” he said.
“Even if it’s winter, even if there’s snow, even if they live in caves, we’ll find them and hit them,” he added, according to the report. “These operations will continue all the time.”
These statements are in Turkish media too, and both Buyukanit and Babacan deny that civilians were bombed. However, AP did, in fact, sneak into one of the villages and I posted some of their photos tonight.
Unfortunately, I don’t think there will be a ground invasion. You don’t hear Barzani squealing about it. Remember the time of year and the climate.
A ground invasion would mean a lot of dead Turks, just as has happened every previous time they’ve invaded South Kurdistan.
And let’s consider that America the Warmonger has been bombing civilians for many years, not only in the last six. It is their nature.
And people wonder why 9/11 happened.
Fascinating, isn’t it? The USA has, presumably, returned its sovereignty to Iraq. Yet it enables an attack on Iraqi soil by one of its neighbors.
Well, I guess “fascinating” is one word you could use for it.
One of the other salient point about the Turkish incursion into Kurdistan is that, as Justin Raimondo points out in a recent column, it pits American interests against Israeli interests in Iraq.
This looks to be bad news for everyone, especially considering that Kurdistan was the one stable region in Iraq. The only positive outcome that can conceivably emerge is that this might provide the impetus needed to more closely scrutinize our relationship with Israel, as Israel appears to be a major ally of the PKK. Hopefully it will also force America to reconsider the consequences of enforcing and extending it’s “benevolent global hegemony” in the region.
-AA
Anonymous, could I have your source for this claim: as Israel appears to be a major ally of the PKK..
Thanks.
Would the people commenting here prefer an operation by the Iraqi Army or Kurdistan police (peshmerga) to a Turkish military action?
I think that the GoI and Kurdistan provincial government prefer Turkish military action to taking action themselves.
I like Mizgîn am skeptical that Israel backs the PKK. Israel and Turkey are close allies.